DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Cincinnati

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Cincinnati UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI _____________November 13 , 20 _____03 I,________________________________Yuki Furuya ______________, hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: ________________________Master of Arts ________________________ in: ________________________The Department of Classical Studies________________________ It is entitled: ________________________A Study of Building III at the Neolithic________________________ Acropolis of Halai, ________________________Greece ________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Approved by: ________________________Professor Jack L. Davis ________________________Professor Gisela E. Walberg ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ A STUDY OF BUILDING III AT THE NEOLITHIC ACROPOLIS OF HALAI, GREECE A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Classical Studies of the College of Arts and Sciences 2003 by Yuki Furuya B.A., Cornell University, Ithaca 2001 Committee Chair: Jack L. Davis ABSTRACT Building III is a Neolithic architectural remain in the archaeological site of Halai in Central Greece. It is a small one-room unit of stone and mudbrick construction measuring 2 m x 2.4 m, containing features including a doorway, window, buttress and stone pavements. Radiocarbon analysis suggests a dating between 5900 and 5700 BC, or the Greek Middle Neolithic Period. The finds excavated from Building III include obsidian tools and Neolithic Red-on-White ware, which are both characteristic of the period. Building III is a special existence among the six Middle Neolithic structures excavated from Halai because it is the best preserved, and also was in use for probably the longest period of time. Building III overlapped in its phase of use with two early structures, Buildings I and II. After these two structures fell out of use, Building III was left standing while they were built over with three new structures. Major renovations were made to Building III during the course of its use. A buttress was created to fortify a collapsing wall. The doorway and window were sealed in reaction to the construction of the three later buildings in extreme proximity to it. That Building III was preserved and renovated was a deliberate choice indicating its importance or usefulness. The evidence extracted from its two successive phases – one before and one after the renovation mentioned above – suggest two different types of activities, possibly caused by the structural alteration. In the early phase of the structure, an abundance of faunal remains, burnt pottery sherds and carbonized material were discovered, suggesting that food processing was done within the building. In its late phase patches of cobble pavements were laid on the floor, suggesting that the structure was used as a storage room. Building III finds are representative of the general lifestyle of the Neolithic settlement at Halai. The range of domestic and wild faunal and floral remains are indicative of the fact that Halai was a coastal settlement that apparently took advantage of its location – by hunting, keeping livestock, farming, obtaining seafood and conducting maritime obsidian trade. PREFACE My participation in the Cornell Halai East Lokris Project (CHELP), directed by Professor John E. Coleman, started in the summer of 2000. I was given the opportunity to participate in the 2000 study season at Halai while studying under Professor Coleman for my undergraduate degree at Cornell University. I arrived at my first season as an undergraduate volunteer. My primary responsibilities included assisting the main site conservator, working on the electronic database, and drawing chipped stone tools and other small finds for publication. During the following season in 2001, during which no study permit was granted, participants were restricted to conducting research that did not require data either from the site or the storeroom. It was during this season that Professor Coleman first approached me about working on Building III. This assignment initially entailed summarizing information concerning Building III obtained in previous excavations in order to enhance our understanding of this structure, which was the best- preserved Neolithic building at Halai. The assignment was in no way complete at the end of that season, due to the short length of the summer seasons, inaccessibility to relevant publications and finds at the project headquarter in Vivos, as well as to my elementary knowledge regarding the Neolithic period in general. In the months following that season, I increasingly felt that this building was worthy of a more extensive study than the short summer seasons allowed. In April 2002 during my first year of graduate studies at the University of Cincinnati, I approached Professor Jack Davis and Professor Gisela Walberg, as well as Professor Coleman, about the possibility of turning my research of Building III into a Master’s thesis. All of them were very receptive to the idea and I resumed working on the project, but this time in much more depth. I returned to Halai in 2002 for ten days in order to examine the finds and to acquire copies of staff reports and field notebooks. I also returned to Halai in 2003 to study other areas within the Neolithic settlement at Halai. The body of this thesis was written during the 2002-2003 academic year in Cincinnati. While my thesis initially included only the study of Building III and its finds, it was expanded to include an introduction of the Neolithic Period in Central Greece, as a way to supply comparanda and context. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my thanks to my advisors Professor Davis, who was my primary reader of this thesis and advised me on its procedure from beginning to end, and Professor Gisela Walberg, who gave me the initial advice on the possibility of turning this topic into my Master’s thesis. I am also very grateful to Professor John Coleman, who provided me with this topic and granted me permission to use all of the material related to Building III and Halai that is included in this thesis. Many participants at Halai deserve recognition in this work, because this study could not have been produced without their contribution to CHELP and this project. I would like to thank in particular Allyson McDavid, the chief architect at Halai, who provided the drawings and photographs of Building III, Halai palaeoethnobotanist Amy Bogaard who shared her research of the Neolithic plant remains, and lithics expert Professor Evangelia Karimali who re-examined the Building III chipped stone assemblage at my request. I would also like to thank Professor Kerill O’Neill, who proofread this work numerous times. My friends and colleagues at the University of Cincinnati played a crucial role in my completion of this thesis and in providing me with both academic advice and emotional support. All of the errors made in this thesis, however, are of course my own. Lastly I express my gratitude to my parents for their unfailing care and support. It is frustrating to endure many hours of discussion concerning a subject and work in a language that one is completely unfamiliar with; I could not have completed this work without their patience, encouragement and a decade of not losing faith in their daughter on the other side of the globe. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables 3 List of Figures 4 Introduction 5 Chapter I 9 Neolithic in Central Greece 9 History of Research Regarding Neolithic Greece 9 Neolithic Sites Identified in Thessaly and Central Greece 12 The Aceramic Phase in Thessaly and Central Greece 14 The Tripartite Chronological Scheme in Thessaly and Central Greece 16 Settlements and Environment 24 Architecture 30 Obsidian and Trade 35 Summary 36 Chapter II 38 Halai and Building III 38 Site Location and Overview 38 Overview of the Neolithic Remains at Halai 39 Trench F9 in Area F 43 Building III in Trench F9 45 Overview of Building III’s Surroundings and Their Relationship to the Structure 46 1931 Grace Excavation of Building III 47 1992-2002 CHELP Excavation of Building III 49 Project Methodology 54 Chapter III 56 Building III Architecture and Stratigraphy 56 Architecture 56 Doorway and Window 60 Overview of the Interior of Building III 62 Description of the Lots Excavated by CHELP 64 Floors 66 Paved Surfaces 69 Chapter IV 71 Finds from Building III and Neolithic Halai 71 Pottery 71 Bone and Shells 75 Lithics 77 Botanical Remains 78 Radiocarbon Samples 79 Chapter V 81 Discussion – Building III at Halai in Relation to the Neolithic of Central Greece 81 Neolithic Halai 81 Building III 83 Bibliography 89 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Absolute Dates for the Thessalian Neolithic Period .....................................................93 Table 2: Statified Pottery from Building III by EU....................................................................93 Table 3: Unworked Bone from Building III by EU....................................................................95 Table 4: Common Botanical Remains at Halai ..........................................................................96 Table 5: Radiocarbon Results from Building III........................................................................96 LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1: Building III....................................................................................................................97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making Mudbricks: Science and Technology Challenge!
    Making Mudbricks: Science and Technology Challenge! Building with Mud and Stone Soil (mud) has been used to build things for thousands of years. Soil is almost everywhere. This means it is easy to find. When mixed with water and other materials it can be used in lots of ways. The big problem with buildings made from mud is that they can be easily damaged and need regular repair. Most buildings in ancient Amarna were made from mudbrick. Only the most important parts of the city – like the temples – were made of stone. The stone was cut into small blocks called talatat at the nearby quarries. The blocks were designed to be carried by one strong person. Look back at the measuring challenge to figure out how big a talatat block was. It measured one cubit long by half a cubit wide and half a cubit thick. Do you think you would be strong enough to carry one? Mudbricks were used to build all the houses at ancient Amarna, even the house of the King! Mudbricks were much thinner and lighter than stone blocks and varied in size depending on how they were made. At Amarna, mudbricks measured about 34cm long, 17cm wide and 8cm thick. Soil from near the river Nile made the best mudbricks. The mud was mixed with sand and gravel from the desert and water was added to help hold it together. The wet mudbrick mix was then put into a rectangular wooden mould to give it the right shape. The mould was then lifted off the brick which was left in the sun to dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Adobe Mudbrick in Application – Child-Care Centre Construction in El Salvador
    13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 705 IMPROVED ADOBE MUDBRICK IN APPLICATION – CHILD-CARE CENTRE CONSTRUCTION IN EL SALVADOR Dominic DOWLING1 SUMMARY Major earthquakes in Latin America, Asia and The Middle East have served as recent reminders of the vulnerability of traditional adobe (mudbrick) dwellings to the force of earthquakes. A host of research, training and construction projects continue to address this precarious situation and there have been various publications describing the developments in improved adobe (mudbrick) design and construction in recent years. These publications have mostly originated from research institutions and have tended to focus on the technical and experimental details of a variety of improvement systems. The dissemination of this important information is a vital component in the challenge to promote and build safer homes. Furthermore, these advances in technical detail must be accompanied by practical information, which relates to the actual application of the proposed systems, addressing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. This paper attempts to address the current deficiency of this practical information, and thus provide adobe constructors and proponents with a realistic understanding of some of the practical issues related to improved adobe construction. This paper describes the technical and practical aspects and ‘lessons learned’ from a recent improved adobe construction project in El Salvador, as well as drawing on field investigations, laboratory research and other literature. The paper concludes with a proposed addition to the current technical evaluation of the performance of improvement systems: the assessment of the skill level and resources required to effectively incorporate improved adobe systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson #1: Architecture Features Through the Ages
    Unit Two: History of Architecture and Building Codes Lesson #1: Architecture Features Through the Ages Objectives Students will be able to… . Summarize the architecture features through Stone Ages to Neo-Classical Time. Common Core Standards LS 11-12.6 RSIT 11-12.2 RLST 11-12.2 Problem Solving/Critical Thinking 5.4 Health and Safety 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.12 Technical Knowledge and Skills 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 Residential and Commercial Construction Pathway D2.1, D2.8, D2.9, D3.1, D3.2, D3.3, D3.4, D3.7 Responsibility and Leadership 7.4, 9.3 Materials Architecture Features Through the Ages Power Point https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Ab4f485df -0d78-4fa9-9509-0b9ea3e1952c Architecture Features Through the Ages Worksheet Lesson Sequence . Introduce to students that a specific architectural style is characterized by a collection of design details. These details include size and shape of windows, the size and placement of a porch, and the presence or absence of columns. Review the Architecture Features Through the Ages PowerPoint with students. Have students fill in the Architecture Features Through the Ages Worksheet while reviewing the power point. Discuss and answer any questions students may have along the way. © BITA: A program promoted by California Homebuilding Foundation BUILDING INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY: YEAR TWO CURRICULUM Assessment Check for understanding while presenting PowerPoint. Grade student worksheets. Reteach and clarify any misunderstandings as needed. Accommodations/Modifications Check for Understanding One on One Support Peer Support Extra Time If Needed © BITA: A program promoted by California Homebuilding Foundation BUILDING INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY: YEAR TWO CURRICULUM Architecture Features Through the Ages Worksheet As you watch the PowerPoint on Architectural Features Through the Ages fill in summary with the correct answers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indus Valley: Brief Overview of Harappan Civilization  Copyright Bruce Owen 2007
    Emergence of Civilizations / Anthro 341: Class 18 The Indus valley: Brief overview of Harappan civilization Copyright Bruce Owen 2007 − Geographic and ecological setting − A huge area compared to Mesopotamia or Egypt − generally hot and little rainfall − agriculture requires being close enough to a river to benefit from natural flooding, or irrigation, which was only done on a small scale − mostly alluvial soils without mineral resources, like Mesopotamia − although some places have outcrops of stone useful for tools, jewelry, etc. − highly unstable Indus river and its tributaries, shift course frequently − many sites are located along abandoned, dry river beds − rivers are mostly navigable -- encouraging communication and exchange − Pakistan floodplain − combines the best features of Sumerian alluvium and the Nile − topographically similar to Sumer − rivers flood and form natural levees − making irrigation easy with little need for large-scale canal systems − but the floods come at a convenient time, like the Nile − Floods June to September − brings both water and rich silt − allows two different crops per year, without large investment in canals or other works − While flood water is high, plant cotton or sesame − keep water in with low banks − harvest as waters recede − after the flood, plant wheat or barley − enough water remains in soil to support the plants without major additional irrigation − harvest in March to April, a few months before the next flood − this is how people traditionally farmed in the region in recent times, apparently
    [Show full text]
  • Çadir Höyük the 2008 Season Ronald L
    oi.uchicago.edu ÇADIR HÖYÜK ÇADIR HÖYÜK THE 2008 SEASON Ronald L. Gorny Preface Çadır Höyük continues to produce important results from a variety of chronological contexts; these results are providing interesting new materials that are being used by a variety of schol- ars to more fully evaluate the history and culture of the central Anatolian plateau throughout the course of its long history. The 2008 excavation team took to the field for six weeks in July and August and its efforts produced a plethora of fascinating new results. Excavations continue in seven areas with the biggest emphasis being placed on the Northeast Terrace, the Eastern Step Trench, as well as the Upper and Lower South Trenches (fig. 1). These areas have pro- duced vital materials belonging to the Byzantine, Hittite, Iron Age, and Early Bronze Age/ Chalcolithic settlements, respectively. The sounding in the middle of the terrace has also be- come extremely informative for the chronology of that area with occupation there now known to extend at least into the Middle Bronze or Old Assyrian Colony Age. The continuing excavations make it clearer every year that Çadır Höyük was an important site that influenced the area around it and was settled for the entirety of its history with no period of time left unrepresented in the historical account, with the possible exception of the Roman period. Çadır Höyük also displays an apparent continuity of function during this long sequence of settlement that probably accounts for the historical development that we are just beginning to understand. That function is grounded, most likely, on its identification as an important cult center.
    [Show full text]
  • Mud-Brick Architecture
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Mud-Brick Architecture Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4983w678 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Emery, Virginia L. Publication Date 2011-02-19 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California MUD-BRICK ARCHITECTURE عمارة الطوب اللبن Virginia L. Emery EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Emery, 2011, Mud-Brick Architecture. UEE. Full Citation: Emery, Virginia L., 2011, Mud-Brick Architecture. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0026w9hb 1146 Version 1, February 2011 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0026w9hb MUD-BRICK ARCHITECTURE عمارة الطوب اللبن Virginia L. Emery Ziegelarchitektur L’architecture en brique crue Mud-brick architecture, though it has received less academic attention than stone architecture, was in fact the more common of the two in ancient Egypt; unfired brick, made from mud, river, or desert clay, was used as the primary building material for houses throughout Egyptian history and was employed alongside stone in tombs and temples of all eras and regions. Construction of walls and vaults in mud-brick was economical and relatively technically uncomplicated, and mud-brick architecture provided a more comfortable and more adaptable living and working environment when compared to stone buildings. على الرغم أن العمارة بالطوب اللبن تلقت إھتماما أقل من العمارة الحجرية من قِبَل المتخصصين، فقد كانت في الواقع تلك العمارة ھي اﻷكثر شيوعا في مصر القديمة، وكان الطوب اللبن (أوالنيء) المصنوع من الطمي أو الطين الصحراوي مستخدما كمادة بناء بدائية للمنازل على مدار التاريخ المصري واستخدمت إلى جانب الحجارة في المقابر والمعابد في جميع المناطق وخﻻل جميع الفترات.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at Tell Timai 2010 University of Hawaii Season 2 May 20 to 14 July 2010
    Excavations at Tell Timai 2010 University of Hawaii Season 2 May 20 to 14 July 2010 Directors Professor Robert Littman, [email protected] Dr. Jay Silverstein, [email protected] Dr. Nicholas Hudson Dr. Joshua Trampier Summary An archaeological team sponsored by the University of Hawaii led by Professor Robert Littman and Dr. Jay Silverstein conducted, geophysical survey, auger coring, excavations and mapping between May 20 to 14 July 2010. The geophysical survey focused on identifying areas associated with monumental ruins found in the canal on the south edge of the tell in 2009, investigating a possible cemetery area to the southwest, and locating the ancient harbor of Thmuis. A program of auger coring was conducted in the surrounding area of the tell to search for paleochannels of the Mendesian Branch of the Nile. Excavations and mapping focused on phasing the limestone temple in the north, investigating the architectural features revealed by magnetometer survey in the north, to the east of the temple, continuing the cleaning and mapping of the north kiln area excavations, and mapping exposed architecture east of the kiln area and in the area south of the modern cemetery on the west edge of the tell. Some mapping and cleaning was also conducted south of the modern cemetery on the west side of the tell. Results from the 2010 season include indications of two paleochannels of the Mendesian Branch of the Nile, possible evidence of a harbor inlet on the north portion of the tell, phasing and dating of the kiln complex, north temple platform, and the structures located just south of the possible harbor, and structural and topographic mapping across the northern portion of the tell.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehrgarh Neolithic
    Paper presented in the International Seminar on the "First Farmers in Global Perspective', Lucknow, India, 18-20 January, 2006 Mehrgarh Neolithic Jean-Fran¸ois Jarrige From 1975 to 1985, the French Archaeological had already provided a summary of the main results Mission, in collaboration with the Department of brought by the excavations conducted from 1977 Archaeology of Pakistan, has conducted excavations to 1985 in the Neolithic sector of Mehrgarh. in a wide archaeological area near to the modern From 1985 to 1996, the excavations at Mehrgarh village of Mehrgarh in Balochistan at the foot of the were stopped and the French Mission undertook the Bolan Pass, one of the major communication routes excavation of a mound close to the village of between the Iranian Plateau, Central Asia and the Nausharo, 6 miles South of Mehrgarh. This excavation Indus Valley. showed clearly that the mound of Nausharo had Mehrgarh is located in the Bolan Basin, in the north- been occupied from 3000 to 2000 BC. After a western part of the Kachi-Bolan plain, a great alluvial Period I contemporary with Mehrgarh VI and VII, expanse that merges with the Indus Valley (Fig. 1). Periods II and III (c. 2500 to 2000 BC) at Nausharo The site itself is a vast area of about 300 hectares belong to the Indus (or Harappan) civilisation. covered with archaeological remains left by a Therefore the excavations at Nausharo allowed us to continuous sequence of occupations from the 8th to link in the Kachi-Bolan region, the Indus civilisation the 3rd millennium BC. to a continuous sequence of occupations starting from the aceramic Neolithic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Bricks, Sweat and Tears: the Human Investment in Constructing a "Four-Room" House Author(S): Douglas R
    Bricks, Sweat and Tears: The Human Investment in Constructing a "Four-Room" House Author(s): Douglas R. Clark Source: Near Eastern Archaeology, Vol. 66, No. 1/2, House and Home in the Southern Levant (Mar. - Jun., 2003), pp. 34-43 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210930 . Accessed: 29/05/2014 18:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American Schools of Oriental Research is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Near Eastern Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.135.12.127 on Thu, 29 May 2014 18:05:19 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Human Investment in Constructing a "Four-room"House 0 By Douglas R. Clark Next to food T Ihe constructionof stoneand brick four-room houses in the IronI southernLevant was pro- curement, the for extremelylabor-intensive, involving a varietyof tasks.The collection,preparation, pro- quest living quarters that were and of lime and in the duction, transportation application earth, stone, wood, clay protected against the processof buildinga house requiredsignificant time and effort.These requirementswere very intrusion of natural and demandingon villagerswhose subsistence-levelincome forced them to do most of the work human agents occupied a themselves, on top of the day-to-day tasks they performed merely to stay alive and feed major portion of the attention of the ancients.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at Tell Timai 2010
    Excavations at Tell Timai 2011 University of Hawaii Season 3 June 12 to 15 July 2011 Directors: Professor Robert Littman, [email protected] Dr. Jay Silverstein, [email protected] An archaeological team sponsored by the University of Hawaii led by Dr. Jay Silverstein conducted excavations and mapping between 12 June 2011 and 15 July 2011. The archaeological team consisted of 37 scholars from eleven nations with a wide variety of specialists. The archaeological study focused continuing the physical survey and on excavations in two regions of Tell Timai, one in the north and one in the center. In 2007 the Tell Timai Project created a 50 meter grid system used to identify areas on the tell and excavation units are annotated by the 50 meter grid unit that they are located in (Figure 1). During the Tell Timai 2011 season a Sokkia Set 3110 total station and several Pentax autolevels were used to control unit elevations and conduct surface and unit feature mapping. Survey team objectives consisted of: 1. Establishing additional control points in the Timai grid, 2. Mapping unit locations and features relative to the Timai grid, 3. Coreelating magnetometric data collected in 2010, 4. Mapping surface features visible in several MSA salvage units excavated in 2010, 5. Organizing site-related spatial data within three project geodatabases. Four new 5-x-5 meter units and one exploratory trench were excavated in the north with the following objectives: 1. Determine the extent, chronology, and relationship of buildings and architecture to the Temple foundation at Grid M6, 2. To refine the circumstances and chronology of the destruction and construction episodes that occurred in the 2nd century BCE, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Enigmatic Circular Mud Brick Structures in the Western Field at Giza
    THE OLD KINGDOM ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE HELD IN PRAGUE, MAY 31 – JUNE 4, 2004 Miroslav Bárta editor Czech Institute of Egyptology Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague Academia Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague 2006 OOKAApodruhéKAApodruhé sstrtr ii–xii.indd–xii.indd 3 99.3.2007.3.2007 117:18:217:18:21 Contributors Nicole Alexanian, James P. Allen, Susan Allen, Hartwig Altenmüller, Tarek El Awady, Miroslav Bárta, Edith Bernhauer, Edward Brovarski, Vivienne G. Callender, Vassil Dobrev, Laurel Flentye, Rita Freed, Julia Harvey, Salima Ikram, Peter Jánosi, Nozomu Kawai, Jaromír Krejčí, Kamil O. Kuraszkiewicz, Renata Landgráfová, Serena Love, Dušan Magdolen, Peter Der Manuelian, Ian Mathieson, Karol Myśliwiec, Stephen R. Phillips, Gabriele Pieke, Ann Macy Roth, Joanne M. Rowland, Regine Schulz, Yayoi Shirai, Nigel Strudwick, Miroslav Verner, Hana Vymazalová, Sakuji Yoshimura, Christiane Ziegler © Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, 2006 ISBN 80-200-1465-9 OOKAApodruhéKAApodruhé sstrtr ii–xii.indd–xii.indd 4 99.3.2007.3.2007 117:18:217:18:21 Contents Foreword ix Bibliography xi Tomb and social status. The textual evidence 1 Nicole Alexanian Some aspects of the non-royal afterlife in the Old Kingdom 9 James P. Allen Miniature and model vessels in Ancient Egypt 19 Susan Allen Presenting the nDt-Hr-offerings to the tomb owner 25 Hartwig Altenmüller King Sahura with the precious trees from Punt in a unique scene! 37 Tarek El Awady The Sixth Dynasty tombs in Abusir. Tomb complex of the vizier Qar and his family 45 Miroslav Bárta Die Statuen mit Papyrusrolle im Alten Reich 63 Edith Bernhauer False doors & history: the Sixth Dynasty 71 Edward Brovarski The iconography of the princess in the Old Kingdom 119 Vivienne G.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Identity in the Indus Civilization: a Multi-Site Isotopic Mortuary Analysis
    IMMIGRANT IDENTITY IN THE INDUS CIVILIZATION: A MULTI-SITE ISOTOPIC MORTUARY ANALYSIS By BENJAMIN THOMAS VALENTINE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Benjamin Thomas Valentine 2 To Shannon 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Truly, I have stood on the shoulders of my betters to reach this point in my career. I could never have completed this dissertation without the unfailing support of my family, friends, and colleagues, both at home and abroad. I am grateful, most of all, for my wife, Shannon Chillingworth. I am humbled by the sacrifices she has made for dreams not her own. I can never repay her for the gifts she has given me, nor will she ever call my debt due. Shannon—thank you. I am likewise indebted to the scholars and institutions that have facilitated my graduate research these past eight years. Foremost among them is my faculty advisor, John Krigbaum, who took a chance on me, an aspiring researcher with little anthropological training, and welcomed me into the University of Florida (UF) Bone Chemistry Lab. I have worked hard not to fail him, as he has never failed me. Under John Krigbaum’s mentorship, I have earned my chance to succeed in academe. During my time at UF, I have benefited from the efforts of many excellent faculty members, but I am especially grateful to James Davidson, Department of Anthropology and George Kamenov and Jason Curtis, Department of Geological Sciences.
    [Show full text]