FCPP and Navajo Mine Energy Project, Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FCPP and Navajo Mine Energy Project, Final Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 4.1 Air Quality The proposed project is located in the Four Corners region of northwestern New Mexico within the San Juan Air Basin (Figure 4.1-1). This air basin comprises the Four Corners region of northwest New Mexico, southwest Colorado, southeast Utah, and northeast Arizona. For the purposes of this EIS, the Proposed Action area encompasses a 300-kilometer (km) (186-mile) radius from FCPP, which includes the Navajo and Hopi tribal trust lands, consistent with EPA’s area of evaluation for the FIP for FCPP. San Juan Basin air quality is generally good and meets EPA ambient air quality standards. Primary issues of concern in this region include regional haze and visibility issues, as well as the potential deposition of metals from air to soil and water as a result of industrial air emissions. The Navajo Mine and FCPP are located on Navajo tribal trust land; therefore, air emissions and air quality are under the jurisdiction of the NNEPA) and overseen by the EPA Region IX in San Francisco.1 Federal and tribal law defines criteria pollutants to include the following: reactive or volatile organic compounds (ROCs or VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOX as NO and NO2), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), respirable particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Of these, VOCs and NOX are precursors of ground-level photochemical O3, which can result in decreased visibility and haze. In addition, the EPA published a Final Ruling regarding the Source Specific FIP to implement BART at the FCPP in August 2012, which provides requirements for future operation of the plant. The FIP and associated BART requirements have been determined and as such comprise part of the environmental baseline for assessing the consequences of the Proposed Action and alternatives. A detailed discussion of the regulatory framework regarding air quality and air emissions as applicable to the proposed Project is provided below. Coal mining would cause air emissions from combustion of motor fuels (diesel and gasoline) used to operate mining equipment, portable equipment, and support vehicles. Mining activities also cause air emissions from explosives detonation (NO2, SO2, and CO) and fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) from earthmoving activities. Power plant operation and maintenance would cause air emissions from the combustion of coal in boilers as well as motor fuels (diesel and gasoline) used in off-road equipment, portable equipment, and support vehicles. Support activities include switchyard and transmission line maintenance near the plant. Several quantitative models were conducted to evaluate the potential air quality impacts of the Proposed Action and alternatives. These include calculations of mobile and stationary source emissions in comparison to Federal standards, air deposition modeling, O3 Assessment; and plume visibility. Each of these models, their results, and implications with regard to potential impacts are described in the environmental consequences section. Human health risk assessment of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), diesel particulate matter, and fugitive dust are presented in Section 4.17, Health and Safety. These issues are also mentioned in this section. 4.1.1 Regulatory Compliance Framework 4.1.1.1 Air Quality Standards Air quality in a given location is determined by the concentration of various pollutants in the atmosphere. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) have been established by the EPA under the CAA of 1970 (amended 1977 and 1990, 42 USC 7401 et seq.). The NAAQS represent maximum levels of background pollution that are considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health (primary standards) and welfare (secondary standards such as diminished production and quality of agricultural crops, reduced visibility, degraded soils, materials and infrastructure damage, and damaged 1 In 2005, the Nation and owners of the FCPP entered into a VCA under which FCPP agreed to apply for and obtain a CAA Title V operating permit from NNEPA provided, among other things, that permit requirements would be no more stringent than federal requirements unless FCPP agreed to more stringent requirements and the administration and enforcement of the permit would be no more stringent than what EPA would do and that would be required under federal court decisions. May 2015 Air Quality 4.1-1 Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement vegetation). Recently, the EPA has proposed developing new secondary standards for SO2 and NOX aimed at reducing the impacts of atmospheric deposition on surface waters (Government Accounting Office [GAO] 2013). Individual states have the option to adopt more stringent standards and to include other pollution sources. However, all states in the Four Corners region – New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, and Colorado – have adopted NAAQS in lieu of adopting more stringent state standards. Also, the sovereign nations – Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, and Southern Ute Indian Tribe – use NAAQS as tribal standards. The Navajo Mine and FCPP are located on Navajo tribal trust lands; therefore, air emissions and air quality are under the jurisdiction of the NNEPA and overseen by the EPA Region IX in San Francisco. Federal and tribal law defines criteria pollutants to include O3, NO2, CO, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and lead (Pb). Elimination of tetraethyl lead in motor gasoline has eliminated emissions of Pb from vehicles and portable equipment, although tetraethyl lead is still used in some types of aviation gasoline. O3 is not directly emitted, rather, its precursors NOX and VOC are the pollutants which react with sunlight to form ground- level photochemical O3 and contribute to regional haze, along with SO2 and particulate matter. Criteria emissions – also referred to as regulated pollutants – caused by the Action include ROCs or VOCs, NOX as NO and NO2, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5. Each pollutant is described below. Ozone (O3) Ground-level O3 is a secondary pollutant formed in the atmosphere by a series of complex chemical reactions and transformations in the presence of sunlight. NOX and VOCs are the principal constituents in these reactions. An important source of NOX and VOC emissions is the high-temperature combustion of fossil fuels such as in motor vehicle engines and power plant boilers. Thus, regulation and control of NOX and VOCs from these sources is essential to reduce the formation of ground-level O3. O3 is a strong irritating gas that can chemically burn and cause narrowing of airways, forcing the lungs and heart to work harder to provide oxygen to the body. A powerful oxidant, O3 is capable of destroying organic matter, including human lung and airway tissue. O3 damages cells in the lungs, making the passages inflamed and swollen. O3 also causes shortness of breath, nasal congestion, coughing, eye irritation, sore throat, headache, chest discomfort, breathing pain, throat dryness, wheezing, fatigue, and nausea. It can damage alveoli, the individual air sacs in the lungs where oxygen and CO2 are exchanged. O3 has been associated with a decrease in resistance to infections. People most likely to be affected by O3 include the elderly, the young, and athletes. O3 may pose its worst health threat to people who already suffer from respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis (VCAPCD 2003). Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) NO2 is formed in the atmosphere primarily by the rapid reaction of the colorless gas nitric oxide (NO) with atmospheric oxygen. It is a reddish brown gas with an odor similar to that of bleach. NO2 participates in the photochemical reactions that result in O3. The greatest source of NO, and subsequently NO2, is the high-temperature combustion of fossil fuels such as in motor vehicle engines and power plant boilers. NO2 and NO are referred to collectively as NOX. NO2 can irritate and damage the lungs, cause bronchitis and pneumonia, and lower resistance to respiratory infections such as influenza. Researchers have identified harmful effects, similar to those caused by ozone, with progressive changes over four hours of exposure causing impaired pulmonary function, increased incidence of acute respiratory disease, and difficult breathing for both bronchitis sufferers and healthy persons (Ventura County Air Pollution Control District [VCAPCD] 2003). 4.1-2 Air Quality May 2015 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Carbon Monoxide (CO) CO is a common, colorless, odorless, highly toxic gas. It is produced by natural and anthropogenic (caused by human activity) combustion processes. The major source of CO is incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels (primarily gasoline, diesel fuel, natural gas, and coal). However, it also results from combustion processes including forest fires and agricultural burning. Ambient CO concentrations are generally higher in the winter, usually on cold, clear days and nights with little or no wind. Low wind speeds inhibit horizontal dispersion, and surface inversions inhibit vertical mixing. Traffic-congested intersections have the potential to result in localized high CO levels. When inhaled, CO does not directly harm the lungs. The impact from CO is on oxygenation of the entire body. CO combines chemically with hemoglobin, the oxygen transporting component of blood. This diminishes the ability of blood to carry oxygen to the brain, heart, and other vital organs. Red blood cells have 220 times the attraction for CO as for oxygen. This affinity interferes with movement of oxygen to the body’s tissues. Effects from CO exposure include headaches, nausea, and death. People with heart ailments are at risk from low-level exposure to CO. Also sensitive are people with chronic respiratory disease, the elderly, infants and fetuses, and people suffering from anemia and other conditions that affect the oxygen carrying capacity of blood. High CO levels in a concentrated area can result in asphyxiation.
Recommended publications
  • Origin of Non-Bedded Pyroclastic Rocks in the Cathedral Cliff Diatreme, Navajo Volcanic Field, New Mexico
    The following document is a pre-print version of: Bélanger C, Ross P-S (2018) Origin of nonbedded pyroclastic rocks in the Cathedral Cliff diatreme, Navajo volcanic field, New Mexico. Bull. Volc. 80:article 61, DOI 10.1007/s00445-018-1234-0 Origin of non-bedded pyroclastic rocks in the Cathedral Cliff diatreme, Navajo volcanic field, New Mexico Caroline Bélanger*, Pierre-Simon Ross Institut national de la recherche scientifique, 490 rue de la Couronne, Québec (Qc), G1K 9A9, Canada * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Bélanger), [email protected] (P.-S. Ross) Keywords : Diatreme, non-bedded pyroclastic rocks, phreatomagmatic, Navajo volcanic field Abstract Cathedral Cliff is a well exposed mid-Tertiary phreatomagmatic diatreme in the Navajo volcanic field, New Mexico. Post-eruptive erosion, estimated between 500 m and 1000 m, exposes the deep part of the diatreme. Cathedral Cliff provides an opportunity to examine the transition between the bedded pyroclastic rocks of an upper diatreme, and the non-bedded pyroclastic rocks of the subjacent lower diatreme. Bedded pyroclastic rocks occupy 49% of the mapped diatreme area, non-bedded pyroclastic rocks occupy 45%, and the remaining 6% consists of sedimentary megablocks. The bedded pyroclastic rocks range from coarse tuff to medium lapilli tuff, and from lithic to juvenile rich. They were emplaced during eruption at the bottom of the crater by pyroclastic density currents, pyroclastic fallout, and as ballistic bombs and blocks. As the eruption continued, they subsided into the diatreme to their current location. Bedding ranges from well-preserved (“continuous beds”) to partially destroyed (“broken beds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanologie Du Diatrème De Cathedral Cliff, Champ Volcanique Navajo, Nouveau-Mexique
    Université du Québec Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre Eau Terre Environnement VOLCANOLOGIE DU DIATRÈME DE CATHEDRAL CLIFF, CHAMP VOLCANIQUE NAVAJO, NOUVEAU-MEXIQUE Par Caroline Bélanger Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention du grade de Maître ès sciences (M.Sc.) en Sciences de la Terre Jury d’évaluation Examinateur externe John Stix Université McGill Examinateur interne et Michel Malo président du jury INRS Centre Eau Terre Environnement Directeur de recherche Pierre-Simon Ross INRS Centre Eau Terre Environnement © Droits réservés de Caroline Bélanger, 2017 ii RÉSUMÉ Les maars-diatrèmes sont des volcans subaériens caractéristiques des champs volcaniques continentaux monogénétiques ayant des compositions ultramafiques à felsiques. Ces volcans sont le résultat d’éruptions phréatomagmatiques provenant de l’interaction explosive entre le magma et de l’eau souterraine ou entre le magma et des sédiments saturés en eau. La majorité des études portant sur les maars-diatrèmes décrivent le cratère et l’anneau pyroclastique qui l’entoure, fournissant seulement de l’information sur une partie des processus volcaniques ayant lieu dans le diatrème, car plusieurs explosions n’éjectent pas du matériel jusqu’à l’atmosphère. L’étude de diatrèmes est alors nécessaire pour bien comprendre les différents processus volcaniques ayant lieu plus en profondeur. Ce projet de maîtrise porte sur Cathedral Cliff, un diatrème Tertiaire exposé dans le champ volcanique Navajo, au Nouveau-Mexique. Une érosion post-éruptive estimée entre 500 m et 1000 m permet d’exposer la partie plus profonde du diatrème. Cathedral Cliff offre une opportunité d’étudier la transition entre les dépôts pyroclastiques lités, du diatrème supérieur, et les dépôts pyroclastiques non-lités, du diatrème inférieur.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Study of Xenoliths from the Navajo
    - - - - - - • Geochemical study of xenoliths from the ­ Navajo Volcanic Field; - Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah - .. -.. -.. ..- - by • Patrick D. Mattie - .. - -- • - A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master of Science in Geochemistry - November, 1996 .. - .. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology .. - Socorro, New Mexico, USA - - - Abstract - The Navajo Volcanic Field offers a unique area to study mafic xenoliths due to an - abundance of dikes and diatremes with associated crustal xenoliths. Mafic xenoliths in - kimberlite pipes and minette diatremes in the Navajo Volcanic Field are of four - lithologic types, in order of decreasing abundance: garnet granulite, amphibolite, - pyroxene granulite, and gabbro. Mafic xenoliths from 3 kimberlites and 3 minettes - define eight geochemical groups, of which Groups I and III occur only in Moses Rock dike - (gabbros) and Red Mesa pipe (amphibolites), respectively. With these two exceptions, - there is no correlation of chemical groups with xenolith or host-rock lithology, - geographic location, or degree of xenolith alteration or metamorphism. - - Group I (n=8) with high Mg numbers (0.7-0.8) and high CaO/Ti02(20-60) and low - Ti02 «0.5wt%), shows only slight chondrite-normalized LREE enrichment, and a strong subduction zone component (SZC) (depletion in Nb and Ta relative to neighboring - incompatible elements) and positive Sr, Ba, Eu, and K (SBEK) anomalies on primitive - mantle normalized spidergrams. Group II (n=5) with intermediate CaO/Ti02 (10-20) and Ti02 (0.5-0.9 wt%) has flat to LREE depleted patterns, a SZC and SBEK anomalies. - Group III (n=3) with very high CaO/Ti02 (40-60) and low Ti02 « 0.5 wt%) has nearly flat REE patterns, a very prominent SZC and large SBEK anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • FCPP and Navajo Mine Energy Project, Final
    Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 4.16 Recreation Recreational resources for the purposes of this EIS are generally defined as recreational activities such as wildlife viewing, hunting, fishing, picnicking, hiking, and sightseeing, and the publicly accessible facilities and land areas that provide these recreational opportunities. The primary ROI examined for recreational resources encompasses the ROI associated with the Navajo Mine, which includes the Navajo Mine and Pinabete SMCRA Permit Areas, the FCPP, and the ROWs associated with the four transmission lines (see Section 1.1). In addition, the ROI includes regional recreational resources within the Four Corners region generally within 15 to 20 miles of the Navajo Mine and FCPP and approximately 5 miles from the transmission line ROWs. The regional recreational resources ROI is the general viewing area in which the Project features and activities could indirectly affect recreational opportunities and experiences. This ROI is consistent with the BLM’s VRM Process (BLM 2012b), which defines distant or seldom seen views at greater than 15 miles from the proposed activities (see also Section 4.13, Visual Resources). 4.16.1 Regulatory Compliance Framework 4.16.1.1 Navajo Nation Recreation Management The Navajo Nation requires permits for all recreation-related activities on the Navajo Nation tribal trust lands. The Navajo Parks and Recreation Department issues camping, hiking, or backcountry permits (Navajo Nation Parks and Recreation 2012a). Hunting and fishing permits are issued by the NNDFW. The area within 10 miles of the Pinabete SMCRA Permit Area and the FCPP is within Navajo Nation Hunting Unit 13, which is managed for archery, muzzleloader, and rifle deer and elk hunts (NNDFW 2012a).
    [Show full text]