Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council
Contents
1 Essential Information 6 Why comment on the Site Allocations Development Plan Document? 6 How to comment 6 Consultation Events 7 Terms used in the Documents 7 2 Introduction 8 Purpose of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document 8 The Proposals Map 10 Purpose of this Potential Options Document 10 Sustainability Appraisal 10 How we have arrived at this stage 10 How do I get involved? 13 How will my comments be used? 13 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
Contents
3 Site Allocations and Notations 14 Managing Growth 14 Topic 1 - Green Belt Boundary 14 Overview 14 Objectives 14 Criteria for Defining 15 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 15 Site Allocation 1 – Green Belt (Maps 1-5, 11, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23-25, 27, 15 29-31, 33) Rejected Options 16 Topic 2 - Settlement Boundaries 16 Overview 16 Objectives 16 Criteria for Defining 17 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 18 Site Allocations 2-28 - Settlement Boundaries (Maps in Section 6) 18 Rejected Options 20 Topic 3 – Sustainable Transport 20 Park and Ride 20 Overview 20 Objectives 20 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 21 Site Allocation 29 – Widford Park and Ride Area of Search (Map 3) 21 Rejected Options 21 Cycleways and footpaths 21 Overview 21 Objectives 21 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 21 Site Allocation 30 – Proposed Cycle Routes (Maps 2, 3, 4, 7, 27, 33) 21 Rejected Options 21 Road proposals 22 Topic 4 - Special Policy Areas 22 Overview 22 Objectives 22 Site Allocation 31 - Great Leighs Racecourse (Map 1) 23 Site Allocation 32 - Sandford Mill (Map 3) 23 Site Allocation 33 - Hanningfield Reservoir Treatment Works (Map 31) 23 Site Allocation 34 - Writtle College (Map 33) 23 Criteria for Defining 23 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 24 Rejected Options 24 Environmental Protection and Enhancement 25 Topic 5 - Green Wedges 25 Overview 26 Objectives 26 Criteria for Defining 26 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 27 Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council
Contents
Site Allocation 35 - River Chelmer North Green Wedge (Map 3) 27 Site Allocation 36 - River Chelmer/Blackwater Navigation East Green Wedge 27 (Map 3) Site Allocation 37 - River Can/ Wid West Green Wedge (Map 1, 3 and 33) 27 Rejected Options 28 Topic 6 – Coastal Protection Belt 28 Overview 28 Objectives 28 Criteria for Defining 28 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 29 Site Allocation 38 – Coastal Protection Belt (Map 2, 4, 5) 29 Rejected Options 29 Topic 7 – Protected Lanes 29 Overview 29 Objectives 29 Assessment Criteria 30 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 30 Site Allocations 39-92 - Protected Lanes (Maps 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 19, 29, 31 30, 31, 33) Rejected Options 33 Topic 8 – Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme 34 Overview 34 Objectives 34 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 34 Site Allocation 93 – Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme (Map 3, 20) 34 Rejected Options 35 Balanced Communities 36 Topic 9 - Housing Proposal Sites 36 Overview 36 Objectives 36 Criteria for Defining 37 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 37 Site Allocations 94-117 - Housing Proposal Sites (Maps 3, 4, 11, 13, 21, 23, 33) 37 Rejected Options 42 Topic 10 – Proposed Affordable Housing Sites 42 Overview 42 Objectives 43 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 43 Site Allocations 118-127 - Proposed Affordable Housing Sites (Maps 3, 6, 9, 44 10, 15, 20, 26, 27, 31) Rejected Options 44 Topic 11 – Specialist Residential Accommodation 45 Overview 45 Objectives 45 Criteria for Defining 46 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 46 Site Allocation 128 - Waltham Road, Boreham (Map 7) 46 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
Contents
Site Allocation 129 - Saint Giles, Moor Hall Lane, Bicknacre (Map 6) 46 Site Allocation 130 – Morelands Industrial Estate, Tileworks Lane, East 46 Hanningfield (Map 21) Rejected Options 46 Topic 12 – Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople 47 Accommodation Overview 47 Objectives 48 Criteria for Selecting Sites 48 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 48 Call for Gypsy and Traveller Sites 48 Call for Travelling Showpeople Sites 49 Economic Prosperity 50 Topic 13 – Employment Areas 50 Overview 50 Objectives 50 Criteria for defining Employment Areas 51 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 51 Temple Farm, West Hanningfield 51 Banters Lane, Great Leighs 52 Beehive Lane Industrial Area (Beehive Works), Great Baddow 52 Site Allocations 131-153 - Employment Areas (Maps 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, 15, 52 30) Rejected Options 53 Topic 14 – Neighbourhood Centres 54 Overview 54 Objectives 54 Criteria for Defining Retail Frontages 54 Defining Principal Neighbourhood Centres Boundaries 55 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 55 Site Allocations 154-181 - Neighbourhood Centres (Maps 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 13, 23, 55 29, 33) Rejected Options 56 Quality of Life 58 Topic 15 – Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision 58 Overview 58 Objectives 58 Criteria for Defining 59 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 59 Site Allocations 182-189 - Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision (See 59 all Maps) Rejected Options 60 Topic 16 – Community Facilities 61 Overview 61 Objectives 61 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 61 Rejected Options 61 Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council
Contents
Minerals and Waste 62 Topic 17 - Minerals and Waste 62 Overview 62 Objectives 62 The Borough Council’s Potential Option 63 Rejected Options 63 4 Monitoring and Implementation 64 Introduction 64 Overall steering and monitoring 64 Inter-dependencies 64 Delivering excellent development for sustainable communities 65 5 Appendices 66 (A) Information Required for Site Submissions 66 (B) List of Site Allocations and Designations 67 (C) Abbreviations 74 (D) Schedule of Core Strategy Policies 76 (E) Reasons for the Potential and Rejected Sites for Housing and 80 Affordable Housing 6 Mapping 90 6 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
1 Essential Information
Part 1 Essential Information
Why comment on the Site Allocations Development Plan Document?
1.1 The purpose of this Site Allocations Development Plan Document (SADPD for short) is to allocate land for a range of uses to support the spatial vision and objectives of the Borough Council’s Adopted Core Strategy. It will include sites for development including housing, employment and transport infrastructure and site designations primarily for environmental protection including Coastal Protection Belt and open space.
1.2 The Site Allocations Development Plan Document will consider sites within the whole of the Borough, excluding Chelmsford Town Centre and North Chelmsford, which are dealt with via separate Area Action Plans (CTCAAP and NCAAP).
1.3 This is the second stage of community consultation on the Site Allocations Development Plan Document and seeks to test the Borough Council’s potential options for different site allocations and notations. Community involvement at this stage is considered very important to enable us to have YOUR views on the potential options and whether there are any OTHER sites and/or land uses that should be considered for the benefit of the local area.
1.4 Comments from this consultation will be used to inform the Borough Council’s FINAL SADPD (Proposed Submission) due to be consulted on in 2010. Before this, further consultation on potential sites for new Gyspy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation will be undertaken.
How to comment
1.5 The consultation on Potential Options will be between 27th October and 4.45pm on 21st December 2009. There are a number of ways to comment:
You are encouraged to comment online using our NEW consultation portal http://consult.chelmsford.gov.uk This allows you to submit comments on any aspect of the document quickly and easily and helps us capture your views in the most efficient way Alternatively you can complete a consultation response form, which is available from the Planning Policy Team (contact details below) Representations can also be made by post to SADPD Representations, Planning Policy, Directorate of Sustainable Communities, Chelmsford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Duke Street, Chelmsford, CM1 1JE or by email to [email protected]
If you do not have access to the internet, hard copies of the consultation response form and Potential Options documentation are available on request by telephoning 01245 606330. They are also available for inspection during normal office hours from the Borough Council’s Planning Reception (Civic Centre, Chelmsford) the South Woodham Ferrers Information Centre (Baron Road, South Woodham Ferrers), all libraries in the Borough and at Parish Offices and/ or Parish Clerks.
1.6 We are seeking comments on all aspects of the document although you can comment on as little or as much as you chose. References have been given to each of the site allocation and these should be quoted when submitting comments/ making representations.
1.7 Information required for site submissions is set out in Appendix A. This should be used when proposing a site that is not currently contained within this Potential Options document.
Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 7
Essential Information 1
Please note: Representations made on the Potential Options document cannot be treated as confidential and will be made available for public inspection. We are unable to accept any representations received outside the formal 8-week period.
Consultation Events
1.8 To support the publication of this Potential Options document, and in line with the Borough Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement, the Borough Council, will also be holding a series of exhibitions and drop-in events, the details for which are set out on our website and published locally.
Terms used in the Documents
1.9 This is a consultation document and so wherever possible the use of jargon and technical language has been avoided. There are, however, a number of important terms which have a specific meaning in planning matters and could not be avoided. These are explained in the Abbreviations in the Appendix C.
Picture 1 Chelmsford Business Park 8 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
2 Introduction
Part 2 Introduction
2.1 The Local Development Framework (LDF) contains a number of separate planning documents, of which the Site Allocations Development Plan Document (SADPD) is one, that address the Borough’s planning and development needs up to 2021. The Adopted Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document (Core Strategy for short) provides the long-term vision, principles, strategic objectives and Spatial Strategy for managing development growth in the Borough and provides the strategic context for the SADPD.
2.2 Picture 2 – Chelmsford Borough Local Development Framework (LDF)
Picture 2
2.3 The Adopted Core Strategy is the most strategic LDF document and was the first to be adopted. However, it does not identify specific sites. The Site Allocations Development Plan Document takes forward elements of the Core Strategy at the more detailed site-specific level for the bulk of the Borough excluding the areas covered by the Chelmsford Town Centre and North Chelmsford AAPs. The LDF diagram above at Picture 1 identifies the relationship of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document to other LDF documents. It is one of the last Development Plan Documents (DPDs) to be prepared by the Borough Council.
Purpose of the Site Allocations Development Plan Document
2.4 The Site Allocations Development Plan Document is concerned with the delivery of the Adopted Core Strategy. There are a number of relevant Core Strategy policies and overall principles, and strategy, which will be developed further through the SADPD. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 9
Introduction 2
2.5 SADPD will provide a framework for clear and consistent decision making by providing clear site allocations. It will manage change by designating areas for protection including the Green Belt and Protected Lanes and by allocating land for specific types of development including new housing and employment. It also sets out the main constraints which will affect decision-making on planning applications and guidance for specific sites or areas including Special Policy Areas. The role and format reflects Government guidelines as set out in Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12) and its associated Plan Making Manual.
2.6 The ‘allocation’ of land for development does not replace the need for planning permission. It is an expression of policy against which (amongst other things) planning applications will ultimately be determined. The current policies are contained in the Adopted Core Strategy and the weight to be attached to the proposals in the SADPD will increase as it nears adoption (see Picture 3). The SADPD does not introduce new policy but attributes an allocation to those contained in the Core Strategy.
2.7 The SADPD takes account of the development needs of the Borough in the period 2001 to 2021. This means that it is expected that the proposals will be implemented, following adoption of the document before 2021. Being already well into that period, account has been taken of the development that has already taken place.
2.8 Picture 3: Stages in preparing the SADPD
Please note that further consultation on potential sites for new Gyspy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation will be undertaken prior to consultation on the Proposed Submission SADPD. See also Topic 12.
Picture 3 10 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
2 Introduction
The Proposals Map
2.9 The SADPD uses a Proposal Map and inset maps to illustrate sites proposed for development or protection. These are contained in Section 6 and the document sleeve.
Purpose of this Potential Options Document
2.10 This Potential Options is a second stage discussion document. It seeks your views on the sites included for development or protection. It should be borne in mind that inclusion of a particular site in this document does not imply that the Borough Council is committed to its allocation for new development or protection at this stage. However, the Borough Council does consider that all the sites included have sufficient potential to justify inclusion in a public consultation exercise at this point in the SADPD preparation process. This Potential Options document has been informed by the comments received during the first stage of consultation on Issues and Options undertaken in 2007.
2.11 Consultation on the Potential Options SADPD is critical in ensuring the Proposed Submitted version is fully informed by the local community and stakeholders. The Borough Council is therefore seeking views on the Potential Options and whether there are any OTHER sites and/or land uses that should be considered for the benefit of the local area before final decisions are made.
Sustainability Appraisal
2.12 Legislation requires that the SADPD is prepared with a view to contributing to the achievement of sustainable development. To this end a Integrated Sustainability Appraisal (SA) has been prepared to accompany this document. This is a systematic process to appraise the social, environmental and economic effects of plan allocations and designations and make transparent why the potential options have been selected.
2.13 The SA has been prepared by independent consultants Entec UK Ltd and is available to download from the Borough Council’s website. It should be read alongside this SADPD and is also published for consultation.
How we have arrived at this stage
2.14 The production of the SADPD goes through a number of stages set out in national legislation as shown in Picture 2. This sequence of steps seeks to ensure that views are sought and taken into account at the earliest stage of plan preparation and in summer 2007 the Issues and Options consultation was undertaken. This initial consultation enabled the Borough Council to identify key issues and test various options with the public and stakeholders and against key sustainability principles. The results of the consultation have been used to inform this Potential Options document.
2.15 Over 220 representations were received to the Issues and Options consultation. More details on the consultation and the main issues raised in responses is set out in a Feedback Document. This is available on our website and summarised below.
2.16 Additionally there has been liaison and discussion with various agencies including Essex County Council regarding site allocations and designations.
2.17 This results of the Issues and Options consultation and additional informal consultation has been used to prepare this Potential Options document. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 11
Introduction 2
2.18 Main issues raised during the Issues and Options Consultation:
General support for the designation of Green Wedges The Coastal Protection Belt should not be changed A number of suggestions for the designation of Protected Lanes Some suggestions for detailed boundaries for the Boreham Airfield and Marsh Farm Country Parks Strong support for protection of the Metropolitan Green Belt, but with some support for small scale boundary revisions to accommodate local needs affordable housing General support for the proposed designation of Good Easter, Edney Common and Chatham Green as Defined Settlements Many detailed submissions for boundary revisions affecting existing Defined Settlements, some concerning changes already “on the ground” Generally, very little support for minor changes to the urban area boundaries of Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers, but there are a number of developer and landowner submissions seeking such changes Generally, support for more housing developments within the existing urban areas of Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers, including a number of developer/landowner submissions Support for the Borough Council’s principles on defining settlement boundaries Mixed responses on whether, and where, additional specialist housing should be located Mixed responses on the location of new Gypsy and Traveller sites Support for, and suggestions for, the location of further Park and Ride sites Generally support for, and detailed suggestions, for bus priority and rapid transit schemes Support for new footpaths and cycleways, with a number of detailed suggestions General support for the retention of existing employment areas and the proposed new employment areas – with a number of developer submissions seeking extensions to areas, for example Widford Industrial Estate Various detailed comments regarding the boundaries and access arrangements for the proposed new employment area at Temple Farm The notation of neighbourhood shopping centres is largely supported, with some suggestions for further such designations Mixed responses on meeting the need for education, health, leisure and other community facilities, with some specific requirements identified in certain areas Some detailed comments on the boundaries and permitted uses at the proposed Special Policy Areas
2.19 How to use this document
The document is divided into the following sections:
Section 1 Provides Essential Information on the SADPD and how to comment
Section 2 Provides the Introduction for the consultation document, explains the role of SADPD and the purpose of the Potential Options, how the Borough Council has reached this stage and how to comment 12 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
2 Introduction
Section 3 Sets out the Borough Council’s Potential Options for different site allocations and notations. These are presented under themes of the Adopted Core Strategy (e.g. Managing Growth, Environmental Protection and Enhancement, Balanced Communities etc.) and include other options considered
Section 4 Sets out the framework for monitoring and implementing the Plan
Section 5 Appendices
Section 6 Includes a series of maps to show the potential site allocations and area designations
2.20 The site allocations and designations for consideration in this document are presented under the same main themes as the Adopted Core Strategy. These are as follows:
Core Strategy Area SADPD Topic
Managing Growth Green Belt Boundary Settlement Boundaries Sustainable Transport Special Policy Areas
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Green Wedges Coastal Protection Belt Protected Lanes Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme
Balanced Communities Housing Proposal Sites Proposed Affordable Housing Sites Specialist Residential Accommodation Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation
Economic Prosperity Employment Areas Neighbourhood Centres
Quality of Life Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision Community Facilities
Minerals and Waste Minerals and Waste
2.21 Each site allocation and notation with potential for either development or protection is listed in Appendix B. The sites include those:
That appear to the Borough Council to merit consideration Proposed by external parties such as developers/ agents, Parish Councils and private individuals during previous consultations Identified in the Adopted Core Strategy Identified through a consultant study such as the Urban Capacity Study 2007 and Protected Lanes Review 2009.
2.22 Each site is expanded upon under various SADPD site allocations and notations in Section 3. This outlines the following information for each site: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 13
Introduction 2
Its role in implementing and delivering the Core Strategy The Borough Council’s objectives The Potential Option for its allocation/ designation on the Proposals Map. References to main relevant maps is also given. Where other options were considered, these and the reasons for their rejection Background information including references to Core Strategy policies and key evidence base material which has informed the potential options. A full list of Core Strategy policies is included in Appendix D.
2.23 A full list of all site allocations and designations is given in Appendix B. The sites put forward are considered to be well founded, based on a sound appraisal of their sustainability and deliverable. Further information on the selection of sites is given in Section 3.
2.24 There are some SADPD Topics in this Potential Options document which are decided through other plans and legislation. Examples of this are sites for Minerals and Waste processing and the preferred route for the Chelmsford North East By-pass, which all fall within the scope of Essex County Council’s planning functions. However this document includes these designations in order to provide a complete picture of the other proposals that may occur in the Borough to 2021.
2.25 A Proposals Map with inset maps showing the various allocations and notations referred to in the text are presented in Section 6 and the document sleeve.
2.26 This document should also be read in conjunction with the Sustainability Appraisal. It may also be helpful to refer to the Adopted Core Strategy, NCAAP and the SADPD Issues and Options Feedback Document which are available to view at www.chelmsford.gov.uk/ldf
How do I get involved?
2.27 The potential options do not represent the Borough Council’s final view on the contents of the SADPD. Before that position is reached, we would like as many people as possible to take advantage of this public consultation and send us their comments on this document. You can comment on any part of the document. Please see Section 1 for further details.
How will my comments be used?
2.28 The main issues raised during the community involvement process on this Potential Options document will be reported and considered in the preparation of the FINAL SADPD (to be called Proposed Submission SADPD). Further consultation on potential sites for new Gyspy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation will also be undertaken to inform the next SADPD.
2.29 The Proposed Submission SADPD will be published for public consultation before it is subject to an Independent Examination (see Picture 3). 14 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Part 3 Site Allocations and Notations
Managing Growth
3.1 The Borough Council seeks to direct growth to the most sustainable locations in the Borough and ensure new and existing neighbourhoods are easy to get to and well integrated. It will do this through the SADPD by making the following allocations/ designations:
Metropolitan Green Belt Settlement Boundaries Sustainable Transport Special Policy Areas
These are dealt with in turn to follow.
Topic 1 - Green Belt Boundary
3.2 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
East of England Plan PPG2
3.3 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP5, DC1
Overview
3.4 The Green Belt, as it affects Chelmsford, is part of London’s Metropolitan Green Belt. This was designated in the 1950’s to prevent the merging of the capital with other settlements and to provide for an area of open countryside that could be used for recreational purposes. In addition and just as significantly the Green Belt, insofar as it relates to Chelmsford, is of local strategic importance especially in the context of preventing the merging of Chelmsford’s urban area with nearby settlements. This is particularly the case in relation to Writtle and Galleywood. Over one third of the Borough falls within the Green Belt.
3.5 The role of SADPD is to designate the Metropolitan Green Belt on the Proposals Map in line with the Adopted Core Strategy and to ensure that boundaries are up-to-date and defendable in the long term. This has also provided an opportunity to identify land that makes a lesser contribution to the Green Belt and could be suitable for limited development for example, to provide local needs affordable housing.
Objectives
3.6 The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy, the purposes of including land in Green Belts and its objectives are outlined in the Government’s Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green Belts. This also confirms that once the general extent of Green Belt has been approved it should be altered only in exceptional circumstances. The protection of the Metropolitan Green Belt around Chelmsford is a central element of the Adopted Core Strategy expressed in Policies CP5 and DC1. The key objectives are: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 15
Site Allocations and Notations 3
To provide certainty as to where Green Belt policies will and will not apply across the Borough No major release of land from the Green Belt in order to maintain its openness and national Government guidance (with the exception of new developments approved in the Adopted Core Strategy including Temple Farm for Employment and Park and Ride sites) Limited releases of land from the Green Belt for new residential development outlined in Topics 9 and 10 Restrict other types of new development to that permitted under Core Policy DC1. This includes Park & Ride, buildings directly related to agriculture or forestry and essential small-scale facilities for outdoor sport or recreation.
Criteria for Defining
3.7 The general extent of the Green Belt is defined on the Key Diagram of the Adopted Core Strategy. The boundaries of the Green Belt have been reviewed as shown on maps in Section 6. These have been drawn to:
Include land that meets Green Belt purposes and objectives as set out in national and local policies Include non-consolidated development within and on the edge of the Green Belt such as residential properties, agricultural buildings and recreational facilities which contribute to the purposes of Green Belt Exclude land that makes a lesser contribution to Green Belt objectives and is suitable for sustainable new development for future local needs – see Topics 9 and 10 Wherever possible, be coterminous with the defined settlements (villages) and Chelmsford Urban Area – see Topic 2 Wherever practicable and appropriate, boundaries follow well-defined physical features such as walls, fences, hedgerows, roads and streams.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Site Allocation 1 – Green Belt (Maps 1-5, 11, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23-25, 27, 29-31, 33)
3.8 The potential boundaries of the Borough’s Green Belt are considered to be effective when taking into account the objectives and criteria described above. The main amendments include:
Exclusions to reflect the designation of new or extended settlement boundaries e.g. at Edney Common, properties along Church Road (West Hanningfield) and properties north of Maldon Road (Margaretting) Amendments so the Green Belt boundary is coterminous with settlement boundaries Releases around Chelmsford and certain villages for new affordable housing i.e. Runwell, Roxwell, Margaretting, West Hanningfield, Great Baddow Minor adjustments to reflect changes on the ground and to follow more logical and defensible boundaries i.e. to follow the line of the new A1060 and to take into account development with planning permission at Writtle College. 16 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Rejected Options
3.9 Revisions or releases of land from the Metropolitan Green Belt other than that proposed in this document would be inconsistent with national and local policy. This includes third party proposals for new developments around Great Baddow, Writtle and Rettendon. Further details are contained within the Issues and Options Feedback Document.
Topic 2 - Settlement Boundaries
3.10 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Village Design Statements Landscape Character Assessment PPG2
3.11 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP5, CP15, CP16, CP22, DC1, DC2, DC11, DC12, DC32, DC35
Overview
3.12 A settlement boundary (or envelope) is a line on a map which defines the boundary between towns and villages and their surrounding countryside. Settlement envelopes are not an attempt to define the extent of a particular town or village community.
3.13 In broad terms the Adopted Core Strategy seeks to concentrate new building into existing towns of Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers and larger villages and to restrict it elsewhere. Development outside an envelope is generally subject to restrictive policies which strictly limit uses appropriate to the countryside, such as agricultural buildings. This prevents development being spread throughout the countryside and helps to safeguard the existing form and character of settlements. It is important to note that the inclusion of land within an envelope does not necessarily mean that development in it will be acceptable. Such proposals will still need to satisfy the relevant policies in the Core Strategy that regulate development such as access and amenity.
3.14 The Borough Council has reviewed settlement boundaries of Chelmsford, South Woodham Ferrers and the villages as listed in Table 2. This has provided an opportunity to:
Reflect new development such as housing, employment and other uses that are clearly settlement related and not open countryside Address anomalies or errors of exclusions in the current settlement boundaries Create more defensible boundaries Identify potential sites for new development to meet community needs including affordable housing.
Objectives
3.15 Envelope lines around towns and villages have been a key element of planning policy in this Borough for many years. The key objectives are:
Define areas which will be the subject of policies dealing with development within defined settlements, and to differentiate these areas from the remainder of the Borough Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 17
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Include land adjoining settlements considered suitable for new housing to meet existing and future needs No major expansion of town and village envelopes to conserve the existing character of settlements and to protect the countryside from encroachment.
3.16 The Core Strategy only provides for a limited amount of new development around settlements in the SADPD. As such, it is expected that settlement boundaries will be defined tightly around the built-up framework and largely be maintained.
Criteria for Defining
3.17 In drawing the envelope lines around settlements the Borough Council has sought to adopt a consistent approach based on the criteria set out below. Clearly some criteria are required in combination with others and/ or require a judgement to be made on a site by site basis in order to determine suitability for inclusion. Boundaries are drawn to:
Define the break between the present predominantly built up area and the adjoining land of a predominantly rural character. The built-up area must be settlement related (e.g. residential development, domestic gardens, school buildings) and not related to agriculture or considered part of the countryside. In most cases this break is visually apparent Where possible follow defined features such as walls, hedgerows or roads. Where properties are on the edge of settlements and have extensive or very long back gardens the boundary is drawn approximately 25 metres from the rear of the building. This seeks to prevent backland development which could harm the character of the open countryside. This approach reflects that used in the preparation of the Chelmsford Borough Local Plan Exclude development physically or visually detached from the settlement by features or constraints on the ground, for example rivers, railway lines or roads Exclude playing fields or open space at the edge of settlements which contribute significantly to the appearance and character of the area, to ensure they remain undeveloped Exclude temporary structures and new allocations for affordable housing exception sites (See Topic 10) Include residential development of similar density and character to the rest of the settlement. Where buildings are set in spacious grounds, such as large houses, hotels, schools and industrial premises and are on the edge of villages, their inclusion within the envelope depends upon the extent to which they appear to relate to the overall physical fabric of the village. Usually, their relative isolation due to their spacious or dispersed setting means they appear more strongly related to the countryside and are excluded. To include such buildings within the envelopes could give rise to pressure to develop the land adjoining them, which would significantly alter the character and appearance of the village Although farms often adjoin villages they are excluded from the envelope because their rural characteristics predominate and they relate more strongly to the countryside than to the village. The same applies to paddocks and glasshouses Include land with planning consent for residential development or community facilities which when completed will be built-up in character and relate to the overall physical fabric of the village Boundaries do not need to be continuous and may comprise two or more separate elements Have regard to Approved Village Design Statements and Parish Plans setting out guidance on the development of villages and local landscape character 18 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
3.18 The table below summarises the criteria used to assess whether land and /or sites are suitable for inclusion within a settlement boundary. This is intended to give some clarity with the proviso that judgements have been made on a site by site basis as described above.
3.19 Table 1 - Summary of Criteria Used to Assess Sites Suitable for Inclusion in Settlement Boundaries
Include Within Settlement Boundary Exclude From Settlement Boundary
Permanent Structures Temporary Structures
Settlement related land use e.g. Residential Land which has the characteristics of open development, community facilities, domestic countryside gardens
Follows the existing line of the settlement Visually or physically detached from the rest of the settlement. Non settlement related uses e.g. farms, paddocks
Residential development of similar density and Buildings in spacious grounds considered more character to the rest of the settlement related to the countryside e.g. large houses, hotels and industrial premises and on the edge of villages
Residential curtilages (except long back gardens) New allocations for affordable housing exception sites
Land with planning permission for settlement Land with temporary planning permission uses e.g. residential, community facilities
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.20 The potential boundaries of the Borough’s defined settlements (as shown on maps in Section 6) are considered to be effective when taking into account the objectives and criteria described above.
3.21 Potential housing proposal sites and sites for affordable housing are mapped in Section 6 and explained in Appendix E. Further information is also set out in Topics 9 and 10 and the Sustainability Appraisal.
Site Allocations 2-28 - Settlement Boundaries (Maps in Section 6)
3.22 Table 2 Settlements with envelopes defined through the SADPD
Site Allocation Settlement Map Reference Number
2 Chelmsford Urban Area 3
3 South Woodham Ferrers Urban Area 4
Key Defined Settlements Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 19
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Allocation Settlement Map Reference Number
4 Bicknacre 6
5 Boreham 7
6 Danbury 9
7 Galleywood 13
8 Great Leighs 15
9 Runwell 27
10 Stock 29
11 Writtle 33
Other Defined Settlements
12 Chatham Green 8
13 East Hanningfield 10
14 Edney Common 11
15 Ford End 12
16 Good Easter 14
17 Howe Green 17
18 Howe Street 18
19 Highwood (Loves Green) 16
20 Little Baddow 19
21 Margaretting 20
22 Ramsden Heath 23
23 Rettendon 24
24 Rettendon Place 25
25 Roxwell 26
26 Sandon 28
27 West Hanningfield 31
28 Woodham Ferrers 32 20 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Rejected Options
3.23 Apply existing settlement boundaries with no amendment as these do not accurately reflect the position on the ground in each settlement.
3.24 Larger expansions to settlements as this would conflict with the Adopted Core Strategy. This includes proposals around Boreham, Galleywood, Little Baddow and Rettendon. Further details are contained within the Issues and Options Feedback Document.
3.25 Settlement envelopes around smaller villages or groups of buildings not identified as Defined Settlements within the Adopted Core Strategy. This includes South Hanningfield.
Topic 3 – Sustainable Transport
3.26 Evidence Base Documents
Essex Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 ECC Park and Ride Assessments
3.27 Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP4, CP19, CP24, CP26, DC6, DC7, DC41, DC61, DC62, DC64
3.28 The suite of Core Strategy and Development Control Policies contain many that relate to sustainable transport. The key role of sustainable transport within the Local Development process is set out in Policy CP4 – Securing Infrastructure, in terms of key infrastructure requirements which include the Chelmsford North East By-pass, a new North East Chelmsford Rail Station plus capacity improvements at the existing station, transport links between new neighbourhoods and the town centre, additional Park and Ride sites, bus priority and bus-based rapid transit (ChART). Other policies address traffic management measures plus cycleways and footpaths. Within the area of the SADPD there are allocations for Park and Ride and cycleways.
Park and Ride
Overview
3.29 Park and Ride is a major component of Essex County Council’s transport policy and Chelmsford Borough Council’s planning policy. Chelmsford’s first Park and Ride site opened at Sandon in March 2006 and has been extremely successful. Planning permission was recently granted for a further expansion of this site, upon completion it will accommodate 1,426 cars.
Objectives
3.30 An area of land on Essex Regiment Way will be allocated through the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan as the town’s second Park and Ride site. Two ‘Areas of Search’ for additional sites have been identified. These are at Widford (allocated through this DPD) and at Boreham Interchange (allocated through the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan). Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 21
Site Allocations and Notations 3
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Site Allocation 29 – Widford Park and Ride Area of Search (Map 3)
3.31 A Park and Ride site at Widford has been identified as an ‘Area of Search’ as the work required to identify an exact location and prepare the necessary business case is ongoing.
Rejected Options
3.32 The work on preparing the evidence base for the development of Park and Ride within Chelmsford included the examination of a wide range of locations throughout the Borough. The responses to the SADPD ‘Issues and Options’ consultation proposed Park and Ride sites at Widford, Roxwell/Roxwell Road, Great Baddow, Great Leighs Racecourse, Writtle College and at Galleywood, in addition to sites within the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan area. The possibility of further Park and Ride sites in Chelmsford will be considered when the Core Strategy is reviewed.
Cycleways and footpaths
Overview
3.33 Walking and cycle routes are major components of the Local Development Framework. They must be well designed so that people will feel safe to use them as an alternative to travelling by car.
Objectives
3.34 Chelmsford is a town which has a strong cycling culture. There is already an extensive network of cycle routes, some off road and some on road. Through the LDF process the three allocation DPD’s (CTCAAP, NCAAP and this document) further cycle routes will be designated.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Site Allocation 30 – Proposed Cycle Routes (Maps 2, 3, 4, 7, 27, 33)
3.35 For a number of years the Borough Council jointly with Essex County Council has developed a cycle network in Chelmsford and maintained a plan of proposed cycleways in order that these can help determine the sustainable transport provisions that are required from all development proposals. This is shown in Section 6 and has been updated as part of preparing this SADPD taking into account the suggestions put forward at the Issues and Options stage in order to further expand Chelmsford’s cycle networks.
Rejected Options
3.36 The responses to the SADPD ‘Issues and Options’ consultation proposed a number of additional cycleways, some were defined in great detail, some were more general e.g. Broomfield to Chelmsford. The development of cycle networks in Chelmsford is a continuous process that is carried out chiefly by Essex County Council which is the highways and transportation authority, although as local planning authority the Borough Council has a role to play. Some of the proposed new cycle routes put forward are not technically feasible but the corridors identified and principles involved will be borne in mind as the ongoing reviews of the cycle network take place 22 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Road proposals
3.37 Within the area covered by the Site Allocations DPD there are road proposals for the replacement Chelmer Viaduct and the Chelmsford North East bypass that are not formal allocations under SADPD. For completeness these are shown on the SADPD Proposals Map.
Topic 4 - Special Policy Areas
3.38 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Writtle College Masterplan
3.39 Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP2, DC1, DC2
Overview
3.40 The five existing Special Policy Areas of Great Leighs Racecourse, Sandford Mill, Hanningfield Treatment Works, Broomfield Hospital and Writtle College lie within the countryside and / or the Green Belt where ordinarily policy would constrain new development. The Special Policy Area designation will enable the operational and functional requirements of these facilities or institutions to be planned in a strategic and phased manner in line with Core Strategy Policy CP2. This SADPD will define the boundaries of four Special Policy Areas and consider the types of development needed on these sites. Broomfield Hospital is addressed in the NCAAP.
Objectives
3.41 In order to provide a framework for clear and consistent decision making the boundaries around Special Policy Areas have been drawn. Key objectives are to:
Secure the long-term future and sustainable development of Special Policy Areas Enable Special Policy Areas to be planned in a strategic and phased manner Ensure future development reflects the operational and functional requirements of the Special Policy Areas Ensure future development minimises the impact of development on their surroundings, sites important for nature conservation and built heritage including Listed Buildings Strengthen access to the sites by sustainable modes of transport and minimise traffic pressures on local roads At Great Leighs Racecourse, promote adequate landscaping around the site and appropriate restoration of the active Minerals site in line with the existing planning permission At Sandford Mill, work with Essex Waterways to promote a mixed-use development to sustain the future use and continuation of the Chelmer and Blackwater Navigation and, create a ‘hub’ of activity along it Approve Masterplans for each Special Policy Area containing more detail on the strategy for their development. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 23
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Allocation 31 - Great Leighs Racecourse (Map 1)
3.42 Great Leighs Racecourse is located at the former Essex County Showground site in the north of the Borough. It has been developed as a major new racecourse and equestrian centre with supporting entertainment facilities. Extensive ground works have been carried out, a new stadium erected and a range of supporting equestrian facilities built. A number of horse races were held in 2008. However, racing was suspended in January 2009 and the site is in administration. It is believed that the joint administrators are seeking to continue to trade the business in the short term, and are currently in discussions with the sport’s regulatory body, the British Horseracing Authority, in respect of securing the course’s racing license and ability to continue to trade as a going concern, while they investigate the opportunity of a sale.As such, the Special Policy Area status remains appropriate. Opportunities for development will need to be balanced with the environmental impacts of this large site, especially regarding transport and how new buildings will affect the countryside.
Site Allocation 32 - Sandford Mill (Map 3)
3.43 Sandford Mill lies in countryside to the east of Chelmsford. It comprises a collection of buildings, mill pond and filter beds that formed part of the original water treatment works that served Chelmsford. The site is currently in use as a museum related to the story of Chelmsford's unique industrial heritage. Vehicular access is achieved from Chelmsford via Brook End Road. It is recognised as an opportunity for an appropriate mixed-use development linked to the Chelmer and Blackwater Navigation. Its location within the floodplain, Conservation Area and Green Wedge will need careful consideration when deciding on the type and extent of any new development.
Site Allocation 33 - Hanningfield Reservoir Treatment Works (Map 31)
3.44 Hanningfield Reservoir Treatment Works is an important site for water treatment and related activities serving the Borough and other parts of Essex. Its Green Belt location requires careful consideration when deciding on the type and extent of any new development.
Site Allocation 34 - Writtle College (Map 33)
3.45 Writtle College is a long established and nationally recognised land-based technologies college, which is seeking to expand and broaden its educational facilities and opportunities. It is a key employer in the Borough. The Eastern Section, off Lordship Road, includes the main Further and Higher Education Campuses north of Writtle Village. The West Section is the location for the Rural Education and Training Centre at the Cow Watering Lane Campus. In March 2009 planning permission was granted for the redevelopment of the central campus to provide new teaching facilities, sports hall, animal care and machinery workshop.
3.46 The College’s Green Belt location between Chelmsford and Writtle is a major issue, requiring careful consideration when deciding on the type and extent of any new development in the future.
Criteria for Defining
3.47 The boundaries of the Special Policy Areas in the SADPD are shown at maps 1, 3, 31 and 33 and have been drawn to:
Include existing consolidated built-up parts of the Special Policy Areas and areas with approved planning permission for future development Have regard to existing and planned operational and functional requirements of the sites 24 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Wherever practicable and appropriate, boundaries follow well-defined physical features such as walls, fences, hedgerows, roads and streams Preserve local landscape and wildlife links between the countryside and the Special Policy Areas.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.48 The potential boundaries of the Special Policy Areas are considered appropriate at achieving the objectives and criteria set out above in line with the Core Strategy.
Rejected Options
3.49 Further extensions are not considered necessary to achieve the planned operational and functional requirements of the Special Policy Areas. It could also encourage the spread of development into the open countryside and harm local landscape character.
3.50 Works proposed by Essex and Suffolk Water Company (including a dam and associated sludge pits/lagoons) are not considered likely to result in an increased harm on the openness of the Green Belt or the fulfilment of its purposes. A less restrictive policy framework afforded through the SPA designation on all the land linked to the reservoir and treatment works is not considered necessary to the efficient operation of the site.
3.51 Proposals to greatly extend Great Leighs Racecourse into surrounding fields are not considered appropriate given its current status.
3.52 Further details on proposals received are contained within the Issues and Options Feedback Document.
Picture 4 West Hanningfield Road, Chelmsford Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 25
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Environmental Protection and Enhancement
3.53 The Borough Council seeks to protect and enhance the Borough’s natural and built environment in line with the environmental strategic objectives of the Adopted Core Strategy. It will do this through the SADPD by making the following allocations/ designations:
Green Wedges Coastal Protection Belt Protected Lanes Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme
These are dealt with in turn to follow.
3.54 It should be borne in mind that the Adopted Core Strategy also includes policies that protect sites of international, national, regional and local nature conservation and biodiversity importance. These include Special Areas of Conservation (SAC’s), Special Protection Areas (SPA’s), Ramsar Sites, Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI’s), Ancient Woodlands, Local Nature Reserves and Local Wildlife Sites. These sites are designated by organisations such as Natural England and Essex County Council and not Chelmsford Borough Council. As such, the SADPD does not propose any changes to, or new designations of, these sites. However, they are identified on the Proposals Map for information.
3.55 A number of ‘Living Landscapes’ are also identified by Essex Wildlife Trust across the Borough. These are key areas of landscape which are promoted for nature conservation, wildlife habitats, public enjoyment and adaptation to climate change. Part of the Borough’s Green Wedge is covered by Living Landscapes. Others include Hanningfield Reservoir and Woods, Galleywood Common and part of Danbury Ridge. The area to the north of Boreham including the former Boreham Airfield which is currently subject to mineral extraction is also identified as a Living Landscape (named Boreham Common) which overlaps into the NCAAP area. The Borough Council seeks to promote the value of these areas. More information is available from Essex Wildlife Trust.
3.56 The SADPD also has regard to the European Sites of nature conservation. There are two sites within the Borough - Crouch and Roach Estuaries, SPA and Ramsar Site and Essex Estuaries SAC). There are a further four sites outside the Borough boundary (Blackwater Estuary, SPA and Ramsar Site, Dengie SPA and Ramsar Site, Colne Estuary SPA and Ramsar Site and Foulness SPA and Ramsar Site). The Borough Council will seek to ensure that development proposed in the SADPD will avoid significant effects on the European Sites.
Topic 5 - Green Wedges
3.57 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Chelmsford Landscape Character Assessment Historic Environment Characterisation Project Mid Essex Landscape Character Assessment Chelmsford Borough Council Biodiversity Action Plan 2008-12
3.58 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP9, DC9 26 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Overview
3.59 Green Wedges are open, relatively undeveloped areas of land that link Chelmsford’s Urban Area and the countryside around the valleys of the Rivers Chelmer, Can and Wid. The Core Strategy recognises the important role that the valleys have had in the shaping the form and character of Chelmsford’s Urban Area.
3.60 The parts of the river valleys which are located within Chelmsford Town Centre have already been defined as Green Wedges within the adopted Chelmsford Town Centre Area Action Plan. For ease of reference the following descriptors are proposed for the Green Wedges outside the Town Centre:
River Chelmer North River Chelmer/ Blackwater Navigation East River Can/ Wid West
The River Chelmer North Green Wedge is largely addressed within the NCAAP.
Objectives
3.61 Green Wedges are the basis of Chelmsford’s green infrastructure network and are, therefore an important resource and amenity for the residents of the urban area of Chelmsford.
3.62 Key objectives are to:
Identify site specific allocations proposed in the SADPD including Sandford Mill Special Policy Area - Topic 4 Maintain a ‘green lung’ into Chelmsford urban areas Maximise public enjoyment of the river valleys and its use for recreation Enhance existing and create new footpath and cycle routes Maintain and protect the open character of the river valley landscapes Conserve and enhance existing recreational sites, natural habitats, wildlife links, views, hedgerow patterns and open spaces in the valleys Protect and nurture bio-diversity and nature conservation sites within the valleys Promote the appropriate management of wildlife habitats, tree and hedge planting along built edges and improvement of paths and access ways Improve access into and within Sandford Mill including use of the navigation, which will in turn increase access to the valley.
Criteria for Defining
3.63 The general extent of the Green Wedge is defined on the Key Diagram of the Adopted Core Strategy. The boundaries of the Green Wedges in the SADPD are shown at maps 1, 3 and 33 and have been drawn to:
Include important areas of open land around the river valleys Include non-consolidated development within and on the edge of the valleys such as residential properties, agricultural buildings and recreational facilities which contribute to local distinctiveness and sense of place Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 27
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Preserve local landscape and wildlife links between the countryside and Chelmsford urban area Be coterminous with the defined urban area of Chelmsford and follow clear natural or physical barriers wherever appropriate such as local landscape and roads.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.64 The potential boundaries of the Green Wedges are considered to be effective when taking into account the objectives and criteria listed above.
Site Allocation 35 - River Chelmer North Green Wedge (Map 3)
3.65 The River Chelmer and its valley run north-south across the SADPD, NCAAP and CTCAAP Plan Areas and is one of the defining landscape features of the area. The distinct character of this landscape is recognised in the Chelmsford Landscape Character Assessment.
3.66 The proposed extent of this Green Wedge area is shown at map 3. This runs from Chelmer Valley Road in the north and to the west of Hill View Road in the south. The Chelmer Valley has important nature conservation areas including Chelmer Valley Riverside Local Nature Reserve and Springfield Hall Park and Playing Fields. It also contains sites for formal and informal recreation that are linked by an existing network of footpaths and cycleways running west-east and north-south.
Site Allocation 36 - River Chelmer/Blackwater Navigation East Green Wedge (Map 3)
3.67 This Green Wedge follows the Chelmer Valley to the east of the town centre, and between Great Baddow and Chelmer Village to the A12. The River Chelmer is an important feature in the area, contributing to the setting of the Navigation.
3.68 The proposed extent of this Green Wedge is shown at map 3. It contains nature conservation sites and areas for recreation which are linked by an existing network of footpaths and cycleways running throughout the valley. A large proportion of the area is within a Conservation Area.
3.69 Sandford Mill is identified as a Special Policy Area within the Green Wedge where less restrictive policies may be applied in relation to its future development – see Topic 4.
Site Allocation 37 - River Can/ Wid West Green Wedge (Map 1, 3 and 33)
3.70 This Green Wedge follows the Can Valley to the west of Chelmsford town centre and between West Chelmsford and Roxwell Road. It is a key landscape feature that provides an important resource and amenity for the residents of the urban area of west Chelmsford and the adjoining village of Writtle.
3.71 The proposed extent of this Green Wedge is shown at maps 1, 3 and 33. It contains a Local Nature Reserve at the western end of Admirals Park which links to the Writtle Bridge Meadows Local Wildlife Site, a 12.8ha grassland site. It also includes areas of open space and opportunities for informal recreation. The area is well connected with an existing network of footpaths and cycleways linking Writtle and the adjoining countryside to the urban area. 28 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Rejected Options
3.72 Major extensions to the Green Wedges for example to Danbury, Boreham and South Woodham Ferrers and large exclusions for new development as these do not accord with Adopted Core Strategy.
3.73 Exclusion of buildings or areas within the valley slopes such as Writtle Mill and Baddow Meads as these are contribute to local distinctiveness and sense of place.
Topic 6 – Coastal Protection Belt
3.74 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Essex and Southend-on-Sea Replacement Structure Plan Shoreline Management Plan Coastal Protection Plan
3.75 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP9, DC10
Overview
3.76 The Coastal Protection Belt aims to protect the rural and undeveloped coastline from inappropriate development that would adversely affect its open character and irreplaceable assets, sites of nature conservation importance, wildlife habitats and, historic and cultural features. Although the Coastal Protection Belt only covers a small part of the Borough near South Woodham Ferrers, it creates an attractive and un-spoilt setting for the town. It also includes a variety of international and European designations including Ramsar site(s), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Sites of Special Scientific Interest and locally important sites designated around the estuaries.
Objectives
3.77 The Borough Council is committed to protecting the special character of the open, rural and undeveloped coastline in the south of the Borough in line with Core Strategy Policies CP9 and DC10. Key objectives are to:
Ensure no loss of the Coastal Protection Belt except to allow for developments requiring a coastal location that cannot be located elsewhere such as flood defenses Conserve and improve the walking links between South Woodham Ferrers urban area and the Coastal Protection Belt including the sea wall Conserve and enhance important nature conservation and wildlife habitats within the Belt Conserve historic features and cultural heritage within the Belt.
Criteria for Defining
3.78 The general extent of the Coastal Protection Belt is defined on the Key Diagram of the Adopted Core Strategy. This follows the Essex Coast Protection Subject Plan. The boundaries of the Coastal Protection Belt in the SADPD are shown at maps 2, 4 and 5 and have been drawn to:
Include the coastal area, estuaries and areas around South Woodham Ferrers which contribute to coastal character Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 29
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Wherever possible and appropriate be coterminous with the defined urban area of South Woodham Ferrers and follow clear natural or physical barriers such as roads and railway lines Include non-consolidated development on the edge of the Belt such as residential properties, agricultural buildings and recreational facilities Protect important natural and cultural assets, local landscape and wildlife links between the Belt and South Woodham Ferrers urban area Have regard to the approved 'A Plan for South Woodham Ferrers SPD'.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Site Allocation 38 – Coastal Protection Belt (Map 2, 4, 5)
3.79 The boundary of the Borough’s Coastal Protection Belt is shown on maps 2, 4 and 5. It is considered to be effective at meeting the objectives for the Belt and the criteria to define it.
Rejected Options
3.80 A boundary that does not reflect the Core Strategy Key Diagram and the coastal area on the ground.
Topic 7 – Protected Lanes
3.81 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Historic Environment Character Report Essex County Council Protected Lanes Protected Lanes Study for Chelmsford Borough Council, ECC 2009
3.82 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP9, DC15
Overview
3.83 Protected Lanes are country lanes with considerable historic and landscape value that contribute to rural character. These originate from pre-historic trackways through the forest, and later lanes used during Saxon and Medieval periods. Protected Lanes were originally designated by Essex County Council in the mid 1970’s and designated through the Essex Structure Plan. The Borough Council commissioned a review of Protected Lanes as part of preparing the NCAAP and SADPD. Policy DC15 of the Adopted Core Strategy identifies and protects these from development that may affect them.
Objectives
3.84 The Borough Council is committed to protecting lanes which contribute to the character of the countryside and have historic value. Key objectives are to:
Protect the character of the Borough’s historic lanes Resist developments which would damage or be detrimental to Protected Lanes Promote the positive management of land around Protected Lanes including agricultural practices 30 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Consider the use of protective measures such as Tree Preservation Orders around Protected Lanes Work with ECC to promote traffic management measures to control or restrict traffic movements where this is felt to be in the long term interest of the Protected Lane.
Assessment Criteria
3.85 A review of lanes has been carried out by Essex County Council Historic Environment Management Team. This scores a lane against a set of criteria developed in line with modern assessments of historic and natural environment assets. Protected Lanes which score well against the following criteria are shown at maps in Section 6. The methodology used and the full criterion applied is contained in the 2009 Survey document are summarised below:
The lane must be classified as a Class III highway, an Un-classified highway or Byway Open to all traffic The lane must be depicted on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map c.1876 The lane has a range of forms and a variety of historic features along its length. A lane with changes in its form e.g. from sunken lane to flat, with frequent changes in direction and which has a wide variety of historic features such as boundary banks and ditches and ancient hedgerows score highly as would a lane which takes a single form but has many historic features The lane provides insights into past communities and their activities. For example a historic lane which provided or still provides direct or indirect access to an area of ancient woodland, medieval farmstead containing medieval listed buildings, a scheduled medieval moated site, roadside green with pond and that marks a parish boundary would score highly The lane contributes to our understanding of its origin, construction, modifications and use. A lane with a wide variety of earthworks e.g. bank, ditch, verge and buried land surface will score highly The lane has a non-contemporary spatial association with known archaeological sites. A historic lane which runs along the course of a Roman road or which cuts across an earlier archaeological site would score high The lane is relatively well preserved and complete. A lane which does not appear to have been altered e.g. a green lane which has a grass surface and adjacent hedgerows will score highly; one where the form has been altered, physical features removed and the verges are suffering erosion due to heavy traffic flow will score low The lane and its associated features have biodiversity value. A lane which is designated for its biodiversity value e.g. a green lane which is designated as Local Wildlife Site, a lane with contains a special verge and a lane with ancient species rich hedgerow will score high.
3.86 For Protected Lanes falling outside the area covered by the SADPD please see the NCAAP.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.87 A set of robust and defensible criteria has been applied to allow a systematic and integrated assessment and comparison of historic lanes in Chelmsford Borough. This is based on:
Diversity Historic Integrity Archeological Potential Aesthetic value Biodiversity Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 31
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Group Value Archaeological Potential
3.88 The following table lists lanes that retain their Protected Lane status and lanes that gain Protected Lanes status following a call for Protected Lanes in the Issues and Options Consultation Document. Please note that where a Protected Lane is shown with the reference 1 or 2, e.g. Goodmans Lane 2, this indicates that the lane was surveyed in two parts.
Site Allocations 39-92 - Protected Lanes (Maps 1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 19, 29, 30, 31, 33)
3.89 Table 3 Proposed Protected Lanes
Site Allocation Parish Name of Lane Number
39 Danbury Riffhams Lane
40 East Hanningfield Back Lane
41 Good Easter Clatterford End
42 Good Easter Shorts Farm Lane
43 Good Easter Mill Road
44 Good Easter Tituswell Lane
45 Great and Little Leighs Goodmans Lane 2
46 Great and Little Leighs Paulk Hall Lane
47 Great and Little Leighs Whites Lane
48 Great and Little Leighs Rectory Lane
49 Great Waltham Littley Green Road
50 Great Waltham Littley Park Lane
51 Highwood Nathans Lane 1
52 Highwood Ingatestone Road
53 Little Baddow Graces Lane
54 Little Baddow Chapel Lane
55 Little Baddow Hurrells Lane
56 Little Baddow Holybread Lane
57 Little Baddow New Lodge Chase
58 Little Baddow Tofts Chase 32 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Allocation Parish Name of Lane Number
59 Little Waltham Scurvy Hall Lane
60 Little Waltham Hyde Road
61 Margaretting Ivy Barn Lane
62 Margaretting Swan Lane
63 Margaretting Handley Green Lane
64 Mashbury Bedfords Hill
65 Pleshey Ford End Road
66 Pleshey Blakes Lane
67 Pleshey Vicarage Road
68 Pleshey Grange Road
69 Pleshey Park Road
70 Pleshey Bury Road
71 Roxwell Radley Green Road
72 Roxwell Farmbridge End Road
73 Sandon Woodhill Common Road
74 Sandon Sporehams Lane
75 Stock Broomwood Lane
76 Stock Goatsmoor Lane
77 Woodham Ferrers Edwins Hall Road
78 Writtle Newney Green
79 Boreham Church Road
80 Boreham Road / Cole Hill / Boreham Great and Little Leighs Road
81 Danbury Mill Lane 2
82 Danbury Gay Bowers Road 1
83 Danbury Capons Lane 1
84 Danbury Gay Bowers Lane
85 Great Waltham Black Chapel Lane Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 33
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Allocation Parish Name of Lane Number
86 Little Baddow Spring Elms Lane
87 Stock Mill Lane
88 West Hanningfield Lower Stock Road 2
89 West Hanningfield Hall Lane
90 West Hanningfield West Hanningfield Road 1
91 West Hanningfield Lower Stock Road 1
92 Woodham Ferrers and Bicknacre Workhouse Lane
Rejected Options
3.90 Lanes which do not meet the Highway / Byway Classification and Age criteria are automatically discounted. These include grass roads or green lanes (usually designated as bridleways or footpaths).
3.91 Lanes which do not score above the threshold for inclusion have also been discounted.
3.92 Grading Lanes - this is unnecessary as Policy DC15 seeks to protect all Protected Lanes regardless of their relative importance or significance compared with each other.
3.93 Discounted lanes are listed in the Protected Lanes Study 2009. Existing Protected Lanes that lose their status are listed below.
3.94 Table 4 Discounted Lanes
Parish Lane
Good Easter Newarks Road
Great and Little Leighs Fuller Street
Great and Little Leighs Goodmans Lane 1
Great and Little Leighs Mill Lane
Great and Little Leighs Ranks Green Road
Great and Little Leighs Blackley Lane
Great and Little Leighs Church Lane
Great and Little Leighs Leez Road
Highwood Nathans Lane 2
Little Baddow Church Road
Little Baddow Colam Lane 34 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Little Baddow Riffhams Chase
Mashbury Fox Road
Mashbury Mashbury Green
Roxwell Cooksmill Green
Stock Furze Lane
Stock Whites Hill
Topic 8 – Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme
3.95 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment October 2006 Appendix B Chelmsford Supplementary Report April 2008 Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme Viability Study Final Report May 2008
3.96 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP4, CP10
Overview
3.97 Chelmsford Town Centre contains floodplain for the Rivers Chelmer and Can but existing flood protection offers limited safeguards to existing properties and future development sites during extreme an event, according to flood modeling taking account of climate change. Site by site flood prevention measures will offer only piecemeal protection and cannot deliver the comprehensive protection that the town centre requires. To address this, a strategic flood alleviation scheme is proposed, the main component of which is an out of town, upstream flood barrier and storage area to the south west of Chelmsford.
Objectives
3.98 A flood alleviation scheme for the town centre of Chelmsford is a key piece of strategic infrastructure. It will provide an improved standard of protection to some 900 residential and commercial properties from a major flood event, and will enable the development of town centre brownfield sites thereby securing the Council’s agenda for growth and regeneration.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Site Allocation 93 – Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme (Map 3, 20)
3.99 The flood alleviation scheme would comprise a barrier and flood storage area on the River Wid near Margaretting together with a series of works through the Town Centre. Subject to receiving relevant approvals and securing funding, construction of the project would commence in 2011. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 35
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Rejected Options
3.100 To achieve the necessary level of protection for the town centre barrier options were considered on the River Can, River Chelmer and River Wid together with works through the Town Centre. These are set out in the Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme Viability Study. Schemes comprising solely a barrier and associated flood storage areas on both/either the Rivers Can and Chelmer would not deliver the level of protection needed for the Town Centre. A scenario of works through the town but without upstream barriers would safeguard some properties, but would not assist important development and would restrict access and views of the rivers that pass through Chelmsford.
Picture 5 Public Art, South Woodham Ferrers 36 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Balanced Communities
3.101 The Borough Council seeks to ensure there is there is an adequate supply of good quality housing in the Borough which offers choice of types and tenures. The number of new homes for Chelmsford Borough is allocated in the East of England Plan. This requires a minimum of 16,000 new houses to be provided across the whole borough between 2001 and 2021. Much of this new housing land supply is already built, has planning permission or is allocated through the CTCAAP or NCAAP.
3.102 However, SADPD also has a role in identifying and allocating sites which will help meet the overall housing target and accord with the Core Strategy. It will do this by making the following allocations/ designations:
Housing Proposal Sites Proposed Affordable Housing Sites Specialist Residential Accommodation Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation
These are dealt with in turn below.
Topic 9 - Housing Proposal Sites
3.103 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Chelmsford Revised Urban Capacity Study – Halcrow PPG17 Assessment of Open Space, Sports and Recreation Provision
3.104 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP5, CP15, CP16, CP22, DC1, DC2, DC11, DC12, DC32, DC35
Overview
3.105 As part of the process of preparing the Core Strategy Document, the Borough Council published an Urban Capacity Study (UCS). This identified existing sites within certain built-up areas of the Borough with development potential for housing that could contribute towards the Borough’s housing target. These include infill sites and previously developed land within Chelmsford, South Woodham Ferrers and larger villages which do not have an existing or past planning permission for development. The sites with an estimated capacity of 12 units are allocated in this Topic. The Chelmsford Revised Urban Capacity Study contains a full list of all sites and is available via our website.
3.106 Furthermore, there are a number of other ‘brownfield’ sites with potential for new residential development. These include land adjacent to The Cock Inn, Boreham and The Nest, Edney Common. There are also a number of sites where change is expected and opportunities exist for future residential and / or mixed use developments over the SADPD plan period. These may include Government Offices, Beeches Road and Chelmsford College Campuses along Moulsham Street and Princes Road if identified as surplus in the future. However, it is important that any proposed development takes account of identified local open spaces deficiencies. As such, these sites will be carefully planned. This may include the preparation of ‘Development Briefs’.
Objectives
3.107 Key objectives when identifying new housing proposal sites are: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 37
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Make the best use of land within existing built-up areas and ‘brownfield’ sites for new development in line with the Adopted Core Strategy Designate sites which are considered deliverable and achievable by 2021 on the Proposals Map Protect where possible and appropriate existing site features such as trees, hedgerows and landscaping Where appropriate identify the proposed development including leading land use and estimated site capacity.
Criteria for Defining
3.108 The following criterion has been applied:
Define sites boundaries that are logical and defensible and have regard to physical features such as hedgerows and roads Have regard to Approved Village Design Statements, Parish Plans and Supplementary Planning Documents setting out guidance on the development of villages and local landscape character Consider the boundaries in the Chelmsford Revised UCS as the starting point for designating boundaries of Urban Capacity Sites
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.109 In line with Government guidance, all the sites identified are considered suitable for residential development by 2021. Further information on allocations proposed in the Defined Settlements including details on rejected sites is given in Appendix E and the Sustainability Appraisal.
Site Allocations 94-117 - Housing Proposal Sites (Maps 3, 4, 11, 13, 21, 23, 33)
3.110 Table 5 Housing Proposal Sites
3.111 The ‘Estimated Capacity’ provides an indication of the potential amount of new development of a site. This will ultimately be determined once a planning application is submitted. The ‘Estimated Capacity’ for Urban Capacity Sites is taken from the ‘best fit’ estimate in the Revised Urban Capacity Study.
Site Site Type Site Address Estimated Proposed Map Allocation Capacity Development Ref. Number
Chelmsford Urban Area
94 Brownfield Chelmsford Unknown at Unknown at this 3 College, Moulsham this stage stage. However, Street Campus development should include provision for public open spaces to meet identified local deficiencies. 38 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Site Type Site Address Estimated Proposed Map Allocation Capacity Development Ref. Number
95 Brownfield Chelmsford Unknown at Unknown at this stage 3 College, Princes this stage although likely to be a Road Campus mixed use development with residential and include provision for public open spaces to meet identified local deficiencies.
96 Brownfield Government Unknown at Unknown at this stage 3 Offices, Beeches this stage Road
97 UCS Land rear of 1 to 7 14 dwellings Residential with 3 Springfield Park vehicular access from Lane Springfield Park Lane.
98 UCS Land south of 18 dwellings Residential 3 Clements Close, development with part of 61 associated open space. Pemberton Lodge Vehicular access from Brook End Road South.
99 UCS Land rear of 15 18 dwellings Residential 3 Clarence Close development with associated open space and landscaping. Vehicular access from Sheppard Drive.
100 UCS Land rear of 23 to 19 dwellings Residential 3 83 Sandford Road development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Sandford Road and/or Gainsborough Crescent. Redevelopment should include provision for new car parking and garages for existing residents. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 39
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Site Type Site Address Estimated Proposed Map Allocation Capacity Development Ref. Number
101 UCS Land rear of 71 – 19 dwellings Residential 3 81 Byron Road development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Byron Road. Redevelopment should include provision for new garages for existing residents.
102 UCS Goldlay Gardens 19 dwellings This site has potential 3 (Essex Library for new residential Headquarters) development with associated open space. Vehicular access to the site would be from Goldlay Gardens.
103 UCS Braemar Avenue, 20 dwellings Residential 3 Moulsham Street development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Braemar Avenue. There is also scope to redevelop the site in conjunction with Chelmsford College to the south.
104 UCS Land rear of 22 22 dwellings Residential 3 Timsons Lane development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Timsons Lane or Coppins Close. Redevelopment should include provision for new garages for existing residents.
105 UCS Land rear of 12 23 dwellings Residential 3 and 16 West development with Avenue associated open space. Vehicular access from 40 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Site Type Site Address Estimated Proposed Map Allocation Capacity Development Ref. Number
Kings Road. Potential opportunity to redevelop the site in conjunction the shopping parade and surrounding area.
106 UCS Land rear of 17 – 25 dwellings Residential 3 37 Beach’s Drive development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Beach’s Drive and / or Windley Tye. Part of the site has already been completed.
107 UCS Baddow Road/ Partly Residential 3 Chelwater completed development with Remaining associated open space. capacity of Vehicular access from approx. 20 Chelwater via Baddow dwellings Road.
108 UCS ASDA Car Park, 35 dwellings Residential 3 Chelmer Village development with associated open space. Vehicular access to the site would be from Chelmer Village Way.
109 UCS Parks Depot, 44 dwellings Residential 3 Waterhouse Lane development with associated open space. Vehicular access from Waterhouse Lane.
110 UCS Part of the car 20 dwellings Residential 4 park of South development with Woodham Ferrers associated open space. station Vehicular access to the site would be from Elmar Road.
111 UCS Car park, Coval 24 dwellings Residential 3 Lane development with associated open space. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 41
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Site Type Site Address Estimated Proposed Map Allocation Capacity Development Ref. Number
Vehicular access to the site would be from Rainsford Lane.
Defined Settlements
112 Brownfield Boreham - Land 25 dwellings Residential with 7 between Shearers vehicular access from Way and The Cock Main Road. Inn, Main Road
113 Brownfield Edney Common - 30 dwellings Residential with 11 Land at ‘The Nest’, vehicular access from Highwood Road Highwood Road.
114 UCS Galleywood - Land 22 dwellings Residential with 13 at rear of 24 to 70 associated open space. Pyms Road, Vehicular access from Beehive Lane Beehive Lane. Development should protect Galleywood Local Nature Reserve on the western boundary.
115 Brownfield Ramsden Heath - Unknown at Unknown at this 23 Windsor Road this stage stage. Residential to Trading Estate be a principle land use.
116 Brownfield Rettendon - Unknown at Unknown at this 21 Moreland Industrial this stage. stage. Residential to Estate,Tileworks Also be a principal land use. Lane proposed for new Specialist Residential – see Topic 11
117 UCS Writtle - Land 25 dwellings Residential with 33 surrounding British associated open space. Telecom, Ongar Vehicular access from Road Ongar Road. 42 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Rejected Options
3.112 Allocation of land opposite 43 – 53 Beehive Lane (approximately 43 dwellings) and land off 21 to 25 Beehive Lane (approximately 44 dwellings) as UCS’s - these are established employment areas which add to the Borough’s portfolio of employment sites and units. It is important to retain these employment functions so redevelopment for housing is discounted – see Topic 13.
3.113 Allocation of Chelmerton Avenue as a UCS – there is no obvious site access following the approval of (08/00201/FUL) and it is in multiple land ownerships. It is not considered to be suitable for development in the future and development behind the frontage properties would also harm local character.
3.114 Allocate sites which do not conform to the spatial distribution for new homes identified in the Core Strategy – these include major new ‘greenfield’ development.
Topic 10 – Proposed Affordable Housing Sites
3.115 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Village Design Statements Local Needs Housing Assessments Landscape Character Assessment Housing Needs Survey Strategic Housing Market Assessment
3.116 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP5, CP15, CP16, CP22, DC1, DC2, DC11, DC12, DC32, DC35 Making Places SPD and Affordable Housing SPD
Overview
3.117 New significant housing development on the edge of Chelmsford and villages in the SADPD plan area is constrained due to the Core Strategy’s focus on development in existing built-up areas (Topic 9) and North Chelmsford (see the NCAAP). However, it does support limited new development such as new housing to meet local needs and to support village vitality.
3.118 As such, SADPD will identify and allocate sites for new affordable housing around Chelmsford and certain villages. Affordable housing is that classed as subsidised housing that is made available to people on incomes who cannot afford standard market housing. The current cost of housing means that it is increasingly important for affordable housing to be provided. The Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) identifies an estimated shortfall in provision of around 866 affordable homes each year with about 10% of this coming from rural areas.
3.119 Government policy encourages local planning authorities to take a positive and pro-active approach to delivery of affordable housing. As such, this SADPD will allocate sites solely for affordable housing to address identified needs. Only limited new affordable housing is proposed in accordance with the Core Strategy and for settlements which are considered to have a good range of local community services such as shops, a school and regular public transport. These settlements include Chelmsford, Bicknacre, Danbury and Boreham. Sites suggested by landowners and developers from the Issues and Options consultation have been looked at as part of this process. The full range of factors which have been considered when identifying and proposing sites is outlined below. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 43
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Objectives
3.120 Identify appropriate sites for limited affordable housing development in accordance with Government guidance and the Adopted Core Strategy. The key objectives are:
Identify sites considered acceptable in principle for new affordable housing development in terms of site context and location, accessibility, impact on the highway, topography, local landscape character, scale, village form and existing land use Identify sites for settlements which offer a range of facilities such as a village shop a school, and public transport services Exclude sites considered to be in very sensitive or constrained locations for example, sites in high flood risk areas, sites important for ecology and nature conservation and, in areas which should be protected such as established employment areas and open spaces Exclude sites which if developed could reduce or weaken the gap between settlements Have regard to Borough-wide and Local Housing Needs surveys which provide information on current and future housing needs at Parish level Where appropriate, apply a minimum density of 30 dwellings per hectare in line with PPS3. However, in some instances the character of the surrounding area and existing site features may mean this is not appropriate and that a lower density is required.
3.121 In identifying new affordable housing sites around settlements the Borough Council has sought to adopt a consistent approach based on the criteria set out below:
Define sites which would not adversely harm the existing appearance and character of the area, settlement form and protected sites that should remain undeveloped Define sites that are capable of creating successful and sustainable new affordable housing provision and could satisfy policies regulating development proposals such as design, open space and access. Sites 0.4ha or over typically offer several options for arranging blocks and spaces and greater potential to create new developments of distinct character Protect where possible and appropriate existing site features such as trees, hedgerows and landscaping. Wherever practicable and appropriate, define sites that follow well-defined physical features such as field boundaries, hedgerows, roads and streams Have regard to Approved Village Design Statements and Parish Plans setting out guidance on the development of villages and local landscape character.
3.122 Not all villages which might appear to merit site allocations are considered to have suitable available sites for development. As such, the potential allocations listed below result from a combination of all criteria. The final allocations will be informed by the results of this public consultation. Villages not receiving a site allocation will not necessarily be precluded from receiving some housing development in the future through the affordable housing exception route.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.123 The sites identified are considered appropriate proposals for new affordable housing development. Please refer to maps in Section 6. Not all sites submitted to the Borough Council for consideration by third parties are shown, especially where they do not satisfy the criteria and objectives listed above. Information on allocations relevant to each settlement including details on the potential affordable housing sites and rejected sites is given in Appendix E and the Sustainability Appraisal. 44 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Allocations 118-127 - Proposed Affordable Housing Sites (Maps 3, 6, 9, 10, 15, 20, 26, 27, 31)
3.124 Table 6 Proposed Affordable Housing Sites
Site Settlement Site Address Site Area and Map Allocation Estimated Reference Number Capacity
Sites to meet the affordable housing need of people across Chelmsford Borough
118 Chelmsford Vicarage Lane, Great 0.77ha/ 23 dwellings 3 Baddow
119 Chelmsford Land off Church Street/ 0.48ha/ 14 dwellings 3 Smithers Drive
120 Danbury Land east of Little Fields 0.5ha/ 15 dwellings 9
121 Runwell Land adjacent Runwell 0.5ha/ 15 dwellings 27 House
Sites to meet the affordable housing need of people from that Parish/ village
122 Bicknacre Land south of the 0.55ha/ 17 dwellings 6 Brewers Arms Public House, Main Road
123 East Hanningfield Land at Back Lane 0.7ha/ 15 dwellings 10
124 Great Leighs Land at Rochester House, 0.5ha/ 15 dwellings 15 Main Road
125 Margaretting Land rear of Bank End 0.14ha/ 4 dwellings 20
126 Roxwell Land off Church Green 0.7ha/ 21 dwellings 26
127 West Hanningfield Land at Middlemead 0.5ha/ 12 dwellings 31
Rejected Options
3.125 No allocations for additional new affordable housing as this would not provide for the identified current and future housing needs of the Borough’s communities.
3.126 Allocate sites around settlements which are considered to lack a range of services and facilities and are not well served by public transport including Chatham Green, Good Easter, Howe Street, Howe Green, Rettendon and Rettendon Place as this would be unsustainable and conflict with national, regional and local planning policies
3.127 Allocate sites around settlements which are considered too sensitive or constrained by local topography, landscape character and areas of protection. These include sites around South Woodham Ferrers and Writtle. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 45
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Topic 11 – Specialist Residential Accommodation
3.128 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Housing Strategy 2001-2007 Housing Needs Survey Update 2004 Housing for the elderly: a demographic study of Chelmsford, 2004 Chelmsford Strategic Housing Market Assessment, 2008
3.129 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP5, CP15, CP16, CP22, DC1, DC2, DC11, DC12, DC32, DC35
Overview
3.130 Policy CP15 of the Core Strategy requires a mix of dwelling types, sizes and accommodation to accommodate a balance of different household types and lifestyle choices. There are certain types of residential accommodation which cater for sectors of the community with specific needs. These are often related to the more vulnerable members of society, or those who would benefit from a higher level of on-site support. Potentially, two such groups are the growing elderly population and those who may need specialist social support.
3.131 The Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) prepared on behalf of the Borough Council, and published in 2008, estimates that older persons households will make up 30% of the borough’s population by 2021. The ‘Housing for the elderly: a demographic study of Chelmsford’ undertaken in September 2004 estimates around twenty existing establishments providing supported housing (sheltered housing, residential care homes and nursing homes) for the elderly in Chelmsford. It also estimates a potential shortfall of at least 250 bed-spaces in Chelmsford for this type of accommodation.
3.132 It is understood that land values within allocated areas can make securing sites for such developments difficult in terms of viability and availability. Specific sites are therefore identified in the Site Allocations Development Plan Document to assist in bringing such sites forward and to help meet the housing needs of all members of the community. Other sites will be proposed through the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan.
Objectives
3.133 Specific sites for new specialist residential accommodation are identified in SADPD in order to meet an identified need in the Borough. Policy DC35 of the Core Strategy sets out the criteria by which new specialist residential accommodation sites are assessed. Key objectives are:
Locate specialist residential accommodation in accessible areas, close to main facilities and public transport routes to best cater for residents, staff and visitors and promote social inclusion Ensure developments are well designed and provide acceptable living conditions for occupants Ensure developments do not harm the character of area, local amenity or result in unacceptable visual impact Extra care housing must provide 24 hour access to care on-site and support and a well designed, fit for purpose building in line with best practice and published guidance Promote single storey accommodation in line with the SHMA. 46 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Criteria for Defining
3.134 In identifying new specialist residential accommodation the following criteria has been applied:
Define sites that are capable of creating successful and sustainable new developments and could satisfy policies regulating development proposals such as design and access Wherever practicable and appropriate, define sites identified in approved Village Design Statements and that follow well-defined physical features such as field boundaries, hedgerows, roads and streams Have regard to Approved Village Design Statements setting out guidance on the development of villages and local landscape character.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.135 The following sites are considered appropriate for new specialist residential development when taking into account the objectives and criteria above. Please refer to maps in Section 6.
Site Allocation 128 - Waltham Road, Boreham (Map 7)
3.136 Identify land at Waltham Road, Boreham for a specialist residential care village. This site is close to the Defined Settlement of Boreham (Site Allocation 5). It lies within reach of a wide range of village facilities including shops and regular bus services along Main Road. It also has good access to the main highway including the A12.
Site Allocation 129 - Saint Giles, Moor Hall Lane, Bicknacre (Map 6)
3.137 Identify land for specialist residential housing at Saint Giles, Moor Hall Lane, Bicknacre. Saint Giles estate is close to the village boundary of Bicknacre (Site Allocation 4). It is within walking distance of shops and facilities in Bicknacre village. The site includes an established residential home, which provides accommodation for adults suffering with learning difficulties and mental health problems and is a valuable facility within the Borough. Further development of specialist residential housing would compliment the existing provision available from this location.
Site Allocation 130 – Morelands Industrial Estate, Tileworks Lane, East Hanningfield (Map 21)
3.138 Identify land for specialist residential housing at Morelands, Tileworks Lane. This is a ‘brownfield’ site situated in the south of the Borough close to the A130. The site currently comprises a range of activities related to the storage and dismantling of vehicles, small workshop garages, abandoned vehicles and tyres. Substantial parts of the site are currently degraded by unauthorised uses and activities which now leave the site requiring significant environmental improvement. These are considered special circumstances which justify the removal of this land from the Green Belt. Development on this site will also provide landscape enhancements, environmental improvements and the provision of additional specialist housing to meet identified local needs.
Rejected Options
3.139 Major revisions or releases of land from the Metropolitan Green Belt or Green Wedge as this would not accord with the Adopted Core Strategy. This includes proposals in East Hanningfield, Downham and at Mill Vue Road, Chelmsford – see Green Belt Boundary (Topic 1) and Green Wedges Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 47
Site Allocations and Notations 3
(Topic 5). Proposals that are not close to the main urban areas or a Defined Settlement such as at Howe Green are also discounted as they are not considered in accessible areas or close to main facilities and public transport routes.
Topic 12 – Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation
3.140 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Housing Strategy 2001-2007 Housing Needs Survey Update 2004 Gypsy and Travellers Needs Assessment, 2006 Chelmsford Strategic Housing Market Assessment, 2008 Strategic Housing Market Assessment Emerging Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment 2009 Government Circular 01/2006 and 04/2007 Designing Gypsy and Traveller Sites (CLG) Accommodation for Gypsies and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople in the East of England (Single Issues Review) July 2009 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment, CBC 2009
3.141 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP5,CP15, CP16, CP22, DC1, DC2, DC11, DC12, DC32, DC35
Overview
3.142 The Secretary of State’s Single Issue Review into Gypsy & Traveller Accomodation in the East of England was approved on 20th July. This sets out the amount and distribution of Gypsy and Traveller accommodation in the region. Policy H4 of the Single Issue Review states that there should be a total of 81 pitches in the Borough of Chelmsford by 2011. Beyond 2011 an annual 3% increase in the level of overall provision calculated from overall planned provision in 2011 is set out in the policy. As at July 2009, 81 pitches have already been permitted in the Borough leaving a shortfall of 28 pitches to be provided by 2021. The Council’s strategy is to provide two sites of up to 10 pitches, one of which will be allocated in the NCAAP area. The Site Allocations DPD will make provision for the balance of the Gypsy and Traveller accommodation, although some of this need may be met by families choosing to settle in traditional housing.
3.143 The Single Issue Review also indicates a need for 103 additional plots for Travelling Showpeople in Essex by 2011 with a specific need identified in Thurrock, Chelmsford and Basildon.
3.144 To support the Single Issue Review, a new independent Essex-wide Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) was commissioned by Essex County Council (on behalf of all Essex authorities) in 2008. This seeks to identify the amount of additional accommodation required in each local authority area and provide guidance on the considerations to be taken into account in identifying suitable sites. The GTAA is due to be published later in 2009. However, a Borough-wide call for both Gypsy and Traveller sites and Travelling Showpeople sites is included in this document.
3.145 The suggestions received following the call for sites will be used to help identify potential sites. These will be set out in a further consultation document which will be published in early 2010. The results of this further consultation will inform FINAL sites to be included in the next version of the Site Allocations Document (Proposed Submission) - see Picture 3. 48 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
3.146 Suggestions for sites received outside the SADPD plan area will be considered as part of a Review of the NCAAP and Chelmsford Town Centre Area Action Plan in due course. Existing sites for Gypsy and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople are shown on maps 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 27 and 33.
Objectives
3.147 Key objectives are:
Allocate sites to meet demand for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople pitches in Chelmsford Borough Have regard to the findings of the emerging Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment and identify additional Travelling Showpeople accommodation
Criteria for Selecting Sites
3.148 The criteria against which sites are selected are informed by advice contained in Government publications, including Circular 01/2006 and Adopted Core Strategy Policy DC34. The following considerations will be taken into account when selecting locations for new Gypsy and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople sites:-
The site should be capable of providing safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian access and provide adequate levels of privacy and residential amenity for occupiers The site must be large enough to provide for adequate on site facilities for parking, storage, play and residential amenity The site must have suitable ground conditions and levels of land and not be located in areas of high flood risk The site should be well located on the highway network and accessible to schools and local facilities including healthcare and public transport The location of the site would not be detrimental to the character of area, the amenities of adjacent occupiers or result in unacceptable visual impact The site location and layout should protect existing site features such as trees, hedgerows and landscaping wherever possible The landowner agrees to sell the site or the Borough Council is willing use its powers of Compulsory Purchase (CPO) Have regard to the findings of the emerging Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment 2009
3.149 Due to the constraints of an urban environment and Metropolitan Green Belt, it is unlikely that any site will meet all of the recommended criteria, but this should not in itself exclude sites from consideration. Some difficult decisions will have to be made in balancing all relevant factors to arrive at preferred locations. The Borough Council will seek the agreement of site owners for the Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople sites in the final SADPD. Where landowners are not in agreement, the option of Compulsory Purchase (CPO) is available as a last resort.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
Call for Gypsy and Traveller Sites
3.150 The Borough Council has been looking for suitable Gypsy and Traveller sites for a number of years. A call for suitable sites was included in the Issues and Options Consultation Documents for both the Site Allocation Document and NCAAP in Summer 2007. A Gypsy and Traveller Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 49
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Accommodation Assessment was also undertaken by the Borough Council in August 2009. Through these processes, a number of locations have been assessed and considered unsatisfactory. No sites have been identified as Potential Options at this stage.
3.151 Do you have any suggestions for sites?
3.152 When you are making your comments you may want to take into account national and local policies, Government guidance and the Criteria for Selecting Sites given above. These include good access, near to services, levels of land, avoiding areas of high flood risk and availability of public transport. The Department for Communities and Local Government Circular 01/2006 ‘Planning for Gypsy and Traveller Caravan Sites’ and Good Practice Guide ‘Designing Gypsy and Traveller Sites’ provides advice on site location and selection. For more information go to www.communities.gov.uk
Call for Travelling Showpeople Sites
3.153 The Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment 2009 will inform the amount of additional accommodation required in Chelmsford Borough.
3.154 Do you have suggestions for sites?
3.155 It may be helpful to keep the criteria for sites in mind when submitting your comments on sites for Travelling Showpeople (see Criteria for Selecting above). The Department for Communities and Local Government Circular 04/2007 Planning for Travelling Showpeople also provides advice on site location and selection. Please follows the links at www.communities.gov.uk
Please note: Suggestions for sites and comments submitted should focus on planning considerations. These include loss of privacy, traffic and parking issues, noise, pollution, historic buildings, conservation, wildlife and design. Issues such as land ownership and Green Belt are also relevant. The Borough Council cannot accept any comments that may be considered racist under the Race Relations Act. Any comments that refer to generalisations, sterotypes or negative perceptions of race, ethnicity or culture cannot be considered. 50 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Economic Prosperity
3.156 The provision of an appropriate level of employment land in order to facilitate economic development forms a major element of the Core Strategy. It also promotes social inclusion through access to local shopping and services, especially for those without a car and for those in more remote parts of the Borough. As such, SADPD makes the following allocations/ designations:
Employment Areas Neighbourhood Centres
These are discussed below.
Topic 13 – Employment Areas
3.157 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Chelmsford Borough Employment Land Review, 2006 Chelmsford Tomorrow
3.158 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP2, CP22, CP23, DC48-52
Overview
3.159 Employment areas include sites with offices, research and development, industry and warehousing. The Adopted Core Strategy sets out the overall employment strategy for the Borough. This approach is focused on providing for a portfolio of sites to enable economic growth, across a variety of sectors, on a variety of sites in the period to 2021.
3.160 Chelmsford is identified as a Key Centre for Development and Change within the East of England Plan and in the context of the Plan is required to make a significant contribution to economic growth within the region (a share of 56,000 jobs in the period to 2021). The Adopted Core Strategy provides for a new Employment Area to be identified in the SADPD at Temple Farm, West Hanningfield. This will provide for the future business needs of the Borough and make an important contribution towards providing new local jobs. Such an approach is consistent with the East of England Plan and the Regional Economic Strategy.
3.161 The SADPD has a role in identifying employment sites across the Borough and designating them on the Proposals Map. Three of the existing Employment Areas within the SADPD cross into the area covered in the NCAAP. These are Chelmsford Business Park, Springfield Business Park and Hedgerows Business Park. The SADPD Potential Options document can only consider the southern boundaries that lie within its plan area. Please also refer to the NCAAP document for the proposed boundaries of these sites.
Objectives
3.162 The Borough Council seeks to allocate sites providing good, accessible locations for employment which will contribute towards providing a mix of premises and commercial activities and job opportunities. Key objectives are: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 51
Site Allocations and Notations 3
As a starting point, designate employment areas identified in the Core Strategy and Policies DC50, DC51 and DC52 Identify other established employment sites under Policies DC51 and DC52 which help to meet the Borough’s jobs targets and are considered appropriate in terms of site context and location, accessibility and existing employment use Promote the construction of employment development (Use Classes B1, B2 and B8) together with appropriate access, parking, servicing, public rights of way and landscaping off site works at Temple Farm, West Hanningfield Promote the full development of employment areas Promote the development of a Technology Park or Innovations Centre at West Hanningfield Road Business Park, Great Baddow Encourage investment to reinforce the viability of the employment area and the re-use and modernisation of long-term vacant units.
Criteria for defining Employment Areas
3.163 Employment area boundaries are drawn to:
Include the established employment area/ buildings in employment use as defined in the Use Classes Order (i.e. B1 a-c, B2 and B8 use and other uses of a similar nature) Where appropriate include land uses associated with the function of the employment area including car parking and open space Exclude employment activity which is ancillary to the main land-use e.g. agricultural storage and unauthorised employment activity Exclude landscaping belts on the periphery of employment sites Provide a logical and defensible boundary and have regard to clear barriers on the ground including roads Have regard to existing planning permissions yet to be started Provide for a new strategic Employment Area at Temple Farm Have regard to Approved Village Design Statements and Parish Plans
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.164 The sites identified are the most effective at meeting the objectives and criteria for employment areas. Further information on existing employment sites including location, tenants and vacancy levels is contained within the Chelmsford Borough Employment Land Review 2006. New Employment Areas are described below.
Temple Farm, West Hanningfield
3.165 This lies in the Metropolitan Green Belt in the south of the Borough. It is close to the B1007 junction with the A12 Trunk Road and so is well related to the strategic road network. It also has good bus links into Chelmsford which are due to increase from September 2009. In 2008, a planning application was received for the development of the site. This has been ‘called’ in by the Secretary of State for a decision, the outcome of which will inform the next version of the SADPD. 52 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Banters Lane, Great Leighs
3.166 This is an existing area of employment located on the edge of Great Leighs within the village envelope (See Site Allocation 8). It is in good condition and comprises a mix of land usage, from modern offices (Use Class B1) to storage space and warehouses (Use Class B8) and furniture showrooms. The site runs adjacent to the A131 and is therefore easily accessed from the primary road network. It is also in very close proximity to the Great Leighs Bypass Roundabout, providing access in numerous directions.
Beehive Lane Industrial Area (Beehive Works), Great Baddow
3.167 This is a small industrial estate that provides a niche industrial area that supports small-scale printing and publishing and businesses within the building industry. The area is well located for the A12 and Chelmsford’s town centre.
Site Allocations 131-153 - Employment Areas (Maps 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, 15, 30)
3.168 Table 7 - Employment Sites
Please refer to maps in Section 6.
Site Site Name Relevant Core Strategy Map Allocation Employment Policy Reference Number
131 Temple Farm, West Hanningfield DC52 Strategic Employment 30 Site
132 BAE Systems Site, West Policy DC50 3 Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow
133 Banters Lane, Great Leighs DC51 New Employment Area 15
134 Beehive Lane Industrial Area DC52 3 (Business Centre), Great Baddow
135 Beehive Lane Industrial Area DC52 New Employment Area 3 (Beehive Works), Great Baddow
136 Chelmsford Business Park, off DC51 3 Colchester Road, Springfield
137 Church Street Industrial Areas, DC51 3 Great Baddow
138 Dukes Park Industrial Estate, DC52 3 Chelmsford
139 Eastern Industrial Estate, South DC52 4 Woodham Ferrers Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 53
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Site Site Name Relevant Core Strategy Map Allocation Employment Policy Reference Number
140 Ferrers Road Industrial Area, South DC52 4 Woodham Ferrers
141 Hedgerows Business Park and ECC DC51 3 Highways Depot, Colchester Road
142 Saltcoats Industrial Estate, South DC52 4 Woodham Ferrers
143 Springfield Business Park, off DC51 3 Colchester Road
144 Winsford Way, off Waterhouse DC51 and DC52 3 Lane, Chelmsford
145 Cromar Way, off Waterhouse DC51 and DC52 3 Lane, Chelmsford
146 Widford Industrial Estate, DC51 and DC52 3 Chelmsford
147 Westway Industrial Area, DC52 3 Chelmsford
148 Mayphil Industrial Estate, DC52 5 Battlesbridge, Rettendon
149 East Hanningfield Industrial Estate, DC52 10 East Hanningfield
150 Rignals Lane Industrial Estate, DC52 13 Galleywood
151 Royal British Legion Trading Estate, DC52 9 Maldon Road, Danbury
152 Temple Wood Industrial Estate, DC52 30 West Hanningfield
153 Waltham Road Industrial Estate, DC52 7 Boreham
Rejected Options
3.169 Designate additional new employment areas and expand existing employment areas. The Borough Council has identified sufficient sites to deliver economic growth in line with the East of England Plan through the SADPD and other DPDs. 54 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
3.170 Designate sites which do not meet the criteria listed above are proposed during previous consultation. These include the former Disney Kennels on Three Mile Hill (Chelmsford), land south-east of Great Baddow, land adjacent to ASDA (SWF), Cow Watering Lane (Writtle College), Five Tree Works (West Hanningfield) and Boreham Airfield.
3.171 Promote the loss of existing established employment areas to alternative uses including residential development. This would be contrary to the Core Strategy. Rignals Lane Employment Area is therefore retained.
Topic 14 – Neighbourhood Centres
3.172 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Chelmsford Retail Study 2006 'A Plan for South Woodham Ferrers SPD'
3.173 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP6, CP25, DC3, DC5, DC63
Overview
3.174 Neighbourhood centres are an important part of community life and can provide a range of uses and services including shops, post office, hairdresser and church. Policy CP25 of the Core Strategy designates existing Neighbourhood Centres in the borough. These include
South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre Principal Neighbourhood Centres, and Local Neighbourhood Centres.
3.175 These provide an important local shopping function. However, the potential wider role of South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre and the Principal Neighbourhood Centres for further development of retail, commercial, community and residential uses is also identified alongside the wider catchments of their users.
Objectives
3.176 The Borough Council seeks to protect and enhance Neighbourhood Centres. Key objectives are:
Identify retail frontages of all Neighbourhood Centres in line with Policy DC63 of the Core Strategy Identify primary and secondary retail frontages of SWF Town Centre in line with policies of the Core Strategy and with regard to the 'A Plan for South Woodham Ferrers SPD' Designate the boundaries of SWF Town Centre and Principal Neighbourhood Centres (PNCs) and consider opportunities for potential intensification and redevelopment in line with Policy CP25.
Criteria for Defining Retail Frontages
3.177 The following criterion is applied: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 55
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Include frontages of groups of ground floor units (both vacant and occupied) that have a range of uses that serve day-to-day local needs Include frontages of units which may be in a broken run but effectively function as a local Neighbourhood Centre.
Defining Principal Neighbourhood Centres Boundaries
3.178 The following criterion is applied:
Include the main Neighbourhood Centre (groups of ground floor units [including vacant premises] with uses that serve day-to-day local needs: community, commercial, professional, financial and health related facilities and buildings and associated land uses such as car parking that add to the function of the centre) Include areas that allow for appropriate development to reinforce the function of the Neighbourhood Centre, the re-use of long-term vacant units and underused land to enable a mix of uses whilst protecting residential amenity and highway safety Exclude units, buildings and their curtilages that are separate or peripheral to the Neighbourhood Centre Wherever appropriate and possible ensure boundaries follow natural and physical features.
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.179 The following site allocations are made and show on maps in Section 6:
Site Allocations 154-181 - Neighbourhood Centres (Maps 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 13, 23, 29, 33)
3.180 Table 8 Neighbourhood Centres
Site Allocation Centre Name Type Map Number Reference
South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre
154 South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre Town 4 Centre
155 Warwick Parade Local 4
Chelmsford Urban Area
156 Gloucester Avenue Principal 3
157 The Village, Chelmer Village Principal 3
158 The Vineyards, Great Baddow Principal 3
159 Bodmin Road Local 3
160 Bryron Road Local 3
161 Corporation Road Local 3 56 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Allocation Centre Name Type Map Number Reference
162 Dorset Avenue Local 3
163 Forest Drive Local 3
164 Havengore Local 3
165 Hylands Parade Local 3
166 Kings Road Local 3
167 Meadgate Avenue Local 3
168 Melbourne Avenue Local 3
169 Meon Close Local 3
170 Robin Way Local 3
171 Sunrise Avenue Local 3
172 Trent Road Local 3
173 Waterhouse Lane Local 3
Villages
174 Bicknacre (Monks Mead) Local 6
175 Boreham (The Larches) Local 7
176 Danbury (Eves Corner, Maldon Road and Little Local 9 Baddow Road)
177 Galleywood (Watchouse Road) Local 13
178 Ramsden Heath, (Downham Road and Dowsetts) Local 23
179 Stock (Mill Road, Stock Road and The Square) Local 29
180 Writtle (Long Brandocks) Local 33
181 Writtle, (The Green, Bridge Street and St John’s Local 33 Green)
Rejected Options
3.181 Include single units or rows of shops that are too small to provide a range of day-to-day local needs in line with Core Policy DC63.
3.182 Include scattered shops not directly related to Neighbourhood Centres and/or non-Use Class A1. This includes shops along Beehive Lane, Chelmsford; Main Road/ Plantation Road, Boreham and units around Maldon Road, Danbury. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 57
Site Allocations and Notations 3
3.183 Warwick Parade Neighbourhood Centre is recommended for designation as a Principal Neighbourhood Centre (PNC) in the adopted “A Plan for South Woodham Ferrers”. However, this would be contrary to the Adopted Core Strategy and any proposals for new PNCs can only be considered as part of a review of this document.
3.184 Define boundaries of Local Neighbourhood Centres as this is not a requirement of the Adopted Core Strategy.
Picture 6 South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre 58 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Quality of Life
3.185 The Borough Council seeks to improve the quality of life for those living and working in the Borough by promoting good access to open spaces, services and facilities. As such, SADPD makes the following site allocations/ designations:
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision Community Facilities
These are discussed in turn below.
Topic 15 – Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision
3.186 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
PPG17 Assessment of Open Space, Sports and Recreation Provision Emerging Allotment Survey 2009 Chelmsford Borough Council Biodiversity Action Plan 2008-12
3.187 Relevant Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
CP12, DC39
Overview
3.188 Across the SADPD area there are numerous open spaces, sport and recreational facilities. These include strategic sites such as Country Parks, Local Parks important to the Borough and a wide range of smaller open spaces within built-up areas.
3.189 Open spaces are used for a variety of different purposes ranging from formal recreation and leisure such as playing pitches and allotment gardens to natural and semi-natural space used for informal leisure such as dog walking. These have an important role in helping to meet the needs of recreation, sport, play, biodiversity, health and education. Policies CP12 and DC39 of the Adopted Core Strategy seek to protect and enhance recreational provision across the Borough.
3.190 Consultants have undertaken, on behalf of the Borough Council, an assessment of open space, sports and recreational facilities across the Borough in line with Government guidance (PPG17). This includes various classifications of open space such as Parks and Gardens, natural and semi-natural urban greenspaces, outdoor sports facilities, allotments, community gardens, cemeteries and churchyards.
Objectives
3.191 The Borough Council is committed to protecting and enhancing open space and recreational facilities. Key objectives are:
Enhance existing and promote the creation of new open spaces, sports and recreation facilities to meet any deficiencies Allocate spaces considered to be open space within the defined limits of settlements which may be under pressure for development Promote opportunities to improve access to Marsh Farm Country Park including calming traffic speeds and revised verge alignment Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 59
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Promote appropriate new employment related to existing activities at Marsh Farm Country Park Define Bulls Lodge Quarry as an area of agriculture, recreation and visitor attraction after minerals extraction Designate Hyde Hall Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) garden under Policy CP12. Promote it as a ‘Destination Garden of both National and Regional Significance’ and approve a Masterplan to guide future development at the site in the future Have regard to the findings of the emerging Allotment Survey when considering the need to identify additional allotment sites.
Criteria for Defining
3.192 The boundaries of existing and proposed public open space, sports and recreation provision have been drawn to:
Include land comprising Country Parks, public open space, private outdoor sport grounds and allotments of amenity or recreational value to the local community Follow easily distinguishable natural or physical features wherever appropriate such as hedgerows, roads and Settlement Boundaries Have regard to the NCAAP when defining the eastern boundary of Bulls Lodge Quarry area of agriculture, recreation and visitor attraction after minerals extraction Have regard to the South Woodham Ferrers SPD in relation to Marsh Farm Country Park
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.193 The following site allocations are made and show on maps in Section 6. It is proposed that all of the open spaces identified in the PPG17 Assessment of Open Space, Sports and Recreation Provision be identified on the Proposals Map with the exception of:
Natural and semi-natural open space outside the existing or proposed urban areas and defined settlements where they are protected as part of countryside policies or other designations School Playing Fields which are specifically identified as ‘School/ Further and Higher Education’ to bring SAD in line with other DPDs Sites where planning permission has already been granted for the change of use or redevelopment for another purpose other than open space.
Site Allocations 182-189 - Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision (See all Maps)
3.194 Table 9 Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Provision
Site Allocation Location Description Map Number References
182 SADPD Plan Area Open space including public open space, See all maps private outdoor sport grounds and allotments of amenity or recreational value to the local community. 60 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Site Allocation Location Description Map Number References
183 Marsh Farm An extensive rural area managed by ECC 4 Country Park, South which surrounds SWF. It comprises a Woodham Ferrers nature reserve, a working farm and offers recreation.
184 Hylands Park, 574 acres of parkland in the south of 2, 3, 33 Writtle Chelmsford. Facilities include extensive woodland, pleasure gardens and the historical building of Hylands House.
185 Danbury Park, Over 41 acres of woodland, grassland and 2, 9 Danbury ornamental gardens approximately 4 miles east of Chelmsford.
186 Bulls Lodge Quarry New area will be developed for 1, 7 area of agriculture, agriculture, recreation and leisure post recreation and minerals extraction. Most of the site is in visitor attraction, the NCAAP excluding the NE boundary Boreham which is in SADPD.
187 Hyde Hall, A Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) 2 Rettendon garden comprising 360 acres of managed plant collections, visitor infrastructure, arable fields, meadow and woodland. RHS have a target of 160,000 visitors to Hyde Hall by 2013/14. This will require a significant investment by RHS in garden infrastructure and visitor and staff facilities. A Masterplan will sit alongside the SADPD to enable the site to be planned in a holistic and strategic manner.
188 Hitchcocks Field, Proposed New Public Open Space 9 Danbury
189 Tye Green, Good Proposed New Public Open Space 14 Easter
Rejected Options
3.195 Loss of existing open space sites to other land uses including housing and employment – this is contrary to the Core Strategy.
3.196 Allocation of new allotment sites ahead of the findings of the Parish-Wide Allotment Survey and certainty that sites are deliverable. Any suitable sites will be presented in the next version of the SADPD. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 61
Site Allocations and Notations 3
Topic 16 – Community Facilities
3.197 Evidence Base Documents
Village Design Statements Community Plan Specific plans of local service providers
3.198 Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
Spatial Strategy, CP16, DC5, CP17, DC37 Making Places SPD
Overview
3.199 The Core Strategy seeks to enhance the quality of life for people in the Borough by protecting and enhancing community facilities. These can be public or private and include leisure centres, education facilities, shopping, youth and community centres, libraries and places of worship. There is likely to be a need for provision of additional community facilities in the SADPD area in the plan period to 2021 although none have been identified at this stage.
3.200 The Borough Council has consulted specifically with key partners such as Essex County Council, The Primary Care Trust and Writtle College to determine their specific requirements for sites over this period and identify potential sites to allocate for these purposes.
3.201 We are currently in discussion with Chelmsford College regarding their proposed relocation to Chelmer Waterfront. This is subject to Government funding which is uncertain at this point in time. However, this would release their campuses along Moulsham Street and Princes Road for redevelopment – see Topic 9.
Objectives
3.202 To ensure there are sufficient community facilities to support existing and future communities. Key objectives are:
Enhance existing and promote the creation of new community facilities Ensure community facilities are accessible for all members of the community Consider opportunities for community uses as part of mixed use development Have regard to the identified needs and future proposals of service providers including ECC and The Primary Care Trust
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.203 To consider the results of this Potential Options consultation when considering sites for new or extended community facilities. To present any specific proposals for consultation in the next version of the SADPD.
Rejected Options
3.204 Allocate land for community facilities that cannot be delivered and maintained. 62 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
3 Site Allocations and Notations
Minerals and Waste
3.205 The Proposals Map will identify Minerals and Waste sites with some details provided below. More information will be within a separate Plan being prepared by Essex County Council.
Topic 17 - Minerals and Waste
3.206 Relevant Evidence Base Documents
Essex and Southend on Sea Waste Local Plan and Minerals Local Plan
Overview
3.207 Essex County Council is the planning authority responsible for minerals and waste planning. These issues are included in this document for information only. All consultations on minerals and waste sites are carried out by the County Council at the appropriate time. The existing and proposed strategies and sites are set out in the Essex and Southend on Sea Waste Local Plan and the Minerals Local Plan. At present, these sites are at:
3.208 Preferred Landfill sites for Inert Waste
Essex Showground, Great Leighs (Map 1) Danbury - St Cleres and Royal Oak (Maps 2 and 9)
3.209 Preferred Landfill Sites for Non Inert Waste
Sandon (Maps 2, 3 and 28) Brittons Hall, Roxwell (Map 1)
3.210 Preferred Sites for Sand and Gravel Extraction
Danbury – St Cleres and Royal Oak (Maps 2 and 9) Boreham - Bulls Lodge Quarry (Maps 1 and 7)
3.211 Because of their potential environmental impacts on the surrounding areas, or their potential for future development when they are worked out, they may influence decisions about future development nearby. The next stage of the Minerals Development Framework is the ‘Additional Sites Allocations Issues and Options Paper’, which will be published for consultation by Essex County Council in September 2009. Consultation on the Waste Development DPD Issues and Options will be undertaken by Essex County Council in late 2009.
Objectives
3.212 Identify the sites in the Essex and Southend on Sea Waste Local Plan, 2001 and Minerals Local Plan, 1996, and take these into account in land allocations proposed in this document. Encourage their restoration and after-use in line with existing ECC planning policies. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 63
Site Allocations and Notations 3
The Borough Council’s Potential Option
3.213 Identify existing Minerals and Waste sites on the Proposals Map (see Maps 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 and 28). Have regard to the emerging Waste Development DPD and the Minerals Development Framework which may include additional site allocations. The Minerals Development Framework may also identify Minerals Safeguarding Areas which seek to prevent the loss of and adverse impacts on minerals sites.
Rejected Options
3.214 There are no other options as these are all existing sites and Chelmsford Borough Council is not responsible for identifying and allocating new sites.
Picture 7 Sandon Park and Ride 64 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
4 Monitoring and Implementation
Part 4 Monitoring and Implementation
Introduction
4.1 It is essential that the site allocations and designations within the SADPD will be deliverable. In developing the Potential Options, the Borough Council has considered how sites will be delivered over the plan period and will put mechanisms in place to implement, monitor and review the document.
Overall steering and monitoring
4.2 There are many factors that will influence the implementation and delivery of the proposals set out in this document including land assembly, funding and market forces.
4.3 Once finalised, following this consultation, Chelmsford Borough Council will monitor and review the effectiveness of the SADPD in achieving its objectives and in encouraging the delivery of new development or protecting areas from change.
4.4 The main mechanism for monitoring will be the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR). Proposals in the SADPD will be linked to key targets and indicators, which will be monitored through the AMR. Monitoring of these indicators will reveal whether SADPD proposals are succeeding or need to be reviewed. This includes monitoring against the Borough Council’s Housing Trajectory and whether additional sites need to be brought forward to achieve the overall requirement. The AMR is produced by the Borough Council in December each year.
4.5 Performance will also be measured against Sustainability Appraisal objectives, produced independently as part of the Sustainability Appraisal process.
4.6 The Borough Council will also work in partnership with many organisations including Parish Councils, local community and business partnerships to ensure SADPD objectives and sites are achieved. The Chelmsford Tomorrow Local Delivery Mechanism (LDM) has been established to manage the implementation of infrastructure provision within the borough. The LDM has a remit to co-ordinate, manage and monitor delivery of key strategic infrastructure projects, and comprises a partnership of key stakeholders responsible for infrastructure delivery including:
Chelmsford Borough Council Essex County Council Environment Agency Government Office for the East of England (GO-East) Mid Essex Primary Care Trust East of England Development Agency
4.7 The LDM will monitor the progression of strategic infrastructure projects across Chelmsford. It will focus much of its attention on the delivery of infrastructure in North Chelmsford given the level of growth proposed in that location. However it will have an input in infrastructure projects within the SADPD plan area including ChART and Park and Ride.
Inter-dependencies
4.8 Utilities work (including sewerage and drainage) is an essential first step in preparing areas for development. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 65
Monitoring and Implementation 4
4.9 Key elements of physical infrastructure, such as the new access roads to new residential developments and the proposed new Temple Farm Employment Area are important at an early stage of the development programme. This will enable vehicle access to development sites and ensure transport routes are provided for the first new residents or occupants as soon as they move in.
4.10 Supporting infrastructure such as open spaces will also need to be phased and aligned with the delivery of new development. This will be reflected in phasing agreements concluded as part of planning permissions granted. Failure to provide infrastructure will result in constraints on delivery of new developments.
Delivering excellent development for sustainable communities
4.11 The Borough Council expects any development to work towards the best possible built outcomes by explicitly adapting regional best practice frameworks as follows:
Building for Life Standard - use of the standard as a means for monitoring design and anticipating built quality; Inspire East Excellence Framework and Essex Design Initiative Exemplar Scheme.
Picture 8 Hylands Park 66 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Part 5 Appendices
(A) Information Required for Site Submissions
5.1 The following information should be provided alongside any site specific representations that are not currently contained within the Potential Options document. This will enable the Borough Council to understand and appraise your proposal and take it into account when preparing the Submission SADPD.
Scale Map of the Site Size of the Site Details of Site Ownership Proposed Use for the Site, including scale of development Time Scale for Delivery Information on constraints effecting the site such as flooding, ecology and nature conservation, landscape features, use of the land, access to the site, impact on the highway, public transport access and contamination Information relating to need for the development and how it will achieve the objectives of the Adopted Core Strategy Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 67
Appendices 5
(B) List of Site Allocations and Designations
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
1 Metropolitan Green Belt Metrolpolitan Green Belt
2 Settlement Boundary Chelmsford Urban Area
3 Settlement Boundary South Woodham Ferrers Urban Area
4 Settlement Boundary Bicknacre
5 Settlement Boundary Boreham
6 Settlement Boundary Danbury
7 Settlement Boundary Galleywood
8 Settlement Boundary Great Leighs
9 Settlement Boundary Runwell
10 Settlement Boundary Stock
11 Settlement Boundary Writtle
12 Settlement Boundary Chatham Green
13 Settlement Boundary East Hanningfield
14 Settlement Boundary Edney Common
15 Settlement Boundary Ford End
16 Settlement Boundary Good Easter
17 Settlement Boundary Howe Green
18 Settlement Boundary Howe Street
19 Settlement Boundary Highwood (Loves Green)
20 Settlement Boundary Little Baddow
21 Settlement Boundary Margaretting
22 Settlement Boundary Ramsden Heath
23 Settlement Boundary Rettendon
24 Settlement Boundary Rettendon Place
25 Settlement Boundary Roxwell
26 Settlement Boundary Sandon
27 Settlement Boundary West Hanningfield 68 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
28 Settlement Boundary Woodham Ferrers
29 Park & Ride Area of Search Widford Park & Ride Area of Search
30 Proposed Cycle Routes Proposed Cycle Routes
31 Special Policy Area Great Leighs Racecourse
32 Special Policy Area Sandford Mill
33 Special Policy Area Hanningfield Reservoir Treatment Works
34 Special Policy Area Writtle College
35 Green Wedges River Chelmer North Green Wedge
River Chelmer / Blackwater Navigation East 36 Green Wedges Green Wedge
37 Green Wedges River Can / Wid West Green Wedge
38 Coastal Protection Belt Coastal Protection Belt
39 Protected Lanes Riffhams Lane
40 Protected Lanes Back Lane
41 Protected Lanes Clatterford End
42 Protected Lanes Shorts Farm Lane
43 Protected Lanes Mill Road
44 Protected Lanes Tituswell Lane
45 Protected Lanes Goodmans Lane 2
46 Protected Lanes Paulk Hall Lane
47 Protected Lanes Whites Lane
48 Protected Lanes Rectory Lane
49 Protected Lanes Littley Green Road
50 Protected Lanes Littley Park Lane
51 Protected Lanes Nathans Lane 1
52 Protected Lanes Ingatestone Road
53 Protected Lanes Graces Lane
54 Protected Lanes Chapel Lane Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 69
Appendices 5
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
55 Protected Lanes Hurrells Lane
56 Protected Lanes Holybread Lane
57 Protected Lanes New Lodge Chase
58 Protected Lanes Tofts Chase
59 Protected Lanes Scurvy Hall Lane
60 Protected Lanes Hyde Road
61 Protected Lanes Ivy Barn Lane
62 Protected Lanes Swan Lane
63 Protected Lanes Handley Green Lane
64 Protected Lanes Bedfords Hill
65 Protected Lanes Ford End Road
66 Protected Lanes Blakes Lane
67 Protected Lanes Vicarage Road
68 Protected Lanes Grange Road
69 Protected Lanes Park Road
70 Protected Lanes Bury Road
71 Protected Lanes Radley Green Road
72 Protected Lanes Farmbridge End Road
73 Protected Lanes Woodhill Common Road
74 Protected Lanes Sporehams Lane
75 Protected Lanes Broomwood Lane
76 Protected Lanes Goatsmoor Lane
77 Protected Lanes Edwins Hall Road
78 Protected Lanes Newney Green
79 Protected Lanes Church Road
80 Protected Lanes Boreham Road / Cole Hill / Boreham Road
81 Protected Lanes Mill Lane 2
82 Protected Lanes Gay Bowers Road 1 70 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
83 Protected Lanes Capons Lane 1
84 Protected Lanes Gay Bowers Lane
85 Protected Lanes Black Chapel Lane
86 Protected Lanes Spring Elms Lane
87 Protected Lanes Mill Lane
88 Protected Lanes Lower Stock Road 2
89 Protected Lanes Hall Lane
90 Protected Lanes West Hanningfield Road 1
91 Protected Lanes Lower Stock Road 1
92 Protected Lanes Workhouse Lane
93 Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme Chelmsford Flood Alleviation Scheme
Chelmsford College, Moulsham Street 94 Housing Proposal Site Campus
95 Housing Proposal Site Chelmsford College, Princes Road Campus
96 Housing Proposal Site Government Offices, Beeches Road
97 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 1 to 7 Springfield Park Lane
98 Land south of Clements Close, part of 61 Housing Proposal Site Penbertan Lodge
99 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 15 Clarence Close
100 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 23 to 83 Sandford Road
101 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 71 – 81 Byron Road
102 Goldlay Gardens, Essex Library Housing Proposal Site Headquarters
103 Housing Proposal Site Braemar Avenue, Moulsham Street
104 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 22 Timsons Lane
105 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 12 and 16 West Avenue
106 Housing Proposal Site Land rear of 17 – 37 Beech’s Drive
107 Housing Proposal Site Baddow Road, Chelwater
108 Housing Proposal Site ASDA Car Park, Chelmer Village Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 71
Appendices 5
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
109 Housing Proposal Site Parks Depot, Waterhouse Lane
110 Part of the car park of South Woodham Housing Proposal Site Ferrers station
111 Housing Proposal Site Car Park, Coval Lane
112 Boreham - Land between Shearer's Way Housing Proposal Site and The Cock Inn, Main Road, Boreham
113 Edney Common - Land at ‘The Nest’, Housing Proposal Site Highwood Road
114 Galleywood - Land at rear of 24 to 70 Pyms Housing Proposal Site Road, Beehive Lane
115 Ramsden Heath - Windsor Road Trading Housing Proposal Site Estate
116 Rettendon - Moorland Industrial Estate, Housing Proposal Site Tileworks Lane
117 Writtle - Land surrounding British Telecom, Housing Proposal Site Ongar Road
118 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Vicarage Lane, Great Baddow
119 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land off Church Street/ Smithers Drive
120 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land east of Little Fields, Danbury
121 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land adjacent Runwell House
122 Land south of the Brewers Arms Public Proposed Affordable Housing Site House, Main Road
123 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land at Back Lane, East Hanningfield
124 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land at Rochester House, Main Road
125 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land rear of Bank End
126 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land off Church Green
127 Proposed Affordable Housing Site Land at Middlemead, West Hanningfield
128 Specialist Residential Accommodation Waltham Road, Boreham
129 Specialist Residential Accommodation Saint Giles, Moor Hall Lane, Bicknacre
130 Moorland Industrial Estate, Tileworks Lane, Specialist Residential Accommodation East Hanningfield
131 Employment Areas Temple Farm, West Hanningfield 72 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
132 BAE Systems Site, West Hanningfield Road, Employment Areas Great Baddow
133 Employment Areas Banters Lane, Great Leighs
134 Beehive Lane Industrial Area (Business Employment Areas Centre), Great Baddow
135 Beehive Lane Industrial Area (Beehive Employment Areas Works), Great Baddow
136 Chelmsford Business Park, off Colchester Employment Areas Road
137 Church Street Industrial Areas, Great Employment Areas Baddow
138 Employment Areas Dukes Park Industrial Estate, Chelmsford
139 Ferrers Road Industrial Area, South Employment Areas Woodham Ferrers
140 Hedgerows Business Park and ECC Employment Areas Highways Depot, Colchester Road
142 Saltcoats Industrial Estate, South Woodham Employment Areas Ferrers
143 Springfield Business Park, off Colchester Employment Areas Road
144 Winsford Way, off Waterhouse Lane, Employment Areas Chelmsford
145 Cromar Way, off Waterhouse Lane, Employment Areas Chelmsford
146 Employment Areas Widford Industrial Area, Chelmsford
147 Employment Areas Westway Industrial Area, Chelmsford
Mayphil Industrial Estate, Battlesbridge, 148 Employment Areas Rettendon
East Hanningfield Industrial Estate, East 149 Employment Areas Hanningfield
150 Employment Areas Rignals Lane Industrial Estate, Galleywood
Royal British Legion Trading Estate, Maldon 151 Employment Areas Road, Danbury Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 73
Appendices 5
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
Temple Wood Industrial Estate, West 152 Employment Areas Hanningfield
153 Employment Areas Waltham Road Industrial Estate, Boreham
154 Neighbourhood Centres South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre
155 Neighbourhood Centres Warwick Parade
156 Neighbourhood Centres Gloucester Avenue
157 Neighbourhood Centres The Village, Chelmer Village
158 Neighbourhood Centres The Vineyards, Great Baddow
159 Neighbourhood Centres Bodmin Road
160 Neighbourhood Centres Bryron Road
161 Neighbourhood Centres Corporation Road
162 Neighbourhood Centres Dorset Avenue
163 Neighbourhood Centres Forest Drive
164 Neighbourhood Centres Havengore
165 Neighbourhood Centres Hylands Parade
166 Neighbourhood Centres Kings Road
167 Neighbourhood Centres Meadgate Avenue
168 Neighbourhood Centres Melbourne Avenue
169 Neighbourhood Centres Meon Close
170 Neighbourhood Centres Robin Way
171 Neighbourhood Centres Sunrise Avenue
172 Neighbourhood Centres Trent Road
173 Neighbourhood Centres Waterhouse Lane
174 Neighbourhood Centres Bicknacre (Monks Mead)
175 Neighbourhood Centres Boreham (The Larches)
Danbury (Eves Corner, Maldon Road and 176 Neighbourhood Centres Little Baddow Road)
177 Neighbourhood Centres Galleywood (Watchouse Road) 74 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Number Site Topic Site Allocation/ Designation
Ramsden Heath, (Downham Road and 178 Neighbourhood Centres Dowsetts)
Stock (Mill Road, Stock Road and The 179 Neighbourhood Centres Square)
180 Neighbourhood Centres Writtle (Long Brandocks)
Writtle, (The Green, Bridge Street and St 181 Neighbourhood Centres John’s Green)
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 182 Provision SADPD Plan Area
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Marsh Farm Country Park, South 183 Provision Woodham Ferrers
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 184 Provision Hylands Park, Writtle
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 185 Provision Danbury Park, Danbury
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation Bulls Lodge Quarry area of agriculture, 186 Provision recreation and leisure
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 187 Provision Hyde Hall, West Hanningfield
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 188 Provision Hitchcocks Field, Danbury
Open Spaces, Sports and Recreation 189 Provision Tye Green, Good Easter
(C) Abbreviations
AAP—Area Action Plan
AMR—Annual Monitoring Report
CBC—Chelmsford Borough Council
ChART—Chelmsford Area Rapid Transit
CHP—Chelmer Housing Partnership
CLG—Communities and Local Government
Core Strategy—Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document
CPO—Compulsory Purchase Order Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 75
Appendices 5
CTCAAP—Chelmsford Town Centre Area Action Plan
DPD—Development Plan Document
ECC—Essex County Council
EERA—East of England Regional Assembly
GO-East— Government Office for the East of England
Ha—Hectare
IDP— Integrated Development Programme
LDD—Local Development Document
LDF—Local Development Framework
LDM—Local Delivery Mechanism
LTP—Local Transport Plan
ODPM—Office for the Deputy Prime Minister
NCAAP—North Chelmsford Area Action Plan
PPG2— Planning Policy Guidance 2
PPG17— Planning Policy Guidance 17
PPS12—Planning Policy Statement 12
RHS— Royal Horticultural Society
RSS— East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS)
SA— Integrated Sustainability Appraisal
SAC— Special Areas of Conservation
SADPD—Site Allocations Development Plan Document
SHMA—Strategic Housing Market Assessment
SPD—Supplementary Planning Document
SWF—South Woodham Ferrers
UCS—Urban Capacity Site 76 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
(D) Schedule of Core Strategy Policies
CP1 Securing Sustainable Development
CP2 The Borough-Wide Spatial Strategy
CP3 Phasing of Development
CP4 Securing Infrastructure
CP5 Containing Urban Growth
CP6 Promoting Urban Renaissance
CP7 Area Action Plans
CP8 Promoting Accessibility
CP9 Protecting Areas of Natural and Built Heritage and Archaeological Importance
CP10 Protection from Flooding
CP11 Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy and Recycling
CP12 Protecting and Enhancing Recreational Provision
CP13 Minimising Environmental Impact
CP14 Environmental Quality and Landscape Character
CP15 Meeting the Housing Needs of Our Communities
CP16 Promoting Social Inclusion
CP17 Reducing Deprivation
CP18 Providing New Community and Social Facilities in Major New Development
CP19 Improving Links Between Developments
CP20 Achieving Well Designed High Quality Places
CP21 Ensuring Buildings are Well Designed
CP22 Securing Economic Growth
CP23 Reinforcing the Regional Role of Chelmsford
CP24 Promoting Chelmsford’s Role as a Regional Transport Node
CP25 Supporting South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre and Neighbourhood Centres
CP26 Freight Transport Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 77
Appendices 5
DC1 Controlling development in the Metropolitan Green Belt
DC2 Controlling Development in the Countryside Beyond the Metropolitan Green Belt
DC3 Managing Development Density in Different Locations
DC4 Protecting Existing Amenity
DC5 Securing Mixed Uses in Major Developments in the Town Centres and Principal Neighbourhood Centres
DC6 Criteria for Transport Assessments
DC7 Vehicle Parking Standards at Developments
DC8 Health Impact Assessments
DC9 Green Wedges
DC10 Coastal Protection Belt
DC11 Replacement Dwellings in The Countryside
DC12 Infilling in The Countryside
DC13 Sites of Biodiversity and Geological Value
DC14 Protected Trees and Hedges
DC15 Protected Lanes
DC16 Development Adjacent to Watercourses
DC17 Conservation Areas
DC18 Listed Buildings
DC19 Scheduled Ancient Monuments
DC20 Registered Parks and Gardens
DC21 Archaeology
DC22 Areas of Flood Risk
DC23 Renewable Energy
DC24 Energy Efficient Design and Use of Materials
DC25 Water Efficiency and Sustainable Drainage Systems
DC26 Contaminated Land
DC27 Development on or lying near or adjacent to Hazardous Substance Sites 78 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
DC28 Air Quality
DC29 Amenity and Pollution
DC30 Protecting Existing Housing
DC31 The Provision of Affordable Housing
DC32 Rural Housing Need
DC33 Agricultural Workers Dwellings
DC34 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation
DC35 Specialist Residential Accommodation
DC36 Accessible and Adaptable Developments
DC37 Protecting Existing Local Community Services and Facilities
DC38 Promoting Sport, Leisure, Recreation and Tourism
DC39 Protecting and Enhancing Open Spaces and Indoor Sports Facilities
DC40 Public Open Space for New Residential Developments
DC41 Traffic Management Measures
DC42 Site Planning
DC43 Promoting Public Art in New Development
DC44 Private Amenity Space
DC45 Achieving High Quality Development
DC46 Sub-Division of Dwellings
DC47 Extensions to Dwellings
DC48 Employment Areas
DC49 Range of Unit Sizes
DC50 Promotion of Employment Clusters
DC51 Location of Business Development
DC52 Industrial and Warehouse Development
DC53 Employment Uses Within Rural Areas
DC54 Entertainment and Hot Food Uses
DC55 Hotel and Visitor Accommodation Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 79
Appendices 5
DC56 Farm Diversification
DC57 Re-Use of Rural Buildings
DC58 Telecommunications
DC59 Primary Frontages in Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers
DC60 Secondary Frontages in Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers
DC61 Park and Ride
DC62 Public Car Parking Provision
DC63 Neighbourhood Centres
DC64 Car Parking Provision in South Woodham Ferrers Town Centre 80 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
(E) Reasons for the Potential and Rejected Sites for Housing and Affordable Housing
Bicknacre
5.2 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.3 Land South of Brewers Arms Public House
5.4 Reasons:
5.5 Bicknacre enjoys a variety of facilities including a primary school, shops and a good bus route. As such, it is considered suitable for some new affordable housing development. A local housing needs survey undertaken in 2008 identified 39 households with a current or future housing need. The potential site is well connected with good accessibility and is a logical extension to the boundary. There is also an opportunity for footpath links into the existing residential area to the north.
5.6 Rejected Options:
5.7 N/A
Boreham
5.8 Potential Option for Proposed New Housing:
5.9 Land adjacent to the Cock Inn, Main Road
5.10 Reasons:
5.11 Boreham has a wide range of community services and facilities including a primary school and shops. As such, it is considered suitable for some new housing development. The potential site is close to bus stops, is easily accessible and a ‘brownfield’ site. It is considered a logical inclusion and would unify existing development along Main Road. The Boreham Village Design Statement also encourages opportunities to improve this land. Special consideration would be given to protect and enhance the adjoining Conservation Area.
5.12 Rejected Options:
Land at The Lion Inn - Development would harm the open character of this area and encroach the gap between Boreham and Chelmsford which is contrary to the Village Design Statement. Land at the Chase – Development would harm the character of the open countryside. There are also difficulties with access. Land at Old Hall Church – This would comprise backland development with little prospect of road frontage. This would be harmful to the character of the village. There is also a covenant on the land preventing residential development. Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 81
Appendices 5
Chatham Green
5.13 Chatham Green lies close to the A130 and comprises a linear development of properties with some commercial activity in the centre. It is very rural in character and appearance. It is also a small rural settlement with limited community services. As such, it is not considered suitable for further development. New Local Needs Affordable Housing is proposed in the Parish at Little Waltham. These proposals are addressed in the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan.
Danbury
5.14 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.15 Land East of Little Fields
5.16 Reasons:
5.17 Danbury is considered suitable for some new affordable housing as it is well served by public transport and has a variety of community facilities including schools, shops, sites for employment and a doctor’s surgery. The potential site has good access and naturally follows the built form of Danbury.
5.18 Rejected Options:
Land East of Mill Fields – The site is agricultural land on the edge of the village. This area is well defined and not well-connected to the rest of Danbury. Land at Danecroft, Woodhill Road – This would lead to undesirable backland development that would be out of keeping with the existing development pattern and density.
East Hanningfield
5.19 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.20 Land at Back Lane
5.21 Reasons:
5.22 East Hanningfield provides a wide range of services including a primary school, employment area, shop and pub and is considered suitable for affordable housing. A Local Housing Needs Survey conducted in 2003 identified 27 households with a current or future housing need. A scheme of 12 new affordable homes was recently completed at Old Church Road. The site is well connected, accessible and will round-off the village envelope. It will also help to meet an outstanding local need for affordable homes.
5.23 Rejected Options:
Land west of Geffrey Close – The site would extend the village envelope too far to the west and imbalance its form. Field rear of Henley Ridge, Old Church Road – This would amount to undesirable backland development and has no obvious access. Land West of Abbey Fields – This would amount to undesirable backland development. This site also has poor access. 82 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Land rear of The Chase - The site would extend the village too far to the north and spread development into attractive countryside. Land North of The Gables – The site would imbalance the village boundary and is not considered readily accessible.
Edney Common
5.24 Potential Option for Proposed New Housing:
5.25 The Nest
5.26 Reasons:
5.27 The site is an opportunity to redevelop a ‘brownfield site’ which currently has non-conforming uses. It lies adjacent to the built form and could be readily accessed. It has the potential to provide around 30 new homes of which 35% would be affordable.
5.28 Rejected Option:
Land Opposite Reynolds Garage – Development here would compromise the open character of Edney Common by removing a large piece of Green Belt from the centre of the settlement.
Ford End
5.29 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.30 N/A
5.31 Reasons:
5.32 Ford End is a small but compact settlement lying on the A130. The boundary of the village is generally well defined consisting of ribbon development and some in depth development to the west of Main Road. Although Ford End has a range of community facilities which include a primary school it essentially has a rural and open character set within an area of attractive countryside. New development would have a significant detrimental impact on the rural character and environment of the area. As such, there are no potential options in Ford End.
5.33 Rejected Options:
Land Adjacent to Bryony House – The site would lead to coalescence of the two village envelopes in Ford End which would adversely affect the character and form of the village. Furthermore, this site is very elevated and site access could be problematic. Land at Home Pastures – the site would be poorly connected and lead to undesirable backland development harmful to local character.
Galleywood
5.34 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.35 N/A
5.36 Reasons: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 83
Appendices 5
5.37 Galleywood is one of the largest settlements in the Borough and has a population of around 3,450. Galleywood has a wide range of community services and a frequent bus service. However, it is surrounded by attractive countryside and open space including Galleywood Common in the south and Chelmer Park to the north. The edge of the built-up area is generally well defined. Further development around Galleywood is undesirable as it could weaken the gap between the village and Chelmsford’s Urban Area.
5.38 Rejected Options:
Land Rear of 431 and 433 Beehive Lane – The allocation would be poorly connected to the village and extend Galleywood further north towards Chelmsford which would be contrary to the Approved Village Design Statement. Land at Galleyend – The site would be poorly connected and result in inappropriate backland development. Land South of 33 Rignals Lane – This would spread development into area of attractive open countryside, adversely affect views of existing properties and add to traffic on Rignals Lane.
Good Easter
5.39 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.40 N/A
5.41 Reasons:
5.42 Good Easter is a small, compact settlement with a very strongly defined character and a Conservation Area which covers about half the village. It is quite isolated in the countryside and has no school, village shop or regular bus service. As such, it is not considered suitable for new development.
5.43 Rejected Option:
Land at Southfields – The site would not be a logical extension of the village envelope and there are not sufficient facilities in Good Easter to support additional growth.
Great Leighs
5.44 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.45 Land North of Rochester Farm
5.46 Reasons:
5.47 Great Leighs is well served with local facilities including a primary school, post office and shop, place of worship and two pubs. It is directly on a main road and well served by buses with a frequency of more than 5 buses per hour. It is considered suitable for some new affordable housing development. The potential site will round off development along Main Road and is readily accessible.
5.48 Rejected Options:
Land West of Castle Close – access would be problematic as Castle Close is narrow and unmade. It would also spread development into an area of countryside which is very open. 84 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Land East of Helen How – Development here would encroach on what is open countryside and be detrimental to the village character. Land between 158 and 170 Main Road – The site provides an attractive gap between built development into the open countryside which should be protected.
Highwood
5.49 Reasons:
5.50 Highwood is a small and well defined settlement in the Green Belt consisting, for the most part, of ribbon development along the Highwood Road. The surrounding countryside is very open and attractive. Although it has a primary school the bus service is less than 1 every 2 hours. It is not considered suitable for new residential development.
Howe Green
5.51 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.52 N/A
5.53 Reasons:
5.54 Howe Green is a relatively small village in the south of the Borough surrounded by agricultural land. Although it is close to the A12 and A130 it has a limited bus service. The village also lacks facilities and services such as a shop and school. As such, it is not considered suitable for some new residential development.
5.55 Rejected Options:
Land Opposite Orchard View – Development here would spread into the surrounding open countryside. Land Rear of Briarlands – This would create undesirable backland development with poor accessibility. Land at Peach House – The site is poorly connected to the rest of Howe Green.
Howe Street
5.56 Howe Street is a small, compact settlement consisting of development within the triangle of land created by the former A130, Lucks Lane and Parsonage Lane. The area is located in an area of attractive landscape. Expansion of the built-up area into the surrounding countryside would be undesirable. The village is not considered suitable for further development due to its lack of community facilities, public transport and environmental constraints including Flood Zone in the north and Great Waltham Conservation Area and Registered Park and Garden in the south. New affordable housing is proposed in the Parish at Great Waltham. These proposals are addressed in the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan.
Little Baddow
5.57 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.58 N/A
5.59 Reasons: Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 85
Appendices 5
5.60 Little Baddow is a relatively dispersed settlement located in the northern part of the Danbury Ridge in an area of very attractive countryside. It has limited services and facilities. The village is in close proximity to a cluster of SSSIs and Local Wildlife Sites. Much of the development in this area is semi-rural in character comprising scattered dwellings in large gardens with mature landscaping and loose ribbon of development along The Ridge and North Hill. These contribute to the special character of the settlement. On this basis Little Baddow is not considered suitable for further expansion.
5.61 Rejected Option:
Land South of 1 North Hill and Land North of Cock Farm – The sites provides local amenity space site. Development would further harm the unique rural character and special nature conservation value of the area.
Margaretting
5.62 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.63 Land Rear of 1-8 Bank End Cottages
5.64 Reasons:
5.65 Margaretting is a small settlement with a population around 800. It benefits from close proximity to the A12 and is bordered entirely by Metropolitan Green Belt. It has a primary school and a frequent bus service. A Local Housing Needs Survey conducted in 2006 identified 33 households with a current or future housing need. The Margaretting Village Design Statement approved in March 2007 seeks to provide for new affordable housing for local people. As such, it is considered suitable for some new affordable housing development. The potential site would provide new homes on land with good access to village facilities.
5.66 Rejected Options:
Land south of 4 Glenside, Parsonage Lane – The site would extend built development into the Green Belt and the village envelope too far south. Land south of Larmar Engineering – This is an attractive area of green space. Development here would harm the setting and character of the village. Former Service Station – The site is not well connected to the rest of the village.
Morelands
5.67 Potential Option for Housing and Specialist Residential Accommodation:
5.68 Reasons:
5.69 Morelands is a ‘brownfield’ site that lies in South Hanningfield not far from the A130. The village has no local amenities due to the small size of the settlement. The potential site includes a substantial amount of land occupied by uses related to the storage and dismantling of vehicles, small workshop garages, and abandoned vehicle tyres. Large parts of the site currently are degraded by unauthorised uses and activities which now leave the site requiring significant environmental improvement. Development for new residential development and Special Residential Accommodation could provide landscape enhancements, environmental improvements and the provision of additional specialist housing to meet identified local needs. 86 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
5.70 Rejected Option:
5.71 N/A
Ramsden Heath
5.72 Potential Option for Proposed New Housing:
5.73 Windsor Road Trading Estate
5.74 Reasons:
5.75 Ramsden Heath is a village located to the south of Chelmsford in the Metropolitan Green Belt. The main part of the village is relatively well defined but there are also ribbons of development outwards both to the west and east. The village has a small number of shops, pubs, a primary school and sports pitches. The potential site is well related to existing services and provides an opportunity to redevelop a ‘brownfield site’. It also has the potential to provide some new affordable housing with supporting open space.
5.76 Rejected Options:
Land rear of Dovedale Close – This is in agricultural use and is very open and rural in character. Development would be undesirable and harm the purposes of the Green Belt Land north of Telephone Exchange, Mill Lane - This is agricultural land in the Green Belt. Although close to village facilities the existing road access is poor and development would harm the views into open countryside enjoyed by existing properties Land off Oak Road - This would spread development into the Green Belt and harm local character. Existing road access is also poor.
Rettendon
5.77 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.78 N/A
5.79 Reasons:
5.80 Rettendon is a small settlement set in attractive countryside with extensive views in the south of the borough. The settlement takes the form of ribbon development along both sides of East Hanningfield Road with limited development in depth on the south side. The village has limited services and facilities. As such, there are no potential options for new affordable housing in Rettendon.
5.81 Rejected Option:
Land at Crossways – Development here would not follow the existing form of the village and could harm local character.
Rettendon Place
5.82 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.83 N/A Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 87
Appendices 5
5.84 Reasons:
5.85 Rettendon Place is a small settlement in the south of the borough that is well connected to the A130. It has a primary school, day nursery and regular bus service. However, the village is very well defined and there are no suitable sites for new affordable housing.
5.86 Rejected Options:
Land opposite Day Nursery, Main Road – This would spread development into the Green Belt which is very open in this area. Development would harm the character and setting of the village. Land rear of Rettendon Primary School – this site has a distinct rural character and development would harm the setting of the village and spread development into agricultural land.
Roxwell
5.87 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.88 Land at Church Green
5.89 Reasons:
5.90 Roxwell is a small settlement to the north-west of Chelmsford that is surrounded entirely by Metropolitan Green Belt. It has a Conservation Area and a population of around 1,000. The village has a number of facilities which include a post office, pub, primary school, playground, church and village hall. It also has a limited bus service. As such, it is considered suitable for some limited new affordable housing development to meet local needs. The potential site is well connected to the rest of Roxwell and there is already good access.
5.91 Rejected Option:
Land at Green Lane – This site is also accessible although is not as well connected to the heart of the village as the potential option.
Runwell
5.92 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.93 Land adjacent Runwell House
5.94 Reasons:
5.95 Runwell has a densely built-up in character bordered entirely by Metropolitan Green Belt. It has various shops and facilities, its own school and good transport links. As such, it is considered suitable for some new affordable housing. The site is well connected to village services and has the potential to create an attractive frontage development.
5.96 Rejected Option:
Land rear of 91 to 115 Brock Hill – The site would undesirable backland development within the Green Belt. 88 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
5 Appendices
Sandon
5.97 Sandon is a small village well connected to the A12. It has limited community services which include a pub and village hall, although is within walking distance of Sandon Secondary School. It is also very well defined and surrounded by open countryside and public open space. As such, there are no suitable opportunities for further village expansion for new affordable housing.
Stock
5.98 Reasons:
5.99 Stock village is surrounded entirely by Metropolitan Green Belt. It is substantially built-up in character although much of its attractiveness derives from the feeling of spaciousness created by the relatively low density development in areas such as Mill Road. The centre of the village contains a number of historic buildings and is a Conservation Area. The village is well catered for in terms of existing facilities. These include a pre-school, primary school, library, shops and health services. It also has a good bus service. An affordable housing development was recently completed in the village. A further site is not considered appropriate.
5.100 Rejected Options:
Land off School Lane / rear of Fosters Close – this area is very rural in character and development here would be undesirable. Land off Well Lane – this site would spread development further into the countryside and access is likely to be problematic. Land adjacent to 20-26 Mill Lane – this would push built development into attractive countryside and the site is further constrained by protected trees along its boundary. Land rear off Meadowside – this site would create undesirable backland development within the Green Belt.
Woodham Ferrers
5.101 The settlement of Woodham Ferrers consists of three small built-up areas on the B1418 separated by scattered frontage development. The southern section is the original centre of the village and contains a number of historic buildings. The village is set in attractive countryside with extensive views, especially to the west and south. Although the village has a primary school, it has limited other facilities and bus service. As such, it is not considered suitable for new affordable housing. This is proposed elsewhere in the Parish at Bicknacre.
West Hanningfield
5.102 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.103 Land east of Middlemead
5.104 Reasons:
5.105 West Hanningfield village is surrounded by open fields and set within the Metropolitan Green Belt. Although the village does not have a recognisable centre the main developed area is characterised by linear development along Church Road and Helmons Lane. It has a primary school, pub, place of worship, Village Hall, children’s playground and Playing Fields. It also has a limited bus service. A local housing needs survey undertaken in 2007 identified 24 households with a current or Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 89
Appendices 5 future housing need. The Parish Council have an Affordable Housing Working Group which has been exploring potential sites. As such, the village is considered suitable for an affordable housing site. The potential site is reasonably well connected to the rest of the village and would contribute to a clearer village envelope.
5.106 Rejected Options:
Land west of Helmons Lane – access would be awkward via a narrow road and it would back onto existing houses. Land west of Agricultural Cottages, Church Road – Permitting development here would spread development into the open countryside and have an adverse impact on surrounding properties. Land east of Parages - the site would spread development on the outskirts of the village, is not well connected to village services and may have an adverse impact on the character of this area. Land off Church Road - This is centrally located in the village boundary. However there is no existing access and is the only open space on the south side of Church Road. It is also covered in part by Protected Trees. For these reasons it is not considered a potential site.
Writtle
5.107 Potential Option for Affordable Housing:
5.108 N/A
5.109 Reasons:
5.110 Being one of the larger villages in the borough Writtle is well facilitated with various shops, a junior school, infant school, library and doctors surgery. The bus route that serves Writtle also operates at a frequency of 4 buses per hour. However, the village is very well defined with no appropriate opportunities for new affordable housing development.
5.111 Rejected Options:
Land rear of 19 and 21 Lordship Road – this is a prominent site that would reduce the open gap between the village and the College Campus. This is contrary to the Approved Village Design Statement Land to the rear of Guys Farm - further development in the area would increase traffic on village roads and adversely affect the overall appearance and character of the area. Land south of 29 Paradise Road – development would harm the open rural character of this area and the outlook of existing properties. 90 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
6 Mapping
Part 6 Mapping
Legend
Map 1 Borough North
Map 2 Borough South
Map 3 Chelmsford Urban Area
Map 4 South Woodham Ferrers Urban Area
Map 5 Battlesbridge
Map 6 Bicknacre Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 91
Mapping 6
Map 7 Boreham
Map 8 Chatham Green
Map 9 Danbury
Map 10 East Hanningfield
Map 11 Edney Common
Map 12 Ford End
Map 13 Galleywood 92 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
6 Mapping
Map 14 Good Easter
Map 15 Great Leighs
Map 16 Highwood (Loves Green)
Map 17 Howe Green
Map 18 Howe Street
Map 19 Little Baddow
Map 20 Margaretting Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options Chelmsford Borough Council 93
Mapping 6
Map 21 Morelands
Map 22 Pleshey
Map 23 Ramsden Heath
Map 24 Rettendon
Map 25 Rettendon Place
Map 26 Roxwell
Map 27 Runwell
Map 28 Sandon 94 Chelmsford Borough Council Site Allocations Development Plan Document Potential Options
6 Mapping
Map 29 Stock
Map 30 Temple Farm and Temple Wood
Map 31 West Hanningfield and Hanningfield Reservoir Treatment Work
Map 32 Woodham Ferrers
Map 33 Writtle