DOCSLIB.ORG

Zero Carbon Community – “Designing a Green Village in Kastoria Region” 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zero Carbon Community – “Designing a Green Village in Kastoria Region” 2 αειφορική συμβουλευτική Ε.Π.Ε. ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΜΕΝΗ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΞΗ Konstantinos Dimopoulos AEIFORIKI CONSULTING DIPOTAMIA : ZERO CARBON COMMUNITY – “DESIGNING A GREEN VILLAGE IN KASTORIA REGION” 2 Green Villages: The Program • Program: Green Agricultural and Insular Villages: New Model for Growth • Authority: Center for Renewable Energy Sources, Athens, Greece (www.cres.gr) • Funding: 50 mil.€ • Targets: Using energy saving measures and renewable technologies, to achieve Zero Carbon Equilibrium or Zero Energy Equilibrium • Long term: Pilot projects, with local characteristics, demonstrating the “Sustainable Growth” model WITH FUNDING FROM GREECE AND E.U. 3 Dipotamia : Zero Carbon Village • Dipotamia: Small village, part of Nestorio municipality, in Kastoria region • 456 inhabitants • 230 domestic (active) and 5 public buildings • Main activities: agriculture and livestock • Regional activities: logging and fur industry • Production of approx. 70.000 tn wood +15% residues, annually • Tourism activities: hunting tourism in Grammos mountains, River Party in Nestorio 4 Location: 5 Dipotamia 6 Dipotamia : Energy Consumption Electricity Heating (oil) Petrol Diesel LPG Solar Biomass Total T.O.E. Public Buildings 1,6 29,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,8 Infrastructure 4,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,2 Street lighting 11,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 11,1 Domestic sector 53,4 328,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,1 957,4 1.343,4 Commercial buildings 13,5 260,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 274,0 Subtotal 83,8 618,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,1 957,4 1.664,0 Buildings, Buildings, Infrastructure Public vehicles 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,3 Private vehicles 0,0 0,0 166,5 3,3 3,2 0,0 0,0 173,0 Commercial transportation 0,0 0,0 48,8 42,2 0,6 0,0 0,0 91,6 Subtotal 0,0 0,0 215,3 53,8 3,8 0,0 0,0 272,9 Transportation Total energy consumption 83,8 618,7 215,3 53,8 3,8 4,1 957,4 1.936,9 Total energy consumption [MWh] 979 7.164 2.512 582 83 48 11.170 22.540 7 Dipotamia : Carbon Emissions Electricity Heating (oil) Petrol Diesel LPG Solar Biomass Total tnCO2 Public Buildings 19,0 83,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 102,2 Infrastructure 47,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 47,8 Street lighting 112,9 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 112,9 Domestic sector 542,0 907,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1.449,1 Commercial buildings 137,5 729,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 866,6 Subtotal 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 Buildings, Buildings, Infrastructure 859,2 1719,4 2.578,6 Public vehicles 0,0 0,0 0,0 24,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 24,5 Private vehicles 0,0 0,0 454,0 9,6 7,5 0,0 0,0 471,1 Commercial transportation 0,0 0,0 133,2 124,1 1,5 0,0 0,0 258,8 Subtotal Transportation 0,0 0,0 587,2 158,2 9,0 0,0 0,0 754,4 Total carbon emissions 859,2 1719,4 587,2 158,2 9,0 0,0 0,0 3.333,0 8 Dipotamia : Energy figure • Houses are the largest energy consumer • Biomass is the main energy source of domestic heating (2/3 of total). Inhabitants purchase the necessary wood supplies in discount price from the local timber association. • Wood is usually burned in Energy comsumption stoves, with less than 50% 5% 2% 1% Public Buildings 9% efficiency Infrastructure 14% Street lighting • Oil and electricity consumption Domestic sector 69% and private transportation is Commercial buildings the main CO2 emissions source Public vehicles Private vehicles 9 Dipotamia : Action Plan Energy Saving Energy Production • Improvements in building’s • Centralized energy unit: envelope in 183 domestic • Installation of a 3,5 MW, hot buildings and 5 public water biomass boiler. buildings • Development of a district • Installation of 118 LED lights, heating network replacing 125W HQI. • Installation of a 0,6 MW ORC cogeneration plant • Installation of energy efficient pumps for potable • Electricity is supplied to the distribution network with water supply. feed-in tariff • Purchase of one 1,5 tn, 7kW • Heating bills are collected electric garbage truck via water supply authority Total budget: 8 mil. € 10 Dipotamia : Energy models - houses • Domestic buildings • Energy audit in each house, according to Greek Energy Efficiency Standards (KENAK) • Development of 9 energy models, for the simulation of the overall energy behavior. Building Area Windows Doors Glass Frame EE No Model Floors Heating system Overall material [m2] [m2] [m2] type type Actions Action Μ1 1 75 12 2 Single Wood Wood stove 4% 3% 1% Μ2 2 100 16 2 Double Metal Wood boiler 22% 18% 4% Stone Μ3 2 100 16 2 Double Metal Oil boiler 10% 8% 2% Μ4 2 100 16 2 Single Wood Wood stove 18% 15% 4% Concrete Μ5 2 100 16 2 Double Metal Wood stove 4% 3% 1% before Μ6 2 100 16 2 Double Metal Wood boiler 9% 7% 2% 1989 Μ7 2 100 16 2 Single Wood Oil boiler 8% 6% 1% Concrete Μ8 2 100 16 2 Double Metal Wood boiler 22% 18% 4% after 1989 Μ9 2 100 16 2 Single Metal Oil boiler 2% 2% 0% 100% 80% 20% 11 Dipotamia : Energy saving measures - houses • Energy saving measures include: 16,0 14,0 • Roof insulation 12,0 10,0 • Building’s envelope insulation 8,0 6,0 • Energy efficient windows 4,0 • Solar collectors for domestic hot water 2,0 0,0 Current primary Primary energy Primary energy • Energy savings: energy consumption after savings consumption E.E. measures Current primary energy Primary energy consumption Primary energy savings consumption after energy efficiency measures Annual energy Annual energy Annual energy Fuel Fuel Percent. consumption consumption consumption Heating MWh 14.111,5 Biomass / oil MWh 4.951,7 Biomass MWh 9.159,8 65% Cooling MWh 0,0 Electricity MWh 0,0 Electricity MWh 0,0 0% Hot water MWh 1.078,0 Electricity / oil MWh 583,6 Electricity MWh 494,4 46% Total MWh 15.189,5 MWh 5.535,3 MWh 9.654,2 64% 12 Dipotamia : Energy measures – CHP / DH • Renewable energy production unit: • 3,5 MWth biomass boiler for hot water production • 0,6 MWel Organic Rankine Cycle cogeneration unit • 7,5 km District Heating network philippopoulos energy technical s.a. 13 Dipotamia : Energy measures – CHP / DH 14 Central energy unit equilibrium Fuel 17.380 MWh 17.030 MWh 16.880 MWh 13.500 MWh 12.773 MWh (Biomass) (83%) (82%) (81%) (65%) (60%) District Heating 20.880 MWh 12.773 MWh (100%) (60%) Boiler Losses Exhaust and Cogeneration Electricity DH network 3500MWh ash losses losses production losses (17%) 350MWh 150MWh 3.380MWh 670MWh (2%) (1%) (16%) (5%) 15 Carbon equilibrium Current CO2e CO2e emissions CO2e emissions Balance Actions emissions saving compensation (tnCO2/a) (tnCO2/a) (tnCO2/a) (tnCO2/a) A Current CO2e emissions 3.333,00 B Energy Efficiency B.1 Domestic sector 907,1 B.2 Public buildings 37,1 B.3 Street lighting 89,3 B.4 Transportation 11 B.5 Water supply system 7,7 Total energy efficiency 1.052,20 C Compensation (RES) C.1 Small private PV 333,5 C.2 Cogeneration plant 2.719,80 Total compensation 3.053,30 D Total (tnCO2/a) 3.333,00 -772,50 3,20 /a 2 2,20 1,20 Carbon equilibrium 0,20 Thousands tnCO A B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 C.1 C.2 -0,80 16 Benefits Inhabitants Municipality • District Heating at very low • Green energy innovative price: 40,0€/MWh project for Greece • Higher thermal comfort after • Increased regional attention the interventions after dissemination actions • No need for individual fuel • Creation of 10 new working (wood) management positions • Reduced energy expenses • Population maintenance via smart electricity metering • Development of Public – network Private green initiatives • Potential for new local • Supporting local tourism business activities 17 Thank you www.aeiforiki.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESPON ESCAPE Final Report Annex 11
    ESCAPE European Shrinking Rural Areas: Challenges, Actions and Perspectives for Territorial Governance Applied Research Final Report – Annex 11 Case Study Kastoria, Western Macedonia, Greece Annex 11 This report is one of the deliverables of the ESCAPE project. This Applied ResearchProject is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Eleni Papadopoulou, Prof. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Engineering, School of Spatial Planning and Development (Greece) Christos Papalexiou, Dr, Agricultural Engineer - Rural Economist Elena Kalantzi, Spatial Planing and Development Engineer Afroditi Basiouka, MSc, Spatial Planing and Development Engineer, Municipality of Tzumerka, Epirus (Greece) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Benoit Esmanne, DG Agriculture and Rural Development (EU), Izabela Ziatek, Ministry of Economic Development (Poland), Jana Ilcikova, Ministry of Transport and Construction (Slovakia), Amalia Virdol, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (Romania) ESPON EGTC: Gavin Daly, Nicolas Rossignol,
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Condensed Financial Information 9M 2018
    Interim condensed financial information in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 for the period from 1 January to 30 September 2018 ELLAKTOR SA 25 ERMOU ST - 145 64 KIFISIA Tax Registration No: 094004914 ATHENS TAX OFFICE FOR SOCIÉTÉS ANONYMES Société Anonyme Registration No: 874/06/ Β/86/16 – File No: 100065 General Electronic Commercial Registry (G.E.MI.) Reg. No: 251501000 WorldReginfo - 7dccdc9a-53df-413f-9eee-24a07ff689e9 ELLAKTOR SA Interim condensed financial information in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 for the period from 1 January to 30 September 2018 All amounts are in thousand euros, except otherwise stated Contents of Interim Financial Report Statement of financial position ........................................................................................................ 3 Income statement for the nine-month period ending 30 September 2018 and 2017 .................. 5 Income statement Q3 2018 and 2017 .............................................................................................. 6 Statement of comprehensive income for the nine-month period ending 30 September 2018 and 2017 ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Statement of comprehensive income Q3 2018 and 2017 ............................................................... 8 Statement of changes in equity ........................................................................................................ 9 Cash flow
    [Show full text]
  • Visa & Residence Permit Guide for Students
    Ministry of Interior & Administrative Reconstruction Ministry of Foreign Affairs Directorate General for Citizenship & C GEN. DIRECTORATE FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS Immigration Policy C4 Directorate Justice, Home Affairs & Directorate for Immigration Policy Schengen Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.ypes.gr www.mfa.gr Visa & Residence Permit guide for students 1 Index 1. EU/EEA Nationals 2. Non EU/EEA Nationals 2.a Mobility of Non EU/EEA Students - Moving between EU countries during my short-term visit – less than three months - Moving between EU countries during my long-term stay – more than three months 2.b Short courses in Greek Universities, not exceeding three months. 2.c Admission for studies in Greek Universities or for participation in exchange programs, under bilateral agreements or in projects funded by the European Union i.e “ERASMUS + (placement)” program for long-term stay (more than three months). - Studies in Greek universities (undergraduate, master and doctoral level - Participation in exchange programs, under interstate agreements, in cooperation projects funded by the European Union including «ERASMUS+ placement program» 3. Refusal of a National Visa (type D)/Rights of the applicant. 4. Right to appeal against the decision of the Consular Authority 5. Annex I - Application form for National Visa (sample) Annex II - Application form for Residence Permit Annex III - Refusal Form Annex IV - Photo specifications for a national visa application Annex V - Aliens and Immigration Departments Contacts 2 1. Students EU/EEA Nationals You will not require a visa for studies to enter Greece if you possess a valid passport from an EU Member State, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • The 7 Most Endangered 2014
    The 7 Most Endangered 2014 Programme run by Europa Nostra, the Voice of Cultural Heritage in Europe, in partnership with Council of Europe Development Bank (associated partner) and European Investment Bank Institute (founding partner) RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION OF KASTORIA’S DOLCHO AND APOZARI NEIGHBOURHOODS KASTORIA, GREECE Feasibility Study funded by a grant from Council of Europe Development Bank through its Spanish Social Cohesion Account Pedro Ponce de León. APRIL 2015 Disclaimer: The views expressed by this report are exclusively the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CEB. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION; PURPOSE AND LOCATION. 3 2. CONTEXT. ENVIRONMENT. TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS. DESCRIPTION OF BOTH NEIGHBORHOODS. 5 3. S.W.O.T. ANALYSIS. 11 4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO GET PERMISSIONS FOR LISTED BUILDINGS 17 5. PROPOSALS. 22 5.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS 5.2. LEGAL AND REGULATORY TASKS. GOVERNMENT TRANSVERSALITY 5.3. INCENTIVE PROGRAMMES o PRIVATE SECTOR o PUBLIC SECTOR o PUBLIC & PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS o CHURCH 5.4. URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT 5.5. ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT IN LISTED BUILDINGS 6. PILOT PROGRAMME. 28 6.1. DOLCHO o DESCRIPTION o QUANTIFICATION 6.2. APOZARI o DESCRIPTION o QUANTIFICATION 7. ESTIMATED INVESTMENT COSTS AND PLANNING. 33 8. FINANCING POSSIBILITIES. 38 8.1. OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS O&M 8.2. PUBLIC FUNDING SOURCES 8.3. PRIVATE FUNDING SOURCES 8.4. DATABASE 9. CONCLUSIONS. 50 DRAWINGS AND 3D IMAGES1. (List) 61 APPENDIX 1. REFERENCES AND DOCUMENTS USED. 62 APPENDIX 2. MISSION DETAILS. AGENDA. 63 1 This section consists of 16 general plans and 3 specific drawings, which are inseparable part of this Final Report, but due to its size and format are in separate files 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Management Flowchart in Regional Unit of Kastoria
    st 1 International Conference on Environmental Design (ICED2020) 24‐25 October 2020, Athens, Greece WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT FLOWCHART IN REGIONAL UNIT OF KASTORIA N. Kontinis1, A. Psilovikos1, D. Malamataris1,2,*, A. Spiridis2, V. Koutalou2 1Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, Fytoko Street, 38446, N. Ionia Magnisias, Greece 2HYETOS S.A. Consulting Company, Ippodromiou Sq. 7, 54622, Thessaloniki, Greece ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The continuously increasing rate of freshwater demand, along with the limited availability of water resources which is further deteriorated due to climate change, have exacerbated the conflicts among competing water users in shared water systems in Greece. The current study investigates the water resources availability of the Regional Unit of Kastoria in Western Macedonia aiming at equitable use of surface water resources. Water systems are usually complex systems since they include all means of water supply, water demand and water regulation. The efficient investigation of the water resources of the Regional Unit of Kastoria, was based on an integrated hydrological model that was developed in the framework of the current study for the main land – surface water cycle components simulation of the whole study area. At first, the study area was divided into six catchments which were further divided into eleven sub‐catchments. The inputs of the hydrological model are the household, agricultural and industrial water volumes as well as the precipitation while the output of the model is the runoff of each catchment. The hydrological model was visualized by a comprehensive flowchart representing all the water system’s components. The quantitative estimation of the main hydrological cycle components and the simulation of the precipitation – water demand – water conflicts interrelation form the basis of sustainable water management strategies development.
    [Show full text]
  • 888739.En Pe 480.379
    Question for written answer E-000198/2012 to the Commission Rule 117 Michail Tremopoulos (Verts/ALE) Subject: New dam on the River Aliakmonas in Nestorio, Kastoria According to the Minister for Rural Development, a dam 75 metres high cofinanced by the EU is to be built on the River Aliakmonas in the region of Nestorio, Kastoria.1 The project will create a reservoir of 823 000 square metres, which will flood a gorge with important geological formations and fauna and thousands of hectares of productive forest containing clusters of priority habitats234. Consequently, this particular intervention is thematically and financially at odds with the current LIFE09NAT/GR/00333 project relating to the species ursus arctos and previous LIFE projects. Moreover, the reservoir will adversely affect the quality of the water and it may have an adverse effect on the climate in the area, increase the risk of earthquake and speeding up erosion of the banks5. Finally, it is likely to reverse the direction of decades of ecotourism-oriented development in favour of intensive irrigated maize and alfalfa crops which may or may not generate a profit. The environmental impact assessment used to obtain permission for the project did not consider any alternative solutions, either in terms of irrigation or in terms of electricity production, nor has the impact of dozens of other artificial works along the Aliakmonas River system been taken into consideration678. It should also be noted that, so far, no preliminary basin management plan has been drawn up for section 09 (Western Macedonia), as required of Greece under Directive 2000/60/EC9 Will the Commission say: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Integrated Waste Management System of Western
    The Regional Integrated Waste Management System of Western Macedonia Periklis Kafasis Director of Supplies-Services- Programmes Naxos, 13-06-2018 Responsible Body for Waste Management (DIADYMA S.A.) DIADYMA SA was founded in 1998, with the participation of 61 "Capodistrian" Municipalities & Communities - being one of the largest inter-municipal partnerships at country level. Shareholders (today after the new “Kallikratis” administrative structure): The 12 Municipalities of the Region of Western Macedonia - Aminteon, Voio, Grevena, Deskati, Eordea, Kastoria, Kozani, Nestorio, Orestida, Prespa, Serbia-Velvento & Florina The main objective of the Company since its establishment was the design, implementation and operation of the Integrated Waste Management Plan in Western Macedonia Region, through the application of sustainable management methods, in order to achieve the objectives of the National and European legislation on waste management, with the lowest cost to the citizen. IWMS Facilities The IWMS has been in operation since July 2005 and consists of: • The Integrated Waste Management Central Florina Facilities(IWMCF) where the Municipal Solid Aminteo Waste is processed and finally disposed of Ptolemaida • The 10 Local Waste Management Units, where Kastoria the mixed waste, recyclable materials, bulky, ΚΕΟΔ electrical and electronic waste, green and other separately collected waste streams are initially Voio Kozani registered and transferred and then through Siatista LWMU are transhipped and transported to the Servia IWMCF. Grevena
    [Show full text]
  • Less Waste II Project
    The Regional Integrated Waste Management System of Western Macedonia and the Less Waste II Project Periklis Kafasis Director of Supplies-Services- Programmes Sensitization Event Thessaloniki, 10-12-2018 Responsible Body for Waste Management (DIADYMA S.A.) ❑DIADYMA SA was founded in 1998, with the participation of 61 "Capodistrian" Municipalities & Communities - being one of the largest inter-municipal partnerships at country level. ❑ Shareholders (today after the new “Kallikratis” administrative structure): The 12 Municipalities of the Region of Western Macedonia - Aminteon, Voio, Grevena, Deskati, Eordea, Kastoria, Kozani, Nestorio, Orestida, Prespa, Serbia-Velvento & Florina ❑ The main objective of the Company since its establishment was the design, implementation and operation of the Integrated Waste Management Plan in Western Macedonia Region, through the application of sustainable management methods, in order to achieve the objectives of the National and European legislation on waste management, with the lowest cost to the citizen. IWMS Facilities The IWMS has been in operation since July 2005 and consists of: • The Integrated Waste Management Central Facilities(IWMCF) where the Florina Municipal Solid Waste is processed Aminteo and finally disposed of Ptolemaida • The 10 Local Waste Management Kastoria Units, where the mixed waste, ΚΕΟΔ recyclable materials, bulky, electrical Voio Kozani and electronic waste, green and other Siatista separately collected waste streams are Servia initially registered and transferred and Grevena then
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap for the Transition of the Western Macedonia Region to a Post-Lignite Era
    ECONOMIC & TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT JULY 2016 ROADMAP FOR THE TRANSITION OF THE WESTERN MACEDONIA REGION TO A POST-LIGNITE ERA ROADMAP FOR THE TRANSITION OF THE WESTERN MACEDONIA REGION TO A POST-LIGNITE ERA Prepared by: Antonis Rovolis, Associate Professor, Panteion University of Athens, Department of Economic and Regional Development Panagiotis Kalimeris, Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources (IUEHR), Panteion University of Athens, International Hellenic University, School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies Editing: Michalis Prodromou and Nikos Mantzaris, WWF Greece http://www.youtube.com/wwfgrwebtv http://www.facebook.com/WWFGreece http://twitter.com/WWF_Greece Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1. AIM OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 7 2. LIGNITE IN THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE ............................................................................. 9 2.1. What is lignite? .................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. The role of lignite in today's energy model ..................................................................... 11 3. THE WESTERN MACEDONIA REGION ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated ESIA Greece Annex 4.4 - West - Administrative Structures LEGEND PIPELINE ROUTE
    Integrated ESIA Greece Annex 4.4 - West - Administrative Structures LEGEND PIPELINE ROUTE GREECE (WEST) GREECE (EAST) ALBANIA STUDY AREA 2 km CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES NATIONAL REGIONAL MUNICIPAL MUNICIPALITIES TRAVERSED BY PIPELINE ROUTE 0 5 10 km Sheet KP From to 1 353+000 543+160 BASE CASE ROUTE ORDERING COMPANY DOCUMENT TITLE Integrated ESIA Greece TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE Annex 4.4 - West - Administrative Structures PROJECT TITLE Scale: 1:10,000 Sheet 0 of 1 Company Representative Turid Thormodsen Document-No. Rev. 3 TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE C201 A 02 2013-06-04 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ERM ENT ENT Company Reference E Z GPL00 - ERM - 642 - Y - TAE - 0015 / at04 02 I ACCEPTED ORIGINATOR 01 2013-03-15 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ERM ENT ENT 2012-08-23 S ON L Originating System- Document Sequenz At A REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED DATE ACCEPTED Location Company code Discipline Type Number Number Revision N Engineer Representative Heinz Josef Joemann I G ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT I ENT - PROJECT NO. GIS - FILE NO. Size R EON - New Build & Technology Trans Adriatic Pipeline NO. 2101.C11111.231.52.02 Annex4.4_Legend.mxd O Document Originator Simone Poli A3 500000 270000 550000 300000 330000 600000 360000 390000 650000 KILKIS Municipal Boundaries before 01/01/2011 CHALKIDONA SKYDRA EDESSA 370 410 PELLA 360 C 400 390 PRESPES 430 420 FLORINA E 380 440 AMYNTAIO N 450 T R A NAOUSA A 460 L ALEXANDRIA I DELTA 0 M A C N 0 0 M 0 0 O 0 5 E A C E D 5 9 9 4 T 4 4 D 4 543,16 S O E KASTORIA 470 540 490 480 N 500 W I EORDEA VERIA 530 A 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Emigration from Macedonia
    XIV. Emigration From Macedonia by Christos Mandatzis A crossroads, a hub, a meeting-point, a place of confluence and commerce and co- existence of the Balkan peoples over the centuries, Macedonia has always been one of the most dynamic regions in this corner of the world, a place in which many of the so- cial and economic activities of neighbouring nations developed and flourished. A battlefield and an apple of discord, sought after by all its neighbours through military and diplomatic means, it was also a region of major population movements, permanent or casual, from the countries upon which it bordered. The pages that follow illuminate aspects of this emigrational phenomenon in Ma- cedonia, primarily from the end of the 19th to the latter part of the 20th century. The economic, political and social causes that sparked this emigration and determined its pattern on each occasion, which are directly related to the history of the region and are analysed in detail elsewhere, will be touched on only very briefly. This study focuses primarily on the movements of emigrants from Macedonia to foreign countries, usually in search of better prospects for themselves and their families. We are not concerned here with other mass movements of population (either voluntary relocation or deportation), like those that followed political developments or border changes in the Balkans in the 20th century and were usually consequent upon armed conflict and bi- or multi-lateral agreements such as, for example, the more than seven- teen population shifts (essentially movements of refugees) that took place in Macedonia between 1912 and 1924 or the departure of some 56,000 persons to the countries of the then Eastern Bloc after the end of the Greek Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Reroutings & Changes in Permanent and Temporary Installations
    Third Amendment to the ESIA Greece - Small reroutings & changes in Permanent and Temporary Installations Annex 1 – Decision on Approval of Environmental Terms HELLENIC REPUBLIC Athens, 12 September 2014 MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE DG FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Ref. No. οικ. 174848 ΕΥPΕ (SPECIAL ENVIRONMENT SERVICE) Section I Address: 11 Alexandras Ave. PC: 114 73 Contact: K. Yiavis TO: TAP AG - Greece Tel.: 210.6417962 st Fax: 210.6451914 21 Floor, Pyrgos Athinon 2-4 Mesoyeion Ave., 115 27 Athens (attached: EIA & supplementary file) Cc.: List of Recipients DECISION Subject: Approval of environmental terms for construction and operation of the project: “Trans Adriatic High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipeline (ΤΑΡ) & Accompanying Installations – Greek Section”. THE MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Having regard to: 1. Law 4014/2011 “Environmental licensing of projects and activities, regulation of unauthorized constructions, in combination with the creation of an environmental balance and other provisions within the competence of the Ministry of the Environment” (Gov. Gaz. Α' 209), as amended and currently in force. 2. Law 3028/2002 “On protection of antiquities and of the cultural heritage in general” (Gov. Gaz. Α' 153), as amended and currently in force. 3. Law 2289/1995 (Gov. Gaz. Α' 27) regulating matters relating to the construction of the natural gas pipeline. 4. Law 4217/2013 (Gov. Gaz. Α' 267) ratifying the Host Government Agreement between the Hellenic Republic and TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE AG. 5. Regulation (EC) 347/2013 of the European Parliament. 6. Law 4145/2013 (Gov. Gaz. Α' 89) “Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Albania, the Hellenic Republic and the Italian Republic concerning the TAP Natural Gas Pipeline”.
    [Show full text]