Executive Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mahmoud Abbas's Address to the UN Security Council: Rhetoric Versus
רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ( למ מ" ) רמה כרמ כ ז ז מל מה ו י תשר עד מל מה ו ד ו י ד ע י י ע ן י ן ו ל ( רט למ ו מ" ר ) כרמ ז מה י עד מל ו ד י ע י ן ול רט ו ר Mahmoud Abbas’s address to the UN Security Council: Rhetoric versus reality February 17, 2020 Overview On February 11, 2020, Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas delivered an address before the UN Security Council as part of the PA’s diplomatic campaign against the Trump plan1. Mahmoud Abbas’s address was softened and aimed mainly at Western ears: he avoided threatening to harm relations with Israel or dismantle the PA (threats that he and senior officials in the PA have made on several occasions). He presented a façade that Palestinians were striving for a “just peace” based on a two-state solution within the 1967 borders, in non-violent ways. Mahmoud Abbas completely rejected the Trump plan (“the US-Israeli deal”), stressing that the Palestinians would not accept the plan. However, he noted that he was ready to negotiate with Israel, with international mediation or even without intermediaries, based on a two-state solution within the 1967 borders. Right: UN Security Council session. Left: Mahmoud Abbas speaking before the UN Security Council (Mahmoud Abbas’s Facebook page, February 11, 2020) 1 As part of the diplomatic campaign against the Trump plan, the Palestinians requested an emergency session of the UN Security Council. -
Agenda Item 7
AGENDA ITEM 7 COUNTRY CLAIMS & UN WATCH RESPONSES About UN Watch Founded in 1993, UN Watch is a non-governmental organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, that monitors the United Nations by the yardstick of its charter and protects human rights worldwide. For more information, please visit our website: www.unwatch.org. About the Cover Human Rights Council - Special Meeting, 28 October 2015. UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré via UN Geneva Flickr, www.flickr.com/photos/unisgeneva Acknowledgments Dina Rovner, the Legal Advisor of UN Watch, was the chief researcher and writer of this report. Simon Plosker, Managing Editor of UN Watch, contributed several sections. The editor was Executive Director Hillel Neuer. The project was made possible thanks to the unwavering determination and generous support of a special friend of UN Watch. Copyright © 2021 United Nations Watch. All rights reserved. AGENDA ITEM 7: COUNTRY CLAIMS & UN WATCH RESPONSES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Claim 1: “Israel has occupied Palestinian territory for 70 years” ......................................3 Claim 2: “Israel is responsible for the impasse in peace talks” ...........................................4 Claim 3: “Israel commits apartheid against the Palestinians” ..........................................6 Claim 4: “Israel commits ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians” ...............................8 Claim 5: “Palestinian refugees -
Mixed Messages
MIXED MESSAGES ABBAS and palestinians on isRael 2014–16 David Pollock David Pollock MIXED MESSAGES ABBAS and palestinians on isRael 2014–16 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY WWW.WASHINGTONINSTITUTE.ORG The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. Policy Focus 144, April 2016 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2016 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1111 19th Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Design: 1000colors Photo: Mahmoud Abbas, February 2016 (REUTERS/Franck Robichon/Pool) CONTENTS Acknowledgments | v Introduction | vii 1: Themes in PA Messaging | 1 2: PA Messaging: Chronology | 23 3: PA Messaging and Palestinian Public Opinion, 2014–15 | 43 4: Policy Implications | 65 Notes | 71 About the Author | 82 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGS. 1–7: Internet Examples of Mixed Messaging | vi FIG. 8: Poll Response on Palestinian National Goal | 51 FIG. 9: Poll Response on Maintaining a Ceasefire | 53 FIG. 10: Poll Response on Top Priorities | 57 FIG. 11: Poll Response on Negotiating a Two-State Solution | 59 FIG. 12: Poll Response on Palestinian Ability to Work in Israel | 60 FIG. 13: Poll Response on “Two States for Two Peoples” | 63 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude for outstanding research sup- port from a great team of young scholars, in particular Catherine Cleve- land, Gavi Barnhard, and Adam Rasgon. -
Palestinian Education—Teaching Peace Or War?
S. HRG. 108–290 PALESTINIAN EDUCATION—TEACHING PEACE OR WAR? HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SPECIAL HEARING OCTOBER 30, 2003—WASHINGTON, DC Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 90–712 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JAMES W. MORHARD, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi TOM HARKIN, Iowa JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ERNEST F. -
Reframing Sacred Values by Scott Atran and Robert Axelrod Forthcoming in Negotiation Journal, July 2008
1 Reframing Sacred Values By Scott Atran and Robert Axelrod Forthcoming in Negotiation Journal, July 2008 Copyright by 2008 The President and Fellows of Harvard College Scott Atran is Research Director, Anthropology, CNRS – Institut Jean Nicod, Paris; Presidential Scholar, Sociology, John Jay College of the City University of New York; Visting Professor of Psychology and Public Policy, University of Michigan. His e-mail address is [email protected]. Robert Axelrod isWalgreen Professor for the Study of Human Understanding, Department of Political Science and Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan. His e-mail address is [email protected]. Abstract Sacred values differ from material or instrumental values in that they incorporate moral beliefs that drive action in ways dissociated from prospects for success. Across the world, people believe that devotion to essential or core values – such as the welfare of their family and country, or their commitment to religion, honor, and justice – are, or ought to be, absolute and inviolable. Counterintuitively, understanding an opponent’s sacred values, we believe, offers surprising opportunities for breakthroughs to peace. Because of the emotional unwillingness of those in conflict situations to negotiate sacred values, conventional wisdom suggests that negotiators should either leave sacred values for last in political negotiations or try to bypass them with sufficient material incentives. Our empirical findings and historical analysis suggest that conventional wisdom is wrong. In fact, offering to provide material benefits in exchange for giving up a sacred value actually makes settlement more difficult because people see the offering as an insult rather than a compromise. But we also found that making symbolic concessions of no apparent material benefit might open the way to resolving seemingly irresolvable conflicts. -
Education and Chronic Crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Fragmented foundations: education and chronic crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory by Susan Nicolai UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning Save the Children UK Fragmented foundations: education and chronic crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory The choice and the presentation of the facts contained in this book and the opinions expressed therein are not necessarily those of IIEP-UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Save the Children, unless otherwise stated. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IIEP-UNESCO and Save the Children concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published jointly by: International Institute for Educational Planning 7-9 rue Eugène Delacroix, 75116 Paris e-mail: [email protected] IIEP web site: www.unesco.org/iiep and Save the Children UK, Save the Children, 1 St. John’s Lane, London, EC1M 4AR Cover design: Corinne Hayworth Cover photo: Made available by the Ministry of Education and Higher Education, Palestinian Curriculum Development Center Typesetting: Linéale Production ISBN: 978-92-803-1301-7 © IIEP-UNESCO 2007 Acknowledgements Thanks go, first and foremost, to the staff in the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) Ministry of Education and Higher Education (MoEHE) in early 2005. The Director-General of International and Public Relations, Basri Saleh, provided valuable background and insight to shape this study. -
Palestinian Textbooks Portray Jews Badly
Report: Palestinian textbooks portray Jews badly By DIAA HADID – June 4, 2008 JERUSALEM (AP) — Authors of Palestinian school textbooks took small steps toward softening their portrayal of Israel under the rule of moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas — but progress was quickly reversed after the militant Islamic Hamas took over, according to a report released on Tuesday. The report by the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education and by the American Jewish Committee looked at 120 textbooks published from 2000 to 2006. The report reflects charges by Israelis that Palestinian textbooks are not in keeping with a peace process that started in 1993. Palestinians counter that Jewish Israeli students are not taught about Palestinian suffering. Arnon Groiss, author of the report, said most of the textbooks from grade one to 10, issued under the late Yasser Arafat's rule, don't acknowledge any historical Jewish presence in ancient Palestine. But in 11th grade books issued under the moderate Abbas, there are two maps showing Israel within the "Green Line" — the cease-fire line before the 1967 war, when Israel captured east Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The textbooks issued under Abbas' rule also include a discussion of Jewish history in the region, the report said. However, in 2006, the militant Islamic Hamas won an election and issued a 12th grade textbook that dramatically reversed those steps, the report said. Mixed with anti-Semitic sentiments in the textbooks are genuine Palestinian complaints against Israel, including settlement building in areas Palestinians want for their future state, and the Israeli separation barrier, which swallows swathes of West Bank land. -
Int Cerd Ngo Pse 35518 E
Alternative Report of United Nations Watch to the 99th Session of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination for its review of State of Palestine Submitted By: Hillel Neuer and Dina Rovner United Nations Watch Case Postale 191 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 734 1472 [email protected] 12 July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 JURISDICTION .............................................................................................................................3 PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY AND HAMAS VIOLATIONS OF ICERD .................................4 I. RACIAL SEGREGATION AND APARTHEID (Article 3) ........................................4 A. Palestinian Charters Reject Israel’s Right to Exist .................................................4 1. PLO and Fatah Charters ....................................................................................4 2. Hamas Charter ..................................................................................................5 B. Palestinian Authority law prohibits land sales to Jewish Israelis ...........................6 C. Palestinian Authority law promotes and rewards terrorism against Jewish Israelis ..................................................................................................................................7