CAN UNCLASSIFIED
Foundations for a multistatic synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging capability
Development of a C‑Band prototype receiver and processor
Ryan A. English Christoph H. Gierull DRDC – Ottawa Research Centre
The body of this CAN UNCLASSIFIED document does not contain the required security banners according to DND security standards. However, it must be treated as CAN UNCLASSIFIED and protected appropriately based on the terms and conditions specified on the covering page.
Defence Research and Development Canada Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 February 2021
CAN UNCLASSIFIED
CAN UNCLASSIFIED
IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS
This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act.
Disclaimer: This publication was prepared by Defence Research and Development Canada an agency of the Department of National Defence. The information contained in this publication has been derived and determined through best practice and adherence to the highest standards of responsible conduct of scientific research. This information is intended for the use of the Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces (“Canada”) and Public Safety partners and, as permitted, may be shared with academia, industry, Canada’s allies, and the public (“Third Parties”). Any use by, or any reliance on or decisions made based on this publication by Third Parties, are done at their own risk and responsibility. Canada does not assume any liability for any damages or losses which may arise from any use of, or reliance on, the publication.
Endorsement statement: This publication has been peer-reviewed and published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Inquiries can be sent to: [email protected].
Template in use: EO Publishing App for SR-RD-EC Eng 2018-12-19_v1 (new disclaimer).dotm
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence), 2021 © Sa Majesté la Reine en droit du Canada (Ministère de la Défense nationale), 2021
CAN UNCLASSIFIED
Abstract
DRDC has developed a new R&D ground-based C-band bistatic SAR receiver system and collected fifteen bistatic data sets using RADARSAT-2 as the illuminator. The collections were made on a non-interference basis from existing acquisitions appearing in the Government of Canada’s monthly Enhanced Management of Orders and Conflicts plans. In addition to rooftop deployment of the receiver antennas, aerial boom lifts were used to experiment with more flexible deployment options. Several different bistatic angles were acquired during the campaign.
Analysis of the direct path received signal from the satellite at each receiver site was performed to extract relevant parameter values. The results were applied to range compression and back projection of the signal reflected from the scene to the receiver site, yielding good quality SAR imagery in all fifteen cases. Basic phenomenology of these bistatic scenes are under study, and the system is validated and baselined for expanding DRDC’s research into fully multistatic SAR imagery, polarimetric and interferometric bistatic phenomenology, and the opportunity to use other illuminators.
Significance to defence and security
DRDC has successfully validated and baselined an R&D ground-based bistatic SAR capability for C-band illuminators, allowing for the generation of near real-time SAR imagery at the receiver site independent of the space-based sensor system providing the illumination. Phenomenology specific to bistatic SAR imagery is under study and may be used on its own, or in combination with the traditional monostatic SAR imagery, to expand the imagery intelligence available about the scene contents.
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 i
Résumé
RDDC a développé un nouveau système R et D de récepteur au sol de radar à synthèse d’ouverture (SAR) bistatique en bande C et a recueilli quinze ensembles de données bistatiques en utilisant RADARSAT-2 comme illuminateur. Les collectes ont été réalisées sans interférence à partir des acquisitions de données actuelles répertoriées dans les plans mensuels de gestion améliorée des commandes et des conflits du gouvernement du Canada. En plus du déploiement sur toiture des antennes du récepteur, des élévateurs à nacelle ont servi à explorer diverses options de déploiement plus souples. Divers angles bistatiques ont été acquis dans le cadre de la campagne.
De plus, une analyse du signal du satellite reçu en trajet direct a été réalisée à chaque emplacement de récepteur pour en extraire les valeurs des paramètres pertinents. Les résultats ont été appliqués à la compression en portée et à la projection par transparence du signal réfléchi de la scène vers l’emplacement du récepteur, ce qui a produit des images SAR de bonne qualité dans les quinze cas. Par ailleurs, la phénoménologie de base des scènes bistatiques est à l’étude, et le système a été validé et établi comme base de référence pour étendre la recherche de RDDC à une phénoménologie bistatique polarimétrique et interférométrique de l’imagerie SAR entièrement multistatique, et créer une occasion d’utiliser d’autres illuminateurs.
Importance pour la défense et la sécurité
RDDC est parvenu à valider et à établir comme base de référence une capacité R & D au sol de SAR bistatique pour des illuminateurs en bande C et permette ainsi de générer des images SAR en temps quasi réel à l’emplacement du récepteur, indépendamment du système de capteur spatial qui produit l’illumination. La phénoménologie propre à l’imagerie SAR bistatique est à l’étude et peut être utilisée seule ou combinée à l’imagerie SAR monostatique traditionnelle pour accroître le renseignement par imagerie disponible au sujet des contenus de scènes.
ii DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021
Table of contents
Abstract ...... i Significance to defence and security ...... i Résumé ...... ii Importance pour la défense et la sécurité ...... ii Table of contents ...... iii List of figures ...... v List of tables ...... vii Acknowledgements ...... viii 1 Introduction ...... 1 2 The bistatic SAR paradigm ...... 3 2.1 Bistatic geometry ...... 3 2.2 Frames of reference ...... 3 2.3 Signal detection ...... 6 3 The prototype C-band receiver ...... 8 4 Bistatic image processing ...... 11 4.1 Direct path analysis ...... 11 4.1.1 Maximizing the direct path SNR ...... 12 4.1.2 Steps for direct path analysis ...... 12 4.1.3 Illumination period extents ...... 15 4.2 Reflected data processing ...... 16 4.2.1 Range-Doppler image ...... 16 4.2.2 Aligning the distance profile ...... 17 4.3 Image formation ...... 19 5 Field trials ...... 21 5.1 The RADARSAT-2 illumination source ...... 21 5.2 The experimental ground-based receiver system ...... 22 5.3 Field trial: DFL rooftop 2 ...... 22 5.4 Field trial: CRC boom lift ...... 23 5.5 Field trial: Carling Campus ...... 24 5.6 Field trial: 125’ boom lift ...... 26 5.7 Bistatic Active Radar Calibrator ...... 28 6 Analysis of collected data ...... 29 6.1 Direct path analysis ...... 29 6.2 Range resolution ...... 31 6.3 Azimuth resolution ...... 33 6.4 Bistatic imagery analysis ...... 35
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 iii
7 Conclusion ...... 38 References ...... 39 Annex A Step function detector ...... 41 A.1 Demarcation function ...... 41 A.2 Demarcation example...... 42 List of symbols/abbreviations/acronyms/initialisms ...... 44
iv DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021
List of figures
Figure 1: Bistatic geometry with moving Tx and elevated stationary Rx...... 3 Figure 2: Comparison between ECI (a–c) and ECEF (d–f) frames of reference for ground tracks of three consecutive RS-2 orbits. The ECI orbits (red) are a closed loop with the Earth’s surface moving eastward beneath it. In the ECEF reference, the orbits (blue) precess westward while the Earth’s surface remains fixed beneath it. Context imagery is the Blue Marble: Land Surface, Shallow Water, and Shaded Topography dataset from NASA’s Earth Observatory [18]...... 5 Figure 3: Comparison of an RS-2 orbit track in the ECI (red) and ECEF (blue) coordinate systems with the coordinate axes momentarily aligned near Ottawa, Canada. Context is provided using Landsat imagery from NOAA and distributed by the Google Image WMS Service. 6 Figure 4: Magnitude of sampled direct path receiver data (blue) with pulses present. The demarcation function (red) shows negative slope in the noise only regions and positive slope where signal is present...... 7 Figure 5: Receiver antennas for the DRDC bistatic prototype receiver system. The reflected signal from the ground is received via the fan antenna (a), while the direct path signal is obtained via a horn antenna (b)...... 8 Figure 6: Block diagram of clock components for the ground-based DRDC prototype bistatic SAR receiver hardware, showing dual local oscillators...... 9 Figure 7: Block diagram of ground-based DRDC prototype bistatic SAR receiver hardware components attached to the receiver antennas showing synchronized two channel processing...... 9 Figure 8: Block diagram of ground-based DRDC prototype bistatic SAR receiver hardware attached to the digitizer and storage showing synchronized two channel processing...... 10 Figure 9: Positive frequency spectrum (green) corresponding to direct path data fragment of 28.6 ms. The demarcation function (red, not to scale) contributes to the extraction of the spectrum edges to create a band pass filter (blue)...... 13 Figure 10: Samples from a series of direct path pulses around the signal region in (a) baseband and (b) after range compression...... 14 Figure 11: Magnitude in dB (blue), unwrapped phase (red, not to scale), and zero Doppler adjusted phase (green, not to scale) of range compressed direct path peaks. Inclusion of the pulses with magnitude above -3 dB are preferred, while those beyond a single phase cycle yield no computational benefit for this direct path analysis...... 15 Figure 12: (a) Range curvature for the pulse peak locations of the range compressed direct path data. (b) The black curve is the quadratic model of the range curvature. (c) The direct path range compressed data corrected for range curvature. (d) The reflected data from the main lobe pulses with Range and Azimuth compression. Data is from the 08 November 2015 bistatic collection...... 17
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 v
Figure 13: Quadratic range profile (blue) and scaled phase history (red) over central pulses of the main lobe for 02 March 2015 bistatic data collection...... 19 Figure 14: Backprojection processing for a pulse transmitted 2.5 km past broadside: (a) total path distance for pixels in a backprojection grid with 5m pixel spacing; (b) estimated main lobe illumination centred on white line (x = 2535 m) and terminating at the black line (x = -3295 m); and (c) distribution of response (in dB) from a single reflected pulse across the masked backprojection grid...... 20 Figure 15: Shirleys Bay Campus showing the location of the DFL rooftop deployments. The CRC and 125’ boom lifts are adjacent to DRDC’s T-86 building...... 23 Figure 16: Genie Z-45/25 RT articulating boom lift...... 24 Figure 17: Line-of-sight to the Carling Campus Building 5 tower...... 25 Figure 18: Genie S-125 telescopic boom lift...... 27 Figure 19: Forward-scattering bistatic VV imagery of 2015-10-05 having 20 incidence angle and 175 bistatic angle. (a) Response from a single pulse is distributed along iso-range ellipses. Iso-Doppler lines are vertical, intersecting the iso-range curves on either side of the mirror lines (white). (b) Scatterers above the mirror lines are real, those below are mirrored ambiguities...... 36 Figure 20: Side-looking bistatic HH imagery of 2015-10-16 with 48 incidence angle and 61.5 bistatic angle. Non-overlapping intervals of pulses used as a time series showing illumination moving from left to right. The mirror line is shown in white...... 37 Figure A.1: Magnitude of pulse interval (blue) showing signal region to the left and noise only region to the right of the demarcation point. The central tendacies of these regions are modelled by a discrete Heaviside function (red). The mean value (black) of the pulse interval along with the data itself is used to generate the demarcation function (green)...... 43
vi DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021
List of tables
Table 1: Deployment parameters for the Multistatic SAR field trial: DFL rooftop 2 acquisitions. 23 Table 2: Deployment parameters for the Multistatic SAR field trial: CRC boom lift acquisitions. 24 Table 3: Deployment parameters for the Multistatic SAR field trial: Carling Campus acquisitions.25 Table 4: Antenna positions for the Multistatic SAR field trial: Carling Campus acquisitions. . 26 Table 5: Deployment parameters for the Multistatic SAR field trial: 125’ boom lift...... 26 Table 6: Deployment parameters for the Bistatic Active Radar Calibrator...... 28 Table 7: Measured characteristic parameters of bistatic SAR data...... 29 Table 8: Measured characteristic parameters of bistatic SAR data...... 30 Table 9: Measured characteristic parameters of bistatic SAR data...... 30 Table 10: Range resolution in the slant plane down range of the receiver antenna, compared with the nominal impulse response width of the monostatic slant range image product given in [23]...... 32 Table 11: Nominal cross-range resolution for DFL rooftop and CRC boom lift collections. .. 33 Table 12: Nominal cross-range and BARC azimuth resolution derived from BARC measurement for Carling Campus and 125’ Boom Lift collections. The UltraFine, Wide MultiFine, and Spotlight modes are not subject to Equation (7)...... 34
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 vii
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their appreciation to the David Florida Laboratory and Jean-Pierre Charron for accommodating the deployment of the DRDC equipment on their site, and the Communications Research Centre Canada and Jerry Achtereekte for support and assistance in the deployment and use of the aerial lift platforms. The support received from personnel with the Vice Chief of Defence Staff, Public Services and Procurement Canada, and Brookfield Johnson Controls was essential to the success of the field trials conducted at the Carling Campus.
Extensive technical support for design and development of the receiver system hardware and for conducting the field trials was provided by Tony Laneve, Norm Reed, Pietro Reitano, and Heather Frampton of the Radar Technology and Engineering Group. Janice Lang of the Communcations Group provided photographic support.
Additional thanks to the Radar Electronic Warfare Section for the loan of equipment and their custom software to access the corresponding results. RAE expresses his appreciation to Chuck Livingstone for many useful conversations regarding the underlying operations of the RADARSAT-2 sensor.
viii DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021
1 Introduction
Under the Technology Investment Fund (TIF), Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) had embarked on a project to study the feasibility of bistatic SAR employing extremely large synthetic apertures times in which the transmitter and receiver do not communicate [1], [2]. The capability consisted of single stationary ground-based receivers deployed to capture the illumination of moving SAR transmitters, on both airborne and space-based radar (SBR) platforms, operating in either the C-band or X-band spectrum.
The work included collaboration with the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) under the auspices of the Trilateral Technical Research and Development Program (TTRDP), since rebranded the Technical Research and Development Program (TRDP). New collaborative bistatic work using RADARSAT-2 (RS-2) as the illuminator for AFRL’s Transportable Radar Receiver (TRR) occurred in late 2012. The TRR is a 12-channel phased array antenna, with a 13th channel for the direct path receiver, leading to new capabilities, such as beam-forming, that could be accomplished with the multi-channel data.
The turn of the millennium saw the resurrection of bistatic radar or, more precisely, of bistatic synthetic aperture imaging radar. Owing to the palpable advantages offered by bistatic SAR compared to conventional monostatic SAR, the world-wide research activity culminated in various proof-of-concept experiments including air-to-ground [2]–[4], air-to-air [5]–[7], and space-to-ground [1], [4]. By 2008, even the first space-to-air experiments had been successfully conducted and presented [8], [9]. Bistatic space-to-space applications had been originally discussed by Massonet in [10], and are currently operationally employed by TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X to form a very high resolution topographic map of the entire Earth [11].
The main advantages of bistatic SAR are: Low probability of intercept based on the fact that the receiver does not emit electromagnetic energy thereby making it much harder to be detected and intercepted either by electronic jamming or destruction; Improved target recognition including stealthy targets based on the different aspect angle ranges resulting in much different reflection properties; and Forward/backward looking capability for the receiving unit under specific favourable geometry conditions [12], a trait physically impossible for a classic monostatic side-looking SAR. This feature might be of operational use as a bad-weather landing aid in aircrafts, or as an obstruction warning and avoidance system in helicopters.
There is a trade-off, however, between these advantages and several technological challenges, including: The two separate radar systems employ independent local oscillators so that their phase noise accumulates rather than cancelling out as in classic SAR [2]; The technological time, phase and antenna pointing (beam steering) synchronization challenges are much more complex [13]; The bistatic SAR image processing is much more difficult due to the truly 3D-geometry in contrast to the valid 2D-approximation for monostatic SAR. As a consequence, the bistatic range history cannot
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 1
be approximated as a parabola anymore and hence fast FFT-based focussing algorithms are not applicable [14]–[17]; and Even the theoretical derivation and prediction of the achievable resolution, which predominantly depends on the geometry, is much more complicated and the mathematical framework to achieve this has only been rather recently developed [1].
A natural step beyond this is to physically separate the locations of the received channels so as to explore a truly multistatic SAR capability. To this end, DRDC has designed, deployed, and processed its own ground-based C-band receiver system with the intention performing a contemporaneous data collection of multiple receivers illuminated from a single transmitting source, namely RS-2. It is the development of this DRDC prototype C-band receiver system that is documented in this report.
2 DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021
2 The bistatic SAR paradigm
2.1 Bistatic geometry Bistatic SAR differs from monostatic SAR in that the transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) do not use the same antenna, but are instead independent from each other. To form SAR imagery, at least one of the two must be in motion [1]. By using commercial SBR as the source of illumination, the simplest bistatic case involves the deployment of a stationary receiver. The bistatic SAR imagery is generated by measuring the radar signal scattered by objects in the scene toward the Rx antenna. Thus, line of sight must exist from the Tx antenna to the objects and from the objects to the receiver antenna. Elevation of the antennas is a primary method of achieving a maximal line of sight. While the ground based receiver does not need to lie within the footprint of the monostatic scene, there are advantages for having the receiver in the scene, which would allow direct path pulses generated within the main lobe of the transmitted signal to be collected to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The geometry for such a bistatic SAR scenario is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Bistatic geometry with moving Tx and elevated stationary Rx. 2.2 Frames of reference The evolution of SBR from RS-1 to RS-2 involves a change in the frame of reference used to describe the operation of these systems. In particular, the concept of the “broadside” direction has been redefined, allowing for a simplification in the calculations for RS-2 processing compared to RS-1.
When space-based radar illuminators are introduced, the frame of reference for the satellites is no longer synchronized to the rotating surface of the Earth. Typically, an earth centered inertial (ECI) coordinate system would be used, which is defined by the North vector, originating at Earth centre along the axis of Earth rotation passing to the North Pole and the vector from Earth centre to the ascending node of the orbit, which passes along the intersection of the orbit and equatorial planes. In the Mercator projection of this system, the nadir of the satellite orbit traces out a terminator like path while the Earth’s surface moves easternly beneath it. Note that the origin of this motion can still vary, by fixing a specific time at which the projection is viewed. Three consecutive orbits of RS-2 are shown in Figure 2(a–c). The Earth rotates eastward 25.25 in longitude, , during each 101 minute orbit, so that while the satellite returns to the same point in the frame of reference, the point on the ground beneath it is different each time, the dependency being that:
DRDC-RDDC-2021-R021 3