DOCSLIB.ORG

Freestyle, a Randomized Version of Chacha for Resisting Offline Brute-Force and Dictionary Attacks P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freestyle, a Randomized Version of Chacha for Resisting Offline Brute-Force and Dictionary Attacks P MANUSCRIPT FOR IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY 1 Freestyle, a randomized version of ChaCha for resisting offline brute-force and dictionary attacks P. Arun Babu and Jithin Jose Thomas Abstract—This paper introduces Freestyle, a randomized and Techniques such as introducing a delay between incor- variable round version of the ChaCha cipher. Freestyle uses rect key/password attempts, multi-factor authentication, and the concept of hash based halting condition where a decryption CAPTCHAs (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell attempt with an incorrect key is likely to take longer time to halt. This makes Freestyle resistant to key-guessing attacks i.e. Computers and Humans Apart) are being used to resist brute- brute-force and dictionary based attacks. Freestyle demonstrates force attacks over the network (i.e. on-line brute-force attack). a novel approach for ciphertext randomization by using random However, such techniques cannot be used if the ciphertext is number of rounds for each block, where the exact number available with the adversary (i.e. offline brute-force attack); of rounds are unknown to the receiver in advance. Freestyle for example: encrypted data gathered from a wireless channel, provides the possibility of generating 2128 different ciphertexts for a given key, nonce, and message; thus resisting key and nonce or lost/stolen encrypted files/disks. To resist offline brute- reuse attacks. Due to its inherent random behavior, Freestyle force attacks, key-stretching and slower algorithms [28] are makes cryptanalysis through known-plaintext, chosen-plaintext, preferred. Although, such techniques are useful, they are much and chosen-ciphertext attacks difficult in practice. On the other slower on low-powered devices, and also slow down genuine hand, Freestyle has costlier cipher initialization process, typically users. generates 3.125% larger ciphertext, and was found to be 1.6 to 3.2 times slower than ChaCha20. Freestyle is suitable for This paper makes three main contributions: (i) We demon- applications that favor ciphertext randomization and resistance strate the use of bounded hash based halting condition, which to key-guessing and key reuse attacks over performance and makes key-guessing attacks less effective by slowing down the ciphertext size. Freestyle is ideal for applications where ciphertext adversary, but remaining relatively computationally simpler can be assumed to be in full control of an adversary, and an for genuine users. We introduce the key guessing penalty, offline key-guessing attack can be carried out. which is a measure for a cipher’s resistance to key-guessing Index Terms—Brute-force resistant ciphers, dictionary based attacks. The physical significance of KGP is that the adversary attacks, key-guessing, probabilistic encryption, Freestyle, would require at least KGP times computational power than ChaCha. a genuine user to launch an effective key-guessing attack; (ii) We demonstrate a novel approach for ciphertext randomization I. INTRODUCTION by using random number of rounds for each block of message; Randomized (aka probabilistic) encryption scheme in- where the exact number of rounds are unknown to the receiver A volves a cipher that uses randomness to generate different in advance; (iii) We introduce the concept of non-deterministic ciphertexts for a given key, nonce (a.k.a. initial vector), and CTR mode of operation and demonstrate the possibility of message. The goal of randomization is to make cryptanalysis using the random round numbers to generate 2128 different difficult and a time consuming process. This paper presents the ciphertexts - even though the key, nonce, and message are design and analysis of Freestyle, a randomized and variable- the same. The randomization makes the cipher resistant to key round version of ChaCha cipher [1]. ChaCha20 (i.e. ChaCha re-installation attacks such as KRACK [13] and cryptanalysis with 20 rounds) is one of the modern, popular (for TLS [2] by XOR of ciphertexts in the event of the key and nonce and SSH [3], [4]), and faster symmetric stream cipher on being reused. arXiv:1802.03201v2 [cs.CR] 19 Feb 2018 most machines [5], [6]. Even on lightweight ciphers, realistic Freestyle attempts to address the following two issues: brute-force attacks with key sizes 128 bits is not feasible (i) reuse of a key and nonce combination is not secure in with current computational power.≥ However, algorithms and deterministic stream ciphers, as demonstrated attacks such applications that have lower key-space due to: (i) generation as Key installation attack (KRACK) [13]. And maintaining of keys from a poor (pseudo-)random number generator [7]– a list of used keys and nonces is an overhead, especially [12]; (ii) weak passwords being used to derive keys; and, for constrained and low-powered devices, (ii) Existing ciphers (iii) poor protocol or cryptographic implementations [13]–[15] take nearly the same amount of time to decrypt a message are prone to key-guessing attacks (brute-force and dictionary irrespective of whether the key used is correct or not. This based attacks). Also, steady advances are being made in the ar- makes lightweight ciphers prone to key-guessing attacks. The eas of GPUs [16]–[18], specialized hardware for cryptography proposed decryption algorithm in Freestyle is designed to be [19]–[24], and memories in terms of storage and in-memory computationally simpler for a user with a correct key; but, for processing [25]–[27] to speedup key-guessing attacks. an adversary with an incorrect key, the decryption algorithm is likely to take longer time to halt. Thus, each brute-force P. Arun Babu ([email protected]) is with the Robert Bosch Center for or dictionary attack attempt is likely to be computationally Cyber-physical Systems, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. Jithin Jose Thomas ([email protected]) was with the Department of Elec- expensive and time consuming. trical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. The rest of the paper is structured as follows: Table I MANUSCRIPT FOR IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY 2 TABLE I TABLE II LIST OF SYMBOLS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Notation Description Abbreviation Expansion Rmin The minimum number of rounds to be used ARX Add-Rotate-XOR 16 for encryption. Rmin 2 [1; 2 ] CAPTCHA Completely Automated Public Turing test Rmax The maximum number of rounds to be used for to tell Computers and Humans Apart 16 decryption. Rmax 2 [1; 2 ] and Rmax ≥ Rmin. CCA Chosen Ciphertext Attack R Number of rounds used to encrypt the current CPA Chosen Plaintext Attack CTR Counter mode of operation block of message. R = random(Rmin;Rmax) th DoS Denial of service R Number of rounds used to encrypt i block of i HKDF Halting Key-Derivation Function message. R = random(R ;R ) and i ≥ 0. i min max KGP Key Guessing Penalty r The current round number. r 2 [R ;R] min KPA Known Plaintext Attack h() Freestyle hash function which generates a 16-bit hash. KRACK Key Re-installation Attack HI Round intervals at which a 16-bit hash has to be MAC Message Authentication Code 2 j j computed. HI [1;Rmin], Rmin HI , Rmax HI . MITM Man In The Middle Attack HC The complexity of Freestyle’s hash function NONCE Number used once to be used. HC 2 f1; 2; 3g QR Quarter Round IC The log2(iterations) (or number of pepper bits) SSH Secure Shell to be used in during initialization. IC 2 [8; 32] TLS Transport Layer Security pepper The pepper value indicating the number of iterations required during initialization. pepper = random(0; 2IC − 1). CRi The number of rounds computed using an expected bit counter, and 64-bit nonce to form an initial cipher state th hash and pepper for i block of message. denoted by S(0), as: Epepper The expected value of pepper. ERw The expected number of rounds executed by an 2constant[0]; constant[1]; constant[2]; constant[3]3 adversary during cipher initialization. key[0]; key[1]; key[2]; key[3] ER The expected number of rounds used by a genuine user 6 7 to encrypt/decrypt a block of message. If a uniform 4 key[4]; key[5]; key[6]; key[7]5 Rmin + Rmax counter[0]; counter[1]; nonce[0]; nonce[1] distribution is used, then ER = . 2 v (in red color) An input variable. v (in green color) A variable derived from one or more input variables. ChaCha20 uses 10 double-rounds (or 20 rounds) on v (in blue color) An output variable. S(0); where each of the double-round consists of 8 quarter v(r) The value of v after r rounds of Freestyle rounds(QR) defined as: If v(0) is not explicitly defined, then v(0) = 0. th v[n] n element of v. QR (S[0];S[4];S[ 8];S[12]) jj Concatenation of and . v1 v2 v1 v2 QR (S[1];S[5];S[ 9];S[13]) v1 j v2 v2 is a factor of v1. (1) v1 ⊕ v2 Bit-wise XOR of v1 and v2. QR (S[2];S[6];S[10];S[14]) 32 v1 v2 Addition of v1 and v2 modulo 2 . QR (S[3];S[7];S[11];S[15]) 32 v1 v2 Subtraction of v1 and v2 modulo 2 . mod The modulo operator. QR (S[0];S[5];S[10];S[15]) v∗ Set of values guessed by an adversary for v. QR (S[1];S[6];S[11];S[12]) (2) cf (v1; v2) A set containing common factors of QR (S[2];S[7];S[ 8];S[13]) integers v1 and v2. QR (S[3];S[4];S[ 9];S[14]) jvj The length of v in bits. Nb The number of blocks in a message. The 16 elements of the cipher-state matrix are denoted jmessagej Nb = 512 by using an index in range [0,15], and the quarter-round QR(a; b; c; d) is defined as: P rn(X = 1) The probability of collision of a 16-bit hash th at the n trial when using an incorrect key.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FIPS 140-2 Non-Proprietary Security Policy
    Kernel Crypto API Cryptographic Module version 1.0 FIPS 140-2 Non-Proprietary Security Policy Version 1.3 Last update: 2020-03-02 Prepared by: atsec information security corporation 9130 Jollyville Road, Suite 260 Austin, TX 78759 www.atsec.com © 2020 Canonical Ltd. / atsec information security This document can be reproduced and distributed only whole and intact, including this copyright notice. Kernel Crypto API Cryptographic Module FIPS 140-2 Non-Proprietary Security Policy Table of Contents 1. Cryptographic Module Specification ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Module Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Modes of Operation ................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Cryptographic Module Ports and Interfaces ........................................................................................ 10 3. Roles, Services and Authentication ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1. Roles .......................................................................................................................................................11 3.2. Services ...................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Missing Difference Problem, and Its Applications to Counter Mode
    The Missing Difference Problem, and its Applications to Counter Mode Encryption? Ga¨etanLeurent and Ferdinand Sibleyras Inria, France fgaetan.leurent,[email protected] Abstract. The counter mode (CTR) is a simple, efficient and widely used encryption mode using a block cipher. It comes with a security proof that guarantees no attacks up to the birthday bound (i.e. as long as the number of encrypted blocks σ satisfies σ 2n=2), and a matching attack that can distinguish plaintext/ciphertext pairs from random using about 2n=2 blocks of data. The main goal of this paper is to study attacks against the counter mode beyond this simple distinguisher. We focus on message recovery attacks, with realistic assumptions about the capabilities of an adversary, and evaluate the full time complexity of the attacks rather than just the query complexity. Our main result is an attack to recover a block of message with complexity O~(2n=2). This shows that the actual security of CTR is similar to that of CBC, where collision attacks are well known to reveal information about the message. To achieve this result, we study a simple algorithmic problem related to the security of the CTR mode: the missing difference problem. We give efficient algorithms for this problem in two practically relevant cases: where the missing difference is known to be in some linear subspace, and when the amount of data is higher than strictly required. As a further application, we show that the second algorithm can also be used to break some polynomial MACs such as GMAC and Poly1305, with a universal forgery attack with complexity O~(22n=3).
    [Show full text]
  • On Comparing Side‑Channel Properties of AES and Chacha20 on Microcontrollers
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. On comparing side‑channel properties of AES and ChaCha20 on microcontrollers Najm, Zakaria; Jap, Dirmanto; Jungk, Bernhard; Picek, Stjepan; Bhasin, Shivam 2018 Najm, Z., Jap, D., Jungk, B., Picek, S., & Bhasin, S. (2018). On comparing side‑channel properties of AES and ChaCha20 on microcontrollers. 2018 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS). doi:10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605653 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104628 https://doi.org/10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605653 © 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605653 Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 18:00:37 SGT On Comparing Side-channel Properties of AES and ChaCha20 on Microcontrollers Zakaria Najm1,2, Dirmanto Jap1, Bernhard Jungk3, Stjepan Picek2, and Shivam Bhasin1 1Temasek Laboratories, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands 3Independent Researcher fzakaria.najm,djap,[email protected], bernhard@projectstarfire.de, [email protected] Abstract—Side-channel attacks are a real threat to many secure When considering countermeasures, it is also the nonlinear systems. In this paper, we consider two ciphers used in the operation which is expensive to implement protected against automotive industry – AES and ChaCha20 and we evaluate their side-channel attacks, unlike other linear components of the resistance against side-channel attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Cipher Designs: a Review
    SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences March 2020, Vol. 63 131101:1–131101:25 . REVIEW . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9929-x Stream cipher designs: a review Lin JIAO1*, Yonglin HAO1 & Dengguo FENG1,2* 1 State Key Laboratory of Cryptology, Beijing 100878, China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Received 13 August 2018/Accepted 30 June 2019/Published online 10 February 2020 Abstract Stream cipher is an important branch of symmetric cryptosystems, which takes obvious advan- tages in speed and scale of hardware implementation. It is suitable for using in the cases of massive data transfer or resource constraints, and has always been a hot and central research topic in cryptography. With the rapid development of network and communication technology, cipher algorithms play more and more crucial role in information security. Simultaneously, the application environment of cipher algorithms is in- creasingly complex, which challenges the existing cipher algorithms and calls for novel suitable designs. To accommodate new strict requirements and provide systematic scientific basis for future designs, this paper reviews the development history of stream ciphers, classifies and summarizes the design principles of typical stream ciphers in groups, briefly discusses the advantages and weakness of various stream ciphers in terms of security and implementation. Finally, it tries to foresee the prospective design directions of stream ciphers. Keywords stream cipher, survey, lightweight, authenticated encryption, homomorphic encryption Citation Jiao L, Hao Y L, Feng D G. Stream cipher designs: a review. Sci China Inf Sci, 2020, 63(3): 131101, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9929-x 1 Introduction The widely applied e-commerce, e-government, along with the fast developing cloud computing, big data, have triggered high demands in both efficiency and security of information processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Deriving Chacha20 Key Streams from Targeted Memory Analysis
    Deriving ChaCha20 Key Streams From Targeted Memory Analysis Peter McLaren, William J Buchanan, Gordon Russell, Zhiyuan Tan School of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK. Abstract—There can be performance and vulnerability con- keys without impacting the target and for target applications cerns with block ciphers, thus stream ciphers can used as an alter- to be unaware of extraction. native. Although many symmetric key stream ciphers are fairly The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section II resistant to side-channel attacks, cryptographic artefacts may exist in memory. This paper identifies a significant vulnerability discusses related research including side-channel studies and within OpenSSH and OpenSSL and which involves the discovery background on stream ciphers and ChaCha20 cipher imple- of cryptographic artefacts used within the ChaCha20 cipher. This mentations is presented in Section III. Section IV provides can allow for the cracking of tunneled data using a single targeted relevant details of the framework and its implementation is memory extraction. With this, law enforcement agencies and/or given in Section V. The results are presented and discussed in malicious agents could use the vulnerability to take copies of the encryption keys used for each tunnelled connection. The Section VI and conclusions drawn in Section VII. user of a virtual machine would not be alerted to the capturing of the encryption key, as the method runs from an extraction II. RELATED WORK of the running memory. Methods of mitigation include making This paper focuses on the decrypting network traffic en- cryptographic artefacts difficult to discover and limiting memory crypted with ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Authenticated Encryption Algorithms
    Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Optimizing authenticated encryption algorithms Master’s Thesis Ondrej Mosnáček Brno, Fall 2017 Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Optimizing authenticated encryption algorithms Master’s Thesis Ondrej Mosnáček Brno, Fall 2017 This is where a copy of the official signed thesis assignment and a copy ofthe Statement of an Author is located in the printed version of the document. Declaration Hereby I declare that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out on my own. All sources, references, and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Ondrej Mosnáček Advisor: Ing. Milan Brož i Acknowledgement I would like to thank my advisor, Milan Brož, for his guidance, pa- tience, and helpful feedback and advice. Also, I would like to thank my girlfriend Ludmila, my family, and my friends for their support and kind words of encouragement. If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter. — Blaise Pascal iii Abstract In this thesis, we look at authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD), which is a cryptographic scheme that provides both confidentiality and integrity of messages within a single operation. We look at various existing and proposed AEAD algorithms and compare them both in terms of security and performance. We take a closer look at three selected candidate families of algorithms from the CAESAR competition. Then we discuss common facilities provided by the two most com- mon CPU architectures – x86 and ARM – that can be used to implement cryptographic algorithms efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Primus HSM E-Series
    The affordable hardware security module Primus HSM E-Series Market-leading price-performance ratio HSM Network Appliance as a replacement for PCIe cards Simple setup, configuration, and maintenance Tamper protection during transport, storage, and operation Scalable and flexible partitionable to your needs Designed, developed, and manufactured in Switzerland The E-Series of our Primus HSM offers high performance at an outstanding price. Connecting the devices to existing systems is just as easy as commissioning. Different performance classes The E-Series is available in various performance classes: E20, E60 and E150. It can be configu- red via the serial port or over the network with our Decanus remote terminal. Applications The devices of the E-Series are very versatile. Built as network appliances, they lack the disad- vantages of PCIe-based solutions like software dependance of PCIe host systems and the host system itself. The E-Series is ideally suited to secure financial transactions such as EBICS and PCI, access to the cloud (CASB), key management in the PKI environment, or to protect blockchain systems, crypto assets management. Functions The devices generate encryption keys, store and manage the distribution of these keys. Besides key management, they also perform authentication and encryption tasks. Multiple Primus HSM can be grouped together to support redundancy and load balancing. Each Primus HSM can also be partitioned for multiple users (multi-tenancy). Primus supports symmetric (AES, Camellia), asymmetric (RSA, ECC, Diffie-Hellman), and hashing (SHA-2, SHA-3) cryptographic algorithms. They can be seamlessly and easily integrated into any network environment. The Primus E-Se- ries HSM can be remote controlled with our Decanus Remote Control Terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Chacha20 and Poly1305 Cipher Suites for TLS
    ChaCha20 and Poly1305 Cipher Suites for TLS Adam Langley Wan-Teh Chang Outline ● ChaCha20 stream cipher ● Poly1305 authenticator ● ChaCha20+Poly1305 AEAD construction ● TLS cipher suites ● Performance ChaCha20 stream cipher ● Designed by Dan J. Bernstein ● A variant of Salsa20 to improve diffusion ● Used in BLAKE, a SHA-3 finalist ● 256-bit key ● 64-bit nonce ● 64-bit block counter ● Outputs a 64-byte block of key stream and increments block counter in each invocation ● Plaintext is XOR’ed with the key stream ChaCha20 function constants key counter nonce Input S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 State (16 words) S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 Output key stream (64 bytes) Poly1305 authenticator ● A Wegman-Carter, one-time authenticator ● Designed by Dan J. Bernstein ● 256-bit key ● 128-bit output Poly1305 calculation Key (r, s): r => integer R, s => integer S Input is divided into 16-byte chunks C0 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 . Cn-2 Cn-1 C0*R^n + C1*R^(n-1) + C2*R^(n-2) + … + Cn-2*R^2 + Cn-1*R mod (2^130- 5) Evaluate this polynomial with Horner’s Rule + S mod 2^128 AEAD construction ● The AEAD key is a ChaCha20 key ● For each nonce, derive: Poly1305 key = ChaCha20(000...0, counter=0) Discard the last 32 bytes of output ● A = additional data ● S = ChaCha20(plaintext, counter=1) ● T = Poly1305(A || len(A) || S || len(S)) ● Ciphertext = S || T TLS cipher suites ● Three forward secret, AEAD ciphers: ○ TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 ○ TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 ○ TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 ● No implicit nonce: fixed_iv_length
    [Show full text]
  • Mackerel: a Progressive School of Cryptographic Thought
    Mackerel: A Progressive School of Cryptographic Thought JUSTIN TrOUTMAN AND VINceNT RIjmeN Justin Troutman is a Troutman and Rijmen offer a framework for creating and fielding new security systems involving cryptography. Without this or a similar framework to coordinate efforts between different stake- cryptographer with research holder communities, we are doomed to continue providing systems that provide less than expected, interests in designing take too long from conceptual birth to fielding, and still leave us at unacceptable risk. authenticated encryption Their framework is “chunked” to nicely fit the natural flow of effort from cryptographers to develop- constructions, optimizing the ers to users; this allows each profession to maximize its strengths and not be unnecessarily befud- user experience of cryptographic products, and dled by work going on in sister professions that are also needed to complete full delivery of effective analyzing methodologies for signals intelligence. systems—systems that can be deployed and safely used by customers with minimal training. He has worked with Microsoft, Google, Duke Is this work perfect and fully fleshed out? NO. Is it a big step in the right direction? I think YES! Read University, and IEEE. He co-developed the and enjoy; it is an easy read that should plant interesting concepts in your mind that will take root “green cryptography” strategy for minimizing and grow, leading to further needed developments. implementation complexity, while maximizing —Brian Snow, former Technical Director of Information Assurance at NSA. cryptographic security, by recycling components for multiple purposes. He is currently organizing ryptography is hard, but it’s the easy part.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Cryptography Bruce Barnett Who Am I?
    Bad Cryptography Bruce Barnett Who am I? • Security consultant @ NYSTEC • 22 years a research scientist @ GE’s R&D Center • 15 years software developer, system administrator @ GE and Schlumberger • I’m not a cryptographer • I attended a lot of talks at Blackhat/DEFCON • Then I took a course on cryptography……….. Who should attend this talk? • Project Managers • Computer programmers • Those that are currently using cryptography • Those that are thinking about using cryptography in systems and protocols • Security professionals • Penetration testers who don’t know how to test cryptographic systems and want to learn more • … and anybody who is confused by cryptography Something for everyone What this presentation is … • A gentle introduction to cryptography • An explanation why cryptography can’t be just “plugged in” • Several examples of how cryptography can be done incorrectly • A brief description of why certain choices are bad and how to exploit it. • A checklist of warning signs that indicate when “Bad Cryptography” is happening. Example of Bad Cryptography!!! Siren from snottyboy http://soundbible.com/1355-Warning-Siren.html What this talk is not about • No equations • No certificates • No protocols • No mention of SSL/TLS/HTTPS • No quantum cryptography • Nothing that can cause headaches • (Almost) no math used Math: Exclusive Or (XOR) ⊕ Your Cat Your Roommates' Will you have Cat kittens? No kittens No kittens Note that this operator can “go backwards” (invertible) What is encryption and decryption? Plain text Good Morning, Mr. Phelps
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Message Authentication Codes for Secure Ethernet
    Performance of Message Authentication Codes for Secure Ethernet Philipp Hagenlocher Advisors: Dominik Scholz & Fabien Geyer Seminar Future Internet SS2018 Chair of Network Architectures and Services Departments of Informatics, Technical University of Munich Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT connection establishment in order to waste resources on the Cyclic redundancy checks within Ethernet do not provide server until a denial of service is reached. To combat this data integrity, which can be solved by using message au- attack scheme, a hash function is used to compute a hash thentication codes (MACs) within Ethernet frames. This combining the IP address of the client, port numbers and a paper gives theoretical background on hash functions and timestamp. This hash is then used as the sequence number hash-based MACs, different schemes are compared for the for the packet. This way the client is identified by this hash, usage in Ethernet frames by multiple attributes such as thus the server can free old resources if a new SYN is sent by performance, output lengths and security. The functions the client. Another important usage for hash functions are Poly1305, Skein and BLAKE2 are tested for throughput lookup tables, where hash functions are used to group val- against implementations of a SHA-2 HMAC and SipHash ues into segments that can be retrieved in faster time than and the results are discussed. Numerical measurements and a simple lookup in a set of elements. results show that Poly1305 is a suitable candidate for the usage as a per-packet MAC. 1.1 Outline This paper is structured as follows: At first it will explain Keywords the theory behind hash functions and hash-based MACs in Message Authentication Codes, Hash functions, Performance Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Committing Authenticated Encryption
    Committing Authenticated Encryption • What is it? How is it different than regular AE? • Why is it important? What goes wrong without it? • Why is an RFC needed? What should the RFC say? Committing authenticated encryption (cAE): AE where it’s hard to find a ciphertext with multiple correct decryptions. cAE => ciphertexts are binding commitments “Physical” Encryption Many people think of authenticated encryption as a lock box. Fine intuition, if keys are random and hidden: - The box hides what’s inside it (confidentiality) - Can’t change already-locked box (integrity) This intuition fails badly if keys can be adversarial. “Physical” Encryption This intuition fails badly if keys can be adversarial. AE has no security with attacker control of keys: ciphertexts can have multiple correct decryptions. cAE = AE + binds attacker to a single decryption • What is it? How is it different than regular AE? • Why is it important? What goes wrong without it? • Why is an RFC needed? What should the RFC say? Committing authenticated encryption (cAE): AE where it’s hard to find a ciphertext with multiple correct decryptions. cAE => ciphertexts are binding commitments CTR mode is not committing Any ciphertext can be decrypted under any key. Adding a MAC does not help: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is not committing. Plaintext ⨁ Pad Derive Pad = IV Ciphertext ⨁ Derive Pad’ Pad’ = Plaintext’ CTR mode is not committing Any ciphertext can be decrypted under any key. Adding a MAC does not help: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is not committing. Scheme cAE? AES-GCM No
    [Show full text]