DR-19-00571 1035 Pennsylvania Street; Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Residential Demolition and New Construction

Agenda Item Report

Historic Resources Commission - Dec 19 2019

Department Staff Contact Planning & Development Kyle Kobe, Planner I Services

Recommendations DR-19-00571 1035 Pennsylvania Street; Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for a residential demolition and new construction. The proposed project is located in the environs of the Sargent S Whitcomb House (1029 Delaware Street). Submitted by David Clemente of Summit Builders, LLC on behalf of Mike and Tami Nevels, property owners of record.

Executive Summary The applicant is requesting to demolish the existing structure located on the property at 1035 Pennsylvania Street. The applicant has provided information that demonstrates that the property is in poor condition. According to information supplied by the applicant, much of the building is in poor or fair-to-poor condition. The cost to repair the current structure is estimated at just over $600,000 while the construction of a new structure of equal size and quality is estimated at just under $800,000. The existing structure is vacant and was previously used by the non-profit Penn House. The current structure was designed for a specific and different use than the one intended by the applicant.

The residence will feature modern materials and design elements. The roof form will be a series of varying height shed roof elements. The roof material will be 3D composition shingles and will have smart trim fascia board with a 5 inch aluminum gutter on the north and south sides. The applicant has indicated the proposed windows will be black Quaker brand vinyl clad windows, but that it is a hybrid vinyl/fiberglass/composite material. Transom and horizontal windows on the front elevation will be fixed, while all other main floor windows are casement. Lower level windows are sliding for fire egress. Siding materials consist of 8 inch Smart Lap (wood composite) siding, Cultured Stone stone veneer, 8 inch cedar vertical siding, and stucco.

Strategic Plan Critical Success Factor Safe, Healthy, and Welcoming Neighborhoods

Fiscal Impact N/A

Action Requested In accordance with Chapter 22 of the Code of the City of Lawrence, the standards of evaluation, staff recommends the Commission find that the proposed project will not

Page 1 of 25 significantlyencroach on, damage, or destroy the landmarks or their environs and issue the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed project.

Attachments DR-19-00571 - Staff Report - 1035 Pennsylvania St Plan Drawings Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis Location Map

Page 2 of 25 Lawrence Historic Resources Commission 1035 Pennsylvania Street DR-19-00571

Residential Demolition and New Construction Dec 19, 2019

Applicant Request David Clemente with Summit The applicant is requesting to demolish the existing residential structure and Builders, LLC on behalf of build a new residential structure. Mike and Tami Nevels, property owners of record. Reason for Request The property is located within the environs of the Sargent S Whitcomb House Standards for Review (1029 Delaware Street).

Chapter 22 Staff Recommendation  Environs of the Sargent S Whitcomb Certificate of Appropriateness House (1029 In accordance with Chapter 22 of the Code of the City of Lawrence, the Delaware Street) standards of evaluation, staff recommends the Commission find that the o Area 1 proposed project will not significantly encroach on, damage, or destroy the landmarks or their environs and issue the Certificate of Appropriateness for Associated Cases the proposed project. DR-19-00386 (withdrawn by applicant)

Project Background

Page 3 of 25 The property has been the site for the non-profit Penn House for many years until recently. The Penn House use had been established and regulated by site plans and special use permits. The zoning of the property is RS5 (Single-Dwelling Residential) District. As such, a use similar to the one previously occupying this property would likely require a special use permit or site planning approval.

Project Description

The applicant is requesting to demolish the existing structure located on the property located at 1035 Pennsylvania Street. The applicant has provided information that demonstrates that the property is in poor condition. According to information supplied by the applicant, much of the building is in poor or fair-to-poor condition. The cost to repair the current structure is estimated at just over $600,000 while the construction of a new structure of equal size and quality is estimated at just under $800,000. The existing structure is vacant and was previously used by the non-profit Penn House. The current structure was designed for a specific and different use than the one intended by the applicant.

This parcel contains two platted lots (Lots 79 and 81 of the Original Townsite). Each platted lot comprises half of the total parcel. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the property, and to build a new detached dwelling structure on the northern half of the parcel (Lot 79).

The proposed structure will be set back 20 feet from the east (front) lot line, 5 feet from the north and south (interior side yard) lot lines, and approximately 51 feet from the west (rear) lot line. A 4 foot wide sidewalk is proposed from Pennsylvania Street frontage to the 42.5 square foot front porch slab. A 400 foot patio is proposed off of the back of the house next to a 52 square foot window well, and a 648 square foot reinforced concrete pad for parking is proposed off of the alley to the rear. The highest point of the structure will be 19 feet 2 inches. The footprint of the structure will be 1,411 square feet with a total impervious coverage area of the lot of 2,602 square feet. The house will consist of a main (ground floor) level containing a master bedroom, great room, kitchen/dining room area, study room, bathrooms, laundry and closet space. The lower level will be comprised of storage spaces, family room, bathroom, and two additional bedrooms.

The east elevation, facing Pennsylvania Street, will have stucco, cedar siding, and stone veneer elements. The south side of the elevation will feature a projecting element of the house, extending past the front door, which will be covered by stucco. This portion of the building will have three horizontal windows and will be covered by a shed roof sloping downward towards

Page 4 of 25 the right of way. The central part of the elevation will have board and batten smart lap siding, the front door, a front porch slab covered by a small roof type element, and two windows. The north third of the elevation will be covered in stone veneer and will have two horizontal windows. These portions of the structure will be covered by a shed roof slanting downward from south to north (left to right).

The north elevation will be comprised primarily of 8 inch smart lap siding material and the slope of the shed roof. On the east (left) side of the elevation will be the board and batten siding, cedar siding, and stucco material.

The west elevation will contain a patio area and smart lap siding material. All three of the shed roof elements will be visible. The primary roof line will slope downward from south to north (right to left), a secondary roof element will slope from north to south (left to right), and the rear side of the front facing shed roof element. Two individual windows will be on the north (left) side of the structure, with a cluster of vertical and horizontal windows near the center of the wall, and a rear sliding glass door entering out onto the patio on the south (right) side.

The south elevation will consist primarily of smart lap siding material. 3D composition shingles will be visible on the shed roof element sloping downwards on the south side of the structure. There will be four horizontal windows between the southern sloping shed roof and the northern sloping shed roof. The east (right) side of the elevation will consist of stucco material with a shed roof sloping west to east (left to right) and have one vertical rectangular window.

Project Review

Environs review for a Certificate of Appropriateness begins with a presumption that a Certificate of Appropriateness will be approved unless the proposed construction or demolition would significantly encroach on, damage, or destroy the landmark or historic district. The review focuses on the listed property and how the project interacts with the listed property, not how the project affects the subject property. The environs definition for Area 1 of the Whitcomb House at 1029 Delaware Street states that for major projects all design elements are important. It also states that maintaining the existing structures and visual appearance of the environs is the primary focus of review and that main structure demolitions should be approved only if documentation is provided indicating that the structure is unsound and/or a certificate of economic hardship is approved.

Page 5 of 25 Section 22-506(c)(2) provides review criteria for new construction. Identified criteria for new construction includes building scale, height, orientation, site coverage, spatial separation from other buildings, facade and window patterns, entrance and porch size and general design, materials, textures, color, architectural details, roof forms, emphasis on horizontal or vertical elements, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features deemed appropriate by the Commission. New buildings do not have to duplicate older styles of architecture, but they must be compatible with the architecture of the area in design and materials.

The proposed new construction is generally compatible with the environs of the listed property. As this is new construction, the review of this proposal is somewhat different than if the building were being remodeled or rehabilitated. The majority of the elements of the proposed structures are compatible with the environs of the listed property.

Page 6 of 25 There are several architectural features of a modern design that would not typically be found in a historic district. Since this is new construction, modern features are acceptable so long as they are compatible with the character of the environs. The architectural elements of this project are generally compatible with the environs of the listed property. There are other detached residences with similar features nearby (such as shed roof forms and nontraditional materials).

The environs definition states that existing structures should be maintained and that demolitions should only be approved if the structure is found to be unsound or a certificate of economic hardship is approved. The applicant has supplied information regarding the state of the property at this time. While the repair of the property would be less than a demolition and rebuilding of it, the applicant is also proposing a fundamentally different use than what is on the property as of right now. While the use and pattern of development are changing, the predominant building pattern for the area is detached dwellings. The proposed project would replace the existing structure with detached dwellings, which are more common in the surrounding area than the existing structure.

Staff is of the opinion that the project, as proposed, meets the intent of Chapter 22 and the environs definition for the Sargent S Whitcomb House.

Page 7 of 25 Existing Structure

Environs for the Sargent S Whitcomb House at 1029 Delaware Street.

The Environs for the 1029 Delaware Street, the Sargent S Whitcomb House, should be reviewed in the following manner. The Environs should is divided into two areas and the proposed project is located in Area One. The following standards apply.

Area One Maintaining the existing structures and visual appearance of the environs is the primary focus of review. Main structure demolitions would be approved only if documentation was provided that indicated that the structure was unsound and/or a certificate of economic hardship was approved.

Minor projects (minor additions, porch remodeling, windows and floor changes, demolition of outbuildings, etc.) will be approved administratively by the Historic Resources Administrator. All design elements are important. The proposed alterations or construction should meet the intent of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, the Standards and Guidelines for Evaluating the Effect on Project on Environs, and the Criteria set forth in 22-205.

Major projects (major additions, new infill construction, major alterations, etc.) would be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission. All design elements are important. The proposed alteration or construction should meet the intent of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, the Standards and Guidelines for Evaluating the Effect on Project on Environs, and the Criteria set forth in 22-205.

Page 8 of 25 7

Page 9 of 25 3D COMPOSITION SHINGLES

SMART SIDE 4' X 9' WITH SMART TRIM 3D 1" X 3" BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 16" O. C. COMPOSITION 5" ALUMINUM SHINGLES GUTTER

5" ALUMINUM E T

GUTTER A D

STUCCO Y B STUCCO 8" SMART LAP 6.5" +/- 8" SMART LAP 6.5" +/- EXPOSED 3/4" X 8" T & G CEDAR EXPOSED N O VERICAL SIDING I T P I R C S E

SOUTH ELEVATION - SIDE SMART SIDE 4' X 9' WITH SMART TRIM NORTH ELEVATION - SIDE D

1" X 3" BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 16" O. C. . O N Cross Section 2 Elevation 5

BUILT-UP SMART S

TRIM FASCIA BOARD, N O

1" X 12" AND 1" X 8" W/ I 1" X 2" ON BACK SIDE 5" ALUMINUM T OF FASCIA A GUTTER V E : L E L T E I T

T E E

5" ALUMINUM H S GUTTER Page 10 of 25 10' X 4' WOOD LANDING A

BELOW SLIDING GLASS DOOR I WTIH WOOD STEPS AS PER N CITY CODE A V L

8" SMART LAP 6.5" +/- Y

EXPOSED S N : N N E O I P T P I

WEST ELEVATION - BACK R 5 C S 3 E 0 D Cross Section 3 T 1 C E J

1" X 12" SMART O R TRIM FASCIA 3/4" x 8" T & G CEDAR P SMART SIDE 4' X 9' VERICAL SIDING WITH SMART TRIM

1" X 3" BOARD AND S E R BATTEN SIDING 16" O. 3D COMPOSITION BUILT-UP SMART TRIM T

3D COMPOSITION E

C. N

SHINGLES SHINGLES FASCIA BOARD, D E L

1" X 12" AND 1" X 8" W/ I M : E U 1" X 2" ON BACK SIDE Y B L

5" ALUMINUM B D

OF FASCIA C E

D GUTTER T I I V D O I R M P

V S M A G U 19' 2" 5" ALUMINUM N I D S GUTTER W

STUCCO A R D

CULTURED STONE DATE:

11-21-19

SCALE: 8" TO GRADE 1/4" =1'

NOTE: VINYL/COMPOSITE WINDOWS SHEET: EAST ELEVATION - FRONT Cross Section 1 A-1 50' 50' 2' ROOF EXTERIOR WALLS OVER HANG BELOW

24' ' 0 2 E T A ' 7 D 2

SET BACK LINE Y B

3/12" PITCH N " 2 - O ' I 1 5 T P I

3/12" PITCH R C S E D .

24' X 27' - 4" REINFORCED CONCRETE O N PAD FOR PARKING 648 SQ FT N

2' ROOF A

PATIO L

20' P OVER HANG 400 SQ FT

E T I ' S 6

1 D WINDOW WELL N A

13' : F 4 E L O T

PORCH ROOF I T

3/12" O T

1/12 PITCH E EXTERIOR WALLS R E

PITCH H BELOW S ' ' ' 7 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 11 of 25

4" ROOF A

ROOF PLAN I

OVER HANG N

40' A V " 0 1

1st Floor L - ' " 2 0 3 Y 1 - ' 5 S 3 N : N " N 0 E 1 O - ' I 5 P T 4 P

I R 5 C S 3 E 0 D

5' 1 C E J O R 5850 SQ FT LOT P

1411 SQ FT HOUSE 20'-6" 100 SQ FT WALK 5' 8'-6"

43 SQ FT PORCH S ' E 5 R

400 SQ FT PATIO T E

648 SQ FT PARKING PORCH SLAB N D

42.5 SQ FT E

______12' L I M : E U 4' Y B L

2602 SQ FT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA B D

C E

44% OF SITE D

SIDEWALK T I I

100 SQ FT V

SET BACK LINE D O I R M P

V S M A G

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA U N I D S W A ' R 0 2 D

DATE:

11-18-19

50' 50' SCALE:

1/8" =1'

FUTURE BUILDING SITE SITE PLAN - 1035 PENNSYLVANIA SHEET: LAWRENCE, KANSAS A-4 40' 16" X 8" CONCRETE FOOTING WITH 3 - #4 REBAR 20'-6" 13' 6'-6"

8" X 9' CONCRETE WALLS WITH 2' O.C. #4 REBAR VERTICAL E

HOLD DOWN 4" T

AND 5 - #4 REBAR HORIZONTAL A D

11 7/8" I - JOIST FLOOR, FLOOR JOIST 19.2" O.C., 40 PSI LL, 15 PSI DL Y B

3' - 4" FOUNDATION WALL '

NOTE: 4" NOTE: 4" 4

50/48S EGRESS 50/48S EGRESS N O I T P I R C S E D " 6 SOLID BLOCKING . - ' O N 5 UNDER POST AND BEAM ABOVE BEDROOM BEDROOM 15' 12' 13'

FLOOR JOIST " " N 8 8 - - ' ' 11 7/8" I-JOIST 600IB FLOOR JOIST 11 7/8" I-JOIST 600IB FLOOR JOIST O L " 3 3 C I " S 3' - 4" FOUNDATION WALL " 6 ' 1 1 6 E - T 5 3 0 ' 6 0 - ' 3 1

4 LB WALL V 1 A - 6 ' E 1

16" X 8" FOOTING 2 D 3 WITH 3 1/2" REBAR L

N " R U 0 E 1 O - ' " " F 6 W 8

6 - 3 - ' ' O : 4 6068 6068 D 4 E L 2

FAMILY L N T I T A

" " " T 4 4 4 3'-6" E 15' - 8'-6" 3'-6" - - 8'-10" ' ' ' E H 2 2 2 S 2668 2668 " C S Y 6 6 T - 3 I ' 0 N 3

4 2 -11 7/8" LVL A 8 ' 6 30" X 30" X 12" PAD V Page 12 of 25 UP HEADER 4 4 " 2 2

W/ 3 1/2" REBAR MAT X 2 " 4 24" DEADMAN 4 A - ' I " HOLD DOWN 24"

9 BATH 0 N 1 - ' A 5 17'-2" 15'-10" 7'-2" V 4 8 " ' 6 L 6 0 4 REF DW MICRO 2 1 Y - ' S 6

3'-4" 2868 N " : N 8 N E SIDE VENT O HVAC I

SOLID BLOCKING P T

WATER HEATER HOLD DOWN P 24" DEADMAN OC UNDER POST AND BEAM ABOVE I R SLAB 2" 5 HOLD DOWN 24" FLOOR DRAIN SUMP C S 3 " FLOOR E

8 36" X 36" X 12" PAD PUMP 0 D " - ' 2 -11 7/8" DRAIN 0 T

W/ 3 1/2" REBAR MAT X 2 1 3

FINISHED WALL C 1 -

LVL BEAM E ' " DIMENSION J 8 O 6 SUMP - R ' P

7 SLEEVE

H 11'-10" 8'-6" D ' 7'-3" 12'-5" 6 3 3 0 3 STORAGE 3 -11 7/8" LVL BEAM S E R T E ' "

11 7/8" I-JOIST 600IB FLOOR JOIST N 3 " 0 D E 2 1 - L - ' ' I M 1 4 : 2 E U Y B L

B D

C E

D T I " I V D H 4 O - D ' I ' 6 R M 3 3 5 P 0

V 3 S M A G U N ' I D 0 S W 1 A R

4" KEY WAY HOLD DOWN 8" D

" STUB REBAR OUT 6 - '

5 DATE: LIVING AREA 11-21-19 1013 SQ FT

SCALE: HOLD DOWN STRAPS 12' 8'-6" 19'-6" 1/4" =1'

40' SHEET: A-3 40'

26' 14'

11" 1'-1" E

3' 6' 3'-10" 7'-6" 5'-8" 2'-6" 7' 2'-6" T A D 2 - 2" X 6" LSL BRACED WALL 30/66 TRIPLE BRACED WALL 6/0 BETWEEN TRANSOMS 30/66SC 30/66SC 90/36 TRANS Y

72/18 TRANS EGRESS EGRESS B 90/18 TRANS 4'-7" INSTALL 7/16" OSB 1'-1"

5 FULL HEIGHT 2" X 6" STUDS ON N

AFTER INSULATION O I

EACH SIDE OF WINDOW OPENING T P 4 MIN. - 2" X 6" WALL I R

ASTRIA FIREPLACES 12' - 5 1/2" WALL C

BLOCK SOLID TO FOUNDATION S

CRAFTSMAN 36" E D 41 3/4" x 41 3/4" FRAMED OPENING

DINING .

6" UP FROM FLOOR O

(3) 1 3/4" X 18" LVL ABOVE USE N SIMPSON COIL STRAP TO STRAP WALL ABOVE TO BEAM ' 6 " 1 VAULT VAULT VAULT 1 1 - ' 7 " 26' 14' 1 L 5 - ' E

1 GREAT MASTER BDRM 2 V

DW E

T-WIND BRACE X 2 L IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS GAS 4 CLERESTORY WINDOWS N

ON EACH OF WALL I RANGE BRACED WALL

56/18 TRANS - EQUAL SPACE INSIDE A ' 2 - 2" X 8" MIN. HEADERS 8 M : " " E 0 1 2/4 2/6 L - ' 1 T I - ' 0 T

2 1

28" OPENING T 3 E

W/3 1/2" X 3 1/2" HEADER E H 4' " S NITCH 4 -

1'-11" ' 4'-11" 22'-8" 3'-9" 5 6'-9" R 4 MIN. - 2" X 6" BLOCK VAULT " T

6 KITCHEN 6 - Page 13 of 25 1

4 - 2" X 4" SOLID BLOCK ' SOLID TO FOUNDATION / 6 5 BELOW SUBFLOORING BATH 6 A " 99 3/4" HEADER HEIGHT 17' DN I

0 2 /0 1

INSTALL 7/16" OSB W/2 - 2" x 8" HEADER N -

' 12'-5" ' 4 " / 2 4 5 LET INTO 1ST TOP PLATE A 9 22' - 4 ' REF V 4

VAULT L BRACED WALL PANTRY OVEN AND 2" X 6" WALL

MICROWAVE Y W/T-ANGLE WIND BRACE W D 2/4 S "

9" WALL 2 88" WALL - N '

PLANT SHELF 2

9'-7" : N N " E VAULT " ABOVE O 5

BATH I 4 - " "

13' - 10 1/2" TOP OF BEAM P ' T - R 8 4 / ' " / P T 5 4 2 9

2 I - - 4 6 30" VANITY 6 ' ' 2 -11 7/8 LVL ABOVE 1

VAULT R - 5 /

ENTRY ' 8 6 5 C 4 7 S VAULT 3 2" X 6" EXTERIOR WALLS UP 12' - 3/4" WALL BRACED WALL E 0 D 2/4 HEADER T CLOSET 1 LAUNDRY C E " All WALLS OVER 14' TALL SHALL BE BALOONED FRAME WITH 2' X 6" 16" O. C. J 4 O

99 3/4" HEADER HEIGHT " - R 8'-4" 3'-6" ' 6'-2" 2'-4" 7'-3" 12'-5" 4 " P - 3 '

W/2 - 2" x 8" HEADER 0 5 9' CEILING CLOSET 9' CEILING / 4 - 2

14" I-JOIST IB-600 16' O. C. ROOF RAFTERS ' LET INTO 1ST TOP PLATE 2/6 5 28/42 SC 48/18 TR 48/18 TR 9' ENTRY CEILING ' 3 HOLD ALL HEADERS TIGHT TO TOP PLATES 5068 S S C E S S E 6 R R T 6 /

LADDER FRAME ALL NONLOAD BEARING OPENINGS G 0 3/0 E 3 E 12' WALL N 2 -11 7/8 LVL UP D

6" E R-21 BLOWN-IN SIDE WALL INSULATION BRACED WALL HEADER 9' LONG L I M : E U NO LOAD Y B L

' R-49 CEILING INSULATION CAULK ALL PLATES AND BORED OPENINGS 8' - 6" X 5' PORCH B D 2

C E 1

D ' T I 0 STUDY I V D 1 O I R M P

V S VAULT M A G U N I D S W A R D

1,515 SQ FT FINISHED MAIN LEVEL 3 - 66/18 12" OFF OF FLOOR DATE: 8" BETWEEN WINDOWS 1'-10" 1'-11" 17,175 CUBIC FT FINISHED MAIN LEVEL LOWER WINDOW TEMP. GLASS 2'-9" 2'-4" 2'-8" 4' 4' BRACED WALL 30,690 CUBIC FT FINISHED HOUSE BRACED WALL 11-21-19 12' 8'-6" 9'-9" 9'-9" SCALE: 40' 1/4" = 1' LIVING AREA 1411 SQ FT SHEET: A-2 September 4, 2019

Penn House Redevelopment 1035 Pennsylvania Street, Lawrence, Kansas

Historic Resources Commission Review Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis

Page 14 of 25 blank.

Page 15 of 25 Contents

Existing Structure Assessment 4 Cost Analysis 5 Exterior Photos 6 Interior Photos 10

Page 16 of 25 Existing Structure Assessment

General Description Non-historic, vacant, single-story, wood structure; approximately 32 years old. The building was previously occupied by the Lawrence non-profit organization Penn House.

Structure Item Description Condition Construction Wood Frame (Type V-B) Fair Foundation Slab-on-Grade Average

Site Item Description Condition Driveway Concrete Poor Loading Dock Concrete Poor Public Sidewalk Concrete Average Fence Chain-link Poor Landscape Overgrown Trees and Vegetation Fair Drainage Positive Slope away from Structure Fair

Exterior Envelope Item Description Condition Exterior Wall Finish Board & Batten Wood Siding - Painted Fair - Poor Windows Double-Hung, Single Pane w/ Storm Windows Poor Doors Multiple Types & Sizes Fair - Poor Roof Composite Asphalt Shingle Poor Gutters / Downspouts Aluminum, K-Style Poor Soffit Wood - Painted Poor Trim Wood - Painted Poor

Interior Item Description Condition Flooring Vinyl Composite Tile Poor Walls Gypsum or Composite Wood Paneling Fair - Poor Ceiling Gypsum Fair - Poor Doors Hollow-core Wood Fair - Poor (or missing) Trim Wood Fair - Poor Lighting Decorative, Recessed & Surface Mounted Fair - Poor (or missing) Electrical Outlets Fair - Poor (or missing) Plumbing Fixtures Restroom & Kitchen Fair - Poor Built-in Cabinetry and Storage Fair - Poor

Building Systems Item Description Condition Mechanical Forced Heat & Air Fair - Poor Louvers / Vents Wood & Metal Exterior Poor (or Missing) Electrical Primary Service Average Electrical Services Panel Fair Plumbing Water Service & Sanitary Unknown Water Heater Tank Fair Gas Primary Gas Service Average

Page 17 of 25Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee Review 4 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis Cost Analysis

Cost to Repair Existing Structure * 4,864 sf x $125 = $608,000.00 **

Cost to Build a New Structure of Equal Size & Quality 4,864 sf x $155* = $753,920.00 ***

* The existing structure does not meet zoning, code or program requirements for the intended use; repair / renovation is not recommended. ** Assumed renovation construction costs based on a cost per square foot method, excludes all soft costs. *** Assumed new construction costs based on a cost per square foot method, excludes all soft costs.

Assessment Rating System Excellent new or like new Good functional, light wear or reconditioned quality Average functional, moderate but acceptable wear and quality Fair somewhat functional, needs reconditioned or replacement Poor failed, non-functional, replacement needed

Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee ReviewPage 18 of 25 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis 5 Page 19 of 25Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee Review 6 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee ReviewPage 20 of 25 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis 7 Page 21 of 25Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee Review 8 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee ReviewPage 22 of 25 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis 9 Page 23 of 25Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee Review 10 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis Penn House Redevelopment - Historic Resources Committee ReviewPage 24 of 25 Existing Structure Assessment & Cost Analysis 11 Page 25 of 25