Tornado Saves Capital (And Steals Anchor for Museum!) Blog Post by Jeanne Willoz-Egnor, Published August 19, 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tornado Saves Capital (And Steals Anchor for Museum!) Blog Post by Jeanne Willoz-Egnor, Published August 19, 2019 Tornado Saves Capital (and Steals Anchor for Museum!) Blog post by Jeanne Willoz-Egnor, published August 19, 2019 Recently I had the pleasure of giving a behind the scenes tour to attendees of the annual conference of the National Society Children of 1812 (if you follow me on Facebook you might remember they gave us $1850 towards the conservation of a watercolor in the collection). While planning the tour, I decided to include one of the anchors in our collection because it had a great War of 1812 provenance. Kedge anchor, HMS Dictator (Accession# DA75) The anchor, a large Old Plan kedge anchor, had been recovered from the bottom of the Patuxent River near Point Patience, Maryland in 1959 by US Navy divers from the Naval Ordnance Laboratory Test Facility. Luckily, despite spending 145 years underwater, the anchor was in fairly pristine condition and retained many of its identifying marks. Map showing location of anchor's recovery. Shortly after recovery when it has been washed to remove thick layers of mud. When recovered the anchor ring was still overlaid with rope covered in pitched canvas. Unfortunately, when the fragile organic materials were exposed to the air and drying they quickly disintegrated. Besides a number of broad arrows (indicating British government ownership), the letters “Rec Chat” (showing the anchor was received at Chatham Dockyard after being made by an outside contractor), and “No. 6225” (the number of the anchor); the stock and shaft were marked with the numbers “6 x 3 x 24” (the weight of the anchor, 780lbs) and most importantly, the word “dictator.” Ship name and anchor weight Broad arrow on shaft Anchor's number Anchor's weight Research conducted by the National Maritime Museum at Greenwich, the Smithsonian, and the Mariners’ Museum determined that there has only been one HMS Dictator in the Royal Navy; a 3rd rate, 64-gun ship-of-the-line launched at Limehouse in 1783. In 1798 Dictator was converted into a troop ship and served throughout the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. She saw a lot of action during the Gunboat War (1807-1814) and most importantly, had carried British troops into the Chesapeake Bay in the summer of 1814. Plan showing the body plan, sheer lines with inboard detail, and longitudinal half-breadth for Dictator (1783). The plan may represent her as built in 1783. Collection of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich (Object ID ZAZ1440) One of the things I noticed while working on my talking points was that everyone said they didn’t know why Dictator’s anchor had been abandoned at the bottom of the Patuxent River. Well, you know me! Ever the curious sort, I started researching the movements of the Royal Navy in the Chesapeake Bay in 1814 to try and discover a possible reason for the loss and as usual it turned out to be a very interesting story! First, let’s set the stage. When the United States declared war on June 18, 1812, Great Britain was embroiled in the Napoleonic Wars (which had been going on since 1803). Knowing the British government’s attention was aimed somewhere else, many American politicians assumed the British would immediately make concessions and stop restricting American trade and impressing American sailors. Um, excuse me? We freaking declared war! Did those guys even bother to stop and THINK about the country they had declared war on? The British regularly and successfully fought wars on many fronts--sometimes without any allies and with what seemed like the entire world against them. If you declare war, fighting is a given but with luck it’s short- lived. Following the defeat of the French and Spanish fleets at the 1805 Battle of Trafalgar Great Britain pretty much ruled the seas. (Accession#QO800) The smarter men in our government immediately began making battle plans. Since it was doubtful the tiny United States Navy could effectively compete with the powerful, and seemingly invincible Royal Navy, Canada became the target—invade and conquer Canada and the British would have to accede to our demands. Right? As you would expect, this left the people along the Atlantic coast and Chesapeake Bay fairly unprotected. Before the fighting even ended in Europe (late 1813), the British government had turned its full attention onto the United States. In an effort to divert American troops away from Canada, the British admiral commanding the North American Station, Sir John Borlase Warren, established a blockade of the Chesapeake Bay and ordered his ships to make raids along the Atlantic and Southern coasts. When this tactic didn’t work, the new commander, Vice Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane, gave Rear Admiral George Cockburn (the guy who had been harassing the residents of the Bay since March of 1813) a new directive: “act with the utmost hostility against the shores of the United States.” Taking his orders to heart, Cockburn began threatening, plundering, pillaging and burning his way through the towns and villages around the Bay. Admiral Cockburn and the British burning & plundering Havre de Grace, Maryland. Collection of the Maryland Historical Society Portrait of Rear Admiral George Cockburn (pronounced “Co-burn”), the most hated man in the Chesapeake Bay. James O. Boyle of Pughtown, Virginia even offered a reward of one thousand dollars for the head of “the notorious incendiary and infamous scoundrel, and violator all laws, human and divine, the British admiral Cockburn—or five hundred dollars for each of his ears, on delivery.” (Collection of National Maritime Museum, Greenwich. Object id: BHC2619) It’s at this point that HMS Dictator enters the fray. After carrying troops to Holland in early 1814 Dictator was sent, with many other transports, to the Garonne River in Bordeaux to embark troops of the British Army’s first division. The fleet, including the 3rd rate HMS Diamond and six frigates, then sailed to Bermuda. Arriving on July 23rd, they found eighteen ships-of-the-line including HMS Tonnant and HMS Royal Oak sitting in Murray’s Anchorage waiting for the signal to depart for the North American continent. A View of the Town of St. George, in the Bermudas, or Summer Islands, 1816 (Accession# LP 2973) As British ships and troops continued to arrive in Bermuda, Admiral Cochrane received dispatches from Admiral Cockburn recommending large scale actions on the Potomac and Patuxent rivers. Taking this recommendation to heart, Cochrane sailed for the Chesapeake Bay with about sixty ships (according to the August 27, 1814 Nile’s Weekly Register of Baltimore) and thousands of British troops. The fleet arrived in the Bay on August 2, 1814 and a short time later Cochrane split his forces sending about fifty ships, including HMS Dictator, into the Patuxent River and the remaining ten or so into the Potomac. While it was presumed the British were headed into the Patuxent to deal with the only credible threat to the total British domination of the Chesapeake Bay— Commodore Joshua Barney’s little Chesapeake Flotilla–it was just a cover, their main goal was Washington DC. Action in St. Leonard’s Creek, June 8-10, 1814. The first battle of St. Leonard Creek included five to six battles spread across three days between Barney's Chesapeake Flotilla and a large British force under Captain Robert Barrie. (Accession# QW364) My first hint of a possible cause of Dictator’s lost anchor came while reading the book Personal Narrative of Events, From 1799 to 1815 by Vice Admiral William Stanhope Lovell (known as ‘Captain Badcock’ before he changed his name!). In Chapter 15 Lovell, who was captain of the 38-gun HMS Brune, writes: Towards the middle of July and the month of August some parts of this coast are subject to tornadoes. We had one of them on the 25th of July, which obliged us, although lying at anchor in a river, to let go a second…. The storm came on from the north-west, with the greatest violence, accompanied by a few claps of thunder and vivid flashes of lightning: such was its force that, although in smooth water, the ship heeled so much over that the main-deck guns nearly touched the water; and a fine schooner of seventy tons burthen, tender to the Severn, with a long 18-pounder on board, at anchor near us, without topmasts, her sails furled and gaffs on deck, was turned bottom upwards in a moment, and one poor fellow drowned. Its fury was spent in about ten minutes, but during its continuance we saw immense trees torn up by the roots, barns blown down like card houses of children, and where the strength of the current of wind passed scarcely anything could withstand its violence. In other words, the storm was so bad the crew of Brune had to deploy a second anchor to prevent the ship from being driven ashore. Now I know what you’re thinking, “but this event occurred before HMS Dictator arrived in the Chesapeake” but Lovell continues: This circumstance was mentioned...to...Captain Napier, who commanded the Euryalus, but Charley would not believe that the force of wind could upset a schooner of seventy tons, lying at anchor with all her sails furled, with her gaffs on deck, and without even top-masts; however, on the dashing, brilliant expedition, under Sir James Gordon, up the Potomac to Alexandria, above Washington, he had an opportunity of judging for himself when (part of a tornado passing across the bows of the frigate) he saw in a moment both his bowsprit and fore-topmast broken in two, like twigs. This storm occurred after Dictator’s arrival and it affected the entire region.
Recommended publications
  • The Battle of Hampden and Its Aftermath
    Maine History Volume 43 Article 3 Number 1 Here Come the British! 1-1-2007 The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath Robert Fraser Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fraser, Robert. “The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath” Maine History 43, no. 1 (January 2007): 21-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BATTLE OF HAMPDEN AND ITS AFTERMATH BY ROBERT FRASER The successful British attack on the Penobscot Valley in fall 1814 was to annex eastern Maine to Canada, a move taken to protect the important line of communications between Halifax and Quebec. New England merchants had opposed the War of 1812, as it destroyed their interna- tional trade, and most New Englanders tried to remain neutral during the fray. At Hampden, enemy threats brought them out to defend their homes. Although Great Britain returned the area to the United States at war’s end, the occupation of the Penobscot Valley had lasting implica- tions for the District of Maine. Between 1954 and 1984 Robert Fraser was assistant curator at the Cohasset Historical Society and a consultant to other historical societies. He writes historical articles for local newspa- pers and national magazines, and has published two books on light- houses and another on local history.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom by Reaching the Wooden World: American Slaves and the British Navy During the War of 1812
    Freedom by Reaching the Wooden World: American Slaves and the British Navy during the War of 1812. Thomas Malcomson Les noirs américains qui ont échappé à l'esclavage pendant la guerre de 1812 l'ont fait en fuyant vers les navires de la marine britannique. Les historiens ont débattu de l'origine causale au sein de cette histoire, en la plaçant soit entièrement dans les mains des esclaves fugitifs ou les Britanniques. L'historiographie a mis l'accent sur l'expérience des réfugiés dans leur lieu de réinstallation définitive. Cet article réexamine la question des causes et se concentre sur la période comprise entre le premier contact des noirs américains qui ont fuit l'esclavage et la marine britannique, et le départ définitif des ex-esclaves avec les Britanniques à la fin de la guerre. L'utilisation des anciens esclaves par les Britanniques contre les Américains en tant que guides, espions, troupes armées et marins est examinée. Les variations locales en l'interaction entre les esclaves fugitifs et les Britanniques à travers le théâtre de la guerre, de la Chesapeake à la Nouvelle-Orléans, sont mises en évidence. As HMS Victorious lay at anchor in Lynnhaven Bay, off Norfolk, in the early morning hours of 10 March 1813, a boat approached from the Chesapeake shore.1 Its occupants, nine American Black men drew the attention of the sailors in the guard boat circling the 74 gun ship. The men were runaway slaves. After a cautious inspection, the guard boat’s crew towed them to the Victorious where the nine Black men climbed up the ship’s side and entered freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • British Fleet at Trafalgar
    The Napoleon Series The British Fleet at Trafalgar Van or Weather Column ViceAdmiral Vicount Nelson K.B. 12 Ships of The Line HMS Victory (100): Vice Admiral Viscount Nelson K.B. and Captain Thomas Masterman Hardy Téméraire (98): Captain Eliab Harvey HMS Neptune (98): Captain Thomas Francis Fremantle HMS Conqueror (74): Captain Israel Pellew HMS Leviathan (74): Captain Henry William Bayntun HMS Ajax (74): Lieutenant John Pilford (acting): HMS Orion (74): Captain Edward Codrington HMS Agamemnon (64): Captain Sir Edward Berry HMS Minotaur (74): Captain Charles John Moore Mansfield HMS Spartiate (74): Captain Sir Francis Laforey Bath. HMS Britannia (100): RearAdmiral The Earl of Northesk and Captain Charles Bullen HMS Africa (64): Captain Henry Digby Rear or Lee Column ViceAdmiral Cuthbert Collingwood 15 Ships of The Line HMS Royal Sovereign (100): ViceAdmiral Cuthbert Collingwood and Captain Edward Rotheram HMS Mars (74): Captain George Duff HMS Belleisle (74): Captain William Hargood HMS Tonnant (80): Captain Charles Tyler HMS Bellerophon (74): Captain John Cooke HMS Colossus (74): Captain James Nicoll Morris HMS Archille (74): Captain Richard King HMS Polyphemus (64): Captain Richard Redmill HMS Revenge (74): Captain Robert Moorsom HMS Swiftsure (74): Captain William George Rutherford HMS Defence (74): Captain George Hope HMS Thunderer (74): Lieutenant John Stockham (acting): HMS Defiance (74): Captain Philip Charles Durham HMS Prince (98): Captain Richerd Grindall HMS Dreadnought (98): Captain John Conn In Addition to The Above 4 Frigates HMS Euryalus: Captain The Honourable Henry Blackwood HMS Naiad: Captain Thomas Dundas © 1995 – 2017 The Napoleon Series HMS Phoebe: Captain The Honourable Thomas Bladen Capel HMS Sirius: Captain William Prowse 1 Schooner HMS Pickle: Lieutenant John Richards Lapenotiere 1 Cutter HMS Entreprenante: Lieutenant R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Remarkable Fine Ship'
    A REMARKABLE FINE SHIP 1 ‘A REMARKABLE FINE SHIP’ SIR JAMES YEO AND THE ST. LAWRENCE First published in THE BEAVER, February-March 1992 James Lucas Yeo was the sort of Royal Navy officer who embodied the era of Nelson and Trafalgar. He joined the navy before he reached his eleventh birthday and by 1797, not long after his fourteenth birthday, he was a lieutenant. Yeo quickly proved to be a capable officer of initiative and daring. He was first lieutenant of the 46-gun Loire in June 1805 when the ship made an attack on the fortified Spanish port at Muros Bay. A harbour battery garrisoned by 250 men and armed with twelve cannon had the Loire under fire. Yeo led a shore party of fifty in a dramatic charge that carried the battery. Among the resulting prizes was the French privateer Confiance, of which Yeo was immediately given command. He was made a post-captain two years later as a result of his part in the evacuation of the Portuguese royal family to Brazil in the face of a French invasion of Portugal. His action at Muros Bay was repeated, on a larger scale, when he led an Anglo-Portuguese force of some 400 men and a few heavy guns against a strongly fortified garrison of 1,200 men with over 200 guns at Cayenne in French Guiana. The resulting expulsion of the French from South America led to James Yeo’s becoming the first Protestant awarded a knight commander’s cross of the Portuguese order of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nelson Collection Factsheet 2
    The Nelson Collection factsheet 2 The Nelson Collection is a display of prized artefacts, letters and valuable silverware from an important period in history. It vividly recalls the exciting times following the Revolution, and a series of brilliant naval victories, ending with Trafalgar. Lord Nelson & Lloyd’s The Nelson Collection at Lloyd’s vividly recalls the long war with France following the French Revolution, and the brilliant series of naval victories ending with Trafalgar. It is also a reminder that this was a relatively dramatic era for Lloyd’s. From a disorganised coffee house, the Society had emerged as a powerful fraternity of underwriters who were playing a leading part in supporting the nation’s war efforts. Lloyd’s links with Horatio Nelson date from the first of his great victories, the Battle of the Nile, 1798. A fund of over £38,000 was raised at Lloyd’s to relieve the suffering of the wounded and bereaved. The fund’s management committee under the great John Julius Angerstein, also voted Nelson £500 ‘...to be laid out in plate in such a manner as you will be pleased to direct, as a small token of their gratitude...’ Nelson’s ‘Nile Dinner Service’ was later augmented with a similar gift from the Lloyd’s fund raised after the Battle of Copenhagen in 1801. These silver dinner services formed the nucleus of the Nelson Collection. Vice Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson KB The son of a Norfolk rector, Horatio Nelson was born at Burnham Thorpe on 29th September 1758. When he was 12 years old he joined the Royal Navy and three years later was on an expedition to the Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Broadaxe
    THE BROADAXE NEWSLETTER of THE SHIP MODEL SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY Founded in 1981 Volume 29, Number 8 August, 2011 10th, at his home in Colts Neck. There will be a MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING charge of $10 a head to defray the cost of catering, August 25, 2011 which will be significantly more, and will be paid from the club's funds. Tom printed up and handed out directions to his home. All are welcome. The meeting was called to order by club vice- president Tom McGowan at 7:35. There were 24 members and two young guests (Jack Manville, Tom’s grandson and David Rudd, Barry’s grandson) in attendance. OLD BUSINESS Ed Hegstetter inquired about the possibility of buying vests with our club logo embroidered on the front from the same company that produced our club hats…. which reminded Tom Ruggiero, that we still have about 20 hats from our original order available. Come on guys, two chickens in every pot, and two hats on every head. Tom will bring in the catalog to the next meeting and we can discuss further purchases. (sorry Jack, we didn’t get a photo of you…next time) The minutes of the July meeting as presented in the Broadaxe were approved. Al Geigel presented the treasurer's report. Our finances remain healthy, though our bank balance has been declining recently, due in part to payment of the $500 deposit needed for next year’s joint club's conference. We also anticipate a further Members were reminded that the Morris County expense incurred by the catering for our 30th library show will be set up on Thursday, August 25 anniversary picnic.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. the Influence of the War of 1812 on Great
    ABSTRACT Nadine Kopp. The Influence of the War of 1812 on Great Lakes Shipbuilding. (Under the Direction of Dr. Bradley Rodgers) Department of History, January 2012. The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the War of 1812 influenced ship construction techniques on the Great Lakes. During the War of 1812, much of the fighting in the North American theater of war primarily took place along the Niagara frontier and later along the St. Lawrence River. From the outset, both the Americans and British realized that gaining the upper hand in the conflict depended upon control of the Great Lakes. Critical to achieving the advantage was the development of a significant and powerful inland navy, which led to a shipbuilding race on both shores. The primary question raised surrounding Great Lakes ship construction in the early nineteenth century is whether or not this large scale event, the War of 1812, permanently influenced the way in which ships were constructed once the war was over. To answer this question, this study examines diagnostic attributes of archaeologically examined wrecks from the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain from before, during and after the War of 1812 to find similarities and difference in their design and construction The three time periods have been defined as the period before the War of 1812, from the French and Indian War (1754 to 1763), when British sailing ships first appeared on the Great Lakes, up to 1811; the period of the War of 1812 itself (1812-1814); and the period after the war leading up to the opening of the Welland Canal (1829) and the widespread use of steam engines on the Great Lakes (1830s-1840s).
    [Show full text]
  • Kingsbridge, Salcombe and the South Hams During the French
    Kingsbridge, Salcombe and the South Hams during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars 1793-1815 Roger Barrett Kingsbridge Estuary U3A History Group, April 2021 Revolutionary France’s declaration of war against Britain in 1793 ushered in a generation of global conflict that finally ended with the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte’s exile to St Helena in 1815. The South Hams played a small but not insignificant part in these long wars. The area provided grain to feed a hungry nation, men to defend its shores and was the scene of both first and the last naval events in home waters: the Battle of Prawle Point in 1793 and, in 1815, the transfer of Napoleon to the ship that would take him into exile. Kingsbridge, Salcombe and Dartmouth in the late 1790s At the close of the eighteenth century, Kingsbridge was a thriving market town at the centre of a rich grain-growing district. According to Richard Polwhele in 1793, Kingsbridge was one of the chief corn markets of the county and more corn was shipped from there than ‘from any other port in Devon Shire’.1 In 1801, the town (with its neighbour Dodbrooke) had a population of 1700 and was noted for its production of woollen cloth used in the manufacture of army uniforms, as well as rope for naval use. The Quaker’s, Walter Prideaux & John Roope, began the manufacture of serge cloth in 1798 when they converted Town Mill, formerly the corn mill, in Mill Street. Cloth was also weaved in Lavers’ mill in Duncombe Street.2 Rope for ships was made in Bonker’s ropewalk in Western backway and, in 1804, Kingsbridge made a further contribution to the war effort when an army barracks for over 600 men was built on the Warren to the south of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Tourists, Colonial Subjects and the Making of a British World, 1860–1911
    THE MAKING OF A STUDIES IN IMPERIALISM TOU ROYAL GENERAL EDITOR: Andrew S. Thompson FOUNDING EDITOR: John M. MacKenzie ROYAL TOURISTS, COLONIAL ROYAL TOURISTS, SUBJECTS AND THE MAKING OF A BRITISH WORLD, 1860–1911 COLONIAL SUBJECTS This book examines the ritual space of nineteenth-century royal tours of empire and the diverse array of historical actors who R AND THE MAKING participated in them. It is a tale of royals who were ambivalent and ISTS, COLONIAL SUBJECTS AND ISTS, COLONIAL bored partners in the project of empire; colonial administrators who used royal ceremonies to pursue a multiplicity of projects and interests or to imagine themselves as African chiefs or heirs to the Mughal OF A BRITISH WORLD, BR emperors; local princes and chiefs who were bullied and bruised by the politics of the royal tour, even as some of them used the tour to ITISH WO symbolically appropriate or resist British cultural power; and settlers 1860–1911 of European descent and people of colour in the empire who made claims on the rights and responsibilities of imperial citizenship and as co-owners of Britain’s global empire. Royal tourists, colonial subjects and the making of a British world suggests that the diverse responses to the royal tours of the nineteenth century demonstrate how a multi- centred British imperial culture was forged in the empire and was R LD, 1860–1911 constantly made and remade, appropriated and contested. In this context, subjects of empire provincialised the British Isles, centring the colonies in their political and cultural constructions of empire, Britishness, citizenship, and loyalty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butcher's Bill an Accounting of Wounds, Illness, Deaths, and Other Milestones Aubrey-Maturin Sea Novels of Patrick O'br
    The Butcher’s Bill an accounting of wounds, illness, deaths, and other milestones in the Aubrey-Maturin sea novels of Patrick O’Brian by Michael R. Schuyler [email protected] Copyright © Michael R. Schuyler 2006 All rights reserved Page: 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Combined Table of Ship and Book Abbreviations ...................................................... 9 Table of Commissions..................................................................................................... 9 Master & Commander ................................................................................................. 10 Table 1-1: Butcher’s Bill for Master & Commander .............................................. 18 Table 1-2: Crew of HMS Sophie .............................................................................. 20 Table 1-3: Met or mentioned elsewhere................................................................. 23 Post Captain .................................................................................................................. 24 Table 2-1: Butcher’s Bill for Post Captain .............................................................. 32 Table 2-2: Passengers and crew of Lord Nelson.................................................. 32 Table 2-3: Crew of HMS Polychrest........................................................................ 33 Table 2-4: Crew of HMS Lively ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medals, Banknotes and Coins and Banknotes Medals
    Wednesday 23 November 2016 Wednesday Knightsbridge, London MEDALS, BANKNOTES AND COINS MEDALS, BANKNOTES AND COINS | Knightsbridge, London | Wednesday 23 November 2016 23563 MEDALS, BANKNOTES AND COINS Wednesday 23 November 2016 at 10am Knightsbridge, London BONHAMS ENQUIRIES IMPORTANT INFORMATION Montpelier Street John Millensted The United States Government Knightsbridge + 44 (0) 20 7393 3914 has banned the import of ivory London SW7 1HH [email protected] into the USA. Lots containing www.bonhams.com ivory are indicated by the symbol Fulvia Esposito Ф printed beside the lot number VIEWING + 44 (0) 20 7393 3917 in this catalogue. Monday 21 November 2016 [email protected] 9am – 4.30pm Tuesday 22 November 2016 PRESS ENQUIRIES 9am – 4pm [email protected] BIDS CUSTOMER SERVICES +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 Monday to Friday +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax 8.30am – 6pm To bid via the internet +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 please visit www.bonhams.com SALE NUMBER: Please note that bids should be 23563 submitted no later than 24 hours prior to the sale. CATALOGUE: £15 New bidders must also provide proof of identity when submitting LIVE ONLINE BIDDING IS bids. Failure to do this may result AVAILABLE FOR THIS SALE in your bids not being processed. Please email [email protected] Bidding by telephone will only be with “Live bidding” in the subject accepted on a lot with the excess line 48 hours before the auction of £500. to register for this service. Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams International Board Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No. 4326560 Robert
    [Show full text]