Arxiv:2010.06951V2 [Math.FA] 14 Dec 2020

arXiv:2010.06951v2 [math.FA] 14 Dec 2020 hc sdfie by defined is which naayi efmpof self-map analytic an s h notation the use of y[ By hs yteShazLma every Lemma, Schwarz the by Thus, fcmoiinoeaoso ooopi ucinsae.Also, spaces. function holomorphic on operators composition of h opsto prtr eeae yds uoopim r b are automorphisms disk by generated operators composition the pc fbuddfntosin functions bounded of space ega space Bergman For hogotti paper, this Throughout Let elkonfc sthat is fact well-known A osdrtecniuu function continuous the Consider OEAPIAIN FITROAIGSQECSFOR SEQUENCES INTERPOLATING OF APPLICATIONS SOME H ii lim (iii) i)i aifisteLsycniin inf condition; Lusky the satisfies it (iv) i)i sdecreasing, is it (ii) i ti ail htis, that radial, is it (i) p 5 ν ∞ . rpris at(v] o every for (iv)], Part Properties, 1.2 , = ( H egtdBrmnsaeo nnt order. infinite of space Bergman weighted Keywords: MSC(2010): ergod spaces. mean these (uniformly) on the operators for conditions sufficient and necessary H Abstract. [ D 17 ∞ ( ν ∞ uhthat such ) D hrceie h uiomy enegdccmoiinoperato composition ergodic mean (uniformly) the characterized ] ( | h egtdBrmnsaeo nnt re sdfie as: defined is order infinite of space Bergman weighted the , z D etesaeo l nltcfntoso h pnui disk unit open the on functions analytic all of space the be ) |→ ,rsetvl.I hsppr yuigteitroaigsequence interpolating the using by paper, this In respectively. ), AAHSAE FAAYI FUNCTIONS ANALYTIC OF SPACES BANACH 1 ν A A ( H z ν p ν p .J etńMnu ta.[ al. Beltrán-Meneua et J. M. nepltn eune,ma roi prtr,cmoiinop composition operators, ergodic mean sequences, interpolating and 0 = ) ( ( α ∞ D rmr:47 primary: D C f ( stesaeo nltcfunctions analytic of space the is ) = ) ϕ ν ˜ D z f ( ( o h space the for ) z z ν D = = ) 1 = ) H h map The . a h olwn properties: following the has ν f ν ∞ k ( ν f ◦ z sup ( B D / = ) k ≃ H ϕ ν 3 eodr:47 secondary: 33, ˜ ν,p p = ) AZHKESHAVARZI HAMZEH erfrt [ to refer We . ( ( {| ν ˜ z D where , ν = 1. f .Bnte l [ al. et Bonet ). ihspeu norm. supremum with ) ( { ( | z Z f ν z Introduction ) C z | ϕ H | )), ∈ ∈ : ϕ D : ν ∞ nue opsto operator composition a induces D H | sbuddon bounded is f n f ( z 1 ( D 2 → ( ν D ∈ n .Jr´ n .Rodr´ıguez-Arenas A. Jordá and E. and ] ∈ z (1 ν ihteweight the with ) ) (1 sup : ) 1 B − H 13 | D (0 − p 2 8 47 38; ν ν − ∞ 2 , , hr safunction a is there − ( z n ∞ ( 21 ∈ z − n 7 D D ) ) 1 hwdta o uhweighted such for that showed ] .Fr0 For ). ) o aiu set ftetheory the of aspects various for ] ) A < | , f > 35. k ( ∞ f z f 0 H ≤ k ) . . | on ν ν ∞ ( ( z 1 D D < p < ) } ct fcomposition of icity ν .Consider ). < . where ( H son rs z ∞} (1 = ) ,w ieother give we s, ∞ uddon ounded f ( D H ∞ z . steBanach the is ) ∞ nteui ball unit the in h weighted the , ( erators, | − D C D and ) ϕ Let . z > α | on ) H α . ν ∞ H ;we 0; ϕ ( ( D D be ν ). ) , 2 HAMZEH KESHAVARZI

Let {ak} be a discrete sequence of points in D. If it is the case that for any bounded sequence of complex number {bk}, one can ﬁnd a bounded analytic function, f, in D, such that

f(ak)= bk, k =1, 2, ...,

∞ we say that {ak} is an interpolating sequence for H (D). Nevannlina [20] gave a necessary and suﬃcient condition for a sequence to be an interpolation sequence in H∞(D). Carleson [11] with a simpler condition presented another characterization for these sequences in H∞(D). Using interpolation sequences, Carleson solved the corona conjecture on H∞(D) in his celebrated paper [12]. Berndtsson [4] gave a suﬃcient ∞ condition for H (Bn)-interpolating sequences. Consider the sequence

1 n M (T )= T j, n n Xj=1 where T j is the j − th iteration of continuous operator T on the Banach space X. We say that T is mean ergodic if Mn(T ) converges to a bounded operator acting on X, in the strong operator topology. Also, T is called uniformly mean ergodic if Mn(T ) converges in the operator norm. M. J. Beltrán-Meneua et al. [2] and E. Jordáand A. Rodr´ıguez-Arenas [17] characterized the (uniformly) mean ergodic composition op- ∞ D ∞ D erators on H ( ) and Hν ( ), respectively. In this paper, by using the interpolating sequences, we give other necessary and sufficient conditions for the (uniformly) mean ergodicity of composition operators on these spaces. It is well-known that H∞(D) is a Grothendieck Dunford-Pettis (GDP) space. Lusky ∞ D ∞ D ∞ ∞ D [19], showed that Hν ( ) is isomorphic either to a H ( ) or to a l . Hence, Hν ( ) also is a GDP space. Lotz [18] proved that if X is a GDP space and in addition kT n/nk→ 0, then T is mean ergodic if and only if it is uniformly mean ergodic. M. J. Beltrán-Meneua et al. [2] used the above results to characterize (uniformly) mean ergodic composition operators on H∞(D). Indeed, according to the result of Lotz, the mean ergodicity and uniformly mean ergodicity of composition operators on H∞(D) are equivalent. Also, they gave another equivalent geometric condition with the mean ergodicity of composition operators. In this paper, we give another equivalent condition: ∞ D 1 n we show that Cϕ on H ( ) is mean ergodic if and only if limn→∞ k n j=1 Cϕj ke = 0, where k.ke denotes the essential norm of operators. March T. BoedihardjoP and William B. Johnson [6] investigated the mean ergodicity of operators in Calkin algebra. E. Jordáand A. Rodr´ıguez-Arenas [17] characterized the (uniformly) mean ergodic ∞ D composition operators on Hν ( ). Also, they showed that if Cϕ is mean ergodic then ϕ has an interior Denjoy-Wolff point. In this paper, we give another geometric necessary and sufficient conditions for the (uniformly) mean ergodic composition operators on ∞ D Hν ( ), when ϕ has an interior Denjoy-Wolff point. Also, we show that if ϕ is not an ∞ D elliptic disk automorphism, then Cϕ is uniformly mean ergodic on Hα ( ) if and only ∞ D if Mn(Cϕ) converges to 0 in Calkin algebra of Hα ( ). Throughout the paper, we write A . B when there is a positive constant C such that A ≤ CB, and A ≃ B when A . B and B . A. SOME APPLICATIONS OF INTERPOLATING SEQUENCES 3

2. Main Results Let ϕ be an analytic self-map of the unit disk. The point in the following theorem is called the Denjoy-Wolff point of ϕ. Theorem 2.1 (Denjoy-Wolff Theorem). If ϕ, which is neither the identity nor an elliptic automorphism of D, is an analytic map of the unit disk into itself, then there is a point w in D so that ϕj → w, uniformly on the compact subsets of D. If ϕ has an interior Denjoy-Wolff point, then we can conjugate it with an analytic self-map of D that fixes the origin. Hence, if ϕ has an interior Denjoy-Wolff point, we investigate only the case ϕ(0) = 0. Theorem 2.2. Consider ϕ : D → D analytic with ϕ(0) = 0, which is neither the identity nor an elliptic automorphism of D. Then the following statements are equivalent: ∞ D (i) Cϕ is mean ergodic on Hν ( ). ∞ D (ii) Cϕ is uniformly mean ergodic on Hν ( ). (iii) For some (every) sequence (rn) ∈ (0, 1) where rn ↑ 1, ν(z) (2.1) lim sup =0. n→∞ |z|>rn ν(ϕn(z))

Moreover, if supz∈D ν(z) ≤ 1, then (iv) We have ν(z) (2.2) lim sup |ϕn(z)| =0. n→∞ |z|<1 ν(ϕn(z)) ∞ D Proof. (i)⇔ (ii): If f is in the unit ball of Hν ( ), then 1 |f(z)| ≤ , ∀z ∈ D. ν(z) Thus, by using the monotonicity of ν and the Schwarz lemma ν(z) |f(ϕn(z))|ν(z) ≤ ≤ 1, ∀z ∈ D. ν(ϕn(z))

Hence, kCϕn /nk→ 0. Therefore, from [18] it follows that (i) and (ii) are equivalent.

(ii)⇒(iii). Consider the sequence (rn) ∈ (0, 1) where rn ↑ 1 and 2.1 does not hold. Since for any z ∈ D the sequence {|ϕi(z)|} is decreasing, there are an r > 0 and a sequence {an} ⊂ D where |an|→ 1 and ν(a ) n ≥ r. ν(ϕn(an))

ν(an) ν(an) ≥ ≥ r, |ϕi(an)|≥|ϕn(an)| ≥ s. ν(ϕi(an)) ν(ϕn(an)) n Hence, by the proof of [14, Lemma 13], for every n, {ϕi(an)}i=1 is an interpolation. n ∞ D Thus, by [4, Page 3] there is some M > 0 and {fi,n}i=1 in H ( ) such that 4 HAMZEH KESHAVARZI

(a) fi,n(ϕi(an)) =1 and fi,n(ϕj(an)) = 0, for i =6 j. n N (b) supz∈D i=1 |fi,n(z)| ≤ M, for all n ∈ . Now we deﬁneP the functions

fn(z)= zϕi(an)fi,n(z)fϕi(an)(z). Xi=1

α We can easily see that supz∈D |fn(z)|(1 −|z|) ≤ M, fn(0) = 0 and

2 |ϕi(an)| fn(ϕi(an)) = . ν˜(ϕi(an)) Therefore,

1 n 1 n ν(a ) f (ϕ (a ))ν(a |)= n |ϕ (a )|2 & s2r. n n i n n n ν˜(ϕ (a )) i n Xi=1 Xi=1 i n

But this is a contradiction with the uniformly mean ergodicity of Cϕ.

(iii)⇒(i). Let {rn} be a sequence in (0, 1) such that rn ↑ 1 and 2.1 holds. Consider ε> 0 arbitrary. By using 2.1, there exists some N such that

ν(|z|) sup < ε. |z|>rN ν(|ϕN (z)|)

Now by the Schwarz lemma

ν(|z|) sup < ε, ∀n ≥ N. |z|>rN ν(|ϕn(z)|)

∞ D Let f be in the unit ball of Hν ( ). Then

1 n 1 n sup |f ◦ ϕ (z) − f(0)|ν(|z|) = sup |f ◦ ϕ (z) − f(0)|ν(|z|) n i n i |z|<1 Xi=1 |z|≤rN Xi=1 1 n + sup |f ◦ ϕ (z) − f(0)|ν(|z|). n i |z|>rN Xi=1

Since ϕi → 0 uniformly on |z| ≤ rN , we have

1 n lim sup |f ◦ ϕi(z) − f(0)|ν(|z|)=0. n→∞ n |z|≤rN Xi=1

Now for |z| >rN : We know that 1 |f ◦ ϕi(z) − f(0)| . , ν(|ϕi(z)|) SOME APPLICATIONS OF INTERPOLATING SEQUENCES 5 thus, for |z| >rN and n ≥ N,

1 n 1 n ν(|z|) |f ◦ ϕ (z) − f(0)|ν(|z|) . n i n ν(|ϕ (z)|) Xi=1 Xi=1 i 1 N ν(|z|) n ν(|z|) = + n ν(|ϕi(z)|) ν(|ϕi(z)|) h Xi=1 i=XN+1 i N n − N ≤ + ε. n n

N Taking n as suﬃciently large, we have n <ε. Since ε> 0 was arbitrary, (ii) holds.

(iii)⇒(iv): Consider ε> 0 arbitrary. By using 2.1, there exists some N such that

ν(z) sup < ε. |z|>rN ν(ϕN (z))

Now by the Schwarz lemma

ν(z) sup |ϕn(z)| < ε, ∀n ≥ N. |z|>rN ν(ϕn(z))

Also, Since ϕi → 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D, there exists some M such that

ν(z) sup |ϕn(z)| ≤ sup |ϕn(z)| < ε, ∀n ≥ M. |z|≤rN ν(ϕn(z)) |z|≤rN

Therefore, for n ≥ max{M, N}

ν(z) sup |ϕn(z)| < ε. |z|<1 ν(ϕn(z))

This gives the desire result.

(iv)⇒(ii): From the proof of [10, Proposition 2], we can conclude that

ν(z) kCϕi − K0k ≃ sup max{ , ν(z)}|ϕi(z)|. |z|<1 ν˜(ϕi(z))

D ∞ D Since supz∈D ν(z) ≤ 1, for every z ∈ there is some gz in the unit ball of Hν ( ) where |gz(z)| ≥ 1. Thus,

1 = sup{|f(z)| : f ∈ H∞(D), kfk ≤ 1} ≥ 1, ν˜(z) ν 6 HAMZEH KESHAVARZI for all z ∈ D. Therefore, 1 n 1 n k C − K k ≤ kC − K k n ϕi 0 n ϕi 0 Xi=1 Xi=1 1 n ν(z) ≃ sup max{ , ν(z)}|ϕ (z)| n ν˜(ϕ (z)) i Xi=1 |z|<1 i 1 n ν(z) ≤ sup |ϕ (z)| n ν˜(ϕ (z)) i Xi=1 |z|<1 i 1 n ν(z) . sup |ϕ (z)|→ 0. n ν(ϕ (z)) i Xi=1 |z|<1 i as n →∞. Inequality 2.1 implies the following examples.

k Example 2.3. Let α> 0 and k be a positive integer. If ϕ(z)= z , then Cϕ is uniformly ∞ D 1 mean ergodic on every Hα ( ). In fact, if rn =1 − kn , then 2.1 holds: 1 −|z| 1 −|z| 1 − r lim sup = lim sup n = lim sup n n→∞ n→∞ k n→∞ k |z|>rn 1 −|ϕn(z)| |z|>rn 1 −|z| r>rn 1 − r 1 − (1 − 1 ) 1 = lim kn ≤ lim kn n→∞ 1 kn n→∞ 1 kn 1 − (1 − kn ) 1 − (1 − kn ) 1 limn→∞ n = k =0. 1 − e−1 Example 2.4. If ϕ : D → D does not have a ﬁnite angular derivative at any point of ∞ D the boundary, then Cϕ is uniformly mean ergodic on Hα ( ). Indeed 1 −|z| 1 −|z| lim sup ≤ lim sup =0. n→∞ |z|>rn 1 −|ϕn(z)| |z|→1 1 −|ϕ(z)| ∞ D ∞ D In Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 we will use of this fact that: Let X = H ( ) or Hν ( ). If {fn} ⊂ X is a sequence which converges to 0, uniformly on compact subsets of D, and Q : X → X is a compact operator then {Q(fn)} converges to 0 in the norm of X. Theorem 2.5. Consider α > 0 and ϕ : D → D analytic with ϕ(0) = 0, , which is neither the identity nor an elliptic automorphism of D. Then (in addition to the conditions in Theorem 2.2) another necessary and suﬃcient condition for the (uniformly) ∞ D 1 n mean ergodicity of Cϕ on Hα ( ) is that limn→∞ k n j=1 Cϕj ke =0. 1 n P Proof. Let Cϕ be uniformly mean ergodic, so n j=1 Cϕj → K0, where K0 is the point evaluation at 0. We know that K0 is a compactP operator, therefore, 1 n 1 n 1 n lim k Cϕ ke = lim k Cϕ − K0ke ≤ lim k Cϕ − K0k =0. n→∞ n j n→∞ n j n→∞ n j Xj=1 Xj=1 Xj=1 1 n Conversely, we show that Part (iii) of Theorem 2.2 holds. Let Tn = n j=1 Cϕj and ∞ D {fm} be a bounded sequence in Hα ( ), where fm converges to 0 uniformlyP on the SOME APPLICATIONS OF INTERPOLATING SEQUENCES 7 compact subsets of D. If Q is a compact operator, then

kTn + Qk & lim kTnfm + Qfmk = lim kTnfmk. m→∞ m→∞ Thus,

(2.3) lim lim kTnfmk =0. n→∞ m→∞

Let Part (iii) of Theorem 2.2 do not hold. Consider the sequence (rn) ∈ (0, 1) where n 1+1/n rn ↑ 1 and rn ↑ 1 (for example, rn = e1/n ) but 2.1 does not hold. It is suﬃces to ∞ D construct a bounded sequence {fm} in Hα ( ) where fm converges to 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D, however, 2.3 does not hold. Again there are an r > 0 and a sequence {an} ⊂ D where |an| ≥ rn and 1 −|a | n ≥ r. 1 −|ϕn(an)| Thus, n−1 j 1 −|a | (1 −|an|) |ϕn(an)| r ≤ n = j=0 P n 1 −|ϕn(an)| 1 −|ϕn(an)| n−1 j n (1 −|an|) |an| 1 −|a | ≤ j=0 = n P n n 1 −|ϕn(an)| 1 −|ϕn(an)| n n Since |an| → 1 there are some s> 0 and k ∈ N such that |ϕn(an)|≥|ϕn(an)| ≥ s, for all n ≥ k. Without loss of generality, we can let k = 1. Thus, by the Schwarz lemma for 1 ≤ i ≤ n,

1 −|an| 1 −|an| n n ≥ ≥ r, |ϕi(an)| ≥|ϕn(an)| ≥ s 1 −|ϕi(an)| 1 −|ϕn(an)| n ∞ D Similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2, there are some M > 0 and {fi,n}i=1 in H ( ) such that

(a) fi,n(ϕi(an)) =1 and fi,n(ϕj(an)) = 0, for i =6 j. n (b) supz∈D i=1 |fi,n(z)| ≤ M. Now we constructP the functions fm as follows: m m m z ϕi(am) fi,m(z) fm(z)= . α Xi=1 (1 − ϕi(am)z) α It is easily to check that supz∈D |fm(z)|(1 −|z|) ≤ M, fm converges to 0 uniformly on the compact subsets of D, and 2m |ϕi(am)| fm(ϕi(am)) = 2 α . (1 −|ϕi(am)| ) Therefore, for m ≥ n n n 1 1 1 −|a | α s2rα f (ϕ (a ))(1 −|a |)α = m |ϕ (a )|2m ≥ . n m i m m n 1 −|ϕ (a )|2 i m 2α Xi=1 Xi=1 i m Thus, Equation 2.3 does not hold and this is a contradiction. The equivalency of Parts (i), (ii), and (iii) of the following theorem has been shown in [2, Theorem 3.3]. Here we add Part (iv). 8 HAMZEH KESHAVARZI

Theorem 2.6. Consider ϕ : D → D analytic with ϕ(0) = 0, , which is neither the identity nor an elliptic automorphism of D. Then the following statements are equivalent: ∞ (i) Cϕ is mean ergodic on H (D). ∞ (ii) Cϕ is uniformly mean ergodic on H (D). (iii) limn→∞ kϕnk∞ =0. 1 n (iv) limn→∞ k n j=1 Cϕj ke =0. P 1 n ∞ D Proof. Let Tn = n j=1 Cϕj and {fm} be a bounded sequence in H ( ), where fm converges to 0 uniformlyP on the compact subsets of D. Again, we must have

(2.4) lim lim kTnfmk∞ =0, n→∞ m→∞

Let kϕnk∞ 9 0, so kϕnk∞ = 1, for all n. We construct a bounded sequence {fm} in ∞ H (D) where fm converges to 0 uniformly on the compact subsets of D, but 2.4 does 2n not hold. There is some r > 0 and {an} ⊂ D such that |ϕn(an)| > r. Hence, by the Schwarz lemma 2n |ϕj(an)| > r and |ϕj(an)| > r, 1 ≤ j ≤ n. ∞ Thus, there is a bounded sequence {gm} in H (D) where m gm(ϕi(am)) = ϕi(am) , 1 ≤ j ≤ m. m ∞ Consider the functions fm(z)= z gm(z). Thus, {fm} is a bounded sequence in H (D) which converges to 0 uniformly on the compact subsets of D. Also, for m ≥ n 1 n 1 n (2.5) f (ϕ (a )) = |ϕ (a )|2m ≥ r. n m i m n i m Xi=1 Xi=1 This is a contradiction.

Boundary Denjoy-Wolff point. In [2, Theorem 3.6] and [17, Theorem 3.8], it has shown that if ϕ has boundary Denjoy-Wolff point, then Cϕ is not mean ergodic on ∞ D ∞ D H ( ) and Hν ( ), respectively. Disk automorphisms. Let ϕ be an automorphism of the disk. If ϕ has a boundary Denjoy-Wolff point then by using the preceding part, Cϕ failed to be mean ergodic on ∞ D ∞ D D H ( ) and Hν ( ). If ϕ is an elliptic disk automorphism, then there are some λ ∈ ∂ and some disk automorphism ψ such that ψ ◦ ϕ ◦ ψ−1(z)= λz. In this case, Equation 2.1 does not hold. But [22, Proposition 18] and [17, Theorem 3.8] imply that: Cϕ is ∞ D (uniformly) mean ergodic on Hν ( ) if and only if λ is a root of 1. Also, [2, Theorem 2.2] gives a similar result on H∞(D).

References

[1] Basallote, M., Contreras, M. D., Hernández-Mancera, C., Mart´ınM. J., Paúl, P. J.: Volterra operators and semigroups in weighted Banach spaces of analytic functions, Collectanea Mathematica, 2014, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp 233–249. [2] Beltrán-Meneua,M. J., Gómez-Collado, M.C., Jordá, E., Jornet, D.: Mean ergodic composition operators on Banach spaces of holomorphic functions, Journal of Functional Analysis 270 (2016) 4369–4385. SOME APPLICATIONS OF INTERPOLATING SEQUENCES 9

[3] Beltrán-Meneua,M. J., Gómez-Collado, M.C., Jordá, E., Jornet, D.: Mean ergodicity of weighted composition operators on spaces of holomorphic functions, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 444, 2 (2016) 1640-1651. [4] Berndtsson B.: Interpolating sequences for H∞ in the ball, Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceed- ings) Volume 88, Issue 1, 25 March 1985, Pages 1-10 [5] Bierstedt, K.D., Bonet, J., Taskinen, J.: Associated weights and spaces of holomorphic functions, Studia Math. 127 (1998), 137-168 [6] Boedihardjo, M. T., Johnson, W. B.: On mean ergodic convergence in the Calkin algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), 2451-2457. [7] Bonet, J, Domański, P., Lindström, M.: Jari Taskinen, Composition operators between weighted Banach spaces of analytic functions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 64 Issue 1 (1998) 101-118 [8] Bonet, J, Domański, P.: Power bounded composition operators on spaces of analytic functions, Collect. Math. 62 (2011) 69–83 [9] Bonet, J, Domański, P.: A note on mean ergodic composition operators on spaces of holomorphic functions, RACSAM 105 (2011) 389–396. [10] Bonet, J., Lindström, M., Wolf, E.: Differences of composition operators between weighted Banach spaces of holomorphic functions, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society 84 May 2008, 9-20. [11] Carleson, L.: An Interpolation Problem for Bounded Analytic Functions, American Journal of Mathematics Vol. 80, No. 4 (Oct., 1958), pp. 921-930. [12] Carleson, L.: Interpolations by Bounded Analytic Functions and the Corona Problem, Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol. 76, No. 3 (Nov., 1962), pp. 547-559. [13] Cowen, C.C., MacCluer, B.D.: Composition Operators on Spaces of Analytic Functions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995. [14] Cowen, C.C., MacCluer, B.D.: Spectra of some composition operators, J. Funct. Anal. 125 (1994), 223–251. [15] Duren, P., Schuster, A.: Bergman Spaces, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 100, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. [16] Gómez-Colladoa, M.C., Jordá, E., Jornet, D., Power bounded composition operators on spaces of meromorphic functions, Topology and its Applications, 203 (2016) 141–146. [17] Jordá, E., Rodr´ıguez-Arenas, A.: Ergodic properties of composition operators on Banach spaces of analytic functions, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Volume 486, Issue 1, 1 June 2020, 123891. [18] Lotz, H. P.: Uniform convergence of operators on L∞ and similar spaces, Math. Z. 190 (1985), 207–220. [19] Lusky, W.: On the isomorphism classes of weighted spaces of harmonic and holomorphic functions. Studia Math. 175 (2006), no. 1, 19-45. [20] Nevanlinna, R.: ” Uber beschrankte funktionen die in gegebenen punkten vorgeschriebene werte annehmen,” Annales Academie Scientiarum Fennicae, vol. 13 (1919), No. 1. [21] Shapiro, J.H.: Composition Operator and Classical Function Theory, springer-verlag, New York, 1993. [22] Wolf, E.: Power bounded composition operators, Computational Methods and Function Theory, Volume 12 (2012), No. 1, 105–117. [23] Zhu, K.: Operator Theory in Function Space, second edition, Math. Surveys Monogr., vol. 138, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007.

Hamzeh Keshavarzi E-mail: [email protected] Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran