DOCSLIB.ORG

An Economic Analysis of the Ministry of Agriculture/Sasakawa Global 2000'S Experiment with Improved Cereals Technology in Ethiopia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Economic Analysis of the Ministry of Agriculture/Sasakawa Global 2000'S Experiment with Improved Cereals Technology in Ethiopia Can The Momentum be Sustained? An Economic Analysis of the Ministry of Agriculture/Sasakawa Global 2000's Experiment with Improved Cereals Technology in Ethiopia A Joint Research Activity of: Grain Marketing Research Project/Michigan State University Sasakawa Global 2000 Ministry of Agriculture Department of Extension and Cooperatives Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization September 1998 Funding for this research was provided by the Food Security II Cooperative Agreement (AEP- 5459-A-00-2041-00) between Michigan State University and the United States Agency for International Development, through USAID/Ethiopia and Africa Bureau's Office of Sustainable Development, Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division (AFR/SD/PSGE). CONTRIBUTORS TO THE STUDY The authors of this report are: Julie Howard*, Mulat Demeke**, Valerie Kelly*, Mywish Maredia*, and Julie Stepanek* * Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University ** Department of Economics, University of Addis Ababa Others contributing to the research are: Survey Coordinator: Ali Said Survey Supervisors: Demeke Abate Mengistu Buta Selamyihun Kidane Interviewers: Negusie Belete Tsige Alemu Yemiserach Gebeyehu Jemal A/Faji Tamrat Yigezu Masresha Getachew Afework Dubero Kebede Negusie Belayneh A/Mariam Elfnesh Dubero Aytenew Shibru Biruk Seifu Zewdu Damenu Bullo Edossa Dabeta Eticha Birbo Bissa Befekadu Tesfaye Danil Tesfaye Duresso Chimsa Sebsibe Gemechu Derbe Gudissa Muluneh Kebede Girma Mulugeta Kumelcha Bulto Aynalem Mekuria Tesfaye Midikssa Warkaye Bekele Mame Kebede Bekele Wakjira Raya Kebede Nigatu Bekele Data Entry Clerks: Abebech Demissies Senait Hundie Data Cleaning Supervisors: Margaret Beaver Tesfaye Zegeye Mulat Demeke Drivers: Asrat Gebre Workeneh Molla i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team wishes to thank the participating farmers, the Ministry of Agriculture Department of Extension and Cooperatives staff in Addis Ababa, East Shoa, West Shoa, and Jimma, and the staff of SG2000 in Ethiopia for their generous assistance during the course of the survey. GMRP staff members were also extremely helpful: Thanks go to Alemu Asfaw for his assitance with price data, to Samson Dejene for assistance with data entry and analysis, to Tigist Tesfaye for secretarial support. The researchers with the GMRP and the MSU Food Security II Project who provided encouragement and willingly shared their ideas with us on numerous survey and analysis issues are too numerous to mention individually, but Aklu Girgre, Thom Jayne, and Mike Weber deserve special mention. We would also like to thank Don Beaver for assistance in the design of plot measurement procedures and software; Rick Ward and Urs Schulthess for help in designing data collection procedures and interpreting results for the yield determinants parts of the research; and Scott Swinton and Eric Crawford for their assistance in designing the data analysis procedures and interpreting the results. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTRIBUTORS TO THE STUDY............................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.....................................................ii LIST OF TABLES ..........................................................v LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES......................................................v LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................... vi Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................1 1.1. Objectives .....................................................1 1.2. Methods.......................................................2 1.2.1. Sample Selection...........................................2 1.2.2. Questionnaire Design and Data Collection........................5 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS COMPARED TO THOSE OF TYPICAL AGRICULTURAL HOUSEHOLDS ............................... 7 3. YIELD RESULTS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ..........................10 3.1. Yield Results .................................................. 10 3.1.1. Maize..................................................10 3.1.2. Tef....................................................11 3.2. Financial Analysis...............................................12 3.2.1. Data and Methods Used....................................12 3.2.2. Improved Technology is Profitable for both Maize and Tef, Even if Output Prices Decline by 25% or 50% ...............................13 3.2.3. Gains from Storage and Use of Storage Insecticide................13 3.2.4. Improved Seed and Fertilizer Costs Represent 50-80% of Total Costs . 14 iii 4. FACTORS AFFECTING CROP YIELDS..................................18 4.1. Factors Affecting Maize Yields.....................................18 4.1.1. Types of Maize Technologies and Their Yields...................18 4.1.2. Econometric Analysis of Maize Yield Determinants ...............20 4.1.3. Descriptive Analysis of Factors Related to Maize Technology Choice . 23 4.1.4. Graduate Farmers’ Decisions Concerning Choice of Maize Technology 23 4.2. Factors Affecting Tef Yields.......................................26 4.2.1. Types of Tef Technologies and Their Yields.....................26 4.2.2. Econometric Analysis of Tef Yield Determinants..................29 4.2.3. Graduate Farmers’ Decisions Concerning Choice of Tef Technology . 32 5. MOVING FROM DEMONSTRATION PLOTS TO SUSTAINABLE INCREASES IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY .....................................34 5.1 Challenges Facing the Extension Service..............................35 5.2. Evolution of the Agricultural Input Credit System ......................35 5.3. Description of the Inputs Subsector .................................37 5.3.1. Fertilizer Market Development -- Balancing the Need for Decentralization and Competition .........................................37 5.3.2. The Seed Sector - Much Work Ahead..........................37 5.4. Key Sustainability Issues ..........................................38 6. CONCLUSIONS ....................................................40 6.1. Yield and Income Gains from the Use of Improved Technology Are High.....40 6.2. Gains from Storage Are Potentially Great, Especially If Storage Insecticide Is Used ............................................................40 6.3. Improved Seed and Fertilizer Are the Most Important Determinants of Yield ............................................................41 6.4. Key Questions: How to Sustain this Successful Program in High Surplus- producing Regions, and How to Expand it Beyond Wealthier Farmers in Better Agroecological Areas? ..........................................41 APPENDIX 1.............................................................44 APPENDIX 2.............................................................78 APPENDIX 3.............................................................89 REFERENCES............................................................96 iv LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 1 Sample Composition ...................................................4 2 Agroecological Characteristics and Recommended Technology Packages............4 3 Selected Characteristics of Participant Households Versus the Broader Population of Agricultural Households.................................................8 4 1997 Fertilizer Use of Participants Versus the Broader Agricultural Population .......9 5 Summary of Key Yield and Profitability Results by Zone, Plot Type, and Yield Tercile ..................................................................15 6 Types of Maize Technology Represented in the Sample........................19 7 Disaggregation of Maize Technology Types by Zone .........................20 8 Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Maize Yields in Jimma and West Shoa .....22 9 Labor Use in Maize Production by Technology Group.........................24 10 Graduate Farmers’ Response to Recommended Maize Practices..................24 11 Reasons Given by Maize Graduates in West Shoa for Not Continuing a Given Technology Component .........................................................25 12 Tef Seed and Fertilizer Use in East Shoa by Different Plot Types.................27 13 Seeding Rate and Grain Yields by Tef Seed Varieties Used in East Shoa ...........28 14 Types of Tef technology Represented in the Sample...........................29 15 Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Tef Yields in East Shoa (Model 1). 30 16 Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Tef Yields in East Shoa (Model 2) ........30 17 Graduate Farmers’ Response to Recommended Tef Practices, East Shoa...........32 18 The Most Common Reasons Given by Graduates in East Shoa for Not Continuing a Given Tef Technology Component.............................................32 19 Financial Budgets for Tef (East Shoa) .....................................90 20 Financial Budgets for Maize (West Shoa) ...................................92 21 Financial Budgets for Maize (Jimma) ......................................94 LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page 1 Location of Survey Sites. .. 3 LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title Page 1 Examples of GMRP/MSU/SG2000/MOA Survey Questionnaires .................44 2 Methods for Yield Estimation and Area Measurement .........................78 3 Financial Budgets .....................................................89 v LIST OF ACRONYMS AFR/SD/PSGE Africa Bureau’s Office of Sustainable Development, Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division AISE Agricultural Input Supply Enterprise CERES Crop-Environment Resource Synthesis CSA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grain Market Research Project
    Grain Market Research Project PROMOTING FERTILIZER USE IN ETHIOPIA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF IMPROVING GRAIN MARKET PERFORMANCE, INPUT MARKET EFFICIENCY, AND FARM MANAGEMENT Mulat Demeke Ali Said T.S. Jayne WORKING PAPER 5 GRAIN MARKET RESEARCH PROJECT MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION ADDIS ABABA MARCH 1997 PROMOTING FERTILIZER USE IN ETHIOPIA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF IMPROVING GRAIN MARKET PERFORMANCE, INPUT MARKET EFFICIENCY, AND FARM MANAGEMENT MULAT DEMEKE ALI SAID T.S. JAYNE MARCH 1997 This is a revised and expanded version of a paper presented at the Grain Market Research Project Discussion Forum, November 8-9, 1996, Sodere, Ethiopia, sponsored by the Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation, Government of Ethiopia. Mulat Demeke is Lecturer, Addis Ababa University, Ali Said is Research Scholar, Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation; and T.S. Jayne is Visiting Associate Professor, Michigan State University. The authors thank Aklu Girgre, Daniel Molla, Asres Workneh, Steven Franzel, Valerie Kelly, and Jim Shaffer for comments on a previous draft. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ...................................................... 1 2. THE PROFITABILITY OF FERTILIZER USE .............................. 7 2.1. Factors Influencing Fertilizer Use .................................. 7 2.2. Measuring the Profitability of Fertilizer .............................. 7 (a) The value-cost ratio (VCR)................................ 8 (b) The reservation price of fertilizer........................... 10 3. THE EFFECTS OF IMPROVING FERTILIZER MARKET .................... 14 3.1. Implications for Fertilizer Prices .................................. 14 3.2. The Impact on Fertilizer Profitability ............................... 21 4. THE IMPLICATIONS OF IMPROVING THE OUTPUT MARKET.............. 23 5. IMPROVING THE YIELD RESPONSE TO FERTILIZERS.................... 26 5.1. Constraints to Improved Yield Response ............................ 26 5.2. The Implications of Improving Output Response ...................... 31 5.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Selfhelpafrica.Org 2020-21 1 2020-21 Alemnesh Tereda, 28, and Marsenesh Lenina, 29, Injaffo Multi Barley Coop, Gumer
    ETHIOPIA selfhelpafrica.org 2020-21 1 2020-21 Alemnesh Tereda, 28, and Marsenesh Lenina, 29, Injaffo Multi barley Coop, Gumer caling up agricultural production, improving nutrition Last year, the organisation was involved in implementing security, developing new enterprise and market close to a dozen development projects, all of which Sopportunities for farmers, strengthening community- are being undertaken in collaboration with local and/or based seed production and building climate resilience, are international partners. all key areas of Self Help Africa’s work in Ethiopia. ETHIOPIA PROJECT KEY Scaling up RuSACCOs Strengthening & Scaling up of rehabilitaion of degraded lands and enhancement of livelihoods in Lake Ziway catchment ERITREA Feed the Future Gondar Dairy for Development Stronger Together: Linking Primary Seed and Seep Cooperative Union Addis Ababa Climate-Smart Agriculture SOMALILAND Capacity Building of Farmer Butajira Training Centers Unleashing the productive ETHIOPIA capacity of poor people through Graduation Approach in Ethiopia Integrated Community Development SOMALIA Livelihood Enhancement: Working Inclusively for Transformation KENYA 2 Implementing Programme Programme Donor Total Budget Time Frame Partner Area Climate-Smart Irish Aid € 806,695 2015 SOS Sahel, SNNP region 01 Agriculture (CSA) Farm Africa, 2019 Vita MF: Scaling Up Irish League of € 420,000 2020 Zonal Departments of N/Shewa Zone of 02 Rural Savings and Credit international Finance & Economic Amhara, N/Shewa Credit Cooperatives Development 2022 Cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms Among Ambo Woreda
    al Science tic & li P Muchie and Bayeh, J Pol Sci Pub Aff 2015, 3:1 o u P b f l i o c DOI: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000147 l A a Journal of Political Sciences & f n f r a u i r o s J ISSN: 2332-0761 Public Affairs Research Article Open Access Traditional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms among Ambo Woreda Communities Zelalem Muchie* and Endalcachew Bayeh Department of Civics and Ethical Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia Abstract Conflicts in ambo are emanated from various sources. These factors, inter alia, are associated with competition over grazing land and water resources, boundary conflicts on farm lands, problems of access to water irrigation, sense of superiority, and women’s abduction. These multifaceted natures of conflicts have been solved by different traditional conflict resolution mechanisms. Accordingly, conflicts have been resolved through knowledgeable and respected elders, religious leaders, marriage relationships, ceremonies observed by the community, women reconciliation mechanisms, and highly respected and feared clan leaders. However, for better resolution of conflicts in the communities the study calls for better encouragement, support and duly recognition of traditional mechanisms. Keywords: Ambo; Elders; Oromiya; Traditional conflict resolution in the Horn of Africa. Putting it differently, conflicts were manifest mechanisms problems in Ethiopian empire in the Horn of Africa [6]. The sources and dynamics of conflict in the Horn of Africa region were different Introduction and less predictable. The sources of conflict in Ethiopia and the Horn Many scholars in the field of conflict resolution and peace building of Africa include, inter alia, centralization of power, misallocation of process have defined conflict in a way that enables us to understand resources, uneven economic development and border lines [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence, Risk Factors and Antimicrobial Suscep- Tibility Profile of Salmonella Isolated from Dogs of Ambo, Bako and Gojo Towns of West Shoa, Ethiopia
    Zewdu et al., Ethiop. Vet. J., 2019, 23 (1), 59-77 DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/evj.v23i1.5 Ethiopian Veterinary Journal Prevalence, risk factors and antimicrobial suscep- tibility profile of Salmonella isolated from dogs of Ambo, Bako and Gojo towns of West Shoa, Ethiopia Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin*1, Sisay Miheretu2, Lencho Megersa3, Edilu Jorga Sarba1, Getachew Kebebew1 and Solomon Shiferaw3 1Department of Veterinary Sciences, College of College of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, Ambo University, P.O.Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia. 2Department of Animal Production and Technology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Welkite University, P.O.Box 07, Welkite,Guragie Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. 3Department of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, Ambo University, P.O.Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin [email protected], Abstract Salmonella is the most known zoonotic bacterial agent, which produces sal- monellosis in animals as wells as in humans. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence, to determine antimicrobial susceptibility and to assess risk factors associated with Salmonella shedding in dogs in selected towns of West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Using a cross-sectional design, a total of 438 rectal swab samples were collected from randomly selected dogs for isolation and identification of Salmonella using standard procedures. A ques- tionnaire survey was also administered. The results showed that 48 (11.0%, 95%, [CI]: 8.2% - 14.3 %) dogs were positive for Salmonella.The occurrenceof Salmonella was 10.9% (26/238), 11.6% (15/129) and 9.9% (7/71) in Ambo, Bako and Gojo towns respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economics Characterization of Agricultural
    Vol. 11(8), pp. 197-216, August 2019 DOI: 10.5897/JDAE2017.0914 Article Number: B32286861590 ISSN 2006-9774 Copyright ©2019 Journal of Development and Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE Economics Full Length Research Paper Socio-economics characterization of agricultural farming system in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: Case of AGP-II districts participatory rural appraisal (PRA) model Aklilu Nigussie1* and Agajie Tesfaye2 1Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agricultural Economics Research, Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research, P. O. Box 32, Debre Zeit, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. 2Department of Agricultural Economics Research, Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research, P. O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Received 12 December, 2017; Accepted 8 May, 2018 This paper presents the farming system dynamics in Agricultural Growth Project II and applied a PRA model. The objective was to characterize the farming systems of AGP-II districts and identify production constraints. We investigate how historical trends have influenced the farming system, using data from desk review surveys, semi-structured interviews, focus-group discussions; key informant discussions and observations; by investigating two sample districts of AGP II; these were Ambo and Girar Jarso of Oromia regional state of Ethiopia. From each district two PAs were selected randomly applying stratified sampling techniques for AGP II districts. Findings indicate a high disparity in the characterization of wealth and status; that requires intervention to minimize gaps with agricultural technologies; the micro finance institutions have a long way to go to support the input service thought it has increased from 5% in 2012 to 8%in 2017 credit supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromiya 4 Zone Code Wereda Code Town Code West
    REGION - OROMIYA 4 ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE WEST WELEGA 01 MENE SIBU 01 MENDI 1 NEJO 02 NEJO 1 WERE JIRU 2 GORI 3 GIMBI 03 HOMA 1 LALO ASABI 04 ENANGO 1 DENIGORO 2 KILTU KARA 05 KILTU KARA 1 BOJI DIRMEJ 06 BILA 2 AYIRA GULISO 07 GULISO 1 AYIRA 2 JARSO 08 GEBA DEFINO 1 KONDALA 09 GEBA DEFNO 1 BOJI CHEKORSA 10 CHEKORSA 1 BABO GAMBEL 11 DEBEKA 1 YUBDO 12 YUBDO 1 GENJI 13 GENJI 1 HARU 14 GUYU 1 NOLE KABA 15 BUBE 1 BEGI 16 BEGI 1 KOBER 2 GIMBI /TOWN/ 17 GIMBE 1 SEYO NOLE 18 DEBESO 1 EAST WELEGA 02 LIMU 01 GELILA 1 IBANTU 02 HINDE 1 GIDA KIREMU 03 GIDA AYANA 1 KIREMU 2 GUTEN 3 HORO LIMU 04 BONIYA BUSHE 05 BILO 1 WAYU TUKA 06 GEBA JIMATA 1 GUDEYA BILA 07 JERE 1 BILA 2 GOBU SEYO 08 ANO 1 OROMIYA (Cont'd) ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE EAST WELEGA 02 SIBU SIRE 09 SIRE 1 DIGA 10 ARJO GUDETU 1 IFA 2 SASIGA 11 GALO 1 LEKA DULECHA 12 GETEMA 1 GUTO GIDA 13 DIGA 1 JIMA ARJO 14 ARJO 1 NUNU KUMBA 15 NUNU 1 WAMA HAGELO 16 NEKEMTE /TOWN/ 17 NEKEMTE 1 ILU ABA BORA 03 DARIMU 01 DUPA 1 ALGE SACHI 02 ALGE 1 SUPE 2 CHORA 03 KUMBABE 1 DEGA 04 DEGA 1 DABO HANA 05 KONE 1 GECHI 06 GECHI 1 BORECHA 07 YANFU 1 DEDESA 08 DENBI 1 YAYU 09 YAYU 1 METU ZURIYA 10 ALE 11 GORE 1 BURE 12 BURE 01 1 SIBU 2 NONO SELE 13 BIRBIRSA 1 OROMIYA (Cont'd) ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE ILU ABA BORA 03 BICHO 14 BICHO 1 BILO NOPHA 15 NOPA 1 HURUMU 16 HURUMU 1 DIDU 17 LALO 1 MAKO 18 MAKO 1 HUKA /HALU/ 19 HUKA 01 1 METU TOWN 20 METU 1 BEDELE TOWN 21 BEDELE 1 BEDELE ZURIYA 22 - 1 CHEWAKA 23 ILU HARERE 1 DORENI 24 JIMA 04 LIMU SEKA 01 ANTAGO 1 LIMU KOSA 02 LIMU GENET 1 AMBUYE 2 BABU
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Census 2007
    Table 1 : POPULATION SIZE OF REGIONS BY SEX AND PLACE OF RESIDENCE: 2007 Urban + Rural Urban Rural Sex No. % No. % No. % COUNTRY TOTAL * Both Sexes 73,918,505 100.00 11,956,170 100.00 61,962,335 100.00 Male 37,296,657 50.46 5,942,170 49.70 31,354,487 50.60 Female 36,621,848 49.54 6,014,000 50.30 30,607,848 49.40 TIGRAY Region Both Sexes 4,314,456 100.00 842,723 100.00 3,471,733 100.00 Male 2,124,853 49.25 398,072 47.24 1,726,781 49.74 Female 2,189,603 50.75 444,651 52.76 1,744,952 50.26 AFFAR Region * Both Sexes 1,411,092 100.00 188,973 100.00 1,222,119 100.00 Male 786,338 55.73 100,915 53.40 685,423 56.08 Female 624,754 44.27 88,058 46.60 536,696 43.92 AMHARA Region Both Sexes 17,214,056 100.00 2,112,220 100.00 15,101,836 100.00 Male 8,636,875 50.17 1,024,136 48.49 7,612,739 50.41 Female 8,577,181 49.83 1,088,084 51.51 7,489,097 49.59 ORORMIYA Region Both Sexes 27,158,471 100.00 3,370,040 100.00 23,788,431 100.00 Male 13,676,159 50.36 1,705,316 50.60 11,970,843 50.32 Female 13,482,312 49.64 1,664,724 49.40 11,817,588 49.68 SOMALI Region * Both Sexes 4,439,147 100.00 621,210 100.00 3,817,937 100.00 Male 2,468,784 55.61 339,343 54.63 2,129,441 55.77 Female 1,970,363 44.39 281,867 45.37 1,688,496 44.23 BENISHANGUL-GUMUZ Region Both Sexes 670,847 100.00 97,965 100.00 572,882 100.00 Male 340,378 50.74 49,784 50.82 290,594 50.72 Female 330,469 49.26 48,181 49.18 282,288 49.28 SNNP Region Both Sexes 15,042,531 100.00 1,545,710 100.00 13,496,821 100.00 Male 7,482,051 49.74 797,796 51.61 6,684,255 49.52 Female 7,560,480 50.26 747,914 48.39 6,812,566
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Selfhelpafrica.Org 2019 1 Implementing Programme Donor Total Budget Time Frame Programme Area Partner
    ETHIOPIA selfhelpafrica.org 2019 1 Implementing Programme Donor Total Budget Time Frame Programme Area Partner Climate-Smart Irish Aid €806,695 2015 SOS Sahel, SNNP region 01 Agriculture Farm Africa, 2019 Vita Building Opportunities Church of Ireland €142,249 2015 East Shewa Zone Oromia region 02 through Seed Enterprise Bishop’s Appeal Agriculture Office, Transformation Guernsey Overseas Aid 2019 Cooperative Office and (BOSET) Commission Finance and Economic Irish Aid Development Office Bezina Abinet roasting coffee beans with her son 2019 in her shop in Dodata, Oromia, Ethiopia. Scaling Community- Agricultural €1,450,176 2016 Hibret Fire, Halaba, SNNPR region and 03 Based Seed Production Transformation Agency Kenbata, Tegulet, Guna Amhara region 2019 and Wemberma farmer cooperatives caling up agricultural production, improving nutrition Last year, the organisation was involved in implementing security, developing new enterprise and market close to a dozen development projects, all of which Stronger Together Electric Aid €29,726 2019 Edget Beadinet and South Gondar and West opportunities for farmers, strengthening community- are being undertaken in collaboration with local and/or PROGRAMMES ETHIOPIA S 04 Irish Aid Guna Seed Unions Gojam zones in Amhara based seed production and building climate resilience, are international partners. 2020 region all key areas of Self Help Africa’s work in Ethiopia. Scaling Up Rural Irish League of Credit €457,000 2016 Tinsaye, Bekelcha Sella, North Shewa Zone of 05 Savings and Credit Unions Foundation,
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors For
    Ophthalmic Epidemiology ISSN: 0928-6586 (Print) 1744-5086 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iope20 Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Trachoma in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: Results of 79 Population-Based Prevalence Surveys Conducted with the Global Trachoma Mapping Project Berhanu Bero, Colin Macleod, Wondu Alemayehu, Solomon Gadisa, Ahmed Abajobir, Yilikal Adamu, Menbere Alemu, Liknaw Adamu, Michael Dejene, Addis Mekasha, Zelalem Habtamu Jemal, Damtew Yadeta, Oumer Shafi, Genet Kiflu, Rebecca Willis, Rebecca M. Flueckiger, Brian K. Chu, Alexandre L. Pavluck, Anthony W. Solomon & for the Global Trachoma Mapping Project To cite this article: Berhanu Bero, Colin Macleod, Wondu Alemayehu, Solomon Gadisa, Ahmed Abajobir, Yilikal Adamu, Menbere Alemu, Liknaw Adamu, Michael Dejene, Addis Mekasha, Zelalem Habtamu Jemal, Damtew Yadeta, Oumer Shafi, Genet Kiflu, Rebecca Willis, Rebecca M. Flueckiger, Brian K. Chu, Alexandre L. Pavluck, Anthony W. Solomon & for the Global Trachoma Mapping Project (2016) Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Trachoma in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: Results of 79 Population-Based Prevalence Surveys Conducted with the Global Trachoma Mapping Project, Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 23:6, 392-405, DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1243717 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2016.1243717 © 2016 The Authors. Published with license Published online: 07 Nov 2016. by Taylor & Francis Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2068 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 19
    [Show full text]