DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 145 Ï NUMBER 012 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 40th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, March 18, 2010 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 605 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, March 18, 2010 The House met at 10 a.m. By way of explanation, the committee was not satisfied with the government response, and on November 26, 2009, the committee unanimously passed a motion that the Minister of Justice be requested to address each of the recommendations in the report and Prayers provide background for his caution and concerns by January 15. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS On December 10, 2009, the minister wrote to the committee and agreed to comply, subject to an extension to February 15. The Ï (1000) committee concurred with the extension but no response has yet [English] been received. Although the House was prorogued on December 30, the committee anticipated that a response would still be forthcoming. KEEPING CANADIANS SAFE (INTERNATIONAL Discussions have been held with the Minister of Justice to resolve TRANSFER OF OFFENDERS) ACT this matter and we await his consideration for his undertakings and Hon. Vic Toews (Minister of Public Safety, CPC) moved for his response to our invitation to him to appear before committee. leave to introduce Bill C-5, An Act to amend the International Transfer of Offenders Act. Finally, ostensibly the reason for re-tabling this report in the (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) House is so that there is a report which the committee can refer to in *** the current session. I expect that there may be other committees that have similar situations as a consequence of the last prorogation of COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Parliament. ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND ETHICS Mr. Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have I also have the honour to present, in both official languages, the two reports to present this morning. They will require some second report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, explanation, so I hope the House will indulge me. Privacy and Ethics. I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the first report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy At its meeting on Thursday, March 11 the committee unanimously and Ethics. adopted a motion that the 11th report entitled “The Access to At its meeting on Thursday, March 11 the committee unanimously Information Act: First Steps Towards Renewal” adopted and adopted a motion that the 10th report entitled “The Privacy Act: First presented to the House in the second session of the 40th Parliament Steps Towards Renewal” adopted and presented to the House in the be adopted as a report of the committee in the present session, and second session of the 40th Parliament be adopted as a report of the that the chair present the report to the House. committee in the present session, and that the chair present the report to the House. The report tabled in the last session requests that the government The report tabled in the last session requested that the government table a comprehensive response to the report pursuant to Standing table a comprehensive response to the report pursuant to Standing Order 109. As the government tabled its response to the report on Order 109. As the government did in fact table its response to the October 9, 2009, the report being tabled today is identical in all report on October 9, the report being tabled today is identical in all respects to the report tabled last session with the exception that it respects to the report tabled last session with the exception that it does not include pages 31 and 32, which only requested a does not include pages 29 and 30, which only requested a government response. government response. The minutes and evidence of the meeting of March 11 will reflect The minutes and evidence of the committee meeting of March 11 that the chair is to specifically advise the House that we are not will reflect that the chair will specifically advise the House that we requesting a government response. are not requesting a government response. 606 COMMONS DEBATES March 18, 2010 Routine Proceedings By way of explanation again, similarly, the committee was not [English] satisfied with the government response of October 9, 2009, and on November 26 the committee unanimously passed a motion that the Mr. Paul Szabo: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. With justice minister be requested to address each of the recommendations regard to the motion just dealt with by the House, as I understood it, in the report and provide background for his caution and concerns. was it requesting an amendment to the Standing Orders? I understand that it is only temporary. For the record, identical to the previous statement, we are still in The Speaker: I believe the motion says: discussions and we look forward to receiving the justice minister's concurrence with our request for him to respond and to appear before [Translation] committee. The amendment applies only to this session of this Parliament. Ï (1005) [English] AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD Mr. Wayne Marston: Mr. Speaker, I too rise on a point of order. Mr. Larry Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, CPC): Mr. There is a serious situation facing Canada's pensioners. I would like Speaker, I have the privilege of tabling two reports today, in both to ask for unanimous consent to move the following motion which official languages, from the Standing Committee on Agriculture and states that notwithstanding any order or usual practice of the House, Agri-Food. Bill C-476, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act The first report is in relation to supplementary estimates (C) of and other Acts (unfunded pension plan liabilities), be deemed to 2009-10. have been read a second time and referred to a committee of the whole, deemed considered in committee of the whole, deemed The second report is in relation to the main estimates of 2010-11. reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage, and deemed read a third time and passed. ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Mr. James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I The Speaker: Does the hon. member for Hamilton East—Stoney have the honour to present, in both official languages, the first report Creek have the unanimous consent of the House to propose this of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable motion? Development in relation to supplementary estimates (C) 2009-10. Some hon. members: Agreed. *** Some hon. members: No. [Translation] The Speaker: There is no consent. SPEECH FROM THE THRONE Mr. Michel Guimond (Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute- *** Côte-Nord, BQ): Mr. Speaker, there have been discussions among all parties and I believe you would find unanimous consent for the PETITIONS following motion. CANADA POST That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, for the purpose of the debate on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne of the Hon. John McCallum (Markham—Unionville, Lib.): Mr. third session of the 40th Parliament, Standing Order 50(4) be amended as follows: Speaker, I would like to present three petitions on behalf of “(4) On the third of the said days, if a subamendment be under consideration at constituents. fifteen minutes before the end of the time provided for the Address debate, the Speaker shall interrupt the proceedings and forthwith put the question on the said First, approximately 200 residents are concerned that Canada Post subamendment.”; and has deleted Unionville from the postal code reference library. They When the debate conclude on the said subamendment, it be deemed put, a recorded division be deemed requested and deferred until Tuesday, March 23, 2010, want the necessary steps to be taken to recognize the existence of at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders. Unionville by restoring its name to the postal code reference library. MINING INDUSTRY Ï (1010) Hon. John McCallum (Markham—Unionville, Lib.): Mr. The Speaker: Does the hon. member for Montmorency— Speaker, the second petition is signed by approximately 400 Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord have the unanimous consent of the individuals who wish to create effective laws regarding corporate House to move the motion? social responsibility, particularly in the area of mining. They ask that we consent to the expeditious passage of Bill C-300. Some hon. members: Agreed. ANIMAL WELFARE The Speaker: The House has heard the terms of the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Hon. John McCallum (Markham—Unionville, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the third petition is from approximately 150 people who Some hon. members: Agreed. petition the Government of Canada to support a universal declaration (Motion agreed to) on animal welfare. March 18, 2010 COMMONS DEBATES 607 Privilege ASSISTED SUICIDE feel pain and suffering and that we should avoid cruelty to animals Mr. Larry Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, CPC): Mr. and reduce their suffering. Speaker, I have the honour to table a petition today. I will be requesting that the committee on justice and human rights look at it. The petition also states that animals are not taken into It is a petition from approximately 40 of my constituents who are consideration in the event of a natural disaster. The petitioners are opposed to Bill C-384. calling on the Government of Canada to support the universal declaration on animal welfare. This bill would legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide. My constituents are saying they oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide FINANCE as it directly threatens the lives of people with disabilities and other Mr.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting As The

    1 Modernizing Canada's Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting As The

    Modernizing Canada’s Electoral System: Instant Runoff Voting as the Best Alternative By Maxime Dubé, as an individual Summary In the context of electoral reform brought about by the current government, many electoral systems come into contention for replacing the current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. In this brief, it is argued that the instant-runoff voting (IRV) system is the best alternative for the current FPTP system in Canada. It solves most of Canadians’ issues with the current system, while presenting itself as the least challenging option for all bodies implicated in a federal election. Additionally, the IRV system does not produce coalition governments like other systems, thus allowing the state to remain strong and effective. The adoption of mandatory voting should only be considered after researching methods that will incentivize citizens to vote. Finally, online voting should not to be considered, due to potential security concerns. Introduction The present FPTP system is an electoral system that has been, and still is widely used throughout the world. It “is one of the oldest and simplest electoral systems”1 For instance, this voting system is presently used in all legislative elections in Canada, for national parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, as well as for India and most Caribbean islands2. With the election of the current majoritarian Liberal government in the 2015 general election, one of the electoral promises made by the party and its leader, Justin Trudeau, was that the general election of 2015 would be the last federal election to be held with the FPTP system3.
  • Core 1..186 Hansard

    Core 1..186 Hansard

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 18, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3683 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 18, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. (a) the motion shall again be considered on a day designated by the Government after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the tenth sitting day after the interruption; Prayers (b) debate on the motion shall be resumed at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on the day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section and shall not be further interrupted or adjourned; and (c) when no Member rises to speak or after three hours of debate, whichever is GOVERNMENT ORDERS earlier, the Speaker shall put all questions necessary to dispose of the motion, provided that, if a recorded division is requested on the motion considered on a (1000) Ï day designated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this Standing Order, it shall stand [English] deferred to an appointed time on the next Wednesday, no later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on that day. STANDING ORDERS (3) Not more than one motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing or Hon. Anne McLellan (for the Leader of the Government in the special committee may be moved on any sitting day.
  • Core 1..112 Hansard

    Core 1..112 Hansard

    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 037 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, January 29, 2014 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2277 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, January 29, 2014 The House met at 2 p.m. [English] JUSTICE Mr. Rob Anders (Calgary West, CPC): Mr. Speaker, rape is a Prayers crime like no other. It is a violation of the spirit as well as the body. It is an assault on trust, privacy and control. It can leave the victim with a sense of bruising, shame and guilt, and it happens to a woman in Ï (1400) Canada every 17 minutes. These are women who are teachers, nurses and judges. They are women whose husbands may be doctors or [English] lawyers. The Speaker: It being Wednesday, we will now have the singing Thirty years ago, rape was folded along with indecent assault into of the national anthem led by the hon. member for Abitibi— a new crime called “sexual assault”. It covered everything from Témiscamingue. unwanted touching to any form of penetration, including offences involving a weapon or bodily harm. [Members sang the national anthem] Getting rid of the term “rape” did not stop it. Many argue that it negatively changed the justice system and resulted in lighter not tougher sentencing. The average jail sentence for sexual assault STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS offenders is two years. [Translation] Today, I will be introducing a private member's bill that would help to change this. The bill would establish much tougher FRANCINE LALONDE mandatory minimum sentences for sexual assaults that fall within the definition of rape, and those sentences would be served Mr.
  • Scanned by Camscanner

    Scanned by Camscanner

    Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner IRONING OUT THE CREASES: RE-EXAMINING THE CONTOURS OF INVOKING ARTICLE 142(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION Rajat Pradhan* ABSTRACT In the light of the extraordinary and rather frequent invocation of Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India, this note expounds a constructive theory of perusing Article 142(1) by the Supreme Court. The central inquiry seeks to answer the contemporaneous question of whether Article 142 can be invoked to make an order or pass a decree which is inconsistent or in express conflict with the substantive provisions of a statute. To aid this inquiry, cases where the apex court has granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent in exercise of Article 142(1) have been examined extensively. Thus the note also examines the efficacy and indispensible nature of this power in nebulous cases where the provisions of a statute are insufficient for solving contemporary problems or doing complete justice. INTRODUCTION An exemplary provision, Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India envisages that the Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such enforceable decree or order as is necessary for doing ‘complete justice’ in any cause or matter pending before it. While the jurisprudence surrounding other provisions of the Constitution has developed manifold, rendering them more concrete and stable interpretations, Article 142(1) is far from tracing this trend. The nature and scope of power contemplated in Article 142(1) has continued to be mooted imaginatively.
  • September 17, 2018 Guideinsider’S

    September 17, 2018 Guideinsider’S

    The Hill Times’ September 17, 2018 guideInsider’s The THE100 th TOP LOBBYISTS 26 by Beatrice Paez ANNUAL Nancy Peckford Politically Savvy on women in politics by NEIL MOSS Emily Haws: a primer on fall parties The 17th Annual AFN Chief TERRIFIC Perry Bellegarde 25 Staffers, ON HIS VISION by NEIL MOSS Lisa Van Dusen Joe Jordan’s guide on Washington, D.C. The Prime Minister’s Office in Ottawa. TO THE FALL SESSION The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade 2 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 | THE HILL TIMES INSIDER’S GUIDE Feature Insider’s Guide EDITOR Kate Malloy MANAGING EDITOR Kristen Shane DEPUTY EDITORS Peter Mazereeuw, Charelle Evelyn ASSISTANT DEPUTY EDITOR Abbas Rana DIGITAL EDITOR Beatrice Paez PUBLISHED EVERY MONDAY AND WEDNESDAY BY HILL TIMES PUBLISHING INC. 246 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5E4 PUBLISHERS Anne Marie Creskey, Jim Creskey, Ross Dickson PUBLISHER/VICE PRESIDENT Don Turner GENERAL MANAGER, CFO Andrew Morrow EDITORIAL SENIOR REPORTER Laura Ryckewaert NEWS REPORTERS Emily Haws, Jolson Lim, Neil Moss, Samantha Wright Allen PHOTOGRAPHERS Sam Garcia, Andrew Meade and Cynthia Münster EDITORIAL CARTOONIST Michael De Adder CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Christopher Guly, Leslie MacKinnon, Cynthia Münster COLUMNISTS Keith Brooks, Karl Bélanger, Andrew Caddell, Andrew Cardozo, John Chenier, David Coletto, Sheila Copps, David Crane, Jim Creskey, Darryl T. Davies, Murray Dobbin, Gwynne Dyer, Michael Geist, Greg Elmer, Riccardo Filippone, Alice Funke, Dennis Gruending, Cory Hann, Chantal Hébert, Joe Jordan, Warren Kinsella, Alex Marland, Gillian McEachern, Arthur Milnes, Dan Palmer, Nancy Peckford, Angelo Persichilli, Kate Purchase, Tim Powers, Jeremy Richler, Susan Riley, Ken Rubin, Sarah Schmidt, Rick Smith, Evan Sotiropoulos, Mathieu R.
  • Debates of the House of Commons

    Debates of the House of Commons

    43rd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) VOLUME 149 NUMBER 005 Wednesday, December 11, 2019 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 263 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, December 11, 2019 The House met at 2 p.m. tude to the people of Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis for plac‐ ing their trust in me for the fifth time in a row. I would also like to thank our amazing team of volunteers, my Prayer family and my wonderful wife, Marie. My entire team and I are here to help the people in our riding. We are facing major chal‐ ● (1405) lenges, but, unfortunately, the throne speech was silent on subjects [English] such as the labour shortage, shipbuilding and high-speed Internet and cell service in the regions. The Speaker: It being Wednesday, we will now have the singing of O Canada led by the hon. member for Kitchener—Conestoga. People say that election campaigns begin on election night, but in Quebec, in Canada and in my riding, Bellechasse—Les [Members sang the national anthem] Etchemins—Lévis, we are rolling up our sleeves and focusing on sustainable prosperity. * * * STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS [English] [Translation] NEWMARKET—AURORA CLOSURE OF BRUNSWICK SMELTER Mr. Tony Van Bynen (Newmarket—Aurora, Lib.): Mr. Speak‐ Mr. Serge Cormier (Acadie—Bathurst, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I er, I am proud to rise in the House for the first time as the member want to start by thanking the voters of Acadie—Bathurst for giving of Parliament for Newmarket—Aurora in the 43rd Parliament.
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)

    Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
  • Oh, Oh! Modeling Parliamentary Interruptions in Canada, 1926-2015

    Oh, Oh! Modeling Parliamentary Interruptions in Canada, 1926-2015

    Oh, oh! Modeling Parliamentary Interruptions in Canada, 1926-2015 Tanya Whyte Department of Political Science, University of Toronto Presented at Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference Ryerson University, Toronto, May 27-June 2, 2017 Abstract Literature on the Canadian "democratic deficit" argues that parliamentary decorum in the Canadian House of Commons, including disruptive be- haviours like heckling and cheering, has been worsening over recent decades. Such questions of long-term change in parliamentary behaviour are amenable to text as data methods, a rapidly emerging field in quantitative social sci- ence. This analysis uses the Lipad dataset, a new machine-readable digi- tization of the complete text of the Canadian House of Commons Debates (Hansard), to investigate disruptive behaviour (measured via parliamentary interruptions) in the House of Commons from 1926-2015. Five hypotheses are tested using a multinomial logit model: that interruptions have increased in probability over time; that ministers are likeliest and backbenchers least likeliest to be interrupted; that women MPs are more likely to be interrupted; and that interruptions are more common under majority government condi- tions. Preliminary version: Please do not cite or distribute until a final version is posted. Thanks to Arthur Spirling for his advice and feedback. PARLIAMENTARY INTERRUPTIONS IN CANADA, 1926-2015 2 Introduction The conduct of elected representatives in the House of Commons has been a fre- quent target of criticism in the Canadian "democratic deficit" literature. One root of voter malaise in Canada and in other Westminster-style democracies, it is argued, is public re- pugnance for adversarial and crude political debate, particularly during Question Period (Docherty, 2005; Grisdale, 2011).
  • The Fragility of Fear: the Contentious Politics of Emotion and Security in Canada

    The Fragility of Fear: the Contentious Politics of Emotion and Security in Canada

    The Fragility of Fear: the Contentious Politics of Emotion and Security in Canada by Eric Van Rythoven A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2017, Eric Van Rythoven Abstract International Relations (IR) theory commonly holds security arguments as powerful instruments of political mobilization because they work to instill, circulate, and intensify popular fears over a threat to a community. Missing from this view is how security arguments often provoke a much wider range of emotional reactions, many of which frustrate and constrain state officials’ attempts to frame issues as security problems. This dissertation offers a corrective by outlining a theory of the contentious politics of emotion and security. Drawing inspiration from a variety of different social theorists of emotion, including Goffman’s interactionist sociology, this approach treats emotions as emerging from distinctive repertoires of social interaction. These emotions play a key role in enabling audiences to sort through the sound and noise of security discourse by indexing the significance of different events to our bodies. Yet popular emotions are rarely harmonious; they’re socialized and circulated through a myriad of different pathways. Different repertoires of interaction in popular culture, public rituals, and memorialization leave audiences with different ways of feeling about putative threats. The result is mixed and contentious emotions which shape both opportunities and constraints for new security policies. The empirical purchase of this theory is illustrated with two cases drawn from the Canadian context: indigenous protest and the F-35 procurement.
  • Confronting Family Poverty and Social Exclusion Ensuring Work–Family Balance Advancing Social Integration and Intergenerational Solidarity in North America

    Confronting Family Poverty and Social Exclusion Ensuring Work–Family Balance Advancing Social Integration and Intergenerational Solidarity in North America

    Confronting family poverty and social exclusion Ensuring work–family balance Advancing social integration and intergenerational solidarity In North America North American Expert Group Meeting Convened as part of preparations for the Twentieth Anniversary of the International Year of the Family (2014) In cooperation with the Focal Point on the Family (United Nations DESA) Mexico City 19–20 May 2014 Revised Version January 2015 The Expert Group Meeting convened in Mexico City on 19-20 May 2014 was held as part of celebrations for the Twentieth Anniversary of the In- ternational Year of the Family. Experts and practitioners from the three countries discussed about the proposals for recommendations of social policies that should be promoted from United Nations. The outcomes, in particular its conclusions and recommendations, will further guide the fol- low-up of the Twentieth Anniversary and will be used as inputs to the up- coming reports of the Secretary-General on family issues. The Meeting was organized International Federation for Family Develop- ment (IFFD), a non–governmental, independent, and non–profit federa- tion, founded in 1978. Its activities consist of family enrichment courses organized in 65 countries of the five continents, with a participative meth- odology based in the case study method. IFFD collaborates in local, na- tional and international institutions to promote and protect family values. It holds general consultative status with the Economic and Social Commit- tee of the United Nations. © International Federation for Family Development – January 2015. Produced by the International Institute for Family Research – The Family Watch CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. FAMILY POLICY IN THE UN CONTEXT .......................................................................8 B.
  • Report to Canadians 2010 House of Commons Report to Canadians 2010

    Report to Canadians 2010 House of Commons Report to Canadians 2010

    Report to Canadians 2010 House of Commons Report to Canadians 2010 Period of this report: April 1, 2009–March 31, 2010 Total number of sitting days: 112 Contact Us Information Services Parliament of Canada Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9 [email protected] Toll Free (Canada): 1-866-599-4999 Telephone: 613-992-4793 TTY: 613-995-2266 ISBN X9-27/2010E-PDF Catalogue No. 978-1-100-15224-0 Photographs Bernard Clark / © House of Commons, p. I Bernard Thibodeau / © House of Commons, front cover, p. II, 20 and 22 © Parliament of Canada, p.18 Approved by the Board of Internal Economy CCD-041 Printing Letter from the Speaker As Speaker of the House of Commons, I am pleased to present the Report to Canadians 2010, covering the fiscal year from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. This report describes the work and accomplishments of the Members of the House of Commons and the activities and initiatives undertaken by the House Administration in support of Members and the institution. Canadians elect Members of Parliament to A tangible example of the House Administration represent them, but for many voters, the House facilitating the work of Members every day of Commons—and the role of Members—is is the second edition of House of Commons unfamiliar territory. While they are undoubtedly Procedure and Practice, released in 2009. This familiar with the daily Question Period they see authoritative book on procedure in the House on the evening news, this is only a very small was edited by Audrey O’Brien, Clerk of the part of a Member’s day.
  • Core 1..254 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)

    Core 1..254 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)

    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 148 Ï NUMBER 037 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, April 12, 2016 Speaker: The Honourable Geoff Regan CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2039 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, April 12, 2016 The House met at 10 a.m. The Speaker: The House has heard the terms of the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Some hon. members: Agreed. Prayer (Motion agreed to) *** ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS PETITIONS Ï (1000) [Translation] HIV/AIDS FOREIGN AFFAIRS Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP): Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present two petitions. Mr. David Lametti (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the The first is from constituents in my riding of Saanich—Gulf Minister of Foreign Affairs and pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), I Islands calling on the government to move to a national strategy on have the honour to table, in both official languages, the treaty HIV/AIDS, particularly based on the principle of treatment as entitled “Ministerial Declaration on Trade in Information Technol- prevention. ogy Products” adopted in Nairobi on December 16, 2015. *** SECURITY CERTIFICATES [English] Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP): Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with the very troubling ongoing issue of the COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE violation of human rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD the use of security certificates. In particular, the petitioners are very concerned that security certificates risk deportation to countries that Mr.