DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO State Ex Rel., JOHN FOCKLER, Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO State Ex Rel., JOHN FOCKLER, Et Al Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 06, 2017 - Case No. 2016-1863 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., JOHN FOCKLER, et al., : : Relators, : : Case No. 2016-1863 v. : : Original Action in Mandamus JON HUSTED, OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE, : : Original Action Respondent. : Under S. Ct. Prac. R. 12.04 RESPONDENT OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE JON HUSTED’S EVIDENCE VOLUME 2 MIKE DEWINE (0009181) Ohio Attorney General Mark R. Brown (0081941) HALLI BROWNFIELD WATSON (082466) 303 East Broad Street *Counsel of Record Columbus, Ohio JORDAN S. BERMAN (0093075) Tel: 614-236-6590 | Fax: 614-236-6956 Assistant Attorneys General [email protected] Constitutional Offices Section 30 East Broad Street, 16th Floor Counsel for Relators Columbus, Ohio 43215 Tel: 614-466-2872 | Fax: 614-728-7592 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Respondent Ohio Secretary of State IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., JOHN FOCKLER, et al., : : Relators, : : Case No. 2016-1863 v. : : Original Action in Mandamus JON HUSTED, OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE, : : Original Action Respondent. : Under S. Ct. Prac. R. 12.04 RESPONDENT OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE JON HUSTED’S EVIDENCE VOLUME 2 Respondent Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted submits the following evidence in this original action. VOLUME 1 Exhibit Document 1 Affidavit of Matthew Walsh, Exhibits A-G 2 S. B. 193 3 LSC Fiscal Analysis of S.B. 193 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, Application for Stay and Emergency 4 Injunction 5 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, Husted Opposition to Application 6 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 27 Appellee-Defendant Brief [Husted] VOLUME 2 Exhibit Document 7 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 18 Opinion and Preliminary Injunction Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 47 Opinion and Order and Preliminary 8 Injunction Exhibit Document Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 185 Intervenor State’s Memo in 9 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 10 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 336 Opinion and Order 11 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted, R. 369 Opinion and Order Respectfully submitted, MIKE DEWINE (0009181) Ohio Attorney General s/ Halli Brownfield Watson HALLI BROWNFIELD WATSON (082466)* *Counsel of Record JORDAN S. BERMAN (0093075) Assistant Attorneys General Constitutional Offices Section 30 East Broad Street, 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 Tel: 614-466-2872 | Fax: 614-728-7592 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Respondent Ohio Secretary of State CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Respondent Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted’s Evidence was served by regular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on January 6, 2017 and via email, upon the following: Mark R. Brown (0081941) 303 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio [email protected] Counsel for Relators s/ Halli Brownfield Watson HALLI BROWNFIELD WATSON (082466) Assistant Attorney General EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 8 Exhibit 9 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 185 Filed: 09/08/14 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 3602 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., : : Case No. 2:13-cv-00953 Plaintiffs, : : Judge Watson v. : : Magistrate Judge Kemp JON HUSTED, : : Defendant. : INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT THE STATE OF OHIO’S MEMORANDUM CONTRA INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THEIR FACIAL FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO S.B. 193 [Doc. No. 165], AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON INTERVENOR- PLAINTIFFS’ FACIAL FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO S.B. 193 Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL DEWINE Ohio Attorney General /s/ Kristopher J. Armstrong KRISTOPHER J. ARMSTRONG (0077799) Trial Attorney SARAH E. PIERCE (0087799) Assistant Attorneys General Constitutional Offices Section 30 East Broad Street, 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 466-2872 (614) 728-7592 (fax) [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Intervenor-Defendant State of Ohio Exh. 9, p | 1 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 185 Filed: 09/08/14 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 3603 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. FACTS .................................................................................................................................1 A. The Green Party of Ohio and Constitutional Party of Ohio Intervene as Plaintiffs. .............................................................................................1 B. Ohio’s Ballot Access Law at the Time of the Blackwell Decision. .........................2 C. Ballot Access Uncertainty Post-Blackwell. .............................................................3 D. H.B. 194: Ohio’s First Attempt at Statutory Ballot Access. ...................................4 E. S.B. 193 significantly reforms Ohio’s ballot access system. ...................................4 F. Ohio’s Choice to give general ballot access to a newly-formed political party’s candidate. .......................................................................................6 III. LAW AND ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................7 A. The challenged provisions of S.B. 193 are non-discriminatory in their application and are fully constitutional under the Anderson/Burdick framework. ................................................................................7 1. S.B. 193 does not severely burden Intervenor-Plaintiffs’ rights. .........................................................................................................10 2. Even assuming that the burden imposed is “severe”— which it is not—the challenged provisions of S.B. 193 are appropriately tailored to meet a compelling state interest as a matter of law. ..........................................................................................23 IV. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................24 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ......................................................................................................25 ii Exh. 9, p | 2 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 185 Filed: 09/08/14 Page: 3 of 31 PAGEID #: 3604 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page(s) American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767 (1974) ...........................................................................................................14, 15 Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (1983) ...................................................................................................................7 Barr v. Galvin, 626 F.3d 99, 109 (1st Cir. 2010) ............................................................................................8, 9 Burdick v. Takushi, 112 S.Ct. 2059 (1992) ......................................................................................................7, 8, 23 Constitution Party of Ohio v. Brunner, Case No. 2:08-cv-666 (S.D. Ohio 2008) ...................................................................................1 Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee, 109 S.Ct. 1013 (1989) ..............................................................................................................23 Green Party of Arkansas v. Martin, 649 F.3d 675 (8th Cir. 2011) .........................................................................................8, 11, 13 Green Party of Tennessee v. Hargett, Case No. 3:110-cv-00692, 2013 WL 3010697 (M.D. Tenn. June 18, 2013) ....................16, 17 Jeneness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 (1971) .................................................................................................................10 Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Blackwell. 462 F. 3d 579 (6th Cir. 2006) .......................................................................................... passim Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Brunner, 567 F.Supp2d 1006 (S.D. Ohio 2008) .......................................................................................1 Monro v. Socialist Workers Party, 479 U.S. 189 193-95 (1986) ......................................................................................1, 9, 13, 23 Moore v. Brunner, Case No. 2:08-cv-224 (S.D. Ohio 2008) ...................................................................................1 Rainbow Coalition of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State Election Board, 844 F.2d 740 (10th Cir. 1988) .................................................................................................12 iii Exh. 9, p | 3 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 185 Filed: 09/08/14 Page: 4 of 31 PAGEID #: 3605 Cases Page(s) Rogers v. Corbett, 468 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2006) ...............................................................................................8, 12 Rosario v. Rockefeller, 93 S. Ct. 1245 (1973) ...............................................................................................................23 Swanson v. Worley, 490 F.3d 894 (11th Cir. 2007) ...........................................................................................11, 12 Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 520 U.S. 351 (1997) .................................................................................................................10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Discourse of Sustainable Development: Business Groups, Local Government and Ngos In
    London School of Economics and Political Sciences The discourse of sustainable development: business groups, local government and NGOs in Juarez (Mexico) and El Paso (USA) PhD Thesis Claudia Granados Sociology Department December 2003 UMI Number: U222167 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U222167 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I H S £ S F For F.G. and my pa ABSTRACT The thesis proposes and develops a threefold categorisation as a framework for the analysis of the sustainable development (SD) discourse of business groups, local government and NGOs in the Mexico-US border region and specifically in the border cities of Juarez (Chihuahua, Mexico) and El Paso (Texas, US). The SD categorisation proposed in this thesis consists of three schools of thought, namely, Ecologism, Ecologically-sustainable-Development (EsD) and Corporate-Environmentalism. The thesis investigates how and why Corporate- Environmentalism came to dominate sustainable development discourse in the 1990s? Based on data collected in the border region of Juarez and El Paso, this thesis argues that Corporate-Environmentalism strongly influenced the sustainable development discourse of business groups, local government and NGOs and became the prevailing orthodoxy in the sustainable development discourse of the region during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Access Committee Report to NC
    Ballot Access Committee Report to NC As mentioned in the Presidential campaign debriefing, our 2012 Presidential campaign was the best in terms of ballot access since Ralph Nader ran as a Green in 2000. However, we fell short of our targets and exhausted a great deal of effort in getting on the ballot. The biggest difference between the Libertarian and Green Parties in terms of Presidential ballot lines was in our starting point. The Libertarians started off with 26 ballot lines after the 2010 midterm elections and the Greens only started off with 16. There were too many states with weak or nonexistent state parties that the Ballot Access Committee (BAC) was in poor position to assist. Delays in receiving matching funds exacerbated the campaign’s problems with trying to work in too many states at once on already scarce resources. BAC will be discussing a draft plan that sets goals for ballot access in each year of the 2013-2016 election cycle. Ultimately, our goal is to be on the ballot in between 45 and 47 states on Election Day in 2016. To make this goal more achievable, we plan to have at least 25 ballot lines after the 2014 midterm elections and at least 35 at the end of 2015. If the Green Party can achieve ballot access from 2013-15, not only will our final goal be much more achievable, but our Presidential campaign will be able to focus on what it should- winning votes on Election Day instead of fighting just to give voters a chance to see us on the ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division
    Case: 2:20-cv-02781-JLG-CMV Doc #: 12 Filed: 06/15/20 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 155 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HOWARD “HOWIE” HAWKINS , et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 2:20-cv-2781 : v. : Judge James L. Graham : : Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura RICHARD “MIKE” DeWINE, et al., : : Defendants. : PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I. STATEMENT OF FACTS As stated in the Amended Verified Complaint (Doc. 8), Plaintiffs Howard “Howie” Hawkins and Dario Hunter are independent candidates for election as President of the United States. They are seeking to qualify for the November 3, 2020 general election ballot in the State of Ohio. Amended Verified Compl., at ¶¶17-18 (Doc. 8, PageID #56). Plaintiffs Joseph DeMare, Becca Calhoun, Nathaniel Lane, Brett Joseph, and Anita Rios are registered voters in the State of Ohio. They are an experienced circulator of candidates’ nominating petitions, has successfully gathered signatures to nominate candidates, and seek to do so for the November 3, 2020 general election in the State of Ohio. They also seek to circulate, and gather signatures for, a petition to form the Green Party of Ohio as a minor political party under Ohio law. They are in one or more high-risk categories subject to life-threatening complications from “COVID-19”. Amended Verified Compl., at ¶¶19-23 (Doc. 8, PageID #56-57). [1] Case: 2:20-cv-02781-JLG-CMV Doc #: 12 Filed: 06/15/20 Page: 2 of 20 PAGEID #: 156 Plaintiffs Hawkins and Hunter are hereinafter referred to as the “Independent Candidates”.
    [Show full text]
  • John Rensenbrink 2020
    number 40 winter/spring • 2020 first issue of volume xvii Newsstand $5ºº green horiZon Magazine .….….….… .….….….… AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PUBLISHED BY THE GREEN HORIZON FOUNDATION a tribute to John Rensenbrink . table of contents The Green Horizon Team ............ 2 A Special Appeal The Primacy of Ecology ............. 3 STEVE WELZER John Rensenbrink’s Green praxis ...... 4 TONY AFFIGNE for a Special Issue A Fearless and Enthusiastic Educator .. 8 John Rensenbrink started Green Horizon just providing funding; they also request BARRY MILLS as a newsletter during the 1990s and then multiple copies of the magazine for Pathfinder Toward a expanded it into a notable international distribution to colleagues or for tabling Transformational Politics ............ 9 journal seventeen years ago. It’s now the at events. TED BECKER only major print magazine in the United A special way to honor John would be to States that features the coverage of Green sign up as a Sustainer. This would be an Friend, Mentor, Role Model. 10 CHARLES BROWN politics and the broad “greening” social- opportune time to do so because Green transformation movement. Horizon Foundation is making plans to John Played Key Role in Early US Green For the sake of maximum circulation branch out. We’re considering publishing Electoral Strategy ................. 13 we mail out copies to anyone who pamphlets and books, sponsoring conferences, MIKE FEINSTEIN requests to be on our Receivers List. In and hosting webinars. It would take Letter to the Green Parties that way it reaches some of the most additional resources for us to start reaching of the World ..................... 15 influential activists in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • AO 2002-03 Page 2
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 April 11, 2002 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADVISORY OPINION 2002-03 Paul Dumouchelle, Convener Green Party of Ohio 8832 Nairn Ct. Dublin, OH 43017 Dear Mr. Dumouchelle: This refers to your letter dated February 26, 2002, and received March 7, requesting an advisory opinion concerning the status of the Green Party of Ohio (“the Party”) as a State committee of a political party under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (“the Act”), and Commission regulations. Your request includes various documents including one which represents both the Party bylaws and the Party constitution (the “Bylaws”). This governing document details various aspects of the organization of the Party such as the manner in which the Party, using several different subgroups, including its State Coordinating Committee, engages in various activities; for example, helping to nominate Party candidates for Statewide office. The Bylaws further explain the procedures for holding the Party’s various meetings such as a biannual meeting and the biannual nominating convention at which the Party chooses the Green Party presidential candidate that it will support at the national Green Party convention. You state that the Party successfully placed candidates for Federal office on the ballot in the 2000 elections. These candidates were Ralph Nader for U.S. President and Winona LaDuke for Vice President. 1 1 The Party also has a Federal committee, the Green Party of Ohio Federal PAC, which filed its statement of organization with the Commission on January 26, 2001. The Web site address for the Party is www.ohiogreens.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Party Petition.Wpd
    NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF KENTUCKY, et al., Petitioners, v. ALISON LUNDERGAN GRIMES, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Thomas B. Bruns Robert A. Winter, Jr. Bruns, Connell, Counsel of Record Vollmer, Armstrong Law Office of Robert A. Winter, Jr. 4750 Ashwood Dr., Ste. 200 P.O. Box 175883 Cincinnati, OH 45241 Fort Mitchell, KY 41017-5883 (513) 326-0274 (859) 250-3337 [email protected] [email protected] Oliver B. Hall Center for Competitive Democracy 1835 16th Street NW #5 Washington, D.C. 20009 (202) 248-9294 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the equal protection analysis in ballot access cases, including Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 790 (1983), and Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992), incorporates a non-discrimination principle, separate and apart from the Anderson-Burdick burden analysis, as held by the Second, Third, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits, or whether the Anderson-Burdick burden analysis is the sole test for ballot access, as held by the Sixth Circuit here? 2. Whether a minor party must show its “exclusion or virtual exclusion” from the ballot to demonstrate a “severe burden” under Anderson-Burdick before strict scrutiny analysis is triggered, or whether a demonstration of significant roadblocks that extend beyond the merely inconvenient, as suggested by Justice Scalia and the Seventh Circuit, are sufficient to trigger a “severe burden” and strict scrutiny analysis? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Than 1000 Groups Work to Prevent Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana, And
    More Than 1,000 Groups Work to Prevent Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana, and Other Drug Use by Youth AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL FM GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC OH OK OR PA PR RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY NATIONAL Building Marijuana-Free Communities Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) National Families in Action Save Our Society from Drugs New York, New York Atlanta, Georgia St. Petersburg Website: www.learnaboutsam.org Phone: 404-248-9676 Phone: 727-828-0210 Website: www.nationalfamilies.org Website: www.saveoursociety.org Institute on Behavior and Health Rockville Phone: 301-231-9010 Website: http://www.ibhinc.org Back to Top ALABAMA Building Marijuana-Free Communities Shelby County Drug Free Coalition Drug Education Council in Mobile Alabaster Mobile Phone: 205-663-6301 Phone: 251-478-7855 Website: Website: http://drugeducation.org ShelbyCountyDrugFreeCoalition.org Building Drug-Free Communities Covington County Children’s Policy Escambia County Children's Policy Addiction Prevention Coalition Council Council Birmingham Andalusia Brewton Phone: 205-874-8498 Phone: 334-881-2319 Phone: 251-867-0263 Website: Website: www.childrenspolicycouncil.com http://addictionpreventioncoalition.org Safe & Healthy Homewood Homewood Phone: 205-870-4203 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SafeandHealthy Homewood Back to Top ALASKA Building Marijuana-Free Communities Big Marijuana, Big Mistake Anchorage Website: https://aws.state.ak.us/OnlinePublicNotices /Notices/Attachment.aspx?id=96758 Building Drug-Free Communities United Way of Anchorage Communities Mobilizing For A Change Community Bridges, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • "Sore Loser" Laws, and Other "Ballot Access"
    Order Code RL33678 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Substitution of Nominees on the Ballot for Congressional Office, “Sore Loser” Laws, and Other “Ballot Access” Issues September 29, 2006 Jack Maskell Legislative Attorney American Law Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Substitution of Nominees on the Ballot for Congressional Office, “Sore Loser” Laws, and Other “Ballot Access” Issues Summary In July of 2006 federal courts ruled that former Representative Tom DeLay, who had earlier won the Republican primary nomination for Congress from the 22nd District of Texas, could not have his name substituted on the general election ballot by the Republican party even if Mr. DeLay had changed his legal residence and voluntarily withdrew from the race. In Ohio, however, a different result ensued a month later when Representative Robert Ney, who had won the Republican party nomination in an earlier May primary, formally announced his withdrawal from the race on August 14, 2006, but was permitted to be replaced through a “special primary” to nominate another candidate. In Connecticut, the defeated candidate for the Democratic party nomination in the August 2006 primary, incumbent Senator Joseph Lieberman, appears to be able to be on the ballot either as an “independent” or nominee of a minor party in the general election in November, although a similar ballot position for the general election for one who had lost a party nominating primary would be barred in numerous states (including Ohio) because of the application of their so-called “sore loser” laws. Several years earlier, on September 30, 2002, former Senator Robert Torrecelli, the Democratic nominee for the United States Senate from New Jersey, voluntarily withdrew from the Senate race and, even at that late date, a new candidate was allowed to be chosen by the Democratic party in New Jersey and to have his name appear on the November ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • Félix Guattari: an Aberrant Introduction
    Félix Guattari: An Aberrant Introduction GARY GENOSKO Continuum Fe´lix Guattari: An Aberrant Introduction TRANSVERSALS NEW DIRECTIONS IN PHILOSOPHY SERIES EDITOR Keith Ansell-Pearson, University of Warwick CONSULTANT EDITORS Eric Alliez, Richard Beardsworth, Howard Caygill, Gary Genosko, Elisabeth Grosz, Michael Hardt, Diane Morgan, John Mullarkey, Paul Patton, Stanley Shostak, Isabelle Stengers, James Williams, David Wood. Transversals explores the most exciting collisions within contemporary thought, as philosophy encounters nature, materiality, time, tech- nology, science, culture, politics, art and everyday life. The series aims to present work which is both theoretically innovative and challenging, whilst retaining a commitment to rigour and clarity and to the power and precision of thought. Intensive Science & Virtual Philosophy Manuel DeLanda Fe´lix Guattari: An Aberrant Introduction Gary Genosko Political Physics: Deleuze, Derrida & the Body John Protevi Politic forthcoming Philosophy in the Age of Science & Capital Gregory Dale Adamson On an Artificial Earth: Philosophies of Nature Iain Hamilton Grant After Schelling FE´ LIX GUATTARI An Aberrant Introduction GARY GENOSKO CONTINUUM The Tower Building, 11 York Road, London SE1 7NX 370 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6503 www.continuumbooks.com First published 2002 Ą Gary Genosko 2002 Index compiled by Adam Bryx and Jerry DePiero All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0-8264-6033-X (hardback) ISBN 0-8264-6034-8 (paperback) Typeset by SetSystems Ltd, Saffron Walden, Essex Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall Contents List of Figures vii Acknowledgements viii Abbreviations ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • KPCC-KVLA-KUOR Quarterly Report APR-JUNE 2012
    Quarterly Programming Report APR-JUNE 2012 KPCC / KVLA / KUOR Date Key Synopsis Guest/Reporter Duration 4/1/2012 LAW Pasadena Police have charged a man after falsely reporting he had been robbed at gunpoint. Aguilar 2:32 4/2/2012 TRAN The California High Speed Rail Authority plans to release its updated business plan. CC :14 Pasadena police officers are listed as victims in report on the matter of the fatal shooting of 4/2/2012 LAW unarmed teen Kendrec McDade. CC :17 4/2/2012 ENV High surf hits Los Angeles and Orange Counties. CC :18 4/2/2012 RELI Jewish and Japanese elders join together for a seder in Boyle Heights. CC :17 A series of late March storms increased the snowpack in the Sierra but not enough to make up for 4/2/2012 ENV California's dry winter. CC :17 4/2/2012 ECON What's left of a big Inland Empire RV maker will go on the auction block. Cuevas :53 4/2/2012 LAW The former leader of a major Mexican drug trafficking organization was sentenced in San Diego. Hurtes :46 4/2/2012 TRAN New survey says airline performance is improving. Hurtes :51 Ma Zhengang was a junior level diplomat when he worked on President Nixon's visit to the 4/2/2012 HIST People's Republic. Joyce :50 4/2/2012 ENT The people at Lionsgate are bracing for a box office bonanza. Moran :56 The first major overhaul of Burbank's General Plan addresses noise, mobility, safety, and open 4/2/2012 SFV space issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 16-1034 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF KENTUCKY, et al., Petitioners, v. ALISON LUNDERGAN GRIMES, KENTUCKY SECRETARY OF STATE, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JONATHAN T. S ALOMON Counsel of Record KATHERINE LACY CROSBY TACHAU MEEK PLC 3600 National City Tower 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY 40202-3120 Telephone: (502) 238-9900 Telecopy: (502) 238-9910 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Respondents Alison Lundergan Grimes, in her official capacities as Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and as Chair of the State Board of Elections, and the Executive Director and Members of the State Board of Elections in their official capacities ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals properly applied this Court’s flexible Anderson-Burdick analysis in affirming that Kentucky’s long-standing ballot-access framework comports with the guarantees of the United States Constitution. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Final Report
    2018 Final Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 I. Initiating the Project ..................................................................................................................... 4 What Else Was out There ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Surveying Support ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Creating the Collaboration .................................................................................................................................... 6 II. Building While Flying ................................................................................................................... 8 Selection of Races to Cover, Where, and When ............................................................................................. 9 Selection of Debate Venues ................................................................................................................................. 10 Negotiations with the Campaigns .................................................................................................................... 10 Development
    [Show full text]