Additional Map Compilation and Review of Existing Maps in Western Tasmania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE, Record 2005/05 ENERGY and RESOURCES Additional map compilation and review of existing maps in western Tasmania Michael Vicary CONTENTS Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………… 1 New map compilations …………………………………………………………………… 3 Other revised map sheets …………………………………………………………………… 8 Extra modifications to maps revised by Corbett ……………………………………………… 10 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………… 12 References ………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Introduction 1. Standardisation of rock code mnemonics. 2. Standardisation of legend and responsibility This report documents the final phase of a project format. within the Western Tasmanian Regional Minerals Program (WTRMP) to update the geology of the 3. Reappraisal of rock unit colours. Mount Read Volcanics belt using the new WTRMP It is hoped that these changes will greatly assist the geophysical data and additional geological data from user and aid in interpretation and readability. other available sources. It supplements work commenced by Dr Keith Corbett on the reappraisal of Modifications to the MRT 1:250 000 and 1:500 000 scale the stratigraphic subdivisions of the Mount Read geological maps have been made to accommodate the Volcanics and Owen Group and correlates in western revisions to the 1:25 000 scale series. and northwestern Tasmania. All grid coordinates are referenced to AGD66 – AMG Zone 55. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the 1:25 000 scale geological map sheets reviewed and/or compiled as part of the WTRMP. These maps essentially cover all Ac knowl edg ments the areas of the Cambrian Mt Read Volcanics and/or The author wishes to acknowledge the enormous Cambrian to Ordovician Owen Group in western and contributions that Dr Keith Corbett and Mr Chris northern Tasmania and in the Adamsfield area. Map Meech made to this part of the WTRMP Project. Mrs sheets revised by Corbett have been documented in the Amanda Mayne and Ms Joanne Bowerman are following reports and maps (Corbett, 2002a,b,c; sincerely thanked for their superb cartographic efforts. Corbett, 2003a,b; Corbett, 2004; Corbett and Dr David Seymour, Dr Marcus McClengahan, Mr McClenaghan, 2003). Steve Forsyth, Mr John Everard, Dr Clive Calver and Dr David Green provided valuable professional and Thirty-two new maps were compiled and an technical advice. The support of Dr Geoff Green, Dr additional 23 existing maps were revised by this Tony Brown and Mr Ken Bird has been greatly author. Significant geological revisions to these map appreciated. sheets are documented below. In addition, a number of significant changes have been made to the final map sheets, including those reviewed by Corbett. These include: Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 2005/05 1 WICKHAM SISTER NEW YEAR EGG LAGOON PALANA ARTHURS REEKARA SALTWATER TANNER WINGAROO PATRIARCHS LOORANA SEA ELEPHANT EMITA MEMANA SELLARS CURRIE NARACOOPA Compiled and revised MJV WYBALENNA LEVENTHORPE REEF WHITEMARK LOGAN PEARSHAPE GRASSY Revised MJV CHAPPELL LOCCOTA FISHER STOKES Revised KDC BADGER ANDERSON PUNCHEON KERAUDREN ROCHON BARRETTS KERFORD THIRSTY Other existing maps as at 4 February 2005 ADAMSON CUVIER PRESERVATION PASSAGE BIRD WALKER MORIARTY GRIM ROBBINS MONTAGU STANLEY STUDLAND LYME REGIS SMITHTON CAMERON MELLA ROCKY CAPE WATERHOUSE TOMAHAWK MUSSELROE NATURALISTE MARRAWAH EAST LILEAH & WEST (2 MAPS) TOGARI MAWBANNA WYNYARD TAM O'SHANTER BRIDPORT OXBERRY MONARCH GLADSTONE EDDYSTONE TAYATEA BLUFF ROGER MILABENA CALDER BURNIE LOW HEAD WEYMOUTH BOWOOD PEARLY BROOK PIONEER LANKA ANSONS BAY PORT SORELL (NORTH & SOUTH) SUNDOWN SUMAC HOLDER FOLLY YOLLA STOWPORT ULVERSTONE DEVONPORT 2 MAPS BELL BAY RETREAT NABOWLA SCOTTSDALE DERBY SPURRS RIVULET THE GARDENS BERYL TEMMA DEMPSTER KEITH TEWKESBURY RIANA KINDRED LATROBE HARFORD BEACONSFIELD LILYDALE LISLE SPRINGFIELD RINGAROOMA BLUE TIER BINALONG BERTHA ORDNANCE BALFOUR BARETOP PARRAWE LOYETEA CASTRA RAILTON W FRANKFORD EXETER DILSTON PATERSONIA MAURICE VICTORIA PYENGANA ST HELENS DONALDSON KENNETH LILY WARATAH GUILDFORD LOONGANA WILMOT SHEFFIELD PARKHAM BRIDGENORTH LAUNCESTON NUNAMARA BEN NEVIS SADDLEBACK BRILLIANT BEAUMARIS SAVAGE RIVER JOHNSONS LAGOON LUINA PEARSE LEA CETHANA GOG DELORAINE WESTBURY PROSPECT BLESSINGTON GIBLIN MATHINNA DUBLIN TOWN FALMOUTH MEREDITH INTERVIEW RAMSAY CHARTER PENCIL PINE LIENA MOLE CREEK MONTANA CLUAN LONGFORD EVANDALE STACKS MANGANA ST MARYS IRONHOUSE LIVINGSTONE HARDWICKE PARSONS BLOCK CRADLE BORRADAILE LAKE MACKENZIE QUAMBY BLUFF LIFFEY CRESSY NILE STANHOPE ROSSARDEN FINGAL PICCANINNY STRINGER AHRBERG ROSEBERY TULLAH WILL ROWALLAN PILLANS BREONA POATINA DELMONT CLEVELAND HANLETH ST PAULS DOME ST JOHN SEYMOUR HEEMSKIRK EAST & WEST (2 MAPS) DUNDAS SELINA ACHILLES CATHEDRAL ADA SPLIT ROCK BRADYS LO O'CONNORS CONARA DIAMOND ROYS HENRY BICHENO TRIAL OCEANA TYNDALL DOME DU CANE OLIVE MIENA ARTHURS LAKE MILLERS JACOBS CAMPBELL TOWN SNOW APSLAWN LODI MALLANNA PROFESSOR GORMANSTON GOULDS OLYMPUS INA MONPEELYATA WIHAREJA PENNY ELLINTHORP ROSS LEAKE CRANBROOK FRIENDLY STRAHAN EAST & OWEN WEST (2 MAPS) COLLINGWOOD RUFUS BRONTE WADDAMANA STEPPES INTERLAKEN TUNBRIDGE MORRISTON COLONELS SWANSEA COLES BAY KELLY LISDILLON TEEPOOKANA DARWIN LODDON ARROWSMITH D?ARCYS ECHO HERMITAGE TABLE VINCENTS FADDENS TOOMS GRAHAM TABLE HEAD MAYFIELD PHILIPS ENGINEER VERA MAJORS TARRALEAH DEE CLUNY DENNISTOUN OATLANDS LEMONT ROYALTY SCHOUTEN ALBINA GRINDSTONE SARAH McCALL WARNES ALGONKIAN WAYATINAH STRICKLAND CAWOOD BOTHWELL STONOR WHITEFOORD RAVENSDALE VARNA LIMEKILN KEMPTON COLEBROOK BOUGANVILLE BIRCHS ABEL SPIRES WYLDS OUSE MONTACUTE WOODSDALE TRIABUNNA HIBBS E & W D'AGUILAR ELDERSLIE BAINS BUCKLAND DARLINGTON (2 maps) LANCELOT POKANA GORDONVALE ELLENDALE HAMILTON ORFORD ENDEAVOUR E & W (2 maps) INNES OLEGAS WINGS TIGER DOBSON BUSHY PARK BROADMARSH TEA TREE RUNNYMEDE SANDSPIT RIEDLE MOORES STRATHGORDON NEW NORFOLK RICHMOND SORELL PERON MONTGOMERY SERPENTINE ADAMSFIELD MAYDENA UXBRIDGE KELLEVIE MAINWARING OSMUND VIEW McPARTLAN BOWES SKELETON LLOYD COLLINSVALE HOBART CARLTON DUNALLEY VERIDIAN MURDUNNA NORTH & LEWIS ROOKERY SOLITARY ANNE NEVADA LONNAVALE LONGLEY TAROONA CREMORNE SOUTH (2 MAPS) KOONYA ELLIOTT PROPSTING MACONOCHIE SCOTTS WELD GLEN HUON HUONVILLE BLACKMANS BAY COMMUNICATION TARANNA CYGNET PORT ARTHUR HIPPOLYTE MULCAHY DAVEY CROSSING RAZORBACK PICTON GEEVESTON BARNES LYMINGTON GREAT BAY RAOUL TASMAN SETTLEMENT LEGGE GLOVERS BURGESS WATERLOO BOBS RAMINEA DOVER ADVENTURE BAY BREAKSEA RUGBY FEDERATION BISDEE HASTINGS PARTRIDGE FLUTED CAPE HILLIARD MEL RAY COX LOUISA PRECIPITOUS LEPRENA CLOUDY TELOPEA DE WITT PRION RECHERCHE u:\urep\2005_05\map_index_25.cdr Figure 1 1:25 000 scale geological maps updated as part of the Western Tasmanian Regional Minerals Program. Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 2005/05 2 New map compilations Ahberg produced in May, 2005. Explanatory notes are in preparation. 1. The compilation was largely based on original mapping by Brown et al. (1994), Turner et al. (1991) Cluan and Gee et al. (1969). 1. The compilation was largely based on Barton et al. 2. Modification to the Proterozoic geology at the (1969) with additional information from Matthews southern end of the Arthur Lineament was based (1983). on the interpretation of WTRMP aeromagnetic data. 2. Additional changes to the eastern edge of the map sheet will be required once the recent remapping of Bridgenorth the Longford map sheet (Forsyth, in prep.) has been compiled. 1. The compilation was largely based on Gulline et al. (1973). Collingwood 2. Several air photo and magnetic lineaments have 1. The compilation was largely based on Calver et al. been added to the map. These are typically (1987) and Gulline et al. (1963). post-Jurassic in age, but they could represent reactivated older basement structures. 2. Some modification to the Quaternary geology in the Alma River–Cardigan Flats–Cheyne Range 3. The Owen Group stratigraphy has been revised areas has been made and is largely based on air following Laurie (1996). photo interpretation. Burnie 3. The Proterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic geology is unmodified from original source material. 1. The compilation was largely based on Gee et al. (1967) and Burns (1963). Cra dle 2. Point Tertiary basalt locations are from the MRT 1. The compilation was largely based on Barton et al. geochemistry database (J. Everard, pers. comm.). (1966) and Jennings and Burns (1958). 3. The location of pillow basalt within the Burnie 2. The Permian stratigraphy was recompiled from Formation at Sulphur Creek was taken from Burns Gee and Burns (1968). (1964). 3. The distribution of Cambrian Mt Read Volcanics in Cas tra the Sumer Spur area was taken from Vicary and Pemberton (1988). 1. The compilation was largely based on Burns (1963) 4. Revisions to the Pleistocene deposits in the Cradle and Jennings et al. (1959). Mountain–Waterfall Valley area were based on air 2. The Cambrian geology has been updated from the photo interpretation with additional information original sources with additional information form from Derbyshire (1968). Vicary (1995), Vivian (1984), Corbett (2003b), 5. Minor revision was made to the Proterozoic Poltock (2002) and additional air photo and geology in the Hounslow Heath area, based on WTRMP geophysics interpretation. additional information presented in Collins et al. 3. The dominant Cambrian sequence in the Castra (1981). area has been correlated with the Western Volcano-sedimentary Sequence (Corbett, 2003b). Deloraine 4. Tyndall
Recommended publications
  • New Residents Kit Index

    New Residents Kit Index

    New Residents Kit 2017/2018 Central Highlands Council Administration Works & Services 6 Tarleton Street HAMILTON TASMANIA 7140 Phone: (03) 6286 3202 Fax: (03) 6286 3334 * * * * Development & Environmental Services 19 Alexander Street BOTHWELL TASMANIA 7030 Inside this kit: Phone: (03) 6259 5503 Fax: (03) 6259 5722 Municipal Map 3 Township 5-7 Information Disclaimer Central Highlands Council has made every endeavor to ensure that details Waste 8 are correct at the time of printing but can accept no responsibility for any inaccuracy or mis-deception contained in the publication as a result of Building/ Planning/ 8 information supplied. Plumbing Councillors 9 All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of information in this document. If there are any additions or alterations required could you Dog Registrations 9 please advise us of the correct information, in writing from an authorized person representing your organization or service. Feedback/Request 14 Form Page 2 New Residents Kit Index Welcome by Mayor ...................................................................................................................... 3 Municipal Map .............................................................................................................................. 3 About our Council ......................................................................................................................... 4 Community Development Grant Applications .................................................................................. 4 Hamilton
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage

    Hydro 4 Water Storage

    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
  • Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review PART 1 Introduction and Background Prepared for Derwent Catchment Review Steering Committee June, 2011 By Ruth Eriksen, Lois Koehnken, Alistair Brooks and Daniel Ray Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Scope and Need....................................................................................................1 2 Physical setting......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Catchment description......................................................................................................2 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology ...........................................................................................5 2.3 Rainfall and climate...........................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Current climate ............................................................................................................9 2.3.2 Future climate............................................................................................................10 2.4 Vegetation patterns ........................................................................................................12 2.5 River hydrology ...............................................................................................................12 2.5.1
  • Listing Statement

    Listing Statement

    THREATENED SPECIES LISTING STATEMENT ORCHID L iawenee greenhood Pterostylis pratensis D. L. Jones 1998 Status Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 ……………………………….……..………..………………..vulnerable Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ……………………..….….…...............Vulnerable Hans & Annie Wapstra Description December. In flower, the plants are 7 to 15 cm tall, Pterostylis pratensis belongs to a group of orchids with many closely sheathing stem leaves. They commonly known as greenhoods because the dorsal have 2 to 12 densely crowded white flowers with sepal and petals are united to form a predominantly dark green stripes. The hood apex curves down green, hood-like structure that dominates the abruptly and terminates with a short tip. The two flower. When triggered by touch, the labellum flips lateral sepals hang down and are fused to form a inwards towards the column, trapping any insect pouch below the labellum though the tips may inside the flower, thereby aiding pollination as the remain free. The labellum, which also hangs down, insect struggles to escape. Greenhoods are is whitish green, oblong with a shallowly notched deciduous terrestrials that have fleshy tubers, which tip and has an appendage that points out with a dark are replaced annually. At some stage in their life green, knob-like apex with a short, broad, blunt cycle all greenhoods produce a rosette of leaves. beak about 0.5 mm long. In all, the flowers are 7 to 8.5 mm long and 4.5 mm wide. The rosette of Pterostylis pratensis encircles the base of the flower stem. The 4 to 8 rosette leaves Its darker green and white flowers and larger leaves are dark green, crowded, and oval to circular can distinguish Pterostylis pratensis, which grows shaped with the broadest part in the middle, 25 to in montane and subalpine regions on the Central 35 mm long and 14 to 22 mm wide.
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan

    Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan

    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
  • Water Quality Commitments Factsheet

    Water Quality Commitments Factsheet

    King and Yolande Sustainability Review Outcomes and commitments Water quality and river health Sustainability reviews provide Hydro These sites were monitored in September and November Tasmania with the opportunity to evaluate 2019, and January 2020. March and May sampling did not go ahead due to impacts of COVID-19. the impacts of our hydropower operations in the catchments we operate in. Based on the Measurements of nutrients, metals and aspects necessary to information review and community support aquatic life such as dissolved oxygen, were taken at the surface and various depths to collect information on consultation we undertook baseline water quality across the lakes. monitoring on water quality and river health, and a specific study on metal loads to Lake Burbury. The outcomes and commitments regarding water quality and river health within the King and Yolande catchments are presented below. Water quality Water quality was rated as the second highest concern in the community consultation survey. Two respondents commented on pollution in the King River from mine Water quality management: Lake Burbury (source: discharge to the Queen River. Concerns regarding legacy M.Wapstra) (historic) mine discharge via Linda Creek to Lake Burbury Outcome were also raised in the information review. Water quality at both lakes Burbury and Margaret has Water quality and river health information is important to remained consistent over time. Recent data fit within historic collect for the lakes and rivers we manage. This information ranges and expectations for both sites. allows us to measure any substantial change in water quality over time and better understand our waterways.
  • Western Explorer

    Western Explorer

    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
  • UR.Lcr85"~ 56 1985/58

    UR.Lcr85"~ 56 1985/58

    UR.lcr85"~ 56 1985/58. West Coast gravity tie stations R.G. Richardson M.J. Dix This report presents absolute gravity values for a series of tie stations on the west coast of Tasmania. Intervals were measured using Worden gravity meter W913 and Sodin gravity meter S183 with a minimum of six measurements of each interval. The measured interval between Hobart Airport and Strahan Airport was in error by 2.1 ~m/sec2 and between Strahan and Smithton Airports was in error by 0.2 ~/sec2. All observed gravity values have an error of less than 1 ~/sec2. The observed gravity values are given in Table I and the station locations are shown on Figure 1. Table 1. GRAVITY TIE STATIONS, WEST COAST GRAVITY SURVEY Location Number Adjusted gravity AMG reference value (~m/sec') Ouse 8451.9004 9.8036534 476500, 5296100 Wayatinah 8451. 9005 9.8031976 460100, 5308300 (Liapootah) Tarraleah 8451. 9006 9.8024509 454550, 5316120 Bronte 8451.9007 9.8021387 457550, 5331300 Derwent Bridge 8451. 9008 9.8020928 436350, 5334650 Collingwood River 8451. 9009 9.8028353 410500, 5331450 Gormanston 8051. 9905 9.8027416 383500, 5341000 Gormanston 8551. 9975 9.8027423 383500, 5341000 (alternative) Queenstown 8451. 9010 9.8030527 378300, 5340900 Strahan 6491. 9136 9.8037169 358800, 5331700 Zeehan 8451. 9011 9.8029800 366000, 5362300 Rosebery 8051. 9906 9.8028124 378600, 5373500 Tullah 8051. 9902 9.8027489 385200, 5378200 Que River 8451. 9012 9.8017797 389450, 5393950 Que River 8551.9976 9.8017750 389550, 5393950 (alternative) Fingerpost 8451.9013 9.8018200 383400, 5412100 (Waratah) Parrawe 8451.9014 9.8019949 381400, 5427700 Yolla 8451.9015 9.8022770 392400, 5446400 Wynyard 8451.
  • Nowhere Else on Earth

    Nowhere Else on Earth

    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
  • Geochemistry of Darwin Glass and Target Rocks from Darwin Crater, Tasmania, Australia

    Geochemistry of Darwin Glass and Target Rocks from Darwin Crater, Tasmania, Australia

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 3, 479–496 (2008) AUTHOR’S Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org PROOF Geochemistry of Darwin glass and target rocks from Darwin crater, Tasmania, Australia Kieren T. HOWARD School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia Present address: Impacts and Astromaterials Research Centre, Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 1 March 2007; revision accepted 25 July 2007) Abstract–Darwin glass formed about 800,000 years ago in western Tasmania, Australia. Target rocks at Darwin crater are quartzites and slates (Siluro-Devonian, Eldon Group). Analyses show 2 groups of glass, Average group 1 is composed of: SiO2 (85%), Al2O3 (7.3%), TiO2 (0.05%), FeO (2.2%), MgO (0.9%), and K2O (1.8%). Group 2 has lower average SiO2 (81.1%) and higher average Al2O3 (8.2%). Group 2 is enriched in FeO (+1.5%), MgO (+1.3%) and Ni, Co, and Cr. Average Ni (416 ppm), Co (31 ppm), and Cr (162 ppm) in group 2 are beyond the range of sedimentary rocks. Glass and target rocks have concordant REE patterns (La/Lu = 5.9–10; Eu/Eu* = 0.55–0.65) and overlapping trace element abundances. 87Sr/86Sr ratios for the glasses (0.80778–0.81605) fall in the range (0.76481–1.1212) defined by the rock samples. ε-Nd results range from −13.57 to −15.86. Nd model ages range from 1.2–1.9 Ga (CHUR) and the glasses (1.2–1.5 Ga) fall within the range defined by the target samples.
  • TWWHA Walking Track Management Strategy 1994 Vol 1

    TWWHA Walking Track Management Strategy 1994 Vol 1

    Walking Track Management Strategy for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Volume I Main Report January 1994 1 Summary The Walking Track Management Strategy is a strategy developed by the Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service for the management of walking tracks and walkers in and adjacent to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA), in accordance with the recommendations of the World Heritage Area Management Plan. Key management issues in the region include the extensive deterioration of existing walking tracks and the unplanned development of new walking tracks in many areas. Campsite impacts, crowding, pollution and broadscale trampling damage to vegetation and soils are also creating serious problems in some areas. The Strategy has been prepared on the basis of an extensive literature survey and an inventory of tracks and track conditions throughout the WHA. Research has also been undertaken to assess usage levels, usage trends and user attitudes and characteristics throughout the WHA. The three-volume document includes: • a summary of the findings of the literature survey (section 2 and appendix B); • a description of the method used to compile the inventory of tracks and track conditions, and a summary of the findings of the inventory (section 3); • a summary of available information on usage levels, usage trends, user characteristics and attitudes and social impacts throughout the WHA (section 4 and appendix C); • an assessment of the opportunity spectrum for bushwalking in and adjacent to the WHA (section 5 and appendix
  • The Philosophers' Tale

    The Philosophers' Tale

    1 Photo: Ollie Khedun Photo: THE VISION THE CONCEPT THE PROPOSAL The Philosophers’ Tale is The West Coast Range consists The Next Iconic Walk – The of 6 mountains on a north south Philosophers’ Tale 2019 proposal more than just an iconic walk, ridge. The ridge is trisected by the – Chapter One: Owen, takes it is made up of a series of Lyell Highway (between Mt Lyell people on a journey over 28km in iconic walks to be developed and Mt Owen) and the King River 3 days and 2 nights experiencing Gorge (between Mt Huxley and Mt mountain peaks, incredible views, over a period of time. There Jukes). This makes for three distinct button grass plains, cantilever are an abundance of coastal regions, each with their own part platforms and suspension bridges walks – the Overland Track to play in telling the bigger story. over deep river gorges down into All areas have been impacted cool temperate rainforest, majestic is now mature, and people by mining exploration or other waterfalls along the tranquil King are looking for the next development in the past 100 years. River on the incredible West Coast of Tasmania. With the option to option – The Philosophers’ The area is naturally divided into finish via train, hi-rail, raft, kayak, four zones, or in story telling Tale is just that. People will helicopter or jet boat, making it a parlance, ‘Chapters’. The Chapters be drawn locally and across truly unforgettable experience. (outlined on page 8), let’s call them the globe to experience these Owen, Jukes, Lyell and Tyndall lead View West Coast video iconic walks, returning time easily to the staged construction of any proposed track works.