DOCSLIB.ORG

Women Art Revolution: Interview with Suzanne Lacy Interviewed by Lynn Hershman Date Unknown Location Unknown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women Art Revolution: Interview with Suzanne Lacy Interviewed by Lynn Hershman Date Unknown Location Unknown !Women Art Revolution: Interview with Suzanne Lacy Interviewed by Lynn Hershman Date unknown Location unknown Suzanne Lacy: So, history. I got involved with feminism first in the late 60s I went to Washington and ran into some women from the Women’s Psychological . .American Psychological Association and. .you don’t want this detailed. Lynn Hershman: Talk about Fresno and how you got into the program. SL: I was a psychology grad student and I met Faith Wilding at Fresno State and feminism was just starting to happen. I Brought Back my version of it from the east coast and Faith and I decided to organize the Fresno State campus, so we called a meeting one night, not knowing who would come, just put up signs all over campus and 50 women showed up, looking at us quite expectantly. LH: What did the sign say? SL: Signs just said something about—Women, come. .you know. .explore your rights. Something like that. Women Unite sort of poster, and we sort of looked at each other. We didn’t know what to do, and we kind of whispered and decided to talk aBout sex, Because that’s what women always talked aBout. And it was a galvanizing meeting. Women loved it, and they spent 2-3 hours talking about it. And that’s basically how the feminist movement at Fresno State got started. LH: Was that after Judy Chicago was there or Before? SL: Before. About the same time Judy was organizing. .can I look at Lynn? !Women Art Revolution is a digital collection presented by Stanford University Libraries http://lib.stanford.edu/women-art-revolution Page 1 About the time Faith and I were doing that. [interruption] Faith Wilding and I met at Fresno State when I was in graduate school, and we decided that we were going to sort of launch the feminist movement at Fresno State, so we put up signs all over campus and invited women to come and meet with us . .suBject unknown. And we were incredibly shocked. Fifty women showed up, and there they sat looking at us expectantly and we had really not prepared for this at all. So, we quickly strategized and came up with the topic of sex, and we figured that that would interest the women, and indeed it did, and so the feminist movement at Fresno State was launched. We began organizing and holding meetings. About this same time, Judy Chicago had come from Los Angeles and was negotiating with the art department who wanted her to teach. And she said she would as long as they would do a feminist art program. And she in mind an experimental program with women to train them to be conscious, politicized, women artists. And I’m not sure she knew what all that meant yet. She was still reading furiously. And you rememBer, this was the end of the 60s. So, the movement was still very new. There were, I rememBer, at that time two Books—Born Female and Feminine Mystique, and de Beauvoir’s book. Those were the only Books available anyplace. So, it was a very early time. So, Judy set up interviews and was interviewing women to let them into the program and Faith said, You like to draw even though you’re a grad student in psychology, you’re interested in art, why don’t you come do this? And I said, Great. And, so I interviewed and at the end of the interview Judy said, Well, you know, it seems to me like you’re on a professional track to psychology. And I said, Well, yeah, but I just wrote a 30-page paper on creativity and I’m interested in it and she said, Well, I don’t want you in the program Because you’re not going to Be a professional artist. Which is really the joke that Judy and I continue to share aBout her particular judgment aBout character, because of all the people that she worked with, Faith and I are probably the ones that have stayed most visiBle as artists over the years, and as feminist artists. She finally relented after Faith worked on her for three or four months, and that Fall let me into the program. And I Basically aBandoned my graduate studies in psychology and threw myself into this program, still working on my degree in psychology and sociology, But Basically worked Judy, Faith and a group of fifteen other women. And we started the first feminist art program. I don’t know if you want me to go into that. LH: MayBe you could talk aBout what the philosophy was. !Women Art Revolution is a digital collection presented by Stanford University Libraries http://lib.stanford.edu/women-art-revolution Page 2 SL: I think Judy proBaBly articulates this better than I do, but I think what she had in mind, and what evolved what to Be the guiding philosophy of the feminist art program was to create a space apart, where women uncover their . the realities of their experience and kind of put their experience into synch with their awareness of who they were, Because the idea was that women’s identity was pretty much given culturally, and that identity could Be shaped. .the true authentic identity could be shaped by pulling out experience, essentially. So, in that sense it really set the tone for the kind of deconstructionist feminist theories that came later. We said that Basically a female identity is a created identity, it’s a manufactured identity. But, we believed that, but we also believed that there was a true identity and that that was to be found in experience. So, the dilemma was, How do you dig up the experience? And in sharing it and in consciousness raising groups does that reflect and mirror that experience back in the way that you begin to see who you are? And of course the project was always intensely political Because, rememBer the personal is political. What that meant was that my experience as a woman, if I was raped, if I sat in a group and found that five others out of ten had Been, there was a political implication to my private experience. So, that’s Basically, I think there were other tenants that all related to that, having to do with. Having to do with reinvestigating or re-exploring women’s history. I rememBer the . Nancy Yodelman came dashing into one of our round taBle discussions one day, with this Book. It was this old Book from the 1890s and she said, Look at this, there was a woman’s Building in Chicago in 1893 at the worlds fair and we all just fell upon the Book and devoured it. And we were really, we had. one portion of the program was art making and one portion was consciousness raising and one portion was educating ourselves on feminist art history. And reading aBout all the painters of the past and so on with kind of a renewed vision. So it was it a revisionist, sort of where the notion of revisionist history from a feminist perspective also began. Not necessarily in Chicago, But within that whole. .not necessarily in the feminist art program in Fresno, But at that point in time across the country there were some few experiments of this nature going on. I think there was one or two in New York, of different natures, But they seemed. .the experimenting seemed to Be strongest in an educational institution. SuBsequent to that, in Los Angeles there was a protest of the Art and Technology show that Maurice Tuckman put on By women who said, of seventy five artists, one is a woman? There’s a proBlem here. So women protested. Linda Nochlin’s exhiBition came out of that, as a raft of organizing in Los Angeles about that time. That was while we were in Fresno. All of this was sort of happening simultaneously or when we first came to CalArts. Judy’s program in Fresno transferred to CalArts the second year, and then Miriam Schapiro got involved with it. In Los Angeles there was a protest, there . Woman’s Space gallery was opened in downtown LA and Judy was involved in that and . Sheila came to Fresno, visited us there and was interested in starting a design program at CalArts, and she asked me to Be her teaching assistant. That’s how Sheila got involved with the whole thing. !Women Art Revolution is a digital collection presented by Stanford University Libraries http://lib.stanford.edu/women-art-revolution Page 3 Anyway, a lot of organizing happening in the city of Los Angeles with women. It was a very powerful moment in time. Faith Wilding’s Book By Her Own Hands really details this whole history, and then Judy’s program, which came from Fresno to CalArts the next year. .how much detail about CalArts? LH: What happened after. .just the major points? SL: So, we went to CalArts and I was with Sheila in the design program, and I was sort of supposed to lead the feminist theory and the consciousness raising, and Sheila led the design and we were sort of co- teaching. And then there was the art program and Judy was off with Mimi doing Womanhouse. The design program was quite interesting because this took these ideas that were percolating all through CalArts and began to put them into informational context Because in graphic design you’re interested in communication, so we used video, we used Broadsheets, we used Books, printing, and every one of our projects were focused on taking private and making public.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sabbatical Leave Report 2019 – 2020
    Sabbatical Leave Report 2019 – 2020 James MacDevitt, M.A. Associate Professor of Art History and Visual & Cultural Studies Director, Cerritos College Art Gallery Department of Art and Design Fine Arts and Communications Division Cerritos College January 2021 Table of Contents Title Page i Table of Contents ii Sabbatical Leave Application iii Statement of Purpose 35 Objectives and Outcomes 36 OER Textbook: Disciplinary Entanglements 36 Getty PST Art x Science x LA Research Grant Application 37 Conference Presentation: Just Futures 38 Academic Publication: Algorithmic Culture 38 Service and Practical Application 39 Concluding Statement 40 Appendix List (A-E) 41 A. Disciplinary Entanglements | Table of Contents 42 B. Disciplinary Entanglements | Screenshots 70 C. Getty PST Art x Science x LA | Research Grant Application 78 D. Algorithmic Culture | Book and Chapter Details 101 E. Just Futures | Conference and Presentation Details 103 2 SABBATICAL LEAVE APPLICATION TO: Dr. Rick Miranda, Jr., Vice President of Academic Affairs FROM: James MacDevitt, Associate Professor of Visual & Cultural Studies DATE: October 30, 2018 SUBJECT: Request for Sabbatical Leave for the 2019-20 School Year I. REQUEST FOR SABBATICAL LEAVE. I am requesting a 100% sabbatical leave for the 2019-2020 academic year. Employed as a fulltime faculty member at Cerritos College since August 2005, I have never requested sabbatical leave during the past thirteen years of service. II. PURPOSE OF LEAVE Scientific advancements and technological capabilities, most notably within the last few decades, have evolved at ever-accelerating rates. Artists, like everyone else, now live in a contemporary world completely restructured by recent phenomena such as satellite imagery, augmented reality, digital surveillance, mass extinctions, artificial intelligence, prosthetic limbs, climate change, big data, genetic modification, drone warfare, biometrics, computer viruses, and social media (and that’s by no means meant to be an all-inclusive list).
    [Show full text]
  • Martha Wilson Interview Part III the Franklin Furnace Programs
    Martha Wilson Interview Part III The Franklin Furnace Programs SANT: When you first organized Franklin Furnace, your main activity was collecting artist books and showing them to the public. How did you start your performance program? WILSON: Our thought was that the same artists who were publishing these books could be invited to read their published stuff, the stuff that we had in the collection. SANT: Isn’t this similar to the many public book readings that happen at many mainstream bookstores Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/dram/article-pdf/49/1 (185)/80/1821483/1054204053327789.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 now? WILSON: But not at the time! No. SANT: Readings in bookstores have been around for quite sometime, haven’t they? I mean, if we go to a different place and time other than New York in the mid-s, such as San Francisco in the mid- s with the Beats, and Lawrence Ferlinghetti and the City Lights Bookstore in San Francisco, and Allen Ginsberg reading Howl ... WILSON: That’s absolutely right. OK. SANT: Were you building on anything like that? Were you aware of such things or were you reinvent- ing the wheel? WILSON: Reinventing the wheel, I would say. I was not focused on the performance program at all because my friend Jacki Apple was my coconspirator and curator. We had already collaborated on a per- formance work in . I was living in Canada at that time. SANT: What had you done together before Franklin Furnace? WILSON: We started corresponding because Lucy Lippard had come to Halifax and introduced us through the catalog to an exhibition that existed only on notecards, about ,.
    [Show full text]
  • All These Post-1965 Movements Under the “Conceptual Art” Umbrella
    All these post-1965 movements under the “conceptual art” umbrella- Postminimalism or process art, Site Specific works, Conceptual art movement proper, Performance art, Body Art and all combinations thereof- move the practice of art away from art-as-autonomous object, and art-as-commodification, and towards art-as-experience, where subject becomes object, hierarchy between subject and object is critiqued and intersubjectivity of artist, viewer and artwork abounds! Bruce Nauman, Live-Taped Video Corridor, 1970, Conceptual Body art, Postmodern beginning “As opposed to being viewers of the work, once again they are viewers in it.” (“Subject as Object,” p. 199) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IrqXiqgQBo A Postmodern beginning: Body art and Performance art as critique of art-as-object recap: -Bruce Nauman -Vito Acconci focus on: -Chris Burden -Richard Serra -Carolee Schneemann - Hannah Wilke Chapter 3, pp. 114-132 (Carolee Schneemann and Hannah Wilke, First Generation Feminism) Bruce Nauman, Bouncing Two Balls Between the Floor and Ceiling with Changing Rhythms, 1967-1968. 16mm film transferred to video (black and white, sound), 10 min. Body art/Performance art, Postmodern beginning- performed elementary gestures in the privacy of his studio and documented them in a variety of media Vito Acconci, Following Piece, 1969, Body art, Performance art- outside the studio, Postmodern beginning Video documentation of the event Print made from bite mark Vito Acconci, Trademarks, 1970, Body art, Performance art, Postmodern beginning Video and Print documentation
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Cyberfeminism
    AUTHOR’S COPY | AUTORENEXEMPLAR Revisiting cyberfeminism SUSANNA PAASONEN E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the early 1990s, cyberfeminism surfaced as an arena for critical analyses of the inter-connections of gender and new technology Ϫ especially so in the context of the internet, which was then emerging as something of a “mass-medium”. Scholars, activists and artists interested in media technol- ogy and its gendered underpinnings formed networks and groups. Conse- quently, they attached altering sets of meaning to the term cyberfeminism that ranged in their take on, and identifications with feminism. Cyberfemi- nist activities began to fade in the early 2000s and the term has since been used by some as synonymous with feminist studies of new media Ϫ yet much is also lost in such a conflation. This article investigates the histories of cyberfeminism from two interconnecting perspectives. First, it addresses the meanings of the prefix “cyber” in cyberfeminism. Second, it asks what kinds of critical and analytical positions cyberfeminist networks, events, projects and publications have entailed. Through these two perspectives, the article addresses the appeal and attraction of cyberfeminism and poses some tentative explanations for its appeal fading and for cyberfeminist activities being channelled into other networks and practiced under dif- ferent names. Keywords: cyberfeminism, gender, new technology, feminism, networks Introduction Generally speaking, cyberfeminism signifies feminist appropriation of information and computer technology (ICT) on a both practical and theoretical level. Critical analysis and rethinking of gendered power rela- tions related to digital technologies has been a mission of scholars but equally Ϫ and vocally Ϫ that of artists and activists, and those working in-between and across such categorizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Contemporary
    of formalist distance upon which modernists had relied for understanding the world. Critics increasingly pointed to a correspondence between the formal properties of 1960s art and the nature of the radically changing world that sur- rounded them. In fact formalism, the commitment to prior- itizing formal qualities of a work of art over its content, was being transformed in these years into a means of discovering content. Leo Steinberg described Rauschenberg’s work as “flat- bed painting,” one of the lasting critical metaphors invented 1 in response to the art of the immediate post-World War II Discovering the Contemporary period.5 The collisions across the surface of Rosenquist’s painting and the collection of materials on Rauschenberg’s surfaces were being viewed as models for a new form of realism, one that captured the relationships between people and things in the world outside the studio. The lesson that formal analysis could lead back into, rather than away from, content, often with very specific social significance, would be central to the creation and reception of late-twentieth- century art. 1.2 Roy Lichtenstein, Golf Ball, 1962. Oil on canvas, 32 32" (81.3 1.1 James Rosenquist, F-111, 1964–65. Oil on canvas with aluminum, 10 86' (3.04 26.21 m). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 81.3 cm). Courtesy The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. New Movements and New Metaphors Purchase Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Alex L. Hillman and Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (both by exchange). Acc. n.: 473.1996.a-w. Artists all over the world shared U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive
    Article Dear Sister Artist: Activating Feminist Art Letters and Ephemera in the Archive Kathy Carbone ABSTRACT The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The CalArts Feminist Art Program (1971–1975) played an influential role in this movement and today, traces of the Feminist Art Program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection. Through a series of short interrelated archives stories, this paper explores some of the ways in which women responded to and engaged the Collection, especially a series of letters, for feminist projects at CalArts and the Women’s Art Library at Goldsmiths, University of London over the period of one year (2017–2018). The paper contemplates the archive as a conduit and locus for current day feminist identifications, meaning- making, exchange, and resistance and argues that activating and sharing—caring for—the archive’s feminist art histories is a crucial thing to be done: it is feminism-in-action that not only keeps this work on the table but it can also give strength and definition to being a feminist and an artist. Carbone, Kathy. “Dear Sister Artist,” in “Radical Empathy in Archival Practice,” eds. Elvia Arroyo- Ramirez, Jasmine Jones, Shannon O’Neill, and Holly Smith. Special issue, Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3. ISSN: 2572-1364 INTRODUCTION The 1970s Feminist Art movement continues to serve as fertile ground for contemporary feminist inquiry, knowledge sharing, and art practice. The California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) Feminist Art Program, which ran from 1971 through 1975, played an influential role in this movement and today, traces and remains of this pioneering program reside in the CalArts Institute Archives’ Feminist Art Materials Collection (henceforth the “Collection”).
    [Show full text]
  • VITO ACCONCI Born 1940 Bronx, New York
    GRIEDER CONTEMPORARY VITO ACCONCI born 1940 Bronx, New York. Lives and works in Brooklyn, NY. 1962 Bachelor of Arts, Holy Cross College, Worcester, Massachusetts, US 1964 Master of Fine Arts, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, US Solo Exhibitions (selected) 2014 Vito Acconci: Now and Then, Grieder Contemporary, Zurich, CH 2012 Vito Acconci: Vito Acconci, Rhona Hoffman Gallery, Chicago, US 2011 Vito Acconi, Galleria Fumagalli, Bergamo, IT 2010 AAA Talk Vito Acconci + Ai Weiwei: Artist in Conversation, Agnès b. Cinema, Wanchai, HK Early Works – Vito Acconci, Basis Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, DE Coinvolgimenti – Castello di Rivoli Museo d'Arte Contemporanea, Turin, IT Lobby-For-The-Time-Being, Bronx Museum of the Arts (BxMA), New York City, NY Le Corps Comme Sculpture – Vito Acconci, Musée Auguste Rodin, Paris, FR 2009 Vito Acconci: Language Works – Video, audio and poetry, Argos, Brussels, BE 2008 Vigilancia y control, Centro de Arte La regenta, las Palmas de Gran Canaria, ES Power Fields: Explorations in the Work of Vito Acconci, Slought Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, US 2005 Self/Sound/City, Foundation for Art and Creative Technology (FACT), Liverpool, UK Vito Hannibal Acconci Studio, Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona, ES; Centro Atlantico de Arte Moderno, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, ES; Stedelijk, Amsterdam, NL 2004 Diary of a Body, Gladstone Gallery, New York, NY Vito Hannibal Acconci Studio, Musee des Beaux Artes, Nantes, FR; MACBA, Barcelona, ES 2003 Rehearsals for Architecture, Kenny Schachter Rove, Perry St., New York, NY, US Acconci Studio – Slipping into the 21st Century, Pratt–Manhattan Gallery, New York, NY, US 2002 Vito Acconci/Acconci Studio: Acts Of Architecture, Milwaukee Museum of Art (Traveled to Aspen Art Museum, Miami Museum of Art 2001,Contemporary Art Museum Houston 2001) 2001 Vito Acconci, 11 Duke Street, London, UK Vito Acconci / Acconci Studio, Architectural Models, The Institute for the Cooperatic Research, New York, US, and Paris, FR Built, Unbuilt, Unbuildable.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Martha Wilson, 2017 May 17-18
    Oral history interview with Martha Wilson, 2017 May 17-18 Funding for this interview was provided by the Lichtenberg Family Foundation. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a recorded interview with Martha Wilson on May 17 and 18, 2017. The interview took place at Wilson's home in Brooklyn, NY, and was conducted by Liza Zapol for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Martha Wilson and Liza Zapol have reviewed the transcript. Their corrections and emendations appear below in brackets with initials. This transcript has been lightly edited for readability by the Archives of American Art. The reader should bear in mind that they are reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview LIZA ZAPOL: Okay, so this is Liza Zapol for the Archives of American Art, [Smithsonian Institution] oral history program. It's May 17, 2017. And if I can ask you to introduce yourself, please? MARTHA WILSON: My name is Martha Wilson, and I'm going to not hold anything back. LIZA ZAPOL: Thank you. And we're here at your home in Brooklyn. So, if I can just ask you to begin at the beginning— MARTHA WILSON: Okay. LIZA ZAPOL: —as I said. MARTHA WILSON: Okay. LIZA ZAPOL: Where and when were you born? And if you can tell me a little bit about your early memories. MARTHA WILSON: Okay. I was born in Philadelphia in Philadelphia General Hospital or something like that, and raised for the first six years of my life on a houseboat.
    [Show full text]
  • Object/Poems: Alison Knowles's Feminist Archite(X)
    JAMES FUENTES 55 Delancey Street New York, NY 10002 (212) 577-1201 [email protected] Nicole L. Woods Some visits later I arrived at his door with eleven color swatches…[Duchamp] chose one and set it aside on the buffet. After lunch, his wife Teeny picked up Object/Poems: the swatch and said, “Oh Marcel, when did you do this?” He smiled, took a pen- Alison Knowles’s cil and signed the swatch. The following year Marcel died. Arturo Schwarz wrote Feminist me suggesting I had the last readymade. Teeny and Richard Hamilton assured me Archite(x)ture that I did not, but that I had a piece of interesting memorabilia.4 You see you have to get right into it, as This brief experience with one of the most you do with any good book, and you must prolific and influential artists of the twen- become involved and experience it your- tieth century was but one of many chance self. Then you will know something and encounters that would characterize Knowles’s feel something. Let us say that it provides artistic practice for more than four decades. a milieu for your experience but what you The experience of seeing the readymade pro- bring to it is the biggest ingredient, far cess up close served to reaffirm her sense of more important than what is there. the exquisite possibilities of unintentional —Alison Knowles 1 choices, artistic and otherwise. Indeed, Knowles’s chance-derived practice throughout the 1960s and 1970s consistently sought to The world of objects is a kind of book, in frame a collection of sensorial data in vari- which each thing speaks metaphorically ous manifestations: from language-based of all others…and is read with the whole notational scores and performances to objet body, in and through the movements and trouvé experiments within her lived spaces, displacements which define the space of computer-generated poems, and large-scale objects as much as they are defined by it.
    [Show full text]
  • “My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art.
    [Show full text]
  • NO BINGO for FELONS Arcadia University Art Gallery Exhibition Checklist August 28 – November 3, 2013 Height Precedes Width Precedes Depth
    NO BINGO FOR FELONS Arcadia University Art Gallery Exhibition Checklist August 28 – November 3, 2013 Height precedes width precedes depth. Frank Bender Anna Duval 1977 fiberglass, clay, paint, wig 12” x 8" x 10” Courtesy of Frank Bender Forensics, LLC World-renowned forensic artist Frank Bender began his career without any formal training in forensics. As a graduate of the Pennsylvania Academy and an artist interested in anatomy, he had the opportunity to see the remains of an unidentified crime victim presented to him by a medical examiner. Studying the victim, he believed he could render a reliable sculptural likeness solely from the remains. His attempt, included in this exhibition—Bender’s first reconstruction— eventually led to the successful identification of murder victim Anna Duval by a New Jersey State Police detective. It is one of dozens of busts by Bender that proved instrumental in solving crimes, demonstrating his uncanny instincts both with rendering the body as well as the psychology of the subjects with which he worked. Jennifer Bolande The Porn Series 1982/83 black and white photography 16” x 20" framed Courtesy of the artist Bloande's Porn Series is described by the artist as "cropped stills from 50s retro porn films by Irving Klaw. Watching them really fast, I noticed these ​ ​ ​ ​ moments of calm at the beginning or the end, with all of this ‘activity’ in between. It was this kind of aporia, with just an empty set, before that particular kind of narrative ride takes place." In these noir-ish images we see the spaces between transgression.
    [Show full text]
  • I – Introduction
    QUEERING PERFORMATIVITY: THROUGH THE WORKS OF ANDY WARHOL AND PERFORMANCE ART by Claudia Martins Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 I never fall apart, because I never fall together. Andy Warhol The Philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and Back again CEU eTD Collection CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS..........................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................v ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................vi CHAPTER 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2 - Bringing the body into focus...................................................................13 CHAPTER 3 - XXI century: Era of (dis)embodiment......................................................17 Disembodiment in Virtual Spaces ..........................................................18 Embodiment Through Body Modification................................................19 CHAPTER 4 - Subculture: Resisting Ajustment ............................................................22 CHAPTER 5 - Sexually Deviant Bodies........................................................................24 CHAPTER 6 - Performing gender.................................................................................29
    [Show full text]