Winter 2018 Reproductive Health Care
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
June Highlights in Women's History
National Women's History Project Please feel free to use this information in any of your newsletters or forward it to colleagues or other interested parties. Visit the Calendar section of the www.nwhp.org for a year-round calendar and don’t forget to friend us on Facebook! 730 Second Street #469 | Santa Rosa, CA | 95402 | http://www.nwhp.org | (707) 636-2888 | [email protected] June Highlights in US Women’s History June 1, 1993 Connie Chung becomes the second woman to co-anchor the evening news, 17 years after Barbara Walters became the first in 1976 June 9, 1949 Georgia Neese Clark confirmed as the first woman treasurer of the United States June 10, 1963 Equal Pay Act enacted: “To prohibit discrimination on account of sex in the payment of wages by employers engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” (PL 88-38) June 11, 1913 Women in Illinois celebrate passage of a state woman suffrage bill allowing women to vote in presidential elections June 17, 1873 Susan B. Anthony’s trial starts for illegally voting in Rochester, New York on November 5, 1872 June 20, 1921 Alice Robertson ((R-Oklahoma) becomes the first woman to chair the House of Representatives June 21, 1997 The Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) plays its first game June 23, 1972 Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is signed by President Nixon, one of the most important legislation initiatives passed for women and girls since women won the vote in 1920. This legislation guarantees equal access and equal opportunity for females and males in -
Selected Highlights of Women's History
Selected Highlights of Women’s History United States & Connecticut 1773 to 2015 The Permanent Commission on the Status of Women omen have made many contributions, large and Wsmall, to the history of our state and our nation. Although their accomplishments are too often left un- recorded, women deserve to take their rightful place in the annals of achievement in politics, science and inven- Our tion, medicine, the armed forces, the arts, athletics, and h philanthropy. 40t While this is by no means a complete history, this book attempts to remedy the obscurity to which too many Year women have been relegated. It presents highlights of Connecticut women’s achievements since 1773, and in- cludes entries from notable moments in women’s history nationally. With this edition, as the PCSW celebrates the 40th anniversary of its founding in 1973, we invite you to explore the many ways women have shaped, and continue to shape, our state. Edited and designed by Christine Palm, Communications Director This project was originally created under the direction of Barbara Potopowitz with assistance from Christa Allard. It was updated on the following dates by PCSW’s interns: January, 2003 by Melissa Griswold, Salem College February, 2004 by Nicole Graf, University of Connecticut February, 2005 by Sarah Hoyle, Trinity College November, 2005 by Elizabeth Silverio, St. Joseph’s College July, 2006 by Allison Bloom, Vassar College August, 2007 by Michelle Hodge, Smith College January, 2013 by Andrea Sanders, University of Connecticut Information contained in this book was culled from many sources, including (but not limited to): The Connecticut Women’s Hall of Fame, the U.S. -
PREGNANCY and CHILDBEARING Among U.S
PREGNANCY AND CHILDBEARING Among U.S. Teens In 2011, the teen birth rate in the United States fell most developed countries in the world, including to the lowest level recorded in nearly 70 years of Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, tracking teen childbearing. While the drop in U.S. Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and teen birth rates is good news, a significant number Sweden (“Birth, Abortion…,” 2006). of American teens have unintended pregnancies • We know that 86 percent of the decline through each year, yielding negative outcomes for teenage 2002 was a result of improved contraceptive parents, their children, and society in general. For use and the use of more effective contraceptive example, teenage mothers are more likely to drop out methods among sexually active teenagers, of high school and live in poverty, and their children and 14 percent of this decline was attributable frequently experience health and developmental to increased abstinence (Santelli et al., 2007). problems (Barnet et al., 2004; Breheny & Stephens, Another study pointed out that another cause 2007; Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family for the reduction of teen pregnancy was that Statistics, 2011; Hofferth et al., 2001; Hoffman, adolescents were increasingly substituting other 2006; Hoffman and Maynard, 2008). While millions kinds of sexual activity for vaginal intercourse of American families struggle individually with the (Weiss & Bullough, 2004). emotional and economic challenges that unintended pregnancy can bring, teen pregnancy poses a The teen pregnancy rate is currently at its lowest level significant financial burden to society at large — an in nearly 40 years, but it is still problematic. -
The Countermajoritarian Paradox
Michigan Law Review Volume 93 Issue 6 1995 The Countermajoritarian Paradox Neal Davis College of William & Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Neal Davis, The Countermajoritarian Paradox, 93 MICH. L. REV. 1433 (1995). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol93/iss6/14 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE COUNTERMAJORITARIAN PARADOX Neal Devins* LIBERTY AND SEXUALITY: TEE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND THE MAKNG OF ROE V. WADE. By DavidJ. Garrow. New York: Mac- millan Publishing Co. 1994. Pp. 981. $28. In 1970, judicial recognition of abortion rights seemed far- fetched. In January of that year, Linda Greenhouse wrote in the New York Times Magazine about a "right to abortion" - describ- ing "[s]uch a notion... [as] fantastic, illusory. The Constitution is searched in vain for any mention of it. The very phrase rings of the rhetoric of a Women's Liberation meeting."' While Greenhouse's bit of hyperbole was a setup to one of the first full-blown popular press treatments of burgeoning judicial recognition of abortion rights, no one could have foreseen the prospect of a sweeping Supreme Court decision invalidating forty-six state antiabortion laws - at least not in 1970. -
Success on Tap Alisa Bowens-Mercado Is a Brewing Pioneer
SEASONS of AUTUMN 2020 SEASONS OF NEW HAVEN SEASONS NEW HAVEN SUCCESS ON TAP ALISA BOWENS-MERCADO IS A BREWING PIONEER FUR-EVER FRIENDS LOVE CONQUERS ALL WHAT TO KNOW BEFORE WEDDINGS IN THE AGE AUTUMN 2020 AUTUMN ADOPTING A PET OF COVID Where customer focus meets community focus. Serving you and the community. Today and tomorrow. On Your Terms. We offer personal and business banking, great lending rates, and online and mobile banking. We help you look to the future with retirement savings and other services to help you thrive. Many things have changed over the past few months, but Seabury’s commitment to community We volunteer over 14,000 hours annually. The Liberty Bank Foundation is remains stronger than ever. We are ready for any situation, both on campus and off. While many all about giving back with grants, scholarships and funding for education. new protocols present unique challenges, our staff, residents and members have come together to keep everyone safe, healthy and connected. We’d love to meet you! We’re still welcoming new neighbors on campus and new members to our At Home program. Visit liberty-bank.com to learn more about us or call us to make an We’re observing social distancing with outdoor meetings, model homes designed exclusively for safe tours and promoting virtual tours. Most importantly, no one is going through this alone. As appointment at any of our branches across Connecticut. a Seabury resident or Seabury At Home member, you not only secure your future healthcare, you also become part of a community that bands together at times when it’s most needed. -
Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Anti-Choice Anti-Abortion Faith-Based Fake Clinics With
Crisis Pregnancy Centers are anti-choice anti-abortion faith-based fake clinics with NO OVERSIGHT Financial oversight of taxpayer-funded pregnancy resource centers is severely lacking. In some states no one has any idea where the money given to these centers is going or how it being spent. NO HONESTY CPCs deliberately lie about the medical effects of abortions and about how far women are into their pregnancy so they think they have more time to make a choice about abortion than they actually do. NO CHOICES They advise women who have been sexually assaulted not to use emergency contraception. Beyond this, they won’t suggest ANY women use contraception for health issues or to prevent pregnancy. NO PRIVACY CPCs collect the same detailed personal medical information as a clinic but are not required to keep it private, like a doctor’s office is. They reserve the right to reveal or sell personal info for “morally compelling” reasons. NO SEPARATION These are faith-based organizations that oppose abortion. They have religious missions and say they “express the love of Jesus Christ.” Funding them with taxpayer money is a clear violation of separation of church and state. Crisis Pregnancy Centers (or Pregnancy Counseling Centers) mislead and coerce people facing unintended pregnancies who believe that they are visiting a neutral and objective medical facility. Know the facts: • There are around 4,000 of these operations across the United States. • They position themselves as small, local, and volunteer-run, but more than 70% are affiliated with large, well-resourced networks providing funding and legal muscle. -
The Irreplaceable Role of Planned Parenthood Health Centers
The Irreplaceable Role of Planned Parenthood Health Centers Planned Parenthood is a leading provider of high-quality, affordable health care for women, men, and young people, and the nation’s largest provider of sex education. Planned Parenthood health centers provided millions of people in the U.S. with contraception, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), lifesaving cancer screenings, and safe, legal abortion. At least one in five women has relied on a Planned Parenthood health center for care in her lifetime. • In 2017, Planned Parenthood health centers saw 2.4 million patients and provided more than 4.7 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted infections, nearly 300,000 breast exams, more than 270,000 Pap tests, and birth control to nearly 2 million people. • Planned Parenthood leads the country with the most up-to-date medical standards and guidelines for reproductive health care and uses clinical research to advance health care delivery to reach more people in need of care. • Fifty-six percent (56%) of Planned Parenthood health centers are in health professional shortage areas, rural or medically underserved areas. Planned Parenthood health centers provide primary and preventive health care to many who otherwise would have nowhere to turn for family planning care. • More than one-third (39%) of Planned Parenthood patients are people of color, with more than 560,000 patients who identify as Latino and nearly 390,000 patients who identify as Black. • Of Planned Parenthood patients who report their income, nearly 75 percent live with incomes at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and at least 60 percent of Planned Parenthood patients access care through the Medicaid program and/or the Title X family planning program. -
50 Years After the Griswold Vs. Connecticut Decision June 2015 in 1965, the Supreme Court Held in Griswold V
GRISWOLD ANNIVERSARY • FACT SHEET FACT SHEET 50 Years After the Griswold vs. Connecticut Decision June 2015 In 1965, the Supreme Court held in Griswold v. Connecticut, that a married couple’s right to privacy includes the right to use birth control.1 This important case was one of the first steps that enabled women to access birth control legally, and in doing so, gave women greater opportunity to plan their families and lives. Furthermore, the Griswold case laid the foundation for a broad array of rights that shape Americans’ lives to this day, including rights related to birth control, child rearing, marriage, family relations, and intimacy. THE GRISWOLD CASE In 1961, Estelle Griswold opened a Planned Parenthood clinic in New Haven, Connecticut. At that time, Connecticut had a law criminalizing the distribution of birth control to married people. Griswold and the clinic’s doctor were arrested for, and ultimately convicted of, providing information and advice about birth control to married couples.2 They appealed their conviction on the grounds that the Connecticut law violated their patients’ rights under the Constitution. In 1965, the Supreme Court agreed with them and struck down the Connecticut law. In Griswold, the Court identified a “zone of privacy created “Would we allow the police to search the by several fundamental constitutional guarantees.”3 Recog- sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for nizing the importance of privacy to marriage, the Court telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? invalidated Connecticut’s attempt to prohibit married The very idea is repulsive to the notions of couples from using birth control. -
Community Resource Guide to Pregnancy Health and Services New Orleans, LA
Community Resource Guide to Pregnancy Health and Services New Orleans, LA Artist: Marci Mathew This guide is dedicated to the health of our NOLA families and their little ones. Welcome: New Orleans community elder and former midwife, Mama Jamilah Peters-Muhammad, of the Ashe Cultural Arts Center, asks pregnant women a simple, yet empowering question answered with an empowering, yet simple answer, “Who is birthing your baby? …YOU ARE!” Planned Parenthood and our community partners, dedicated to addressing healthy pregnancy outcomes for women of our community, offer this guide as our commitment to providing information on your rights and options for quality prenatal care. The United States has the highest rates of infant mortality and low birth weight babies of any industrialized country. The state of Louisiana ranks 49th in infant mortality and low birth weight babies. Low birth weight babies are 24 times more likely to die during infancy than normal weight babies. African American women are disproportionately affected due to persisting health care disparities and have the highest rate of low birth weight babies in Louisiana. (CDC Vital and Health Statistics Report, 2009). Together we can change this reality, one healthy pregnancy at a time. Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast: “Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast is a leading non-profit provider of reproductive health care, sexuality education and advocacy for reproductive health rights. We’ve been working in Louisiana for nearly 30 years helping women, men and young people lead healthy lives. We believe that when people are truly cared for, they will make their lives, their families – and even the world – better and healthier. -
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 2009 MEDIA CONTACTS: Liz Eyraud, Planned Parenthood 314.531.7526 Ext
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 1, 2009 MEDIA CONTACTS: Liz Eyraud, Planned Parenthood 314.531.7526 ext. 336 [email protected] SEPTEMBER IS GYN CANCER AWARENESS MONTH Woman of all ages can count on Planned Parenthood for any well-woman needs GYN cancer affects women of all ages and walks of life. The broad classification includes five main and most common types of cancer that are associated with a woman's reproductive organs: cervical, ovarian, uterine, vaginal, and vulvar. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, women over 40 are often at higher risk for ovarian and uterine cancer, but HPV is also a leading risk factor for all females. The human papillomavirus (HPV), a common virus that can be passed from one person to another during sex, is the main cause of cervical cancer and also causes many vaginal and vulvar cancers. Additionally, it is important to keep up with yearly exams because every 6 out of 10 cervical cancers occur in women who have never received a Pap test or have not been tested in the past five years. “Planned Parenthood prides itself on serving women of all ages for their varying needs,” says Paula Gianino, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region. “We encourage women to educate themselves and to take control of their sexual health with preventative screenings.” Planned Parenthood offers gynecological exams, cancer screenings, birth control services, as well as the HPV vaccine for females from 9 to 26 years old. Learn more about prevention at www.plannedparenthood.org/stlouis, or call 1.800.230.PLAN to schedule an appointment for any well-woman needs at one of the six health centers. -
An Act Protecting Girls from Genital Mutilation Senator Harriette Chandler, Lead Senate Sponsor Representative Sarah Peake, Lead House Sponsor S788 | H2333
AN ACT PROTECTING GIRLS FROM GENITAL MUTILATION SENATOR HARRIETTE CHANDLER, LEAD SENATE SPONSOR REPRESENTATIVE SARAH PEAKE, LEAD HOUSE SPONSOR S788 | H2333 Female Genital Mutilation involves removing part or all of a girl’s healthy sex organs and surrounding tissue for non-medical reasons resulting in health consequences, death in childbirth and LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMET LOREM IPSUM DOLOR lifelong trauma. LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR The statistics available on Female Genital Mutilation in LOtheREM IPSUM US are speculationsLOREM mostlyIPSUM based on populations from FGM affected communities.LOREM IPSUMIn DO LO2000,R SIT AMET LOREM IPSUM the DOLOR African LOREMWomen’s IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMET LOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR Health Center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital estimatedLOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT thatAMETLOREM IPSUM 227,887 DOLOR womenLOREM IPSUM DO LOandR SIT AMETLO REM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR girls in the United States were at risk of FGM, includingLO REMgirls IPSUM living in Boston, LawrenceLOREM IPSUM and Worcester, Massachusetts. Over the past few years,LO asREM IPSUM victims DOLOR SIT AMET LOREM IPSUM have DOLOR begun LOtoREM IPSUM speak DOLOR SIT AMET LO REM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR out publicly, reports of transporting girls out of the countryLOREM IPSUM DO LOtoR SIT AM ETbeLOREM IPSUMcut DOLOR while vacationingLOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLO REM IPSUM DOLOR LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR ++ LOREM IPSUM DOLOR SIT AMETLOREM IPSUM DOLOR have been widely disseminated in US news. -
Griswold V. Connecticut (1965) [1]
Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) [1] By: Seward, Sheraden Keywords: Reproductive rights [2] Abortion [3] Contraception [4] US Supreme Court [5] The landmark Supreme Court case, Griswold v. Connecticut [6] (1965), gave women more control over their reproductive rights [7] while also bringing reproductive and birth control [8] issues into the public realm and more importantly, into the courts. Bringing these issues into the public eye allowed additional questions about the reproductive rights [7] of women, such as access to abortion [9], to be asked. This court case laid the groundwork for later cases such as Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) and Roe v. Wade [10] (1973). Estelle Griswold [11], the executive director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut (PPLC), and Dr. C. Lee Buxton [12], the director of Yale University’s infertility [13] clinic, were charged and convicted in 1962 of violating the 1879 Connecticut anti-contraception [14] law. This anti-contraception [14] law made it illegal for any person to use contraceptives or help another person obtain contraceptives. Any person found guilty of violating this law could be fined and/or imprisoned. The law itself was the primary issue being contested in the Griswold v. Connecticut [6] case. On 29 March 1965 the oral argument of the case began with Fowler V. Harper, Tom Emerson, and Catherine Roraback as the attorneys for Griswold and Buxton and Joseph Clark as the attorney for the state of Connecticut. Emerson argued that the right to privacy was implicit in the US Constitution in the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments.