DOCSLIB.ORG

GENDER, MEMORY and NATIONALISM MA Level Elective Class, 2 Credits (Online) Fall 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GENDER, MEMORY and NATIONALISM MA Level Elective Class, 2 Credits (Online) Fall 2020 Central European University (Vienna Campus) Department of Gender Studies GENDER, MEMORY AND NATIONALISM MA Level Elective Class, 2 Credits (Online) Fall 2020 Course Syllabus INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Instructor: Dr Hannah Loney Email: [email protected] Virtual Office Hours: Monday 9.00am–11.00am and by appointment (via Zoom) Teaching Assistant: Tegiye Birey Email: [email protected] Virtual Office Hours: By appointment (via Zoom) COURSE INFORMATION Course Description: This course examines the complex relationships between gender, memory and nationalism. It addresses the main theoretical perspectives on nations and nationalism, as well as feminist critiques of these perspectives. The course also considers the material ways in which nationalist discourses and practices are both gendered and sexualized. Paying particular attention to the politics of memory, the course approaches the concept of the nation and its variants as historically contingent, and continually reproduced through discourse and practice. Particular areas of focus include imperialism, citizenship, sexual violence, ethnicity, migration and populism. Geographically and historically, the course takes a broad and comparative view of gender, memory and nationalism across time and space. Note: This course shares many core readings and our TA with the 4-credit on-site course in Vienna, “Gender and Nationalism”, which is taught by Professor Elissa Helms. Students may participate in joint online discussions between the two classes, where available, but they can be enrolled in only one of the courses. It is not possible to switch from one course to the other after the end of the official drop/add period. Students who expect to be present in Vienna may wish to choose Professor Helms’ course instead. Learning Outcomes: Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: • identify and discuss the main theoretical perspectives on nations and nationalism, and their critiques; • recognize and analyze the ways in which notions of gender, sex and sexuality are implicated in nationalist discourses and practices; • understand the role of memory within processes of nationalism; 1 • critically assess and compare class readings according to different theoretical arguments and methods; and • present critical written analysis that is supported by arguments and evidence, and identify and research a topic relevant to the themes of the course. REQUIREMENTS & EXPECTATIONS This course will be taught entirely online. All materials will be made available via the course e-learning site (Moodle). The course will be comprised of asynchronous (not at a set time) and synchronous (at a set time) activities. Each week, students are required to watch a short online lecture (15-20 minutes) that will introduce key themes and ideas related to the weekly topic. Students are also required to participate in an online class discussion (1 hour). Following the online class discussion, students are required to submit (at least) two quality posts to the online discussion forum within one week. The online class discussion will be held on Fridays from 9.00am–10.00am (CEST until 25 October, then CET) via Zoom.* If you are concerned that you may not be able to participate in the online class in any given week – due to illness, serious unavoidable matters, religious observances, or if emergency childcare obligations arise – please contact the instructor in advance, so that alternate arrangements can be made. In these circumstances, and conditional upon the approval of the instructor, students may write a 1-page (approx. 250-word) response to the weekly topic, required readings and discussion questions. This response must be submitted via Moodle within one week of the missed class. Where appropriate, students with a disability, medical condition or carer responsibilities should contact the instructor prior to the start of term to discuss suitable adjustments to their participation or assessment. ASSESSMENT Your final grade for this course will be based on: • Online class attendance and participation: 30% • Reaction paper: 20% • Group media project: 50% Online Class Attendance and Participation (30%) There are two components to the online class attendance and participation grade: 1. Attendance and participation in online class discussions (15%) Students are expected to regularly attend, prepare for, and participate constructively in weekly online class discussions (conducted via Zoom). Students may have one unexcused absence and two excused absences, as per the above * Please note that the online class discussion may be rescheduled, or an additional class added, depending on students’ time zones (see “Preparing for Online Learning” questionnaire on Moodle). 2 guidelines. Beyond that, each unexcused absence will negatively affect your attendance and participation grade by 0.5%. In order to prepare for class discussions, students should: watch the online lecture before class; read the short summary of the weekly topic and introduction to the readings; complete the “Required Reading”; and make some notes in response to the questions posed. 2. Contribution to online discussion forums (15%) Students are also required to participate in the online discussion forms. This will involve posting one concise reflection (approx. 100 words) upon the topics and readings introduced each week. Some weeks, you will be required to post responses to set discussion questions or tasks. In general, though, you should consider: what was the most striking point that emerged from the readings and class discussions this week? How did it add to / enrich your understanding of the complex relationships between gender, memory and nationalism? In addition, you are expected to review posts by classmates and post one short, insightful and constructive response (this only needs to be a few lines in length). Both posts must be made within one week of the online class discussion. Students will receive interim feedback on their online class attendance and participation via email at the end of Week 6. Online class attendance and participation will be assessed on the following criteria: • Regular attendance and posting • Evidence of preparation • Active participation • Quality of comments and reflections • Listening skills Reaction Paper (20%) – due Friday 30 October at 11.59pm Students are required to write a reaction paper of 2–3 pages (approx. 750 words). The reaction paper should provide a coherent summary and critical analysis of one of the reading from Week 3, 4 or 5 (note: you may select from the list of “Required Reading” or the “Recommended Reading”). Your paper should provide a short summary of the key ideas discussed, but the emphasis should be on critically analysing and engaging with the arguments put forward in the text. Consider the following questions as you prepare your response: • What is the main argument contained within the text? What are the sub- arguments? • To whom is the text speaking? (who is the author and how are they situated geographically, disciplinarily, in terms of seniority; where did the publication appear, in what debates is the text intervening, whether implicitly or explicitly?) • What evidence does the author present to support the argument, and how was it gathered? • Is the argument convincing? Why or why not? 3 • How does this reading relate to other literature we have discussed within this course (or other material you have read)? To your own knowledge and experiences? Does it further our understanding of gender and nationalist processes? Reaction papers will be assessed on the following criteria: • Understanding of key ideas and concepts • Clarity and quality of summary and analysis • Critical, effective and economical use of texts • Quality of written expression and structure • Correct referencing and formatting Note: Students may not write their reaction paper on a similar topic to any responses completed in lieu of online class attendance and participation. Group Media Project (50%) Students are required to complete a group media project that aims at engaging with the key themes, theories and methods discussed within the course. In groups of 2–4 (depending on the size of the class), you are required to select one case study (a public spectacle, practice, state initiative, citizen group, media debate, or other phenomenon) that illustrates the complex relationships between gender, memory and nationalism. Your case study must be accessible visually: an illustrated newspaper or magazine article, website, YouTube video, film clip, Facebook group, blog, etc. Your case study can be from any country or setting, but it must not have been analysed in the scholarly literature (as far as you can reasonably ascertain). You are required present your analysis in two stages, as a group and individually: 1. Group Presentation (20%) – due Friday 11 December, 11.59pm You are required to present the findings of your group media project in a short online format (for example, a 15-minute video, podcast or PPT with recorded narration), to be uploaded to Moodle by Friday 11 December, 11.59pm. The presentation may include images, short clips and brief text (focus on key conclusions and arguments). It should also contain analysis; that is, it should illustrate points from and comparisons with class readings, showing how your case study challenges /expands upon any of the texts’ main arguments. All group projects should be uploaded to Moodle; you will then have the opportunity to view other projects, offer feedback
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Debora Spini Teaches at Syracuse University in Florence and at New York University in Florence
    Debora Spini teaches at Syracuse University in Florence and at New York University in Florence. She is the author of various essays and book chapters in English and Italian on topics such as the transformation of public spaces, crisis of the modern self, secularization and postsecularization. Her current research in- terests focus on the intersection between gender and religion in violent conflicts. Contact: [email protected] A CALL TO LOYALTY: WOMEN’S BODIES, PLAYGROUNDS AND BATTLEFIELDS Debora Spini Syracuse University Florence DOI: 10.17450/170206 Reception date 19th June 2017; acceptance date 19th July 2017. This article is the result of research activities held at Syracuse University Florence. Abstract The article aims at analysing how the use of “feminist” arguments by xenophobic, right –wing and populist discourses– constitutes a specific form of neutralisation of feminism. In European public discourse, women’s freedom is becoming a pawn in a political game that has nothing to do with women themselves. Women’s bodies –posses- sed, re-appropriated, impregnated, covered and uncovered– become battlefields for the “identity conflicts” of late modernity. On the other hand, the aspiration to autonomy, re-narrated in late capitalism in terms of freedom to consume, causes women bodies, exposed, spectacularised, commodified, to become the playgrounds of neo-liberal order (Fraser, 2009). Some trends in contemporary feminism reflect this mimetic version of freedom, thus contributing to make feminist critique suitable to the spirit of new capi- talism and easily manipulated by xenophobic, right-wing populist discourses. Keywords Gender, difference, xenophobia, neoliberal order. 93 Soft Power Volumen 4, número 2, julio-diciembre, 2017 Resumen Este artículo muestra cómo los argumentos feministas utilizados por discursos de derecha populistas y xenofóbicos contribuyen a la neutralización del feminismo en el discurso público europeo, la libertad de la mujer se invoca para fines que tienen poco que ver con ellas mismas.
    [Show full text]
  • The SOUTH ASIA INITIATIVE Year in Review 2011-2012 TABLE of CONTENTS
    the SOUTH ASIA INITIATIVE Year in Review 2011-2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATION KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF 2011-2012 4 FAS Faculty of Arts and Sciences GSAS Graduate School of Arts and Sciences GSD Graduate School of Design HBS Harvard Business School HDS Harvard Divinity School HGSE Harvard Graduate School of Education HKS Harvard Kennedy School of Government HLS Harvard Law School FACULTY 8 HMS Harvard Medical School HSPH Harvard School of Public Health SAI South Asia Initiative SEAS School of Engineering and Applied Sciences STUDENT 14 IN-REGION 20 COMMUNITY 23 FY12 BUDGET 24 IN THE NEWS 25 2011 Best Photo in South Asia Office of International Programs Photo Contest SAI Sponsored Prize Woman in Red Sari Sophia Angelis, 2013 Sophia participated in a SAI sponsored internship at the Bandra East Community Center in Mumbai, India during the summer of 2011. A YEAR IN REVIEW 2011-2012 | c Dear Friends, Since its inception in 2003, Harvard’s South Asia Initiative (SAI) has sought to catalyze intellectual exchange among faculty and students in different parts of Harvard, and between the University and the South Asia region. Thanks to a growing sense of community, I am happy to report several significant achievements during this past academic year. While Harvard’s engagement in South Asia goes back almost a century, Harvard has only recently broadened its intellectual reach to embrace several areas of contemporary and interdisciplinary interest, without losing sight of DIRECTOR’S REPORT the importance of culture, tradition and history. Senior faculty from across the University currently head efforts in Water, Urbanization, and Social Enterprise, for example.
    [Show full text]
  • Sara Farris and Catherine Rottenberg
    INTRODUCTION: RIGHTING FEMINISM Sara Farris and Catherine Rottenberg In the last few years, we have witnessed a perplexing new trend. Following an extended period in which few high-profile women were willing to identify publicly with feminism, all of a sudden - or so it appeared - many well-known women were loudly declaring themselves feminists, one after the other: from the former president of Barnard College, Debora Spar and the current UK Prime Minister, Theresa May, through internationally popular music celebrities Miley Cyrus and Beyoncé to right-wing populists like Marine Le Pen in France.1 Indeed, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign was strongly 1. Asked if she identifies herself as endorsed by liberal feminist organisations, and marked one of the high points a feminist, Le Pen of a resurgent feminist agenda in the United States with resonances across said that she could consider herself as the western world. Despite her ultimate defeat, Clinton was nevertheless the such to the extent first woman in US history to be nominated as a presidential candidate by a that she defends women’s rights, major national party. Feminism, it seemed, had finally become legitimate in which are threatened the popular imagination in ways that it simply never had been before. by Islam. F. Scrinzi, ‘A new French These public feminist declarations were not the only ways in which a National Front?’, revived feminist discourse began circulating, however. Rather, since 2012 forthcoming. - in both the anglophone world as well as in the west more generally - there has been a virtual explosion of feminist discussion in both popular and mainstream media: from internationally bestselling books, through widely read articles in the mainstream print media to popular television shows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Femonationalism, by Sara R. Farris Maya El Helou
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 12:21 p.m. Refuge Canada's Journal on Refugees revue canadienne sur les réfugiés In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism, by Sara R. Farris Maya El Helou Intersectional Feminist Interventions in the "Refugee Crisis" Volume 34, Number 1, 2018 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1050856ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1050856ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Centre for Refugee Studies, York University ISSN 0229-5113 (print) 1920-7336 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review El Helou, M. (2018). Review of [In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism, by Sara R. Farris]. Refuge, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.7202/1050856ar Copyright (c), 2018 Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Volume 34 Refuge Number 1 Book Reviews In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism • Sara R. Farris Durham: Duke University Press, 2017, 272 pp. n the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonation- patriarchy. She argues here that anti-immigrant right-wing alism, by sociologist Sara R.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Right-Wing Populism in the Low Countries: Ideological Variations Across Parties and Time Sarah L
    This article was downloaded by: [Harvard Library] On: 05 March 2015, At: 06:40 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Patterns of Prejudice Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpop20 Gender and right-wing populism in the Low Countries: ideological variations across parties and time Sarah L. de Lange & Liza M. Mügge Published online: 26 Feb 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Sarah L. de Lange & Liza M. Mügge (2015): Gender and right-wing populism in the Low Countries: ideological variations across parties and time, Patterns of Prejudice, DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2015.1014199 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2015.1014199 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlène Schiappa, Femonationalism and Us1
    Marlène Schiappa, Femonationalism and Us1 Kaoutar Harchi Translated by Samuel Lamontagne Barely appointed Minister Delegate to the Minister of the Interior in charge of Citizenship, Marlène Schiappa, former Secretary of State for Equality between Men and Women and the Fight against Discrimination, put on the new clothes—in fact, not so new—of the political function that she is to carry out. These new responsi- bilities don’t come without reminding us of old positions. In 2017, these so-called feminist positions advocated both the introduction of maternity leave not indexed to the professional status of mothers and the prosecution of sexist insults uttered in the public arena. The combination, then as now, of the implementation of security appa- ratuses aiming at controlling masculine conduct on the one hand, and of the rhetoric of protecting women against sexist and sexual violence on the other, is far from being a circumstantial measure. It can even be part of a carceral, punitive type of feminist project: Deployed at the heart of the state, it carries the state’s mark to the point of entrusting the monopoly of the protective management of women to the institutions of force—the police and the prisons. Only having a passion for punishment and imprisonment is both necessary and insufficient; the analysis of the alliances made cannot be done independently from an analysis of the political meanings induced symbolically, nor can it evacuate the empirical effects on the lives of men and women. For, in the end, what men and women does Marlène
    [Show full text]
  • A Festschrift for Liisa Husu on Gender, Science and Academia
    ? A Festschrift for LIISA HUSU EDITORS: Sofia Strid, Dag Balkmar, have a a have have gender gender Jeff Hearn & Louise Morley on gender, science and academia DoesDoes knowledge knowledge DOES KNOWLEDGE HAVE A GENDER? DOES KNOWLEDGE HAVE A GENDER? PHOTO Ulla-Carin Ekblom B Does knowledge have a gender? A Festschrift for Liisa Husu on gender, science and academia Edited by Sofia Strid, Dag Balkmar, Jeff Hearn and Louise Morley PREFACE It is a great pleasure for me to honour Liisa Husu on her official retirement. As the first Professor of Gender Studies at Örebro University and leader of the multidisciplinary Centre for Feminist Social Studies (CFS), I was very happy to welcome Liisa to both positions, when I retired at the end of 2009. To put it simply: I can hardly think of a better successor. When Liisa came to Örebro we were in the middle of the GEXcel project, the Gender Excellence Centre and the five-years visiting scholar programme we were running together with Linköping University. I continued as a Senior Professor to work with GEXcel and lead the Örebro part of it, now together TITLE with Liisa. From that time of intense collaborative activities and ever since Does knowledge have a gender? A Festschrift for Liisa Husu on – as I continued to be active part-time in the doctoral programme and the gender, science and academia research milieu – we have been working as colleagues in a mutually sup- COVER IMAGES portive and genuinely good spirit. Liina Aalto-Setälä GRAPHIC DESIGN Liisa’s academic career is a very successful combination of Tuomas Kortteinen research merits and femocratic work; and her Alma Mater has awarded PUBLISHED BY her prizes for excellence in both, the University of Helsinki Gender Stud- Örebro University PRINTING ies award in 2002 and the University of Helsinki Gender Equality Prize in Örebro University 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality and Beyond: at the Crossroads of Neoliberalism, Anti-Gender Movements, “European” Values, and Normative Reiterations in the Nordic Model
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2018, Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 1–7 DOI: 10.17645/si.v6i4.1799 Editorial Gender Equality and Beyond: At the Crossroads of Neoliberalism, Anti-Gender Movements, “European” Values, and Normative Reiterations in the Nordic Model Katarina Giritli Nygren 1,*, Lena Martinsson 2 and Diana Mulinari 3 1 Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 51 70 Sundsvall, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Cultural Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Gender Studies, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 25 October 2018 | Published: 22 November 2018 Abstract The social-democratic-inspired “Nordic model”, with its agenda for gender equality, has been an important example for the development of political interventions to transform society but at the same time, it has functioned as an emerging gender normalising and stabilising structure. In the last decade it has also become the focus of antigender movements and ethno-nationalistic parties both as emblematic for the Nordic nations as well as a threat that must be destroyed to save the nation. This issue will elaborate further on gender equality as a node, a floating signifier in powerful and often contradictory discourses. We are inspired by scholarships of hope in a dialogue with articles that search for realistic utopias that might be considered to be “beyond gender equality”. The included articles engage with the messiness and crossroads of gender equality in relation to the work-line, territories, neo-liberalism, religion, the crisis of solidarity and the success of anti-genderism agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing the Gender Card: Femonationalism in Norwegian Immigration and Integration Discourse
    Central European University Academic Year 2016 - 2017 Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals Academic Year 2017 - 2018 Playing the Gender Card: Femonationalism in Norwegian Immigration and Integration Discourse Thesis submitted by METTE CHRISTINE RISOM OLSEN In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ERASMUS MUNDUS MASTER IN PUBLIC POLICY CEU eTD Collection Supervisors: DR. ANDREA KRIZSÁN and DR. PABLO PAREJA ALCARAZ Author’s Declaration I hereby certify that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I hereby grant IBEI and the Mundus MAPP Consortium the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis. Mette Christine Risom Olsen Berlin, July 15, 2018 CEU eTD Collection 2 Abstract From the early 2000s onwards, Western European populist radical right parties have begun “playing the gender card” and talking of the importance of gender equality. It is puzzling that this party family, which traditionally is family conservative and sometimes even blatantly anti-feminist, has begun preaching for the emancipation of female Muslim immigrants. The most prominent explanation for why these parties employ gender equality rhetoric revolves around bordering who belongs to the nation and who does not, and establishing difference between what is represented as the gender equal majority population and the patriarchal (Muslim) immigrant population.
    [Show full text]
  • Protest, Justice, and Transnational Organizing SAN FRANCISCO, CA 2020 NWSA Chair and Director Meeting
    NWSA’S 40TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE Protest, Justice, and Transnational Organizing 2019 NWSA ANNUAL CONFERENCE: Protest, Justice, and Transnational Organizing NOV 14–17, 2019 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2018 14-17, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 2020 NWSA Chair and Director Meeting About Friday March 6th The 2020 Chair and Director meeting will be focused on the different responses Chicago, IL to external pressures experienced by departments, programs, and centers. This event is intended to promote field- building by bringing together program and department chairs and women’s center directors for a day-long meeting as an added benefit of institutional membership. Participants will exchange ideas and strategies focused on program and center administration, curriculum development, and pedagogy, among other topics. Participation requirements: • 2020 institutional membership • Chair and Director Meeting registration fee $125 • Registration form DEADLINE The fee includes participation in the event and TO REGISTER: breakfast and lunch the day of the meeting. It does not include travel. NWSA will cover one night’s FEBRUARY 15, 2020 accommodations for those who require it. 2019 NWSA ANNUAL CONFERENCE: Protest, Justice, and Transnational Organizing NOV 14–17, 2019 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Table of Contents President’s Welcome ........................................... 4 A Brief (and Incomplete) History of the NWSA Women of Color Caucus ................................... 43 Conference Maps ............................................... 5 NWSA Receptions
    [Show full text]
  • Blurring Boundaries? Re-Articulations of Feminisms and Gender Politics in the Context of Right-Wing Mobilizations in Europe 23.-25
    Blurring boundaries? Re-articulations of feminisms and gender politics in the context of right-wing mobilizations in Europe 23.-25. May 2019, University of Marburg The workshop is a joint project of the Chair for Gender and Politics/University of Marburg, the research project ‘REVERSE – Antifeminism as a threat to social integration’ at the Center for Gender Studies of the University of Marburg, and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. Annette Henninger, Juliane Lang, Katharina Pühl We are currently observing a shift in feminist and broader political debates in Europe: On the one hand, anti-feminist or anti-gender discourses, actions and campaigns target gender-study programs, gender mainstreaming, the liberalization of sexual politics and reproductive rights as well as feminist politics or LGBTI*-activism. On the other hand, some feminist positions are taken up by right-wing anti-feminists and turned into nationalist projects of in-/ exclusion – sometimes even with the support of parts of the LGBTI*-movement or by feminist actors. In this context, we observe efforts to include white gay men and white women into the construc- tion of a national ‘we’, a racialization or externalization of sexualized violence, nationalist wel- fare state policies and policies that frame equality as a nationalist, exclusive practice. Contributions deal with the question how recent right wing attacks, discourses and racist in- terventions have shaped – and altered – the agenda of politics with regard to progressive po- litical feminist positions concerning sexual and reproductive rights including abortion. Also, politics around sexual orientations and trans* identities are questioned – and considered as a deviation from a model of the ‘traditional’ heterosexual family.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluralistic Struggles in Gender, Sexuality and Coloniality
    Pluralistic Struggles in Gender, Sexuality and Coloniality Challenging Swedish Exceptionalism Edited by Erika Alm · Linda Berg Mikela Lundahl Hero · Anna Johansson Pia Laskar · Lena Martinsson Diana Mulinari · Cathrin Wasshede Pluralistic Struggles in Gender, Sexuality and Coloniality “There is a hegemonic narrative of Sweden as an exemplary and exceptional feminist nation-state, one that exists in a secular, migrant-friendly, and market-friendly, liberal democracy. Yet this narrative’s racial and religious exclusions and conflicts— of which there are many—have led feminists and LGBTQ activists to question the terms of normative belonging, and to probe the tensions and frictions of contemporary Sweden. This necessary and powerful collection of essays reveals both the exclusions of this exceptionalist national narrative, one that the editors and authors trenchantly term “neocolonial,” and the demands of feminist, queer and trans artists, researchers, migrants, and activists striving to produce lives that think a different Sweden: of communities that are plural, transnational, multi-racial, transformative, radical and ever-changing. —Inderpal Grewal Professor Emerita, Yale University Erika Alm • Linda Berg Mikela Lundahl Hero Anna Johansson • Pia Laskar Lena Martinsson Diana Mulinari • Cathrin Wasshede Editors Pluralistic Struggles in Gender, Sexuality and Coloniality Challenging Swedish Exceptionalism Editors Erika Alm Linda Berg Department of Cultural Sciences Umeå Centre for Gender Studies University of Gothenburg Umeå University Gothenburg,
    [Show full text]