Statement of Consultation and Representations Community Infrastructure Levy: Draft Charging Schedule

June 2015

1. Introduction

1.1 Consultation on the RBBC Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Draft Charging Schedule was undertaken between 13 April 2015 and 26 May 2015. This statement provides a summary of the consultation process and the representations received.

1.2 The statement is prepared in accordance with Regulation 19 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations (as amended). It specifically covers:  Which bodies and persons the Council invited to make representations during the preparation of the Core Strategy  How those bodies and persons were invited to make representations  How the consultation was otherwise publicised and made available  The number of representations made  A summary of main issues raised in the representations

Process and consultation to date

1.3 In order for CIL to be adopted, it is required by the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) that the Council carries out a minimum of two rounds of public consultation, firstly on a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and subsequently on a Draft Charging Schedule. Regulations 15 and 16 of the regulations specify the consultation bodies that the Council must consult.

1.4 The Council first consulted on a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule between 14 September 2012 and 26 October 2012. However, after this consultation, the Council placed progressing CIL on hold until its Core Strategy had been adopted.

1.5 The Core Strategy was adopted in July 2014. In light of the passage of time since the first consultation in September-October 2012 and interim changes to the CIL Regulations and national and local policies, the Council chose to consult again on a new Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule. This provided stakeholders and consultees with another opportunity to comment on the Council’s revised proposals.

1.6 Consultation on the revised Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule was carried out in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 15 and ran from 28 November 2014 to 12 January 2015. A total of 35 responses were received, a summary of which is set out in the CIL Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Consultation Statement (March 2015). These responses informed updates to the Council’s evidence base and the preparation of the Draft Charging Schedule.

1.7 The Council has consulted beyond the minimum statutory requirement to ensure that a wider range of consultation bodies were given the opportunity to make representations.

2

2. Consultation on the Draft Charging Schedule

Scope of consultation

2.1 The purpose of consultation on the Draft Charging Schedule was to allow developers, landowners, businesses, local communities, infrastructure providers and other interest groups to make representations on the proposed charges and the evidence of infrastructure needs and economic viability which the Council used to inform the charge setting process.

2.2 In accordance with Regulation 16, respondents to the consultation were also invited to request notification of future steps in the preparation, examination and adoption of the charging schedule as well as the right to be heard by the examiner.

2.3 The following documents were made available as part of the consultation:  Draft Charging Schedule (March 2015)  CIL Explanatory Document (April 2015)  Draft list of relevant infrastructure (March 2015)  Draft position statement on the use of CIL and other developer contributions (March 2015)  CIL Revised Viability Assessment – Main Report & Appendices (March 2015)  Infrastructure Delivery Plan Addendum (March 2015)  Background evidence on section 106 and affordable housing (October 2014)

2.4 A Statement of Availability and Representations Procedure were also published in accordance with Regulation 16 and a standard consultation response form was made available to assist those making representations.

Consultation methods

2.5 Consultation on the Draft Charging Schedule was held between 13 April 2015 and 26 May 2015, extending to just over 6 weeks.

2.6 The Council has complied with Regulation 16 of the CIL Regulations in terms of the requirements for consultation on the DCS. All of the specific consultation bodies in Regulation 15 were notified of the consultation and invited to make representations. In addition, the Council notified, and invited representations from other interested parties including residents, those carrying on business in the (and bodies representing their interests), and relevant voluntary bodies.

2.7 The following methods of consultation were used:

2.7.1 Postal/email notification: Direct notification of the consultation, including details to access the Draft Charging Schedule and supporting material was sent, by post or email, to all interested parties on the Council’s consultation database, some 1,542 individuals and organisations. This includes all of the statutory consultation bodies set out in the Regulations and a broad spectrum of other stakeholder including residents, residents groups, businesses, landowners and developers (see Annex 3). 3

2.7.2 Local press advertisement: In accordance with the Regulations, a public notice advertising the consultation and containing details of document availability and the representations procedure was published in the 16 April 2015 edition of the Mirror (see Annex 4). The notice was also made available on the on-line notices section of the Surrey Mirror website. 2.7.3 Borough e-news: The consultation was highlighted in the May 2015 edition of the Council’s Borough E-newsletter (see Annex 4) which was sent electronically to local residents on the Council’s database and published on the Council’s website1. 2.7.4 Website: Detailed information about the consultation, including access to all relevant documents and details of how to respond were made available on the Council’s dedicated CIL webpages (see Annex 4)

2.8 In order to assist those making representations, a Statement of Representations Procedure and Availability was published in accordance with the Regulations (see Annex 4). The Council also prepared an Explanatory Document summarising the key points of the consultation and the evidence supporting the charging approach, and a consultation response form.

2.9 Hard copies of the consultation material were made available at the Council’s Main Offices and were available on request to interested parties.

Consultation responses

2.10 A total of 24 responses2 were received to the Draft Charging Schedule. The profile of respondents was as follows. A full list of respondents is set out at Annex 1.

Type of respondent Number Developer/landowner (or representative of) 6 Retail operator (or representative of) 1 Town/Parish Council 2 Public body/infrastructure provider (or representative of) 6 Neighbouring local authority 3 Resident/residents group 2 Other body/organisation 3

2.11 A number of the representations make no comment on the Draft Charging Schedule or supporting evidence, whilst several others offer only general suggestions in respect of the supporting documentation, particularly in respect of the types of infrastructure which CIL should be used to support.

2.12 A summary of the key issues raised in each of the representations and a brief response from the Council (including factual clarifications), is set out in Annex 2.

1 http://www.reigate-banstead.gov.uk/news/2015/may/mayissueofboroughenews.asp 2 In two cases, single responses were received from agents on behalf of several clients 4

2.13 Various respondents requested to be notified at future stages of the CIL preparation process. Additionally, four respondents - all of which represent residential developers or those with land interests in the borough - requested the right to be heard by the examiner. Responses to these questions are summarised in Annex 1.

5

ANNEX 1 List of Respondents, Requests to be Heard and Notified

Respondent Respondent No Request to be heard Request to be notified3 Borough Council 001 Ltd (Aerodrome Safeguarding) 002 Fisher German representing Government Pipelines and Storage Systems 003 Natural 004 Woking Borough Council 005 a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes Nutfield Conservation Society 006 No a) No; b) Yes; c) Yes Runnymede Borough Council 007 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes The Society 008 Emmerton Developments 009 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes & Parish Council 010 Highways England 011 Planning Potential representing ALDI Stores Ltd 012 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes Environment Agency 013 No Savills representing Thames Water 014 Planning Issues representing Churchill Retirement Living 015 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes 016 White & Sons 017 Yes a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes Town Council 018 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes WS Planning & Architecture representing various clients 019 Yes a) No; b) No; c) No Quod representing Berkeley Strategic 020 Yes a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes National Farmers Union 021 Savills representing Housebuilder Consortium comprising Crest Nicholson, Miller Homes, 022 Yes a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and Thakeham Homes Sport England 023 No a) No; b) No; c) Yes Council 024 No a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes

3 The various notification stages are as follows a) submission of charging schedule, b) publication of examiners recommendations, c) approval of the charging schedule 6

ANNEX 2 Summary of Issues Raised and Response

ID Respondent Summary of Key Issues Raised Council Response Surrey Heath Borough No comments Noted 001 Council Gatwick Airport Ltd – No comments Noted 002 Aerodrome Safeguarding Fisher German for Map of clients apparatus submitted Noted 003 Government Pipelines and Storage Systems No specific comments on draft CIL charges Noted

004 Natural England Requests that the Council gives consideration to the role of CIL in the The Council’s Infrastructure Delivery Plan and draft creation, protection, enhancement and management of networks of infrastructure list both make reference to CIL in the delivery of biodiversity and green infrastructure green infrastructure 005 Woking Borough Council No comments Noted Nutfield Conservation No comments Noted 006 Society Queries whether the 2012 IDP was available during the consultation The IDP was available throughout the consultation on the Council’s Planning Policy Evidence and Research webpages and the IDP 2015 Addendum was available on the CIL webpage.

Runnymede Borough 007 Seeks clarification of the purpose of exclusions on the draft list of Noted – in accordance with Reg 123, the list shows those Council relevant infrastructure. projects or types of infrastructure which the Council intends may be wholly or partly funded by CIL. Exclusions highlight any specific projects within a broad category which the Council would not intend to be funded by CIL and therefore which may still be secured through other means. Highlights need to protect the extent of Green Belt Noted

Suggests that population growth will add to the daily traffic flow Noted – The Council’s Infrastructure Delivery Plan includes a 008 The Reigate Society through the borough and raises concerns about the adequacy of the number of transport and highways projects to address the network to accommodate impacts of growth

7

Welcomes measures to improve pedestrian and cycle safety and Support and suggestions noted suggests a number of transport projects for consideration The Zone 2 charge will reduce the value of sites and stop new homes The Zone 2 residential charge is informed by the viability being built. Considers it unnecessary to set a substantial charge if no evidence and is set below the maximum viable level which reliance is being placed on housing supply in these locations. There could be supported by schemes in these locations. The will be injustice at the boundaries of different zones. proposed charge strikes an appropriate balance between the need for funding to deliver infrastructure and the implications for viability of development in these locations. It also reflects the principle that the economic impact of CIL should be fair and proportionate across the borough.

Build costs quoted are not achievable – actual figures from recent The assumptions in the Council’s Revised Viability development cited. No allowance is made for garages. Questions the Assessment (VA) are considered to be robust, drawn from finance costs, build periods and density assumptions in the recognised sources and appropriate available local evidence or appraisals. based on industry standard approaches.

In particular, the build cost assumptions adopted in the VA are drawn from BCIS – an industry recognised source – and are appropriate. The Council also notes that the top end of build 009 Emmerton Developments costs quoted by respondent in the representation based on their exemplar scheme (£1,538/sqm – which is stated to includes external works, planning and professional fees and costs of building garages) is in fact less than the Council's equivalent assumptions. For example, on the Council's 3 unit appraisal, once externals works, professional and planning costs are taken into account the basic build cost of £1,300/sqm rises to £1,580/sqm.

Density assumptions are drawn from analysis of local schemes as set out in Table 2 of the VA and are considered to be realistic.

Sensitivity testing should model price drops seen during the The purpose of sensitivity testing and the buffer included within recession the levy rates is to ensure that the charges would not become unviable as a result of normal market changes: it is not considered to be pragmatic or reasonable to cover all possible market movements, particularly the fundamental changes seen

8

during the recession. If these were repeated, there are mechanisms for the Council to review CIL.

Draft charging schedule maps too small in scale The maps comply with the regulatory requirements set out in Regulation 12(2)(c) of the CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended). However, views are noted and the Council will ensure that future maps can be interrogated with certainty. Salfords and Sidlow No comments Noted 010 Parish Council 011 Highways England No comments Noted Charge rate for convenience retail may impact upon the viability of The charge rate for convenience retail is informed by the prospective development in the borough viability evidence and is set a significant margin below the maximum viable level which could be supported by a range of schemes.

Retail development types modelled do not reflect the formats of The type and scale of convenience schemes tested in the VA limited assortment discounters such as ALDI. Requests that further are considered appropriate. The schemes chosen reflect the viability testing should be undertaken in respect of LAD formats and advice in the Council’s retail study that additional units should Planning Potential for suggests introduction of a 1,000sqm threshold. primarily be in superstore format in order to relieve overtrading, 012 ALDI Stores Ltd supported by smaller stores meeting a localised need. They therefore test those types of convenience retail development which are most likely to come forward in the borough and most important to delivery of the Core Strategy as a whole.

Other non-LAD operators also operate store formats below 1,000sqm. There is no justification in viability terms for such a size threshold and no other lawful basis or need to set a CIL charge based on a single operators business model. Welcomes inclusion of flood risk management and corridor Support noted 013 Environment Agency enhancement on draft infrastructure list. Welcomes coverage of flood risk and green infrastructure in IDP. Considers that water a wastewater infrastructure should be exempt Support noted 014 Savills for Thames Water from CIL and as such supports nil charge for “all other development” Considers retirement housing to be critical to overall delivery of Core Specialist retirement housing represents only one option for Planning Issues for Strategy. VA has not treated retirement housing seriously. meeting the housing needs of older residents. Indeed, 015 Churchill Retirement research by Demos (2013) confirms that the majority older Living households prefer to downsize to another home than 9

purchasing specialist property. As such, whilst the Council notes the role of retirement housing, it is not considered to be critical to delivery of the Core Strategy nor is it the only solution in terms of meeting the specific needs of older households. The extent of testing undertaken in the VA is therefore considered to be proportionate and realistic.

Size of units has been overestimated. Marketing and sales costs The size assumptions for units are drawn from analysis of have been underestimated and the sales rate has been actual proposals in Reigate & or schemes in overestimated. Inclusion of empty property costs is welcomed. surrounding Surrey districts. They are therefore considered to be realistic. The sales rate assumption of 1.5 units per month is significant reduced compared to conventional housing and is considered to be realistic given the market conditions. Support for inclusion of empty property costs noted.

Highlights specific challenge and costs associated with development Noted – an allowance is made within the appraisals for sites for retirement housing contingency. It would be expected that any significant abnormal costs would be reflected in the price paid for the site. Requests clarification of wording in respect of funding for education Noted – the Council will ensure that appropriate clarifications 016 Surrey County Council provision in the draft position statement on CIL and other developer are included when the statement is incorporated into a revised contributions SPD. Supports the introduction of additional charging zones Support noted

Conversion of rural buildings may be unviable at proposed £200 per Notwithstanding the changes to permitted development, the sqm charge conversion of rural buildings is not considered to be fundamental to delivery of the Core Strategy. It would be disproportionate to introduce a separate rate for such development. It should also be borne in mind that CIL will only 017 White & Sons apply to net additional floorspace and therefore in most cases will not affect conversions.

Agrees that charge for urban extensions could be higher than urban Agreement noted. The VA adopts a residential sales value developments but suggests lower value areas (/Horley) which is considered to reflect the values which could be should be subject to same charge as NW Sector achieved on urban extensions in Merstham and Horley: the Council is therefore satisfied that these locations would be viable at the £200/sqm charge proposed. 018 Horley Town Council Supports the proposed charging schedule Support noted 10

Zone 2 charge is excessive given the amount of new housing The Zone 2 residential charge is informed by the viability expected in these locations evidence and is set below the maximum viable level which could be supported by schemes in these locations. The proposed charge strikes an appropriate balance between the need for funding to deliver infrastructure and the implications for viability of development in these locations. It also reflects the principle that the economic impact of CIL should be fair and proportionate across the borough. For clarification, the Zone 2 charge is £140/sqm not £180/sqm as quoted in the representation.

Challenges the build costs, finance costs, build period assumptions in The assumptions in the VA are considered to be robust, drawn the appraisals. from recognised sources and appropriate available local evidence or based on industry standard approaches.

WS Planning & Draft charging schedule maps too small in scale Map complies with the regulatory requirements set out in 019 Architecture for various Regulation 12(2)(c) of the CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended). clients However, views are noted and the Council will ensure that future maps can be interrogated with certainty.

Concerned about deliverability of transport projects included within Highway projects in the IDP are drawn from the County the IDP. Concerned about double dipping for education and transport Council’s Local Transport Plan Forward Programme and are projects identified in order to achieve the objectives of the LTP and mitigate the impact of future growth. The fact that schemes may not be deliverable without CIL serves to strengthen the justification for introducing a levy in the borough. The published draft position statement on the use of CIL and other developer contributions clearly sets out the circumstances in which site specific contributions for transport and education may be sought. These are limited to addressing site specific issues: this is consistent with the provisions of the Regulations and Planning Practice Guidance would not result in ‘double dipping’. Concerned that infrastructure needs and viability of proposed urban The urban extensions will be much smaller in scale than the Quod for Berkeley extensions is not properly assessed. S106 obligations for urban NW Sector and infrastructure requirements will not be 020 Strategic extensions understated, including when compared to the NW Sector comparable, particularly in terms of highways infrastructure and the figures in the Council’s background document on section 106 (e.g. new link roads) and public transport (e.g. new dedicated

11

contributions. bus routes). As compared to the £14,300 per plot allowance for the NW Sector, a £10,000 allowance for urban extensions is therefore considered to be realistic and appropriate to their scale and in light of the approach set out in the draft position statement for the use of s106. The externals and opening up costs used in the VAs for urban extensions equate to approximately £24,000 per plot and are therefore above the envelope suggested in the Harman Guidance. For clarification, the Council no longer applies the PIC tariff levels quoted (£14,777) and would not expect to achieve these contributions alongside CIL as these are not site specific but “generic infrastructure pots” which have been superseded by the CIL Regulations.

The Council needs to apply a higher s106 requirement for urban The Council’s approach to the potential application of section extensions and reduce the proposed rate or should revise draft 106 requirements on large sites is clearly set out in the draft infrastructure list and position statement to confirm CIL will be used to position statement. The level of section 106 obligations allowed address cumulative impacts of urban extensions. for in the appraisals is consistent with this. The fact that most agricultural development will be nil rated through Support noted the DCS is acknowledged and welcomed.

021 National Farmers Union Considers the £200/sqm charge to be punitive for agricultural workers Whilst such developments may be made unviable, they are not accommodation and suggests exemption. critical to plan delivery: a separate charge or exemption would therefore be disproportionate. Self-build reliefs would be available for such development in most cases. Considers many of the Council’s inputs to be reasonable but The assumptions in the VA are considered to be robust, drawn identifies a number of areas of disagreement with the Council’s from recognised sources and appropriate available local assumptions, most notably in relation to build costs, abnormals, evidence or based on industry standard approaches. Savills for Housebuilder s106/s278 contributions, developers profit, construction periods and Consortium comprising marketing/legal costs. For clarification, the Council’s build cost data is drawn from Crest Nicholson, Miller BCIS and has a rebase date of January 2015. This was the 022 Homes, Taylor Wimpey, most recent available evidence at the time the appraisals were Thakeham Homes and conducted. Whilst it is suggested in the representation that this Persimmon variable alone should be updated, this would not be appropriate without updating other variables, such as sales values, which indices show have also continued to increase.

12

To clarify other points raised in the representations: a) the allowances for s106 made in the VAs cover both s106 and s278 obligations b) the marketing allowance for strategic greenfield sites is 0.75% of sales revenue on private units and not the £1,000 per unit adopted for urban sites. This does not differ greatly from the 1% suggested in the representation.

No testing has been carried out for a 500 or 700 unit typology As set out in paragraph 2.20 of the VA, the Council’s evidence of land availability (SHLAA) demonstrates that the urban extensions are likely to be delivered across a number of separate sites in the order of 100-300 units. Testing of sites of 500 or 700 units is therefore unnecessary and unrealistic.

Based on own alternative viability appraisals, suggests that a rate of Noted – however, the Council observes that the combined £50/sqm is applied to urban extensions and £0/sqm is applied to the value of CIL and section 106 contributions which the NW Sector. Recommends adopting a lower rate of CIL for respondents appraisal suggests is viable on the NW Sector developments over 200 units. totals only £21,600,000 which is significantly below the total value of the section 106 agreement which the consortium signed in November 2014 (which totals approximately £39,000,000). This suggests that the respondent’s appraisal and assumptions dramatically understate the true viability of the development. The Council does not consider there to be any viability justification for varying the charge by number of units in the way suggested.. Supports references to indoor and outdoor sports provision on the Support noted 023 Sport England draft infrastructure list 024 Tandridge DC No comments Noted

13

ANNEX 3 List of Consultees

Regulation 15 consultation bodies

Borough Council  Salfords & Sidlow Parish Council  & Ewell Borough Council  Surrey County Council  Horley Town Council  Tandridge District Council  Borough of Croydon  District Council

Other Consultees (Businesses, Organisations, Residents Groups, National Bodies, Developers, Agents)

 5S Consulting  Batts Hill Community Association  ADS  BCF Residents' Association  Advisory Team for Large Applications (ATLAS)  Beacon Close Residents Association  Age Concern Banstead  Beaufort Road Residents' Association  Age Concern Merstham, Redhill and Reigate  Beech Drive and Bears Den Frontages Association  Age UK  Beech Road and Underhill Park Road Frontagers'  All Plans Association (BUFA)  Belfry Shopping Centre  Alliance Environment & Planning Ltd  Alliance Planning  Bell Cornwell  Alma Area Residents Association  Belmont and South Cheam Residents' Association  AMEC  Berkeley Group  Amicus Horizon  Berkeley Homes  Berkeley Homes (Southern) Ltd  Anchor Staying Put Reigate  Berkeley Strategic  Ancient Monuments Society  Architectural Designs  Betchworth Parish Council  Architecture & Planning Committee, The Reigate  Bidwells Society  Blackborough Club, Rethink (formerly National  Company Schizophrenia Fellowship)  Area Head of Children's Services Surrey County  Blanford Road Residents Association Council  Bletchingley Parish Council  Arriva Surrey &  Blue Cedar Homes  Asda Superstore ()  Blue Sky Planning  Ashill Developments  BNP Paribas  Asian Society of Redhill and Reigate  Borough of Reigate 41 Club  Asprey Estates Ltd  Borough of Arts Council  Association of Train Operating Companies  Bovis Homes Ltd  BAA - Head of Sustainability  Boyer Planning  Backwater  Boyer Planning (on behalf of Linden Homes)  Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering Ltd  BPA Limited  Banner Homes Southern Ltd  BPTW Partnership  Banstead & District Federation of Residents'  BRE Associations  Brewer Jewel Architects  Banstead Association for Community Support (BACS)  Brian Madge Ltd  Banstead Athletic Football Club  British Chemical Distributors and Traders Association  Banstead CAB  British Geological Survey  Banstead Common Conservators  British Horse Society  Banstead District Federation of RAs  British Waterways, canal owners and navigation  Banstead Leisure Project for PCD authorities  Banstead Village Residents Association  Brokes Road Limited  Banstead Wood Residents Association  Brokes Road Residents Association  Barratt Homes  Brownlow Shrewsbury and Ranelagh Roads  Barratt Southern Counties Residents' Association  Barton Willmore  BTW Shiells  Barton Wilmore (on behalf of Retirement Villages Ltd)  Buckland Parish Council  Barton Wilmore LLP (on behalf of Waitrose Ltd)  Building Design and Surveying Consultancy  Batcheller Monkhouse  Building Plan Design  Burgh Heath RA 14

 Burgh Heath RA  Design & Project Planning Services Ltd  Burstow Parish Council  Dev Plan  CABE/Deisgn Council  Development Planning Partnership  Cadia, Business Association  Devine Homes PLC  Cala Homes (South) Ltd  Devon Crescent Residents' Association,  Campaign for Real Ale Limited  DfT Rail  Campaign to Protect Rural England  DHA Planning  Care and Lifestyle Villages Ltd  Dialogue  Castle Drive Residents' Association  Diocesan Surveyor Diocese of Southwark  CB Richard Ellis  Diocese of Arundel and Brighton  CB Richard Ellis (on behalf of Hermes Property Unit  Diocese of - Property Manager Trust)  Disability Rights Commission  CgMs  Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee  Chaldon Parish Council  DLA Town Planning Ltd  Chameleon Design & Development  DMH Stallard  Chandler Planning  Dominic Lawson Bespoke Planning  Charisma Spatial Planning  Doods Park Road Residents' Association  Charlwood Parish Council  Doods Road (inc. Wilmots Close) Residents'  Chase and Partners Association  Chelmvale Ltd  Doran Gardens Residents' Association,  Chestnut Planning Ltd.  Downlands Countryside Management Project  Chipstead Residents' Association  DPDS Consulting Group  Chipstead Village Preservation Society  DPP Ltd for Belfry Unit Trust  Church Commissioners for England  Drivers Jonas  Church Hill Residents' Association  Drivers Jonas Deloitte (on behalf of Universities  Churches Together in Surrey Superannuation Scheme)  Churchill Retirement Living  DTZ (on behalf of Royal Mail)  Civil Aviation Authority  DTZ (on behalf of Wharf Land Investment)  Coast 2 Capital LEP  E G B Helicopters  E. S. O. S.  Colliers International for Legal and General  Collingwood Batchelor Ltd - Managing Director  East Ward Residents' Committee  Colman Institute  East Elmbridge and Mid-Surrey Locality, Surrey Primary Care Trust  Compass Travel  East Redhill Residents' Association  Confederation of British Industry  East Surrey CCG  Conifer Close Management   Contact The Elderly (Reigate Group)  East Surrey Rural Transport Partnership  Council for British Archaeology  East Surrey Victim Support  Country land & Business Association  County Council  Court Hill Residents' Association  Elmbridge Borough Council  Court Lodge Residents' Association  Elmswell Ltd  Court Lodge Residents' Association  Embroiderers' Guild, East Surrey Branch  Courtley Consultants Ltd  Emerson Homes  CPRE Surrey  Emmerton Developments Ltd  CPRE Surrey  Employment Law Consultancy Services  Crawley & District Bridleways Group  Energy Centre for Sustainable Communities  Crawley Borough Council  English Golf Union  MP  English Heritage  Crown Estate  Environment Agency  Cruisers  Epsom & Ewell Borough Council  Cushman and Wakefield  Equality & Human Rights  D S Design  Federation of Small Business  Dalton Warner David LLP  Fenton Road Residents' Association  DC Planning Ltd  Fields in Trust  Dean House  Fieldwood Products  Department for Business, Innovation and Skills  First Great Western Link  Department for Education  Firstplan  Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)  Firstplan (on behalf of Day Group)  Firstplan (on behalf of Esso)  Department for Justice  Department for Transport  Fisher German  Department for Work and Pensions  Framptons  Derek Horne & Associates Ltd  Friends of the Earth (Head Office)

15

 Friends, Familes and Travellers  Horley Lions Club  Friends, Families and Travellers  Horley Methodist Church  Fulcrum Design  Horley Town Council  Fusion Online Ltd  Council  Galaxy Ltd  Housing 21  Gallagher Estates  Howard Sharp and Partners (on behalf of Creative  Gallagher Estates Land Ltd)  HSBC as trustee of Hermes Property Unit Trust  Garden History Society  Gatwick Airport (Safeguarding)  Hughes McMichael  Gatwick Airport Ltd  Humphreys Planning  Hutchinson 3G UK Limited - Regional Planning and  Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign Environmental Controller  Gatwick Diamond  HW Planning  Gatwick Diamond Initiative  Hyde Group  Gatwick Green Consortium  Iceni Projects Limited  Gatwick Greenspace Partnership  Indigo Planning  Gatwick Parking Association  Inland Plc  Geoffrey Sloane Associates  Inner Wheel Club of Banstead  George Wimpey (West London Ltd)  Inner Wheel Club of Redhill  Girlguiding Division Commissioner for Merstham, Horley, Redhill and Reigate,  Inspirevolve Limited  GKA  Institute of Directors  GL Hearn  Jennifer Lampert Associates Ltd  Gladman Developments  JNA Architects  Gleeson Developments Ltd  John Lewis Head Office - Senior Property Manager  Gleeson Homes  Jones Day  Jones Lang Lasalle  Goddard Planning Consultancy  Government Pipeline & Storage System (GPSS)  Judith Norris Limited  Grainger Planning Associates  JW Design Services  Guildford Borough Council  Kareem, Anne-Marie and Ramez Khouri  Guinness Trust  Keep Redhill Airfield Green  Gypsy and Traveller Law Reform Project  Kennedys  Kingswood Residents Association  Gypsy Council  H2Property  Kingswood Village Community Association  Hallam Land Management Ltd  Kinnersley Manor Residents' Association  Hammond Phillips  Knight Frank  Hardwicke and Worcester Road Residents'  L&Q Housing Trust Association  Ladbroke Road Residents' Association  Harlequin User Group  Laing Homes  Harris Lamb (on behalf of Evonik Degussa UK  Lakers LLP Holdings Limited)  Lambert Smith Hampton  Hartswood District Residents' Association  Lambert Smith Hampton (on behalf of National  Headley Parish Council Offender Management Service inc HM Prison Service)  Heads Together  Lancaster Court Residents Association  Health and Safety Executive  Land & Partners  Heathcote Medical Centre  Lands Improvement Holdings Plc (on behalf of  Highways Agency Landmatch)  Lawn Tennis Association - Facility Development  Highways Agency - Network Operations (South East) Manager  Historic England (South East)  Learning and Skills Council  HLM Architects  Legal & General Property Ltd  Holiday Extras Limited  Leigh Parish Council  Hollybrook Homes  Leigh Residents Association  Holmesdale Road Residents' Association  Leith Planning  Holmethorpe Estate Association  Lennon Planning Limited  Home Builders Federation  Levvel  Home Counties Design  Lexis Nexis  Home Office  Limes Avenue Residents Association  Homes and Communities Agency  Linden Homes  Hookwood Residents Association  Linden Homes SE  Hope UK  Linkfield Street Residents' Association  Horley Access Group  Little Gatton Residents' Association  Horley CAB  London and Quadrant Housing  Horley Chamber Of Commerce  London Borough of Croydon

16

 London Borough of Sutton  Parish Council  London General  NFU South East Region - Environment & Land Use  London Green Belt Council Adviser  London Road North Merstham Residents Association  NHS South East Coast  Lonesome Lane Residents' Group  NHS South of England  Love Redhill  NHS Surrey  Lovelands Residents' Association  Night Stop in Reigate & Redhill  Residents' Association  Nork Community Association  LPR Design  Nork Residents Association  Norwood Hill Residents  Lyons & Sleeman & Hoare Architects  Maddox Associates  Norwood Hill Residents' Association  Maddox Associates (for Solum Regeneration)  NSPCC  Malcolm Judd & Partners  NTL Group Limited  Matthews and Son  NTR Planning  Maxam Property (Hillsbrow) Ltd  Nursery Road Residents' Association  Mayor of London  Nutfield Conservation Society  McCarthy and Stone  Nutfield Parish Council  McCarthy and Stone - The Planning Bureau  Nuthatch Garden Residents  Mencap Leisure Development Project in Surrey  O2 Telefonica  Oakwood Tree Consultants Ltd  Mental Health Services  Merland Rise Church  Objective  Open Space Society  Merland Rise Community Primary School  Merrick House Residents' Association  Opera Club of Regiate & Redhill  Merrywood Park Residents' Association  Orange  Merstham Residents' Association  Orbit Housing Group  Metrobus  Outwood Lane Residents' Association  Metropolis pd  Oxted & Limpsfield Residents Group  Pan-Age Ltd  Metropolitan Police Authority  Michael Cox Associates  Park 25 Residents Association  Michael Jordan Associates  Park Lane (Reigate) Residents' Association  Park Lane Residents Association  Mid Surrey Mencap  Park Road Residents' Association  Council  Parker Dann  Milestone Trust  Miller Strategic Land  Parkgate Road Residents Association  Millway Residents' Association  Paul & Company  Ministry of Defence  Paul Dickenson & Associates (on behalf of Millgate Homes)  Mitchells of Horley Ltd  Paul Sharpe Associates LLP (on behalf of RNIB)  Mobile Operators Association  PC Dalton Planning  Mole Valley District Council  Peacock and Smith  Monk's Walk Residents' Association  Peacock and Smith (on behalf of WM Morrisons)  Montagu Evans  Peer Group Plc  Montagu Land Limited  Pegasus Retirement Homes  Mount Green Housing Association  Persimmon Homes South East  Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners  Philip Woodhams for Messrs Caplin and Dixon  Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (on behalf of Aviva)  Phillips Planning (on behalf of Cooper Estates  Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (on behalf of Tesco Limited) Stores)  Phillips Planning (on behalf of Cooper Estates)  National Farmers Union Redhill Branch  Phillips Planning Services Ltd  National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups  Pitwood Green Residents' Association  National Grid  Planning Inspectorate  National Health Service Commissioning Board  Planning Perspectives  National Housing Federation - South East  Planning Potential Ltd  National Playing Fields Association  Planning Practice  National Trust  Planning View  National Trust – London & South East  Planspeople  Natural England  Planware Ltd  Netherne on the Hill RA  Portland & Purbeck Seniors Residents' Association  Network Rail  PPML Consulting  Network Rail Infrastructure  President, Rotary Club of Banstead  Network Rail Town Planning  Preston Hawe Residents' Association  New Merstham Residents' Association  Priory Drive & Park Lane East Residents' Association

17

 Priory Drive and Park Lane East Residents'  RICS Association  Ringley Park Road Residents' Association  Probus Club of Banstead  Preservation Society  Property Investment Holdings Ltd  Road Haulage Association  Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (PACL), The Crown Estate and Wilky Property Holdings Ltd  Road Runners Gatwick Ltd  Prupim  Robinson Escott Planning  Quality Line (Epsom Buses)  Rockshaw Road Residents' Association  Quintain Estates and Development  Rotary Club of Horley  Quod (on behalf of Berkeley Strategic)  Rotary Club of Redhill  Raglan Housing Association Ltd  Rotary Club of Reigate  Royal Earlswood Park (Barratts New Build Only)  Raglan Road Residents' Association Residents' Association  Rail Freight Group  RPS Planning and Development  Ramblers Association  RSPB East Surrey  Ramblers Association (Banstead)  Rymack Ltd  Ramblers Association (Surrey)  Salfords & Sidlow Parish Council  Rapleys LLP  Salvation Army (Redhill)  Raven Housing Trust  Samaritans of East Surrey  Raven Housing Trust - Youth Inclusion Coordination  Samway Designs Officer  Rayners Commercial  Savills  RDB Drawing Services  Savills (on behalf of Housebuilder Consortium)  Savills (on behalf of Miller Strategic)  RDjW Architects  Redehelde Residents Association  Savills (on behalf of Thames Water)  Redhelde Residents Association  Savills Research & Consultancy – UK Development  Redhill & Horley Lee Street Gospel Trust  SCC Public Health  Redhill & Reigate Greenpeace  Scott Brownrigg  Secretary to the Reigate Society  Ltd  Redhill Committee Reigate Society  Shanly Homes  Redhill Council of Churches  Shawley Community Primary School  Redhill Islamic Centre Trust  Shopkeepers Association  Redhill Little Common Residents' Association  Shopmobility Redhill  Redhill Rotary Club  Showmen's Guild of Great Britain  Sixmile Developments  Redhill Shopmobility  Redhill Sinfonia  Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings  Somers Road Conservation Area & Residents'  Redhill Young Business Club Association  Reigate & Banstead CAB  Soroptimist International (Reigate and District)  Reigate & Banstead Council for Voluntary Service  South East Coast Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust (CVS)  South East Coast Ambulance Service - Ops Support  Reigate & Banstead District Sports Council Manager (West)  Reigate & Banstead Friends of the Earth  Forestry Commission  Reigate & Banstead Pedestrian's Forum  South East Planning Aid  Reigate & Banstead Taxi Association  South Eastern Trains  Reigate & District Masonic Hall  South London Partnership  Reigate & Redhill Allotments and Gardens Association  Southern Housing Group  Reigate & Redhill YMCA - Housing Manager  Southern Planning  Reigate and Banstead Cycle Forum  Southern Planning Practice  Reigate and Banstead District CAB  Southern Railway  Reigate and Banstead Women's Aid  Sport England - South East  Reigate and Redhill Live at Home Scheme  SR Design and Build  Reigate Business Guild  SSA Planning Ltd   St Paul Travelers Limited - Facilities Manager  Reigate Lawn Tennis Club  St. Albans Road Residents' Association   St.Wilfrid's Horley  Reigate Sea Cadets  Station Inspector  Reigate Society  Stevens Drake  Reigate Society - Transport / Logistics Sub-Committee  Strategic Land Bovis Homes Ltd  Reigate Society - Redhill Committee  Strutt & Parker  Reigate Society Architecture & Planing Committee  Strutt & Parker (on behalf of CBRE Global Investors)  Reigate Society Of Artists  Stuarts Tenants' and Residents' Association  Reside Developments Ltd  Sunray Travel  Rey Construction Ltd  Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

18

 Surrey & West Sussex Small Businesses Federation  Thomas Clive & Co  Surrey 50+  Thomas Eggar LLP (on behalf of Asda Stores)  Surrey Archaeological Society  Three  Surrey CC - Public Health  T-Mobile  Surrey CC - Waste  Tornado Property Systems Ltd  Surrey CC – Infrastructure Agreements & CIL  Transport & General Works Union Manager  Transport for London  Surrey Chamber of Commerce  Transport for London Surface Transport  Surrey Community Action Communications  Surrey Countryside Access Forum  Traveller Law Reform Project  Surrey County Council  Trustees of the Belfry Redhill Unit Trust  Surrey Downs CCG  Tudors Professional Services Ltd  Surrey Economic Partnership  Turley Associates  Surrey Federation of Small Business - Regional  Turley Associates Organiser S  UK Env. Project Finance  Surrey Gardens Trust  UK Power Networks  Surrey Green Party  Urban & Rural Planning Solutions (URPS)  Surrey Hills AONB  USS  Surrey Nature Partnership  Vail Williams  Surrey PCT  Vail Williams LLP  Surrey PCT - Head of Estates Planning  Vernon and Co  Surrey Playing Fields Association  Village Developments Strategic Land Limited   Virgin Trains  Surrey Police  VLH Associates (on behalf of Highgrow Properties)  Surrey Primary Care Trust  Vodafone   Vodafone Limited - Environmental and Planning  Sussex & Surrey Police (Planning) Manager  Sustainable Redhill  W & H Motors  Sustainable Redhill  Waitrose (Horley)  Sutton and East Surrey Water  Walton-on-the-Hill Village Forum  Sutton and South Cheam Residents' Association  Warren Drive Frontagers  and Walton Residents Association  Warwick School  Tandridge District Council  Watercolour Residents Association  Tattenhams Community Association  Watson Wyatt  Tattenhams Residents' Association  Wates Developments  Taylor Wimpey  Waverley Borough Council  Taylor Wimpey (South East)  Council  Tenant Farmers Association  West Horley Action for the Environment  Terence O'Rourke Ltd (on behalf of Redhill  West Sussex County Council - Head of Planning Aerodrome) Services  Terrence O'Rourke  Wharf Land Investments Ltd  Tesco Stores  Wharf Land Investments Ltd  Tetlow King Planning  White & Sons  Thakeham Homes  Whitebushes Community Association,  Thames Valley Housing  Wilton Road Residents' Association  Thames Water Property  Woodhatch Community Assocn  Thames Water Utilities Ltd  Woodland Way and The Warren Frontage Owners  Thameslink Association  The Beacon School  Greenbelt & Residents Association  The Chase Residents' Association  Woolf Bond Planning  Wray Common Conservation Area Residents'  The Children's Trust Association  The Colman Institute (Redland Centre)  WS Planning & Architecture  The Field Lane Foundation  WS Planning & Architecture (on behalf of  The McLaren Clark Group JSI Berhad)  The Michael Blacker Partnership  WS Planning & Architecture (on behalf of The Haysan  The Planning Bureau Trust)  The Ramblers Association (Reigate, Redhill and  WYG Planning Horley)  WYG Planning (on behalf of Linden Homes)  The Reigate Society  WYG Planning (on behalf of Sainsburys)  The Reigate Society  YMCA  The Residents' Association of Cromwell Estate  Zambelli Friend Ltd (T.R.A.C.E.)  The Theatres Trust

19

Other Consultees (Individuals)

 A Wilkinson  Colin Knott  Adrian Mezzetti  Colin Lunt  Adrian Scott & Charlotte Witherden  Colin Munro  Adrian Tooms  Colin Smith  Alan and Marilyn Eggleton  D J Turner  Alan Skinner  Dale Millar  Albert and Marnie Simmans  Daniel and LouiseHodges  Alison Swain  Daniella Campbell  Alistair Morten  Darren Strange  Andrea Miles-Owen  David and Kathryn Adams  Andrew and Adele Monk  David and Phillipa Martin  Andrew Clark  David Armstrong  Andrew Cornwall  David Barham  Andrew Sangster  David Briggs  Andrew Cooke  David Clarke  Andy Smith  David Gibbons  Anna Vaughan-Spruce  David Gore  Anne Leighs  David Hall  Anne Wood  David Hayward  Annie Jackson  David Johns  Ann-Julia Dawson  David Wylie  Anthony Dobbin  Dawn H  Anthony James  Debbie Don  Anthony O'Connell  Deborah Elliott  Antoinette Scivier  Deborah Farrer  Astrid Back  Deborah Milne  AWS Bullock  Deborah Reason  Barbara Dean  Deirdre Marples  Beryl Pointon  Denise Coffey  Billy Brom  Derek Budgen  Brian and Daphne Hoad  Derek Poole  Brian and Dawn Smith  Derek Reeves  Brian Cotton  Derek Smith  Carol Bain  Dick Lankester  Carola Penruddock  Donna Fenton  Carole Thomman  Douglas Gatland  Carolyn Hewitt  Dr Alex Highfield  Ceri Blower  Dr Christine Arnold  Charles Daly  Dr Z N Grant-Duff  Charles Wragg  DW Loft  Chinu Patel  E Elgowte  Chinu Patel  Earl & Sare Bassett  Chris Murphy  Edmund Cadman  Christine Addison  Elizabeth Gurteen  Christopher Abbott  Emma Booth  Christopher Brown  Emma Forgie  Christopher Seldon  Emma McAuliffe  Christopher Stevens  Emma Hegedus  Christopher Vallis  Eric Davies  Claire Fisher  Eyvind Ryans  Claire Grinyer  Eyvind Ryans  Claire Woodlock  F G Brown  Clare Wright  Francesca Laws  Clive Elliot  Frazer Tams  CliveBowden  Fred Harrison  CM Byrne  Frederick and Victoria Delasalle  Colin Hoffman  Gabriele Wicke

20

 Gail Hill  Jonathan Reeve  Gary Hills  Jonathan White  Gary Washer  Jonathan Worsley  Gayle Crocker  Judith O'Connell  Geoffrey Finn  Judith Wade  Geoffrey Soper  Julia Boxall  Gill Gibbins  Julia Dawe  Gillian Cole  Julia Thomas  Gillian Elliott  Julian Hemsted  Graham Burr  Julie Goodliffe  Hazel Soper  Justin Stracey  Hazel Wright  Kamal Mehmood  Helen Brooks  Karen Eberhard  Helen Burr  Karen James  Helena Hilliard  Karen Young  Hollie Rowson  Kate Herrington  Hugh Loughlin  Kate Matthews  Huw Davies  Katrina Millard  Ian & Gill Hawkins  Keith and Valerie Edwards  Ian & Julia Mclvor  Kerren Phillips  Ian Corfield  Kerry Quinton  Ian J Reid  Kevin Baughen  Ian Machacek  Kevin Baughen  Irena Richardson  Kevin Downton  Isobel Nott  Kirsten Baron  Ivan Davie  Kirsty Barrett  J Chant  Kirsty Beeke  J Khan  Laura Bedell-Pearce  J.T. Moorin  Lawrence Fairall  James and Deborah Chacksfield  Leonard Davis  James Dean  Lesley Waring  James McAllister  Linda Cope  James Regan  Linda Crundwell  James Wingrove  Lindsay Reyniers  Jamie Brown  Lisa Fairman-Brown  Jan Simpson  Lisa Finn  Jane Fairall  Lisa Goddard  Janice Dixon  Lisa Margerison  Jean Daly  Lise Taylor  Jenny Rawlinson  Luci Mould  Jeremy Wilson  Lucy Beach  Jessica Stevens  Lynn Robertson  Jill O'Reilly  M Benjamin  Jo Hurren  M Butler  Jody Salisbury  M T Morton  Joe and Karen McRandal  Maggie Gatland  John and Jean Ayres  Marian Myland  John and Penny Dancer  Mariea Rudenko  John Cole  Mariln Davies  John Devlin  Mark Bewsey  John Jones  Mark Inwood  John Lissaman  Mark Needham  John Robertson  Mark Smith  John Rowlinson  Marnie Weller  John Sheldrake  Martin Bourke  John Spencer  Martin Burr  John Watson  Martin Dudley  John Williams  Martin Elbourne  Jonathan Harbottle  Martin Hetherington  Jonathan Lowther  Martin Wilkie  Jonathan Quiney  Mary and Dorothy Hickman

21

 Mary Ashdown  Mr Barry Hurley  Mary Hellings  Mr Barry Miles  Mary Hickman  Mr Bernard Smith  Maureen Christmas  Mr Bernard Treanor  Maureen Ford  Mr Bhavna Modi  Maureen Maher  Mr C Narrainen  Maureen Peacock  Mr C.J. Gautrey  Maxine Holliday Rissanen  Mr Carey Ann Dodah  Melanie Lee  Mr Chris Cousins  Melanie Robb  Mr Chris Wray  Michael and Penny Hill  Mr Christopher Gibbs  Michael and Victoria O'Rourke  Mr Christopher Hemsley  Michael Doughty  Mr Colin Dixie  Michael Hellings  Mr Colin Stanbury  Michael Knight  Mr Cyrill Jarvis  Miss Caroline Harrap  Mr D Meyer  Miss Caroline Hobbs  Mr Daniel Davies  Miss Debra Jeffery  Mr David Eccles  Miss Everall  Mr David Howells  Miss Joanna Hurd  Mr David Judge  Miss Robyn Blackburn  Mr David Lambert  Miss Sarah Pinn  Mr David Neame  Miss Vanessa Reeve  Mr David Penna  Mona Johansson  Mr David Pond  Morgana Lefay  Mr David Storer  Mr & Mrs Anthony and Helen Vere Hodge  Mr David Wallis  Mr & Mrs Izod  Mr Dennis Skinner  Mr & Mrs Jeremy and Monica Carter  Mr Derek Allcard  Mr & Mrs Rundle  Mr Doug Lewis  Mr A and Mrs E Knights  Mr Douglas Spooner  Mr A G Drake  Mr Duck  Mr A Jawad  Mr Edward Earle MBE  Mr Adrian Jackson  Mr Eric Reeve and Mrs Susan Reeve  Mr Alan E Munn  Mr Frank Abbott  Mr Alan Ryrie  Mr Frank Creasey  Mr Alan Snowdon  Mr G.R. Barrett  Mr and Mrs A Barraclough  Mr Gerry Clarke  Mr and Mrs A Moulder  Mr Graeme Bridges  Mr and Mrs Brown  Mr Graham Rix  Mr and Mrs Bunn  Mr Graham Roberts  Mr and Mrs Eatenton  Mr Grant Ford  Mr and Mrs Graham Aslet  Mr Green  Mr and Mrs Graham Damer  Mr Hamilton  Mr and Mrs Harold Brown  Mr Hamilton Perry  Mr and Mrs J Odhams  Mr Helier Peter Dreux  Mr and Mrs Jim Beirne  Mr Ian Stagg  Mr and Mrs John Earl  Mr Ian Woodman  Mr and Mrs Peter Cooksey  Mr J and Mrs B Drinkwater  Mr and Mrs Peter Grant  Mr J Rapley  Mr and Mrs Rider  Mr James Barr  Mr and Mrs Ronald Knight  Mr James Elliott  Mr and Mrs Taylor  Mr James Howley  Mr Andrew Free  Mr Jamie Lambert  Mr Andrew McManus  Mr Jason Parry  Mr Andrew Munton  Mr Jason Walters  Mr Andrew Stirling  Mr Jock Blackadder  Mr Angus C. Munro  Mr Joe Watts  Mr Ares Zaimes  Mr John Berge  Mr Arnold Drake  Mr John Bryant  Mr B Nichols  Mr John Cumberland  Mr B Samuel  Mr John Davison

22

 Mr John de la Rue  Mr Richard Olliver  Mr John Goldney  Mr Richard Pitfield-Perry  Mr John Marrington  Mr Richard Schooley  Mr John Monger  Mr Rob Phillips  Mr John Orton  Mr Rob Willock  Mr John Scawin  Mr Robert Davies  Mr John Welch  Mr Robert Thurston  Mr John Williams  Mr Robin McGuinness  Mr Jonathan Harbottle  Mr Robin Sandford  Mr Keith Chipperfield  Mr Roger Harse  Mr Massey  Mr Roger Nelson  Mr Lewis White  Mr Roger Wilman  Mr Lionel Schneider  Mr Ronald Thomas  Mr Lorenzo Oggero  Mr Sach Shah  Mr M Bellerby  Mr Scott Marshall  Mr Malcolm Toye  Mr Simon Alderman  Mr Marcin Wojcik  Mr Simon Humphreys  Mr Mark Best  Mr Stead  Mr Mark Nicholson  Mr Stephen Hewes  Mr Martin Arch  Mr Stephen Hutton  Mr Martin Arch  Mr Stephen Trigg  Mr Mathew Ashton  Mr Steve Lawrenson  Mr Matt Richardson  Mr Steve Macdonald  Mr Michael Bellerby  Mr Stuart Slatter  Mr Michael Bywaters  Mr Stuart Taylor  Mr Michael Fuller  Mr T Hall  Mr Michael Ledwich  Mr Tom Burrell  Mr Michael O'Dell  Mr Tony Blacoe  Mr Michael Shultz  Mr William Taylor  Mr Michael Wellock  Mrs Anderson  Mr Mike J Plummer  Mrs Anne Fawcett  Mr Mike Locke  Mrs Betty A. Amos  Mr Neil Harwick  Mrs Breading  Mr Nicholas Marsh  Mrs Claudia Nelson  Mr Nick Burrell  Mrs D Walter  Mr P Macintyre  Mrs Elaine Gibbs  Mr Paul Allen  Mrs Elizabeth Lambert  Mr Paul Brewer  Mrs Gill Scott-Jones  Mr Paul Brewer  Mrs Hilliard  Mr Paul Groombridge  Mrs J A Newell  Mr Paul Harding  Mrs J Buchan  Mr Paul Newman  Mrs J Burrows  Mr Peter Beckett  Mrs J Wright  Mr Peter Cole  Mrs Jacqueline Jenkins  Mr Peter Forbes  Mrs Jennifer McGrandle  Mr Peter Hieatt  Mrs Joanna Braham  Mr Peter Jones  Mrs Jones  Mr Peter Kefford  Mrs Judith Boyce  Mr Peter Mann  Mrs Julie Fuller  Mr Peter Tarrant  Mrs Lindsey Lawrence  Mr Philip Crayford  Mrs M D Johnson  Mr Philip Greenwood  Mrs M Pinder  Mr Phillip Griffin  Mrs M Tomalin  Mr Qamar Bhatti  Mrs P A Burton  Mr R. G. Bowkett  Mrs P Cosgrove  Mr Raymond Fry  Mrs P E Webb  Mr Raymond Hough  Mrs Parker  Mr Rhys Williams  Mrs Rebecca Winch  Mr Richard Good-Stephenson  Mrs Rochelle Parker  Mr Richard Humphreys  Mrs S Horder  Mr Richard Mantle  Mrs Sally Durrant

23

 Mrs Sandra Rice  Nicholas Stoy  Mrs Sarah Lewis  Nicky Bryant  Mrs Shelley Eagles  Nigel Bennet  Mrs Susan Bracher  Nigel Grinyer  Mrs Susan Holm  Oliver and Joanna Firth  Mrs Theresa Greig  Oliver Brown  Mrs Tracey Johnson  P Elsey  Mrs Victoria Hack  P Hetherington  Ms Alison Bond  P Sarandidis  Ms Carol Hicks  Pam D Aspin  Ms Carole Finbow  Pamela Pretorius  Ms Carolyn Burnley  Pamela Schwenk  Ms Christina Hart  Patrick and Janet Wynne  Ms Debbie Fox  Patrick Maher  Ms Diane Luck  Paul and Penelope Shepherd  Ms Dorothy Hickman  Paul Bingham  Ms Eileen Moran  Paul Featherstone  Ms Eveline Bunn  Paul Grele  Ms Frost Jill  Paul Knight  Ms Gemma Roulston  Paul Rambridge  Ms Jane Glyn  Paul Swain  Ms Jennifer Maddox  Peter and Sarah Woodman  Ms Judith Bunn  Peter Jackson  Ms Judith Sykes  Philip Bennett  Ms June Spooner  Philip Smith  Ms Kate Budd  Philip Wiggs  Ms Katharine Grele  Professor Paul Barber  Ms Kathleen Payne  R A Christmas  Ms Kelly Baker  R Howell  Ms Laura Moss  R I Jones  Ms Leslea Power  Rana Marrington  Ms Madaleine Wagner  Ray Smith  Ms Madeleine Fowler  Rebecca Martin  Ms Margaret Brooks  Rebecca Samuel  Ms Margaret Walking  Rehana Awan  Ms Monica Tingley  Rev Steve Davie  Ms Muriel Oakley  Rhydian Evans  Ms Pauline Sowry  Richard Blambert  Ms Rosanne Miles  Richard Chavasse  Ms Ruth Inwood  Richard Odell  Ms S McManus  Rob Hamilton  Ms Sally Hatton-Savage  Robert and Annabel McNaught  Ms Sally Kelland  Robert Kearsey  Ms Sarah Parsons  Rochelle Parker  Ms Sharon Adams  Roderick Thorpe  Ms Shelly Benson  Roger Marples  Ms Shirley Knight  Roger Rippon  Ms Theresa Goss  Ron and Cathy Keal  Ms Tracy Newman  Ros Ritchie  Ms Valarie Holliday  Rosaline Weil  Ms Yvonne Duley  Rosemary Belcher  Murray van der Poll  Ruby Swan  Nadine Chilton  Ruth Winchester  Natalia Sykes  S Albert  Natalie Hayler  S. Terry  Nathaniel Cross  Sally Scott  Neil Warren  Samuel Foskett  NG Wood  Sandra and Mick Lancley  Nic Collins  Sandra Disdale  Nicholas Dixon  Sandra Fowler  Nicholas Gale  Sandra Gore

24

 Sandy and Barry Lillywhite  Terry Bennett  Santha Dixon  The Silcocks  Sarah Crosbie  Tim Fegan  Sarah Crosbie  Tim Samuel  Scott and Andrew Marshall  Tim Wright  Sharon Warnock  Timothy Fegan  Sim Nathan  Tina Mchale  Simon and Amanda Tyrell and McIntosh  Tobias Biggs  Simon Buckingham  Tony and Karen Abbott  Simon Hill  Tony Howe  Stephen and Alisa Radlett  Tracey Simmons  Stephen and Jane Adams  Vanessa Kane  Stephen and Janice Burbridge  Vicki Ashworth  Stephen Goodbourn  Vicki Williams  Stephen Holloway  Victoria Clifford  Steve Goodbourn  Vincent Robinson  Steven Howe  W Grace  Sue Harrington  Webb  Susan Robinson  Winifred Rose  Suzanne Holloway  Zoe  Sylvia McCoy  Syrie Bibby  Tara Sura  Terry Begley

25

ANNEX 4 Consultation Publicity

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council website: Community Infrastructure Levy page (November – January)

26

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council: Statement of Representations Procedure

27

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council: Statement of Availability

28

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council e-news: May Edition

29

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council e-news: May Edition (News item)

30

Surrey Mirror: 16 April 2015 Edition (Public Notice)

31

Surrey Mirror: 16 April 2015 Edition (Content of Public Notice)

32