DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrogeology and Potential for Ground-Water Development, Carbonate-Rock Aquifers, Southern Nevada and Southeastern California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrogeology and Potential for Ground-Water Development, Carbonate-Rock Aquifers, Southern Nevada and Southeastern California Hydrogeology and Potential for Ground-Water Development, Carbonate-Rock Aquifers, Southern Nevada and Southeastern California By Thomas J. Burbey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 95-4168 Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF NEVADA Carson City, Nevada 1997 NCA - 000569 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0286 email: [email protected] NCA - 000570 CONTENTS Abstract.........................................................................................................................._^ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrogeology of Southern Nevada ........................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................^^ 6 Potential for Ground-Water Development of Carbonate-Rock Aquifers in Selected Hydrographic Areas.......................... 6 Selection of Hydrographic Areas for Analysis .......................................................................................................... 6 Criteria Used to Assess Potential for Ground-Water Development........................................................................... 8 Pahranagat Valley....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Geology ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Potential for Ground-Water Development..................................................................................................... 12 Delamar Valley .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Geology ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Hydrology....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Potential for Ground-Water Development..................................................................................................... 15 Coyote Spring and Kane Springs Valleys and the Muddy River Springs Area ........................................................ 16 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Geology.......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Potential for Ground-Water Development..................................................................................................... 19 Lower Meadow Valley Wash..................................................................................................................................... 19 Hydrographic Setting...................................................................................................................................... 19 Geology.......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Hydrology....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Potential for Ground-Water Development..................................................................................................... 25 Hidden and Garnet Valleys......................................................................................................................................... 25 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Geology.......................................................................................................................................................... 25 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 27 Potential for Ground-Water Development...................................................................................................... 28 Las Vegas Valley........................................................................................................................................................ 29 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Geology.......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Potential for Ground-Water Development..................................................................................................... 34 Tikaboo Valley........................................................................................................................................................... 34 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 34 Geology ......................................................................................................................................................... 34 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 36 Potential for Ground-Water Development...................................................................................................... 37 Three Lakes Valley .................................................................................................................................................... 37 Hydrographic Setting ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Geology ......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 39 Potential for Ground-Water Development...................................................................................................... 40 Indian Springs Valley................................................................................................................................................. 41 Hydrographic Setting...................................................................................................................................... 41 Geology.......................................................................................................................................................... 41 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 Potential for Ground-Water Development...................................................................................................... 44 CONTENTS III NCA - 000571 Amargosa Desert....................................................................................................................................................... 44 Hydrographic Setting...................................................................................................................................... 44 Geology.........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary
    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Tectonic influences on the spatial and temporal evolution of the Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the evolving Pacific – North American plate boundary James E. Faulds and Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Since ~30 Ma, western North America has been evolving from an Andean type mar- gin to a dextral transform boundary. Transform growth has been marked by retreat of magmatic arcs, gravitational collapse of orogenic highlands, and periodic inland steps of the San Andreas fault system. In the western Great Basin, a system of dextral faults, known as the Walker Lane (WL) in the north and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) in the south, currently accommodates ~20% of the Pacific – North America dextral motion. In contrast to the continuous 1100-km-long San Andreas system, discontinuous dextral faults with relatively short lengths (<10-250 km) characterize the WL-ECSZ. Cumulative dextral displacement across the WL-ECSZ generally decreases northward from ≥60 km in southern and east-central California, to ~25 km in northwest Nevada, to negligible in northeast California. GPS geodetic strain rates average ~10 mm/yr across the WL-ECSZ in the western Great Basin but are much less in the eastern WL near Las Vegas (<2 mm/ yr) and along the northwest terminus in northeast California (~2.5 mm/yr). The spatial and temporal evolution of the WL-ECSZ is closely linked to major plate boundary events along the San Andreas fault system. For example, the early Miocene elimination of microplates along the southern California coast, southward steps in the Rivera triple junction at 19-16 Ma and 13 Ma, and an increase in relative plate motions ~12 Ma collectively induced the first major episode of deformation in the WL-ECSZ, which began ~13 Ma along the N60°W-trending Las Vegas Valley shear zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern US 95 & US 93
    UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH CORRIDOR PLAN INCLUDES US 95 SOUTH FROM RAILROAD PASS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE LINE, US 93 TO Southern US 95 and US 93 HOOVER DAM AND US outhern 95 and 93 95 NORTH OF I-215 TO THE CLARK COUNTY LINE WEST OF INDIAN landscapelandscape andand aestheticsaesthetics corridorcorridor planplan SPRINGS DESIGN WORKSHOP PLACES Sand County Studios JW Zunino & Associates CH2MHill December 15, 2006 Southern US 95 and US 93 corridor plan MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR OF NEVADA MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION On June 6, 2002, the Nevada Department of Transportation adopted Landscape and aesthetics are an integral part of the design in as policy, “Pattern and Palette of Place: A Landscape and Aesthetics building and retrofitting our highway system. This Landscape and Master Plan for the Nevada State Highway System.” The second phase Aesthetics Corridor Plan for US 95 and US 93 in Southern Nevada of planning is complete. The Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor helps realize our vision for the future appearance of our highways. Plan represents a significant step forward for the Landscape and The plan will provide the guidance for our own design teams, and Aesthetics program created by the Master Plan because it involves it will help Nevada’s citizens participate in formulating context- local public agencies and citizens in the planning process. Now, sensitive solutions for today’s transportation needs. Together, Nevada’s highways truly represent the State and its people. The we will ensure our highways reflect Nevada’s distinctive heritage, Corridor Plan will be the primary management tool for use in landscape, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Central Nevada
    University of Nevada Reno LATE CENOZOIC GEOLOGY AND TECTONICS OF STEWART AND MONTE CRISTO VALLEYS, WEST - CENTRAL NEVADA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science .I by Mark Philip Molinari fit ; December, 1984 ii ABSTRACT Discontinuous right-normal-slip faults comprise the N30 0W trending, 45 kilometer long Stewart - Monte Cristo fault zone (SMCFZ). Initiation of the SMCFZ postdates the 15.5 to 11.0 m.y. Esmeralda Formation. Right-normal-slip >1 meter occurred on the southern segment of the SMCFZ during the 1932 Cedar Mountain earthquake (Ms= 7.2-7.3). Geomor- phic evidence supports at least three and possibly five or six surface faulting events on the southern segment during the latest Pleistocene and Holocene. Gentle folds in the Esmeralda Formation east of and sub-parallel to the SMCFZ are coeval with and genetically related to faulting. Structural development of the SMCFZ is similar to other right-lateral wrench faults and is consistent with labora- tory wrench fault models. The SMCFZ is the youngest and southeasternmost fault of a system of major late Cenozoic, left-stepping, en echelon right-slip faults in the central Walker Lane. - .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS page ABSTRACT .................. S S ii INTRODUCTION . 0 0 1 0 * I Location and Extent of Study Area . S S S S 1 Regional Tectonic and Geologic Setting. S. S a * 0 1 Purpose and Scope ...... a a * a 5 Methodology . 6 Previous Work . 8 Physiography. 10 MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY. 13 Sedimentary Rocks . & 13 Mina Formation . 13 Luning Formation . 13 Plutonic Rocks .
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene–Early Miocene Paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano Based on Widespread Ash-Flow Tuffs and P
    Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane themed issue Eocene–Early Miocene paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano based on widespread ash-fl ow tuffs and paleovalleys Christopher D. Henry1, Nicholas H. Hinz1, James E. Faulds1, Joseph P. Colgan2, David A. John2, Elwood R. Brooks3, Elizabeth J. Cassel4, Larry J. Garside1, David A. Davis1, and Steven B. Castor1 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA 3California State University, Hayward, California 94542, USA 4Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604, USA ABSTRACT the great volume of erupted tuff and its erup- eruption fl owed similar distances as the mid- tion after ~3 Ma of nearly continuous, major Cenozoic tuffs at average gradients of ~2.5–8 The distribution of Cenozoic ash-fl ow tuffs pyroclastic eruptions near its caldera that m/km. Extrapolated 200–300 km (pre-exten- in the Great Basin and the Sierra Nevada of probably fi lled in nearby topography. sion) from the Pacifi c Ocean to the central eastern California (United States) demon- Distribution of the tuff of Campbell Creek Nevada caldera belt, the lower gradient strates that the region, commonly referred and other ash-fl ow tuffs and continuity of would require elevations of only 0.5 km for to as the Nevadaplano, was an erosional paleovalleys demonstrates that (1) the Basin valley fl oors and 1.5 km for interfl uves. The highland that was drained by major west- and Range–Sierra Nevada structural and great eastward, upvalley fl ow is consistent and east-trending rivers, with a north-south topographic boundary did not exist before with recent stable isotope data that indicate paleodivide through eastern Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Sage OUR 77Th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO
    The Desert Sage OUR 77th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO. 375 http://desertpeaks.org/ In this issue: Chair’s Corner Chair’s Corner Page 2 by Tina Bowman DPS Leadership Page 3 DPS Trips and Events Pages 4-7 Bob Michael’s pro- DPS Election Results Page 7 posal for adding DPS Banquet Flyer Pages 8-9 peaks to the DPS list Outings Chair Page 10 to bring the number Treasurer’s Report Page 10 up to one hundred is DPS List Update Page 10 a good one. So how Membership Report Page 11 do we add peaks? Conservation Chair Page 12 Here are some high- Letter to the Editor Page 12 lights of the process. Passages Page 13 Any member can Trip Reports: propose an addition Corkscrew Peak Page 14 or deletion in writing Smith Mtn. and Stewart Point Pages 14-15 to the Mountaineer- Pyramid Peak Pages 15-16 ing Committee, Mojave Desert Pages 16-17 chaired by the vice chair. Any proposed peak addi- Desert Books Pages 18-21 tion must be scheduled and climbed on a DPS- Great Basin Peaks Section News Page 21 sponsored outing and reported in the Sage before DPS Merchandise Page 22 the ballot appears, and there should be time for pro Sierra Club Membership Application Page 23 and con arguments in several issues of the Sage be- DPS Membership Application Page 23 fore the ballot is sent to members. A majority vote DPS Info Page 24 approves the listing (or delisting) of the peak. The bylaws give the full process here: THE NEXT SAGE SUBMISSION DEADLINE IS JUNE 10, 2018 http://desertpeaks.org/adobepdffiles/ The Desert Sage is published six times a year by bylawsmarch2012.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on January 26, 2010 Geological Society of America Bulletin Sevier Orogenic Belt in Nevada and Utah RICHARD LEE ARMSTRONG Geological Society of America Bulletin 1968;79;429-458 doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1968)79[429:SOBINA]2.0.CO;2 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes Copyright © 1968, The Geological Society of America, Inc. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Stratigraphy and Luminescence Geochronology of the Northeastern Mojave Desert
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary International 166 (2007) 61–78 Late Quaternary stratigraphy and luminescence geochronology of the northeastern Mojave Desert Shannon A. Mahana,Ã, David M. Millerb, Christopher M. Mengesc, James C. Younta aUnited States Geological Survey, Box 25046 MS 974, Denver, CO 80225, USA bUnited States Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 973, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA cUnited States Geological Survey, 520 N. Park Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719-5035, USA Available online 8 January 2007 Abstract The chronology of the Holocene and late Pleistocene deposits of the northeastern Mojave Desert have been largely obtained using radiocarbon ages. Our study refines and extends this framework using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) to date deposits from Valjean Valley, Silurian Lake Playa, Red Pass, and California Valley. Of particular interest are eolian fine silts incorporated in ground- water discharge (GWD) deposits bracketed at 185–140 and 20–50 ka. Alluvial fan deposits proved amenable for OSL by dating both eolian sand lenses and reworked eolian sand in a matrix of gravel that occurs within the fan stratigraphy. Lacustrine sand in spits and bars also yielded acceptable OSL ages. These OSL ages fill gaps in the geochronology of desert deposits, which can provide data relevant to understanding the responses of several depositional systems to regional changes in climate. This study identifies the most promising deposits for future luminescence dating and suggests that for several regions of the Mojave Desert, sediments from previously undated landforms can be more accurately placed within correct geologic map units. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction Previous chronologic studies in the northeastern Mojave Desert area include magneto-stratigraphic studies and Extracting paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental infor- tephrochronology of the upper Pliocene to middle Quatern- mation from terrestrial deposits is an important area of ary Tecopa beds (Hillhouse, 1987; Sarna-Wojcicki et al., Quaternary geologic research.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Montgomery Mountains and the Northern Half of the Nopah and Resting Spring Ranges, Nevada and California
    Structural geology of the Montgomery Mountains and the northern half of the Nopah and Resting Spring Ranges, Nevada and California B. C. BURCHFIEL Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 G. S. HAMILL IV Research and Development Company, Box 36506, Houston, Texas 77036 D. E. WILHELMS U.S. Geological Survey. 345 Middlefield Road. Menlo Park. California 94025 ABSTRACT Ranges, for the most part in California. The area lies between the Amargosa and Pahrump Valleys and southwest of the Spring More than 7,500 m of upper Precambrian and Paleozoic sedi- Mountains (Fig. 1). The generalized geologic map of the area mentary rocks in the area of the Montgomery Mountains and the (Fig. 2) is produced from a more detailed map published in the northern half of the Nopah and Resting Spring Ranges represent a Geological Society of America Map and Chart Series (Burchfiel typical Cordilleran miogeosynclinal sequence. During Mesozoic and others, 1982). The detailed map adjoins the western edge of a time, after a period of earlier Mesozoic folding and high-angle map of the Spring Mountains (at the same scale) by Burchfiel and faulting, these rocks were cut by thrust faults that divided the rock others (1974). sequence into four structural units in the Resting Spring Range and R. B. Rowe was the first geologist to make observations in the the Montgomery Mountains. From the top down, the units are: map area, and his rather limited study is reported in the regional (1) the Montgomery thrust plate, (2) the Baxter thrust plate, (3) the compilation of Spurr (1903).
    [Show full text]
  • 12 7 a 95 NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE C on T Ny 4 040 000 Mn Oa a 12 7 T 12 7 B C 12 2.1 S Ot E P N S O R Ew Cany E Scr Ork O C N O F Ny G 2.5 Ca T Corn Creek Irs E 156 F T
    R. 58 E. R. 59 E. R. 60 E. R. 61 E. R. 62 E. TO INDIAN 640 000 mE 550 000 FT 600 000 FT 660 000 mE 650 000 FT SPRINGS 115º30´ 20´ 10´ 115º00´ 36º30´ 1 6 36º30´ 4 040 000 mN Ewe Canyon 36 31 36 31 35 L ng n o Valley 12 7 a 95 NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE C on t ny 4 040 000 mN oa a 12 7 T 12 7 B C 12 2.1 S ot E p n S o R ew Cany E scr ork O C n o F ny G 2.5 Ca t Corn Creek irs E 156 F T. 17 S. L Well (site) A G N T. 17 S. C D Quail DESERT VIEW C I Spring A A R U Y TO LEE CANYON B-1854 R S NATURAL ENVIROMENT AREA L eek F O S I Cr RD S er Lower White e 31 Corn Creek 36 White Spot Gass D Corn Creek 31 Blotch Spring 36 36 31 36 CREEK Field Station Spring Spring 36 CORN Spring S Upper White A Blotch Spring 1 6 1 6 1 6 MP 1 6 D371 G 1 100 B-1085 N/S E B-1056 N/S V Gass Peak Ca 6943 stl ck V n e Ro 600 000 FT o E y 600 000 FT n a 13.6 C G e ik tr S A DESERT NATIONAL WILDLIFE RANGE y k c T. 18 S. u S L S June Bug Mine RED ROCK CANYON NATIONAL A 99 T.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Ash Meadows Quadrangle Nevada-California
    Geology of the Ash Meadows Quadrangle Nevada-California By CHARLES S. DENNY and HARALD DREWES CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1181-L The history of a desert basin and its bordering highlands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page L56. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract. ______________________________________________________ LI Introduction. ________--__-___-_________-_---------__-_________-__- 2 * Geography. _____________________._.__-_-___--___._________.--- 3 Stratigraphy. ______-__--_______-___-___-_-__-__-___-____________-- 6 Paleozoic rocks _--______________-__---_-_-_--_------_.____-- 6 Rocks of the Resting Spring Range.__-_--___-__-_____-____-_ 7 ** Quartzite of Shadow Mountain...-______________________ 7 Unidentified limestone and dolomite____-__..__.____..._. 7 Rocks of the Devils Hole area_____________________________ 7 Bonanza King Formation__________-_-_--___________-- 8 Nopah Formation.____________________________________ 8 Rocks of the Funeral Mountains.___-______--__-___-_-_____- 9 Hidden Valley Dolomite_____.-____--__-____--__..___- 9 » ' Lost Burro Formation________________________________ 10 Tin Mountain Limestone.______________________________ 10 Perdido (?) Formation....-.--------------.-.---..______
    [Show full text]