DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2015 Annual Report | Jahresbericht The ultrafast and yet selective binding allows the Durch die ultraschnelle, aber zugleich gezielte Bindung receptor (gold) to rapidly travel through the pore rast der Rezeptor (goldfarben) durch die mit ungeord- filled with disordered proteins (blue) into the nucle- neten Proteinen gefüllte Pore in den Zellkern, während us, while any unwanted molecules are kept outside unerwünschte Moleküle ferngehalten werden (siehe (see chapter 2.6, p. 77). Kapitel 2.6, S.77). Image/Bild: Davide Mercadante, Sebastian Sturm, Molecular Biomechanics group. In Memoriam In Memoriam Klaus Tschira und das KIT in Karlsruhe als Mitgesellschafter in die (1940 – 2015) HITS gGmbH eingetreten sind. Genauso wichtig ist aber die Tatsache, dass er jenseits When in mid-2007 Klaus Tschira came up with der strukturellen Vorgaben die Forschungsgruppen völlig the idea of establishing a new institute, he laid © Klaus Tschira Stiftung frei hat arbeiten und entscheiden lassen. Er hat sich im- down three basic rules: mer sehr für ihre Projekte und Ergebnisse interessiert – so It is just as important that, beyond these struc- Als Klaus Tschira Mitte 2007 den Plan zur Einrichtung war er zum Beispiel ein regelmäßiger Teilnehmer an den It was to be called “Heidelberg Institute for The- tural propositions, Klaus Tschira gave the research eines neuen Institutes entwickelte, waren drei Dinge fest montäglichen „Scientific Seminars“ – aber hinsichtlich der oretical Studies” – HITS, for short. (His favorite groups complete freedom to decide on the topics vorgegeben: Themenstellung oder der Methodenauswahl waren und tongue-in-cheek explanation was: “Mannheim has they wanted to investigate and the methods they sind die Gruppen völlig ungebunden. Er hat mit dem a Pop Academy, we have HITS.”) intended to use. He was always very keen on learn- Der Name sollte „Heidelberger Institut für Theoretische HITS eine paradigmatische Einrichtung des „unfettered ing about new projects and new results – he was Studien“ – kurz: HITS – lauten. (Er hat ihn späterhin gern research“ geschaffen, von denen es auf der Welt viel zu It was to become an internationally recognized, in- a regular at the “Scientific Seminars” held every augenzwinkernd so erklärt: „In Mannheim haben sie die wenige (und über die Zeit hin immer weniger) gibt. terdisciplinary research institute covering the nat- other Monday. With HITS, he created a paradig- Pop-Akademie, wir haben die HITS.“) Und Klaus Tschira hat dies nicht getan, um Aufmerk- ural sciences, mathematics and computer science. matic institution for “unfettered research.” There samkeit auf sich zu lenken; das hätte ihm ohnehin nicht aren’t many of them around anymore. Limelight Es sollte ein international sichtbares, interdisziplinäres gelegen. Dagegen war er aufrichtig stolz, wenn er berich- The main aim was not to establish a particular mix for himself was never Klaus Tschira’s motive in Forschungsinstitut auf den Gebieten der Naturwissen- ten konnte, dass die Wissenschaftler des HITS schon drei of research disciplines, but to do top-level cut- doing all this – he was not that kind of person. He schaften, der Mathematik und der Informatik sein. ERC-Grants eingeworben haben oder dass zwei der welt- ting-edge research. was genuinely proud when he could tell people weit meistzitierten Forscher dort arbeiten. Das sind die about the three ERC grants that HITS researchers Ziel sollte nicht eine irgendwie definierte fachliche Aus- Arten von Ergebnissen, die er angestrebt hat und die er als All other decisions were subordinate, simply means had won, or when he was told that two of the most gewogenheit sein, sondern Forschung auf höchstem Niveau. Belohnung seiner eigenen Arbeit ansah. for achieving the goal described by the basic rules. frequently-cited researchers worldwide are mem- Alle, die am HITS arbeiten, stimmen darin überein, We already had “EML Research,” a small, interdis- bers of our institute. Those are the kind of results Alle anderen Entscheidungen waren nachrangig und dass dies ein besonderer Platz ist, ein Ort, in dem freie, ciplinary institute with a good reputation and a he had in mind, he saw them as the rewards for his dienten nur dem Zweck, diese drei Prämissen umzusetzen. Neugier-getriebene Forschung möglich ist und großzügig research agenda fitting in with the above defini- personal efforts. Da gab es z. B. das „EML Research“, ein kleines, multi- unterstützt wird. Dies ist Klaus Tschiras Vermächtnis, und tions. So the pragmatic solution was to use it as All HITSters (the people working at HITS) agree disziplinäres Institut mit gutem Renommee, dessen fachli- wir alle fühlen die Verpflichtung – die zugleich eine große the nucleus of the new institute. The “T” in HITS that this is a special place, a place where you can che Ausrichtung mit der zweiten Vorgabe kompatibel war, Ehre ist –, dieses Vermächtnis zu erhalten und auszu- (referring to the focus on theory) was interpreted pursue curiosity-driven research and get generous also wurde pragmatisch entschieden, dies zum Ausgangs- bauen, ganz im Sinne der ursprünglichen Vorgaben. as “computational science” due to the fact that in support for doing so. This is Klaus Tschira’s legacy, punkt des neuen Institutes zu machen. Das „T“ im Namen Klaus Tschira hat gelegentlich scherzhaft darauf all areas of scientific endeavor, computer-based and we all feel the obligation – it is at the same time (die theoretische Ausrichtung) wurde im Sinne von „Com- hingewiesen, dass wir noch keinen Nobelpreis ans HITS methods are becoming ever more important. And a very great honor – to preserve this legacy and to putational Science“ interpretiert, der in allen Gebieten der geholt hätten, dass ein solcher aber durchaus billigend in when deciding on new research groups, the key build on it, in line with the basic rules he set down Wissenschaften immer wichtiger werdenden Nutzung von Kauf genommen würde. Wir können natürlich in dieser criterion was never the research topic. The only back in 2007. rechnergestützten Methoden bei der Forschung. Und bei Hinsicht nichts versprechen, aber wir alle werden uns sehr thing that mattered was to attract top talents to Klaus Tschira occasionally teased us, pointing der Entscheidung über die Einrichtung neuer Gruppen ernsthaft bemühen. Und auch wenn daraus in absehbarer head our research groups. out that we hadn’t won a Nobel Prize yet and that stand nie die thematische Ausrichtung im Vordergrund; Zeit nichts werden sollte: Es ist für uns alle ein Privileg Klaus Tschira strictly adhered to these princi- he wouldn’t mind at all if we did. Of course, we wichtig war und ist allein, ob es gelingt, herausragende und ein Vergnügen, es hier, im Institut von Klaus Tschi- ples, and he defended them against all attempts cannot promise anything in this respect, but we Wissenschaftler für die Leitung der Gruppen zu gewinnen. ra, versuchen zu dürfen – im Geiste Klaus Tschiras und in to persuade him otherwise. And it was this clarity will do our very best. And even if we do not suc- Diese Prinzipien hat Klaus Tschira konsequent befolgt und Erinnerung an ihn. and this dependability that were the foundation for ceed in the foreseeable future, for all of us it is both auch gegen alle möglichen Versuche der Einflussnahme the high reputation that HITS very quickly earned a privilege and a pleasure to have the chance to try, verteidigt. Und diese Klarheit, diese Verlässlichkeit wa- Andreas Reuter in both the scientific community and in political right here at HITS, in the spirit of Klaus Tschira ren entscheidend dafür, dass sich das HITS in Kreisen circles – and which is demonstrated by the fact and in fond remembrance of him. der Wissenschaft, aber auch in der Politik sehr schnell ein that Heidelberg University and Karlsruhe Institute hohes Ansehen erwerben konnte – was nicht zuletzt dadurch of Technology have become shareholders of HITS. Andreas Reuter zum Ausdruck kommt, dass die Universität Heidelberg 4 5 Inhalt Table of Contents 1 Think Beyond the Limits! 8 – 11 5.1.7 ISESO Symposium 172 5.1.8 ICSB 2015 Tutorial 173 2 Research 12 – 155 5.2 HITS Colloquia 174 2.1 Astroinformatics (AIN) 12 – 23 5.3 Symposium “Klaus Tschira Stiftung 175 2.2 Computational Biology (CBI) 24 – 35 celebrates anniversary with HITS” 2.3 Computational Statistics (CST) 36 – 45 5.4 Stephen Wolfram at HITS 176 2.4 Data Mining and Uncertainty 5.5 Girls’ Day 177 Quantification (DMQ) 46 – 57 5.6 Explore Science 178 – 179 2.5 Groups and Geometry (GRG) 58 – 69 5.7 International Summer Science School 180 2.6 Molecular Biomechanics (MBM) 70 – 81 5.8 Heidelberg Laureate Forum 181 2.7 Molecular and Cellular Modeling (MCM) 82 – 93 5.9 Symposium in honor of Andreas Reuter 182 – 183 2.8 Natural Language Processing (NLP) 94 – 105 2.9 Physics of Stellar Objects (PSO) 106 – 117 6 Cooperations 186 – 187 2.10 Scientific Computing (SCO) 118 – 129 2.11 Scientific Databases and Visualization (SDBV) 130 – 143 7 Publications 188 – 195 2.12 Theoretical Astrophysics (TAP) 144 – 155 8 Teaching 196 – 199 3 Centralized Services 156 – 161 9 Miscellaneous 200 – 215 3.1 Administrative Services 158 9.1 Guest Speaker Activities 200 – 203 3.2 IT Infrastructure and Network 159 – 161 9.2 Presentations 204 – 211 9.3 Memberships 211 – 213 4 Communication and Outreach 162 – 165 9.4 Contributions to the Scientific Community 213 – 215 9.5 Awards 215 5 Events 166 – 183 5.1 Conferences, Workshops & Courses 168 – 173 5.1.1 Computational Molecular Evolution (CoME) Course 168 5.1.2 ISO Meeting 168 – 169 5.1.3 International Conference for Biocuration 169 5.1.4 Annual Meeting of the Association for 170 Computational Linguistics (ACL) 5.1.5 SHENC Symposium on “von Willebrand factor” 171 5.1.6 SEMS Workshop “Data and Models” 171 – 172 1 Think Beyond the Limits! tor grant to set up his own Junior Research group, the support of the Klaus Tschira Stiftung on the High-Energy Astrophysics and Cosmology (HAC), Heidelberg University campus, opened at the end which will start work in April 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article

    Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article

    Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 8, Number 1 (Special Issue: In honor of F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, Part 1 of 2 ) 1—14, 2012 The Work of Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones in Topology and Geometry James F. Davis∗ Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones caused a paradigm shift in high-dimensional topology, away from the view that high-dimensional topology was, at its core, an algebraic subject, to the current view that geometry, dynamics, and analysis, as well as algebra, are key for classifying manifolds whose fundamental group is infinite. Their collaboration produced about fifty papers over a twenty-five year period. In this tribute for the special issue of Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly in their honor, I will survey some of the impact of their joint work and mention briefly their individual contributions – they have written about one hundred non-joint papers. 1 Setting the stage arXiv:1006.1489v2 [math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 In order to indicate the Farrell–Jones shift, it is necessary to describe the situation before the onset of their collaboration. This is intimidating – during the period of twenty-five years starting in the early fifties, manifold theory was perhaps the most active and dynamic area of mathematics. Any narrative will have omissions and be non-linear. Manifold theory deals with the classification of ∗I thank Shmuel Weinberger and Tom Farrell for their helpful comments on a draft of this article. I also profited from reading the survey articles [14] and [4]. 2 James F. Davis manifolds. There is an existence question – when is there a closed manifold within a particular homotopy type, and a uniqueness question, what is the classification of manifolds within a homotopy type? The fifties were the foundational decade of manifold theory.
  • The UK E-Science Core Programme and the Grid Tony Hey∗, Anne E

    The UK E-Science Core Programme and the Grid Tony Hey∗, Anne E

    Future Generation Computer Systems 18 (2002) 1017–1031 The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid Tony Hey∗, Anne E. Trefethen UK e-Science Core Programme EPSRC, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1ET, UK Abstract This paper describes the £120M UK ‘e-Science’ (http://www.research-councils.ac.uk/and http://www.escience-grid.org.uk) initiative and begins by defining what is meant by the term e-Science. The majority of the £120M, some £75M, is funding large-scale e-Science pilot projects in many areas of science and engineering. The infrastructure needed to support such projects must permit routine sharing of distributed and heterogeneous computational and data resources as well as supporting effective collaboration between groups of scientists. Such an infrastructure is commonly referred to as the Grid. Apart from £10M towards a Teraflop computer, the remaining funds, some £35M, constitute the e-Science ‘Core Programme’. The goal of this Core Programme is to advance the development of robust and generic Grid middleware in collaboration with industry. The key elements of the Core Programme will be outlined including details of a UK e-Science Grid testbed. The pilot e-Science projects that have so far been announced are then briefly described. These projects span a range of disciplines from particle physics and astronomy to engineering and healthcare, and illustrate the breadth of the UK e-Science Programme. In addition to these major e-Science projects, the Core Programme is funding a series of short-term e-Science demonstrators across a number of disciplines as well as projects in network traffic engineering and some international collaborative activities.
  • The Fourth Paradigm

    The Fourth Paradigm

    ABOUT THE FOURTH PARADIGM This book presents the first broad look at the rapidly emerging field of data- THE FOUR intensive science, with the goal of influencing the worldwide scientific and com- puting research communities and inspiring the next generation of scientists. Increasingly, scientific breakthroughs will be powered by advanced computing capabilities that help researchers manipulate and explore massive datasets. The speed at which any given scientific discipline advances will depend on how well its researchers collaborate with one another, and with technologists, in areas of eScience such as databases, workflow management, visualization, and cloud- computing technologies. This collection of essays expands on the vision of pio- T neering computer scientist Jim Gray for a new, fourth paradigm of discovery based H PARADIGM on data-intensive science and offers insights into how it can be fully realized. “The impact of Jim Gray’s thinking is continuing to get people to think in a new way about how data and software are redefining what it means to do science.” —Bill GaTES “I often tell people working in eScience that they aren’t in this field because they are visionaries or super-intelligent—it’s because they care about science The and they are alive now. It is about technology changing the world, and science taking advantage of it, to do more and do better.” —RhyS FRANCIS, AUSTRALIAN eRESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL F OURTH “One of the greatest challenges for 21st-century science is how we respond to this new era of data-intensive
  • Preface Issue 4-2014

    Preface Issue 4-2014

    Jahresber Dtsch Math-Ver (2014) 116:199–200 DOI 10.1365/s13291-014-0108-4 PREFACE Preface Issue 4-2014 Hans-Christoph Grunau © Deutsche Mathematiker-Vereinigung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 The last few years have been a good time for solving long standing geometrical- topological conjectures. This issue reports on the solution of the Willmore conject-√ ure—the “best” topological torus is a “real” torus with ratio of radii equal to 2— and one of Thurston’s conjectures—every hyperbolic 3-manifold can be fibered over a circle, up to passing to a finite cover. Starting in the 1960s, Thomas Willmore studied the integral of the squared mean curvature of surfaces in R3 as the simplest but most interesting frame invariant elas- tic bending energy. This energy had shown up already in the early 19th century—too early for a rigorous investigation. Willmore asked: What is the shape of a compact surface of fixed genus minimising the Willmore energy in this class? (In the 1990s, existence of minimisers was proved by Leon Simon, with a contribution by Matthias Bauer and Ernst Kuwert.) Willmore already knew that the genus-0-minimiser is a sphere. Assuming that symmetric surfaces require less energy than asymmetric ones (which has not been proved, yet) he studied families√ of geometric tori with the smaller radius 1 fixed and found that the larger radius 2 would yield the minimum in this very special family. He conjectured that this particular torus would be the genus- 1-minimiser. Almost 50 years later Fernando Marques and André Neves found and published a 100-page-proof.
  • Arxiv:2103.09350V1 [Math.DS] 16 Mar 2021 Nti Ae Esuytegopo Iainltransformatio Birational Vue

    Arxiv:2103.09350V1 [Math.DS] 16 Mar 2021 Nti Ae Esuytegopo Iainltransformatio Birational Vue

    BIRATIONAL KLEINIAN GROUPS SHENGYUAN ZHAO ABSTRACT. In this paper we initiate the study of birational Kleinian groups, i.e. groups of birational transformations of complex projective varieties acting in a free, properly dis- continuous and cocompact way on an open subset of the variety with respect to the usual topology. We obtain a classification in dimension two. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Varietiesofnon-negativeKodairadimension 6 3. Complex projective Kleinian groups 8 4. Preliminaries on groups of birational transformations ofsurfaces 10 5. BirationalKleiniangroupsareelementary 13 6. Foliated surfaces 19 7. Invariant rational fibration I 22 8. InvariantrationalfibrationII:ellipticbase 29 9. InvariantrationalfibrationIII:rationalbase 31 10. Classification and proof 43 References 47 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Birational Kleinian groups. 1.1.1. Definitions. According to Klein’s 1872 Erlangen program a geometry is a space with a nice group of transformations. One of the implementations of this idea is Ehres- arXiv:2103.09350v1 [math.DS] 16 Mar 2021 mann’s notion of geometric structures ([Ehr36]) which models a space locally on a geom- etry in the sense of Klein. In his Erlangen program, Klein conceived a geometry modeled upon birational transformations: Of such a geometry of rational transformations as must result on the basis of the transformations of the first kind, only a beginning has so far been made... ([Kle72], [Kle93]8.1) In this paper we study the group of birational transformations of a variety from Klein and Ehresmann’s point of vue. Let Y be a smooth complex projective variety and U ⊂ Y a connected open set in the usual topology. Let Γ ⊂ Bir(Y ) be an infinite group of birational transformations.
  • Mostow and Artin Awarded 2013 Wolf Prize

    Mostow and Artin Awarded 2013 Wolf Prize

    Mostow and Artin Awarded 2013 Wolf Prize rigidity methods and techniques opened a flood- gate of investigations and results in many related areas of mathematics. Mostow’s emphasis on the “action at infinity” has been developed by many mathematicians in a variety of directions. It had a huge impact in geometric group theory, in the study of Kleinian groups and of low-dimensional topology, and in work connecting ergodic theory and Lie groups. Mostow’s contribution to math- ematics is not limited to strong rigidity theorems. His work on Lie groups and their discrete sub- groups, which was done during 1948–1965, was very influential. Mostow’s work on examples of nonarithmetic lattices in two- and three-dimen- sional complex hyperbolic spaces (partially in Photo: Donna Coveney. Photo: Michael Marsland/Yale. collaboration with P. Deligne) is brilliant and led George D. Mostow Michael Artin to many important developments in mathematics. In Mostow’s work one finds a stunning display of The 2013 Wolf Prize in Mathematics has been a variety of mathematical disciplines. Few math- awarded to: ematicians can compete with the breadth, depth, George D. Mostow, Yale University, “for his and originality of his works. fundamental and pioneering contribution to ge- Michael Artin is one of the main architects ometry and Lie group theory.” of modern algebraic geometry. His fundamental Michael Artin, Massachusetts Institute of contributions encompass a bewildering number Technology, “for his fundamental contributions of areas in this field. to algebraic geometry, both commutative and To begin with, the theory of étale cohomology noncommutative.” was introduced by Michael Artin jointly with Al- The prize of US$100,000 will be divided equally exander Grothendieck.
  • Abraham Robinson 1918–1974

    Abraham Robinson 1918–1974

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ABRAHAM ROBINSON 1918–1974 A Biographical Memoir by JOSEPH W. DAUBEN Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 82 PUBLISHED 2003 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. Courtesy of Yale University News Bureau ABRAHAM ROBINSON October 6, 1918–April 11, 1974 BY JOSEPH W. DAUBEN Playfulness is an important element in the makeup of a good mathematician. —Abraham Robinson BRAHAM ROBINSON WAS BORN on October 6, 1918, in the A Prussian mining town of Waldenburg (now Walbrzych), Poland.1 His father, Abraham Robinsohn (1878-1918), af- ter a traditional Jewish Talmudic education as a boy went on to study philosophy and literature in Switzerland, where he earned his Ph.D. from the University of Bern in 1909. Following an early career as a journalist and with growing Zionist sympathies, Robinsohn accepted a position in 1912 as secretary to David Wolfson, former president and a lead- ing figure of the World Zionist Organization. When Wolfson died in 1915, Robinsohn became responsible for both the Herzl and Wolfson archives. He also had become increas- ingly involved with the affairs of the Jewish National Fund. In 1916 he married Hedwig Charlotte (Lotte) Bähr (1888- 1949), daughter of a Jewish teacher and herself a teacher. 1Born Abraham Robinsohn, he later changed the spelling of his name to Robinson shortly after his arrival in London at the beginning of World War II. This spelling of his name is used throughout to distinguish Abby Robinson the mathematician from his father of the same name, the senior Robinsohn.
  • Mr Chancellor

    Mr Chancellor

    ANTHONY JOHN GRENVILLE HEY DCL Mr Chancellor, “All the world's a stage … and one man in his time plays many parts”. Of no-one is this truer than of Professor Tony Hey. He does indeed stride the world stage, and has successively been at the forefront of particle physics, computing science, research programme direction, the popularization of ‘hard science’, and the stimulation of innovation in the world’s foremost software company. Notwithstanding his thirty-one years of service to the University of Southampton in a succession of ever more senior academic posts, Tony’s most recent appointment (as Corporate Vice President of Technical Computing at Microsoft) actually marks the sixth time he has set up camp in the United States: one gets the impression that only the QE2 might exceed his record for round-trips between Southampton and the USA! The roots of his long-term fascination with America were laid immediately after he completed his PhD at Oxford, when he took up a Harkness Fellowship at Caltech to work at the forefront of particle physics with two Nobel Prize Winners: Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann. The spirit of openness, drive and adventure with which his American colleagues were imbued made a lasting impression on Tony. 1 After leaving the USA, Tony spent two years in Geneva as a Research Fellow at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Later to become the birthplace of the worldwide web, in the early 1970s CERN was rapidly expanding its unique facilities for probing subatomic particles, and Tony worked in a team which developed the theoretical under-pinning for much of modern quantum physics.
  • First Report of ASCAC-OSTI Subcommittee

    First Report of ASCAC-OSTI Subcommittee

    First Report of ASCAC-OSTI Subcommittee Tony Hey Subcommittee Chair eScience Institute University of Washington [email protected] What Is OSTI? OSTI is a program within DOE’s Office of Science, with a Since 1947! corporate responsibility for ensuring access to DOE R&D results. Public access to unclassified, unlimited Restricted access to classified and sensitive Slide courtesy of Brian Hitson DOE STI Program • OSTI manages agency-wide program – STIP • Responsibilities defined in DOE O 241.1B • Broad network of STI managers across DOE complex • R&D results collected electronically from Labs and Grantees • STI Submissions by year FY12 FY13 FY14 20,205 28,793 41,867 Slide courtesy of Brian Hitson Context: OSTP Memorandum • Directive requiring the major Federal Funding agencies “to develop a plan to support increased public access to the results of research funded by the Federal Government.” • The memorandum defines digital data “as the digital recorded factual material commonly accepted in the scientific community as necessary to validate research findings including data sets used to support scholarly publications, but does not include laboratory notebooks, preliminary analyses, drafts of scientific papers, plans for future research, peer review reports, communications with colleagues, or physical objects, such as laboratory specimens.” 22 February 2013 DOE Public Access Plan, July 24, 2014 Public Access to Scientific Publications • OSTI is responsible for operating and maintaining DOE’s public access system and network • The submission of
  • Armand Borel 1923–2003

    Armand Borel 1923–2003

    Armand Borel 1923–2003 A Biographical Memoir by Mark Goresky ©2019 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. ARMAND BOREL May 21, 1923–August 11, 2003 Elected to the NAS, 1987 Armand Borel was a leading mathematician of the twen- tieth century. A native of Switzerland, he spent most of his professional life in Princeton, New Jersey, where he passed away after a short illness in 2003. Although he is primarily known as one of the chief archi- tects of the modern theory of linear algebraic groups and of arithmetic groups, Borel had an extraordinarily wide range of mathematical interests and influence. Perhaps more than any other mathematician in modern times, Borel elucidated and disseminated the work of others. family the Borel of Photo courtesy His books, conference proceedings, and journal publica- tions provide the document of record for many important mathematical developments during his lifetime. By Mark Goresky Mathematical objects and results bearing Borel’s name include Borel subgroups, Borel regulator, Borel construction, Borel equivariant cohomology, Borel-Serre compactification, Bailey- Borel compactification, Borel fixed point theorem, Borel-Moore homology, Borel-Weil theorem, Borel-de Siebenthal theorem, and Borel conjecture.1 Borel was awarded the Brouwer Medal (Dutch Mathematical Society), the Steele Prize (American Mathematical Society) and the Balzan Prize (Italian-Swiss International Balzan Foundation). He was a member of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, the Finnish Academy of Sciences and Letters, the Academia Europa, and the French Academy of Sciences.1 1 Borel enjoyed pointing out, with some amusement, that he was not related to the famous Borel of “Borel sets." 2 ARMAND BOREL Switzerland and France Armand Borel was born in 1923 in the French-speaking city of La Chaux-de-Fonds in Switzerland.
  • Agenda All Presentations Will Take Place in the Main Meeting Room in the Training Centre

    Agenda All Presentations Will Take Place in the Main Meeting Room in the Training Centre

    The PharmaGRID Retreat Organized by The PRISM Forum June 30th-July 2nd 2003 The Node Conference Centre, Welwyn, UK Agenda All presentations will take place in the main meeting room in the training centre. Lunch will be served in the Dining Room, which is located in the main building. Dinner on the evening on June 30th will be held in the main dining room, and BBQ will take place on the evening of July 1st. Pre-dinner drinks will be served in the bar or on the terrace outside the dining room if the weather is pleasant. The Node makes tea and coffee available throughout the day in the Bar and in the meeting rooms. Please help yourself. Coffee will be available during the coffee breaks in the Sponsor Room located directly opposite the main event room. June 30th- Setting the Scene 15:30 Tea/Coffee/Registration 16:15 Introduction Chris Jones 16:45 GRID Computing Prof. Tony Hey Professor Tony Hey, Director UK e -Science Core Programme and Editor of recent book on GRID Computing. For more information see: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~ajgh http://www.research-councils.ac.uk/escience 17:30 Particle Physics GRIDS Prof. Hans Hoffmann Director for Technology Transfer and Scientific Computing in the CERN directorate, responsible for the LHC Computing Grid. For more information see: http://www.twgrid.org/event/isgc2003/cv/hoffmann.pdf 18:15 BIRN Prof. Mark Ellisman Professor Mark Ellisman, Department of Neurosciences, UCSD, and Principal Investigator, Biomedical Information Research Network (BIRN). For more information see: http://www.sdsc.edu/Partners/Fellows/bios/mellisman.html 19:00 Open Discussion “Where do we want to go?” Chris Jones & Howard Bilofsky 19:30 Aperitifs 20:00 Dinner July 1st- The State of the Art 08:30 Chairman's Remarks Rene Ziegler 08:45 EU Funding for the GRID and directions Dr.
  • Constraint-Based Pattern Mining from Classic Pattern Domains to More Sophisticated Ones

    Constraint-Based Pattern Mining from Classic Pattern Domains to More Sophisticated Ones

    Constraint-Based Pattern Mining From classic pattern domains to more sophisticated ones Marc Plantevit October 2016 Universit´eClaude Bernard Lyon 1 { LIRIS CNRS UMR5205 * Slides from the ´eEGClecture. About me. [email protected] or [email protected] Associate Professor Computer Science Dept. University Claude Bernard Lyon 1. Lab: LIRIS UMR 5205 Team: Data Mining & Machine Learning Research Interest: Fondations of constraint-based pattern mining, sequences, augmented graphs. Before: Ph.D from University Montpellier II (LIRMM), Post-Doc at Univ. Caen (GREYC). M. Plantevit Constraint-Based Pattern Mining 2 / 118 N Introduction Outline 1 Introduction 2 Frequent Itemset Mining Frequent Itemset Mining Condensed Representations 3 Constraint-based Pattern Mining Constraint properties Algorithmic principles Constraint-based pattern mining with preferences 4 Toward More Sophisticated Pattern Domains Sequence, graphs, dense subgraphs Attributed Graph Mining 5 Conclusion M. Plantevit Constraint-Based Pattern Mining 3 / 118 N Introduction Evolution of Sciences Before 1600: Empirical Science Babylonian mathematics: 4 basis operations done with tablets and the resolution of practical problems based on words describing all the steps. ) that worked and they manage to solve 3 degree equations. Ancient Egypt: No theorization of algorithms. We give only examples made empirically, certainly repeated by students and scribes. Empirical knowledge, transmitted as such, and not a rational mathematical science. Aristotle also produced many biological writings that were empirical in nature, focusing on biological causation and the diversity of life. He made countless observations of nature, especially the habits and attributes of plants and animals in the world around him, classified more than 540 animal species, and dissected at least 50.