DOCSLIB.ORG

NW Atl Canadian Swordfish Longline Final Report 082011.Doc I Moody Marine Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NW Atl Canadian Swordfish Longline Final Report 082011.Doc I Moody Marine Ltd $MSC ASSESSMENT North Atlantic Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) Canadian Pelagic Longline Fishery VOLUME 1: FINAL REPORT AND DETERMINATION Contract Number: 09-01 Nova Scotia Swordfish Version: Final Report and Determination Certificate No.: Date: 22 August 2011 Client: Nova Scotia Swordfishermen’s Association MSC reference standards: MSC Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing, Nov, 2004. MSC Accreditation Manual Version 5, August 2005 MSC Fisheries Certification Methodology (FCM) Version 6, September 2006 MSC TAB Directives (All) MSC Chain of Custody Certification Methodology (CoC CM) Version 6. November 2005 MSC Fisheries Assessment Methodology, Version 1, July 2008 Accredited Certification Body: Moody Marine Ltd. 99 Wyse Road, Suite 815 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B3A 4S5 Assessment Team Mr. Steven Devitt, B.Sc. Moody Marine Ltd. Ms. Amanda Park, M.M.M. Moody Marine Ltd. Mr. Robert O’Boyle, Beta Scientific Consulting Inc. Mr. Jean-Jacques Maguire Dr. Michael Sissenwine Moody Marine Ltd. NW Atlantic Canadian Longline Swordfish: Final Report Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Unit of Certification ............................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Point of Entry in Chain of Custody and Eligibility ......................................... 3 1.2 The Client ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Client Operation ..................................................... 5 1.5 Conditions and Recommendations ........................................................................ 6 2.0 Background to the Report ....................................................................................... 7 2.1 Authors and Peer Reviews. .................................................................................... 7 2.2 Previous Assessments .......................................................................................... 10 2.3 Field Inspections .................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Consultations ........................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Fishery Background Information ......................................................................... 13 3.1 The Target Species ............................................................................................... 13 3.2 Candidate Fishery ............................................................................................... 16 3.3 Historical Management Context .......................................................................... 17 3.4 The Fishery Area of Operation ............................................................................ 18 3.5 Fleet, gear and harvest controls ........................................................................... 20 3.6 Catch .................................................................................................................... 28 3.7 Retained Species .................................................................................................. 31 3.8 Bycatch Species .................................................................................................. 35 3.9 Interactions with Endangered, Threatened and Protected (ETP) Species ............ 42 3.10 Categorization of species in MSC assessment .................................................... 45 4.0 Management System .............................................................................................. 47 4.1 Management System and Objectives ................................................................... 47 4.2 Management Plan ................................................................................................. 49 5.0 Stock Health Evaluation ........................................................................................ 52 5.1 Stock Health Monitoring ...................................................................................... 52 5.2 Current Stock Status ............................................................................................ 53 6.0 MSC Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing ........................................ 56 7.0 Fishery Evaluation Process ................................................................................... 60 7.1 Certification Process ............................................................................................ 60 7.2 Other Fisheries in the Area .................................................................................. 62 8.0 Fishery Performance ............................................................................................. 63 8.1 Interpretation of the MSC Standard ..................................................................... 63 8.2 Scoring Methodology ........................................................................................... 63 8.3 Submission of Data on the Fishery ...................................................................... 64 8.4 Performance Evaluations ..................................................................................... 65 9.0 Tracking, Tracing Fish And Fish Products ......................................................... 66 10.0 Certification Recommendation ........................................................................... 68 NW Atl Canadian Swordfish Longline Final Report_082011.doc i Moody Marine Ltd. NW Atlantic Canadian Longline Swordfish: Final Report 10.1 Conditions ........................................................................................................... 68 10.2 Principle 1 Conditions ........................................................................................ 68 10.3 Principle 2 Conditions ........................................................................................ 71 10.4 Principle 3 Conditions ........................................................................................ 79 11 Assessment Results .................................................................................................. 84 Note: Due to the size of the report, Appendices containing supporting information are contained in separate volumes. Volume 2 Appendix 1: ICCAT Swordfish Statistical Document Appendix 2: DFO Support for Client Action Plan Appendix 3: Summary of Submitted Concerns/Issues During Public Comment Periods and How Each Was Addressed Appendix 4: Written Submissions Received From Stakeholders Following Consultation Periods Appendix 5: Comments From the Second Stakeholder Consultation Period (November 18, 2010 – December 23, 2010). Appendix 6: Peer Review Comments Volume 3 Appendix 7.0 Appendix 7.1: Written Submission Received Prior to the Site Visit Appendix 7.2: Site Visit Meeting Summaries Appendix 8.0: Stakeholder Comments and Team Responses from PCDR Comment Period Appendix 8.1 – Comments from 35 Stakeholder Groups and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.2 – Comments from B. Worm Lab @ Dalhousie University Department of Biology and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.3 – Comments from David Suzuki Foundation and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.4 – Comments from Ecology Action Center and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.5 – Comments from Friends of Hector Email Campaign and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.6 – Comments from Katie McLean and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.7 – Comments from Oceana and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.8 – Comments from Canadian Shark Conservation Society and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.9 – Comments from National Marine Fisheries Service and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.10 – Comments from Sierra Club of Canada – Atlantic Canada Chapter and CB/ Team Responses NW Atl Canadian Swordfish Longline Final Report_082011.doc ii Moody Marine Ltd. NW Atlantic Canadian Longline Swordfish: Final Report Appendix 8.11 – Comments from Sven Koschinski and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 8.12 – Comments from WWF and CB/ Team Responses Appendix 9: Comments from MSC and CB Responses TABLES Table 1: Agenda for the North Atlantic Swordfish Longline and Harpoon Certification Assessment Visit, July 21-24, 2009 .................................................................................. 12 Table 2: Objectives Hierarchy for Management of the Scotia-Fundy Swordfish Fishery 21 Table 3: Summary of International and Domestic Objectives and Management Measures for the Swordfish and Other Tunas Fisheries by Species ................................................. 22 Table 4: Percentage At-Sea Observer Coverage, 2001 – 2010. ........................................ 27 Table 5: Landings of Atlantic Swordfish by the Canadian pelagic longline fleet, 1987- 2008. .................................................................................................................................. 30 Table 6: Catch composition and weights of retained species from the longline large pelagic hauls, 2002 to 2009. ............................................................................................. 32 Table 7: Catch composition and weights of observed bycatch from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nbr First Edition Update Table 4.1 Southeast Region
    NBR FIRST EDITION UPDATE TABLE 4.1 SOUTHEAST REGION FISH BYCATCH BY FISHERY Bycatch estimates are in live pounds or number of individuals, except where indicated, and reflect the average from the years identified. Fishery bycatch ratio = bycatch / (bycatch + landings). Some bycatch ratios (marked **) could not be developed, e.g., where bycatch was by weight and numbers of individuals, and landings were in pounds. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME YEAR BYCATCH UNIT CV FOOTNOTE(S) Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico HMS Pelagic Longline # Albacore Thunnus alalunga 2010 1,918.02 POUND Bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus 2010 26,080.69 POUND b Blackfin tuna Thunnus atlanticus 2010 4,512.86 POUND Blue marlin Makaira nigricans 2010 66,418.67 POUND b Blue shark Prionace glauca 2010 368,449.76 POUND c Bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus 2010 329,849.02 POUND Coastal shark group 1 - South Atlantic 2010 32,216.15 POUND Coastal shark group 2 - South Atlantic 2010 66.14 POUND b Sailfish Istiophorus platypterus 2010 9,061.00 POUND b Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis 2010 859.80 POUND Swordfish Xiphias gladius 2010 303,408.98 POUND White marlin Kajikia albida 2010 32,546.84 POUND Yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares 2010 24,918.85 POUND TOTAL FISHERY BYCATCH 1,200,306.78 POUND TOTAL FISHERY LANDINGS 3,916,146.00 POUND TOTAL CATCH (Bycatch + Landings) 5,116,452.78 POUND FISHERY BYCATCH RATIO (Bycatch/Total Catch) 0.23 Gulf of Mexico Coastal Migratory Pelagic Gillnet Atlantic bonito Sarda sarda 2006-2010 102.86 INDIVIDUAL Sea catfishes Ariidae 2006-2010 14,348.40 INDIVIDUAL TOTAL FISHERY
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics of an Attached Remora
    Zoology 119 (2016) 430–438 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoology journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/zool Theoretical and computational fluid dynamics of an attached remora (Echeneis naucrates) a,∗ b c,d e Michael Beckert , Brooke E. Flammang , Erik J. Anderson , Jason H. Nadler a Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA c Department of Mechanical Engineering, Grove City College, Grove City, PA 16127, USA d Department of Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA e Advanced Concepts Laboratory, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Remora fishes have a unique dorsal suction pad that allows them to form robust, reliable, and reversible Received 22 October 2015 attachment to a wide variety of host organisms and marine vessels. Although investigations of the suction Received in revised form 5 April 2016 pad have been performed, the primary force that remoras must resist, namely fluid drag, has received Accepted 8 June 2016 little attention. This work provides a theoretical estimate of the drag experienced by an attached remora Available online 13 June 2016 using computational fluid dynamics informed by geometry obtained from micro-computed tomography. Here, simulated flows are compared to measured flow fields of a euthanized specimen in a flow tank. Keywords: Additionally, the influence of the host’s boundary layer is investigated, and scaling relationships between Drag Attachment remora features are inferred from the digitized geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hitchhiker Guide to Manta Rays: Patterns of Association Between Mobula Alfredi, M
    Turner, K. M. E. (2021). A hitchhiker guide to manta rays: patterns of association between Mobula alfredi, M. birostris, their symbionts, and other fishes in the Maldives. PLoS ONE, 16(7), [e0253704]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253704 Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1371/journal.pone.0253704 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Public Library of Science at 10.1371/journal.pone.0253704. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ A hitchhiker guide to manta rays: patterns of association between Mobula alfredi, M. birostris, their symbionts, and other fishes in the Maldives Aimee E. Nicholson-Jack 1,2¶*, Joanna L. Harris 1,3¶, Kirsty Ballard1&, Katy M. E. Turner2& and Guy M. W. Stevens 1¶ 1 The Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Norwood Lane, Corscombe, Dorset, UK 2 School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK 3 School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, UK *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] (AENJ) ¶These authors contributed equally to this work. &These authors also contributed equally to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Remora's Symbiotic Relationships
    Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Remora’s Symbiotic Relationships MARINE 2021 Yunxin Xu1*, Weichao Shi2 and Abel Arredongo-Galeana3 1 Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Henry Dyer Building, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK., e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Henry Dyer Building, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK., email: [email protected] 2 Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Henry Dyer Building, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK., email: [email protected] * Corresponding author: Yunxin Xu, [email protected] ABSTRACT Symbiotic relationships have developed through natural evolution which can provide advantages to parties in terms of survival. For example, that of the remora fish attached to the body of a shark to compensate for their poor swimming ability. From the remora’s perspective, this could be associated to an increased hydrodynamic efficiency in swimming and this needs to be investigated. To understand the remora's swimming strategy in the attachment state, a systematic study has been conducted using the commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics CFD software, STAR-CCM+ to analyse and compare the resistance characteristics of the remora in attached swimming conditions. Two fundamental questions are addressed: what is the effect of the developed boundary layer flow and the effect of the adverse pressure gradient on the remora’s hydrodynamic characteristics? By researching the hydrodynamic characteristics of the remora on varying attachment locations, the remora’s unique behaviours could be applied to autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), which currently cannot perform docking and recovery without asking the mother vehicle to come for a halt.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 294 Trz AMERICAN MUSEUM Oi NATURAL History Jan
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 294 TRz AMERICAN MUSEUM Oi NATURAL HIsTORY Jan. 28, 1928 59.7, 58 E THE SMALLEST KNOWN SPECIMENS OF THE SUCKING- FISHES, REMORA BRACHYPTERA AND RHOMBOCHIRUS OSTEOCHIR BY E. W. GUDGER In a previous paper,' based on an exceptional collection of young Echeneididae, I brought together all the data, both new and previously published, descriptive of the smallest known specimens of these most interesting fishes. This paper was illustrated with figures (three of them never before published) of four of the eight species enumerated in Jordan and Evermann's 'Fishes of North and Middle America.' While this paper was in press, I received from the Danish investigator, A. tedel TAning, a paper2 in which he described post-larval stages of Remora remora as small as 5.6 mm., and of Echeneis lineata as short as 14 mm.- specimens much smaller than mine. My smallest Rhombochirus osteochir was 68 mm. over all and 61 mm. from tip of snout to base of caudal fin. Two other specimens measured in total length 73 and 105 mm. respectively. The smallest fish was taken from the gills of a sailfish (Tetrapturus sp.?) at Long Key, Florida, and was presented to the Museum by Mr. Hamilton M. Wright of this city. Mr. Wright, knowing my great interest in and desire for small shark- suckers, later enlisted the kind co-operation of Mr. H. W. Mittag, Secretary of the Miami Anglers' Club of Miami, Florida, and he in turn secured the help of the boatmen having boats for charter to anglers.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Bio-Inspired Model to Understand the Evolution of the Remora Adhesive Disk
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Theses Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-31-2017 Using a bio-inspired model to understand the evolution of the remora adhesive disk Kaelyn Mykel Gamel New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Gamel, Kaelyn Mykel, "Using a bio-inspired model to understand the evolution of the remora adhesive disk" (2017). Theses. 19. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/19 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Resources Management ARM 105 1.0 Ichthyology Practical No
    Aquatic Resources Management 1st ARM 105 1.0 Ichthyology Y E Practical No.01 (Virtual) A Fish Morphology and Identification R 1st S E M E S T E R 30/06/2021 Myxine sp. / Hag fish Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Myxiniforms • Body shape: Eel like / elongated • Mouth type: Protrusible • Teeth type: Tooth like structures (Keratin) • Feeding habit: Scavengers Figure 01: Myxine sp. • Scale type: No scales • Habitat: Marine environment • Specifications: . Cartilaginous fish . Jawless . Barbels around the mouth Figure 02: Body parts of Myxine sp. Loose skin . Fin is not differentiated . Eye spots Polypterus sp. / Bichir Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Polyperiforms • Body shape: Elongated with dorsoventrally flattened head and laterally flattened tail • Mouth type: Terminal • Teeth type: Small, pointed teeth • Feeding habit: Carnivorous Figure 03: Polypterus sp. • Scale type: Ganoid scales • Habitat: Fresh water environment • Specifications: . Serrated dorsal fin . Pointed, flat caudal fin . Grow up to 2-3 feet Figure 04: Body parts of Polypterus sp. Lungs without trachea Protopterus sp. / Lung fish Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Lepidosireniformes • Body shape: Eel like / elongated • Mouth type: Protrusible upper jaw / pointed • Teeth type: Covered with true enamel • Feeding habit: Carnivorous Figure 05: Protopterus sp. • Scale type: Cycloid scales • Habitat: Fresh water environment • Specifications: . Bony fish . Demersal . Walking leg like structures . Fused dorsal and caudal fins Figure 06: Body parts of Protopterus sp. Initially external gills and adults have lungs Acipenser sp. / Sturgeon Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes • Body shape: Elongated • Mouth type: Duck like Figure 07: Acipenser sp. • Teeth type: No teeth • Feeding habit: Omnivorous • Scale type: Ganoid scales • Habitat: Fresh water and marine environment • Specifications: .
    [Show full text]
  • By Abigail Alling When Attached to a Whale a Remora May Look Like A
    A by Abigail Alling When attached to a whale a remora may look like a mon- hat relation exists, then, between a remora and a whale, strous leech, but it is actually a specialized fish, unique in hy are these fish found most often on blue whales? having a powerful sucker on the top of its head. This sucker- Strasburg (1959) examined the stomach contents of disk makes it possible for the remora to attach itself to ecies of remora and concluded that the relation other, larger, marine animals. Scientists speculate that t between remora and host is different for each remora spe- relation is a commensal one (an interaction between two e remora's dependency on a larger animal during organisms where only one benefits without causing the other ontogeny and maturity varies according to the species, as harm) and not mutual or parasitic. But little research on this well as to the type of foods consumed. Some remoras release interaction between fish and whale has been done, and very their suction once the host has captured the prey and is in little is known about the life history, biology, or behavior of the process of consuming it, in order to scavenge on the th "scraps" (foods which are remains of the host's meal, feces, working in the Indian Ocean studying the behavior or skin). Others will obtain a free ride to a feeding site, det- and ecology of sperm whales off the coast of Sri Lanka, I ach themselves, and predate on small mackerel, herring, or saw for the first time a remora attached to a blue whale.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Biology, Fisheries and Conservation of the Whale Shark
    Journal of Fish Biology (2012) 80,1019–1056 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03252.x, available online at wileyonlinelibrary.com A review of the biology, fisheries and conservation of the whale shark Rhincodon typus D. Rowat*† and K. S. Brooks*‡ *Marine Conservation Society Seychelles, P. O. Box 1299, Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles and ‡Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, U.K. Although the whale shark Rhincodon typus is the largest extant fish, it was not described until 1828 and by 1986 there were only 320 records of this species. Since then, growth in tourism and marine recreation globally has lead to a significant increase in the number of sightings and several areas with annual occurrences have been identified, spurring a surge of research on the species. Simultane- ously, there was a great expansion in targeted R. typus fisheries to supply the Asian restaurant trade, as well as a largely un-quantified by-catch of the species in purse-seine tuna fisheries. Currently R. typus is listed by the IUCN as vulnerable, due mainly to the effects of targeted fishing in two areas. Photo-identification has shown that R. typus form seasonal size and sex segregated feeding aggregations and that a large proportion of fish in these aggregations are philopatric in the broadest sense, tending to return to, or remain near, a particular site. Somewhat conversely, satellite tracking studies have shown that fish from these aggregations can migrate at ocean-basin scales and genetic studies have, to date, found little graphic differentiation globally. Conservation approaches are now informed by observational and environmental studies that have provided insight into the feeding habits of the species and its preferred habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hitchhiking” Behaviour from a Hydrodynamic Point of View Yunxin Xu1, Weichao Shi1*, Abel Arredondo‑Galeana1, Lei Mei2 & Yigit Kemal Demirel1
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Understanding of remora’s “hitchhiking” behaviour from a hydrodynamic point of view Yunxin Xu1, Weichao Shi1*, Abel Arredondo‑Galeana1, Lei Mei2 & Yigit Kemal Demirel1 Symbiotic relationships have developed through natural evolution. For example, that of the remora fsh attached to the body of a shark. From the remora’s perspective, this could be associated to an increased hydrodynamic efciency in swimming and this needs to be investigated. To understand the remora’s swimming strategy in the attachment state, a systematic study has been conducted using the commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software, STAR‑CCM + to analyse and compare the resistance characteristics of the remora in attached swimming conditions. Two fundamental questions are addressed: what is the efect of the developed boundary layer fow and the efect of the adverse pressure gradient on the remora’s hydrodynamic characteristics? According to the results, the resistance of the remora can generally be halved when attached. Besides, the results have also demonstrated that the drag reduction rate increases with the developed boundary layer thickness and can be estimated using the boundary layer thickness ratio and velocity defcit. The paper demonstrates that the most frequent attachment locations are also the areas that provide the maximum drag reduction rate. Natural cooperative relationships have developed throughout the evolution process. Remora fsh (e.g., Echeneis neucratoides, sometimes called “suckerfsh”) are considered to be one of the laziest fsh in the ocean, as they are more likely to be found attached to a host rather than swimming on their own. Tis is shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Remoras on Two Killer Whales (Orcinus Orca) in the Gulf Of
    Aquatic Mammals 2000, 26.2, 148–150 First report of remoras on two killer whales (Orcinus orca)inthe Gulf of California, Mexico Mercedes Guerrero-Ruiz and Jorge Urbán R. Departamento de Biología Marina, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, AP 19-B, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México, 23081 Abstract orca) were found and photographed in the San Jose Channel (24)51*N, 110)35*W). In different parts of the world, there have been One pair had many remoras attached to their many sightings of cetaceans with remoras attached bodies. Both animals were swimming and behaving to their bodies. Recently, two killer whale (Orcinus normally as the other cow-calf pair. The calf orca) cow-calf pairs were sighted travelling together appeared to have more remoras, which were easily in the Gulf of California; one of these pairs had seen on both sides of its back and dorsal fin. In many remoras attached to both cow and calf. contrast, the adult female had most concentrated Despite the pothographs taken, it was not possible near the blowhole and eye patch. She also showed to determine which species of remoras they carried. some greyish marks on the dorsum, from the tip of Usually killer whales are not seen with remoras and the rostrum to the dorsal fin, which might have this is the first published report of a remora-killer been caused by previous remoras’ discs. Both ani- whale association for the Gulf of California. mals had several barnacles, probably Xenobalanus sp., attached mainly on the tip of the dorsal fin Key words: killer whale, remoras, whalesuckers, (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Echeneis Naucrates (Slender Sharksucker)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Echeneis naucrates (Slender Sharksucker) Family: Echeneidae (Remoras) Order: Perciformes (Perch and Allied Fish) Class: Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fish) Fig. 1. Slender sharksucker, Echeneis naucrates. [https://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/discover/species-profiles/echeneis-naucrates/, downloaded 6 March 2017] TRAITS. The slender shark sucker is the most abundant remora species. Its lower jaws extend further than the upper jaw and it is usually a dark brownish-grey or simply dark grey in colour with a darker stripe along the sides. This stripe may be lined by a thin white line. The pectoral fin is generally located high up on the side of the body (Fig. 1). These fish are generally about 100cm in length with a slender body (McGrouther, 2016). Visually differentiating between male and female is difficult, and immature sharksuckers appear very similar to adults after development of their sucking disc (Kowerska, 2002). The oval shaped sucking disc is a highly modified dorsal fin (Fig. 2). This disc has approximately 22 laminae (plates) whose purpose is to allow the fish to attach to its host successfully. DISTRIBUTION. The slender shark sucker is widely distributed throughout the oceans; the Pacific Ocean north to San Francisco, the Indian Ocean, and the western Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 3) (Bester, 2017). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology HABITIAT AND ACTIVITY. Echeneis naucrates can be typically found in warm tropical waters, leisurely swimming in schools inshore and amongst coral reefs. Generally, these fish are found in water depths ranging from 20-50m (Bester, 2017).
    [Show full text]