The Hollow Men”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Function of Poetic Epigraphs in George Eliot's Daniel Deronda
Connotations Vol. 23.2 (2013/2014) The Function of Poetic Epigraphs in George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda* EIKE KRONSHAGE Daniel Deronda was never what one might call a “popular” novel. When F. R. Leavis, in 1946-47, notoriously described it as consisting of two separate halves, he was merely summarizing the critical reception of the book since its publication. By comparing the “magnificent […] achievement [of] the good half” to the “astonishing badness of the bad half” (94), Leavis voiced the common discontent with the book’s lack of unity. He therefore suggested a new title for “the good part of Daniel Deronda,” which he then kept using throughout his essay: “Gwendolen Harleth” (100). The considerable impact of Leavis’s Great Tradition on the further reception of Daniel Deronda can be seen by the humble scholarly interest the novel attracted in the period immediate- ly after the publication of Leavis’s book.1 Leavis’s criticism is at odds with Eliot’s expressed belief in the nov- el’s unity. In 1876 she complained to Barbara Leigh Smith Bodichon about readers who “cut the books to scraps and talk of nothing but Gwendolen,” and added: “I meant everything in the book to be relat- ed to everything else there” (The George Eliot Letters 6: 290). The sharp contrast between the notion of unity on the one hand (Eliot), and the feeling of a split between plot lines on the other (Leavis) has been an issue of critical debate ever since, and an unresolved one, mostly due to the fact that literary critics never agreed on what “unity” in a fic- tional text is supposed to denote. -
Le Guin's "Song" of Inmost Feminism
m $3.00 )( .... FALL 1980 Vol. 21, No. 3 :a 3'i "a Special Ursula K. Le Guin Issue 0 r- ....3'i -0 2 EXTRAPOLATION CHRONICLE ~ r Do you want to know what Robert Sheckley plans to buy as Omni's r new fiction editor? What's happened to Heritage Press? How robots are ..... selling Coca-Cola? What publisher signed Carl Lundgren to work for co co them only? Information about the new Covenant trilogy? Where SF 0 artists are showing their work? The effects of Ballantine and Warner merging their sales forces? Why F&SF is raising their price-and when? Details and covers for upcoming books from Arkham House, DAW, Doubleday, Pocket Books, Del Rey, Dell, etc? Isaac Asimov's publishing problems? Who sold what to whom? The latest SF film and TV deals? What publishers are buying SF stories and novels, and what < they pay-plus details of exactly what editors are looking for? Who's .0 autographing at your favorite SF store? What the critics say about that book before you buy it? You'll find all this-and much more-in just one issue of Science Fiction Chronicle. SFC is a monthly newsmagazine covering the entire spectrum of science fiction . Because it's published in New York, it can keep on top of the field a lot better than any other newspaper on SF. And it's published by Andrew Porter, whose Starship: The Magazine About SF (formerly Algol} has been around since 1963. Every issue of Science Fiction Chronicle features market reports, bookseller news, letters, reviews, convention listings, classifieds, editorials, NASA news, media columns, SFWA reports by jack Williamson and others, new toy, model and game news, and still more. -
Gerard Genette Paratexts Thresholds of Interpretation
Paratexts are those liminal devices and conventions, both within and outside the book, that form part of the complex mediation between book, author, publisher, and reader: titles, forewords, epigraphs, and pub- lishers' jacket copy are part of a book's private and public history. In Paratexts, an English translation of Seuils, Gerard Genette shows how the special pragmatic status of paratextual declarations requires a carefully calibrated analysis of their illocutionary force. With clarity, precision, and an extraordinary range of reference, Paratexts constitutes an encyclo- pedic survey of the customs and institutions of the Republic of Letters as they are revealed in the borderlands of the text. Genette presents a global view of these liminal mediations and the logic of their relation to the reading public by studying each element as a literary function. Richard Macksey's foreword describes how the poetics of paratexts interacts with more general questions of literature as a cultural institution, and situates Genette's work in contemporary literary theory. Literature, Culture, Theory 20 V" V V V V V V V V V V V V %mJ* V V V V V V V V V *J* 4t* •t* 4t* *t* *t* *t* •!* •t* *t* Paratexts: thresholds of interpretation Literature, Culture, Theory 20 «J» «J» «J» <J» «J» «J» *J» «J» VV V V V V V **• V 'I* V V V V V *•* V V V V * I* *** %m*p V V V *•* General editors RICHARD MACKSEY, The Johns Hopkins University and MICHAEL SPRINKER, State University of New York at Stony Brook The Cambridge Literature, Culture, Theory Series is dedicated to theoreti- cal studies in the human sciences that have literature and culture as their object of enquiry. -
The Mythic Method and Intertextuality in T.S. Eliot's Poetry
European Scientific Journal March edition vol. 8, No.6 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 THE MYTHIC METHOD AND INTERTEXTUALITY IN T.S. ELIOT’S POETRY Manjola Nasi, M.A. University of Tirana, Albania Abstract The concept of intertextuality emerges in literary theory several decades after T.S. Eliot had written some of the most influential poems and pieces of criticism of the twentieth century, but the notion is nevertheless applied both theoretically and in practice to Eliot’s work.This paper sheds light on Eliot’s mythic method and its conceptual similarities to intertextuality and related theories, as well as focuses on instances of the application of the former in his poems, depicting the role of this mechanism in the poet’s literary works. Closely related to Eliot’s perception of tradition, it also supports his use of techniques of collage and kaleidoscopic presentation of sources, archetype and images. Keywords: Mythic method, T.S. Eliot, intertextuality, Modernism, allusions, quotations, epigraph, Ulysses, intertextual relations. 1. Eliot and Joyce The year 1922 saw the culmination of Modernism through the publication of some of the greatest Modernist works, two of the most renowned of which were of course James Joyce’s Ulysses and T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land. A year after that, in 1923, Eliot published his review “Ulysses, Order, and Myth”, in which he introduced his “mythic method”: “In manipulating a continuous parallel between contemporaneity and antiquity, Mr. Joyce is pursuing a method which others must pursue after him. They will not be imitators, any more than the scientist who uses the discoveries of an Einstein in pursuing his own, independent, further investigations.