IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT KANNIYAKUMARI AT

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDERS Date : 21.04.2020

Anticipatory Bail

1 Crl.M.P.No.1149 /2020 Inspector of Police Adv. M.Beslin Jegadheese Eraniel P.S. Crime No. 93/2020 2 Crl.M.P.No. 1251/2020 Inspector of Police Adv. R.C. Dinesh Puthukadi P.S. Crime No. 62/2020 3 Crl.M.P.No.1256 /2020 Inspector of Police Adv. N.Perumalpillai Vadasery P.S. Crime No.186 /2018 4 Crl.M.P.No.1267 /2020 Inspector of Police Adv. R. Suresh Vadasery P.S. Crime No.395 /2019 5 Crl.M.P.No.1268/2020 Inspector of Police Adv. P. Micheal Kaliyakkavilai P.S. Crime No. 45//2020 6 Crl.M.P.No.1269 /2020 Inspector of Police Adv. P.Micheal kaliyakkavilai P.S. Crime No.49 /2020 7 Crl.M.P.No.1270 /2020 Inspector of Police Adv. M. Beslin Jegadheese SucindrumP.S. Crime No.85 /2020 8 Crl.M.P.No. 1271/2020 Inspector of Police Adv. T. Sivakumar VellichandaiP.S. Crime No.22 /2020 9 Crl.M.P.No.1273/2020 Inspector of Police Vellichanthai P.S. Crime No22./2020 10 Crl.M.P.No.1275/2020 Inspector of Police CSCID KuzhithuraiP.S. Crime No.156/2019 11 Crl.M.P.No.1277/2020 Inspector of Police P.S. Crime No.68/2020 12 Crl.M.P.No.1297/2020 Inspector of Police P.S. Crime No.71/2020 13 Crl.M.P.No.1299/2020 Inspector of Police Colachel P.S. Crime No.63/2020 14 Crl.M.P.No.1301/2020 Inspector of Police Nesamany NagarP.S. Crime No.34/2020 15 Crl.M.P.No.1304/2020 Inspector of Police ThuckalayP.S. Crime No651./2020 16 Crl.M.P.No.1305/2020 Inspector of Police AnjugramamP.S. Crime No.47/2020 17 Crl.M.P.No.1316/2020 Inspector of Police ManavalakurichiP.S. Crime No27./2019 18 Crl.M.P.No.1321/2020 Inspector of Police P.S. Crime No.104/2020

***** In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1149/2020

Vibin S/o. Gopalan (A1) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Crime No.93/2020 of Eraniel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Beslin Jagadheese, u/s 438

Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 324, 341, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 07.03.2020 at about 9.00 P.M., while the informant was coming near at Vembanoor, the petitioner along with other accused way laid the informant, abused him in filthy language and assaulted him and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and he has been falsely implicated in this case with a view to wreck vengeance. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the present petitioner is A1 and he had damaged a cell phone worth about Rs.15,000/- and injured was discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of , (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020. Crl.M.P. No. 1251/2020

1. Thankaraj, S/o. Chellayyan 2. Sutha, W/o John 3. Kamaladchi, W/o Thankaraj : Petitioners

/Vs./ Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station, Crime No. 62/2020 of Puthukadai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R.C. Dinesh, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners/accused have been charged u/s 294(b), 323, 354 and 506(i)

IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 05.03.2020 at about 3.00 P.M. the petitioners abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened her and intent to outrage her modesty. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioners are innocent and they have been been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners have not committed any offence.

The counter case in Crime No.61/2020 was registered against the defacto complainant and her brother for the offence u/s 447, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i)

IPC. The investigation of the case is almost over. The petitioners are ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the written submission the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioners are A1 to A3 and due to property dispute between the petitioners and the complainant's father, the 1st petitioner had assaulted the defacto complainant and pulled her dress and the petitioners 2 and 3 had used filthy language against him.

Considering the nature of the offence committed by the petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on their appearing before the court concerned the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioners shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent

police daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioners shall also make themselves available before the respondent as

and when required.

4. The petitioners shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation. 5. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai. The Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1256/2020

S.V. Udhayakumar, S/o Subramaniam : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Crime No. 186/2018 of Vadasery Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru N. Perumal Pillay, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 420 IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as a

Revenue Inspector attached to the Nagercoil Municipality. The accused has created some forged documents so as to get tax fixation. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent and he has been been falsely implicated in this case. Due to political enmity, this false case has been registered against the petitioner. The petitioner has not committed any offence. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the defacto complainant is the Revenue Officer of the Nagercoil Corporation. The accused person has created some forged documents so as to get tax fixation. Signatures found in the form and the enclosed documents were found to be different and that has been send for forensic report. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is highly essential and he has serious objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Since the offence related to the documents and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation. 5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal District and Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1267/2020

Jegan, S/o. Michael Raj .. Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Crime No. 395/2019 of Vadasery Police Station. Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru A. Venkatesh, u/s 438 Cr.P.C., praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned public prosecutor

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323, 324,

341, 506(ii) of IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 14.02.2020 at about 11.45 A.M. due to previous enmity, the petitioner used filthy language against the defacto complainant and assaulted him with stick and rod and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and this case has been falsely foisted against the petitioner. The petitioner is no way connected with the offence against him and due to local enmity, his name was implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/­ with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions :­

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/­ S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil The Sub Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1268/2020

Suman S/o. Michael (A1) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Crime No.45/2020 of Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru P. Michael, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 342, 324 and

506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 13.03.2020 at about 9.00 P.M., the petitioner along with other accused used filthy language against the informant and assaulted him with knife and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that the injured was discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR

S.C.W. 5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1269/2020

Meerankani S/o. Mytheenkannu : Petitioner

/Vs./

Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Crime No.49/2020 of Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru P. Michael, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 324, 323 and 506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused used filthy language against the informant and assaulted and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR

S.C.W. 5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1270/2020

Anitha, W/o Arul (A3) : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Suchindrum Police Station, Crime No. 85/2020 of Suchindrum Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Beslin Jagadheese, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 294(b) , 324 and 506(ii) IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 12.03.2020 at about 3.30 P.M. the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against her in the FIR and she is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and she has been falsely implicated in this case. This is the 2nd anticipatory bail petition and the earlier petition in Crl.M.P.No. 1211/2020 was dismissed by this court on 17.03.2020. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on her appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Suchindrum Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1271/2020

1. Klinton @ Raj Klinton S/o. Chellaswamy (A1)

2. Mathan S/o. Ganesan (A2) : Petitioners

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Vellichanthai Police Station, Crime No.22/2020 of Vellichanthai Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T. Sivakumar, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioners have been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323 and

506(i) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 15.03.2020 at about 7.00 P.M., while the informant was in his shop, the petitioners along with other accused came there and used filthy language against the informant and assaulted him and threatened him.

Hence the charge. It is stated in the petition that the petitioners are innocent and they have not involved in any offence so far and the false complaint has been given against the petitioners with a view to wreck vengeance. The petitioners are ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on their appearing before the court concerned the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioners shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioners shall also make themselves available before the respondent as

and when required.

4. The petitioners shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR

S.C.W. 5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellichanthai Police Station. The counsel for the petitioners. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal District and Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1273/2020

N. Rajesh, S/o. Rajarathnam @ Nagarathnam .. Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Vellichanthai Police Station, Crime No. 22/2020 of Vellichanthai Police Station. Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. .. Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru S. Nagarajan, u/s 438 Cr.P.C., praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned public prosecutor

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323 , 506(i) of IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 15.03.2020 at about 07.00 P.M. the petitioner along with two other persons used filthy language against the defacto complainant and assaulted and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him and already there was a vengeance between the defacto complainant and petitioner and due to that, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. No such occurrence was happened alleged in the FIR. The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/­ with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions :­

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/­ S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellichanthai Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020. Crl.M.P. No. 1275/2020

Ramakrishnan, S/o. Allesi : Petitioner

/Vs./ Sub Inspector of Police, CSCID Kuzhithurai @ Nagercoil. Crime No.156/2019 of CSCID Kuzhithurai @ Nagercoil Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T. Sivasankar, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 17 TNK (RT) Order

1973 r/w Section 7(i) a (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The case of prosecution is that on 24.09.2019, while the police party was on vehicle check-up at Pammam Junction, they found that the petitioner illegally transported 210 litres of white kerosene in a Maruthi Omni Car bearing Regn. No.TN

74 P/2238. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him and he is the owner of Maruthi Omni car. The Maruthi car and white kerosene were seized by the police. The white kerosene was distributed only country boats fishermen in and each fisherman was permitted to get 300 litres of white kerosene for his country boat on every month. This is the 3rd anticipatory bail petition and the earlier petitions in Crl.M.P.No. 6153/2019 and

592/2020 were dismissed by this court on 21.12.2019 and 06.02.2020 respectively.

The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the petitioner has involved in illicit transportation of 210 litres of PDS kerosene in the omni car. The earlier anticipatory bail petition was dismissed on 06.02.2020 and there is no change of circumstances. The accused person did not have any valid permit or pass and he has serious objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Since the major portion of the investigation might have been completed at this time, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, CSCID Kuzhithurai @ Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1277/2020

1. Kolappan S/o. Ponnaian (A1)

2. Kamalan S/o. Ponnumuthu (A2) : Petitioners

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Crime No.68/2020 of Marthandam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru G. Balakrishnan, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioners have been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 13.03.2020 at about 8.30 A.M., the petitioners used filthy language against the informant and assaulted the informant with deadly weapon and threatened the life of her. Hence the charge. It is stated in the petition that the petitioners are innocent and nothing has happened likewise what are mentioned in the FIR and they have been falsely implicated in this case and the investigation of the case is almost over. The petitioners are ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the written submission, the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on their appearing before the court concerned the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioners shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioners shall also make themselves available before the respondent as

and when required.

4. The petitioners shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation. 5. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR

S.C.W. 5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai. The Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station. The counsel for the petitioners. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge.

Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No.1297/2020

Seelan @ Briskeelan S/o. Micheal : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station, Crime No.71/2020 of Colachel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Beslin Jagadheese, u/s 438

Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

ORDER

Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public

Prosecutor.

The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 294(b), 324 and

506(ii) of IPC.

The case of prosecution is that on 03.03.2020 at about 5.00 A.M., while the informant was sleeping on his house, the petitioner came there and assaulted the informant by using filthy language against him and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he has not involved in any offences so far and this false case has been foisted against the petitioner with a view to wreck vengeance.

The petitioner is ready to abide by any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR

S.C.W. 5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020. Crl.M.P. No. 1299/2020

1. Sahaya Prathish, S/o. Paniadimai (A1) 2. Ramesh, S/o Vincent (A2) : Petitioners

/Vs./ Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station, Crime No. 63/2020 of Colachel Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru A. Paulraj, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners/accused have been charged u/s 506(i) IPC and 4 of TNPHW

Act.

The case of the prosecution is that on 25.02.2020 at about 1.30 P.M. the petitioners abused in filthy words against the defacto complainant and threatened her.

Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioners are innocent and they have been been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners have not committed any offence.

The investigation of the case is almost over. The petitioners are ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the written submission the learned Public Prosecutor stated that on the eve of ash Wednesday, the petitioners have involved in forcibly applying ash on the face and head of the victim. Such activities of the petitioners are highly condemnable and also there is chance for tampering the witnesses and he has serious objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Considering the nature of the offence committed by the petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with conditions.

In the result, in the event of arrest or on their appearing before the court concerned the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions :-

1. The petitioners shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail.

2. After release, the petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent

police daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioners shall also make themselves available before the respondent as

and when required.

4. The petitioners shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Inspector of Police, Colachel Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1301/2020

Arul Saji, S/o Arul Selvam : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Crime No. 34/2020 of Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R. Murugan, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 294(b) , 323 and 506(ii) IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 15.03.2020 at about 6.00 P.M. the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no injury to the defacto complainant. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1304/2020

Dennykumar, S/o Ayyappan : Petitioner

/Vs./

Inspector of Police, Police Station, Crime No. 651/2019 of Thuckalay Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru T. Johnson, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 294(b) , 323 IPC and Section 4 of

TNPHW Act.

The case of the prosecution is that on 26.12.2019 at about 8.00 A.M. the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injuries. At that time the wife of the informant intervened and she was pushed by the petitioner. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is the own brother of the defacto complainant. Due to property dispute, there is a long standing dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation. 5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram. The Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1305/2020

A. Selvam, S/o Asirvatham : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Crime No. 47/2020 of Anjugramam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru R. Suresh Babu, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 294(b), 332 and 506(i) IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as a salesman in the Tasmac shop and on 05.03.2020 the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent and he is working as a driver in Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and he has been been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has not committed any offence. This is the 2nd anticipatory bail petition and the earlier petition in Crl.M.P.No. 1143/2020 was dismissed by this court on 13.03.2020. The investigation of the case is almost over.

The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the written submission the learned Public Prosecutor stated that the accused person has assaulted the Tasmac shop salesman as and when the complainant refused to sell liquor after closure of Tasmac shop. The petitioner is having two previous cases. Even though the injured has been discharged from the hospital, since the investigation is in the premature stage and he has serious objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Since the learned Public Prosecutor represented that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1316/2020

Chandra Kala @ Kala, W/o Mohanachandran : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Manavalakurichy Police Station, Crime No. 27/2020 of Manavalakurichy Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Beslin Jagadheese, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that on 15.03.2020 at about 5.50 P.M. the petitioner abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against her in the FIR and she is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and she has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on her appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission.

If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. The Sub Inspector of Police, Manavalakurichy Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.

In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Tuesday the 21st day of April, 2020.

Crl.M.P. No. 1321/2020

Suthan, S/o Kumar : Petitioner

/Vs./

Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Crime No. 104/2020 of Thuckalay Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent

This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru C. Dennison, u/s 438 Cr.P.C. praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner/accused has been charged u/s 147, 294(b) , 323, 355 and 506(i)

IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused abused in filthy words, assaulted the defacto complainant, caused injuries and threatened him. Hence the charge.

It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him in the FIR and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner is not found in the FIR. The petitioner is ready to abide any condition and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

It is stated in the written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions.

In the result in the event of arrest or on his appearing before the court concerned the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall appear before the court concerned within 30 days from

today without fail .

2. After release, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police

daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders.

3. The petitioner shall also make himself available before the respondent as and

when required.

4. The petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere

with or put obstacle to the smooth progress of investigation.

5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limit without prior

permission. If there is any violation of condition, the Investigation Officer is with in his discretion to approach the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail even though bail granted by the Sessions Court as per the ruling of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in P.K.Shaji /Vs./ State of Kerala, (2005) AIR S.C.W.

5560.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 21st day of April, 2020.

Sd/-S. Arulmurugan Principal Sessions Judge.

To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram. The Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station. The counsel for the petitioner.