DOCSLIB.ORG

Law on Labor Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law on Labor Relations Pre-Week Guide on Labor Law 2006 Bar Examinations Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan STATEMENT OF COVERAGE This Pre-Week Guide is presented in the form of an outline of basic principles which bar reviewees may use as a quick guide on the significant areas of labor law in the 2006 Bar Examinations. This is presented in three (3) parts. PART ONE covers Books 1 to 4 of the Labor Code and some important social legislations. PART TWO covers Book 5 and PART THREE covers Books 6 and 7 of the Labor Code. LABOR LAWS OF THE PHILIPPINES PART TWO LABOR RELATIONS LAW 1. What is the distinction between “labor relations” and “labor standards”? Labor relations - refers to that part of labor law which regulates the relations between employers and workers. Example: Book V of the Labor Code which deals with labor organizations, collective bargaining, grievance machinery, voluntary arbitration, conciliation and mediation, unfair labor practices, strikes, picketing and lockout. Labor standards - refers to that part of labor law which prescribes the minimum terms and conditions of employment which the employer is required to grant to its employees. Examples: Books One to Four of the Labor Code as well as Book VI thereof which deal with working conditions, wages, hours of work, holiday pay and other benefits, conditions of employment of women, minors, househelpers and homeworkers, medical and dental services, occupational health and safety, termination of employment and retirement. 2. What are the quasi-judicial bodies which exercise jurisdiction over labor cases? A. With Original Jurisdiction: • Labor Arbiters; • National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); • Secretary of Labor and Employment/his duly authorized representatives; • DOLE Regional Directors/duly authorized hearing officers; • Grievance Machinery and Voluntary Arbitrators; • Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR)/Regional Office; • Med-Arbiters; • National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB); and • Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). B. With Appellate Jurisdiction: • National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); • Secretary of Labor and Employment; and • Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations. C. With Special Powers: • Secretary of Labor and Employment; • National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); • National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB); • President of the Philippines; and • Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) / National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC). D. Jurisdiction over social security benefits claims: 1 Pre-Week Guide on Labor Law 2006 Bar Examinations Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan • Social Security System (SSS); • Government Service Insurance System (GSIS); and • Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC). JURISDICTION OF LABOR ARBITERS 3. What is the nature of jurisdiction of Labor Arbiters? The jurisdiction is original and exclusive in nature. Labor Arbiters have no appellate jurisdiction. 4. What are the cases falling under the jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiters? Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over the following cases 1. Unfair labor practice (ULP) cases; 2. Termination disputes (or illegal dismissal cases); 3. Cases that workers may file involving wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment, if accompanied with claim for reinstatement; 4. Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages arising from the employer-employee relations; 5. Cases arising from any violation of Article 264 of this Code, including questions involving the legality of strikes and lockouts; and 6. Except claims for Employees’ Compensation, Social Security, Medicare and maternity benefits, all other claims arising from employer-employee relations, including those of persons in domestic or household service, involving an amount exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) regardless of whether accompanied with a claim for reinstatement. 5. What are the money claims over which Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction? Money claims falling within the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiters may be classified as follows: 1. any money claim, regardless of amount, accompanied with a claim for reinstatement (which involves a termination case); or 2. any money claim, regardless of whether accompanied with a claim for reinstatement, exceeding the amount of P5,000.00 per claimant (which does not necessarily involve termination of employment). 6. What is the effect of receivership or liquidation of business on the jurisdiction of Labor Arbiters? The jurisdiction conferred upon Labor Arbiters and the NLRC would not be lost simply because the assets of a former employer had been placed under receivership or liquidation. 7. What is the effect of rehabilitation receivership on monetary claims of workers? RUBBERWORLD (PHILS.), INC. VS. NLRC, ET AL., (G. R. No. 128003, July 26, 2000) Rehabilitation receivership of a company issued by the SEC has the effect of suspending all proceedings in all judicial or quasi-judicial bodies. The NLRC may not proceed with hearing of monetary claims. If already decided, the monetary awards cannot be executed. To proceed with the labor proceedings is grave abuse of discretion. Only when there is liquidation that the monetary claims may be asserted. (ALEMAR’S SIBAL AND SONS, INC. VS. NLRC, ET AL. G. R. No. 114761, January 19, 2000) – The suspension of the proceedings is necessary to enable the rehabilitation receiver to effectively exercise its powers free from any judicial or extra-judicial interference that might unduly hinder the rescue of the distressed company. Once the receivership proceedings have ceased and the 2 Pre-Week Guide on Labor Law 2006 Bar Examinations Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan receiver/liquidator is given the imprimatur to proceed with corporate liquidation, the SEC order becomes functus officio. Thus, there is no legal impediment for the execution of the decision of the Labor Arbiter for the payment of separation pay by presenting it with the rehabilitation receiver and liquidator, subject to the rules on preference of credits. [See also RUBBERWORLD (PHILS.), INC. VS. NLRC, ET AL., (G. R. No. 126773, April 14, 1999)]. 8. Do Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over wage distortion cases? Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over wage distortion cases only in unorganized establishments. In organized establishments, jurisdiction is vested with Voluntary Arbitrators. 9. Do Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over money claims of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs)? Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over all monetary claims of Overseas Filipino Workers arising from employer-employee relationship or by virtue of any law or contract involving Filipino workers for overseas deployment, including claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages. (NOTE: The POEA continues to have jurisdiction over recruitment or pre-employment cases which are administrative in nature, involving or arising out of recruitment laws, rules and regulations, including money claims arising therefrom or violation of the conditions for issuance of license to recruit workers). 10. How should the monetary claims of OFWs be computed? Skippers Pacific, Inc. vs. Mira, et al., (G. R. No. 144314, November 21, 2002) Under Section 10, Republic Act No. 8042, the claim for unpaid salaries of overseas workers should be whichever is less between salaries for unexpired portion of the contract or 3 months for every year of the remaining unexpired portion of the contract (in case contract is one year or more). 11. Do Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over legality of strikes and lockouts? Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction over the issue of legality of strikes and lockouts, except in strikes and lockouts in industries indispensable to the national interest, in which case, either NLRC (in certified cases) or DOLE Secretary (in assumed cases) has jurisdiction. 12. Do Labor Arbiters have injunction power? It must be noted that the provision in the 1990 version of the NLRC Rules granting injunction power to the Labor Arbiters is no longer found in its 2002 version. It is opined that this deletion is correct since Article 218 of the Labor Code grants injunctive power only to the “Commission” which obviously refers to the NLRC’s various divisions and not to the Labor Arbiter. 13. Do Labor Arbiters have contempt powers? Yes. However, it must be noted that according to the 2003 case of Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Listana, Sr., [G. R. No. 152611, August 5, 2003], quasi-judicial agencies that have the power to cite persons for indirect contempt pursuant to Rule 71 of the Rules of Court can only do so by initiating them in the proper Regional Trial Court. It is not within their jurisdiction and competence to decide the indirect contempt cases. These matters are still within the province of the Regional Trial Courts. 14. Is termination dispute a grievable issue over which Labor Arbiters have no jurisdiction? It has long been settled that a termination dispute (illegal dismissal case) is not a grievable issue, hence, Labor Arbiters have jurisdiction thereover. In Atlas Farms, Inc. vs. NLRC, [G. R. No. 142244, November 18, 2002], the Supreme Court affirmed the earlier rulings to this effect. Not only this. In the same Atlas Farms case, it was categorically ruled that given the 3 Pre-Week Guide on Labor Law 2006 Bar Examinations Prof. Joselito Guianan Chan fact of dismissal, it can be said that the cases were effectively removed from the jurisdiction of the Voluntary Arbitrator, thus placing them within the jurisdiction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Law 2014
    OUTLINE REVIEWER IN POLITICAL LAW 2014 Antonio E.B. Nachura OUTLINE REVIEWER in POLITICAL LAW : by Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura 2014 Philippine Copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved Any copy of this book without the corresponding number and signature of the author on this page either proceeds from an illegitimate source or is in the possession of one who has no authority to dispose of the same. -*V ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA 9225 No. Printed by VJ GRAPHIC ARTS, INC. 2/F PDP Bldg., 1400 Quezon Avenue Quezon City, Metro Manila Philippines TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1. General Principles 1 II. The Philippine Constitution 2 III. The Philippines as a State 31 IV. The Fundamental Powers of the State 47 V. Principles and State Policies 73 VI. Bill of Rights 91 VII. Citizenship 232 VIII. The Legislative Department 251 IX. The Executive Department 281 X. The Judicial Department 309 XI. Constitutional Commissions 325 XII. Local Government 367 XIII. Accountability of Public Officers 367 XIV. National Economy and Patrimony 379 XV. Social Justice and Human Rights 392 XVI. Education, Science and Technology Arts, Culture and Sports 396 XVII. The Family 403 XVIII. General Provisions 403 XIX. Transitory Provisions 405 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW i. General Principles 413 II. Powers of Administrative Bodies 415 in. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 429 IV. Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions 438 LAW OFPUBLIC OFFICERS i. General Principles 445 II. Eligibility and Qualifications 447 in. De Facto Officers 451 IV. Commencement of Official Relations 454 V. Powers and Duties of Public Officers 471 VI. Liability o Public Officers 476 VII.
    [Show full text]
  • G.R. No. L-10405 December 29, 1960 WENCESLAO PASCUAL, in His
    G.R. No. L-10405 December 29, 1960 WENCESLAO PASCUAL, in his official capacity as Provincial Governor of Rizal, petitioner-appellant, vs. THE SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL., respondents-appellees. Asst. Fiscal Noli M. Cortes and Jose P. Santos for appellant. Office of the Asst. Solicitor General Jose G. Bautista and Solicitor A. A. Torres for appellee. CONCEPCION, J.: Appeal, by petitioner Wenceslao Pascual, from a decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, dismissing the above entitled case and dissolving the writ of preliminary injunction therein issued, without costs. On August 31, 1954, petitioner Wenceslao Pascual, as Provincial Governor of Rizal, instituted this action for declaratory relief, with injunction, upon the ground that Republic Act No. 920, entitled "An Act Appropriating Funds for Public Works", approved on June 20, 1953, contained, in section 1-C (a) thereof, an item (43[h]) of P85,000.00 "for the construction, reconstruction, repair, extension and improvement" of Pasig feeder road terminals (Gen. Roxas — Gen. Araneta — Gen. Lucban — Gen. Capinpin — Gen. Segundo — Gen. Delgado — Gen. Malvar — Gen. Lim)"; that, at the time of the passage and approval of said Act, the aforementioned feeder roads were "nothing but projected and planned subdivision roads, not yet constructed, . within the Antonio Subdivision . situated at . Pasig, Rizal" (according to the tracings attached to the petition as Annexes A and B, near Shaw Boulevard, not far away from the intersection between the latter and Highway 54), which projected feeder roads "do not connect any government property or any important premises to the main highway"; that the aforementioned Antonio Subdivision (as well as the lands on which said feeder roads were to be construed) were private properties of respondent Jose C.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine International Law Cases
    Remedial Law; Motion to Dismiss; Appeal; An order denying a motion to dismiss is recognized the exclusive dominion and sovereign jurisdiction of the Holy See over the not reviewable by the appellate courts except when it is clear in the records that the Vatican City. It also recognized the right of the Holy See to receive foreign diplomats, trial court has no alternative but to dismiss the complaint.—A preliminary matter to to send its own diplomats to foreign countries, and to enter into treaties according to be threshed out is the procedural issue of whether the petition for certiorari under International Law (Garcia, Questions and Problems In International Law, Public and Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court can be availed of to question the order denying Private 81 [1948]). petitioner’s motion to dismiss. The general rule is that an order denying a motion to dismiss is not reviewable by the appellate courts, the remedy of the movant being to Same; Same; Same; Same; The Lateran Treaty established the statehood of the file his answer and to proceed with the hearing before the trial court. But the general Vatican City.—The Lateran Treaty established the statehood of the Vatican City “for rule admits of exceptions, and one of these is when it is very clear in the records that the purpose of assuring to the Holy See absolute and visible independence and of the trial court has no alternative but to dismiss the complaint (Philippine National guaranteeing to it indisputable sovereignty also in the field of international relations” Bank v.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Military Bases in the Philippines: Their Trs Ategic Importance and Options for Relocation William D
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Theses and Major Papers Marine Affairs 6-25-1987 United States Military Bases in the Philippines: Their trS ategic Importance and Options for Relocation William D. Barker University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ma_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Barker, William D., "United States Military Bases in the Philippines: Their trS ategic Importance and Options for Relocation" (1987). Theses and Major Papers. Paper 355. This Major Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Marine Affairs at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Major Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNITED STATES HILITARY BASES IN THE PHILIPPINES The:l.r Strategic Importance and Options for Relocation \Vill:Lam D. Barker Y~jor Paper Marine Affairs Seminar 25 june 1987 Approved by: --------- .---- ---- Date: Br uce E. Marti Profes sor , Mari ne Af f airs Depart ment Un i versi ty of Rhode I s l and Hajor Pa per Advjsor 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHf.PTER PAGE ONE - INTRODUCTION . 1. TWO - THE PHILIPP I NE EAS ES 5. t: A History of the Base Agreements . J. Capabilities and Facilities of the Bases 9. Strat egic Importance of t he Bases 13. THREE- SOUTHEAST ASIA 19. Association of Southeastern Asian Nations 19. Southeast Asian Communist TI1 reat 21. FOUR - OPTIONS FOR RELOCATI ON 25. OPTION 1 • .
    [Show full text]
  • Clark Green City), BCDA’S Most Ambitious Project to Date, Is Designed to Be the Country’S Frst Smart, Green, Disaster-Resilient City
    The vision of a modern Philippines CLARK— 7 36 44 54 58 Belt of The Golden Work-live- A city that Resilient progress Age of play-learn breathes Growth THE VISION OF A MODERN PHILIPPINES BCDA’s projects strategic Venues where New Clark City’s Developers of New from North to South partnership nature, cultures, masterplan calls for Clark City aren’t just feature a varied mix and businesses an unprecedented taking a long- and Commitments of infrastructure and harmoniously 60 percent of land as 360-degree view of from the Japanese land development complement open space resiliency—they’re government will help each other make making it into a reality realize the dream of for dynamic and Build, Build, Build progressive societies Editorial Regina Abuyuan Nieve Aquino Cecile Jusi-Baltasar Patricia Ruth B. Cailao Boo Chanco Alya B. Honasan Tricia V. Morente Julia Nebrija Royal Pineda Eng Kiat-Tan Florian Saint-Vincent Sylvester Wong Josephine Gotianun-Yap Art Josh Argosino Terese Cimafranca Renders by BCDA, AECOM, and BUDJI+ROYAL Architecture+Design (where indicated) Photographs by BCDA, BUDJI+ROYAL, and Filinvest Corporation (where indicated) ________________ Clark-Te Vision of a Modern Philippines Copyright © 2017 Bases Conversion and Development Authority All rights reserved. Tis book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. Printed in the Philippines. Sixth printing, 2018 BCDA Corporate Center 2nd Floor, Bonifacio Technology Center 31st Street corner 2nd Avenue Bonifacio Global City, Taguig Metro Manila 1634 Philippines www.bcda.gov.ph 26 An artist’s vision of New Clark City—a well-planned and well-managed city, a place long deserved by Filipinos.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Agreement So the Public May Know
    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT SO THE PUBLIC MAY KNOW: This MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is executed by and between: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB), a Philippine government agency created under Republic Act No. 8749 or the 1999 Clean Air Act, holding office at the EMB Building, DENR Compound, Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, represented here by its Director, Assistant Secretary, ATTY. JUAN MIGUEL T. CUNA, as confirmed by the attached authority, -and- JOHN HAY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (JHMC), an unchartered Philippine government owned and controlled corporation, holding office at the John Hay Special Economic Zone, Loakan Road, Baguio City, and represented here by its President and CEO, JAMIE ELOISE M. AGBAYANI, M.D., as confirmed by the attached authority. ANTECEDENTS: Under Executive Order 192 dated 10 June 1987, the DENR is mandated to be the primary government agency responsible for the conservation, management, development and proper use of the country's environment and natural resources, specifically forest and grazing lands, minerals resources, including those in the reservation and watershed areas, as well as the licensing and regulation of all natural resources in order to ensure equitable sharing of the benefits derived there from for the welfare of the present and future generations of Filipinos. The EMB is primarily tasked to implement rules on the provision, control and abatement of all kinds of air pollution in the entire country pursuant to Republic Act 8749. The EMB as part of its mandate and authority shall coordinate with the private sector, non-government organization, civil society organization, the local government units, and other government agencies and bureaus, for the dissemination of information related to air quality management in the entire country.
    [Show full text]
  • Versus- GR No. 76607
    SUPREME COURT EN BANC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FREDERICK M. SMOUSE AND YVONNE REEVES, Petitioners, -versus- G.R. No. 76607 February 26, 1990 HON. ELIODORO B. GUINTO, Presiding Judge, Branch LVII, Regional Trial Court, Angeles City, ROBERTO T. VALENCIA, EMERENCIANA C. TANGLAO, AND PABLO C. DEL PILAR, Respondents. x---------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANTHONY LAMACHIA, T/SGT. USAF, WILFREDO BELSA, PETER ORASCION AND ROSE CARTALLA, Petitioners, -versus- G.R. No. 79470 February 26, 1990 HON. RODOLFO D. RODRIGO, as Presiding Judge of Branch 7, Regional Trial Court (BAGUIO CITY), La Trinidad, Benguet and FABIAN GENOVE, Respondents. x---------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOMI J. KINGI, DARREL D. DYE and STEVEN F. BOSTICK, Petitioners, -versus- G.R. No. 80018 February 26, 1990 HON. JOSEFINA D. CEBALLOS, As Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Branch 66, Capas, Tarlac, and LUIS BAUTISTA, Respondents. x----------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MAJOR GENERAL MICHAEL P. C. CARNS, AIC ERNEST E. RIVENBURGH, AIC ROBIN BLEVINS, SGT. NOEL A. GONZALES, SGT. THOMAS MITCHELL, SGT. WAYNE L. BENJAMIN, ET AL., Petitioners, -versus- G.R. No. 80258 February 26, 1990 HON. CONCEPCION S. ALARCON VERGARA, as Presiding Judge, Branch 62 REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, Angeles City, and RICKY SANCHEZ, FREDDIE SANCHEZ AKA FREDDIE RIVERA, EDWIN MARIANO, AKA JESSIE DOLORES SANGALANG, ET AL., Respondents. x----------------------------------------------------x D E C I S I O N CRUZ, J.: These cases have been consolidated because they all involve the doctrine of state immunity. The United States of America was not impleaded in the complaints below but has moved to dismiss on the ground that they are in effect suits against it to which it has not consented.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Notes.Xlsx
    Index to Digitized Heritage Reels My 1936 Jaunt Around the World Filmed by Samuel George Turrell (1880‐1940) for his AusIMM branch talks Location Index Page 1 Location Film Number Antamok Mine 27 784 Argonaut Mine 23 779 Baguio 27 784 28 785 37 791 Balatoc Mine 27 784 Barisan mine 20 776 Benguet Mine 35 789 27 784 Big Bell Mine 32 786c Bird in Hand mine 24 781 Blue Bird Mine 33 787 Broken Hill 22 778 24 781 39 792a Burma 23 779 38 792 California 23 779 Canada 25 782 32 786c Captains Flat 39 792a Central Norseman 33 787 Cobar 24 781 Emperor Mine 32 786c Fiji 32 786c Gold River Mine 27 784 Grass Valley Mine 23 779 Hong Kong 38 792 Ipo Mine 28 785 Itogon Mine 28 785 IXL Mining Company 38 792 Kalgoorlie 21 777 39 792a Kirkland Lake 25 782 32 786c Korea 23 779 Loloma Mine 32 786c London 22 778 Malaya 20 776 Location Index Page 2 Location Film Number Manila 28 785 37 791 Masbate 36 790 McIntyre‐Porcupine 32 786c Melbourne 30 786a Moun Farrell Mine 24 781 Mount Isa 34 788 38 792 39 792a 26 783 30 786a Mount Morgan 34 788 Mt Lyell 22 778 24 781 Namtu Mine 23 779 New York 25 782 31 786b 32 786c Norseman 33 787 Oriental Consolidated mine 23 779 Pagaran Sia Joe mine 20 776 Philippines 35 789 36 790 38 792 20 776 27 784 28 785 Port Kembla 22 778 Port Pirie 22 778 Rabaul 38 792 Raub Australia Gold Mine 38 792 20 776 Rosebery 24 781 San Mauricio Mill 35 789 Singapore 20 776 Suyoc Consolidated 36 790 Sydney 21 777 26 783 30 786a Tasmania 22 778 24 781 Tavua Fiji 32 786c Timmins 25 782 Townsville 26 783 United Paracale Mine 36 790 Western Australia 21 777 Whyalla 22 778 Widgiemooltha 33 787 Wiluna 39 792a Yellowdine 21 777 Youanmi Mine 32 786c Film 20 Faded colour.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980), and Tricholeptomyia Raehisoura, Ravenazities
    Mosquito Systematics Vol. 17(l) 1985 A List of Philippine Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) 1 2 1 Adela Cagampang-Ramos , Robert 3. McKenna , and Dennis D. Pinkovsky ABSTRACT. An updated list of the mosquitoes recorded from the Republic of the Philippines is provided. The list contains 279 species, subspecies, and varieties. Geographic distributions and pertinent references are incorporated within the taxonomic listing. The number of Philippine mosquitoes recorded in the literature has increased from the two species noted by Osten-Sacken (1882) to the 279 species, subspecies, and varieties listed here. The Philippine Culicidae were last reviewed by Basio (1971, 1974). Basio's works are not well known because they were published in journals with a limited distribution. Since Basio's publications, there have been significant publications in culicid taxonomy which have affected the fauna1 list of the Philippines: Abercrombie (1977); Harrison and Scanlon (1974, 1975); Huang (1978b, 1979); Knight (1978); Knight and Stone (1977); Mattingly (1980); Miyagi (1980); Miyagi, Toma and Tsukamoto (1983); Miyagi, Toma and Rivera (1983); Peyton (1977); Ramalingam (1974); Reinert (1970, 1974, 1976a, 1976b, 1981, 1982); and Sirivanakarn (1972, 1976, 1977a). Our list includes these changes, reflecting 35 specific or subspecific additions of which 15 are new descriptions, 7 are new records, and 17 are resurrections from synonymy. Supraspecific additions are the genus M+w@~ (Mattingly 1971) and the subgenera BeZkinius (Reinert 1982), Inpwmia (White 1974), Rachionotomyia (Mattingly 1980), and Tricholeptomyia (Mattingly 1980). Forty species have been reassigned to these new taxa. Thirteen species and the subgenera Raehisoura, RavenaZities, and Skusea listed by Basio have been deleted.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Newsletter of Rotary Club of Manila 0 No. 3733, March 1, 2018
    1 Official Newsletter of Rotary Club of Manila 0 balita No. 3733, March 1, 2018 THE ROTARY CLUB OF MANILA BOARD OF DIRECTORS and Executive Officers 2017-2018 JIMMIE POLICARPIO President TEDDY OCAMPO Immediate Past President CHITO ZALDARRIAGA Vice President BOBBY JOSEPH ISSAM ELDEBS LANCE MASTERS CALOY REYES SUSING PINEDA ART LOPEZ Directors ALVIN LACAMBACAL Secretary NICKY VILLASEÑOR Treasurer DAVE REYNOLDS Sergeant-At-Arms AMADING VALDEZ Board Legal Adviser RENE POLICARPIO What’s Inside Assistant Secretary Program 2 Presidential Timeline 3-4 NER LONZAGA Guest Speaker Profile 5 JIM CHUA Preview of Next Thursday Meeting 6 The Week that Was 7-10 Assistant Treasurer RCM Weekly Birthday Celebrants/Board Meeting 11 Centennial Committee 12 BOLLIE BOLTON Sunshine Committee 13-14 International Service 15-18 Deputy Sgt-at-Arms The Rotary Foundation 19 Interclub Activities 20-25 Secretariat Centennial 26-27 Speaker’s Bureau// Cogs in the Wheel 28-29 ANNA KUN TOLEDO News Release/ Obituary 30-33 Executive Secretary Public Health Nutrition and Child Care 34 Advertisement 35-37 2 PROGRAM RCM’S 31st for Rotary Year 2017-2018 March 1, 2018, Thursday, 12Noon, New World Makati Hotel Glasshouse Officer-In-Charge/ Program Moderator : Rtn. “Ray” Rysbergen P R O G R A M TIMETABLE 11:30 AM Registration & Cocktails (WINES courtesy of RCM Dir.-elect/Dir. “Bobby” Joseph) 12:25 PM Bell to be Rung: Members and Guests are requested to be seated by OIC/Moderator : Rtn. “Ray” Rysbergen 12:30 PM Call to Order VP “Chito” Zaldarriaga Presiding Officer Singing of the Republic of the Philippines National Anthem RCM WF Music Chorale Invocation Star Rtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Base Rights Agreements with Spain, the Philippines And
    Center for Conflict Analysis and Resolution Occasional Paper 2 Negotiating Military Base-Rights with Spain, The Philippines, and Greece: Lessons Learned by Daniel Druckman, Ph.D. National Research Council 01990, Center for Conflict Analysis and Resolution Con tents About the Author ..................................................iv About the Center .................................................. v Foreword .........................................................vi The Case Studies ..................................................1 Overview ........................................................1 U.S. Bases in Spain ............................................. 1 U.S. Bases in the Philippines ......................................2 U.S. Bases in Greece ............................................3 Symposia Participants .............................................4 Themes .........................................................4 Contextual Factors .................................................6 Legacy of Earlier Agreements .......................................6 Structural and Cultural Asymmetries ................................. 8 External Influences ..............................................10 Negotiation Processes ..............................................13 Team Composition ...............................................14 Comparable Delegations .........................................14 Coordination ..................................................14 Chief Negotiator ...............................................15
    [Show full text]