DOCSLIB.ORG

MFS® Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MFS® Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund Q2 | 2021 ® As of June 30, 2021 MFS Tennessee Municipal Fact Sheet Bond Fund Objective The fund seeks to provide double tax-free income (income that is exempt from federal and the Tennessee Seeks total return with an emphasis on Hall Income Tax) for in-state residents. Management seeks to drive performance through sector/security income exempt from federal income tax selection and quantitative analysis of the yield curve. and the Tennessee Hall Income Tax, if any, but also considering capital appreciation. Industries (%) Credit quality‡ Investment team (% of total net assets) Cash & Cash Equivalents Health/Hospi- AAA 4.2 Portfolio Manager (1.4) Michael Dawson tals (16.7) AA 35.2 Tax/Sale (3.1) 22 years with MFS A 29.9 32 years in industry Misc Rev/Other (3.8) Other BBB 18.7 Fund benchmark State & Local Approp (5.1) Industries (16.0) BB 1.7 Bloomberg Barclays Municipal CCC and Below 4.6 Bond Index Single Family Hsg/State Other Not Rated 4.2 Risk measures vs. benchmark (6.8) (Class I) General Municipal-Owned Utilities Alpha -0.33 Obligation/- (6.8) Beta 1.00 General Sharpe Ratio 0.44 Airport (7.6) Purpose (12.8) Standard Deviation 4.08 Universities/Colleges Water/Sewer Risk measures are based on a trailing 5 (8.2) (11.6) year period. Fund Symbol and CUSIP I MTNLX 55273N293 Growth of $10,000 Class I shares 04/01/16 – 06/30/21 R6 MPONX 55273N137 $10,000 Class I ending value $11,821 A MSTNX 55273N855 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 ‡ For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are $0 assigned to underlying securities utilizing 04/01/16 06/30/21 ratings from Moody's, Fitch, and Standard Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Fund returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions. & Poor's rating agencies and applying the Class I shares are available without a sales charge to eligible investors. following hierarchy: If all three agencies Average annual total returns (%) provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) Inception Date 10 Year 5 Year 3 Year 1 Year is assigned; if two of the three agencies Class I 04/01/16 3.87 2.89 4.51 5.95 rate a security, the lower of the two is Class R6 08/01/17 3.90 2.96 4.62 6.14 assigned. If none of the 3 Rating Agencies Class A without sales charge 08/12/88 3.61 2.64 4.26 5.67 above assign a rating, but the security is Class A with 4.25% maximum sales charge 08/12/88 3.16 1.76 2.76 1.17 rated by DBRS Morningstar, then the DBRS Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index N/A 4.28 3.25 5.10 4.17 Morningstar rating is assigned. If none of the 4 ratings agencies listed above rate Performance data shown represent past performance and are no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal the security, but the security is rated by value fluctuate so your shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than the original cost; current performance may be lower or the Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA), then higher than quoted. For most recent month-end performance, please visit mfs.com. the KBRA rating is assigned. Ratings are Performance results reflect any applicable expense subsidies and waivers in effect during the periods shown. Without such subsidies shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., and waivers the fund's performance results would be less favorable. All results assume the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. AAA). All ratings are subject to change. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. U.S. Government includes securities Performance for Class I shares includes the performance of the fund's Class A shares, adjusted to take into account differences in sales issued by the U.S. Department of the loads and class-specific operating expenses (such as 12b-1 fees), if any, for periods prior to their offering. Please see the prospectus for Treasury. Federal Agencies includes rated additional information about performance and expenses. and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income Performance for Class R shares includes the performance of the fund's Class A shares, adjusted to take into account differences in sales securities, U.S. Agency MBS, and CMOs loads and class-specific operating expenses (such as Rule 12b-1 fees), if any, for periods prior to their offering. Please see the prospectus of U.S. Agency MBS. Other Not Rated for additional information about performance and expenses. includes fixed income securities which have not been rated by any rating agency. Class R6 shares are available without a sales charge to eligible investors. The portfolio itself has not been rated by any rating agency. NOT FDIC INSURED - MAY LOSE VALUE - NO BANK GUARANTEE Please see reverse for additional information. Fact Sheet | Q2 | 2021 MFS® Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund Glossary CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS (%) Alpha is a measure of the portfolio's risk- '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20 adjusted performance. When compared to the portfolio's beta, a positive alpha indicates Class I 10.37 8.24 -6.13 9.89 2.89 0.62 4.20 1.08 7.14 3.64 better-than-expected portfolio performance Bloomberg Barclays 10.70 6.78 -2.55 9.05 3.30 0.25 5.45 1.28 7.54 5.21 and a negative indicates alpha worse-than- Municipal Bond Index expected portfolio performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Beta is a measure of the volatility of a portfolio relative to the overall market. A beta less than A small portion of income may be subject to state, federal, and/or alternative minimum tax. Capital gains, if any, are subject to a capital 1.0 indicates lower risk than the market; a beta gains tax. greater than 1.0 indicates higher risk than the market. It is most reliable as a risk measure FUND EXPENSES (%) FUND DATA when the return fluctuations of the portfolio are Class I Class R6 Class A Inception Date 08/12/88 highly correlated with the return fluctuations of Gross Expense Ratio 0.73 0.65 0.98 Net Assets $101.0 million the index chosen to represent the market. Net Expense Ratio 0.61 0.54 0.86 Number of Issues 202 Sharpe Ratio is a risk-adjusted measure Turnover Ratio 21% calculated to determine reward per unit of risk. Gross Expense Ratio is the fund's total operating expense ratio It uses a standard deviation and excess return. from the fund's most recent prospectus. Net Expense Ratio Avg. Eff. Maturity 15.0 years The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better the reflects the reduction of expenses from contractual fee waivers Avg. Eff. Duration 5.9 years portfolio's historical risk-adjusted performance. and reimbursements. Elimination of these reductions will result Standard Deviation is an indicator of the in higher expenses and lower performance. These reductions will TOP 5 HOLDINGS portfolio's total return volatility, which is based Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County TN on a minimum of 36 monthly returns. The larger continue until at least July 31, 2021. Water & Sewer Revenue 5.000 JUL 01 32 the portfolio's standard deviation, the greater DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE (%) the portfolio's volatility. Metro Gov Nash & Dav County Health & Edu Facs Bd TN Ref- HISTORY (CLASS I) Bonds 98.6 Turnover Ratio is the percentage of a Trevecca Nazarene Universi 5.000 OCT 01 48 Income Paid Monthly Cash & Cash portfolio's securities that have changed over 1.4 Shelby County Health Edu & Housing Facilities Brd TN the course of a year: (lesser of purchases or June $0.01927 Equivalents Methodist Le Bonheur Hlthcare- 5.000 MAY 01 35 sales)/average market value. May $0.02023 City of Memphis TN Storm Water System Revenue TN 5.000 Average Effective Maturity is a weighted April $0.01959 OCT 01 39 average of maturity of the bonds held in a portfolio, taking into account any prepayments, March $0.02014 Met Nashville & Davidson Cnty Health & Educ Facs Bd TN puts, and adjustable coupons which may Vanderbilt Univ Med Ctr-Ser A 4.000 JUL 01 47 shorten the maturity. Longer-maturity funds 9.6% of total net assets are generally considered more interest-rate sensitive than shorter maturity funds. Important risk considerations Average Effective Duration is a measure of The fund may not achieve its objective and/or you could lose money on your investment in the fund. n Bond: Investments in debt how much a bond's price is likely to fluctuate instruments may decline in value as the result of, or perception of, declines in the credit quality of the issuer, borrower, counterparty, with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if or other entity responsible for payment, underlying collateral, or changes in economic, political, issuer-specific, or other conditions. rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration Certain types of debt instruments can be more sensitive to these factors and therefore more volatile. In addition, debt instruments entail is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value. interest rate risk (as interest rates rise, prices usually fall). Therefore, the portfolio's value may decline during rising rates. Portfolios that consist of debt instruments with longer durations are generally more sensitive to a rise in interest rates than those with shorter durations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HALL INCOME TAX the Largest Revenue Stream for the City of Oak Hill Is the Hall Income Tax
    Pride in our community • Affection for our history • Service to our neighbors Fall 2 017 www.oakhilltn.us NEWS HALL INCOME TAX The largest revenue stream for the City of Oak Hill is the Hall Income Tax. This is a tax required by the State of Tennessee and paid (if required individually) on your annual State of Tennessee Income Tax Return. INSIDE The amount paid to the State is divided between the State and the local community. In order • Bulk Building for the local community to receive their share, a resident must include Oak Hill in the City box on the Regulations return. Recently, the State of Tennessee created a plan to eliminate this tax over the next 5 years or • Budget Report so. The initial rate was 6%, last year the rate fell to 5%. Each year the rate will fall by 1% until the tax is eliminated. This of course means that in future years, the City of Oak Hill will be losing a significant amount of its’ annual revenue. At the 6% rate, the city would receive around $450,000, • Garbage/Recycle with the change to 5%, the city received $350,000. It is estimated that at 4%, the city will receive Service about $270,000. This will continue to decline until it is eliminated. Most recently due to this change, the Board of Commissioners discussed possibilities to offset this significant loss in revenue. One of the more popular ideas is to pass on the cost for garbage/ The mission of the recycling services. This service currently costs the city about $375,000 per year.
    [Show full text]
  • June 4 & 5, 2018
    AGENDA BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN WORK SESSION Monday, June 4, 2018, 4:30 p.m. City Hall, 225 W. Center St., Council Room, 2nd Floor Board of Mayor and Aldermen Mayor John Clark, Presiding Vice Mayor Mike McIntire Alderman Betsy Cooper Alderman Jennifer Adler Alderman Colette George Alderman Joe Begley Alderman Tommy Olterman Leadership Team Jeff Fleming, City Manager Chris McCartt, Assistant City Manager for Administration Scott Boyd, Fire Chief Ryan McReynolds, Assistant City Manager for Operations Lynn Tully, Development Services Director J. Michael Billingsley, City Attorney George DeCroes, Human Resources Director Jim Demming, City Recorder/Chief Financial Officer Heather Cook, Marketing and Public Relations Director David Quillin, Police Chief 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. KEDB / NETWORKS Update – Bill Dudney & Clay Walker 4. 3rd Quarterly Financials – Jeff Fleming 5. Review of Items on June 5, 2018 Business Meeting Agenda 6. Adjourn Next Work Session, June 18: Downtown Master Plan, Kingsport Ballet & Neighborhood Commission Citizens wishing to comment on agenda items please come to the podium and state your name and address. Please limit your comments to five minutes. Thank you. Memorandum To: Jeff Fleming, City Manager From: Judy Smith, Budget Director Date: 5/25/2018 Re: FY18 Third Quarter Report I have enclosed the FY18 Third Quarter Reports for your review. They include summaries of the major funds: General Fund, Water and Sewer Funds. The expenses as of March 31 are at 75% for the General Fund, 66% for Water and 68% for Sewer which is on target for this time of year. Most of the revenue in the General Fund is on target for this time of year.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Hall Tax to Be Phased out by Brandy Bradley
    Volume XXII No. 3 Fall 2016 Blackburn, Childers & Steagall, PLC Quarterly Newsletter Tennessee Hall Tax to Be Phased Out By Brandy Bradley On May 20, 2016, Governor Bill Haslam signed a bill that collected fl ows directly out to the towns, cities, and counties will eventually eliminate the Tennessee Hall income tax. Th e where the taxpayers live. current Hall income tax rate is 6% and applies to certain How does this aff ect you? Th e Institute on Taxation and Eco- types of interest income, certain types of dividend income, nomic Policy estimates that, when the tax is eliminated, the and capital gains distributions in excess of $1,250 (single) top 1% of Tennesseans in terms of income will save around and $2,500 (married fi ling jointly). Th e new piece of legisla- $5,000 each year. Th e majority of Hall taxpayers will only tion intends to cut the Hall tax from 6% to 5% for 2016 tax save around $50 each year. Whether you are in the top 1% or returns due in April 2017 and will continue to reduce the tax not, if you pay Hall taxes, this reduction will provide a benefi t by 1% each following year. Whether the annual reductions to you starting with your 2016 state tax return. occur or not, the tax will be completely eliminated beginning in tax year 2022. Over 1,000 BCS clients paid TN According to the Tax Foundation, Tennessee currently has Hall Tax in 2015. Average the highest combined average state and local sales taxes in the projected savings per client is country.
    [Show full text]
  • General Fund Summary
    GENERAL FUND SUMMARY FY 2020 ADOPTED BUDGET 61 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY Sources and Uses of Funds Where the Money Comes From…. Property Taxes, 65.5% Other Local Taxes, 8.2% State Revenue, 5.8% Federal Revenue, Operating 2.0% Transfers In, 0.2% Charges for Services, 0.7% All Other Planned Use of Fines, Fees & Sources, 1.1% Fund Balance, 1.2% Permits, 15.3% SOURCES OF FUNDS: FY20 Adopted FY19 Amended Revenue: Property Taxes $ 288,746,885 $ 295,445,000 Fines, Fees & Permits 67,448,000 68,400,853 Other Local Taxes 36,308,399 34,475,000 Intergovernmental-State 25,527,804 24,180,762 Intergovernmental-Federal 8,970,869 6,986,833 Charges for Services 2,948,307 3,186,676 Other Revenue/Interest Income 4,942,690 2,257,000 Subtotal 434,892,955 434,932,124 Other Sources: Planned Use of Fund Balance 6,290,393 8,549,645 Operating Transfers In 1,028,392 1,449,824 Other Financial Sources 100,000 200,000 Subtotal 7,418,785 10,199,469 Total Appropriation Sources $ 442,311,740 $ 445,131,593 62 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY Sources and Uses of Funds …..and Where the Money Goes Personnel 69.3% Operating and Operating Maintenance Transfers Out 5.6% Affiliated 16.7% Organizations & Grants 8.4% USE OF FUNDS: FY20 Adopted FY19 Amended Personnel $ 306,666,160 $ 308,696,762 Operating and Maintenance * 73,851,705 77,221,514 Affiliated Organizations & Grants 37,202,257 40,969,230 Operating Transfers Out 24,591,618 18,244,087 Total Appropriation Uses $ 442,311,740 $ 445,131,593 * Includes any spending contingencies, restrictions or cost savings from other sources Personnel expenses
    [Show full text]
  • Our State, Our Future
    HOWOur TENNESSEE’S State, INCOME TAX SECRE T OurHARMS RETIREES Future AND ENTREPRENEURS By Lindsay Boyd Retiring to Tennessee Jon and Linda Freeman are in their early 70s and have been married for over thirty years. Not long after meeting through their work at Boeing in Colorado, the young couple relocated to Alabama in 1965 with dreams of starting a family. Jon began planning for their retirement early, and Linda even enrolled in a “women in investing” course during a time when women were rarely active in this role. Both were dually committed to building a sound future for themselves and their children. After Jon spent the better part of his career in the scientific field and Linda in the medical profession, they decided to retire in 2007 so they could spend more time with loved ones and finally enJoy a mountain home in their favorite alcove of Coldwater, nestled in the Tennessee hills. The couple began buying land in Coldwater during the 1990s, anticipating a welcoming rural retreat. “It’s beautiful. We love the outdoors,” reflects Linda. “Huntsville (Alabama) was getting too big, with too much traffic. We wanted to get back to land, yet stay close enough to Huntsville to still go to church there and see friends. But this is home now.” Yet, as much as Jon and Linda have embraced and relished their sunset years in Tennessee, they were met with a surprising and alarming tax that’s been a harsh reality for Tennessee’s retirees: the Hall Income Tax, enacted in 1929. 2 Our State, Our Future What is the Hall Income Tax? And if Tennessee is substantial lobbying interests—cities and counties truly a state that reJects income taxes, why have across the state—in preserving the tax.
    [Show full text]
  • James M. Mccarten
    James M. McCarten Counsel | Atlanta, GA , Atlanta, GA Nashville, TN T: GA: (404) 532-7236 [email protected] Legal Secretary Diane Steiger (404) 685-4265 [email protected] Services Business & Succession Planning, Tax Law, Trusts & Estates Planning, Corporate, Executive Compensation, Jim serves as Counsel in the firm's Tax, Trusts and Estates and Corporate practice groups, where his practice is best described as a general tax practice. Jim works with a broad spectrum of clients, including start-up businesses, mid-market family businesses, publicly traded entities, retired corporate executives and business owners looking to transfer or sell their business. His practice encompasses the entire range of tax planning, including, mergers and acquisitions, structuring and forming start-up businesses, asset protection, family business planning and estates, trusts and wealth preservation. In addition to his transactional and tax planning practices, Jim is active in representing clients during audits by or in litigation with the IRS and/or state Departments of Revenue. Finally, as the parent of a young adult on the autism spectrum, Jim is very involved in special needs planning, especially for client families with loved ones who have a disability.Jim’s experience specifically includes: representing clients in front of the IRS and/or Georgia or Tennessee Departments of Revenue during examinations, through appeals and, when necessary, into litigation, crafting tax structures for new business ventures, counseling clients on the tax aspects of business exit strategies and business succession issues, designing tax-effective executive compensation packages, creating appropriate estate plans, and counseling families on wealth planning.Jim began his professional tax career with the “Big 8” public accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand.
    [Show full text]
  • TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT of REVENUE Registering Your
    ixxiii2hiewix2yp2iix i egistering2our2fusiness sn2ennessee Dear Tennessee Taxpayer, This publication is designed to help taxpayers better understand Tennessee’s requirements for business registration. You may find registration compliance easier when you know more about the requirements. Please take time to acquaint yourself with how registration requirements apply to you. The Department of Revenue offers a toll free tax information line for Tennessee taxpayers. The number is 1-800-342-1003. If calling from Nashville or out-of-state, you may call (615) 253-0600. The Department of Revenue also offers a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) line at (615) 741-7398. In addition, the Department of Revenue offers a HOTLINE number for the exclusive use of the tax practitioner. In-state practitioners may call toll free 1-800-397-8395; from Nashville and out-of-state call (615) 253-0700. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact any of the offices listed below. Sincerely, Taxpayer Services Division Tennessee Department of Revenue Toll Free: 1-800-342-1003 Taxpayer Services Division Out-of-State: (615) 253-0600 Andrew Jackson Building, 3rd Floor TDD: (615) 741-7398 500 Deaderick Street Nashville, Tennessee 37242-1099 Regional Offices Chattanooga: Jackson: 540 McCallie Avenue Lowell Thomas State Office Bldg Suite 350 225 Dr. Martin L. King Drive Chattanooga, TN 37402 Box 44 (423) 634-6266 Jackson, TN 38301 (731) 423-5747 Johnson City: Knoxville Memphis 204 High Point Drive 531 Henley Street 3150 Appling Road Johnson City, TN 37601 Room 606 Bartlett, TN 38133 (423) 854-5321 Knoxville, TN 37902 (901) 213-1400 (865) 594-6100 Registering your Company to do Business in Tennessee Before beginning operations in Tennessee, a business must complete the appropriate application(s) and pay any applicable fees required at start-up.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Forest Hills • Earthsavers • Springback • Junk-King Stanford Drive Thriftsmart • Metro Police • Creative Recycling • Shred on the Run
    FOREST HILLS Record number of residents recycle at Clean Out NEWS A record 290 vehicles participated in the City’s Spring Recycling Clean Out April 12 as resi- dents recycled five tons of bulk metal and scrap items and three tons june 2014 of electronics. VOL. 19 NO. 2 Residents disposed of 24 cubic feet of medicines and do- nated 2,000 pounds of clothing, shoes, or reusable items. Spring, summer A new service was well received. “The paper shredding paving schedule was a great success,” said City Manager Amanda Dea- Recycling The following streets are ton-Moyer. “Shred on the Run helped us safely dispose of scheduled for paving, along 6,000 pounds of documents.” Clean Out with paving for the bikeway The fall clean out should see more-efficient operation as extension. organizers plan a circular drop-off route, she said. Beddington Park (tentative) Day Kingsbury Drive SPONSORS City of Forest Hills • Earthsavers • SpringBack • Junk-King Stanford Drive ThriftSmart • Metro Police • Creative Recycling • Shred on the Run TheThe Mayor’sMayor’s CornerCorner Hall Tax changes would affect Forest Hills The Hall Income Tax was established by the Tennessee six years but would have main- General Assembly in 1929 and is named for Frank S. Hall, the tained the revenues coming to local state senator who sponsored the legislation. The Hall Tax applies municipalities such as Forest Hills. to interest and dividend income at the rate of 6%. Five-eighths The Koch Brothers through their of the income from the Hall Tax goes into the state coffers and Americans for Prosperity organiza- Bill Coke three-eighths is distributed to the local municipality or county tion asked state legislators to take a Mayor where the taxpayer lives.
    [Show full text]
  • State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2020 FISCAL Katherine Loughead FACT Senior Policy Analyst No
    State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2020 FISCAL Katherine Loughead FACT Senior Policy Analyst No. 693 Feb. 2020 Key Findings • Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 37 percent of state tax collections in fiscal year (FY) 2017. • Forty-three states levy individual income taxes. Forty-one tax wage and salary income, while two states—New Hampshire and Tennessee—exclusively tax dividend and interest income. Seven states levy no individual income tax at all. • Of those states taxing wages, nine have single-rate tax structures, with one rate applying to all taxable income. Conversely, 32 states and the District of Columbia levy graduated-rate income taxes, with the number of brackets varying widely by state. Hawaii has 12 brackets, the most in the country. • States’ approaches to income taxes vary in other details as well. Some states double their single-bracket widths for married filers to avoid a “marriage penalty.” Some states index tax brackets, exemptions, and deductions for inflation; many others do not. Some states tie their standard deductions and personal exemptions to the federal tax code, while others set their own or offer none at all. The Tax Foundation is the nation’s leading independent tax policy research organization. Since 1937, our research, analysis, and experts have informed smarter tax policy at the federal, state, and global levels. We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. ©2020 Tax Foundation Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 Editor, Rachel Shuster Designer, Dan Carvajal Tax Foundation 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20005 202.464.6200 taxfoundation.org TAX FOUNDATION | 2 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 37 percent of state tax collections.1 Their prominence in public policy considerations is further enhanced in that individuals are actively responsible for filing their income taxes, in contrast to the indirect payment of sales and excise taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Knoxville Area City Residents Pay Both Property Taxes
    TAXES Under Tennessee Constitutional law, residential property is assessed at 25% of appraised value, and commercial/industrial property is assessed at 40%. The current property tax rate for Knox County residents is $2.36 per $100 assessed value. The assessment in the City of Knoxville is $2.46 per $100. Knoxville Area City residents pay both property taxes. The state sales tax is 5.5% on food and food ingredients and 7% on all other tangible personal property. The local rate, applicable countywide, is 2.25%, bringing the total sales tax in Knox County to 9.25%. About 60 percent of the local portion goes to the Knox County School system, the remainder dedicated to the general funds of the city and county. TRANSPORTATION Airlines ................................................................ 9 There is no personal income tax in Tennessee, but the state does levy a tax of 6% on stock dividends and Air Tran, Allegiant Air, American Eagle, Continental bond interest over $1,250 for single-filers. Called the Hall Income Tax, it applies to both individuals and Express, Delta, Frontier, United Express, USAirways partnerships. Express, Vision Daily Flights ............................. over 140 per day All businesses in Knox County must have an operating license. Establishments within the City of Air Services- 2010 Knoxville must have both a city and county license. Business taxes are calculated on gross receipts and Cargo Services ....................................................... 2 Freight (tons) ................................................. 46,698 are assessed within one of four classes. Assessments range from 1/40 of 1% to 3/16 of 1%, depending on type of business. Many professional services and manufacturers are exempt from local business Air Passengers ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • IN the COURT of APPEALS of TENNESSEE at KNOXVILLE September 20, 2011 Session
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 20, 2011 Session W. TURNER BOONE ET AL. v. LOREN L. CHUMLEY, COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Grainger County No. 03-125 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor No. E2010-01692-COA-R3-CV-FILED-NOVEMBER 30, 2011 W. Turner Boone and wife, Sally-Bruce M. Boone (“the Taxpayers”), are Tennessee residents who own stock in South Carolina corporations. In 2001, the Taxpayers paid South Carolina income tax of $43,328 based on pass-through income1 of $623,941. The Taxpayers received dividend distributions of $204,988 on the same income. They filed a 2001 Tennessee Hall Income Tax return reporting the dividends with a resulting tax of $12,288, against which they claimed a credit for a like amount based upon their payment of the South Carolina income tax. Their claimed credit is based upon a deduction allowed by statute for “tax paid to [another] state . provided, that there exists a tax credit reciprocity agreement between Tennessee and the other state.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-122 (2011). Loren L. Chumley, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Revenue (“the Commissioner”) declined to allow the credit. She gave notice of an outstanding tax liability for 2001 in the amount of $15,017.93, including penalties and interest. The Taxpayers paid the assessment under protest and filed this action against the Commissioner after they demanded and were denied a refund. The trial court upheld the Commissioner’s denial. The Taxpayers appeal. We affirm. Tenn.
    [Show full text]
  • 1964 Tennessee Survey
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 18 Issue 3 Issue 3 - June 1965 Article 21 6-1965 State and Local Taxation -- 1964 Tennessee Survey Paul I. Hartman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Taxation-State and Local Commons Recommended Citation Paul I. Hartman, State and Local Taxation -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 1255 (1965) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol18/iss3/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. State and Local Taxation-1964 Tennessee Survey Paul I. Hartman* I. INCOME TAx-DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VALUE OF OIGINAL INVESTMENT AND LIQUIDATION AND REDEMPTION VALUE II. EXCISE TAx-APPoTIONMENT OF EARNINGS BY DoMEsTIc CORPORATION III. EXCISE TAx-MEANNG OF "EARuN, cs" FOR CORPORATE TAX PuRPOSES I. INCOME TAx-DFFERENCE BETWEEN VALUE OF ORIGINAL INVESTMENT AND LIQUIDATION AND REDEMPTION VALUE Five cases involving a construction of sections 67-26021 and 67- 26092 of the income tax statute (Hall Income Tax) were consolidated for one opinion in the Gallagher case.3 Two of the cases involved the redemption of shares by the issuing corporations; the other three involved the liquidation of corporations, with a surrender of shares and distributions of assets. The Commissioner, in all of these situa- tions, imposed an income tax on the amount constituting the difference between the original investments in the shares and the sum received in liquidation or redemption.
    [Show full text]