11-13 Netty (Page

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

11-13 Netty (Page ISRAEL written by the Essenes who, according to the 1st tioned. In fact that’s because the Essenes never Roitman says that Josephus is a kind of century CE Jewish historian Josephus, flour- existed. The argument was made in the 1950’s. “ancient ethnographer” and he is describing “a ished in Judea from the 2nd century BCE to the I’m just making the same argument again and group at odds with contemporary Greco- 1st century CE, at the time of Jesus and just louder.” Roman society.” He says Elior is reading the before the destruction of the Second Temple in Speaking passionately, Elior theorizes that ancient sources, “in a simplistic way. She has 70 CE. But already in the 1950’s, in the infancy Josephus, a former Jewish priest who wrote his adopted a very problematic approach to ancient of Scroll scholarship, at least two respected history in Rome, invented the fable to rebut historiography.” Hebrew University professors of Semitic lin- negative Roman stereotypes about the Jews. guistics Moshe Goshen-Gottshein and Chaim “So he created an ‘imaginary’ Jewish sect of INCE THE FULL PUBLICATION OF Rabin questioned that theory. Elior says their virtuous, Spartan-like people who lived com- the scrolls eight years ago, the field has minority-view arguments were marginalized or munally and survived by adopting masses of Sbeen opened up to scholars in a wide dismissed entirely. orphans.” She conjectures that Josephus likely range of fields, from women’s studies to philol- Another, more sensational illustration of the chose that model because he knew that the ogy. Elior and Golb are part of that new wave passions that the debate arouses came in early Romans admired the Spartans. The real of scholars who came to the Dead Sea Scrolls March, with the arrest in New York of Raphael authors, she says, were likely the Sadducees, from other disciplines. Golb, son of University of Chicago Jewish his- descendants of Zadok, the Israelites’ high priest Born and raised in Israel, Elior says she torian Norman Golb, on suspicion of using under King David. The Sadducees served as stumbled on the possibility that the Essenes dozens of Internet aliases to reinforce his high priests until 175 BCE, when they were were a utopian fiction by chance, because of father’s case and defame one of his critics. The ousted by the Hasmoneans and were banished her academic interest in the history of Jewish senior Golb, also an expert on the Cairo from the Temple. “When the renegade sons of mysticism. Her 1987 sabbatical at Oxford Genizah library of documents which were Zadok, who were deeply conservative, left University coincided with Hebrew University found in the 19th century, has been arguing for Jerusalem, they took with them their library professor Emanuel Tov’s monumental editing years that the scrolls were the work of many which was all about their priestly heritage.” She of the scrolls there. “The printing press was at diverse groups. He has also argued that the theorizes that they took the library to isolated Oxford and I spent my time reading the vol- Qumran complex was not an Essene monastery Qumran for safekeeping because Jewish life umes as they were published. I noticed that the but a fortress for Jews fleeing Roman invaders. was unstable in Jerusalem. Elior notes that there scrolls were deeply connected to priestly mem- Author of the 1996 book “Who Wrote the Dead has always been a secondary debate among ory and affiliated with subjects that Sea Scrolls? The Search for the Secret of scholars whether the scrolls were actually writ- related to Sadducee tradition. The fact is, it was Qumran,” Golb has accused mainstream schol- ten in Qumran or just brought there for storage. their library, they wrote it.” ars of trying to silence him and of constituting a Elior’s theory has been rapidly and She admits breezily that she’s an “outsider” united sect no less fanatic than the Qumran sect. roundly rejected by mainstream scholars who in the cloistered world of Dead Sea Scroll Referring to the Golb affair, Elior told The angrily insist that she is blithely overturning 60 scholarship. “But so what, if I came to the sub- Jerusalem Report: “ It’s a personal tragedy for years of careful research and that her field is not ject in a round-about way?” she asks. “I have the Golb family which has nothing to do with the period of the scrolls, but Jewish mysticism been studying the Dead Sea Scrolls for many my book or what I have to say.” She says the of later periods. “She hasn’t even published a years. I make no remarks about archeology, measures taken by the Golb son were extreme single thing in a scholarly Dead Sea Scroll jour- only on texts that everybody can read.” She and unacceptable, however it’s legitimately nal,” charges Bar-Ilan University archeology insists that “an unbiased reader” will come to infuriating that that the senior Golb’s views professor Hanan Eshel. the same conclusion that she has. But the were automatically dismissed by others. Dr. Adolfo Roitman , curator of the Shrine Essene thesis, she says, was and remains the of the Book, which houses the Dead Sea Scroll majority opinion. Scholars who have ques- HE ESSENES ARE MENTIONED collection at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, tioned the existence of the Essenes have been by at least four 1st century sources: Philo tells The Report that he too “strongly dis- severely criticized since the 1950’s and contin- Tof Alexandria, the Hellenistic Jewish agrees” with Elior. He has not read her book, ue to be spurned today, she says, citing Golb. philosopher; Pliny the Elder, the Roman author; but says: “I don’t see any reason to refute care- The Essenes were first mentioned by Philo, Josephus, who said they lived in celibate absti- ful scholarship which says that the Essenes who died in the year 50 CE. He wrote that there nence from wordly pleasures, including sex; existed and wrote the scrolls.” Roitman says were more than 4,000 Essenes living in villages and the slightly later Dio Chrysostom, the that he is confident that the Essenes were a gen- throughout the Land of Israel. He claimed that Greek philosopher and historian. But Elior uine sect and he points out that they are referred these people lived simply and had no earthly asserts that what she calls Josephus’ “invented” to, in great detail by Josephus, Pliny, Philo and possessions, studied and strictly observed the writings on the subject were erroneously Dio Chrysostom. “The fact that they are not Sabbath. They were steeped in high ideals and repeated in subsequent centuries. She says that mentioned elsewhere is irrelevant,” he contin- love of God, led a communal life and possessed the Essenes are, in fact, a “legend” and aren’t ues. “Many significant ancient sects were only no slaves. The second “witness,” Pliny the even mentioned in the scrolls whose English- casually mentioned. That’s how ancient histori- Elder who died in the year 79, mentioned Ein language translation fills 39 volumes. “Philo ography works, that is what we have.” He cites Gedi, next to the Dead Sea, as their place of res- was telling a story. It is absurd to think that for the Herodians, a sect mentioned infrequently in idence, a location that Elior asserts was too so many years, such a large group of people, the New Testament as having shown an small an area to accommodate so many inhabi- numbering in the thousands, led a celibate life, unfriendly disposition towards Jesus as well as tants. Josephus, writing in the last third of the which is against the Jewish imperative to ‘go a sect of monastic healers who lived outside 1st century in Rome, provides the third testi- forth and multiply’ and are hardly ever men- Alexandria who are mentioned only by Philo. mony. He relates much the same information, 12 THE JERUSALEM REPORT APRIL 27, 2009.
Recommended publications
  • Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access
    690 American Archivist / Vol. 56 / Fall 1993 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/56/4/690/2748590/aarc_56_4_w213201818211541.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access SARA S. HODSON Abstract: The announcement by the Huntington Library in September 1991 of its decision to open for unrestricted research its photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls touched off a battle of wills between the library and the official team of scrolls editors, as well as a blitz of media publicity. The action was based on a commitment to the principle of intellectual freedom, but it must also be considered in light of the ethics of donor agreements and of access restrictions. The author relates the story of the events leading to the Huntington's move and its aftermath, and she analyzes the issues involved. About the author: Sara S. Hodson is curator of literary manuscripts at the Huntington Library. Her articles have appeared in Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook, and the Huntington Library Quarterly. This article is revised from a paper delivered before the Manuscripts Repositories Section meeting of the 1992 Society of American Archivists conference in Montreal. The author wishes to thank William A. Moffett for his encour- agement and his thoughtful and invaluable review of this article in its several revisions. Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls 691 ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1991, THE HUNTINGTON scrolls for historical scholarship lies in their LIBRARY set off a media bomb of cata- status as sources contemporary with the time clysmic proportions when it announced that they illuminate.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Golb, Professor Emeritus the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, USA
    Norman Golb, Professor Emeritus The Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, USA MONIEUX OR MUÑO? I Some fifty years ago, my attention was drawn to a medieval document of considerable historical importance, first published (but not translated) by Jacob Mann. The document, as I saw, merited closer attention not only because of the light it cast on Jewish proselytism and pogroms during the Middle Ages, but because Mann had visibly misread the key word in the text identifying the town where the document was prepared. Misreading the word as “ANYW,” Mann had implausibly identified the locality as Anjou (which, of course, is a province, not a town, in west- central France); but clearly the first letter of the word was an M (mem), not an A (aleph), and the resulting toponym was MNYW.1 The document consisted, in effect, of a letter of recommendation composed by a highly literate Jew (whose style appeared to be characterized by occasional Gallicisms) of MNYW for a female proselyte who was in dire need of assistance. Bearing this letter the woman had ultimately ended up in Cairo, where the document was found some eight hundred years later in the genizah (or storage room) of the old synagogue of Fustat. The story told in the letter was as follows: After converting to Judaism, the proselyte had fled from a “distant land” to the town of Narbonne, home of a major Jewish community in the Languedoc-Roussillon region of southern France. There, she had married one David of the prominent Todros family. (Remarkably, the proselyte herself is never once named in the letter.) When the couple had learned that her family was seeking her, they moved to MNYW.
    [Show full text]
  • Dávid Nóra Margaréta a Qumráni Közösség Thanatológiája a Második
    Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar Történelemtudományi Doktori Iskola Eszmetörténeti M űhely Dávid Nóra Margaréta A qumráni közösség thanatológiája a második Szentély korának eszmerendszerében és gyakorlatában Doktori (PhD) értekezés A doktori iskola vezet ője: Dr. Fröhlich Ida DSc A m űhely vezet ője: Dr. Fröhlich Ida DSc A disszertáció témavezet ője: Dr. Fröhlich Ida DSc 2009 0 Tartalomjegyzék 1. Bevezetés. A disszertáció témája, a választás oka, a disszertáció célja....................................................................................................................3 2. A téma kutatástörténete....................................................................................6 2.1. A tekercsek felfedezése el őtt.......................................................................7 2.2. A tekercsek felfedezése után.......................................................................9 3. A qumráni telep és a közösség.........................................................................15 4. A közösség életmódja, szokásrendszere a vonatkozó források alapján 4.1. Antik auktorok az esszénusokról..............................................................21 4.2. A tekercsek................................................................................................24 4.3. Régészeti leletek........................................................................................28 5. Tisztaság és tér a qumráni közösség eszmerendszerében................................36 6. A tér szakralitásának
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam Norman Golb (15.I.1928–29.Xii.2020)*
    IN MEMORIAM NORMAN GOLB (15.I.1928–29.XII.2020)* MICHAEL G. WECHSLER MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE, CHICAGO ! Norman Golb, who began his life in a densely-packed immigrant neighborhood in Chicago and rose to become one of the world’s leading Hebrew manuscript and Semitics scholars, has passed away. Golb was born in Albany Park in 1928. His parents, from the Ukraine, met after their families had settled in that northwest Chicago neighborhood along with thousands of other Jewish immigrants. A part-time actor in the Yiddish theater, Golb’s father Joseph sustained his family during the Depression by working as a barber, and later for the City of Chicago’s water department. Golb’s mother Rose, née Bilow, was a homemaker and part-time sales clerk at the old Fair department store. Not born into prosperous circumstances, Golb did not attend an elite university away from home. He first studied at Wright Junior College, now (Wilbur) Wright College, and thereafter at Roosevelt College (now University), receiving his B.A. in English literature. Golb received his first advanced training in Hebrew, Aramaic, and * This memorial essay consists primarily of edited excerpts drawn from the obituary of Norman Golb published on the Chicago Jewish Funerals website (<https://chicagojewishfunerals.com/funeral- detail-page/?case=64BBCEC4-A495-4F41-B718-A9D475B3174C>) and the biographical article by JOEL L. KRAEMER, « Portrait of the Scholar », in JOEL L. KRAEMER, MICHAEL G. WECHSLER (eds.), Pesher Naḥum: Texts and Studies in Jewish History and Literature from Antiquity through the Middles Ages Presented to Norman (Naḥum) Golb, The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago 2012 (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, 66), p.
    [Show full text]
  • BSBB9401 DEAD SEA SCROLLS Fall 2018 Dr. R. Dennis Cole NOBTS Mcfarland Chair of Archaeology Dodd Faculty 201 [email protected] 504-282-4455 X3248
    BSBB9401 DEAD SEA SCROLLS Fall 2018 Dr. R. Dennis Cole NOBTS Mcfarland Chair of Archaeology Dodd Faculty 201 [email protected] 504-282-4455 x3248 NOBTS MISSION STATEMENT The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. COURSE PURPOSE, CORE VALUE FOCUS, AND CURRICULUM COMPETENCIES New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary has five core values: Doctrinal Integrity, Spiritual Vitality, Mission Focus, Characteristic Excellence, and Servant Leadership. These values shape both the context and manner in which all curricula are taught, with “doctrinal integrity” and “characteristic academic excellence” being especially highlighted in this course. NOBTS has seven basic competencies guiding our degree programs. The student will develop skills in Biblical Exposition, Christian Theological Heritage, Disciple Making, Interpersonal Skills, Servant Leadership, Spiritual & Character Formation, and Worship Leadership. This course addresses primarily the compentency of “Biblical Exposition” competency by helping the student learn to interpret the Bible accurately through a better understanding of its historical and theological context. During the Academic Year 2018-19, the focal competency will be Doctrinal Integrity.. COURSE DESCRIPTION Research includes historical background and description of the Qumran cult and problems relating to the significance and dating of the Scrolls. Special emphasis is placed on a theological analysis of the non- biblical texts of the Dead Sea library on subjects such as God, man, and eschatology. Meaningful comparisons are sought in the Qumran view of sin, atonement, forgiveness, ethics, and messianic expectation with Jewish and Christian views of the Old and New Testaments as well as other Interbiblical literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oriental Institute News & Notes No
    oi.uchicago.edu THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE NEWS & NOTES NO. 165 SPRING 2000 © THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO AS THE SCROLLS ARRIVE IN CHICAGO... NormaN Golb, ludwig rosenberger Professor in Jewish History and Civilization During the past several years, some strange events have befallen the logic as well as rhetoric by which basic scholarly positions the storied Dead Sea Scrolls — events that could hardly have on the question of the scrolls’ nature and origin had been and been foreseen by the public even a decade ago (and how much were continuing to be constructed. During the 1970s and 1980s, the more so by historians, who, of all people, should never at- I had made many fruitless efforts in encouragement of a dialogue tempt to predict the future). Against all odds, the monopoly of this kind, but only in the 1990s, perhaps for reasons we will on the scrolls’ publication, held for over forty years by a small never fully understand, was such discourse finally initiated. And coterie of scholars, was broken in 1991. Beginning with such it had important consequences, leading to significant turning pioneering text publications as those of Ben-Zion Wacholder in points in the search for the truth about the scrolls’ origins. Cincinnati and Michael Wise in Chicago, and continuing with One of the most enlightening of these came in 1996, when the resumption of the Discoveries in the Judaean Desert series England’s Manchester University hosted an international confer- of Oxford University Press, researchers everywhere discovered ence on a single manuscript discovered in Cave III — a role of how rich these remnants of ancient Hebraic literature of intert- simple bookkeeping entries known as the Copper Scroll.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qumran Collection As a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sidnie White Crawford Publications Classics and Religious Studies 2016 The Qumran Collection as a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crawfordpubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sidnie White Crawford Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Qumran Collection as a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford Since the early days of Dead Sea Scrolls scholarship, the collection of scrolls found in the eleven caves in the vicinity of Qumran has been identified as a library.1 That term, however, was undefined in relation to its ancient context. In the Greco-Roman world the word “library” calls to mind the great libraries of the Hellenistic world, such as those at Alexandria and Pergamum.2 However, a more useful comparison can be drawn with the libraries unearthed in the ancient Near East, primarily in Mesopotamia but also in Egypt.3 These librar- ies, whether attached to temples or royal palaces or privately owned, were shaped by the scribal elite of their societies. Ancient Near Eastern scribes were the literati in a largely illiterate society, and were responsible for collecting, preserving, and transmitting to future generations the cultural heritage of their peoples. In the Qumran corpus, I will argue, we see these same interests of collection, preservation, and transmission. Thus I will demonstrate that, on the basis of these comparisons, the Qumran collection is best described as a library with an archival component, shaped by the interests of the elite scholar scribes who were responsible for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews ∵
    Dead Sea Discoveries 23 (2016) 233–264 brill.com/dsd Book Reviews ∵ John J. Collins Scriptures and Sectarianism: Essays on the Dead Sea Scrolls. WUNT I.332. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014. Hardcover. Pp. xiv + 329. € 119. ISBN 978-3-16-153210-8. John Collins’s most recent collection of essays contains articles that were writ- ten between 2003 and 2013, which originally appeared as journal articles or in Festschriften and other collections. Since some of these articles may become difficult to obtain over the years, it is helpful to have them together in one volume. All of the essays exhibit Collins’s clear prose and cogent argument, as well as his meticulous use of primary and secondary sources. While the essays focus on the Qumran Scrolls in particular, they also demonstrate his command of the wider field of Second Temple literature and history. The result is a vol- ume that is essential reading for scholars of Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity. The volume is divided into three parts: 1) Scripture and Interpretation; 2) History and Sectarianism; and 3) The Sectarian Worldview. It is preceded by an introductory essay that has not appeared in print elsewhere, and con- cludes with an epilogue that illustrates the relevance of the Qumran Scrolls for the study of early Christianity. Finally, it includes a bibliography, an index of ancient names and sobriquets, an index of modern authors, and an index of Scripture and other ancient sources. The introduction, subtitled “What Have We Learned from the Dead Sea Scrolls?,” gives an overview of issues in the field, including Collins’s own posi- tions and overarching theory concerning Qumran origins.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Golb 7 December 2011 Oriental Institute, University of Chicago
    This article examines a series of false, erroneous, and misleading statements in Dead Sea Scroll museum exhibits. The misinformation can be broken down into four basic areas: (1) erroneous claims concerning Judaism and Jewish history; (2) speculative, arbitrary and inaccurate claims about the presumed “Essenes” of Qumran; (3) misleading claims concerning Christian origins; and (4) religiously slanted rhetoric concerning the “true Israel” and the “Holy Land.” The author argues that the statements, viewed in their totality, raise serious concerns regarding the manner in which the Scrolls are being presented to the public. Norman Golb 7 December 2011 Oriental Institute, University of Chicago RECENT SCROLL EXHIBITS AND THE DECLINE OF QUMRANOLOGY While significant advances have been made in Dead Sea Scrolls research over the past decade, defenders of the traditional “Qumran-sectarian” theory continue to use various publicity tools to push their agenda. These tools include, for example, the recent media campaign surrounding the claim that textiles found in the caves near Qumran “may” demonstrate that the site was inhabited by Essenes — a sensationalist argument that misleads the public with a mix of speculation and presuppositions.1 The tools have also included museum exhibits where efforts, either overt or subtle, are made to convince the public that the traditional theory is still viable. If we focus merely on the museums, we find that a noteworthy aspect of the exhibits involves the dissemination of certain erroneous and misleading facts concerning Jewish history and Christian origins. I here discuss some of the more obvious distortions, quoting from various exhibits of the past two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • What Scriptures Or Bible Nearest to Original Hebrew Scriptures? Anong Biblia Ang Pinaka-Malapit Sa Kasulatang Hebreo
    WHAT BIBLE TO READ WHAT SCRIPTURES OR BIBLE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES? ANONG BIBLIA ANG PINAKA-MALAPIT SA KASULATANG HEBREO KING JAMES BIBLE OLD TESTAMENT IS THE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES BECAUSE THE OLD TESTAMENT WAS DIRECTLY TRANSLATED FROM HEBREW COLUMN OF ORIGENS’S HEXAPLA. KING JAMES BIBLE ALSO WAS COMPARED TO NEWLY FOUND DEAD SEA SCROLL WITH CLOSE AND VERY NEAR TRANSLATION TO THE TEXT FOUND ON DEAD SEA SCROLL ni Isagani Datu-Aca Tabilog WHAT SCRIPTURES OR BIBLE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES? KING JAMES BIBLE OLD TESTAMENT IS THE NEAREST TO ORIGINAL HEBREW SCRIPTURES BECAUSE THE OLD TESTAMENT WAS DIRECTLY TRANSLATED FROM HEBREW COLUMN OF ORIGENS’S HEXAPLA. KING JAMES BIBLE ALSO WAS COMPARED TO NEWLY FOUND DEAD SEA SCROLL WITH CLOSE AND VERY NEAR TRANSLATION TO THE TEXT FOUND ON DEAD SEA SCROLL Original King Iames Bible 1611 See the Sacred Name YAHWEH in modern Hebrew name on top of the Front Cover 1 HEXAPLA FIND THE DIFFERENCE OF DOUAI BIBLE VS. KING JAMES BIBLE Genesis 6:1-4 Genesis 17:9-14 Isaiah 53:8 Luke 4:17-19 AND MANY MORE VERSES The King James Version (KJV), commonly known as the Authorized Version (AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed in 1611. First printed by the King's Printer Robert Barker, this was the third translation into English to be approved by the English Church authorities. The first was the Great Bible commissioned in the reign of King Henry VIII, and the second was the Bishops' Bible of 1568.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Fifty Years After Their Discovery: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20–25, 1997, Edited by Lawrence H
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department Classics and Religious Studies 2003 Review of The Dead Sea Scrolls, Fifty Years after Their Discovery: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20–25, 1997, edited by Lawrence H. Schiffman, Emanuel Tov, and James C. VanderKam; executive editor Galen Marquis Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classics Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "Review of The Dead Sea Scrolls, Fifty Years after Their Discovery: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20–25, 1997, edited by Lawrence H. Schiffman, Emanuel Tov, and James C. VanderKam; executive editor Galen Marquis" (2003). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 105. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 97 Published in Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 329 (2003), pp. 96-97. Copyright © 2007 American Schools of Oriental Research. The Dead Sea Scrolls, Fifty Years after Their Discovery: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20–25, 1997, edited by Lawrence H. Schiffman, Emanuel Tov, and James C. VanderKam; executive editor Galen Marquis. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society and the Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, 2000. xxi + 970 pp., 48 figures, 1 table. Cloth. $104.00.
    [Show full text]
  • METHODS of INVESTIGATION .OF the DEAD SEA SCROLLS and the KHIRBET QUMRAN SITE: a CONFERENCE REPORT by Michael O
    THE oi.uchicago.edu ORIENTAL I NEWS & NOTES NO . 137 SPRING 1993 ©THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO METHODS OF INVESTIGATION .OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS AND THE KHIRBET QUMRAN SITE: A CONFERENCE REPORT By Michael O. Wise, Assistant Professor, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations The New York Academy of Sciences tions), and Michael Wise (Department case. Three papers, delivered by AI and the Oriental Institute co-sponsored a of Near Eastern Languages and Civiliza­ Wolters, P. Kyle McCarter and Peter conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls, tions), the actual organizers of the Muchowski, focused on the Copper "Methods of Investigation of the Dead conference. William Sumner, Director of Scroll, a Qumran "treasure map" Sea Scrolls and the Khirbet Qumran the Oriental Institute, delivered the inscribed on metal. Describing places in Site: Present Realities and Future opening remarks in which he empha­ the Judaean Wilderness where various Prospects," held at the Murray Sargent sized the significance of a conference on treasures as well as scrolls were buried, Auditorium of the New York Blood the Dead Sea Scrolls that was sponsored it is a text of great importance for an Center from December 14 through 17. by organizations of a scientific nature. understanding of the nature of the scroll Numerous participants, including thirty cache, but its study has been unfortu­ This was the first major international speakers from a dozen nations, met for nately neglected. meeting devoted to the Dead Sea Scrolls <our days of papers and discussions. The since full scholarly access to all related James Charlesworth brought new University of Chicago was represented materials became the rule late in 1991.
    [Show full text]