DOCSLIB.ORG

Swarm Architecture II Kas Oosterhuis 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swarm Architecture II Kas Oosterhuis 2006 Swarm Architecture II Kas Oosterhuis 2006 Space is a computation. Architects design constructs as to structure the movements of information. This is true for the simplest house. Urban planners design strategies as to structure the flow of information in the city. This is true for all cities, big or small. Instead of focusing on the material appearance of spaces which are built after imagining the movements of people, we must pay more attention to the membranes of those spaces in the design process and to the openings in the membranes allowing for the flow of information in whatever form. A door essentially is an on-off switch in the membrane, the movement of stuff is structured as to flow through that door. Doors are open or closed [or half open and half-closed], the spaces are switched on or off, or sort of switched on or off. The membranes are semi-permeable envelopes around a certain quantized volume of space. The semi-permeable membranes let through people, light, heat, cold, small animals, air, radiation, information, food, water, gas, waste, molecules, wind, sun, moist, materials, cars, shopping bags, television programmes, waves, books, paper. A wide range of different materials is coming in through the membranes, another wide range of materials is leaving the space somewhat later. Some things come in through explicit holes, others come in by diffusion, by radiation, by transmission, or are carried by other messengers. Much of it is carried by people, coming in and going out. People are information carriers, they run in, about and out the house. The information they carry out of the house is of different content then the information – in whatever disguise – they take out of their house. The information content and some material properties of incoming information is changed inside the space. This space can be considered as a content transformer, it digests the incoming material / information. Taken to the extreme all material is a form of information, and taken even further all information is a form of computation. Thus space computes information. The question to be raised here is: does the space compute or do the people in the space compute? In the context of Swarm Architecture I understand human action in such a way that it must be the space which does the trick. The space is full of more or less active components, many of them communication with each other, many of them interacting with certain intervals, and many of them interacting in real time. I see people as drivers of the space when looking at it from a certain distance. To understand this better you may imagine a highway with cars running on it. When one finds oneself inside this traffic system, one always refers to the other players as cars. You always would state: that car came from the right, there goes a Ferrari. The cars are the players in the traffic system, and these cars are eventually driven by someone, but they are only their operators, they basically function as programmes running the car. So the car is the flocking bird in the traffic swarm, and the person is a member of the running car, and not a member of the highway traffic system. How can we look at space with this in mind? Then it is the space itself that behaves and acts, as driven by their programmes and executed by a variety of actors, among them people, but also light bulbs, refrigerators, vacuum cleaners, sofa's, shopping, bookshelves, tables and chairs. They all move or are moved inside a certain space. In the mind of the Swarm Architect, all actors / players behave in relation to each other following a set of simple rules. And it is the space which defines the workspace of the players. Seen from further away this space interacts with other spaces. Then you loose track of the swarm of interacting players within the space with their semi-permeable membranes, and you are monitoring a swarm of interacting spaces. And the human people flow through this from space to space, from car to space, from small space to vast space. Seen from the point of view of space, people operate on the space as if they operate a computer. Just like the computer does the computation, the space performs the computation and transforms the information content of the information / materials absorbed into it. People also compute in their own domain: they feed on vegetables and meat, they eat and drink, they absorb sounds and light, they smell and sense. People compute that information and spit out information in a different format. People are transformers, just like spaces are transformers on a meta-level as seen in relation to people. Now that we have left behind the anthropocentric world view, which states that people are in the centre of knowledge, and now that we have accepted space and people as equal players in the field, we can start thinking of another approach towards architecture. Now we can build up a language of Swarm Architecture [SA from now on]. In SA people interact with people, books interact with tables, paper interacts with people, all are active players in a complex adaptive system called a car, a space, a home, a street, a city. The building becomes the installation. The ultimate task of SA is to inform its new born structures in real time. The design task of the information architect is how to keep the process alive and apply meaning to the behaviour in real time. How can the designers tunnel a continuous stream of data to and from the built structure and give meaning to the shape and content of the structures changing in real time? To facilitate this fundamental new world view we must look at buildings as if they are instruments, which can be played in real time. These dynamic buildings I regard as running processes, which are continuously informed and which continuously inform other running processes. They are active nodes in a complex adaptive operational network. So humans are running processes themselves too. Applying new available techniques they cooperate in the making of instrumental buildings which are essentially running processes as well. The building becomes an active installation where numerous actuators are constantly communicating with other actuators, their users and their environments. We know from practice that in each building there is already a large portion of the budget dedicated to the electro-technical and mechanical installations up to 30% of the total budget. In the bright future of instrumental buildings the whole structure will be interpreted as an installation. Project the actual trends into the near future it makes sense to regard all constituting components of the built structure as active members of the installation. The building becomes an instrument, it becomes the installation. A fine parallel can be drawn here with interactive art installations. Most art installations have a temporary nature. They are there for the period of the exhibition. Imagine to extend the art installation into the life cycle of a building, and we have a quite accurate picture of the installation building. We find ourselves living inside the installation space of the performance. In our art, architecture and programming driven practice ONL Ilona Lénárd and myself did a similar leap when we were developing buildings as big scale sculpture buildings / building sculptures back in 1994. We developed the concept of buildings like big scale sculptures in the Sculpture City project (1). Buildings could be explicit sculptures, and sculptures could function like buildings without compromising on the meaning of the sculpture. Now I propose to make the next jump: consider the building / sculpture as an active installation, and consider the city as a swarm of interacting installations. Forget about the city as a collection of static objects, it is only a small part of the quantized city game. In the near future we are planning to come up with a project called Installation City. Architecture finally becomes truly time-based, it is no longer a simulation, not only in the isolated sectors of the design process but in the experience of the space itself. Space in Swarm Architecture communicates actively with the users of the space in real time: they know each other, they flock together, space and people are becoming linked through a complex series of networks. The knowledge of people is only meaningful because of the connections with other brains. There does not exist something like an independent brain. Knowledge, consciousness, wisdom, innovations, emotions, they all are only possible by their connection to other people. The same is true for cars. One car without the existence of many many other cars has little or no meaning. Neither has the car meaning without a road network where it can drive around. In much the same way our personal computers do not exist disconnected from other computers. You simple need a population of peers to exist as a species. The evolution of the PC is only possible because of their connections to other PC's through a peer to peer network. There must be information exchange possible between the peers. And naturally the population must relate to a multitude of other species as well. Kevin Kelly was right again when we stated that the We are the Web 2). The Internet is regarded as a giant brain, where the millions of connected PC's are the neurons, firing information into the network. And we people assist in keeping that network operational, we carry information to our PC's, which in their turn submit the info into the global system by one of their running programmes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Design and Fabrication of Innovative Forms in a Continuum
    International Symposium File to Factory: The Design and Fabrication of Innovative Forms in a Continuum Host: CMA (Centre for Mediterranean Architecture), Chania, Crete, Greece, 3-4 September 2009 Design and Fabrication The i n a m s u m r Design and Fabrication o u f e n v of innovative forms in a i i t a t T v f2f o file to factory n n n h e i continuum o h e continuum f o T c ISBN 978-2-930301-41-9 editor: Maria Voyatzaki D esign and Fabri c a t i o n c o f o i n n n o v t a t i i v n e f u o r m u s m i n a f2f file to factory continuum Design and Fabrication The i n a m s u m r Design and Fabrication o u f e n v of innovative forms in a i i t a t T v f2f o file to factory n n n h e i continuum o h e continuum f o T c ISBN 978-2-930301-41-9 editor: Maria Voyatzaki D esign and Fabri c a t i o n c o f o i n n n o v t a t i i v n e f u o r m u s m i n a f2f file to factory continuum gn and Fabrication The i n a m s u m r Design and Fabrication o u f e n D e s i v of innovative forms in a i i t a t T v f2f o file to factory n n n h e i continuum o h e continuum f o T c ISBN 978-2-930301-41-9 editor: Maria Voyatzaki D File to Factory: The Design and Fabrication of Innovative Forms in a Continuum esign and Fabri c a t i o n Editor c o f o i n Dr Maria Voyatzaki, DipArch, PhD, RIBA, ARB n n o v t a t i Associate Professor i v n e f u o r Aristotle University of Thessaloniki m u s m School of Architecture i n a f2f file to factory continuum Cover design: Emmanouil Zaroukas Layout design: Dimitris Apostolidis Printed by: Charis Ltd, Thessaloniki, Greece ISBN 978-960-99008-1-2 Copyright © 2010 by the authors All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Digital Mobility An Architecture for the Digital Lifestyle A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE In the School of Architecture and Interior Design College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning 16 May 2007 Mark W. Chachula Bachelor of Architectural Engineering The Pennsylvania State University Committee Chair: Jay Chatterjee Committee Second Chair: Elizabeth Riorden Abstract Being mobile means having the ability to easily access goods, services, information and people from other physi- cal locations. Traditionally this meant traveling from place to place or building to building. With the computer and the internet, however, it is possible to do these things all from one single location regardless of where we are on Earth. This is Digital Mobility. Today with the internet this takes place through a screen using a mouse and keyboard as opposed to through experiencing a variety of buildings and spaces. Architecture for the digital lifestyle will merge our digital experiences with physical experiences by providing a reconfigurable environment that allows us to truly inhabit the internet. Instead of experiencing the internet through the screen it is experienced through the building and the space we inhabit. In this way there is access to many dif- ferent places and environments from one single location.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for an Architectural Knowledge Ecosystem Through the Distribution of Authorship
    FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY CANAN ALBAYRAK DE BRITO COLAÇO IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2018 Approval of the thesis: FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP submitted by CANAN ALBAYRAK DE BRITO COLAÇO in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Halil Kalıpçılar Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. F. Cânâ Bilsel Head of Department, Architecture Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan Supervisor, Architecture., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. C. Abdi Güzer Architecture Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan Architecture Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Şule Taşlı Pektaş Architecture Dept., Başkent University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fehmi Doğan Architecture Dept., Izmir Institute of Technology Assist. Prof. Dr. Başak Uçar Architecture Dept., TED University Date: 04.09.2018 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Signature : iv ABSTRACT FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP Albayrak de Brito Colaço, Canan Ph.D., Department of Architecture Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan September 2018, 128 pages Shifts from centralized towards socially distributed knowledge production modes are having a great impact on many fields and reshaping the understanding of knowledge production.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Buildings 230 Architects 6 Geographical Regions 80 Countries a U R P E Or Am S Ica Fr a Ce Ia
    400 Buildings 100 single houses┆53 schools┆21 art galleries 66 museums┆7 swimming pools┆2 town halls 230 Architects 52 office buildings┆33 unibersities┆5 international 6 Geographical Regions airports21 libraries┆5 embassies┆30 hotels 5 railway staions 80 Countries 80Architects dings Buil 125 ia As O ce an ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS//OMA//FUKSAS//ASYMPTOTE ARCHITECTURE//ANDRÉS ia 6 5 PEREA ARCHITECT//SNØHETTA//BERNARD TSCHUMI//COOP HIMMELB(L)AU//FOSTER + B u i ld in g PARTNERS//UNStudio//laN+//KISHO KUROKAWA ARCHITECT AND ASSOCIATES//STEVEN s s t c e 8 it 0 h A c r HOLL ARCHITECTS//JOHN PORTMAN & ASSOCIATES//3DELUXE//TADAO ANDO ARCHITECT r c A h 0 it e 8 c t s & ASSOCIATES//MVRDV//SAUCIER + PERROTTE ARCHITECTES//ACCONCI STUDIO// s g n i d l i DRIENDL*ARCHITECTS//OGRYDZIAK / PRILLINGER ARCHITECTS//URBAN ENVIRONMENTS u B 5 0 ARCHITECTS//ORTLOS SPACE ENGINEERING//MOSHE SAFDIE AND ASSOCIATES INC.// 2 LOMA //JENSEN & SKODVIN ARKITEKTKONTOR AS+ARNE HENRIKSEN ARKITEKTER AS + e p o C-V HØLMEBAKK ARKITEKT//HENN ARCHITEKTEN//GIENCKE & COMPANY//CHETWOODS r u E A ARCHITECTS//AAARCHITECTEN//ABALOS+SENTKIEWICZ ARQUITECTOS//VARIOUS f r i ARCHITECTS//DENTON CORKER MARSHALL//SAMYN AND PARTNERS//ANTOINE PREDOCK// c a FREE Fernando Romero...... 3 5 s B t c u e i t l i d h i n c r g s A 0 8 8 0 s A g r c n i h d i l t i e u c B t s 0 9 a c i r e m A h t r o N S o u t h A m e r i c s t a c e t i h c r A 0 8 1 s 1 g n 5 i d B l i u ISBN 978-978-12585-2-6 7 8 9 7 8 1 Editorial Department of Global Architecture Practice Editorial Department of Global Architecture
    [Show full text]
  • From File to Factory: Advanced Manufacture of Engineered Wood Elements
    From file to factory: Advanced manufacture of engineered wood elements Part 1: Innovative design solutions for multi-storey timber buildings throughout the entire building process Part 2: Application to project Zembla in Kalmar, Sweden Magnus Larsson Alex Kaiser Ulf Arne Girhammar From file to factory: Advanced manufacture of engineered wood elements Part 1: Innovative design solutions for multi-storey timber buildings throughout the entire building process Part 2: Application to project Zembla in Kalmar, Sweden Magnus Larsson Alex Kaiser Ulf Arne Girhammar Luleå University of Technology Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics Division of Wood Science and Engineering ISSN 1402-1528 ISBN 978-91-7790-870-8 (print) ISBN 978-91-7790-884-5 (pdf) Luleå 2020 www.ltu.se FROM FILE TO FACTORY: Advanced manufacture of engineered wood elements – Part 1: Innovative design solutions for multi-storey timber buildings throughout the entire building process Magnus Larsson1, Alex Kaiser2, Ulf Arne Girhammar2,* 1 Former Luleå University of Technology, Sweden 2 Division of Wood Science and Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 931 87 Skellefteå, Sweden ABSTRACT: “File-to-factory” processes of computer technologies is a contemporary way to both maximise efficiency throughout the building process, increase a building's performance, and be able to add interesting architectural possibilities throughout the design phase. Viewing the building as a parametric network of connected components that can be individually controlled through unique parameters may no longer be a novel architectural concept, but its application to multi-storey timber buildings is still a territory for which there are no maps. Allowing not only the notion of identicality in mechanically reproduced objects to be left behind, but replacing the idea of the object with that of the objectile, the authors investigate a novel approach that produces a set of building trajectories rather than a set of buildings, yet yields a series of buildable examples of those trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • Final IA 14022007.Indd
    > content > page 4 introduction / editorial Kas Oosterhuis > page 12 research / File to Factory and Real Time Behavior in ONL-Architecture Kas Oosterhuis, Henriette Bier, Cas Aalbers, Sander Boer / Envisioning the Responsive Milieu Nimish Biloria, Kas Oosterhuis / Virtual Reality Operation Room Hans Hubers, Sven Blokker, Michael Bitterman, Christian Friedrich > page 12 education / Designing a Hyperbody of a Train Station Design Lab Tomasz Jaskiewicz / Emotive Office & Papabubble Dominik Otto > page 12 workshops / Robot Driven Swarm Paintings Dimitris Theocharoudis, Hans Hubers > page 12 dialogue Kas Oosterhuis and Ayssar Arida > page 12 linked > page 12 contributors 2 > introduction / editorial two systems find a new equilibrium: number of people, goods, light, temperature, and data. The door processes by counting what passes through the opening. In iA we do exactly that -- our iA software counts every change that occurs in the position and configuration of any IPO object. Each object that is defined in Protospace *) software (developed during the past few years by the Centre for Interactive Architecture), behaves in time and What is Interactive Architecture? Let me first keeps track of changes. Each object is a kind of clarify what it is NOT. Interactive Architecture IPO machine, an agent communicating with other - from here on abbreviated as iA - is NOT simply agents. An example of this type of communication architecture that is responsive or adaptive is a bird communicating with other birds in a swarm. to changing circumstances. On the contrary, Birds are complex adaptive IPO systems. They iA is based on the concept of bi-directional receive signals, they process these signals and communication, which requires two active parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Review
    Archivolta 1(57)2013 Summary Review ____________________________________________________ ®Archivolta Publishing House Michal Stepien Krystyna Januszkiewicz, Mateusz Zwierzycki, Sensitive skin of Al Bahar Towers in Abu Dhabi, UAE pp. 10-23 Aedas Abu Dhabi and Arup London The Al Bahar Towers innovative dynamic façade opens and closes in response to the movement of the sun, reducing solar gain by more than 50 percent, creating a more comfortable internal environment for occupants and producing a distinctive external aesthetics which helps to define the building as a gateway to the UAE capital. The façade was conceived as a contemporary inter- pretation of the traditional Islamic “mashrabiya” a popular form of wooden lattice screen found in vernacular Islamic architecture and used as a device for achieving privacy. The design concept for Aedas’ innovative competition winning design is derived from an algorith- mic composition, informed by Islamic principles of design, that has been supplemented by the application of a dynamic translucent ‘mashrabiya’ which opens and closes in response to the movement of the sun. The resulting composition seeks to create a building which is both cultura- lly and environmentally responsive, reflecting the aspirations of the brief while also respecting the emergent Abu Dhabi 2030 Plan. The building is targeting a LEED Silver rating and is on program-me for occupation at the beginning of 2013. In order to generate the form of the towers, Aedas applied the principles of geometric compo- sition derived from traditional Islamic architecture. Geometric composition has been a defining characteristic of Islamic architecture for centuries, the circle and rotation reflecting the concept of unification and unity evident in nature; an important concept in Islam and in the emerging science of biomimicry.
    [Show full text]
  • In This City Special, Frame Heads to Budapest to Check out the Swiftly Advancing Design Scene
    Best of BUDAPEST In this city special, Frame heads to Budapest to check out the swiftly advancing design scene. Photos Tamás Bujnovszky Budapest 132 Best of BUDAPEST Budapest In this city special, Frame heads to Budapest 133 to check out the swiftly advancing design scene. Budapest by Numbers 1873 A city full of history is Budapest’s two sides – BUDA and PEST, separated by the River Danube ready for the future. – merge to become one city FACTS AND FIGURES AND FACTS 1877 NYUGATI STATION, 1845 an icon of European railway József Hild designs ST STEPHEN’S architecture, is completed BASILICA; construction begins six years later Budapest UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITES: Buda Castle district, banks of the Danube, and Andrássy Avenue 130 THERMAL SPRINGS feed the city’s spas 134 525 km2, CITY AREA 1.73million, POPULATION in 2011 2 million in 1991 1931 1880 2004 FIGURES AND FACTS MOHOLY-NAGY UNIVERSITY Budapest-born Ernő Goldfinger Hungary joins the OF ART AND DESIGN founded designs the ENTAS CHAIR EUROPEAN UNION (as the Hungarian Royal Institute of Arts and Crafts) 1896 MUSEUM OF APPLIED ARTS, 1989 designed by Ödön Lechner THE THIRD HUNGARIAN REPUBLIC and Gyula Pártos, is built is established Budapest udapest is inspiring – just ask Swiss lobby – with its soaring dome of light – Nagy Àruhàz (Paris Department Store), architect Peter Zumthor. Before is particularly stunning. a 1911 design by Zsigmond Sziklai. This, 135 Bdesigning the now revered Therme Elsewhere in the city, along the Margit too, was recently renovated and is now Vals in his native land, he visited the körút ring road, Budapest flaunts its open to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply Complex, Toward a New Kind of Building
    Frontiers of Architectural Research (2012) 1, 411–420 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/foar CASE STUDY Simply complex, toward a new kind of building Kas Oosterhuisn TU Delft, Hyperbody, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, Z-H, Netherlands Received 15 April 2012; received in revised form 11 August 2012; accepted 15 August 2012 KEYWORDS Abstract Nonstandard; The world around us is evolving. We are living inside evolution. As a practicing architect I find Customization; nothing more natural than to look around me and implement relevant changes into my own Complexity; profession. Taking this seriously means implementing new digital technologies in the very fabric Parametric; of design methods, from the first conceptual thought and from the first accurately described Programmable; design proposal. Mass production is soon to be overhauled by the principles of customization, in Swarm the form of both industrial mass customization and in the form of distributed small scale household fabrication. Customization, which is the modern made to measure, will change architecture from its very foundations. A completely new esthetic will be the natural outcome of the digital parametric design process that connects the file to factory CNC production methods— a new kind of beauty for a new kind of building. Complexity based on simple rules characterizes the dramatic paradigm shift from mass production to customization. The new kind of building is complex yet systemic in its design method. The new kind of building dramatically enhances the potential of today’s architectural expression while keeping strict control on its data, including costs. Truly nonstandard architecture is cost-effective and simply complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossfit Design: Maximizing Building Potential Across Broad Time and Modal Domains
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2009 Crossfit esiD gn: Maximizing Building Potential Across Broad Time and Modal Domains Benjamin W. Goodale University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Part of the Architecture Commons Goodale, Benjamin W., "Crossfit eD sign: Maximizing Building Potential Across Broad Time and Modal Domains" (2009). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 304. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/304 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CROSSFIT DESIGN: MAXIMIZING BUILDING POTENTIAL ACROSS BROAD TIME AND MODAL DOMAINS A Thesis Presented by BENJAMIN GOODALE Submitted to the Department of Art, Architecture and Art History of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE May 2009 Architecture + Design Program Department of Art, Architecture and Art History CROSSFIT DESIGN: MAXIMIZING BUILDING POTENTIAL ACROSS BROAD TIME AND MODAL DOMAINS A Thesis Presented by BENJAMIN GOODALE Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________ Ray Kinoshita Mann, Chairperson ____________________________ Skender Luarasi, Member ____________________________ Stephen Schreiber, Member ____________________________________ William Oedell Department Chair Department of Art, Architecture, and Art History DEDICATION This thesis project is dedicated to my father, Douglas T. Goodale II, who taught me how to build, how to think, and always encouraged me to pursue the life of a Renaissance Man.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbody Non-Standard & Interactive Architecture Hyperbody Protospace
    HYPERBODY NON-STANDARD & INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE HYPERBODY PROTOSPACE Hyperbody is a research group at the Faculty of Architecture at the Delft The protoSPACE 3.0 laboratory is an initiative of Prof. Ir. Kas Oosterhuis, is University of Technology directed by prof. ir. Kas Oosterhuis. The goals set for developed by Hyperbody at the Delft University of Technology as a revolution- the group’s research are to explore techniques and methods for designing and ary real-time collaborative design environment. Located in the Faculty of Archi- building of non-standard, virtual and interactive architectures. Cutting edge tecture at TU Delft, protoSPACE 3.0 is a unique, state of the art multi-purpose techniques and methods are taught and applied by researchers and students. facility designed for the development of non-standard, virtual, and interactive Designed and prototyped programmable buildings illustrate the paradigm shift architecture. In this initial phase protoSPACE 3.0 is built up of several compo- from animation towards real-time behaviour. Hyperbody introduces interactiv- nents that facilitate 1-to-1 file-to-factory production, ubiquitous sensing, and ity not only in the process of collaborative design, but also during the use and immersive content presentation. In this initial phase, protoSPACE 3.0 consists maintenance of buildings. Hyperbody looks at all stages of the lifecycle of of two main divisions that facilitate the research and education being carried out in the lab, the Interactive Experimentation Lab and the CNC Division. The buildings and at the economical and ecological consequences, focusing on Interactive Experimentation Lab refers to the ubiquitous sensing and immer- the development of new ideas and practical applications for interactive archi- sive content presentation space within the first part of the lab.The Interactive tecture.
    [Show full text]
  • On Architectural and Structural Expressions with Digital Tools
    Chalmers Publication Library New Technology, New Tectonics? - On Architectural and Structural Expressions with Digital Tools This document has been downloaded from Chalmers Publication Library (CPL). It is the author´s version of a work that was accepted for publication in: Tectonics - Making Meaning. Conference Proceedings Citation for the published paper: Nilsson, F. (2007) "New Technology, New Tectonics? - On Architectural and Structural Expressions with Digital Tools". Tectonics - Making Meaning. Conference Proceedings Downloaded from: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/165235 Notice: Changes introduced as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing and formatting may not be reflected in this document. For a definitive version of this work, please refer to the published source. Please note that access to the published version might require a subscription. Chalmers Publication Library (CPL) offers the possibility of retrieving research publications produced at Chalmers University of Technology. It covers all types of publications: articles, dissertations, licentiate theses, masters theses, conference papers, reports etc. Since 2006 it is the official tool for Chalmers official publication statistics. To ensure that Chalmers research results are disseminated as widely as possible, an Open Access Policy has been adopted. The CPL service is administrated and maintained by Chalmers Library. (article starts on next page) NEW TECHNOLOGY, NEW TECTONICS? - ON ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL EXPRESSIONS WITH DIGITAL TOOLS Fredrik Nilsson Fredrik Nilsson, Architect SAR/MSA, PhD, Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology To p ic: Tectonics, the poetics of technology New digital tools are today heavily influencing the working be seen in the distinguished Swedish architectural historian methods and means of expression for architects and engineers.
    [Show full text]