DOCSLIB.ORG

Insights Into Nuclear Architecture and Stochastic Gene

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insights Into Nuclear Architecture and Stochastic Gene INSIGHTS INTO NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE AND STOCHASTIC GENE EXPRESSION THROUGH THE STUDY OF HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOME PAIRING AND TRANSVECTION by Kayla Viets A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 2019 © Kayla Viets 2019 All Rights Reserved Abstract Chromosomes are organized in a complex manner within the nucleus. Their localization relative to activating and repressing nuclear compartments and to other chromosomes can have major effects on gene expression. One important aspect of nuclear architecture involves the physical colocalization, or “pairing” of different alleles of the same gene. Pairing is involved in mammalian processes including genomic imprinting and X-inactivation, but the most well- studied example occurs in Drosophila melanogaster, where homologous chromosomes are paired along their entire lengths throughout interphase. Homologous chromosome pairing in fruit flies facilitates a gene-regulatory phenomenon known as transvection, in which DNA elements on one mutant allele of a gene act between chromosomes on another mutant allele to rescue expression. While homologous chromosome pairing and transvection were first described over 60 years ago, the mechanisms that drive homologous chromosome pairing and transvection across the genome are still unclear. Here, we develop a DNA FISH-based approach to identify button regions across the fly genome that drive pairing. These buttons allow “reconstitution” of genes that are split apart by chromosome rearrangements, suggesting that buttons play a role in maintaining the structural integrity of the genome. Buttons are enriched for topologically associated domains (TADs), indicating that TADs are responsible for homologous chromosome interactions. Using the stochastically expressed spineless (ss) locus as a paradigm, we gain deeper insight into the mechanisms that control transvection. We find that pairing is necessary but not sufficient for ii transvection, and that pairing and transvection are cell-type specific. We also identify the DNA elements required for the separable mechanisms of activation and repression between chromosomes. Furthermore, we find a biological role for transvection in regulating the expression of naturally occurring ss alleles to control photoreceptor patterning. Our work suggests a model in which specialized TADs drive homologous chromosome pairing to facilitate cell-type- specific interchromosomal gene regulation. This work has important implications for our understanding of nuclear architecture-linked diseases including Prader- Willi and Angelman syndromes, breast, renal, and pancreatic cancers, and limb malformations. Primary readers: Xin Chen and Robert J. Johnston, Jr. Secondary readers: Joseph Gall, Karen Reddy, and Yixian Zheng iii Acknowledgements My heartfelt thanks go to all of the members of the Johnston lab who have provided invaluable scientific ideas, experimental advice, and friendship throughout my PhD. I would especially like to thank my PI, Bob Johnston, for his supportive and enthusiastic mentorship, championing of his students, and copious free chocolate. I would also like to thank the many colleagues and collaborators who have contributed to the success of this work by generously providing their feedback, reagents, and time, including Eric Joyce, Ting Wu, Jelena Erceg, Jumana AlHaj Abed, Marco Gallio, James Taylor, Mike Sauria, Max Echterling, Peter DeFord, Andrew Gordus, Claude Desplan, Geraldine Seydoux, Jeff Corden, Judy Kassis, and the Johns Hopkins Tri-Fly labs. Additionally, I would like to thank my thesis committee members, Joe Gall, Karen Reddy, and Yixian Zheng. Their constructive feedback, excellent scientific guidance, and support of my personal and career goals have been essential to my success in graduate school. Finally, I would like to thank my amazing friends and family. My friends have made the last five and a half years in Baltimore some of the best of my life. I am so grateful to have gone through graduate school with such an amazing group of people who support each other through tough scientific times and celebrate each other’s successes. I am also certain that I have the best family around. Without their love, their cheerleading, and their wholehearted support of my career goals throughout my life, I would never have made it as a scientist. I iv am also extremely lucky to have found a wonderful second family in my soon-to- be in-laws, and want to thank them for all their support over the past few years, especially these past few months as I’ve been writing my thesis. Most importantly of all, I want to thank my wonderful fiancé, Alex, for always being there for me through five and a half years of grad school plus five years of long distance. I can’t imagine a better, sweeter, more understanding person to have had by my side for the past five and a half years, and I am so excited to finally start a new adventure together as the Master and the Doctor. v Publications 1) “Probing chromosome pairing and transvection to understand nuclear organization” (Chapter 1) is a review article currently in preparation. 2) “Mechanisms of Photoreceptor Patterning in Vertebrates and Invertebrates” (Chapter 2) is a review article that was published in Trends in Genetics in 2016. 3) “TADs pair homologous chromosomes to promote interchromosomal gene regulation” (Chapter 3) is a research article that is in revision at Developmental Cell. It was also posted to bioRxiv in 2018. 4) “Activating and repressing stochastic gene expression between chromosomes” (Chapter 4) is a research article that is in preparation for submission to Developmental Cell. 5) “The mir-279/996 cluster represses receptor tyrosine kinase signaling to determine cell fates in the Drosophila eye” (Appendix 1) is a research article that was published in Development in 2018. 6) “Regulatory logic driving stable levels of defective proventriculus expression during terminal photoreceptor specification in flies” (Appendix 2) is a research article that was published in Development in 2017. 7) “The insulator protein BEAF-32 is required for Hippo pathway activity in the terminal differentiation of neuronal subtypes” (Appendix 3) is a research article that was published in Development in 2016. vi Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………..ii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………….iv Publications………………………………………………………………………...vi Chapter 1: Introduction: Probing chromosome pairing and transvection to understand nuclear organization……………………………………………….1 1.1: Abstract………………………………………………………………….1 1.2: Introduction……………………………………………………………...2 1.3: Interchromosomal interactions and their role in gene expression...4 1.4: Homologous chromosome pairing in Drosophila provides insight into nuclear organization………………………………………………7 1.5: Homologous chromosome interactions facilitate interchromosomal gene regulation…………………………………..13 1.6: Conclusions……………………………………………………………..22 Chapter 2: Mechanisms of photoreceptor patterning in vertebrates and invertebrates………………………………………………………………………...42 2.1: Abstract…………………………………………………………………..43 2.2: Retinas are patterned in stochastic/regionalized, regionalized, and ordered mosaics…………………………………………………..43 2.3: The unique retinal patterning of different organisms has evolved to suit their environments and behaviors…………………………….48 2.4: The gene regulatory networks controlling PR specification share functional and sequence-level homologs…………………………….48 vii 2.5: Gradients of signaling molecules determine regionalized retinal development…………………………………………………………….54 2.6: Retinal development proceeds through waves of differentiation…..55 2.7: Looping of DNA elements regulates cone subtypes………………...57 2.8: Concluding Remarks……………………………………………………58 2.9: Author Contributions…………………………………………………….65 Chapter 3: TADS pair homologous chromosomes to promote interchromosomal gene regulation……………………………………………...68 3.1: Abstract…………………………………………………………………..68 3.2: Introduction………………………………………………………………69 3.3: Results……………………………………………………………………72 3.4: Discussion………………………………………………………………..86 3.5: Materials and Methods………………………………………………….88 3.6: Author Contributions……………………………………………………110 Chapter 4: Activating and repressing stochastic gene expression between chromosomes……………………………………………………………………….170 4.1: Abstract…………………………………………………………………..170 4.2: Introduction………………………………………………………………171 4.3: Results……………………………………………………………………174 4.4: Discussion……………………………………………………………….184 4.5: Materials and Methods…………………………………………………188 viii 4.6: Author Contributions……………………………………………………201 Chapter 5: Unpublished data……………………………………………………..224 5.1: Button pairing is position-dependent………………………………….224 5.2: Identification of additional buttons across the Drosophila genome…………………………………………………………………..225 5.3: Polycomb mutations affect pairing between copies of ss…………..226 5.4: Investigating the effects of condensin mutations on pairing between ss copies……………………………………………………..227 5.5: Individual DNA element deletions do not affect ss pairing…………228 5.6: Deletion of the interior of the ss TAD reduces pairing between copies of ss……………………………………………………………..228 5.7: ss nuclear localization changes with ss expression state………….229 5.8: Materials and Methods…………………………………………………231 Chapter 6: Conclusions and Future Directions………………………………247 6.1: The study of pairing and transvection provides insights into nuclear organization…………………………………………………..247 6.2: Perspectives and future work…………………………………………249
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transvection in 2012: Site-Specific Transgenes Reveal a Plethora of Trans-Regulatory Effects
    COMMENTARY Transvection in 2012: Site-Specific Transgenes Reveal a Plethora of Trans-Regulatory Effects Judith A. Kassis1 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 In this commentary, Judith Kassis discusses Bateman et al., widespread in the Drosophila genome (Bateman et al. 2012; “Comparing Enhancer Action in cis and in trans” and Mellert Mellert and Truman 2012). and Truman “Transvection is Common Throughout the Dro- Both groups of researchers used the phi-C31 system to in- sophila Genome”, which are published in this issue of GENETICS. tegrate transgenes into specific genomic locations to look at the ability of one transgene to activate the expression of another, N Drosophila, homologous chromosomes are paired in so- greatly increasing our knowledge of trans-interactions and sug- Imatic cells (reviewed in McKee 2004), leading to the oppor- gesting many experiments for the future. However, beyond that, tunity for regulatory DNA on one chromosome to influence their approaches to studying transvection and the questions they the expression of a promoter located on the homologous addressed differ. Bateman et al. (2012) used recombination- chromosome (reviewed in Duncan 2002; Kennison and mediated cassette exchange (Bateman et al. 2006) to insert Southworth 2002). Such trans-regulatory interactions were a simple, defined enhancer, the GMR (which consists of five first reported by Ed Lewis (Lewis 1954) who found that binding sites for the eye transcriptional activator Glass) and allelic complementation between particular mutations within adefined promoter driving the expression of either GFP or the bithorax complex did not occur when the pairing of ho- mCherry into three different chromosomal insertion sites to ad- mologous chromosomes was disrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Scale Organization of the Drosophila Melanogaster Genome
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Multi-Scale Organization of the Drosophila melanogaster Genome Samantha C. Peterson † , Kaylah B. Samuelson † and Stacey L. Hanlon * Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; [email protected] (S.C.P.); [email protected] (K.B.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Interphase chromatin, despite its appearance, is a highly organized framework of loops and bends. Chromosomes are folded into topologically associating domains, or TADs, and each chromosome and its homolog occupy a distinct territory within the nucleus. In Drosophila, genome organization is exceptional because homologous chromosome pairing is in both germline and somatic tissues, which promote interhomolog interactions such as transvection that can affect gene expression in trans. In this review, we focus on what is known about genome organization in Drosophila and discuss it from TADs to territory. We start by examining intrachromosomal organization at the sub-chromosome level into TADs, followed by a comprehensive analysis of the known proteins that play a key role in TAD formation and boundary establishment. We then zoom out to examine interhomolog interactions such as pairing and transvection that are abundant in Drosophila but rare in other model systems. Finally, we discuss chromosome territories that form within the nucleus, resulting in a complete picture of the multi-scale organization of the Drosophila genome. Keywords: Drosophila; topologically associating domain; insulator; pairing; transvection; B chromo- some; cytogenetics Citation: Peterson, S.C.; Samuelson, K.B.; Hanlon, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • And Abdominal-B in Drosqbhilu Melanogaster
    Copyright 0 1995 by the Genetics Society of America and Trans Interactions Between the iab Regulatory Regions and abdominal-A and Abdominal-B in Drosqbhilu melanogaster Jd Eileen Hendrickson and Shigeru Sakonju Department of Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12 Manuscript received August 15, 1994 Accepted for publication November 8, 1994 ABSTRACT The infra-abdominal ( iab) elements in the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster regulate the transcription of the homeotic genesabdominal-A ( abd-A) and Abdominal-B ( Abd-B) in cis. Here we describe two unusual aspects of regulation by the iab elements, revealed by an analysis of an unexpected comple- mentation between mutations in the Abd-B transcription unit and these regulatory regions. First,we find that iab-6 and iab7 can regulate Abd-B in trans. This iab trans regulation is insensitive to chromosomal rearrangements that disrupt transvection effects at the nearby Ubx locus. In addition, we show that a transposed Abd-B transcription unitand promoter on the Ychromosomecan be activatedby iabelements located on the third chromosome. These results suggest that the iab regions can regulate their target promoter located ata distant sitein the genomein a manner that is much less dependent on homologue pairing than other transvection effects.The iab regulatory regionsmay have a very strong affinity for the target promoter, allowing them to interactwith each other despite the inhibitory effectsof chromosomal rearrangements. Second, by generating abd-A mutations on rearrangement chromosomes that break in the iab-7 region, we show that these breaks induce theiab elements to switch their target promoter from Abd-B to abd-A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Role of Cask in Neuronal Morphogenesis
    The Role of CASK in Neuronal Morphogenesis and Brain Size in Drosophila: A Genetic Model of Human Intellectual Disability with Microcephaly Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Tello Vega, Judith Arane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 20:08:46 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630252 THE ROLE OF CASK IN NEURONAL MORPHOGENESIS AND BRAIN SIZE IN DROSOPHILA: A GENETIC MODEL OF HUMAN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY WITH MICROCEPHALY by Judith Arane Tello Vega Copyright © Judith Arane Tello Vega 2018 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN NEUROSCIENCE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2018 1 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Interallelic Transcriptional Enhancement As an in Vivo Measure of Transvection in Drosophila Melanogaster
    INVESTIGATION Interallelic Transcriptional Enhancement as an in Vivo Measure of Transvection in Drosophila melanogaster Geoffrey P. Noble,*,† Patrick J. Dolph,‡ and Surachai Supattapone*,†,1 *Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and †Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, and ‡Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 ABSTRACT Transvection—pairing-dependent interallelic regulation resulting from enhancer action in KEYWORDS trans—occurs throughout the Drosophila melanogaster genome, likely as a result of the extensive somatic transvection homolog pairing seen in Dipteran species. Recent studies of transvection in Drosophila have demonstrated enhancer important qualitative differences between enhancer action in cis vs. in trans, as well as a modest synergistic somatic pairing effect of cis- and trans-acting enhancers on total tissue transcript levels at a given locus. In the present study, GAL4-UAS we identify a system in which cis- and trans-acting GAL4-UAS enhancer synergism has an unexpectedly large quantitative influence on gene expression, boosting total tissue transcript levels at least fourfold relative to those seen in the absence of transvection. We exploit this strong quantitative effect by using publicly available UAS-shRNA constructs from the TRiP library to assay candidate genes for transvection activity in vivo. The results of the present study, which demonstrate that in trans activation by simple UAS enhancers can have large quantitative effects on gene expression in Drosophila, have important new implications for experimental design utilizing the GAL4-UAS system. The nuclear genome is often pictured to function as a linear arrange- which there is widespread physical interaction between maternal and ment of nucleotides grouped into genes and regulatory elements paternal homologous chromosomes (McKee 2004; Metz 1916; Stevens operating more or less locally in cis .
    [Show full text]
  • Transvection Is Common Throughout the Drosophila Genome
    INVESTIGATION Transvection Is Common Throughout the Drosophila Genome David J. Mellert1 and James W. Truman Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147 ABSTRACT Higher-order genome organization plays an important role in transcriptional regulation. In Drosophila, somatic pairing of homologous chromosomes can lead to transvection, by which the regulatory region of a gene can influence transcription in trans.We observe transvection between transgenes inserted at commonly used phiC31 integration sites in the Drosophila genome. When two transgenes that carry endogenous regulatory elements driving the expression of either LexA or GAL4 are inserted at the same integration site and paired, the enhancer of one transgene can drive or repress expression of the paired transgene. These transvection effects depend on compatibility between regulatory elements and are often restricted to a subset of cell types within a given expression pattern. We further show that activated UAS transgenes can also drive transcription in trans. We discuss the implication of these findings for (1) understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie transvection and (2) the design of experiments that utilize site- specific integration. HOUGH much of transcriptional regulation is due to hypomorphic or loss-of-function alleles of a gene exhibit Tregulatory elements that act in cis, relatively near the pairing-dependent complementation. Because of the low transcriptional start site of a gene, long-range and trans frequency of finding such complementary mutations, work interactions can also affect gene regulation (reviewed in on understanding transvection has focused on test cases in- Henikoff and Comai 1998; Dekker 2008). To understand cluding, but not limited to, the yellow (Geyer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis of a New Dominant-Negative Allele of Miranda During CNS Development in Drosophila
    Functional analysis of a new dominant-negative allele of miranda during CNS development in Drosophila Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Vorgelegt von Chieko Takizawa aus Tokyo, Japan Düsseldorf, 2006 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Tag der mündlich Prüfung: 22. Mai 2006 Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. A. Wodarz Prof. Dr. E. Knust 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Generation of cell diversity .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Development of the central nervous system in Drosophila ............................... 2 1.3 Asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts......................................... 4 1.4 Proteins involved in the asymmetric cell division of neuroblasts....................... 5 1.4.1 Basally localized proteins .......................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Apically localized proteins......................................................................... 6 1.4.3 Other proteins involved in asymmetric cell division................................... 8 1.5 Control of daughter cell size asymmetry......................................................... 11 1.6 Asymmetric cell division in other systems: common features and differences. 11 1.6.1 Drosophila
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying Homology Effects Carlo Cogoni
    news & views Unifying homology effects Carlo Cogoni University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161 Rome, Italy. e-mail: [email protected] Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA is a new mechanism, related to other homology-dependent gene silencing phenomena, with implications not only for genome protection against invasive nucleic acids but for genome maintenance and speciation as well. The ability of DNA sequences to pair with A single ancient origin silencing). Based on these characteristics, each other on the basis of sequence homol- Neurospora crassa is haploid during vege- which differ from transvection as it is ogy is well recognized, being the basis for tative growth, whereas in the sexual cycle, observed in Drosophila, meiotic transvec- homologous chromosome pairing during two haploid nuclei of opposite mating tion has been renamed ‘meiotic silencing meiotic prophase. In the past decade, it has type fuse to produce a diploid cell, the by unpaired DNA’ (MSUD). Shiu et al.2 become clear that homology-based interac- zygote. The zygote immediately under- also discovered that MSUD is not tions between nucleic acids, both DNA and goes the two meiotic divisions, followed restricted to a few genes as was previously RNA, can be influential not only in accom- by one mitotic division, to produce hap- believed, but that virtually the entire plishing pairing and recombination during loid ascospores. Thus, the brief period genome is subject to this process. A note- meiosis, but also in regulation of gene after karyogamy and before meiosis is the worthy finding is that a putative RNA- expression at other times in the cell cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Transvection at the Yellow Locus of Drosophila Melanogaster
    Copyright 1999 by the Genetics Society of America An Analysis of Transvection at the yellow Locus of Drosophila melanogaster James R. Morris,* Ji-long Chen,² Stephen T. Filandrinos,* Rebecca C. Dunn,² Ridgely Fisk,* Pamela K. Geyer² and Chao-ting Wu* *Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and ²Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Manuscript received June 8, 1998 Accepted for publication October 5, 1998 ABSTRACT Studies of a wide variety of organisms have shown that homologous sequences can exert a signi®cant impact on each other, resulting in changes in gene sequence, gene expression, chromatin structure, and global chromosome architecture. Our work has focused on transvection, a process that can cause genes to be sensitive to the proximity of a homologue. Transvection is seen at the yellow gene of Drosophila, where it mediates numerous cases of intragenic complementation. In this article, we describe two approaches that have characterized the process of transvection at yellow. The ®rst entailed a screen for mutations that support intragenic complementation at yellow. The second involved the analysis of 53 yellow alleles, obtained from a variety of sources, with respect to complementation, molecular structure, and transcriptional competence. Our data suggest two ways in which transvection may be regulated at yellow: (1) a transcrip- tional mechanism, whereby the ability of an allele to support transvection is in¯uenced by its transcrip- tional competency, and (2) a structural mechanism, whereby the pairing of structurally dissimilar homo- logues results in conformational changes that affect gene expression. HE structure and function of a segment of DNA whose evolution may have been in response to the ap- Tcan be profoundly affected by the presence of ho- pearance of homologous sequences, such as must have mologous sequences (reviewed by Bestor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Transvection in Drosophila Melanogaster Zeste Dependent Transvection in Loss-Of-Function Lamin Mutants
    Södertörn College/University Molecular Cell Biology Transvection in Drosophila Melanogaster zeste dependent transvection in loss-of-function lamin mutants Bachelor thesis, 15 ECTS Spring term 2008 Author: Anneli Pasanen Supervisor: Per Kylsten Abstract Transvection is a widespread phenomenon affecting chromosomal and gene function. There are many examples of epigenetic machineries controlling gene regulation. Nuclear Lamin proteins could have this function. This project shows zeste dependent transvection in loss-of- function lamin mutants in Drosophila melanogaster . The zeste locus encodes a regulatory gene product affecting the expression of other loci, e.g. white . No transvection effect in loss- of-function lamin mutants has so far been shown. The effect of homozygosity versus het- erozygosity of lamin on zeste -dependent transvection at paired white loci was analysed by crossing fruit flies to get homozygous z1; lam D395 individuals. Whether or not the zeste (z1) transvection effect on white was affected by lam D395 loss-of-function mutation was deter- mined by comparing the eye colour phenotypes of double mutant z1; lam D395 females to that of z1/Y ; lam D395 males, which were used as an internal negative control since they are hemizy- gous for zeste that is located on the X chromosome. Females homozygous for z1 and lam D395 displayed the z1-characteristic yellow eye colour. The conclusion is that zeste -dependent transvection effect at white also occurs in lamin mutants. Future research on transvection is needed in order to understand the exact mechanisms of gene regulation. Even gene therapies for some human diseases can take advantage of trans -acting sequences to correct gene expres- sion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Insulators in Transgene Transvection in Drosophila
    Genetics: Early Online, published on April 4, 2019 as 10.1534/genetics.119.302165 The role of insulators in transgene transvection in Drosophila Pawel Piwko1,2, Ilektra Vitsaki1,2, Ioannis Livadaras1 and Christos Delidakis1,2 1: Institute of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Foundation for Research & Technology Hellas. Heraklion, Crete, Greece 70013. 2: Department of Biology, University of Crete. Heraklion, Crete, Greece 70013. the corresponding author's name, office mailing address including street name and number, phone number, and email address: Christos Delidakis IMBB, FORTH 100 N. Plastira St Heraklion 70013 Crete, GREECE tel: +30-2810-391112 email: [email protected] 1 Copyright 2019. Abstract Transvection is the phenomenon where a transcriptional enhancer activates a promoter located on the homologous chromosome. It has been amply documented in Drosophila where homologues are closely paired in most, if not all, somatic nuclei, but it has been known to rarely occur in mammals as well. We have taken advantage of site-directed transgenesis to insert reporter constructs into the same genetic locus in Drosophila and have evaluated their ability to engage in transvection by testing many heterozygous combinations. We find that transvection requires the presence of an insulator element on both homologues. Homotypic trans-interactions between four different insulators can support transvection: the gypsy insulator (GI), Wari, Fab-8 and 1A2; GI and Fab-8 are more effective than Wari or 1A2. We show that in the presence of insulators, transvection displays the characteristics that have been previously described: it requires homologue pairing, but can happen at any of several loci in the genome; a solitary enhancer confronted with an enhancerless reporter is sufficient to drive transcription; it is weaker than the action of the same enhancer-promoter pair in cis and it is further suppressed by cis-promoter competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila As a Genetic Model
    Drosophila as a Genetic Model Praveen V Prasad Asst Prof, Dept. of Botany Sree Narayana College Nattika PG 2nd Sem Drosophila as a model organism • Easy to breed • Tolerant to diverse conditions • short generation time (so several generations can be studied within a few weeks) • It has a high fecundity • Genome is sequenced • Large number genetic mutants are available • Free exchange of research material What is a model organism? • A model organism is a non-human species that is extensively studied to understand particular biological phenomenon, with the expectation that discoveries made in the organism model will provide insight into the workings of other organisms. What makes Model Organisms possible? Common ancestry of all organisms resulting conservation of major aspects of biology Transposon: Jumping genes DNA sequences that move from one location to another location in the genome Discovered by Barbara Mc Clintock, who was studying pigmentation of the kernel in maize Structure of Transposon Transposase gene 31 np inverted terminal repeat How does a transposon get inserted in the genome? Transposase binds to both ends of the transposon, which consist of inverted repeats It also binds to a sequence of DNA that makes up the target site. Some transposases require a specific sequence as their target site; others can insert the transposon anywhere in the genome. Transposons can mutate genes Hybrid Dysgenesis Hybrid dysgenesis refers to the high rate of mutation in germ line cells of Drosophila strains resulting from a cross of males with autonomous P elements (P Strain/P cytotype) and females that lack P elements (M Strain/M cytotype) Transposition only occurs in germ-line cells, because a splicing event needed to make transposase mRNA doesn’t occur in somatic cells Why don’t we see hybrid dysgenesis if we use females of P strain?? The eggs of P strain females contain high amounts of a repressor protein that prevents transcription of the transposase gene.
    [Show full text]