DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910-1933

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910-1933 Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2015 Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910-1933 Andrew J. Simek Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Simek, Andrew J., "Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910-1933" (2015). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4413. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4413 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERN DUCK SICKNESS: AVIAN BOTULISM AND CONSERVATION IN THE BEAR RIVER MARSH, 1910–1933 By Andrew J. Simek A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in History Approved: ______________________ _____________________ David Rich Lewis, PhD Christopher A. Conte, PhD Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ _____________________ Joanna Endter-Wada, PhD Mark McLellan, PhD Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2015 ii Copyright © Andrew J. Simek 2015 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910–1933 by Andrew J. Simek, Master of Science Utah State University, 2015 Major Professor: Dr. David Rich Lewis Program: History This thesis investigates how the Bear River marsh’s protection became a national interest and a cause for conservation in the Progressive Era. The thesis documents how the marsh declined because of irrigation development culminating with an outbreak of avian botulism in 1910, and traces the long process to protect the marshland. The research focused on examining local water development patterns of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, ornithological research in the 1910s, and the national sportsmen’s conservation movement of the 1920s. Upon examination of these events, it becomes clear that a coalition of ornithologists, sportsmen, and policy makers worked together to institute change that affected the marsh. Through showing how groups came together in the past to work for conservation, this research highlights the important role iv that a coalition of groups can have in reshaping how a landscape is viewed and managed. (139 pages) v PUBLIC ABSTRACT Western Duck Sickness: Avian Botulism and Conservation in the Bear River Marsh, 1910–1933 Andrew J. Simek This thesis investigates how the Bear River marsh’s protection became a national interest and a cause for conservation in the Progressive Era. The thesis documents how the marsh declined because of irrigation development culminating with an outbreak of avian botulism in 1910, and traces the long process to protect the marshland. The research focused on examining local water development patterns of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, ornithological research in the 1910s, and the national sportsmen’s conservation movement of the 1920s. Upon examination of these events, it becomes clear that a coalition of ornithologists, sportsmen, and policy makers worked together to institute change that affected the marsh. Through showing how groups came together in the past to work for conservation, this research highlights the important role that a coalition of groups can have in reshaping how a landscape is viewed and managed. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I could not have completed this thesis without the help and support of many people. First, to my wife, Bree Ann Romero, I am grateful for your love and support throughout this endeavor. A great debt is owed to you for pushing me along when I needed it, critiquing my work, and listening to me ramble about ducks for hours on end. I truly could not have done this without you. To my parents, George and Shalley Simek, and my siblings, LaDeanna Simek, Karyn Klebe, Jeff Simek, Eric Simek, and Brad Simek, thank you for supporting and encouraging me to pursue my dreams and take chances. To Jerry and Gayle Romero, for all of your support and providing me with a home and family far from North Dakota, thank you. Special thanks to all of my committee members for staying patient with me throughout this long process. Dr. Joanna Endter-Wada, for introducing me to this topic and to my career in the field of environmental law. Dr. Chris Conte, for challenging and pushing me throughout this work. I am a better writer and critical thinker because of your challenges. To Dr. David Lewis, thank you for all of the support throughout the years. Your help and encouragement kept me interested in finishing my work for a long time. I could not have asked for a better mentor, boss, and friend. Thank you to the History Department at Utah State University for your countless hours of work and willingness to help me along. Particularly, I would like to mention Dr. Colleen O’Neill, who helped me grow academically and professionally, and has helped shape this work. Thanks to the amazing staff that worked with me over the years, especially Diane Buist and Monica Ingold, who always had the answer when I thought I vii had hit a wall. To Carolyn Doyle, thank you for being there for me when I made the move to Logan. I do not think I would have had any clue what was going on in both the school and the community without you. To the staff at Special Collections and Archives at Utah State, Smithsonian Archives, Special Collection at the University of Utah, and the Denver Public Library for helping me locate the sources necessary for this work. To the staff at the S.J. Quinney College of Law Library, University of Utah, for assisting me with my obscure historical legal questions. To professors at the S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, specifically Robert B. Keiter, Robin Kundis Craig, and Jaime Pluene for teaching me so much about environmental law and helping me think critically. Thank you. The research conducted for this work required significant funding and support. I would specifically like to thank the Western Historical Quarterly and the S. George Ellsworth Fellowship for taking a chance on me, and the Charles Redd Center for Western Studies at Brigham Young University for funding my research trips to the Smithsonian Archives and the Denver Public Library. And finally, special thanks to my peers and friends. Thank you for your friendship, discussions, and support. Thanks especially to Joe N. Lamb, Sarah B. Fassmann, Philip M. Lockett, John Brumbaugh, Joe Foster, and Nick Mitrovich. I learned much from each and every one of you. Thank you. Andrew J. Simek viii CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................iii PUBLIC ABSTRACT..................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................1 II. RISE OF “DUCK-DOM”..........................................................................12 III. BEAR RIVER WATERSHED IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................34 IV. WETLAND LABORATORY...................................................................57 V. REFUGE ESTABLISHMENT..................................................................80 VI. CONCLUSION........................................................................................109 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................114 ix LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Bear River Watershed Population 1890–1910..............................................49 x LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Illustration of cycle of avian botulism ..................................................3 2 Photograph of Bear River as seen from headquarters of the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge .......................................................4 3 Map of the Bear River watershed .......................................................16 4 Photograph of Bear River Duck Club clubhouse.................................31 5 Photograph of Bear River Duck Club marshland................................32 6 Map of the Bear River watershed showing hydrodevelopments .........35 7 Photographs of irrigation infrastructure of the Last Chance Canal ....47 8 Photographs of crops, irrigation systems, and mechanization ............51 9 Photograph of duck carcasses at Willard Bay ......................................54 10 Cartoon from Milwaukee Journal ........................................................71 11 Photograph of ducks caught for bird banding .....................................77 12 Herbert Hoover’s endorsement of Izaak Walton League ....................94 13 Cartoon from Outdoor America ...........................................................95 14 Map
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trinity College Bulletin, 1918 (Commencement)
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Trinity College Bulletins and Catalogues (1824 - Trinity Publications (Newspapers, Yearbooks, present) Catalogs, etc.) 1918 Trinity College Bulletin, 1918 (Commencement) Trinity College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/bulletin Recommended Citation Trinity College, "Trinity College Bulletin, 1918 (Commencement)" (1918). Trinity College Bulletins and Catalogues (1824 - present). 67. https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/bulletin/67 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Trinity Publications (Newspapers, Yearbooks, Catalogs, etc.) at Trinity College Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Trinity College Bulletins and Catalogues (1824 - present) by an authorized administrator of Trinity College Digital Repository. <!Tnmmrurrmrut at Wriuity Qtnlltgt HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT June 16, 17, 1918 HONORARII (indicated by affixing their degrees), TRUSTEES, and GUESTS OF TRINITY COLLEGE; PHOTOGRAPHED AT THE ENTRANCE TO WILLIAMS MEMORIAL. Top, Left to right-Flavel S. Luther; Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, Sc.D.; Russell Jordan Coles, Sc.D.; Bishop Paul Matthews, D.D.; George Wharton Pepper, D.C.L.; John Pierpont Morgan, LL.D. Second row- George Shiras, III., Sc. D.; Charles Lathrop Pack, LL.D.; Karl Reiland, D.D.; Bishop Gran_ville Hudson ~herwood, D.D.; Edward Schofield Travers, D.D. Othe!s• tn Two Rows. tn ()rder-C!"tarleR A. johnson; W. S. lluhbard; N. IT. Batchelder, M.A.; <.:harl G. Woodward; Will D a. .., Mu•.B.; .Frank L Ucc:nco; l£:.d r F. W t. r ·n.u.n· c.· ora 0 . <nnmmrurrmrttt nt Wrtutty Qlnlltgt HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT June 16, 17, 1918 TRINITY COMMENCEMENT On the morning of Sunday, June 16, 1918, a memorable event took place on the campus of Trinity College.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    FIFTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1903, to MARCH 3, 1905 FIRST SESSION—November 9, 1903, to December 7, 1903 SECOND SESSION—December 7, 1903, to April 28, 1904 THIRD SESSION—December 5, 1904, to March 3, 1905 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 5, 1903, to March 19, 1903 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—WILLIAM P. FRYE, of Maine SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES G. BENNETT, of New York SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—DANIEL M. RANSDELL, of Indiana SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JOSEPH G. CANNON, 2 of Illinois CLERK OF THE HOUSE—ALEXANDER MCDOWELL, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—HENRY CASSON, of Wisconsin DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—FRANK B. LYON, of New York POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—J. C. MCELROY ALABAMA Hugh A. Dinsmore, Fayetteville Thomas M. Patterson, Denver SENATORS John S. Little, Greenwood REPRESENTATIVES Charles C. Reid, Morrillton John T. Morgan, Selma John F. Shafroth, 9 Denver Joseph T. Robinson, Lonoke 10 Edmund W. Pettus, Selma R. Minor Wallace, Magnolia Robert W. Bonynge, Denver REPRESENTATIVES Herschel M. Hogg, Telluride George W. Taylor, Demopolis CALIFORNIA At Large–Franklin E. Brooks, Ariosto A. Wiley, Montgomery SENATORS Colorado Springs Henry D. Clayton, Eufaula George C. Perkins, Oakland Sydney J. Bowie, Anniston Thomas R. Bard, Hueneme CONNECTICUT 4 Charles W. Thompson, Tuskegee REPRESENTATIVES SENATORS J. Thomas Heflin, 5 Lafayette James N. Gillett, Eureka Orville H. Platt, Meriden John H. Bankhead, Fayette Theodore A. Bell, Napa Joseph R. Hawley, Hartford John L. Burnett, Gadsen 6 Victor H. Metcalf, Oakland REPRESENTATIVES William Richardson, Huntsville Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • K:\Fm Andrew\51 to 60\58.Xml
    FIFTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1903, to MARCH 3, 1905 FIRST SESSION—November 9, 1903, to December 7, 1903 SECOND SESSION—December 7, 1903, to April 28, 1904 THIRD SESSION—December 5, 1904, to March 3, 1905 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 5, 1903, to March 19, 1903 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—WILLIAM P. FRYE, of Maine SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES G. BENNETT, of New York SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—DANIEL M. RANSDELL, of Indiana SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JOSEPH G. CANNON, 2 of Illinois CLERK OF THE HOUSE—ALEXANDER MCDOWELL, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—HENRY CASSON, of Wisconsin DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—FRANK B. LYON, of New York POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—J. C. MCELROY ALABAMA Hugh A. Dinsmore, Fayetteville Thomas M. Patterson, Denver SENATORS John S. Little, Greenwood REPRESENTATIVES Charles C. Reid, Morrillton John T. Morgan, Selma John F. Shafroth, 9 Denver Joseph T. Robinson, Lonoke 10 Edmund W. Pettus, Selma R. Minor Wallace, Magnolia Robert W. Bonynge, Denver REPRESENTATIVES Herschel M. Hogg, Telluride George W. Taylor, Demopolis CALIFORNIA At Large–Franklin E. Brooks, Ariosto A. Wiley, Montgomery SENATORS Colorado Springs Henry D. Clayton, Eufaula George C. Perkins, Oakland Sydney J. Bowie, Anniston Thomas R. Bard, Hueneme CONNECTICUT 4 Charles W. Thompson, Tuskegee REPRESENTATIVES SENATORS J. Thomas Heflin, 5 Lafayette James N. Gillett, Eureka Orville H. Platt, Meriden John H. Bankhead, Fayette Theodore A. Bell, Napa Joseph R. Hawley, Hartford John L. Burnett, Gadsen 6 Victor H. Metcalf, Oakland REPRESENTATIVES William Richardson, Huntsville Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophy Shots: Early North American Photographs of Nonhuman Animals and the Display of Masculine Prowess
    S & A 13,1_f4_12-31 5/12/05 10:49 AM Page 13 Matthew Brower1 Trophy Shots: Early North American Photographs of Nonhuman Animals and the Display of Masculine Prowess ABSTRACT This essay examines the relationship between the display of non- human animal trophies and masculinity through an analysis of pro- gressive-era American wildlife photography. In the 1890s, North American animal photographers began circulating their images in sporting journals and describing their practice as a form of hunt- ing. These camera hunters exhibited their photographs as proof of sportsmanship, virility, and hunting prowess. George Shiras III (1859-1942) published his first non- human animal photograph in the September 8 edi- tion of Forest and Stream (Shiras, 1892, p. 203). The photograph, entitled Doe, was a roundel depicting a female deer crossing a stream. The doe’s head is pointed toward the viewer, and her eyes are “riv- eted” upon the camera (Shiras). The ears of the deer are cocked toward the viewer, perhaps responding to the sound of the picture’s being taken. The deer’s instinctive response to a potential threat—freezing with her head up to evaluate—has composed her for the image. The lack of motion that makes the deer invisible to predators has made her visible to the camera. This pose, combined with the round frame, Society & Animals 13:1 © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2005 S & A 13,1_f4_12-31 5/12/05 10:49 AM Page 14 gives the image the feeling of being taken through the scope of a rifle. This sense is not inappropriate; the image is an image of prey.
    [Show full text]
  • When Teddy Came to Town Tyler R. Tichelaar
    When Teddy Came to Town a novel Tyler R. Tichelaar Marquette Fiction Marquette, Michigan When Teddy Came to Town Copyright © 2018 by Tyler R. Tichelaar All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Inquiries should be addressed to: Marquette Fiction 1202 Pine Street Marquette, MI 49855 www.MarquetteFiction.com ISBN-13: 978-0-9962400-5-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018903135 Printed in the United States of America Cover Photo: Greg Kretovic Author Photo: Greg Casperson Cover and Interior Design: Larry Alexander, Superior Book Productions www.SuperiorBookProductions.com “To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson Principal Characters Fictional Characters Matthew Newman—Reporter for the Empire Sentinel of New York City and former Marquette resident. Delia Newman Richardson—Matthew Newman’s married sister who lives in Marquette. Roger Richardson—Delia Richardson’s husband. Lydia Richardson—Roger and Delia Richardson’s daughter. Rowena Richardson Robillard—Roger’s sister. Reginald Robillard—Rowena’s husband, of the Philadelphia Robillards. Martha—The Richardsons’ servant. Mrs. Honeywell—The Richardsons’ cook. Lysander Blackmore—Lydia Richardson’s fiancé. Richard Blackmore—Father to Lysander, deceased at time of novel. Joe Sweet—Boyhood camping companion to Matthew Newman and George Shiras. Madeleine Henning—Friend in youth to Matthew, Delia, and Roger; she drowned in Lake Superior during a boating excursion on July 4, 1876.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending the Master Race
    Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of madison grant $EFENDINGß THEß-ASTERß2ACE jonathan peter spiro 2009 Contents Madison Grant: The Consensus ix Introduction xi part i. the evolution of scientific racism Chapter 1. Big-Game Hunter 3 Chapter 2. The Bronx Zoo 31 Chapter 3. From Conservation to Preservation 52 Chapter 4. Wildlife Management 73 Chapter 5. From Mammals to Man 88 Chapter 6. The Eugenics Creed 117 part ii. conserving the nordics Chapter 7. The Passing of the Great Race 143 Chapter 8. Grant’s Disciples 167 Chapter 9. Creating the Refuge 196 Chapter 10. Culling the Herd 234 Chapter 11. Saving the Redwoods 266 part iii. extinction Chapter 12. Nordic and Anti-Nordic 297 Chapter 13. The Empire Crumbles 328 Chapter 14. The Ever-Widening Circle: The Third Reich 355 Epilogue. The Passing of the Great Patrician 384 Appendix A: Organizations Served by Madison Grant in an Executive Capacity 391 Appendix B: The Interlocking Directorate of Wildlife Conservation 392 Appendix C: Selected Members of the Advisory Council of the ECUSA 394 Appendix D: Selected Members of the Interlocking Directorate of Scientific Racism 395 Key to Archival Collections 397 Notes 401 Works Cited 443 Index 467 Madison Grant The Consensus 1940s “The high priest of racialism in America.” Gunnar Myrdal 1950s “Intellectually the most important nativist in recent American history.” John Higham 1960s “The nation’s most influential racist.” Mark Haller 1970s “The dean of American racists.” Ethel W. Hedlin 1980s “The most famous of the new scholars of race.” Page Smith 1990s “One of the nation’s foremost racists.” Steven Selden 2000s “The great patriarch of scientific racism.” Matthew Guterl Introduction At the conclusion of World War II, the American Mili- tary Tribunal at Nuremberg indicted Major General Karl Brandt of the Waffen-SS for conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Devoted To—Base Ball—Bicycling—Guns—Gunning
    1h DEVOTED TO—BASE BALL—BICYCLING—GUNS—GUNNING VOLUME 30, NO. 15. PHILADELPHIA, JANUARY 1, 1898. PRICE, FIVE CENTS. _ SAM " Hello! Young Fellow. Happy New Year to you. You seem well equipped for sport." MASTER 1898 <( Yes. I have a Base Ball Outfit and a Bicycle and several Guns and lots of other things, but I want ©Sporting Life,© I©ve called to pay my subscription for the year." FATHER TIME "Ah! How soon they learn in this up-to-date age. It©s only fifteen years ajj| when ©Sporting Life© was a baby. Now it©s a giant." Jan* 1 ripening April 15 there won©t be much time for mium will write us we will do our Southern teaaig trips or spiing exhibition games. best to fu-nish the desired article on What strange -shifts base ball does make! SPORTING LIFE While Cincinnati welcomes Elmer Smith back into reasonable terms. the fold it bids Bill Rhines a second last fare A WEEKLY JOURNAL well. Devoted to Pitcher McPartlin has hgd©a successful opera , P THE PROPER VIEW. tion performed for a tumor in his eye at the BASEBALL, BICYCLING, SHOOT. DESERVING OFJELPFDL SYMPATHY, Manhattan Eye and Ear Hospital in New York ING, BILLIARDS, Etc. Mr. Preedinan Favors Modification City. The assignment of the Overman of the Brush Resolution. J. W. Gannon. who was elected captain of the Special to "Sporting Life." I,ehigh team for the coming season, has entered Wheel Company, the famous manu Yale, and will be seen with the Yale team next Trade<|m»rked by the Sporting Life Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt V. Newett: the Libel Trial of 1913 James Mccommons Northern Michigan University, [email protected]
    Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region Volume 6 Article 2 2018 Roosevelt v. Newett: The Libel Trial of 1913 James McCommons Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/upper_country Recommended Citation McCommons, James (2018) "Roosevelt v. Newett: The Libel Trial of 1913," Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region: Vol. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://commons.nmu.edu/upper_country/vol6/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Peer-Reviewed Series at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region by an authorized editor of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. McCommons: Roosevelt v. Newett: The Libel Trial of 1913 Roosevelt v. Newett: The Libel Trial of 1913 James McCommons Imagine this unlikely scenario. A small, weekly newspaper in Michigan denounces a former U.S. president as an intemperate drunk. The president, possibly the most well-known personage in the world, sues the paper and its editor for defamation. Weeks later, the ex- president, most of his former cabinet, personal physicians, bodyguards, eminent personalities and relatives board a train in New York and travel to the remote Upper Peninsula to defend the president’s honor. In an ornate courtroom, these famous folk testify that the president drank lightly at state dinners and never uttered an oath saltier than “By Godfrey.” The president takes the stand, declaring he’s never been intoxicated in his life and calls the accusations “scurrilous.” Reporters from the New York Times, the London Times, and major wire services report every word.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Stephen Collins Foster His World and Music
    Understanding Stephen Collins Foster His World and Music by Joanne O’Connell B.A., University of Miami, 1971 M.A., Florida International University, 2002 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 University of Pittsburgh School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Joanne O’Connell It was defended on March 23, 2007 and approved by Dr. Van Beck Hall, Professor, Department of History Dr. Peter Karsten, Professor, Department of History Dr. Deane L. Root, Professor, Department of Music Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Edward Muller, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright by Joanne O’Connell 2007 iii Understanding Stephen Collins Foster, His World and Music Joanne O’Connell, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 This dissertation is an explanation of the life and music of the American composer Stephen Collins Foster in terms of his historical world. Foster captured the essential dynamics of the antebellum mind and heart, which accounted for the immense popularity of his music even during the composer’s lifetime. Consequently, by placing Foster and his music within the historical context of his own antebellum society, culture, and history, I sought explanations for the following: the function of sentimentality in Foster’s tear-inducing parlor songs and in his blackface plantation songs; the Copperhead, anti-Lincoln politics of the Foster family; Foster’s non-companionate marriage to the high-tempered
    [Show full text]
  • Capital, Labor and Lawyers: the Changing Roles and Rising Influence of the Pittsburgh Bar During the Gilded Age
    CAPITAL, LABOR AND LAWYERS: THE CHANGING ROLES AND RISING INFLUENCE OF THE PITTSBURGH BAR DURING THE GILDED AGE Ron Schuler* ABSTRACT As lawyers in an American frontier city, Pittsburgh’s 19th century lawyers were accustomed, perhaps to a greater degree than their cousins in the large Eastern cities, to being involved with business. Thomas Mellon, founder of the Mellon banking empire, was a lawyer and judge who embodied the entrepreneurial spirit of the Pittsburgh lawyer; and following the Civil War, with the rise of Pittsburgh’s industrial power, business-oriented lawyers such as Mellon would be a model for the new corporation lawyer in Pittsburgh—functioning as the intimate business advisor and social peer of tycoons such as Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick and George Westinghouse. Inevitably, labor organized into unions, in response to the corporatization of capital, and Pittsburgh’s first labor lawyer, William Brennen—in a sort of mirror image of the business-oriented corporation lawyers—entered the law after having experienced the inner-workings of a steel mill and participated in the union movement. Pittsburgh’s corporation lawyers, however, maintained capital’s upper hand against labor—a fact for which the Homestead Strike of 1892 is emblematic—and became among the most influential lawyers in the nation. * Managing Member of the Pittsburgh Office of Spilman, Thomas & Battle, PLLC. Portions of this article are excerpted from an unpublished work-in-progress, commissioned by the Allegheny County Bar Association, tentatively entitled The Steel Bar: Reinventions of the Legal Profession in an American City of Industry and Commerce, 1788—Present.
    [Show full text]