Reference Offer for Interconnection (RIO) of Vodafone Qatar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL Mr. Jeff Derouen Executive Director Public
Mary K. Keyer AT&T Kentucky T 502-582-8219 General Attorney 601 W. Chestnut Street F 502-582-1573 Kentucky Legal Department Room 407 [email protected] Louisville, KY 40203 September 16,2010 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL Mr. Jeff Derouen Executive Director Public Service Commission 21 1 Sower Boulevard P.O. Box 615 Frankfort, KY 40602 Re: Petition of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Kentucky for Arbitration of Interconnection Agreement With Sprint Spectrum L.P., Nextel West Corp., and NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners KPSC 20 I0-0006 1 Dear Mr. Derouen: Enclosed for filing in the above-captioned case are the original and ten (10) copies of Rebuttal Testimony of Frederick C. Christensen, P. L. (Scot) Ferguson, James W. Hamiter, J. Scott McPhee, and Patricia H. Pellerin on behalf of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., d/b/a AT&T Kentucky. A copy of the affidavit of Frederick C. Christensen is being filed today. The original affidavit will be filed in the near future. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Mary K. Keyer Enclosures cc: Parties of Record 850513 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - PSC 201 0-00061 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served on the following individuals by mailing a copy thereof, this 16th day of September 201 0. Honorable Douglas F Brent Attorney at Law Stoll Keenon Ogden, PLLC 2000 PNC Plaza 500 W Jefferson Street Louisville, KY 40202-2828 William R. Atkinson Douglas C. Nelson Sprint Nextel 3065 Akers Mill Rd., S.E. Mailstop GAATLD0704 Atlanta, GA 30339 Joseph M. -
Jordan Mini-Case Study: Dispute Resolution and Consensus Building in Interconnection
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION TELECOMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT BUREAU Document: 11 GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM FOR REGULATORS Geneva, Switzerland, 8-9 December 2003 INTERCONNECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION MINI CASE STUDY 2003: JORDAN Dispute Resolution and Consensus Building in Interconnection International Telecommunication Union (ITU) JJoorrddaann MMiinnii--CCaassee SSttuuddyy 22000033 DDiissppuuttee RReessoolluuttiioonn aanndd CCoonnsseennssuuss BBuuiillddiinngg iinn IInntteerrccoonnnneeccttiioonn International Telecommunication Union This mini case study was conducted by Robert Bruce and Rory Macmillan of Debevoise & Plimpton, London U.K. with the active participation of country collaborators Massoun Shocair and Muna Nijem. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of ITU, its members or the government of Jordan. The authors wish to express their sincere appreciation to the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission for its support in the preparation of this mini case study. This is one of five mini case studies on interconnection dispute resolution undertaken by ITU. Further information can be found on the web site at http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/treg. © 2003 ITU International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Jordan Mini-Case Study: Dispute Resolution and Consensus Building in Interconnection I. Introduction to the Market, Regulatory Regime and Interconnection Jordan has a population of about 5.3 million and a GDP of about JD 6.6 billion (JD 1.00 = US$ 1.41). It has nearly 675,000 fixed lines, a teledensity of about 12.7%, and about 1,220,000 mobile subscribers, a penetration rate of about 22.9%. Jordan’s telecommunications sector has been undergoing a staged pace of liberalization since its Telecommunications Law (the “Law”) was enacted in 1995 and amended in 20021. -
FTC Robocalls Summit Transcript
1 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 3 4 5 ROBOCALLS: ALL THE RAGE 6 AN FTC SUMMIT 7 8 9 Thursday, October 18, 2012 10 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 11 United States Federal Trade Commission 12 Conference Center 13 600 New Jersey Avenue, Northwest 14 Washington, D.C. 20001 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Welcome: 3 Jon Leibowitz, Chairman.................4 4 5 The Network: 6 Steven Bellovin.........................12 7 Henning Schulzrinne.....................17 8 9 The Industry: 10 Roberto Anguizola, Moderator............43 11 12 The Law: 13 Lois Greisman, Moderator................75 14 15 Caller ID Spoofing And Call Authentication Technology: 16 Kati Daffan, Moderator.................119 17 18 Data Mining and Anomaly Detection: 19 David Belanger.........................181 20 21 Call-Blocking Technology: 22 Bikram Bandy, Moderator ...............199 23 24 Announcement: 25 David Vladeck..........................249 3 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 - - - - - 3 WELCOME 4 MS. DAFFAN: We can get started now. Thank 5 you all for your patience. I am thrilled to be kicking 6 off this meeting today. Sorry it took us a little 7 while to get going, but we are all very excited that 8 you're here and that you're listening on the Webcast, 9 if that's where you are. 10 I have to start off, unfortunately, with a 11 few administrative things. For those of you who are 12 here in person, you got a nametag when you came in. -
Emergency Number Systems Board ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Emergency Number Systems Board 99--11--11 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 MARTIN O’MALLEY ANTHONY G. BROWN GREG HERSHBERGER GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOR SECRETARY - DPSCS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services Placeholder for Letter to Sec Maynard Emergency Number Systems Board 115 Sudbrook Lane – Suite 201, Pikesville, Maryland 21208-4199 (410) 585-3015 • FAX (410) 764-4136 • www.dpscs.state.md.us/ensb/ STATE OF MARYLAND MARTIN O’MALLEY GOVERNOR March 25, 2014 ANTHONY G. BROWN LT. GOVERNOR Secretary Greg Hershberger GREG HERSHBERGER SECRETARY Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services PATRICIA DONOVAN 300 East Joppa Road - Suite 1000 DEPUTY SECRETARY ADMINISTRATION Baltimore, MD 21286 ANTHONY MYERS CHAIR GORDON DEANS Dear Secretary Hershberger: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JUMARY WEST FISCAL COORDINATOR I am pleased to provide you with the Annual Report of the Emergency SCOTT ROPER Number Systems Board (ENSB or Board) for Fiscal Year 2013. The Board TRAINING COORDINATOR has convened monthly, and more frequently in sub-committees, to consider a variety of 9-1-1 related issues and projects. The attached report outlines the collective efforts of the Board and the larger 9-1-1 community in making Maryland a safer place for its residents, businesses, and visitors. Maryland continues to benefit from an effective 9-1-1 system. Recent Board statewide efforts include working with Verizon, Maryland PSAP personnel, and the Maryland Public Service Commission to review the implementation of policies and standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission and ENSB to minimize disruptions to 9-1-1 service caused by power outages and network failures. -
Report on the Technical Feasibility of Implementing a Video Relay Service in Canada
Report on the Technical Feasibility of Implementing a Video Relay Service in Canada Disclaimer: This report was commissioned by the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (“the Commission”) in November 2012 and was completed by Groupe Consult-Com Techno. This report presents some of the technical considerations for video relay service (VRS) and covers topics such as call routing, technical standards, and offers an architectural overview of available VRS solutions. While the authors have endeavored to ensure that the information is current and accurate at the time of writing, significant changes may be occurring or have occurred in some areas by the time of publication. This report reflects the research, views and recommendations of the authors, and should not be construed as representing any views of the Commission. Table of Contents Preface................................................................................................................................ iii About the authors ............................................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Situation overview .............................................................................................................. 2 State of technologies ....................................................................................................... 2 Canadian characteristics.....................................................................................................