DOCSLIB.ORG

Juneau Small Cruise Ship Infrastructure Master Plan 2020 Acknowledgments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juneau Small Cruise Ship Infrastructure Master Plan 2020 Acknowledgments n.com esig -d us rv o .c w w w Corvus Design Landscape Architecture • Planning • Industrial Design Juneau Small Cruise Ship Infrastructure Master Plan 2020 Acknowledgments PORT OF JUNEAU STAFF PLANNING TEAM Carl Uchytil, Port Director PND Engineers, Project Lead, Marine Facilities & Erich Schaal, Port Engineer Uplands Planning and Engineering Matthew Creswell, Harbormaster McDowell Group, Economic and Market Assessment Corvus Design, Site Inventory and Uplands Planning DOCKS AND HARBORS BOARD NorthWind Architects, Architecture Don Etheridge, Chair Board Mark Ridgway, Chair Ops Jim Becker, Vice Chair Board Bob Wostmann, Vice Chair Ops Chris Dimond Steven Guignon Annette Smith James Houck David Larkin CRUISE LINES UnCruise Alaskan Dream Lindblad The Boat Company American Cruise Lines Windstar Ponant (CLAA) Silversea (CLAA) This page has been left intentionally blank Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................1 Planning Context ................................................................................................................................................2 Preferred Site & Facilities ...................................................................................................................................2 MARKETING ASSESSMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS ....................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................3 Juneau Small Cruise Ship Market ......................................................................................................................4 Cruise Line Perspective ......................................................................................................................................9 Infrastructure Considerations ..........................................................................................................................11 Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................................15 SITE INVENTORY ...................................................................................................................................17 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................17 Preliminary Sites – Inventory & Assessment ............................................................................................ 19 National Guard Dock ........................................................................................................................................19 Intermediate Vessel Float ................................................................................................................................19 Port Field Office ...............................................................................................................................................20 Inside Cruise Ship Terminal ..............................................................................................................................20 Aurora Harbor ..................................................................................................................................................21 Norway Point....................................................................................................................................................21 Preferred Sites – Inventory & Assessment ............................................................................................... 22 Little Rock Dump ..............................................................................................................................................22 Gold Creek Subport (NCLH/USCG) ..................................................................................................................23 Douglas Harbor ................................................................................................................................................24 Harris Harbor ...................................................................................................................................................25 Auke Bay Marine Station .................................................................................................................................26 NOAA/Seadrome..............................................................................................................................................27 Capability Matrix ..................................................................................................................................... 28 MASTER PLANS OF PREFERRED SITES ............................................................................................31 Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................31 Auke Bay Marine Station ......................................................................................................................... 34 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................34 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................34 Little Rock Dump ..................................................................................................................................... 36 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................36 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................36 Douglas Harbor ....................................................................................................................................... 38 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................38 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................38 Harris Harbor .......................................................................................................................................... 40 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................40 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................40 Gold Creek Subport (NCLH / USCG) ......................................................................................................... 42 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................42 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................42 PREFERRED SELECTED SITE – NOAA/SEADROME .........................................................................43 Concept Description ........................................................................................................................................43 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................................................48 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................................................................49 Executive Summary Juneau has long been a cruise ship destination for Small cruise ships calling to port in Juneau are those sailing to Alaska, with the city being a primary typically in the 50- to 100-passenger range but, by port of call. While the Alaska market for large cruise definition, can carry up to 350 passengers. Typical ships has grown, there is increased demand for a small cruise ships have passenger-to-crew ratios of more intimate Alaskan experience on small cruise between 3-to-1 and 2-to-1. In 2019, 21 small cruise ships. The primary focus for many port communities ships, operated by eight cruise companies, made a in Southeast Alaska is to provide facilities and total of 272 calls to Juneau, bringing an estimated services for larger cruise ships. As the tourism passenger count of 18,400. These passengers market for small cruise ships gains popularity, it is provide valuable income to the City and Borough essential to concentrate on infrastructure growth to of Juneau (CBJ), with an estimated 2019 spending accommodate this industry. of $9.2 million. Meeting this industry’s needs will promote the continued visitation to Juneau The Juneau Small Cruise Ship Infrastructure Master and provide a positive visitor experience for their Plan will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Office of the Lieutenant Governor Memorandum
    Byron Mallott Lieutenant Governor 530 West 7th Ave, Suite 1700 State Capitol Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Juneau, Alaska 99811 907.269.7460 907.465.3520 [email protected] WWW.L TGOV.ALASKA.GOV OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ALASKA MEMORANDUM TO: Shellene Hutter Department of Fish and Game FROM: Scott Meriwether, Office of the Lieutenant Governor Cfr' 465.4081 DATE: May 18, 2018 RE: Filed Permanent Regulations: Board of Fisheries Board of Fisheries Regulations re: Jan 15 - 23, 2018 Sitka Meeting: Southeast and Yakutat Finfish Fisheries (5 AAC 01.670 - 5 AAC 77.683) Attorney General File: JU201720512(Part1) Regulation Filed: 5/18/2018 Effective Date: 6/17/2018 Print: 226,July 2018 cc with enclosures: Linda Miller, Department of Law Judy Herndon, LexisNexis ORDER CERTIFYING THE CHANGES TO REGULATIONS OF THE ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES The attached 30 pages of regulations, dealing with finfish fisheries in southeast Alaska are certified to be a correct copy of the regulation changes that the Alaska Board of Fisheries adopted at its January 15-23 meeting in Sitka, Alaska, under the authority of AS 16.05.251 and after compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act (AS 44.62), specifically including notice under AS 44.62.190 and 44.62.200 and opportunity for public comment under AS 44.62.210. This action is not expected to require an increased appropriation. On the record, in considering public comments, the Alaska Board of Fisheries paid special attention to the cost to private persons of the regulatory action being taken. The regulation changes described in this order take effect on the 30th day after they have been filed by the lieutenant governor, as provided in AS 44.62.180.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report
    Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report CHANNEL DEEPENING FOR NAVIGATION ALASKA D l STR l CT CORPS OF ENGl NEEWS NOVEMBER 1977 FEASIBILITY REPORT APPENDIX A - ECONOMICS GASTINEAU CHANNEL, ALASKA PRESENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Natural and human resources and developmental trends of the study area are presented to provide a general understanding of their relation to the problems and needs of the area and to establish a "most probable future" for the purpose of benefit and impact analysis. Of particular importance is the role waterways play in the social and economic well-being of the comunity. All waterborne traffic to and from Juneau must use Gastineau Channel. The channel southeast of Juneau is navigable by all classes of vessels, but the northern portion from Juneau-Douglas bridge to Fritz Cove is navigable only by shallow- draft vessels at selected tide levels. A shoaled reach, south of Juneau Airport, is navigable only at high tide and even then, only with current know1 edge of channel conditions. These restrictions cause the majority of traffic to take the longer route around Douglas Island, resulting in increased operating time and costs, a reduction in the navigation season due to adverse weather conditions, and the added risk of life and property because of the longer voyage through unprotected waters. TRIBUTARY AREA Gastineau Channel, a narrow strait about 16 miles long that separates Doug1 as Is1 and from the mainland of southeastern A1 aska, connects Stephens Passage on the east with Fritz Cove on the west. Although much of Southeast Alaska is a general tributary area, the Juneau-Douglas area is the principal contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Treadwell Mining Complex
    Treadwell Mining Complex HISTORIC RESOURCES AND SITE SURVEY REPORT City and Borough of Juneau Wayne Jensen: Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. August 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Foreword Introduction Historical Significance Historical Context Architectural Summary Site and Vicinity Maps Treadwell Historic District Survey 1. 5- Stamp Mill 2. 300 Mill and Vanner Room 3. Central Power Plant 4. Tennis Court 5. Superintendent’s House 6. Assistant Superintendent’s House 7. Treadwell Plaza 8. Barn 9. Store and Butcher Shop 10. New Office Building 11. Assay Office 12. School House 13. Wharf and Warehouses 14. Pump House 15. Boarding House 16. Dormitories 17. Treadwell Club 18. Natatorium 19. Cottages (Treadwell Heights) 20. Cottages (Campbell Hill) 21. Central Hoist and Crushing Plant 22. 240 Mill 23. Treadwell Hoist 24. Blacksmith Shop 25. Glory Hole 26. Tanks 27. Water System (Treadwell Ditch) 28. Cave-in Site Bibliography Treadwell Mining Complex Page 2 Historic Resources and Site Survey Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was prepared on behalf of the City and Borough of Juneau, Department of Community Development by Wayne Jensen, Architect of Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. and based in part on previous work completed by Architect Gary Gillette. Funding for this project and publication was provided by (XXX). Current photos by Wayne Jensen Historical photos provided courtesy of the Alaska State Historical Library and the Juneau Douglas City Museum. Historical drawings of the Treadwell Mining Complex were provided courtesy of the Alaska State Historical Library, AJT Mining Properties, and the City and Borough of Juneau. City and Borough of Juneau Historic Resources Advisory Council Gerald Gotschall, Chair Steven Winkler , Vice Chair Christine Crooks, Secretary Marie Darlin Monica Bethers Gary Gillette Myra Gilliam Leslie Daugherty Shauna McMahon Treadwell Historic Preservation and Restoration Society, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Places Readers to Settle for Just the Story, Leaving the Richard Carstensen Land of Large Bears to Its Furry Denizens
    News and Views from Discovery Southeast Spring 2002 and the peaks, streams and bays. He asked his Secret Places readers to settle for just the story, leaving the Richard Carstensen Land of Large Bears to its furry denizens. It was Three friends once walked for ten days through a land so rich that small almost a fair trade; the essay was a masterpiece. bears detoured in fear of their propertied elders. Let’s call it the Land of The three friends reviewed the draft and Large Bears. begged the author to purge all place names and That country burned permanently into the friends’ hearts. Except to directions. To their surprise, he accepted. I hope their closest acquaintances, others who understood the fragility of wild- his decision is noted not only by other nature ness, they never spoke of the long walk. They knew those ten wild days writers, but by earth stewards everywhere. were unrepeatable. Backcountry is shrinking. The press of humanity on Those who advertise wild land for whatever rea- Manhattan and its satellites can’t be quarantined. son — to fill a kayak trip or cruiseship, to hold A few years later one of the three friends caught wind of a book chainsaws at bay, to prop up sagging timber or project. A writer and photographer planned a trek into the Land of Large fishing economies, to instruct us from the ecol- Bears! Shocked, he asked to join the expedition, hoping to convince the ogy of untrammeled places, or simply in purest journalists that to such a place their art was costly.
    [Show full text]
  • Auke Lake Watershed Assessment Auke Lake Watershed in Juneau, Alaska
    Auke Lake Watershed Assessment Auke Lake Watershed in Juneau, Alaska Prepared by the Juneau Watershed Partnership April 2009 The Juneau Watershed Partnership (JWP) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to promote watershed integrity in the City and Borough of Juneau through education, research, and communication while encouraging sustainable use and development. Statement of Need and Purpose Situated approximately 12 miles north of Juneau, Alaska, Auke Lake is an anadromous system supporting coho, sockeye, pink and chum salmon, as well as cutthroat trout, rainbow trout and Dolly Varden char (Bethers, 1996). The Auke Lake watershed is a popular recreational area for Juneau residents, serves as a backdrop for the University of Alaska-Southeast campus, is a growing residential area, and hosts a NOAA/NMFS research facility on its outlet. The purpose of this watershed assessment is to compile existing data into a single document, in order to identify data gaps and provide recommendations for further studies. This document also provides the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) and the public with an overview of the current condition of the Auke Lake watershed, and outlines management recommendations to ensure the sustainability of fish habitat and recreational and aesthetic values. The results of this assessment should be used to guide watershed management of this valuable lake system. The intention is that this report will be utilized by CBJ staff, the CBJ Planning Commission, Wetlands Review Board, the City Assembly, as well as Juneau residents and local, state and federal agencies involved in conservation and land management decisions within the Auke Lake watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Geology of Admiralty Island Alaska
    Reconnaissance Geology of Admiralty Island Alaska LI By E. H. LATHRAM, J. S. POMEROY, H. C. BERG, and R. A. LONEY ^CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN 1181-R ^ A reconnaissance study of a geologically -t complex* area in southeast-..--.. Alaska.... UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary X1 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Y. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________---_-__-_-__--__-_ _..___.__ Rl Introduction... _______ __-_____-_---_-_ __________ ______ 2 M Geography______________---__---___-_-__--_-_---_ ________ 2 ;._. Previous investigations---..-. ________________________________ 4 Present investigations..-______-_--__ _ ____________________ 6 ^ Tectonic aspects of the geology__-_-__--_--__-_-_______._____.____ 7 Stratigraphy...... _____-___-__--_^---^---^ ----------------------- 10 "-< Silurian(?) rocks_________ . _ 10 Devonian and Devonian(?) rocks--___________-___-______________ 10 J Retreat Group and Gambier Bay Formation___-____-_._ __ 10 ^ Hood Bay Formation..... ............'............ 13 Permian rocks..___-----------------------------------------_-- 14 4 Cannery Formation...__________ _________________________ 14 Pybus Dolomite____---_-_-_-_---_---_---_--__ __________ 16 '>* Undifferentiated Permian and Triassic rocks._____________________ 17 Triassic rocks.__-______________---_---_-_-_---_-----_-________
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Region Meeting On-Time Public Comment Index
    ALASKA BOARD OF GAME Southeast Region Meeting , AK | January 11–15, 2019 Petersburg On-Time Public Comment Index Abbott, Jake ............................................................................................................................ PC001 Alaska Professional Hunters Association ................................................................................ PC002 Alaska Trappers Association ................................................................................................... PC003 Armstrong, Robert ................................................................................................................. PC004 Baker, Bruce ............................................................................................................................ PC005 Bakker, Jos .............................................................................................................................. PC006 Baluss, Gwen ........................................................................................................................... PC007 Behnke, Steve ......................................................................................................................... PC008 Belisle, Darren ........................................................................................................................ PC009 Bell, Mike ................................................................................................................................ PC010 Bennett, Joel ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treadwell Mine Historic Site and Trail Plan
    TREADWELL MINE HISTORIC SITE AND TRAIL PLAN DOUGLAS, ALASKA Alaska State Library-Historical Collections, P140-249 Prepared by Deborah Mattson, BLA Student Intern, Corvus Design n.com esig -d us rv o .c w w w Corvus Design TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS This work has been done by Deborah Mattson, a landscape architecture intern The Treadwell Historic Preservation and Restoration Society has taken good with Corvus Design, in an effort to assist the Treadwell Historic Preservation care of the site in conjunction with the City and Borough of Juneau based on and Restoration Society (THP&RS). It is based partly on Margaret Tharp's 2007 a 2009 agreement. In 2007, Margaret Tharp developed a master plan as a ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Master Plan and Wayne Jensen's Treadwell Mining Complex Historic Resources Master's thesis project, including both Savikko Park and the Treadwell Mining VICINITY MAP Survey, as well as additional information provided by the Treadwell Historic Complex. Margaret's master plan was adopted by the CBJ in June 2008 to Preservation and Restoration Society. The research and design work was inform upcoming site improvement decisions. Much of her work focused on PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS financed by Corvus Design as a pro bono community contribution. Savikko Park/Sandy Beach rather than the Treadwell Mining Complex, however, Thank you to all contributions, assistance, and feedback from Chris Mertl and there is some overlap and conceptual design suggestions for the complex. The 1— INTRODUCTION Linda Pringle of Corvus Design, and Wayne Jensen, Paulette Simpson, and other master plan provides important analysis and memorialization of the miners and members of (THP&RS).
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Patterns of Juneau Alaska and Their Relationship to Aircraft Hazards
    4.2 WEATHER PATTERNS OF JUNEAU ALASKA AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO AIRCRAFT HAZARDS Stephen A. Cohn*1, Jamie T. Braid1, Carl F. Dierking2, Marcia K. Politovich1, and Charles G. Wade1 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 2 National Weather Service, Juneau Forecast Office, Juneau, Alaska 1. INTRODUCTION Gulf of Alaska to the west, and when it comes over the Taku glacier to the northeast. On both Juneau is located on the coast of Southeast sides of the Channel the terrain rises steeply. Alaska. On its landward side, the Coast On the NE side there are several ridges and mountain range influences weather with nearby peaks separated by creek drainages. These peaks rising steeply from sea level to over 1 km. drainages are important in the case of Taku and On the Gulf of Alaska side are the islands of the gap flows. Valleys on this NE side are Alexander Archipelago. Local weather is associated (from N to S) with Lemon Creek, strongly influenced by flows from both sides – Salmon Creek, Gold Creek, and Sheep Creek. moist maritime air masses of strong low The up-valley ends of the Lemon and Salmon pressure systems from the Gulf of Alaska, and Creek valleys are more enclosed than Gold cold, dry continental air masses from interior Creek and Sheep Creek, so gap flows are less Canada (Colman, 1986). The synoptic patterns common. The Gold Creek valley includes and mesoscale systems interact with local downtown Juneau. To the northeast of these terrain to generate strong and complex local valleys and ridges are the Juneau ice fields and flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Indian Association, 2017
    Douglas Indian Association Anax Yaa Andagan Ye ̴̴ Sayeik Where the Sun Rays Touch First ̴̴ Spirit Helper Chief Anatlaháash of the T'aaku Tribe DOUGLAS INDIAN ASSOCIATION Federally recognized Tribe since 1934 The A`akw Kwáan & T`aaku Kwáan Tribal History 811 West 12th Street Juneau, Alaska 99801-1529 Phone: (907) 364-2916 Fax: (907) 364-2917 Background Douglas Indian Association (DIA), is the historical federally recognized Tribe of the Juneau, Douglas and Auke Bay region. While DIA also has members with other Alaska Native and American Indian lineage, it is primarily comprised of direct descendants of the Tribe’s original Base Roll membership originating from the T'aaḵu Kwáan and A'akw Kwáan clans which inhabited Anax YaatAndagan Yé (Douglas) and Dzantik'i Héeni (Juneau) since time immemorial. Some of the clans of DIA’s tribal territory are the Yanyeidí, Tsaateeneidí, Gaanaxádí, Ishkahittáan (T’aaku Kwáan), and L'eeneidí, Wooshkeetaan, L’uknax.adí (A’aakw Kwáan). DIA became a federally recognized tribe in 1934. Through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971, the State of Alaska conveyed lands to Native corporations formed under ANCSA, but no lands were conveyed to the Tribe(s). DIA’s traditional and historical territory encompasses the City and Borough of Juneau, as well as some areas to the east and north on Admiralty Island and the Chilkat Peninsula, to the south including Endicott Arm, and to the east into Canada in the areas of the Taku River and Atlin, B.C. Tribal History Tlingit people and their clans were well established and thriving in Southeast Alaska when European explorers made their first advances into the area in the 1700’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastineau Channel Formation, a Composite Glaciomarine Deposit Near Juneau, Alaska
    Gastineau Channel Formation, a Composite Glaciomarine Deposit Near Juneau, Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1394-C I <fcs.-*-*P J^ Gastineau Channel Formation, a Composite Glaciomarine Deposit Near Juneau, Alaska By ROBERT D. MILLER CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1394-C A description of the depositional environment and lithology of diamictons of late Pleistocene and early Holocene age* UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600290 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 35 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-0243P CONTENTS Page Abstract __ _ . Cl Introduction . 1 Definition _______. 2 Typical exposures __. 3 Fossils ____ _ . 9 Environment _____. 11 Age 13 Depositional history 15 References cited -_ 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map showing the known distribution of the Gastineau Channel Formation ____________________________ C8 2. Diagrammatic sketches showing interpretations of the manner of glaciomarine deposition and accumulation of related deposits during the three depositional facies of the Gastineau Channel Formation ____ __ ___ ____ 18 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Typical exposures of Gastineau Channel Formation and re­ sults of laboratory tests of selected samples ______ ___ C4 2. Fossils collected from selected outcrops of the three facies of the Gastineau Channel Formation, Juneau area, Alaska _________..______________________ 10 3. Foraminifera collected from outcrops in the Juneau area, Alaska, and assigned to facies of the Gastineau Channel Formation ______..__________________ 12 ill CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GASTINEAU CHANNEL FORMATION, A COMPOSITE GLACIOMARINE DEPOSIT NEAR JUNEAU, ALASKA By ROBERT D.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration,Enhancement,And Mitigation Opportunities Within
    RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN JUNEAU WATERSHEDS VOL. I LITERATURE REVIEW JUNEAU WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP Our mission is to Organization Name: Juneau Watershed Partnership promote watershed Contact: Amy Sumner, Project Coordinator integrity in the City Mailing Address: PO Box 35132 and Borough of Juneau, AK 99803-5132 Juneau through Email: [email protected] education, research and communication while encouraging sustainable use and development. This report is funded with qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior GRANT # 10 – CIAP – 030 CFDA 15.688 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Methods ................................................................................................................................... 9 Watersheds Outside The USAB ................................................................................................................... 13 Watersheds within the USAB ...................................................................................................................... 22 Mendenhall River ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]