Scientific Collaboration on the Internet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scientific Collaboration on the Internet SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION ON THE INTERNET > > ZY^iZYWn<VgnB#Dahdc!6ccO^bbZgbVc!VcYCVi]Vc7dh [dgZldgYWnL^aa^Vb6#Lja[ Scientific Collaboration on the Internet Acting with Technology Bonnie Nardi, Victor Kaptelinin, and Kirsten Foot, editors Tracing Genres through Organizations: A Sociocultural Approach to Information Design, Clay Spinuzzi, 2003 Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems, Geri Gay and Helene Hembrooke, 2004 The Semiotic Engineering of Human Computer Interaction, Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, 2004 Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge, Gerry Stahl, 2006 Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design, Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A. Nardi, 2006 Web Campaigning, Kirsten A. Foot and Steven M. Schneider, 2006 Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, and Nathan Bos, editors, 2008 Scientific Collaboration on the Internet edited by Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, and Nathan Bos The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about special quantity discounts, please e-mail [email protected] This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed on recycled paper and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scientific collaboration on the Internet / edited by Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, and Nathan Bos ; foreword by William A. Wulf. p. cm. — (Acting with technology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-15120-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Science—Computer network resources. 2. Internet. I. Olson, Gary M. II. Zimmerman, Ann, 1962– III. Bos, Nathan. Q182.7.S36 2008 507.2—dc22 2008007300 10987654321 Contents Foreword by William A. Wulf ix Preface xi Introduction 1 Gary M. Olson, Nathan Bos, and Ann Zimmerman I The Contemporary Collaboratory Vision 13 1 E-Science, Cyberinfrastructure, and Scholarly Communication 15 Tony Hey and Anne Trefethen 2 Cyberscience: The Age of Digitized Collaboration? 33 Michael Nentwich II Perspectives on Distributed, Collaborative Science 51 3 From Shared Databases to Communities of Practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories 53 Nathan Bos, Ann Zimmerman, Judith S. Olson, Jude Yew, Jason Yerkie, Erik Dahl, Daniel Cooney, and Gary M. Olson 4 A Theory of Remote Scientific Collaboration 73 Judith S. Olson, Erik C. Hofer, Nathan Bos, Ann Zimmerman, Gary M. Olson, Daniel Cooney, and Ixchel Faniel 5 Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries 99 Jonathon N. Cummings and Sara Kiesler vi Contents III Physical Sciences 119 6 A National User Facility That Fits on Your Desk: The Evolution of Collaboratories at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 121 James D. Myers 7 The National Virtual Observatory 135 Mark S. Ackerman, Erik C. Hofer, and Robert J. Hanisch 8 High-Energy Physics: The Large Hadron Collider Collaborations 143 Erik C. Hofer, Shawn McKee, Jeremy P. Birnholtz, and Paul Avery 9 The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory and the Space Physics and Aeronomy Research Collaboratory 153 Gary M. Olson, Timothy L. Killeen, and Thomas A. Finholt 10 Evaluation of a Scientific Collaboratory System: Investigating Utility before Deployment 171 Diane H. Sonnenwald, Mary C. Whitton, and Kelly L. Maglaughlin IV Biological and Health Sciences 195 11 The National Institute of General Medical Sciences Glue Grant Program 197 Michael E. Rogers and James Onken 12 The Biomedical Informatics Research Network 221 Judith S. Olson, Mark Ellisman, Mark James, Jeffrey S. Grethe, and Mary Puetz 13 Three Distributed Biomedical Research Centers 233 Stephanie D. Teasley, Titus Schleyer, Libby Hemphill, and Eric Cook 14 Motivation to Contribute to Collaboratories: A Public Goods Approach 251 Nathan Bos V Earth and Environmental Sciences 275 15 Ecology Transformed: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the Changing Patterns of Ecological Research 277 Edward J. Hackett, John N. Parker, David Conz, Diana Rhoten, and Andrew Parker 16 The Evolution of Collaboration in Ecology: Lessons from the U.S. Long-Term Ecological Research Program 297 William K. Michener and Robert B. Waide Contents vii 17 Organizing for Multidisciplinary Collaboration: The Case of the Geosciences Network 311 David Ribes and Geoffrey C. Bowker 18 NEESgrid: Lessons Learned for Future Cyberinfrastructure Development 331 B. F. Spencer Jr., Randal Butler, Kathleen Ricker, Doru Marcusiu, Thomas A. Finholt, Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, and Jeremy P. Birnholtz VI The Developing World 349 19 International AIDS Research Collaboratories: The HIV Pathogenesis Program 351 Matthew Bietz, Marsha Naidoo, and Gary M. Olson 20 How Collaboratories Affect Scientists from Developing Countries 365 Airong Luo and Judith S. Olson Conclusion Final Thoughts: Is There a Science of Collaboratories? 377 Nathan Bos, Gary M. Olson, and Ann Zimmerman Contributors 395 Index 399 Foreword In 1988, I was offered the extraordinary opportunity to serve as an assistant director of the National Science Foundation (NSF), and be in charge of the Directorate of Com- puter and Information Science and Engineering (CISE). At the time, CISE was responsi- ble for funding computer science and engineering research, but it also ran the National Supercomputer Centers and NSFnet.1 Several months elapsed between the time when I was offered the job and when I was able to actually assume it—months that afforded me the chance to think about what I should try to accomplish in the two years I expected to hold the job. It was then that the notion of leveraging the entire scientific enterprise with networking came to me. The idea was that we could both expand and improve research in all fields by provid- ing remote access to colleagues, instrumentation, data, and computation. In 1989, Josh Lederberg, Nobelist and president of Rockefeller University, hosted a small workshop where we both tested and fleshed out the initial idea, and then wrote the report that was the guiding road map for subsequent work. The word collaboratory (an amalgam of collaboration and laboratory) was invented later, and not by me, but the concept it describes has changed remarkably little from the initial one of 1988–1999. I was com- pletely naive, however, about how hard achieving the vision would be—as is shown by the successes and difficulties documented in the present volume. In addition to the specifics of the various collaboratories depicted here, I am in- trigued by the final chapter’s question: Is there a ‘‘science of collaboratories’’? Perhaps there is a reason why it has been hard to consistently achieve the original simple vision, and perhaps understanding that reason can be discovered using the scientific method. I hope so. I have a deep conviction that the goal of that vision is worthy of pursuit! My thanks to the authors and editors of this volume for succinctly capturing the state of the art and science of collaboratories, and especially for doing so in an honest and balanced way. William A. Wulf Professor, University of Virginia President emeritus, National Academy of Engineering x Foreword Note 1. NSFnet was the expansion of the old ARPAnet and the immediate predecessor of the current Internet. It was only accessible by researchers and not the general public. Preface As described in the introduction, the work included in this volume was in one way or another associated with the Science of Collaboratories (SOC) project headquartered at the University of Michigan’s School of Information. We review some of the history of this project in the introduction. But here we’d like to give credit to a number of people who played important roles in the project. A key organizing activity of this project was a series of workshops held during the study. To plan these workshops and the early directions of the project, we convened a group of expert advisers that included Jim Myers, Jim Herbsleb, Diane Sonnenwald, Mark Ellisman, and Nestor Zaluzec. This group met in February 2001 at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport with Gary Olson, Tom Finholt, Joseph Hardin, and Ann Verhey-Henke from the University of Michigan. At this O’Hare meeting, a series of workshops were planned to help define the focus of the project and engage a broader audience in its activities. Over the next couple of years five workshops were held. The first two, held in summer 2001, focused on the so- cial and technical underpinnings of collaboratories, respectively. Two subsequent workshops, held in 2002 and 2003, presented preliminary analyses and case studies, which represented early versions of much of the Michigan-based material in this vol- ume. Another workshop, held at the NSF in November 2002, took a broad look at knowledge environments for science and engineering. In June 2005, many of the authors of material in this book gathered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, to present preliminary versions of their chapters. The give-and-take at this meeting generated a lot of cross-fertilization, which is hopefully reflected in the vol- ume. We are grateful to all the contributing authors for their participation and pa- tience throughout every aspect of this volume’s preparation. Many of the principals in the SOC project
Recommended publications
  • Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use Timothy K
    University of Cincinnati College of Law University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications Faculty Articles and Other Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2006 Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use Timothy K. Armstrong University of Cincinnati College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Intellectual Property Commons Recommended Citation Armstrong, Timothy K., "Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use" (2006). Faculty Articles and Other Publications. Paper 146. http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs/146 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles and Other Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Harvard Journal ofLaw & Technology Volume 20, Number 1 Fall 2006 DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT AND THE PROCESS OF FAIR USE Timothy K. Armstrong* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: LEGAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROTECTIONS FOR FAIR USE OF COPYRIGHTED WORKS ........................................ 50 II. COPYRIGHT LAW AND/OR DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT .......... 56 A. Traditional Copyright: The Normative Baseline ........................ 56 B. Contemporary Copyright: DRM as a "Speedbump" to Slow Mass Infringement ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Enterprise Collaboration
    Enabling enterprise collaboration Summer Hugo Sarrrazin Copyright © McKinsey & Company 2013 Kara Sprague Michael Huskins 2 Enabling enterprise collaboration The success of large organizations often depends on the ability of its employees to work collaboratively across time and distance. Greater collaboration increases productivity, enhances innovation, and reduces time-to-market. There are numerous IT tools that enable collaboration within the enterprise. These tools often overlap in functionality, have different standards, create security concerns, or put additional burdens on a company’s IT organization and infrastructure. Consequently, in many companies, IT infrastructure executives are working through how best to select, deploy, and support the right set of collaboration tools. Although the lines are not clearly drawn, collaboration tools broadly fall into one of several categories: Communication: Tools that enable synchronous and asynchronous communication, including videoconferencing, instant messaging, white-boarding tools, and e-mail. Team collaboration: Tools that help teams organize their work and work product, including file sharing, project planning/management, group calendaring, and event scheduling. Writing/editing: Tools that help teams work together on documents and/or publish documents, including wikis and online document processing tools (e.g., GoogleDocs). Engaging/networking: Sites and tools that enable social media, networking and blogging. We recently convened several Silicon Valley IT executives at the Chief Infrastructure Technology Executive Roundtable (CITER) to discuss how best to derive value from collaboration and collaboration tools. This overview synthesizes the findings from our discussions with the CITER members. 1. The benefits of collaboration tools are there, but it is often difficult to measure these benefits and calculate return on investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz
    Report to the President MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz Review Panel Harold Abelson Peter A. Diamond Andrew Grosso Douglas W. Pfeiffer (support) July 26, 2013 © Copyright 2013, Massachusetts Institute of Technology This worK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. PRESIDENT REIF’S CHARGE TO HAL ABELSON | iii L. Rafael Reif, President 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 3-208 Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 U.S.A. Phone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
    [Show full text]
  • RSC Policy Brief: Three Myths About Copyright Law and Where to Start to Fix It
    RSC Policy Brief: Three Myths about Copyright Law and Where to Start to Fix it: November 16, 2012 RSC Staff Contact: Derek S. Khanna, [email protected], (202) 226-0718 This paper will analyze current US Copyright Law by examining three myths on copyright law and possible reforms to copyright law that will lead to more economic development for the private sector and to a copyright law that is more firmly based upon constitutional principles. 1. The purpose of copyright is to compensate the creator of the content: It’s a common misperception that the Constitution enables our current legal regime of copyright protection – in fact, it does not. The Constitution’s clause on Copyright and patents states: “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;” (Article I, Section 8, Clause 8) Thus, according to the Constitution, the overriding purpose of the copyright system is to “promote the progress of science and useful arts.” In today’s terminology we may say that the purpose is to lead to maximum productivity and innovation. This is a major distinction, because most legislative discussions on this topic, particularly during the extension of the copyright term, are not premised upon what is in the public good or what will promote the most productivity and innovation, but rather what the content creators “deserve” or are “entitled to” by virtue of their creation. This lexicon is appropriate in the realm of taxation and sometimes in the realm of trade protection, but it is inappropriate in the realm of patents and copyrights.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Commons Niki
    Creative Commons Creative Commons History Lawrence Lessig Hal Abelson Copyright Copyleft How to get a license The 4 Elements of a CC License Freedom of Information Brands/Companies That Have Used CC Criticism of Creative Commons Creative Commons History: Creative Commons was founded in 2011 as “a nonprofit organization” (page 1) which aimed to “promote an expansion of copyright law to allow greater access, use, and repurposing of creative works.” (page 1) In 2005, the organisation expanded their licensing to include scientific works which they called Science Commons[1] (page 1). Creative Commons was originally focused on U.S copyright, but since then has “expanded its licenses to be compatible with copyright laws in more than 50 countries.” (page 1) What they offer are “licenses that can be applied by copyright owners to their work to allow or prohibit certain uses.” (page 1) Dowling, John D.H. “Creative Commons.” Encyclopaedia of Social Movement Media(2011): 1-3. SAGE Knowledge, 01 Dec. 2010. Web. Lawrence Lessig Creative Commons has three original founders, one being “Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford intellectual property scholar”[1], who is also the “founder of its Centre for Internet and Society” [2]. His motivations behind creating and chairing Creative Commons is based around his belief that “recent developments in intellectual property law are moving us as a society away from freedom (especially the freedom to spread ideas that our new technologies can allow) toward greater control.” [1] Furthermore, he champions the belief that creators should assert their right not only to protect their works, but allowed them to be shared with less restrictions[1].
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Research Through Improved Online Collaboration Software
    51-OVP-A154 Promoting Research through Improved Online Collaboration Software An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Science Sponsoring Agency: International Financial Laboratory, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Submitted to: On-Site Liaison: Alexander Didenko, Dean of “International Economic Relations” faculty at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Project Advisor: Oleg Pavlov, WPI Professor Project Co-advisor: Creighton Peet, WPI Professor Submitted by: Elijah Gonzalez Qiaoyu Liao Nicholas Wong Date: 15 October 2015 This report represents the work of three WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. i Abstract The purpose of this project was to create an online platform to facilitate and promote research collaboration among faculty and students at the Financial University in Moscow. We gathered data on this problem through holding interviews and focus groups. Using this data we decided which online research collaboration tool would work best for the university, and we developed a prototype SharePoint website that delivers the features we determined to be most essential for successful online research collaboration. ii Acknowledgements Our team would like to express our appreciation to the following individuals for their contribution to the success of this project. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation: Professor Alexander Didenko, Dean of “International Economics Relation” of Financial University and Project Liaison Inna Lukashenko, Head of International Financial Laboratory of Financial University Vladimir I.
    [Show full text]
  • "Collaboration" in the National Security Arena
    TOPICAL STRATEGIC MULTI-LAYER ASSESSMENT (SMA) MULTI-AGENCY/MULTI-DISCIPLINARY WHITE PAPERS IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER-TERRORISM AND COUNTER-WMD Collaboration in the National Security Arena: Myths and Reality - What Science and Experience Can Contribute to its Success June 2009 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated. Editorial Board: Jennifer O’Connor (DHS), Chair Elisa Jayne Bienenstock (NSI), Robert O. Briggs (UNO), Carl "Pappy" Dodd (STRATCOM/GISC), Carl Hunt, (DTI), Kathleen Kiernan (RRTO), Joan McIntyre (ODNI), Randy Pherson (Pherson), Tom Rieger (Gallup) Contributing Authors: Sarah Miller Beebe (Pherson), Keith Bergeron (USAFA), Elisa Jayne Bienenstock (NSI), Deborah Boehm-Davis (GMU), Robert O. Briggs (UNO), Chris Bronk (Rice), Kerry Buckley (MITRE), Joseph Carls (ret), Nancy Chesser (DTI), Lee Cronk (Rutgers), Bert Davis (ERDC), M. Jude Egan (LSU), Justin Franks (ODNI), Nahum Gershon (MITRE), Tamra Hall (MITRE), Col Craig Harm (NASIC), Richards Heuer, Jr. (Consultant), LTC Brad Hilton (US Army), Carl Hunt (DTI), Kathleen Kiernan (RRTO), Larry Kuznar (NSI), John M. Linebarger (Sandia), Joseph Lyons (AFRL/RHXS), Jean MacMillan (Aptima), Joan McIntyre (ODNI), Brian Meadows (SPAWAR), Victoria Moreno-Jackson, (Nat'l Assoc for Community Mediation), Gale Muller (Gallup), S. K. Numrich (IDA), Jennifer O’Connor (DHS), Douglas Palmer (ODNI), Stacy Lovell Pfautz (NSI), Randy Pherson (Pherson), Terry Pierce (DHS & USAFA),
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Business Collaboration with Social Networking
    Chapter 1 Connecting Business Collaboration with Social Networking In This Chapter ▶ Understanding what social collaboration means ▶ Moving beyond the “Facebook inside your company” slogan ▶ Accessing new resources in social collaboration systems ▶ Competing and coexisting with e-mail ▶ Finding practical applications for social collaboration e often talk about having a social life, separate from our work Wlives, recognizing that mingling the two can be hazardous. Social Collaboration For Dummies isn’t a book about being social at work, in the sense of flirting or sharing jokes. By social collaboration, I mean recognizing that business is inherently social, even when social interaction is constrained within the bounds of professionalism. In this chapter, I help you understand what social collaboration is (and what it isn’t), outline some of the benefits of implementing a social collaboration system in your business, and suggest some ways that you can help colleagues shift fromCOPYRIGHTED e-mail to social collaboration tools MATERIAL (and know when to use one over the other). I also give you some real-world examples of how social collabora- tion can help employees solve specific problems and complete tasks more efficiently. 005_9781118658543-ch01.indd5_9781118658543-ch01.indd 7 99/25/13/25/13 111:401:40 AAMM 8 Part I: Getting Started with Social Collaboration Defining Social Collaboration Social collaboration comprises social networking and social media for the purpose of getting work done in an enterprise setting. The collaboration part is just as important as the social part. In this context, collaboration is about getting work done with teams of people, working together toward a common goal — which is essential to any business.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
    Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software June 2013 INDUSTRY REPORT INSIDE THIS ISSUE Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software 1. Introduction INTRODUCTION 2. Market Trends This report focuses on technologies for collaboration and socialization within the enterprise. A number of forces are currently playing out in the enterprise IT 3. Competitive Landscape environment that are creating an inflection in the adoption and deployment of social and collaboration technologies. This significant uptrend has provided strong 4. M&A Activity growth for the sector and is driving a substantial amount of M&A and investment activity. This report includes a review of the recent M&A and private investing 5. Private Financings activities in enterprise social and collaboration software, particularly within the areas of group collaboration & workspaces, private social platforms, project and 6. Valution Trends social task management, event scheduling, web collaboration, white boarding & diagramming, and other related technologies. We have also profiled about 50 emerging private players in these subcategories to provide an overview of the 7. Emerging Private Companies breadth and diversity of the players targeting this sector. OVERVIEW Socialization and collaboration technologies are currently reshaping the established enterprise collaboration market as well as creating whole new categories of offerings, especially around private social platforms. In addition, many other enterprise applications such as CRM and unified communications are heavily transformed through the incorporation of new technologies including group messaging & activity feeds, document collaboration, and analytics. Much of this change is being driven by the consumerization of IT and the incorporation of social technologies. As businesses look to leverage the benefits of improved “connecting” and “network building” that employees have experienced with Facebook and other social solutions, a convergence is occurring between the enterprise social software and collaboration markets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Collaboration Software – a Qualitative Study
    THE FUTURE OF COLLABORATION SOFTWARE – A QUALITATIVE STUDY 15 Thought Leaders Share their Predictions for Future Trends & Challenges The Future of Collaboration Software – A Qualitative Study - Introduction 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 WRIKE.………………………ANDREW FILEV, FOUNDER & CEO ............................................................. 3 SMARTSHEET…………….BRENT FREI, FOUNDER & CMO ................................................................. 5 TRELLO …………………….STELLA GARBER, VP OF MARKETING ......................................................... 7 QUIP ………………………..MOLLY GRAHAM, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER .......................................... 9 MIKOGO …………………..ERIK BOOS, CO-FOUNDER & DIRECTOR .................................................. 12 DOCUSIGN ……………….BRIANNA DINSMORE, SENIOR MANAGER DEMAND GENERATION ........ 14 MINDMEISTER ………….RAPHAELA BRANDNER, MARKETING MANAGER ..................................... 16 EXO PLATFORM ………..PATRICE LAMARQUE, CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER .................................... 18 SAMEPAGE ………………..SCOTT SCHREIMAN, CEO ........................................................................ 20 NETDOCUMENTS ……..MARRIOTT MURDOCK MBA, PMP®, MARKETING DIRECTOR.................. 22 HIGHQ ……………………..AJAY PATEL, CO-FOUNDER & CEO ........................................................... 25 TIME DOCTOR ………….LIAM MARTIN, CO-FOUNDER..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Free As in Freedom (2.0): Richard Stallman and the Free Software Revolution
    Free as in Freedom (2.0): Richard Stallman and the Free Software Revolution Sam Williams Second edition revisions by Richard M. Stallman i This is Free as in Freedom 2.0: Richard Stallman and the Free Soft- ware Revolution, a revision of Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software. Copyright c 2002, 2010 Sam Williams Copyright c 2010 Richard M. Stallman Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled \GNU Free Documentation License." Published by the Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St., Fifth Floor Boston, MA 02110-1335 USA ISBN: 9780983159216 The cover photograph of Richard Stallman is by Peter Hinely. The PDP-10 photograph in Chapter 7 is by Rodney Brooks. The photo- graph of St. IGNUcius in Chapter 8 is by Stian Eikeland. Contents Foreword by Richard M. Stallmanv Preface by Sam Williams vii 1 For Want of a Printer1 2 2001: A Hacker's Odyssey 13 3 A Portrait of the Hacker as a Young Man 25 4 Impeach God 37 5 Puddle of Freedom 59 6 The Emacs Commune 77 7 A Stark Moral Choice 89 8 St. Ignucius 109 9 The GNU General Public License 123 10 GNU/Linux 145 iii iv CONTENTS 11 Open Source 159 12 A Brief Journey through Hacker Hell 175 13 Continuing the Fight 181 Epilogue from Sam Williams: Crushing Loneliness 193 Appendix A { Hack, Hackers, and Hacking 209 Appendix B { GNU Free Documentation License 217 Foreword by Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • December 18, 2015 Sharon Leu U.S. Department of Education 400
    December 18, 2015 Sharon Leu U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Rm 6W252 Washington, D.C. 20202 Re: Open Licensing Requirement for Direct Grant Programs (ED-2015-OS-0105) Dear Ms. Leu: Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments to the Department of Education’s (Department) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the Open Licensing Requirement for Direct Grant Programs. Creative Commons is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation dedicated to making it easy for people to share and build upon the work of others, consistent with the rules of copyright. CC provides standard, free, open licenses and other legal tools to mark creative work with the freedoms the creator wants it to carry. Creative Commons licenses—and policies requiring CC licensing—are in play around the world. Governments require CC licensing, such as the Department of Labor Trade ​ Adjustment Community College and Career Training (TAACCCT) grant program, the ​ Australian Governments Open Access and Licensing Framework, and the Polish ​ ​ Ministry of Infrastructure and Development. Intergovernmental organizations such as ​ the World Bank and World Health Organization have adopted Creative Commons ​ ​ ​ ​ licensing for some of their publications and datasets. Major scientific and scholarly research funders require Creative Commons licensing for articles resulting from their funding, including the Research Councils UK and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. ​ ​ ​ ​ Millions of websites use CC licensing, including Wikipedia, Europeana, and the Public Library of Science. There are over 1 billion CC licensed works available on the web. ​ ​ ​ Published in 2013, the Creative Commons 4.0 licenses are the worldwide standard for sharing copyrighted resources under open terms that are understood and accepted globally.
    [Show full text]