DOCSLIB.ORG

The Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia THE APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR COUNSEL IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA THE LAW SOCIETY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Final Paper Prepared by the Executive of the Law Society of Western Australia for consideration by the Council of the Law Society of Western Australia 21 November 2012 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 Background .............................................................................................................. 5 2011 Ad Hoc Committee on the Appointment of Senior Counsel and Further Call for Submissions ................................................................................................................... 5 Council Seeks Consultation after Receipt of the Ad Hoc Committee’s Discussion Paper ............................................................................................................................... 7 List of Submissions Received ....................................................................................... 8 Structure of this Final Report ........................................................................................ 9 Current Process and Criteria for Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia .................................................................................................................. 10 Historical Overview ................................................................................................ 14 The 1980 Clarkson Committee Report ........................................................................ 15 The Criterion of Eminence ........................................................................................... 24 The Criterion of Availability ......................................................................................... 25 The Criterion of Freedom in Mode of Practice ........................................................... 26 Applying the Criteria to the Style of Practice ............................................................. 27 Clarkson Committee's Recommendations Concerning Criteria ............................... 29 1996 Law Society Review ............................................................................................. 30 1999 Proposed Amendments by Attorney General Peter Foss ................................. 32 2001 Labor Government Amendments ....................................................................... 32 Process for Appointment of Senior Counsel in Other Australian States and Territories ............................................................................................................... 34 The Australian Capital Territory .................................................................................. 34 New South Wales.......................................................................................................... 37 The Northern Territory ................................................................................................. 45 Tasmania ....................................................................................................................... 47 South Australia ............................................................................................................. 50 Victoria .......................................................................................................................... 55 Queensland ................................................................................................................... 64 Overseas Jurisdictions .......................................................................................... 69 New Zealand ................................................................................................................. 69 England and Wales ....................................................................................................... 74 Discussion: Submissions Received by the Society in Relation to the 2011 Ad Hoc Committee Discussion Paper ........................................................................ 81 Support for Continued Law Society Participation ...................................................... 81 Criteria for Appointment .............................................................................................. 81 The “Practice Discrimination” Argument ................................................................... 83 Improvement of the Process ....................................................................................... 84 Recommendations to Council ............................................................................... 86 Why these recommendations? ............................................................................ 87 The Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia Recommendations of the Law Society of Western Australia Page 2 Introduction 1. In May 2012, the Council of the Law Society of Western Australia (Council) held a Special Council Meeting to consider the position of the Law Society on the appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia. 2. This meeting arose after a lengthy period of consultation with Society members and relevant stakeholders (discussed in detail below). Its purpose was to consider a Draft Policy Paper prepared by the Executive of the Law Society of Western Australia that outlined the history of the appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia, as well as the current process for appointment of Senior Counsel throughout Australia and internationally. 3. Whilst no final decisions were made or recommendations passed at the May 2012 Special Council Meeting, the Council requested that the Executive re-draft the Draft Policy Paper prepared for the Special Council Meeting and prepare a Final Paper to enable that Paper to serve as explanation of the Council’s position to third parties and to take into consideration the many issues discussed at the May 2012 Special Council Meeting. 4. In summary, the conclusions articulated at the May 2012 Special Council Meeting as important and arising from a process of consideration, consultation and debate in relation to the appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia were as follows: 1. The Society continue to support the retention of Senior Counsel in Western Australia. 2. The Society continue to support the criteria for appointment listed in paragraph 4 of Practice Direction 10.3. However, the Society recommend that the Chief Justice of Western Australia add a further element of “leadership in the practice and ethics of law” to the list of criteria in the Practice Direction. 3. The Society recommend to the Chief Justice of Western Australia that appointment of Senior Counsel continue to be open to solicitors and barristers and that the criteria for appointment be modified to ensure non-discrimination on the basis of mode of practice. The Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia Recommendations of the Law Society of Western Australia Page 3 4. The Society continue to support the current appointment process and recommend to the Chief Justice of Western Australia that the Presidents (or their nominee) of the Law Society of Western Australia, the Western Australian Bar Association and Women Lawyers WA be added to the Chief Justice’s Consultation Committee. 5. The Society recommend to the Chief Justice of Western Australia that paragraph 13 of Consolidated Practice Direction 10.3 be amended to require all applicants to address the criteria in paragraph 4 and to provide at least three referees in their application. 6. The Society amend its Protocol for the Appointment of Senior Counsel to include a member of the Young Lawyers Committee who is also a member of the Law Society Council. 7. The Society recommend to the Chief Justice of Western Australia that unsuccessful applicants be advised by the Chief Justice in writing of the reasons why they were unsuccessful. 5. In substance, all of these points reflect the Council’s objective that the Law Society should be a leader in ensuring that the processes for appointment remain relevant and consultative. 6. This Final Paper has been prepared by the Executive of the Law Society of Western Australia for the consideration of the Council at its November 2012 Council meeting. It provides an overview of the historical and current criteria and appointment processes for Senior Counsel in Western Australia and compares these to the processes currently used in all other Australian and some overseas jurisdictions. Finally, it summarises submissions received by the Council and outlines in detail seven recommendations based on these submissions and discussions with relevant stakeholders throughout 2011 and 2012. Council will be asked to approve or reject these seven recommendations at its November 2012 Council meeting. The Appointment of Senior Counsel in Western Australia Recommendations of the Law Society of Western Australia Page 4 Background The 2011 Ad Hoc Committee on the Appointment of Senior Counsel 7. At a meeting of the Council of the Law Society of Western Australia held on 9 August 2010 the Law Society adopted, on an interim basis, a Protocol to assist the President (or his/her nominee) to meaningfully participate in the consultation process as required by paragraph 10.3 (18)(d) of the Consolidated Practice Directions. 8. The Society’s Protocol was introduced shortly after the WA Bar Association released its own protocol. 9. At the 9 August 2010 meeting, questions were asked
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORIGINS of the WA BAR the Independent Bar in Western Australia Origins and Functions of the Western Australian Bar Association from an Article Written in 1996
    ORIGINS OF THE WA BAR The Independent Bar in Western Australia Origins and Functions of the Western Australian Bar Association From an article written in 1996 by the Hon Mr Justice David Malcolm AC QC, former Chief Justice of Western Australia Since the formal establishment of the WABA, the Association has provided the corporate structure which represents the interests of those who have elected to practise solely as barristers. As at 1 September 1995 there were 114 members who were practising barristers resident in Western Australia, and 56 interstate members. The resident members included 22 Queen's Counsel and of the interstate members 30 were Queen's Counsel from other States who had taken silk in Western Australia. The WABA also has honorary and judicial members. The WABA was not formed for the purpose of dividing the profession into barristers and solicitors as is the case in some jurisdictions where the profession is 'divided'. The formation of the Independent Bar was a professional response to a perceived professional need. The continued growth of the Bar has provided concrete evidence of the continuation of that need. The formation of the Independent Bar was facilitated by the flexibility built into the Legal Practitioners Act 1893. The Act then provided for persons to be admitted as 'practitioners'. A practitioner was defined as 'a person admitted and entitled to practise as a barrister, solicitor, attorney and proctor of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, or in any one or more of these capacities.' No person had in fact been admitted to practise as a solicitor alone or a barrister alone, and no specific provision existed for separate qualifications for any such admission.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation and Development of the the Ability of the Bar and Judiciary to Uphold the Rights of Both the Citizen and the State
    Organisation and Development of the Legal Profession in Africa, in particular the ability of the Bar and judiciary to uphold the rights of both the citizen and the state His Hon.Judge T O. Elias'*' By way of a Preface to the present study on the legal profession in Commonwealth Africa, I a brief reference should be made to some of the less well-known contributions made by Lord Denning to the expansion of the frontiers of English law in this field. I wish to recall that I first sat under the Chairmanship of Lord Denning in the Committee on Legal Development in the Colonies, under the auspices of the House of Commons, in 1954; I was later honoured by an invitation of the Chief Justice of Trinidad and Tobago to give a Commonwealth Lecture series there in the footsteps of Lord Denning who had, a few years earlier, given a similar, but no doubt more authoritative, series oflectures on the Common Law in Trinidad and Tobago; and at the Commonwealth Magistrates Association Conference at Kuala Lumpur I was to have given one of the keynote addresses under Lord Denning's Chairmanship, but the second coup d'etat in Nigeria, in July 1975, prevented me from leaving Lagos to attend the Conference. I should also recall the two notable occasions when Lord Denning came to Nigeria: once to participate in the Constitution-making Conference on the eve of independence, and again, in 1974, when, accompanied by Lord Elwyn-Jones the then Lord Chancellor of Great Britain, Lord Denning sat with my colleagues and me, as Chief Justice, in the Supreme Court of Nigeria to hear an appeal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquor Commission of Western Australia 2013/14 Annual Report
    Liquor Commission of Western Australia 2013/14 Annual Report P a g e | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contacts .......................................................................................................................... 2 Statement of Compliance ................................................................................................ 3 Overview of Agency ........................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 4 Operational Structure ........................................................................................... 6 Administrative Structure ....................................................................................... 9 Significant Appeals Before the Commission .................................................................. 15 Significant Issues Impacting the Liquor Commission .................................................... 28 Trends or Special Problems That Have Emerged .............................................. 28 Forecasts of the Commission‟s Workload For 2014/15 ...................................... 28 Proposals For Improving the Operation of the Commission ............................... 28 Other Legal and Government Policy Requirements ........................................... 29 P a g e | 2 CONTACTS Office location: Level 1 87 Adelaide Terrace East Perth WA 6004 Postal address: PO Box 6119 East Perth WA 6892 Telephone: (08)
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Counsel Appointments 2020
    SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA David Malcolm Justice Centre 28 Barrack Street Perth WA 6000 __________________________________________________________________________ 25 November 2020 MEDIA STATEMENT – SENIOR COUNSEL APPOINTMENTS 2020 The Chief Justice of Western Australia, the Hon Justice Peter Quinlan, today announced the appointment of six Senior Counsel for 2020, after 25 applications were received. The appointments are Mr Graham Droppert, Ms Penelope Giles, Mr Alan Sefton, Mr Matthew Curwood, Ms Kim Lendich and Mr Lindsay Fox. Four of the appointees practise as barristers, with two counsel employed by the State Solicitor's Office and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions respectively. Appointment as Senior Counsel is based on eminence in the practice of law, especially in advocacy, unquestioned integrity, availability and independence. A Committee advises the Chief Justice on applications for appointment. The Committee, chaired by Chief Justice Quinlan, comprises the President of the Court of Appeal, the Senior Judge of the Supreme Court, the President of the State Administrative Tribunal, a Judge of the Federal Court resident in Perth, the Chief Judge of the Family Court and the Chief Judge of the District Court. Mr Graham Droppert Mr Droppert was admitted to practice in Western Australia in 1982. He has practised as an independent barrister since 1996, most recently from Albert Wolff Chambers. Prior to joining the Bar he practised, including as a partner, at private law firms in Western Australia. Mr Droppert practises in personal injuries litigation including medical negligence claims, with a particular focus on cases in which plaintiffs have suffered catastrophic injuries. He is the current National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance as well as having served as State President for the ALA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Challenge for the Western Australian Legal Profession: a Lack of Diversity at the WA Bar?
    A cultural challenge for the Western Australian legal profession: a lack of diversity at the WA Bar? JILL HOWIESON* AND TOMAS FITZGERALD* At the request of the Western Australian Bar Association, the authors undertook a study into issues of diversity at the Western Australian Bar. Members of the Association had noticed, but not speciically studied, various demographic imbalances in the Bar’s constitution. A review of the literature revealed that there was a paucity of statistical analysis of the makeup of Australian barrister associations generally, let alone into any speciic reasons as to how and why a demographic imbalance might exist. Recognising that a clearer picture of the breakdown of the demographics of the Western Australian legal profession and of the speciic cultures that might exist at the Bar was needed, the authors undertook a study that examined whether there was an existing legal monoculture at the Bar, and if so what some of the reasons for this might be. The authors conjectured that being ignorant as to how to become a barrister and having a sense of isolation from the legal profession generally, might be reasons for the cultural imbalance (if it indeed existed) and then set about to investigate this empirically. The results revealed that there might be hidden barriers that work to inhibit a broad range of legal professionals from progressing to the Bar. In particular, a knowledge of how to become a barrister, how legal professionals and students feel that they ‘it in’ to the local legal culture and the various myths that exist about life at the Bar might be inhibiting the progress of a diverse demographic of people from joining the Bar.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 5 Issue 3 Fall Fall 1983 A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J. Berger Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marilyn J. Berger, A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education, 5 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 540 (1983-1984) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Mariyn J Berger* I. INTRODUCTION The conduct of a trial in England is undeniably an impressive un- dertaking. Costume alone transports the viewer to Elizabethan time. Counsel and judges, bewigged and gowned,' appear in a cloistered, re- gal setting, strewn with leather-bound books. Brightly colored ribbons of red, green, yellow and white, rather than metal clips and staples fasten the legal papers.2 After comparison with the volatile atmosphere and often unruly conduct of a trial in a United States courtroom, it is natural to assume that the British model of courtroom advocacy pro- * B.S., 1965, Cornell University; J.D., University of California at Berkeley. Associate Profes- sor of Law, University of Puget Sound School of Law. This article is based on the author's obser- vations and interviews while a Visiting Professor of Law at the Polytechnic of the South Bank in London, 1981-82, and a scholar-in-residence at King's College, December-June, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • The Notary Public in Singapore (Steffanny Cristine)
    The Notary Public in Singapore (Steffanny Cristine) Volume 8 No. 1, March 2021 Nationally Accredited Journal, Decree No. B/4130/E5/E5.2.1/2019 The Notary Public in Singapore Steffanny Cristine*) *) Notary Public Staff of Lions Corporate in Singapore, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Singapore law, which has its root in English law, has now evolved into a distinctive jurisprudence. It continues to absorb and modify the common law as well as best practices from other mature legal systems. The common law system in Singapore bears material differences from some Asian countries which have imbibed the civil law tradition such as the legal profession. The common law is one important strand of Singapore politico legal fabric. Singapore has inherited the English common law tradition as a part of Anglo Saxon countries and thus enjoys the attendant benefits of stability, certainty and internationalization inherent in the British system. Singapore shares similar English common law roots with some neighbours, such as Malaysia, Brunei, India and Myanmar through the details of the application and implementation will differ according to each country’s specific needs and policies, same goes to the legal professional they are adopted. Keywords: Notary; Implementation; Professional. 1. INTRODUCTION The notary public is the official only authority to make deeds of contracts, deals, or decisions, which are required by the law to be formulated in an authenticated document. Notary is also responsible to set the date of the deed, to save it, to give the legitimate grosse or copies or partial citation of the deeds; as long as the making of the deeds are not tasked to other public officials and are only exclusive duty of the notary1.
    [Show full text]
  • SINGAPORE CHAPTER 4 – the LEGAL PROFESSION Charles LIM
    LEGAL SYSTEMS IN ASEAN – SINGAPORE CHAPTER 4 – THE LEGAL PROFESSION Charles LIM Aeng Cheng Parliamentary Counsel (Special Projects) and Chief Knowledge Officer, Knowledge Management Unit, Attorney-General’s Chambers; Secretary-General, ASEAN Law Association (2003–2006) Revised by Daniel HO Qi Rui Justices’ Law Clerk, Supreme Court of Singapore TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 Fused Profession ......................................................................................................................... 2 Senior Counsel ............................................................................................................................. 2 B. INSTITUTIONS .................................................................................................................... 3 Singapore Institute of Legal Education...................................................................................... 3 Supreme Court of Singapore....................................................................................................... 4 Law Society of Singapore ............................................................................................................ 4 Singapore Academy of Law ......................................................................................................... 5 Attorney-General’s Chambers ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Engaging the Asian Legal Market and Strategies Moving Forward”
    “Engaging the Asian Legal Market and Strategies Moving Forward” William EM Lye 1 Introduction The ‘Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper was released in October 2012. 2 In her foreword to the White Paper, then Prime Minister Julia Gillard was decidedly clear in declaring the rise of Asia in this century and observed, ‘our nation should actively plan for and shape our national future’.3 This paper seeks to provide a brief background to the opportunities available in the Asian legal market and proffer several simple strategies for moving forward. In the December 2013 issue of the Law Institute Journal, Andrew Godwin, the director of transactional law at the Melbourne Law School and associate director of its Asian Law Centre, made a noteworthy observation on some of the changes to the Australian legal landscape that have been brought on by the Asian Century.4 Godwin remarked, in reference to 'the trickle of international firms entering the [Asian legal] market', that 'Australian presence is increasingly viewed as a crucial piece in the global and regional jigsaw puzzle'.5 Beyond his optimism as to the role our legal players have in Asia, what was striking about his observations is that as Australian legal firms embraced the trend towards liberalised legal markets in Asian jurisdictions, this had an effect in our own backyard with the top tier 1 William EM Lye (M Ent Inn, LLM, BSc (Computers), MAICD) is a member of the Victorian Bar and the Chair of the Asia Practice section of the Commercial Bar Association of Victoria. William is also the Principal Representative in Australia for the World Chinese Economic Summit and an Australian Day Ambassador for Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Language, History and the Lawyers' Directives
    ERA Forum (2011) 12: 7–13 DOI 10.1007/s12027-011-0203-2 ARTICLE Language, History and the Lawyers’ Directives David Edward ©ERA2011 Abstract The author highlights the historical context of the creation of the Services and the Establishment Directives and the different concepts of the legal profession(s) in the Member States. With the accession of the UK and Ireland to the then Euro- pean Communities, the European legislator had no longer to deal with a more or less uniform understanding of the role and function of the legal profession. The different concepts are reflected in the different notions used, or formerly used, in the different European jurisdictions. These jurisdictions also differ in their understanding of the legal and judicial, or the legal and notarial, professions as separate or reconcilable careers. Keywords Establishment Directive Services Directive Lawyers Judges Notaries · · · · 1TheNotionoftheLegalProfessionasaChallengeforEuropeanRegulation John Toulmin made a very important contribution to the evolution of the legal pro- fession in Europe. As President of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of the European Union (the CCBE), and earlier as leader of the UK delegation, he brought to a successful conclusion the inter-professional negotiations that led to the directive on the right of establishment for lawyers (the Establishment Directive).1 Although 1Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate prac- tice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained, OJ L 77 of 14 March 1998, p. 36.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Education in Africa: What Type of Lawyer Does Africa Need Samuel O
    McGeorge Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 4 Article 1 1-1-2007 Legal Education in Africa: What Type of Lawyer Does Africa Need Samuel O. Manteaw University of Ghana Faculty of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Samuel O. Manteaw, Legal Education in Africa: What Type of Lawyer Does Africa Need, 39 McGeorge L. Rev. (2016). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr/vol39/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Legal Education in Africa: What Type of Lawyer Does Africa Need?* Samuel 0. Manteaw** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IN TRO DU CTIO N ............................................................................................ 905 A. African Legal Education ....................................................................... 905 1. The B eginning ................................................................................. 905 2. Policy Shift ...................................................................................... 908 B. Scope and Structure of Discussion........................................................ 909 II. OVERVIEW: AFRICA'S LEGAL EDUCATION SYSTEM .................................... 910 A. HistoricalDevelopment ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules
    Law Council of Australia Review of the Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 1 February 2018 LAW COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA DEFENCE RESERVE SERVICE AND DEFENCE SPOUSES LEAVE POLICY 1 Law Council of Australia GPO Box 1989, Canberra, ACT 2601 19 Torrens Street, Braddon, ACT 2612 (02) 6246 3788 © Law Council of Australia 2018 Contents PART A BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose of this Paper .................................................................................................................................. 4 About the Professional Ethics Committee ................................................................................................... 5 Context – Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules ........................................................................................... 5 Context – How are the Rules made and what gives them binding force? .................................................. 6 Context – Commentary to the Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules ......................................................... 10 Context – Relationship to legislation ......................................................................................................... 10 Principles to be applied ............................................................................................................................. 11 Stylistic matters ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]