1270 Lazarenko.Vp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1270 Lazarenko.Vp The Khos-Nelege section of the Ogonor Formation: a potential candidate for the GSSP of Stage 10, Cambrian System NADEZHDA P. LAZARENKO, IVAN Y. GOGIN, TATYANA V. PEGEL &GALINA P. ABAIMOVA The International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy (ISCS) has recommended a subdivision of the Cambrian System into four series and ten stages. The first appearance datum (FAD) of the cosmopolitan agnostoid trilobite Lotagnostus americanus has been chosen as a good indicator for the base of the uppermost Cambrian stage (Stage 10). The Khos-Nelege section located in the north-eastern Siberian Platform (Western Yakutia, Russia) is proposed as the Global Standard Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the ‘Cambrian Stage 10’. The proposed GSSP coin- cides with the FAD of L. americanus at 339 m above the base of the Ogon’or Formation. The section fulfills the geologi- cal and biostratigraphical requirements for a stratotype and the GSSP horizon can be constrained by a number of auxil- iary marker taxa. The first appearance of L. americanus is an easily recognizable level in the Cambrian which can be recognized from all major Cambrian continents, including Baltica, Laurentia, Avalonia, South China and Australia. • Key word: Cambrian, Stage 10, trilobite, GSSP, Lotagnostus americanus, Russia. LAZARENKO, N.P., GOGIN, I.Y., PEGEL, T.V. & ABAIMOVA, G.P. 2011. The Khos-Nelege River section of the Ogon’or Formation: a potential candidate for the GSSP of Stage 10, Cambrian System. Bulletin of Geosciences 86(3), 555–568 (12 figures). Czech Geological Survey. Prague, ISSN 1214-1119. Manuscript received January 1, 2011; accepted in re- vised form July 6, 2011; published online September 19, 2011; issued September 30, 2011. Nadezhda P. Lazarenko, State Enterprise All-Russia Research Institute for Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean, 1 Angliyskiy Prospect, St. Petersburg, 199121, Russia • Ivan Y. Gogin, Russian Geological Research Institute, 74 Sredny Prospect, St. Petersburg, 199106, Russia; [email protected] • Tatyana V. Pegel (corresponding author) & Galina P. Abaimova, Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources, 67 Krasny Pros- pect, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia; [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected] Subdivision of the Cambrian System into series and stages are the Fortunian Stage (= base of Terreneuvian Series and that can be applicable in a global scale is among major ob- Cambrian System), the Drumian Stage, Guzhangian Stage jectives of the International Subcommission on Cambrian and the Paibian Stage (= base of Furongian Series). Apart Stratigraphy (ISCS) for a number of years. The absence of from the Paibian, the two succeeding stages (Cambrian internationally recognized global standard for the Cam- Stage 9 and 10) in the Furongian Series remain to be de- brian System partly a consequence of different stratigrap- fined. In addition, in 2010, Duibian B section in Zhejiang, hical approach developed historically by researches work- China was chosen by the ISCI as GSSP for the base of the ing in different regions, but also reflects faunal Cambrian Stage 9 (= Jiangshanian Stage) defined by the provincialism resulted the scarcity of suitable biostratig- FAD of the agnostoid trilobite Agnostotes orientalis. How- raphical markers applicable for intercontinental correlation ever, this decision is still awaiting ratification from the at the Stage level. However, current progress in research on Commission on Stratigraphy IUGS. Babcock et al. (2005) Cambrian trilobite biostratigraphy in combination with suggested that the FAD of the agnostoid trilobite chemostratigraphy improved significantly long-range cor- Lotagnostus americanus, may be the best choice for defin- relation of the regional Cambrian chronostratigraphic units ing the base of the Cambrian Stage 10, which is the only (Babcock et al. 2005). Furongian Stage remaind awaiting for formal designation The ISCS came to the conclusion that the Cambrian (Fig. 1). System subdivision into four series and ten stages, looks as The main objective of this paper is to present updated the most practical strategy (Babcock et al. 2005). So far, and refined documentation for a stratigraphic sequence only four stages have been formally named and formally through the upper part of the Furongian Series in the Khos- approved by the Commission on Stratigraphy IUGS. These Nelege section which is presented as a GSSP candidate for DOI 10.3140/bull.geosci.1270 555 Bulletin of Geosciences Vol. 86, 3, 2011 border furrow; and presence of posterolateral marginal spines. Based on these criteria, L. obscurus Palmer should be excluded from the synonymy of L. americanus, because it has a nonscrobiculate surface and a short pygidial axis with a rounded posterior termination. This suggests that Lotagnostus obscurus has the closest affinity to the subge- nus Lotagnostus (Eolotagnostus) Zhou. Lotagnostus americanus has a short stratigraphic range in the late Furongian and is a common taxon in the open shelf lithofacies (Peng & Babcock 2005 and references therein) (Fig. 2). Presently, occurrences of L. americanus are docu- mented from Quebec, Newfoundland, Precordilleran Ar- gentina, Sweden, China, Kazakhstan (Malyi Karatau), Kyrgyzstan (north Tien Shan), Australia, Avalonia (Eng- land and Wales), and Siberia (Babcock et al. 2005, Geyer & Shergold 2000, Peng & Babcock 2005, Peng et al. 2005) and it can be identified with precision using multiple lines of evidence. Lotagnostus americanus is widely used as the index taxon in Siberia, China and Scandinavia (Lazarenko et al. 2008, Peng & Babcock 2005, Terfelt et al. 2008). The early representatives of Lotagnostus emerged at the time, when Eurudagnostus and Oncagnostus (Oncagnostus) Figure 1. Chart showing working model for the global chrono- went into extinction or were in terminal decline, and the stratigraphical subdivision of the Cambrian System, indicating the posi- tion of the Cambrian Stage 10 and its lower boundary (modified from agnostoid genus Trilobagnostus had just appeared Babcock et al. 2005). (Ergaliev & Ergaliev 2008, Terfelt et al. 2011, Lazarenko et al. 2008). Lotagnostus (Lotagnostus) americanus occupied an in- designation of the Cambrian System ‘Tenth’ Stage, de- termediate position in the evolution of Lotagnostus. Species fined by the FAD of the agnostoid trilobite Lotagnostus of Lotagnostus (Eolotagnostus), which differ in having americanus. poorly scrobiculate cephalic pleurae (sometimes pygidial pleurae too) and a rounded posterior termination of a rela- tively short pygidial axis, appeared earlier in the sequence Motivation for selection of the boundary than the first representatives of Lotagnostus (Lotagnostus) level and of the potential stratotype section and Lotagnostus (Distagnostus). For instance in China Lo- tagnostus (Eolotagnostus) occurs at the Furrongian Lotag- Lotagnostus (Lotagnostus) americanus (Billings) is easily nostus (Eolotagnostus) decorus-Kaolishaniella Biozone recognizable agnostoid taxon, which was recently revised and Probilacunaspis nasalis-Peichiashania chunanensis by Peng & Babcock (2005). It was demonstrated that a Biozone (Peng 1992), whereas in Kazakhstan (Malyi number of species, including Lotagnostus asiaticus Troeds- Karatau) it is documented from the Lotagnostus son, L. xinjiangensis Zhang, L. punctatus Lu, L. trisectus (Eolotagnostus) scrobicularis-Jegorovaia Biozone (upper (Salter), L. obscurus Palmer and Goniagnostus verrucosus Aksayan Regional Stage) (Ergaliev & Ergaliev 2008). Rusconi represent junior objective synonyms of Lotagnos- The evolutionary lineage of the genus Lotagnostus ter- tus americanus, thus presently this trilobite species is do- minated with L. hedini, which is the index-species of a cumented from almost all major Cambrian paleoconti- biozone designated for the uppermost Furongian in China nents, which makes it a valuable tool for global correlation. (West Zheijang, Peng 1992) and in Kazakhstan (upper part The diagnostic characteristics of Lotagnostus of Batyrbaian Regional Stage of Malyi and Bolshoi Kara- americanus include: lengthwise partition of the axis into tau ranges) (Ergaliev & Ergaliev 2008). In the Batyrbai three parts; pleurae with distinct scrobiculae; cephalon section of the Malyi Karatau Range, Kazakhstan, Lotag- with a narrow roll-shaped border; a pentagonal anterior nostus hedini occurs in the upper part of the Proconodontus glabellar lobe; F3 curved backwards; node on the main notchpeakensis conodont zone (Apollonov & Chugaeva glabellar lobe occupying the most elevated part of the 1983). In the Dadoushen section, Duibian, China, cephalon; elongated basal lobes; presence of a preglabellar Lotagnostus hedini occurs together with the conodonts furrow; a long pygidial axis; medially effaced F1; broad Eoconodontus notchpeakensis and Cordylodus proavus. 556 Nadezhda P. Lazarenko et al. A potential candidate for the GSSP of Stage 10 in Siberia Figure 2. Correlation chart of the upper part of the Cambrian showing the global Cambrian stages compared to regional usage in major areas of the world. The presence of Lotagnostus americanus in a region is indicated by symbol L.a. Chart is compiled from numerous sources, summarized princi- pally in Geyer & Shergold (2000) and Peng et al. (2004). In the same area, the species Lotagnostus americanus margins. Significant depths and uniform sedimentational (= L. punctatus) is common in underlying strata (Lu & Lin settings of basin and deep ramp characterized the region in 1989).
Recommended publications
  • PROGRAMME ABSTRACTS AGM Papers
    The Palaeontological Association 63rd Annual Meeting 15th–21st December 2019 University of Valencia, Spain PROGRAMME ABSTRACTS AGM papers Palaeontological Association 6 ANNUAL MEETING ANNUAL MEETING Palaeontological Association 1 The Palaeontological Association 63rd Annual Meeting 15th–21st December 2019 University of Valencia The programme and abstracts for the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Palaeontological Association are provided after the following information and summary of the meeting. An easy-to-navigate pocket guide to the Meeting is also available to delegates. Venue The Annual Meeting will take place in the faculties of Philosophy and Philology on the Blasco Ibañez Campus of the University of Valencia. The Symposium will take place in the Salon Actos Manuel Sanchis Guarner in the Faculty of Philology. The main meeting will take place in this and a nearby lecture theatre (Salon Actos, Faculty of Philosophy). There is a Metro stop just a few metres from the campus that connects with the centre of the city in 5-10 minutes (Line 3-Facultats). Alternatively, the campus is a 20-25 minute walk from the ‘old town’. Registration Registration will be possible before and during the Symposium at the entrance to the Salon Actos in the Faculty of Philosophy. During the main meeting the registration desk will continue to be available in the Faculty of Philosophy. Oral Presentations All speakers (apart from the symposium speakers) have been allocated 15 minutes. It is therefore expected that you prepare to speak for no more than 12 minutes to allow time for questions and switching between presenters. We have a number of parallel sessions in nearby lecture theatres so timing will be especially important.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Volume
    https://doi.org/10.3301/ABSGI.2019.04 Milano, 2-5 July 2019 ABSTRACT BOOK a cura della Società Geologica Italiana 3rd International Congress on Stratigraphy GENERAL CHAIRS Marco Balini, Università di Milano, Italy Elisabetta Erba, Università di Milano, Italy - past President Società Geologica Italiana 2015-2017 SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Adele Bertini, Peter Brack, William Cavazza, Mauro Coltorti, Piero Di Stefano, Annalisa Ferretti, Stanley C. Finney, Fabio Florindo, Fabrizio Galluzzo, Piero Gianolla, David A.T. Harper, Martin J. Head, Thijs van Kolfschoten, Maria Marino, Simonetta Monechi, Giovanni Monegato, Maria Rose Petrizzo, Claudia Principe, Isabella Raffi, Lorenzo Rook ORGANIZING COMMITTEE The Organizing Committee is composed by members of the Department of Earth Sciences “Ardito Desio” and of the Società Geologica Italiana Lucia Angiolini, Cinzia Bottini, Bernardo Carmina, Domenico Cosentino, Fabrizio Felletti, Daniela Germani, Fabio M. Petti, Alessandro Zuccari FIELD TRIP COMMITTEE Fabrizio Berra, Mattia Marini, Maria Letizia Pampaloni, Marcello Tropeano ABSTRACT BOOK EDITORS Fabio M. Petti, Giulia Innamorati, Bernardo Carmina, Daniela Germani Papers, data, figures, maps and any other material published are covered by the copyright own by the Società Geologica Italiana. DISCLAIMER: The Società Geologica Italiana, the Editors are not responsible for the ideas, opinions, and contents of the papers published; the authors of each paper are responsible for the ideas opinions and con- tents published. La Società Geologica Italiana, i curatori scientifici non sono responsabili delle opinioni espresse e delle affermazioni pubblicate negli articoli: l’autore/i è/sono il/i solo/i responsabile/i. ST3.2 Cambrian stratigraphy, events and geochronology Conveners and Chairpersons Per Ahlberg (Lund University, Sweden) Loren E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ediacaran and Cambrian Stratigraphy in Estonia: an Updated Review
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2017, 66, 3, 152–160 https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2017.12 Ediacaran and Cambrian stratigraphy in Estonia: an updated review Tõnu Meidla Department of Geology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] Received 18 December 2015, accepted 18 May 2017, available online 6 July 2017 Abstract. Previous late Precambrian and Cambrian correlation charts of Estonia, summarizing the regional stratigraphic nomenclature of the 20th century, date back to 1997. The main aim of this review is updating these charts based on recent advances in the global Precambrian and Cambrian stratigraphy and new data from regions adjacent to Estonia. The term ‘Ediacaran’ is introduced for the latest Precambrian succession in Estonia to replace the formerly used ‘Vendian’. Correlation with the dated sections in adjacent areas suggests that only the latest 7–10 Ma of the Ediacaran is represented in the Estonian succession. The gap between the Ediacaran and Cambrian may be rather substantial. The global fourfold subdivision of the Cambrian System is introduced for Estonia. The lower boundary of Series 2 is drawn at the base of the Sõru Formation and the base of Series 3 slightly above the former lower boundary of the ‘Middle Cambrian’ in the Baltic region, marked by a gap in the Estonian succession. The base of the Furongian is located near the base of the Petseri Formation. Key words: Ediacaran, Cambrian, correlation chart, biozonation, regional stratigraphy, Estonia, East European Craton. INTRODUCTION The latest stratigraphic chart of the Cambrian System in Estonia (Mens & Pirrus 1997b, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy
    International Commission on Stratigraphy Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy ANNUAL REPORT 2020 1. TITLE OF CONSTITUENT BODY International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Prepared by: Dr. Anna ŻYLIŃSKA, Secretary, [email protected] Prof. Per AHLBERG, Chair, [email protected] Prof. Loren E. BABCOCK, Chair 2016–2020, [email protected]. Date: 22 November 2020 2. OVERALL OBJECTIVES AND FIT WITHIN IUGS SCIENCE POLICY 2.a. Mission Statement The Subcommission is the primary body for facilitation of international communication and scientific cooperation on Cambrian stratigraphy. 2.b. Goals The two principal goals of the Subcommission are: 1) To develop a global stage-level and series-level chronostratigraphic classification of the Cambrian System. 2) To complete and publish regional and global correlation charts for the Cambrian System. 2.c. Fit within IUGS Science Policy The objectives of the Subcommission fall within three main areas of IUGS policy: 1) The development of an internationally agreed scale of chronostratigraphic units, fully defined by GSSPs where appropriate (stages and series), and related to a hierarchy of units (zones) to maximize relative time resolution within the Cambrian Period. 2) Establishment of frameworks and systems to encourage international collaboration in understanding the evolution of the Earth during the Cambrian Period. 3) Working towards an international policy concerning conservation of geologically and paleontologically important sites such as GSSPs and Fossil-Lagerstätten. 3. ORGANISATION 3.a. Interface with other international projects/groups The Cambrian Subcommission is involved jointly with the Ordovician Subcommission in IGCP Project 653: The onset of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. The Cambrian Subcommission is working jointly with the Ediacaran Subcommission on restudy of the Cambrian base.
    [Show full text]
  • WITSML Lithology Object Usage Guide
    WITSML Lithology Element Usage Guide For WITSML Version 1.4.1 WITSML The Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Mark-up Language (WITSML) consists of XML data-object Overview definitions and a Web services specification developed to promote the right-time, seamless flow of well data between operators and service companies to speed and enhance decision making. Version: Version 1.01 Abstract This document is a guide for implementing and using the lithology element of the mudLog data-object. This lithology element was significantly modified and released as part of WITSML v1.4.1. Prepared by: WITSML SIG Lithology Sub-team Date published: 18 November 2011 Minor revisions January 2012 Document type: Usage Guide Keywords: Data exchange standard, lithology, data, information, qualifier, matrix cement WITSML Lithology Element Usage Guide Document Information DOCUMENT VERSION: 1.01 DATE: January 2012 Technical Language US English Usage, Intellectual Property Rights, and Copyright The material described in this document was developed by and is the intellectual property of Energistics. Energistics develops material for open, public use so that the material is accessible and can be of maximum value to everyone. Use of the material in this document is governed by the Energistics Intellectual Property Policy document and the Product Licensing Agreement, both of which can be found on the Energistics website, http://www.energistics.org/legal-policies. All Energistics published materials are freely available for public comment and use. Anyone may copy and share the materials but must always acknowledge Energistics as the source. No one may restrict use or dissemination of Energistics materials in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • (Re)Proposal of Three Cambrian Subsystems and Their Geochronology
    Article 273 by Ed Landing1*, Gerd Geyer2, Mark D. Schmitz3, Thomas Wotte4, and Artem Kouchinsky5 (Re)proposal of three Cambrian Subsystems and their Geochronology 1 New York State Museum, 222 Madison Avenue, Albany, NY, USA; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Lehrstuhl für Geodynamik und Geomaterialforschung, Institut für Geographie und Geologie, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany 3 Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725, USA 4 Department of Palaeontology, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Bernhard-von-Cotta-Straße, D-09599 Freiberg, Germany 5 Department of Palaeontology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden (Received: April 29, 2020; Revised accepted: September 24, 2020) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020088 The Cambrian is anomalous among geological systems 2018). Following work by the International Subcommission on Cam- as many reports divide it into three divisions of indetermi- brian Stratigraphy (ISCS), these key biotic developments can be related nate rank. This use of “lower”, “middle”, and “upper” has to the chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Cambrian System into been a convenient way to subdivide the Cambrian despite four global series and ten stages (e.g., Babcock, 2005; Babcock and agreement it consists of four global series. Traditional divi- Peng, 2007) complemented by an increasingly precise U-Pb (numeri- sions of the system into regional series (Lower, Middle, cal) geochronology (Fig. 1). This decision at the 2004 ISCS meeting Upper) reflected local biotic developments not interpro- meant that the traditional subdivisions of the Cambrian into regional “Lower,” “Middle,” and “Upper” series (discussed below) were no lon- vincially correlatable with any precision.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 14 February 2019 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Harper, David A.T. and Topper, Timothy P. and Cascales-Mi£nana,Borja and Servais, Thomas and Zhang, Yuan-Dong and Ahlberg, Per (2019) 'The Furongian (late Cambrian) Biodiversity Gap : real or apparent?', Palaeoworld., 28 (1-2). pp. 4-12. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.01.007 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2019 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Accepted Manuscript Title: The Furongian (late Cambrian) Biodiversity Gap: Real or apparent? Authors: David A.T. Harper, Timothy P. Topper, Borja Cascales-Minana,˜ Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoecology of Upper Cambrian Carbonate Units in the House Range and South Lakeside Mountains, Utah
    PALEOECOLOGY OF UPPER CAMBRIAN CARBONATE UNITS, HOUSE RANGE AND SOUTH LAKESIDE MOUNTAINS, UTAH by Patricia K. Garcia A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics The University of Utah December 2015 Copyright © Patricia K. Garcia 2015 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Patricia K. Garcia has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Allan A. Ekdale , Chair 10/02/2015 Date Approved Marjorie Chan , Member 10/02/2015 Date Approved Randall B. Irmis , Member 10/02/2015 Date Approved and by John M. Bartley , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Geology and Geophysics and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Upper Cambrian strata in the Great Basin of western Utah are dominated by marine carbonate facies. The Hellnmaria Member of the Notch Peak Formation in the southern House Range and the Upper Carbonate Member of the St. Charles Formation in the northern South Lakeside Mountains are correlative Upper Cambrian strata. At both localities, the correlative carbonate units preserve cyanobacterical stromatolite facies containing burrows. The Hellnmaria Member and the Upper Carbonate Member both contain smooth walled cylindrical burrows inside and surrounding the stromatolites. The burrows exhibit a branching morphology, and they have a coarser grain fill that is different in texture from surrounding sediments. The branching geometry of the burrow tunnels is irregular and constricted. These are assigned to the trace fossil Thalassinoides paradoxicus.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific/Semantic Data Specification and Dictionaries
    OneGeology-Europe WP3 Data Specification ECP-2007-GEO-317001 OneGeology-Europe Scientific/Semantic Data Specification and Dictionaries - Generic Specification for Spatial Geological Data in Europe - Objective of this document This document represents the OneGeology-Europe Scientific Data Specification produced by Work Package 3. In addition it provides guidance on the vocabulary, the terms, their definitions and their relationships, which must be used by all OneGeology-Europe participants. An introductory explanation of the relevant parts of the GeoSciML data model along with guidance on the usage of GeoSciML is also included to provide initial context. Deliverable number D3.1, Version 2.0 Dissemination level Public Delivery date 31rd August 2010 Status Version 2.0 Author(s) WP3 Leader Kristine Asch WP 3 Core Team M. Bavec, S. Bergman, F. Perez Cerdan, P. Declercq, S. Hennings, D. Janjou, S. Kacer, M. Klicker, J.L. Laxton, M. Nironen, M. Pantaloni, C. Schubert Reviewed by A. Smith This project is funded under the eContentplus programme* A multilingual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, more usable and exploitable --------------------------------------- *OJL 79, 24.03.2005, p.1 02.09.2010 Version 2.0 1/137 OneGeology-Europe WP3 Data Specification Executive Summary OneGeology Europe (1G-E) is delivering a web accessible, semantically and technically interoperable geological dataset, with progress towards harmonisation, for the whole of Europe at 1:1 million scale. This is based on the individual geological datasets held by each geological survey in Europe, and which may differ considerably with respect to their contents, description and geometry. To make these data interoperable is a considerable task and 1G-E Work Package 3 (WP3) is delivering the essential basis for that endeavour: the 1G-E Data Specification.
    [Show full text]
  • Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy
    International Commission on Stratigraphy Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy ANNUAL REPORT 2017 1. TITLE OF CONSTITUENT BODY International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy Prepared by: Prof. Per AHLBERG, Secretary, [email protected] Prof. Loren E. BABCOCK, Chair, [email protected] Date: 1 December 2017 2. OVERALL OBJECTIVES, AND FIT WITHIN IUGS SCIENCE POLICY 2.a. Mission Statement The Subcommission is the primary body for facilitation of international communication and scientific cooperation on Cambrian stratigraphy. 2.b. Goals The two principal goals of the Subcommission are: 1) To develop a global stage-level and series-level chronostratigraphic classification of the Cambrian System. 2) To complete and publish regional and global correlation charts for the Cambrian System. 2.c. Fit within IUGS Science Policy The objectives of the Subcommission fall within three main areas of IUGS policy: 1) The development of an internationally agreed scale of chronostratigraphic units, fully defined by GSSPs where appropriate (stages and series), and related to a hierarchy of units (zones) to maximize relative time resolution within the Cambrian Period. 2) Establishment of frameworks and systems to encourage international collaboration in understanding the evolution of the Earth during the Cambrian Period. 3) Working towards an international policy concerning conservation of geologically and paleontologically important sites such as GSSPs. 1 3. CHIEF ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PRODUCTS IN 2017 3.a. ISECT 2017, Newfoundland, Canada, 15–29 June 2017 The Cambrian Subcommission held its annual meeting in association with the Ediacaran Subcommission (ISES) in June 2017 in St. John’s, Newfoundland. The conference was entitled International Symposium on the Ediacaran–Cambrian Transition 2017 (ISECT 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The First Systematic Description of Cambrian Fossils from Myanmar
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title The first systematic description of Cambrian fossils from Myanmar: Late Furongian trilobites from the southern part of the Shan State and the early Palaeozoic palaeogeographical affinities of Sibumasu Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nm4g6n0 Authors Wernette, Shelly J Hughes, Nigel C Myrow, Paul M et al. Publication Date 2021-07-01 DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104775 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 214 (2021) 104775 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asian Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jseaes The first systematic description of Cambrian fossils from Myanmar: Late Furongian trilobites from the southern part of the Shan State and the early Palaeozoic palaeogeographical affinities of Sibumasu Shelly J. Wernette a,*, Nigel C. Hughes a,b, Paul M. Myrow c, Aye Ko Aung d a Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA b Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 208 B.T. Road, Kolkata 700018, India c Department of Geology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA d Department of Geology, Dagon University, Min-Ye-Kyaw-Swar Road, Dagon Myothit (East), Yangon 11422, Myanmar ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The existence of late Cambrian (Furongian) trilobites in Myanmar (Burma) has been acknowledged since the Burma 1970s, but no formal systematic descriptions of such fossils have been published to date. Herein, we provide such Eosaukia descriptions of some trilobites from the Molohein Group’s Myet-Ye Formation from the Linwe area, Ye-Ngan Asioptychaspis Township of the southern Shan State.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Cambrian Correlation Chart
    Article 321 by Gerd Geyer* A comprehensive Cambrian correlation chart Lehrstuhl für Geodynamik und Geomaterialwissenschaft, Institut für Geographie und Geologie, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany; *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] (Received: June 7, 2019; Revised accepted: November 8, 2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2019/019026 The International Subcommission on Cambrian Stra- relation. The long period between the introduction of the Jiangsha- tigraphy has introduced a number of internal subdivisions nian in 2012 and the Miaolingian/Wuliuan in 2018 indicates the (i.e., series and stages), but most of the explanatory pub- growing difficulties to arrive at a readily acceptable horizon. The rea- lications lack reliable data on the correlation between all sons for these difficulties can be seen in real difficulties based on the Cambrian key continents. A comprehensive correlation chart presence/absence of biostratigraphically useful fossils; gaps/hiatuses is presented here to review and document correlatable in the successions; and simply a lack of data. In many cases, however, biostratigraphic horizons within the system and correlation the difficulties result from differing taxonomic concepts; incomplete knowledge on the data of regions other than the specialties of the sci- of biostratigraphic zones and regional series and stages, entist’s particular working area; or even biased, nationalistic views accompanied by explanatory remarks. The chart also pres- that led to erroneous correlations. ents important available non-biological correlation data, such as carbon isotope signatures and radiometric ages. Preliminary remarks Introduction In order to provide a sound base for future discussions on the stra- tigraphy of the Cambrian, a comprehensive correlation table is pre- In 1999, the officers of International Subcommission on Cambrian sented here for all key areas with Cambrian successions.
    [Show full text]