Automated Machine Learning for Healthcare and Clinical Notes Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mapreduce-Based D ELT Framework to Address the Challenges of Geospatial Big Data
International Journal of Geo-Information Article MapReduce-Based D_ELT Framework to Address the Challenges of Geospatial Big Data Junghee Jo 1,* and Kang-Woo Lee 2 1 Busan National University of Education, Busan 46241, Korea 2 Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon 34129, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-51-500-7327 Received: 15 August 2019; Accepted: 21 October 2019; Published: 24 October 2019 Abstract: The conventional extracting–transforming–loading (ETL) system is typically operated on a single machine not capable of handling huge volumes of geospatial big data. To deal with the considerable amount of big data in the ETL process, we propose D_ELT (delayed extracting–loading –transforming) by utilizing MapReduce-based parallelization. Among various kinds of big data, we concentrate on geospatial big data generated via sensors using Internet of Things (IoT) technology. In the IoT environment, update latency for sensor big data is typically short and old data are not worth further analysis, so the speed of data preparation is even more significant. We conducted several experiments measuring the overall performance of D_ELT and compared it with both traditional ETL and extracting–loading– transforming (ELT) systems, using different sizes of data and complexity levels for analysis. The experimental results show that D_ELT outperforms the other two approaches, ETL and ELT. In addition, the larger the amount of data or the higher the complexity of the analysis, the greater the parallelization effect of transform in D_ELT, leading to better performance over the traditional ETL and ELT approaches. Keywords: ETL; ELT; big data; sensor data; IoT; geospatial big data; MapReduce 1. -
10 Oriented Principal Component Analysis for Feature Extraction
10 Oriented Principal Component Analysis for Feature Extraction Abstract- Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is a popular unsupervised learning technique that is often used in pattern recognition for feature extraction. Some variants have been proposed for supervising PCA to include class information, which are usually based on heuristics. A more principled approach is presented in this paper. Suppose that we have a pattern recogniser composed of a linear network for feature extraction and a classifier. Instead of designing each module separately, we perform global training where both learning systems cooperate in order to find those components (Oriented PCs) useful for classification. Experimental results, using artificial and real data, show the potential of the proposed learning system for classification. Since the linear neural network finds the optimal directions to better discriminate classes, the global-trained pattern recogniser needs less Oriented PCs (OPCs) than PCs so the classifier’s complexity (e.g. capacity) is lower. In this way, the global system benefits from a better generalisation performance. Index Terms- Oriented Principal Components Analysis, Principal Components Neural Networks, Co-operative Learning, Learning to Learn Algorithms, Feature Extraction, Online gradient descent, Pattern Recognition, Compression. Abbreviations- PCA- Principal Components Analysis, OPC- Oriented Principal Components, PCNN- Principal Components Neural Networks. 1. Introduction In classification, observations belong to different classes. Based on some prior knowledge about the problem and on the training set, a pattern recogniser is constructed for assigning future observations to one of the existing classes. The typical method of building this system consists in dividing it into two main blocks that are usually trained separately: the feature extractor and the classifier. -
A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning a Big Data - AI Integration Perspective
1 A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning A Big Data - AI Integration Perspective Yuji Roh, Geon Heo, Steven Euijong Whang, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—Data collection is a major bottleneck in machine learning and an active research topic in multiple communities. There are largely two reasons data collection has recently become a critical issue. First, as machine learning is becoming more widely-used, we are seeing new applications that do not necessarily have enough labeled data. Second, unlike traditional machine learning, deep learning techniques automatically generate features, which saves feature engineering costs, but in return may require larger amounts of labeled data. Interestingly, recent research in data collection comes not only from the machine learning, natural language, and computer vision communities, but also from the data management community due to the importance of handling large amounts of data. In this survey, we perform a comprehensive study of data collection from a data management point of view. Data collection largely consists of data acquisition, data labeling, and improvement of existing data or models. We provide a research landscape of these operations, provide guidelines on which technique to use when, and identify interesting research challenges. The integration of machine learning and data management for data collection is part of a larger trend of Big data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration and opens many opportunities for new research. Index Terms—data collection, data acquisition, data labeling, machine learning F 1 INTRODUCTION E are living in exciting times where machine learning expertise. This problem applies to any novel application that W is having a profound influence on a wide range of benefits from machine learning. -
Best Practices in Data Collection and Preparation: Recommendations For
Feature Topic on Reviewer Resources Organizational Research Methods 2021, Vol. 24(4) 678–\693 ª The Author(s) 2019 Best Practices in Data Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Collection and Preparation: DOI: 10.1177/1094428119836485 journals.sagepub.com/home/orm Recommendations for Reviewers, Editors, and Authors Herman Aguinis1 , N. Sharon Hill1, and James R. Bailey1 Abstract We offer best-practice recommendations for journal reviewers, editors, and authors regarding data collection and preparation. Our recommendations are applicable to research adopting dif- ferent epistemological and ontological perspectives—including both quantitative and qualitative approaches—as well as research addressing micro (i.e., individuals, teams) and macro (i.e., organizations, industries) levels of analysis. Our recommendations regarding data collection address (a) type of research design, (b) control variables, (c) sampling procedures, and (d) missing data management. Our recommendations regarding data preparation address (e) outlier man- agement, (f) use of corrections for statistical and methodological artifacts, and (g) data trans- formations. Our recommendations address best practices as well as transparency issues. The formal implementation of our recommendations in the manuscript review process will likely motivate authors to increase transparency because failure to disclose necessary information may lead to a manuscript rejection decision. Also, reviewers can use our recommendations for developmental purposes to highlight which particular issues should be improved in a revised version of a manuscript and in future research. Taken together, the implementation of our rec- ommendations in the form of checklists can help address current challenges regarding results and inferential reproducibility as well as enhance the credibility, trustworthiness, and usefulness of the scholarly knowledge that is produced. -
Feature Selection/Extraction
Feature Selection/Extraction Dimensionality Reduction Feature Selection/Extraction • Solution to a number of problems in Pattern Recognition can be achieved by choosing a better feature space. • Problems and Solutions: – Curse of Dimensionality: • #examples needed to train classifier function grows exponentially with #dimensions. • Overfitting and Generalization performance – What features best characterize class? • What words best characterize a document class • Subregions characterize protein function? – What features critical for performance? – Subregions characterize protein function? – Inefficiency • Reduced complexity and run-time – Can’t Visualize • Allows ‘intuiting’ the nature of the problem solution. Curse of Dimensionality Same Number of examples Fill more of the available space When the dimensionality is low Selection vs. Extraction • Two general approaches for dimensionality reduction – Feature extraction: Transforming the existing features into a lower dimensional space – Feature selection: Selecting a subset of the existing features without a transformation • Feature extraction – PCA – LDA (Fisher’s) – Nonlinear PCA (kernel, other varieties – 1st layer of many networks Feature selection ( Feature Subset Selection ) Although FS is a special case of feature extraction, in practice quite different – FSS searches for a subset that minimizes some cost function (e.g. test error) – FSS has a unique set of methodologies Feature Subset Selection Definition Given a feature set x={xi | i=1…N} find a subset xM ={xi1, xi2, …, xiM}, with M<N, that optimizes an objective function J(Y), e.g. P(correct classification) Why Feature Selection? • Why not use the more general feature extraction methods? Feature Selection is necessary in a number of situations • Features may be expensive to obtain • Want to extract meaningful rules from your classifier • When you transform or project, measurement units (length, weight, etc.) are lost • Features may not be numeric (e.g. -
Feature Extraction (PCA & LDA)
Feature Extraction (PCA & LDA) CE-725: Statistical Pattern Recognition Sharif University of Technology Spring 2013 Soleymani Outline What is feature extraction? Feature extraction algorithms Linear Methods Unsupervised: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Also known as Karhonen-Loeve (KL) transform Supervised: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) Also known as Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis (FDA) 2 Dimensionality Reduction: Feature Selection vs. Feature Extraction Feature selection Select a subset of a given feature set Feature extraction (e.g., PCA, LDA) A linear or non-linear transform on the original feature space ⋮ ⋮ → ⋮ → ⋮ = ⋮ Feature Selection Feature ( <) Extraction 3 Feature Extraction Mapping of the original data onto a lower-dimensional space Criterion for feature extraction can be different based on problem settings Unsupervised task: minimize the information loss (reconstruction error) Supervised task: maximize the class discrimination on the projected space In the previous lecture, we talked about feature selection: Feature selection can be considered as a special form of feature extraction (only a subset of the original features are used). Example: 0100 X N 4 XX' 0010 X' N 2 Second and thirth features are selected 4 Feature Extraction Unsupervised feature extraction: () () A mapping : ℝ →ℝ ⋯ Or = ⋮⋱⋮ Feature Extraction only the transformed data () () () () ⋯ ′ ⋯′ = ⋮⋱⋮ () () ′ ⋯′ Supervised feature extraction: () () A mapping : ℝ →ℝ ⋯ Or = ⋮⋱⋮ Feature Extraction only the transformed -
Feature Extraction for Image Selection Using Machine Learning
Master of Science Thesis in Electrical Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, 2017 Feature extraction for image selection using machine learning Matilda Lorentzon Master of Science Thesis in Electrical Engineering Feature extraction for image selection using machine learning Matilda Lorentzon LiTH-ISY-EX--17/5097--SE Supervisor: Marcus Wallenberg ISY, Linköping University Tina Erlandsson Saab Aeronautics Examiner: Lasse Alfredsson ISY, Linköping University Computer Vision Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Copyright © 2017 Matilda Lorentzon Abstract During flights with manned or unmanned aircraft, continuous recording can result in a very high number of images to analyze and evaluate. To simplify image analysis and to minimize data link usage, appropriate images should be suggested for transfer and further analysis. This thesis investigates features used for selection of images worthy of further analysis using machine learning. The selection is done based on the criteria of having good quality, salient content and being unique compared to the other selected images. The investigation is approached by implementing two binary classifications, one regard- ing content and one regarding quality. The classifications are made using support vector machines. For each of the classifications three feature extraction methods are performed and the results are compared against each other. The feature extraction methods used are histograms of oriented gradients, features from the discrete cosine transform domain and features extracted from a pre-trained convolutional neural network. The images classified as both good and salient are then clustered based on similarity measures retrieved using color coherence vectors. One image from each cluster is retrieved and those are the result- ing images from the image selection. -
The Risks of Using Spreadsheets for Statistical Analysis Why Spreadsheets Have Their Limits, and What You Can Do to Avoid Them
The risks of using spreadsheets for statistical analysis Why spreadsheets have their limits, and what you can do to avoid them Let’s go Introduction Introduction Spreadsheets are widely used for statistical analysis; and while they are incredibly useful tools, they are Why spreadsheets are popular useful only to a certain point. When used for a task 88% of all spreadsheets they’re not designed to perform, or for a task at contain at least one error or beyond the limit of their capabilities, spread- sheets can be somewhat risky. An alternative to spreadsheets This paper presents some points you should consider if you use, or plan to use, a spread- sheet to perform statistical analysis. It also describes an alternative that in many cases will be more suitable. The learning curve with IBM SPSS Statistics Software licensing the SPSS way Conclusion Introduction Why spreadsheets are popular Why spreadsheets are popular A spreadsheet is an attractive choice for performing The answer to the first question depends on the scale and calculations because it’s easy to use. Most of us know (or the complexity of your data analysis. A typical spreadsheet 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 think we know) how to use one. Plus, spreadsheet programs will have a restriction on the number of records it can 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 come as a standard desktop computer resource, so they’re handle, so if the scale of the job is large, a tool other than a already available. spreadsheet may be very useful. A spreadsheet is a wonderful invention and an An alternative to spreadsheets excellent tool—for certain jobs. -
Data Migration (Pdf)
PTS Data Migration 1 Contents 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Challenge ......................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Legacy Data Extraction ............................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Data Cleansing......................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Data Linking ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.4 Data Mapping .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.5 New Data Preparation & Load ................................................................................................ 3 3.6 Legacy Data Retention ............................................................................................................ 4 4 Solution ........................................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Legacy Data Extraction ............................................................................................................ 5 4.2 Data Cleansing........................................................................................................................ -
Time Series Feature Extraction for Industrial Big Data (Iiot) Applications
Time Series Feature Extraction for Industrial Big Data (IIoT) Applications [1] Term paper for the subject „Current Topics of Data Engineering” In the course of studies MSc. Data Engineering at the Jacobs University Bremen Markus Sun Born on 07.11.1994 in Achim Student/ Registration number: 30003082 1. Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Adalbert F.X. Wilhelm 2. Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Stefan Kettemann Time Series Feature Extraction for Industrial Big Data (IIoT) Applications __________________________________________________________________________ Table of Content Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 2 Main Topic - Terminology ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Sensor Data .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Feature Selection and Feature Extraction...................................................... 5 2.2.1 Variance Threshold.............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Correlation Threshold .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) .................................................................................. 7 2.2.4 Linear Discriminant Analysis -
Machine Learning Feature Extraction Based on Binary Pixel Quantification Using Low-Resolution Images for Application of Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Apple Orchards
agronomy Article Machine Learning Feature Extraction Based on Binary Pixel Quantification Using Low-Resolution Images for Application of Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Apple Orchards Hong-Kun Lyu 1,*, Sanghun Yun 1 and Byeongdae Choi 1,2 1 Division of Electronics and Information System, ICT Research Institute, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Korea; [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (B.C.) 2 Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-53-785-3550 Received: 20 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: Deep learning and machine learning (ML) technologies have been implemented in various applications, and various agriculture technologies are being developed based on image-based object recognition technology. We propose an orchard environment free space recognition technology suitable for developing small-scale agricultural unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) autonomous mobile equipment using a low-cost lightweight processor. We designed an algorithm to minimize the amount of input data to be processed by the ML algorithm through low-resolution grayscale images and image binarization. In addition, we propose an ML feature extraction method based on binary pixel quantification that can be applied to an ML classifier to detect free space for autonomous movement of UGVs from binary images. Here, the ML feature is extracted by detecting the local-lowest points in segments of a binarized image and by defining 33 variables, including local-lowest points, to detect the bottom of a tree trunk. We trained six ML models to select a suitable ML model for trunk bottom detection among various ML models, and we analyzed and compared the performance of the trained models. -
Advanced Data Preparation for Individuals & Teams
WRANGLER PRO Advanced Data Preparation for Individuals & Teams Assess & Refine Data Faster FILES DATA VISUALIZATION Data preparation presents the biggest opportunity for organizations to uncover not only new levels of efciency but DATABASES REPORTING also new sources of value. CLOUD MACHINE LEARNING Wrangler Pro accelerates data preparation by making the process more intuitive and efcient. The Wrangler Pro edition API INPUTS DATA SCIENCE is specifically tailored to the needs of analyst teams and departmental use cases. It provides analysts the ability to connect to a broad range of data sources, schedule workflows to run on a regular basis and freely share their work with colleagues. Key Benefits Work with Any Data: Users can prepare any type of data, regardless of shape or size, so that it can be incorporated into their organization’s analytics eforts. Improve Efciency: Make the end-to-end process of data preparation up to 10X more efcient compared to traditional methods using excel or hand-code. By utilizing the latest techniques in data visualization and machine learning, Wrangler Pro visibly surfaces data quality issues and guides users through the process of preparing their data. Accelerate Data Onboarding: Whether developing analysis for internal consumption or analysis to be consumed by an end customer, Wrangler Pro enables analysts to more efciently incorporate unfamiliar external data into their project. Users are able to visually explore, clean and join together new data Reduce data Improve data sources in a repeatable workflow to improve the efciency and preparation time quality and quality of their work. by up to 90% trust in analysis WRANGLER PRO Why Wrangler Pro? Ease of Deployment: Wrangler Pro utilizes a flexible cloud- based deployment that integrates with leading cloud providers “We invested in Trifacta to more efciently such as Amazon Web Services.