Overview of Document Management Technology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Document-Centered User Interfaces & Object-Oriented Programming
T HE Vol. 1, No. 6 January/February G ILBANE1994 ™ Publisher: Publishing Technology Management, Inc. Applelink: PTM REPOR (617) 643-8855 Editor: T Frank Gilbane on Open Information & Document Systems [email protected] (617) 643-8855 Subscriptions: It may not seem these two Carolyn Fine DOCUMENT-CENTERED USER INTERFACES & [email protected] topics have much to do (617) 643-8855 OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING — HOW with each other at first, but Design & Production: WILL THEY AFFECT YOU? together they will have a Catherine Maccora profound affect on how we (617) 241-7816 use computers in everyday business environments. You can get a glimpse of where this is Associate Editor: Chip Canty all headed by looking at some existing document management software and operating [email protected] system features. In this issue Keith Dawson explains why these two trends are important, (617) 265-6263 how they relate to each other, and how we can expect their convergence to affect our Contributing Editor: Rebecca Hansen development and use of software for business applications. MCI Mail: 4724078 This issue also sets the stage for a future article analyzing the compound document (617) 859-9540 architectures that will be vying for dominance in the next generation document computing environments. NNIVERSARY SSUE It seems hard to believe, but with this issue we conclude our first A I year of publication. It has been an exciting year for us, and we look forward to another year of keeping you up-to-date on the issues and technology for managing documents and document information. In our next (anniversary) issue we will look at how Andersen Consulting helped the State of Wisconsin Legislature reengineer their entire document workflow and management process, and put together a document management application that involved integrating multiple document management products. -
Universität Karlsruhe – Fakultät Für Informatik – Bibliothek – Postfach 6980 – 76128 Karlsruhe
Universität Karlsruhe – Fakultät für Informatik – Bibliothek – Postfach 6980 – 76128 Karlsruhe Software-Komponentenmodelle – Seminar im Wintersemester 2006/2007 an der Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut für Programmstrukturen und Datenorganisation, Lehrstuhl für Software-Entwurf und -Qualität Herausgeber: Steffen Becker, Jens Happe, Heiko Koziolek, Klaus Krogmann, Michael Kuperberg, Ralf Reussner Interner Bericht 2007-10 Universität Karlsruhe Fakultät für Informatik ISSN 1432 - 7864 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Open-Source Component Models: Bonobo and KParts 5 Sebastian Reichelt The Palladio Component Model 25 Erik Burger The SOFA Component Model 45 Igor Goussev Das Koala Komponentenmodell 67 Dimitar Hodzhev XPCOM Cross Platform Component Object Model 88 Fouad ben Nasr Omri 3 4 Open-Source Component Models: Bonobo and KParts Sebastian Reichelt Supervisor: Michael Kuperberg Karlsruhe University, Karlsruhe, Germany Abstract. Most modern desktop computers are controlled via graphical user interfaces. For different tasks, the user usually has to start separate programs with visually separated user interfaces. Complex tasks require either large monolithic programs or the possibility to reuse part of the functionality provided by one program in another. Such reuse can be achieved using component frameworks, which may be generic or special- ized for graphical applications. In Microsoft Windows, OLE is a widely known specialized component framework built on top of the generic COM framework. The open-source desktop systems GNOME and KDE support graphical components us- ing the Bonobo and KParts subsystems, respectively. This paper is an analysis of these two open-source component frameworks. Despite similar goals, Bonobo and KParts are designed and implemented very differently. In this paper, they are compared from a user’s, program- mer’s, and system architect’s point of view. -
Locah"CONANERPAR SHARED O CONTENT PAR SERVER 112 Pitchpart EDITOR
USOO6681371B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,681,371 B1 Devanbu (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 20, 2004 (54) SYSTEMAND METHOD FOR USING (56) References Cited CONTAINER DOCUMENTS AS MULTI-USER DOMAIN CLIENTS U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventor: Premkumar T. Devanbu, Davis, CA 4,933,880 A * 6/1990 Borgendale et al. ........ 71.5/515 5,781,732 A * 7/1998 Adams ....................... 709/205 (US) 5,870.764 A * 2/1999 Lo et al. ..................... 707/203 6,054,985 A * 4/2000 Morgan et al. ............. 345/804 (73) Assignee: AT&T Corp., New York, NY (US) 6,263.379 B1 * 7/2001 Atkinson et al. ........... 709/332 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 * cited by examiner U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Primary Examiner Hoang-Vu. Antony Nguyen-Ba (21) Appl. No.: 09/469,169 ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Dec. 21, 1999 (57) A multi-user domain is implemented in a compound docu Related U.S. Application Data ment framework to collaboratively modify a compound (60) Provisional application No. 60/113,233, filed on Dec. 21, document in accordance with a concurrency model. A Server 1998. hosts a multi-user domain in which a plurality of clients (51) Int. Cl............................ G06F 15700; G06F 9/44; participate. The multi-user domain includes a compound G06F 9/00 document having a shared container part and at least one (52) U.S. Cl. ........................ 715/515; 717/123; 709/328 shared content part. Each participating client can use its own (58) Field of Search ................................ -
A Document-Centric Component Framework for Document Distributions
A Document-centric Component Framework for Document Distributions Ichiro Satoh National Institute of Informatics 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8430, Japan Abstract. This paper presents a framework for building and managing com- pound documents in distributed systems. It enables an enriched document to be dynamically and nestedly composed of software components corresponding to various types of content, e.g., text, images, and windows. It permits the content of each component and program code to access the content inseparable inside the components so that the components can be viewed or modified without the need for any applications. It enables each component or document to migrate over a network under its own control by using mobile agent technology. Moreover, it in- troduces components as carriers or forwarders because it enables them to carry or transmit other components as first class objects to other locations. It offers sev- eral basic operations for network processing, e.g., forwarding, duplication, and synchronization. Since these operations are still document components, they can be dynamically deployed and customized at local or remote computers through GUI manipulations. It therefore allows an end-user to easily and rapidly configure network processing in the same way as if he/she had edited the documents. This paper describes the framework and its implementation, which currently uses Java as the implementation language as well as a component development language, and then illustrates several interesting applications that demonstrate its utility and flexibility. 1 Introduction Document manipulation, such as editing, viewing, and distributing documents, is still playing a crucial role in modern information processing. -
A Characterization of Compound Documents on the Web
A Characterization of Compound Documents on the Web Eyal de Lara†, Dan S. Wallach‡, and Willy Zwaenepoel‡ † Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ‡ Department of Computer Science Rice University Abstract 3. For small documents, XML format produces much larger documents than OLE. For large Recent developments in office productivity suites documents, there is little difference. make it easier for users to publish rich compound documents on the Web. Compound documents ap- 4. Compression considerably reduces the size of pear as a single unit of information but may con- documents in both formats. tain data generated by different applications, such as text, images, and spreadsheets. Given the popu- 1 Introduction larity enjoyed by these office suites and the perva- siveness of the Web as a publication medium, we Productivity tools, often part of “office suites,” are expect that in the near future these compound doc- the most popular applications for creating docu- uments will become an increasing proportion of the ments. Their popularity derives, to some extent, from Web’s content. As a result, the content handled by their capability to create compound documents that servers, proxies, and browsers may change consider- include data from more than one application. ably from what is currently observed. Furthermore, The documents produced by office suites have these compound documents are currently treated as been, until recently, very unwieldy for putting on the opaque byte streams, but future Web infrastructure Web. These documents can be quite large, some- may wish to understand their internal structure to times hundreds of kilobytes, and Web browsers do provide higher-quality service.