Digestive Physiology ……………………………………………………………

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Digestive Physiology …………………………………………………………… The seasonal energetics of three species of Australian tropical frogs (Anura: Hylidae). Lorrae Jean McArthur B. Sc. (Hons) (Monash) Faculty of Education, Health and Science Charles Darwin University A thesis submitted to satisfy the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Science) March 2007 Declaration "I hereby declare that the work herein, now submitted as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Professional Doctorate of the Charles Darwin University, is the result of my own investigations, and all references to ideas and work of other researchers have been specifically acknowledged. I herby certify that the work embodied in this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not being currently submitted in candidature for any other degree." Signed: Date: ii This dissertation is dedicated in memory of Daniel Frederick McArthur (1927-2004) iii Acknowledgments The Commonwealth Government kindly provided me with an Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship, and tuition was gratefully received from Charles Darwin University (CDU). The Australian Federation of University Women for South Australia (2003) and the Northern Territory (2002) also graciously provided scholarships. Internal funding to conduct research was provided by the Charles Darwin University, under the Undergraduate Training Research Opportunity Program of the Faculty of Education, Health and Science, and in part from Keith Christian’s Australian Research Council grant. External funding to conduct research was gratefully received from the Australian Society of Herpetologists (2004), Peter Rankin Trust Fund (2003), Centre for Tropical Wetland Management of CDU (2003 and 2002), Australian Geographic (2002) and Linnean Society of New South Wales (2002). All applicable institutional Animal Care guidelines were complied with and all required permits were obtained. All methods were approved by the Charles Darwin University Animal Ethics Committee (project reference number A01020). I gratefully acknowledge the services of the Parks and Wildlife Services of Northern Territory for allowing me to collect and conduct research on frogs (permit reference numbers 13390 and 17225). Technical assistance was extraordinary and greatly appreciated. Gavin Bedford assisted in calorimetry methods; Mark Meekan of the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) allowed the use of the image analysis program Optimas; Ellie Hayward and Yusuke Fukuda both assisted in frog tissue preparation and analyses; varied assistance was provided by the Technical Services staff of the School of Science; Keith McGuiness reminded me of basic math skills; and the interaction among the many wonderful staff, students and researchers that I have had the pleasure of meeting and working with during my time at CDU. Wendy Telfer, Chris Tracy, Timothy Schultz and Gavin Bedford kindly provided editorial comments, and Sebastian Iglesias and Colin Trainor reviewed final drafts. Work associates Jeanne Young, Chris Tracy and Steven Reynolds, and the many enthusiastic field volunteers, Sally Kent, Jenny Brazier, James Smith, iv Jenny Kapp, Nicola Buddle, Scott Wyatt, Peter Clifton, David Rose, Kate Goodrich, Robert Bednarik, Murray Burke, Anna Chard, Chris Haynes, Birgit Hallenstein, Sommer Jenkins, Yeni Mulyani, Penny Wurm, Wendy Telfer, Valerie Boll, Geoffrey Carr, Petra Mross, Fiona Morrow, and Graham Chamber are greatly appreciated for the many late hours that they spent catching frogs in all weather conditions. Special acknowledgements go to my supervisor, Keith Christian, for research direction, technical support and unwavering assistance during the writing phase of my research. Michael Guinea unknowingly mentored and encouraged me alongside my sisters, Sonya McKenzie and Danielle McLachlan. Furthermore, I am grateful to Birgit Hallenstein, Wendy Telfer, Jennifer Koenig, Sebastian Iglesias and Brett Murphy who supplied me with unbounding enthusiasm and encouragement over the course of this endeavour, and to Ron Firth, Chris Brady, Yeni Mulyani, Gillian McCloskey, and Colin Trainor for unique in-office amusement and provisions. v Table of Contents Abstract ………………………………………..…………….…..………….………1 Chapter 1. General introduction and background …………………….…………..…..… 2 1.1 Physiological constraints of Australian frogs ………….…………….………….……….. 3 1.1.1 The Australian climate: the need for adaptation? ………………………....…........ 3 1.1.1.1 Frogs adapted to temperate climate ……...……..…………...……….… 5 1.1.1.2 Frogs adapted to desert climate …………………………....……….….. 5 1.1.1.3 Frogs adapted to tropical climate ………….….………….....………….. 6 1.2 Wet-dry tropics ….………………...………………………...……………....…………… 7 1.2.1 Climate of the wet-dry tropics ……………………………….……………..……. 7 1.2.2 Frogs of the wet-dry tropics – Family Hylidae ……………...…………………… 8 1.2.2.1 Cyclorana australis ……………………………………..……………… 9 1.2.2.2 Litoria caerulea ……………….……………………….………………. 9 1.2.2.3 Litoria dahlii ……………………….……………………….…………. 9 1.2.3 Some habitat assemblages of frogs in the wet-dry tropics ……...……………….. 10 1.2.3.1 Lowland wetland (Howard River) ……………………………..……. 10 1.2.3.2 Lowland wetlands (Knuckey Lagoons) ……...……….…….………… 11 1.2.3.3 Lowland woodland (Mickett Creek) …...…….…………….…………. 11 1.2.3.4 Dry coastal vine forest (East Point) …....………………………….….. 12 1.3 Scope and aims of the dissertation ……………...……...………..……….…………….. 13 1.3.1 Frog ecology ……………………………………..……………….……………... 14 1.3.2 Digestive physiology ……………………………………………………………. 14 1.3.3 Gastrointestinal flexibility ………………………..………………………..……. 15 1.3.4 Respiratory physiology …………………………..………………………...……. 16 1.3.5 Energy flow ……………………………………...………………………………. 17 1.4 Bibliography …………………………………………...……..………………………… 19 Chapter 2. Seasonal ecology ………………...…………………….……………….. 24 2.1 Abstract …………………………………………………...……..………...………….... 25 2.2 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….………..... 26 2.3 Materials and Methods ……………………………………..………………………...… 28 2.3.1 Experimental protocol ………………………………….……………………..… 28 2.3.2 Visual encounter surveys of seasonal frog activity………..…………………….. 28 2.3.3 Measurements of frog body temperature when active using field sampling…… 29 2.3.3.1 Measurements of microclimate during field sampling………..…….. 30 2.3.4 Measurements of frog body temperature when not active using radio telemetry .. 30 2.3.4.1 Measurements of microclimate during radio telemetry ……………….. 31 2.3.4.2 Surgical procedures ………………………………………….…...…… 31 2.3.5 Statistical analyses ………………...……………………………….………...….. 33 2.4 Results …………………………….……………………………..………………….….. 34 2.4.1 Seasonal frog activity and climatic variables ………….…………………...…… 34 2.4.2 Relationship between frog activity and climatic variables ….……….....………. 35 2.4.3 General spatial use of microhabitat when active ………………….………..…… 35 2.4.4 Refuge sites of frogs when not active ………………...…………………..….…. 37 vi 2.4.5 The average night and day seasonal Tb of frogs and associated microclimate ….. 38 2.4.6 Correlations between frog Tb and microclimate …………………..………….…. 39 2.5 Discussion ………………………………………………………………………….…... 41 2.6 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………….…... 46 Chapter 3. Digestive Physiology ………………………...….……………...………. 50 3.1 Abstract ……………………………………………………………………..….………. 51 3.2 Introduction …………………………………………………………….……...……….. 52 3.3 Materials and Methods …………………….……………………………….………..…. 54 3.3.1 Experimental protocol ………….…………………………………………..…… 54 3.3.2 Calorimetry ………………………………………………...……………………. 56 3.3.3 Statistical analyses ………………………………………………….…………… 57 3.4 Results ………………………………………………………………………………..… 58 3.4.1 Temperature effect on PT …………………………………………………..…… 58 3.4.2 Seasonal effect on PT ……………………………………………..……...……… 58 3.4.3 Temperature effect on DE …………………………………………………..…… 59 3.4.4 Seasonal effect on DE ………………………………………….…...…………… 60 3.4.5 Field fecal analysis …………………………………………...…..……………… 60 3.5 Discussion …………………………………………………………...…………………. 64 3.6 Bibliography ………………………………………………………..……………..……. 67 Chapter 4. Gastrointestinal Flexibility ……………..……………….…………..…. 70 4.1 Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………...…. 71 4.2 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………....…….. 72 4.3 Materials and Methods …………………………………………………………....……. 75 4.3.1 Experimental protocol ………………………………………………...………… 75 4.3.2 Morphology …………………………………………………………………..…. 75 4.3.3 Histology …………………………………………………………………...……. 76 4.3.4 Statistical analyses ……………………………………………...…..…………… 78 4.4 Results ……………………………………………………………………………..…… 79 4.4.1 Morphology …………………………………………………...………………… 79 4.4.2 Histology ……………..…………………………………………..……………… 80 4.4.3 Correlations between intestinal mass and histology ………………….….……… 81 4.5 Discussion ………………………………………………………………...……………. 84 4.6 Bibliography ………………………………………………………...…….……………. 88 Chapter 5. Seasonal Respiratory Physiology ………………...……...……..………. 90 5.1 Abstract ………………………………….…………….…………..………...…………. 91 5.2 Introduction ………………………………..………………………………………..….. 92 5.3 Materials and Methods …………………..…………………………………………..…. 95 5.3.1 Experimental protocol …………………………….………………………..…… 95 5.3.2 Experimental treatments …………………………………………...……………. 96 5.3.3 Statistical analyses ……………………..………...……………………………… 98 5.4 Results ………………………………………………………………………………… 100 5.4.1 Aestivation ………………………..………………………………….………… 100 5.4.2 Recovery ………………………..……………………………………………… 102 5.4.3 Wet and dry season, fed versus unfed …………………………………….…… 103 vii 5.4.4 Fully hydrated versus 70% hydrated …………………………………………... 104 5.5 Discussion ………………………..………………………………..….………………. 106 5.6 Bibliography …………………………..………………………………………………. 109 Chapter 6.
Recommended publications
  • Jack Lakes Appendices 140309.Indd
    Jack Lakes Wetlands Biodiversity Assessment, November 2007 & June 2008 CYMAG Environmental Inc. March 2009 APPENDICES CYMAG Environmental TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A Jack Lakes Vegetation and Fauna from Qld Museum and Wildlife 3 Online Searches (25/10/07) and not Observed During the CYMAG Surveys Appendix B Full Vegetation Survey Report - Dr John Dowe (ACTFR) 4 Appendix C Terrestrial Invertebrates Report - Stephanie Seuss (Griffith 27 University) Appendix D Report on the Aquatic Invertebrate Fauna of Jack Lake - Dr Fiona 33 McKenzie-Smith (Griffith University) Appendix E Freshwater Fish Report - Dr Damien Burrows (ACTFR) 48 Appendix F Jacks Lakes Amphibian, Reptile, and Mammal Survey - Kim 51 Stephan (CYMAG) Appendix G Anabat Analysis Summary, Jack Lakes, November 2007. Prepared 58 by Greg Ford. Appendix H Avian Survey Report and Data - Drs Clifford & Dawn Frith 63 Appendix I Water Quality Analytical Results 71 These appendices accompany the Jack Lakes Wetlands Biodiversity Assessment, November 2007 & June 2008. Copies are available from: CYMAG Environmental Inc. P.O. Box 300 Cooktown, Qld, 4895 Phone: (07) 4069 5300 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cymag.com.au Cover photo: Top Lake, Jack Lakes (April 2008) 2 Jack Lakes Wetlands Biodiversity Assessment, November 2007 & June 2008 - APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Jack Lakes Vegetation and Fauna from Qld Museum and Wildlife Online Searches (25/10/07) and not Observed During the CYMAG Surveys Scientific Common Class Family Name Name Records Cormobates White-throated Aves Climacteridae leucophaeus Treecreeper Wildlife Online Trichoglossus Scaly-breasted Aves Psittacidae chlorolepidotus Lorikeet Wildlife Online Colubridae Stegonotus Slaty-grey Snake Wildlife Online Reptilia cucullatus Reptilia Scincidae Carlia dogare Four-fingered Qld Museum Skink Magnoliopsida Mimosaceae Acacia Wildlife Online leptocarpa Magnoliopsida Myrtaceae Corymbia Wildlife Online hylandii, Magnoliopsida Myrtaceae Corymbia Wildlife Online nesophila Magnoliopsida Myrtaceae Eucalyptus Wildlife Online cullenii Liliopsida Poaceae Chrysopogon sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Yampi Sound Training Area – Flora and Fauna Survey Dry Season 2008
    Yampi Sound Training Area – Flora and Fauna Survey Dry Season 2008 Regional Biodiversity Monitoring and Remediation Program (NT1651) Final Report 5 February 2009 Yampi Sound Training Area Fauna and Flora Survey Report, Dry Season 2008 Regional Biodiversity Monitoring & Remediation Program (NT1651) Final Report 5 February 2009 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 34 McLachlan Street Darwin NT 0800 Australia Tel: +61 8 8982 4800 Fax: +61 8 8982 4840 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and it’s Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Locality 2 1.2. Regional Biogeography 4 1.3. History 4 1.3.1. History of Defence Activity 4 1.4. Heritage Values 4 1.5. Desktop Review 5 1.6. Field Survey 5 1.6.1. Fauna Survey 6 1.6.2. Fauna Habitat Descriptions 10 1.6.3. Flora Monitoring 11 1.6.4. Disturbance Monitoring 11 1.7. Evaluation of Conservation Significance 11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Woinarski J. C. Z., Legge S. M., Woolley L. A., Palmer R., Dickman C
    Woinarski J. C. Z., Legge S. M., Woolley L. A., Palmer R., Dickman C. R., Augusteyn J., Doherty T. S., Edwards G., Geyle H., McGregor H., Riley J., Turpin J., Murphy B.P. (2020) Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed. Wildlife Research, Vol. 47, Iss. 8, Pp 580-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19182 1 2 3 Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species’ 4 records and estimation of numbers killed. 5 6 7 J.C.Z. Woinarskia*, S.M. Leggeb, L.A. Woolleya,k, R. Palmerc, C.R. Dickmand, J. Augusteyne, T.S. Dohertyf, 8 G. Edwardsg, H. Geylea, H. McGregorh, J. Rileyi, J. Turpinj, and B.P. Murphya 9 10 a NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, 11 Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia 12 b NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, 13 University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; AND Fenner School of the Environment and 14 Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia 15 c Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, 16 Australia 17 d NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and 18 Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 19 e Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, QLD 4701, Australia 20 f Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin 21 University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia 22 g Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, 23 Australia 24 h NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, 25 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia i School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Quinkan Country QLD 2017
    Quinkan Country, Queensland, 2017 Appendix A: Fauna species list Family Species Common name NP Alwal Bonnyglen Crocodile East Quinkan Jowalbinna Plains Kings Springvale Welcome West Quinkan Other Mammals Canidae Canis familiaris ^ Dingo (domestic dog hybrid) X* X* X* Dasyuridae Planigale maculata Common Planigale X* Macropididae Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo X* Macropididae Notamacropus agilis Agile Wallaby X* X* X* Macropididae Osphranter cf. robustus Common Wallaroo X* Muridae Mus musculus ^ House Mouse X* Muridae Rattus rattus ^ Black Rat X* Muridae Zyzomys argurus Common Rock Rat X* Phalangeridae Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum X* X* Pteropodidae Pteropus sp. X* Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus robertsi # ~ Large-eared Horseshoe Bat X* Suidae Sus scrofa ^ Pig X* X* X* Vespertilionidae Nyctophilus cf. bifax Eastern Long-eared Bat X* X* Birds Acanthizidae Gerygone palpebrosa Fairy Gerygone X* X* Acanthizidae Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill X* X* X* Accipitridae Accipiter cirrocephalus Collared Sparrowhawk X* Accipitridae Accipiter fasciatus Brown Goshawk X* X* Accipitridae Aquila audax Wedge-Tailed Eagle X* X* X* Accipitridae Haliaeetus leucogaster White-bellied Sea-Eagle X* Accipitridae Haliastur sphenurus Whistling Kite X* X* Accipitridae Hamirostra melanosternon Black-breasted Buzzard X* Accipitridae Milvus migrans Black Kite X* Alcedinidae Ceyx azureus Azure Kingfisher X* X* Alcedinidae Dacelo leachii Blue-winged Kookaburra X X* X* X* Page 1 of 35 Quinkan Country, Queensland, 2017 Appendix A: Fauna species list
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION on the TIWI ISLANDS: Plants, Vegetation Types and Terrestrial Vertebrates on Melville Island
    BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ON THE TIWI ISLANDS: plants, vegetation types and terrestrial vertebrates on Melville Island. A report to the Tiwi Land Council Report prepared by John Woinarski, Kym Brennan, Craig Hempel, Ron Firth and Felicity Watt. Darwin, November 2000 i SUMMARY This report describes the environments, terrestrial flora (1180 native species) and vertebrate fauna (334 native species) of the Tiwi Islands (based on collation of previous records and three months of field work), and issues related to their conservation. This biota includes a large component of taxa which are considered threatened (on lists attached to national or Territory legislation), and taxa which are restricted to these Islands. The number of these conservation values clearly renders the Tiwi Islands of at least national conservation significance. A digest of information on each of these threatened or endemic taxa is presented. This study was prompted by proposals for a substantial expansion of plantation forestry on these islands. Its objective was to describe the conservation values of these islands, to assess the management requirements of those values, and to propose mechanisms (including the delineation of areas which should be retained) for their maintenance. A proposed retained area network is outlined, which is devised in a stepwise manner (first identifying highly localised features, especially rainforests and riparian areas; then non­rainforest species which are known from very few localities; then more wide­ranging threatened taxa; then adding sufficient representation of the full range of environments present on the islands). The total retained area network proposed is extensive (=73% of the Islands area), but should ensure maintenance of all biodiversity conservation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Lakes Report 120309.Indd
    Jack Lakes Wetlands Biodiversity Assessment, November 2007 & June 2008 CYMAG Environmental Inc. March 2009 CYMAG Environmental CYMAG Environmental Inc. Cooktown, Queensland (CYMAG Environmental is the operational sector of CYMAG - Cape York Marine Advisory Group) Compiled by Kim Stephan and Christina Howley, December 2008 Copies are available from: CYMAG Environmental Inc. P.O. Box 300 Cooktown, Qld, 4895 Phone: (07) 4069 5300 Email: [email protected] This document and Appendices can be viewed on the CYMAG Environmental website at www.cymag.com.au Acknowledgements CYMAG Environmental wishes to thank: • Tim McGreen, Ester Henderson, Michael Ross, Kieran Ross, Adelaide Salt and Traditional Owners from the Kalpowar Land Trust for sharing their knowledge and welcoming the survey team to Jack Lakes • Queensland Parks & Wildlife for in kind support of the project, especially Russell Best, Andrew Hartwig and Keith McDonald • The scientific consultants for their experienced and insightful contributions • Michael Stephan for technical assistance • Jason Carroll for map production • Dr Murray Evans (Parks, Conservation and Land, ACT Government), Prof. Anne Magurran (School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK) and Dr Sue Briggs (NSW Dept. Environment and Climate Change c/ CSIRO) who advised on methods for assessing biodiversity Editing and design: Julie Hinchliffe (Great Sandy Publications) Cover photo: Top Lake, Jack Lakes (April 2008) Unless otherwise indicated, all photos by K. Stephan and C. Howley 2 Jack Lakes Wetlands Biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems
    University of South Florida Digital Commons @ University of South Florida USF St. Petersburg campus Faculty Publications USF Faculty Publications 2015 The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems J. Sean Doody Simon Clulow Geoff Kay Domenic D'Amore David Rhind Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/fac_publications Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Doody JS, Clulow S, Kay G, D’Amore D, Rhind D, Wilson S, et al. (2015) The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0131186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131186 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the USF Faculty Publications at Digital Commons @ University of South Florida. It has been accepted for inclusion in USF St. Petersburg campus Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University of South Florida. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESEARCH ARTICLE The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems J. Sean Doody1,2*, Simon Clulow2, Geoff Kay3, Domenic D’Amore4, David Rhind5, Steve Wilson6, Ryan Ellis7, Christina Castellano8, Colin McHenry5, Michelle Quayle5, Kim Hands9, Graeme Sawyer10, Michael Bass11 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America, 2 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University
    [Show full text]
  • The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems J
    Daemen College Daemen Digital Commons Faculty Articles Faculty Scholarship 2015-07-02 The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems J. Sean Doody Simon Clulow Geoff Kay Domenic D'Amore Daemen College, [email protected] David Rhind See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Doody, J., Clulow, S., Kay, G., D'Amore, D., Rhind, D., Wilson, S., . Bass, M. (2015). The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems. Plos One, 10(7), e0131186. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0131186 This paper is posted at Daemen Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/63 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors J. Sean Doody, Simon Clulow, Geoff Kay, Domenic D'Amore, David Rhind, Steve Wilson, Ryan Ellis, Christina Castellano, Colin McHenry, Michelle Quayle, Kim Hands, Graeme Sawyer, and Michael Bass This article is available at Daemen Digital Commons: https://digitalcommons.daemen.edu/faculty_scholar/63 RESEARCH ARTICLE The Dry Season Shuffle: Gorges Provide Refugia for Animal Communities in Tropical Savannah Ecosystems J. Sean Doody1,2*, Simon Clulow2, Geoff Kay3, Domenic D’Amore4, David Rhind5, Steve Wilson6, Ryan Ellis7, Christina Castellano8, Colin McHenry5, Michelle Quayle5, Kim Hands9, Graeme Sawyer10, Michael Bass11
    [Show full text]
  • Northwestern Naturalist
    Northwestern Naturalist VOLUME 90 NUMBER ONE SPRING 2009 A JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATON IN NORTHWESTERN NORTH AMERICA DEANNA H OLSON (coordinating editor) Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 NORTHWESTERN NATURALIST 90:61-96 AUTUMN 2009 HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATION IN NORTHWESTERN NORTH AMERICA DEANNA H OLSON (coordinating editor) Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 ABSTRACT-Conservation of the 105 species of amphibians, reptiles, and turtles in the northwestern United States and western Canada is represented by a diverse mix of projects and programs acrossten states, provinces, and territories. In this paper, 29 contributing authors review the status of herpetofauna by state, province or territory, and summarize the key issues, programs, projects, partnerships, and regulations relative to the species and habitats in those areas. Key threats to species across this expansive area include habitat degradation or loss, invasive species, disease, and climate change. Many programs and projects currently address herpetological conservation issues, including numerous small-scale monitoring and research efforts. However, management progress is hindered in many areas by a lack of herpetological expertise and basic knowledge of species' distribution patterns, limited focus within management programs, insufficient funds, and limited communication across the region. Common issues among states and provinces suggest that increased region-wide communication and coordination may aid herpetological conservation. Regional conservation collaboration has begun by the formation of the Northwest working group of Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation. Key words: amphibians, reptiles, turtles, Canada, Pacific Northwest, declines, management, PARC The conservation of amphibians, reptiles and 1983; Stebbins 1985; Storm and Leonard 1995; St.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukaladjarrandj Camp 2013 – a Report by the Djelk Rangers
    Dukaladjarrandj Camp 2013 A report by the Djelk Rangers Njaleken -The purpose of the camp Every year, the Djelk rangers would like to run a camp at Dukaladjarrandj, south from Kolorbidadah Outstation on the Cadell River in the Djelk Indigenous Protected Area, Arnhem Land. During these camps, Dukaladjarrandj is the ‘bush office’ from which Djelk does scientific and land management work including; • Looking for, tracking and trapping animals and recording plant information to build up the story of what is living in this important area. This includes recording both English and language names and scientific information. This is a big part of the work during the camp. • Managing fire and feral animals • Taking care of and learning from bim (rock art) and other important sites • Giving Traditional Owners an opportunity to join the camp and share their skills and experience Ngad-ngarri wokdi – We talked Djelk rangers have a Plan of Management which landowners were consulted over and committed to as part of the IPA. This Plan outlines the work program for the rangers. But it is still necessary to always seek permission for on country activities under that Plan. Djelk rangers and their NTG scientist Alys Stevens put much time into consulting with Traditional Owners to achieve permission for the camp. Meetings with TOs were held at the Djelk ranger shed in Maningrida and on country at Kolorbidadah. The meetings were overseen by the Senior Ranger Victor Rostron (all meetings), the Djelk Ranger Manager Brendan Bainbridge (Maningrida), with translation assistance provided by senior TO for Dukaladjarrandj Wesley Campion (all meetings), as well as the rangers themselves (all meetings).
    [Show full text]