Onshore Power Supply

—Let stay connected“ W PCI W G OPS œ 9th February 2010 Maurits Prinssen Outline

õ Feasibility studies Rdam

õ Euromax (2006)

õ Cruiseterminal (2008)

õ ROPAX (roro-ferry) (2008) õ Otherplans Rdam õ Lessons learned õ Remainingissues õ Development otherDutch ports

2 Feasibility study Eurom ax

õ New built terminal õ Different ships (owners and capacity) on same terminal õ Max power demand is 7 MW for 5,000 TEU (300 reefers connectors) õ 6,600 Volt as standard, transformation to 400 Volt on board (stacker 7.5 kV-500A, Ø 30 cm) õ Total investment costs approx. 20-30 M⁄

õ Emission reduction: 275,000 kg NOx/ year, 135,000 kg PM10/year

3 Cruiseterm inals others

õ Juneau, Alaska, USA Compulsury : 6.6 kV en 60 Hz õ Seattle, USA thuishaven van de Holland America Line heeft walstroom voor deze cruiseschepen aangelegd : 11 kV en 60 Hz õ San Francisco, USA mogelijkheden voor nieuwe cruiseterminal onderzocht : 6.6 kV en60 Hz (12.5 MW ) õ Vancouver, Canada haalbaarheidsstudie en wenselijkheid van walstroom voor cruiseschepen. Resultaten nog onbekend. õ Southam pton, UK geen concrete studies of initiatieven voor cruiseschepen. õ Ham burg, Duitsland Verkenning voor cruiseterminal, aanleiding woningbouw ontwikkelingen in het havengebied en luchtkwaliteit.

4 Feasibilitystudycruiseterm inal Rdam (costs indication shore) in k⁄

12 MVA / 6MVA double 12 MVA single 6MVA single connection connection connection Cables 340 150 240 Transformors 900 600 300 Frequentcy convertor 1,800 1,050 750 Distribution housing 480 320 320 Subtotal 3,520 2,120 1,610 unforeseen20% 704 424 322 Engineering 100 100 100 Automation 400 240 240 Building and coolinginstallations 730 438 438 assambly 150 90 90 Civil en excavation work 160 96 96 Total 5,764 3,508 2,896

flexible 27kV cable 5 ROPAX others (all 50 Hz system s)

õ Port of Kotka (Finland), õ Port of Kemi (Finland), õ Port of Oulu (Finland), õ Port of Göteborg(Sweden), õ Port of Lübeck(Germany) õ Port of (Finland) õ Port of () õ feasibility study Cruiseferry DFDS line IJmuiden-NewCastle

6 ROPAX Rdam

õ Feasibility study StenaLine Hoek van Holland and Benelux- harbour, P&OFerries Benelux-harbour õ All terminals are askedabout theirHVSCP ambition õ Investment costs shore installation(alsolessonlearned) õ Initial cost indicationshore = 2 * actual indication õ Initial cost indicationvessel ≈ actual indication õ (inlandvessels system = 75% initial cost indication) õ Prepare business case õ Commitment ferry operators, terminals and PoRA

7 Private business

PoRA

8 Future Rdam

õ Considerto prepare new quays forHVSCP infrastructure: õ ”gedempte Hartelkanaal‘ area, destinatedfor bulk/generalcargovessels õ Extensionport area (Maasvlakte 2) õ 1 standardforevery quay (undependant power required)

9 Mobile Clean HV Power System s (future)

õ LNG power plant õ Trucks õ Barges õ Fuel Cell power plant (< 1 MVA) õ Barges õ Supply vessel

10 Rem aining issues

õ Converting50 Hz Q 60 Hz: shiporterminal õ Sulphurcontent after1-1-2015 in ECA (1.5% now) and port 0.1% õ Adoptationconcept shipowners versus othergreen technologies õ Financing õ Energy orelectricity tax õ EU ETS

11 Lessons learned

õ ICL Antwerpvisit (1st 50/60 Hz installation) õ Noise reductiononboard õ Vessels stay for3 days õ Investment onboard 350 kUS$ (2005) with1 cable wheel onboard; extra wheel wouldcost 100kUS$ (2005) õ Max power demand: 1 MVA per vessel Global investm entcosts installation shore (w/o civilworkings) õ Average demand: 420 kW per vessel. M⁄ (w/o civil Num ber of work conncet õ Lease constructionare alsopossible MVA ) ions õ Central conversionis possible, transformationto 1 1.0 1 board electriccurrent per connection(vessel) 2 1.6 1 3 2.4 1 õ The time neededto connect: 45 minuten. 4 3.2 2 5 4.0 2 6 4.8 2 7 5.6 3 8 6.4 3 12 9 7.2 3 PoRA cooperation

õ NL seaports forinlandOPS õ NL seaports õ Discussions withsuppliers HV SCP õ Discussionwithshipowners õ [W PCI ()]

13 Em ission reduction potential SCP MSC Alessia Maas center boei

NOx (Kg p port call- >)

Am azonehaven W aalhaven NOx PM10 PM 10 From W aterweg to Port 140 15 573 60 Manoeuvering 155 18 246 28 Along berth 730/71% 34/51% 730/47% 34/28%

Total 1025 66 1549 121 14