DOCSLIB.ORG

The Purpose of This Biodiversity Assessment Report Is to Detail the Ecosystem and Species Credits for the Project As Generated by the Biobank Calculator

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Purpose of This Biodiversity Assessment Report Is to Detail the Ecosystem and Species Credits for the Project As Generated by the Biobank Calculator Biodiversity Assessment Report: Proposal ID: 0099/2015/1951 114 Flatrock Rd Mundamia – proposed Resource Recovery Park The purpose of this Biodiversity Assessment Report is to detail the Ecosystem and Species Credits for the project as generated by the Biobank Calculator Environmental Planning and Assessment Unit, Environmental Services Section, Shoalhaven City Council 2015 Biodiversity Assessment Report: Resource Recovery Park Flatrock Rd Mundamia Major Project: Project ID: 0099/2015/1951114 Executive Summary Shoalhaven City Council’s Environmental Assessment Unit has completed a Biodiversity Impact Assessment of the proposed Resource Recovery Park Major Project (State Significant Development – reference SDD 15_7015), to be sited on 114 Flatrock Road Mundamia. The site is currently occupied by an operating Animal Shelter. The Secretary of the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DP&E) Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) required the assessment to be undertaken using the Framework for Biodiversity Assessment Methodology (FBAM) by an accredited Biobank Assessor (Accredited Biobank Assessor number 0099) The proposal was assessed using the FBAM methodology based on the entire site of 3.58ha being cleared and utilised. The site contained 2.35ha of native vegetation in addition to the existing Animal Shelter infrastructure and associated cleared areas. Vegetation surveys within the area of native vegetation identified one Plant Community Type (SR594; Bloodwood – Hard-leaved Scribbly Gum – Silvertop Ash heathy open forest on sandstone plateaux of the lower Shoalhaven Valley, Sydney Basin Bioregion). The Biobank Assessment calculated the total loss of this vegetation would require the retirement of 133 ecosystem credits. Targeted surveys (conducted under Scientific Licence SL100128 and Animal Research Authority TRIM13/3758) were also conducted for threatened species identified in the SEARs and the Biobank Assessment process. Habitat for one “species credit” threatened fauna species; Squirrel Glider (assumed to be present), was identified with the loss of 2.35ha of its habitat requiring the retirement of 52 Squirrel Glider species credits. Four other “ecosystem” threatened fauna species were also detected with mitigation measures recommended to mitigate and confine impacts to the subject site. Shoalhaven City Council is currently investigating and discussing offset options on a parcel of Council owned land at Huskisson, approximately 22km to the south east, with the NSW Office of Environment & Heritage. The Huskisson site is 72.36ha with approximately 55ha available for an offset worth 732 ecosystem credits (preliminary calculation). Finding Squirrel Glider credits are also the subject of negotiations. Full details of the assessment process as per the FBA methodology are in sections 3 to 11 of this report with the Biobank credit report from the Biobank calculator provided in Appendix 2. 2 Biodiversity Assessment Report: Resource Recovery Park Flatrock Rd Mundamia Major Project: Project ID: 0099/2015/1951114 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 PROPOSED MAJOR PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SITE JUSTIFICATION 1 LANDSCAPE FEATURES 3 3.1 IBRA bioregion and subregions, NSW landscape region and area (ha) 3 3.2 Native vegetation extent in the outer assessment circle 4 3.3 Cleared areas 4 3.4 Rivers and streams classified according to stream order 5 3.5 Wetlands within, adjacent to and downstream of the site 5 3.6 Landscape value components: 7 3.6.1 Percent native vegetation cover in the landscape (development site) 7 3.6.2 Connectivity value (development site) 7 3.6.3 Patch size (development site) 8 3.6.4 Area to perimeter ration (development site), and 8 3.6.5 Strategic location of a biobank site 8 3.6.6 Landscape value score 9 NATIVE VEGETATION 10 4.1 Plant communities identified within the development site 10 4.2 Description of vegetation zones within the development site 13 4.3 Local Data 14 CREDIT REPORT AND DATA SHEETS 14 THREATENED SPECIES REQUIRING SURVEY 15 PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 15 THREATENED FLORA SPECIES, SURVEY METHODS AND RESULTS 17 THREATENED FAUNA SPECIES, SURVEY METHODS 36 RESULTS: TARGETED THREATENED FAUNA SPECIES 44 1 Biodiversity Assessment Report: Resource Recovery Park Flatrock Rd Mundamia Major Project: Project ID: 0099/2015/1951114 DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 59 BIODIVERSITY CREDITS REQUIRED AND “OFFSET STRATEGY” 62 REFERENCES 64 APPENDIX 1 MAP OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT 65 APPENDIX 2 BIODIVERSITY CREDIT REPORT 66 APPENDIX 3 EXPERT ORCHID ASSESSMENT REPORT 69 APPENDIX 4 FAUNA DETECTED DURING TARGETED SURVEYS 70 APPENDIX 5 WEATHER DATA DURING FAUNA SURVEY PERIOD 74 APPENDIX 6 SEARS 78 Table 1: Survey time matrix Species Credit species requiring survey ............................................ 16 Table 2: Survey techniques effort and dates ............................................................................... 42 Table 3: Anabat Survey dates ..................................................................................................... 53 Table 4: Confirmed Bat Calls 19.2.15 West Nowra Animal Shelter ................................................ 54 Table 5: Confirmed Bat Calls 33 from 27.4.15 .............................................................................. 54 Table 6: W Nowra Animal Shelter 16.3.15 confirmed calls ........................................................... 55 Table 7: Fauna detected during targeted surveys ........................................................................ 70 Table 8: Nowra Daily Summaries February–May 2015 ................................................................. 74 Figure 1: Aerial photograph of the subject site 114 Flatrock Rd Mundamia (Lot 342 DP 257515) ..... 2 Figure 2: The subject site and surrounding landscape .................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Subject site position within Mitchell Landscape .............................................................. 4 Figure 4: Area of native vegetation within the 1000ha Assessment Circle ...................................... 5 Figure 5: Waterways and vegetation cover within the 1000ha Assessment Circle ........................... 6 Figure 6: Area of native vegetation within the 100ha Assessment circle......................................... 7 Figure 7: Regional Biodiversity Habitat Corridor (Shoalhaven LEP 2014) ......................................... 9 Figure 8: Vegetation Plots (20mx50m) locations within the RRP site ............................................ 11 Figure 9: Biometric mapping 2013 .............................................................................................. 12 Figure 10: Targeted flora survey transects and results 15 September 2015 .................................. 17 2 Biodiversity Assessment Report: Resource Recovery Park Flatrock Rd Mundamia Major Project: Project ID: 0099/2015/1951114 Figure 11: Genoplesium baueri survey area 24 February 2015 ..................................................... 24 Figure 12: Cryptostylis hunteriana survey area 12 December 2014............................................... 28 Figure 13: Fauna survey locations and techniques ....................................................................... 39 Figure 14: Spotlight transects and dates ..................................................................................... 41 Figure 15 EEP and Squirrel Glider records from 2014 ................................................................... 46 Figure 16: Hollow-bearing and glider feed tree locations identified on the subject land ............... 50 Figure 17: Biobanking Final Credit Report, Page 1 ....................................................................... 66 Figure 18:Biobanking Final Credit Report, Page 2 ........................................................................ 67 Figure 19: Biobanking Final Credit Report, Page 3 ....................................................................... 68 3 Biodiversity Assessment Report: Resource Recovery Park Flatrock Rd Mundamia Major Project: Project ID: 0099/2015/1951114 Introduction Shoalhaven City Council proposes to develop a Resource Recovery Park (RRP - Recycling Facility) which has been identified as a Major Project (State Significant Development – reference SDD 15_7015) under the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). An application for a Major Project must be accompanied by an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Shoalhaven City Council has received the Secretary of the Department of Planning and Environment (DP&E) Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) (Reference SSD 15 _7015). This Biodiversity Assessment Report (BAR) has been prepared to meet the requirements of the SEARs and “Appendix 7: Reporting requirements for the FBA”, of the Framework for Biodiversity Assessment (FBA), NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects (OEH, 2014a). The assessment and Biodiversity Assessment Report has been produced by an accredited Biobanking Assessor. Assessor Name: Michael Smith Assessor Number: 0099 Calculator Version: Biobanking Credit Calculator Version 2.0 Proposed Major Project Description and site justification This BAR is for a Biobanking Statement for a proposed Major Project development being a Resource Recovery Park (RRP) to be operated by Shoalhaven City Council at 114 Flatrock Road Mundamia (Lot 342 DP 257515), approximately 5km west of Nowra on the South Coast of NSW. A map of the final project footprint
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eucalyptus Study Group Article
    Association of Societies for Growing Australian Plants Eucalyptus Study Group ISSN 1035-4603 Eucalyptus Study Group Newsletter December 2012 No. 57 Study Group Leader Warwick Varley Eucalypt Study Group Website PO Box 456, WOLLONGONG, NSW 2520 http://asgap.org.au/EucSG/index.html Email: [email protected] Membership officer Sue Guymer 13 Conos Court, DONVALE, VICTORIA 3111 Email: [email protected] Contents Do Australia's giant fire-dependent trees belong in the rainforest? By EurekAlert! Giant Eucalypts sent back to the rainforest By Rachel Sullivan Abstract: Dual mycorrhizal associations of jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) in a nurse-pot system The Eucalypt's survival secret By Danny Kingsley Plant Profile; Corymbia gummifera By Tony Popovich Eucalyptus ×trabutii By Warwick Varley SUBSCRIPTION TIME Do Australia's giant fire-dependent trees belong in the rainforest? By EurekAlert! Australia's giant eucalyptus trees are the tallest flowering plants on earth, yet their unique relationship with fire makes them a puzzle for ecologists. Now the first global assessment of these giants, published in New Phytologist, seeks to end a century of debate over the species' classification and may change the way it is managed in future. Gigantic trees are rare. Of the 100,000 global tree species only 50, less than 0.005 per cent, reach over 70 metres in height. While many of the giants live in Pacific North America, Borneo and similar habitats, 13 are eucalypts endemic to Southern and Eastern Australia. The tallest flowering plant in Australia is Eucalyptus regnans, with temperate eastern Victoria and Tasmania being home to the six tallest recorded species of the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production OCTOBER 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production by Jonathan Lidbetter October 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000509 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-328-4 ISSN 1440-6845 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production Publication No. 11/149 Project No. PRJ-000509 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for Triplarina Nowraensis, Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, (NSW)
    NATIONAL RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE NOWRA HEATH MYRTLE Triplarina nowraensis © Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), 2011. This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW). Prepared by: Biodiversity Conservation Section Environment Protection and Regulation Group Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) PO Box 2115 Queanbeyan NSW 2620 Tel: 02 6298 9700 Prepared in accordance with the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 in consultation with Environment ACT. This plan should be cited as follows: Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) 2011, National Recovery Plan for Triplarina nowraensis, Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, (NSW). ISBN: 978 1 74232 842 3 OEH 2010/571 Cover Photo: © Geoff Robertson DISCLAIMER The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, and may also be constrained by the need to address other conservation priorities. Approved recovery actions may be subject to modifications due to changes in knowledge and changes in conservation status. Summary This document constitutes the formal National and New South Wales State Recovery Plan for the Nowra Heath-myrtle (Triplarina nowraensis). It considers the conservation requirements of the species across its known range, identifies the future actions to be taken to ensure the long-term viability of the Nowra Heath-myrtle in nature and the parties who will carry these out.
    [Show full text]
  • Triplarina Nowraensis)
    Draft NSW & National Recovery Plan Recovery Plan for the Nowra Heath-myrtle (Triplarina nowraensis) NSW NATIONAL Draft for Public Comment PARKS AND WILDLIFE March 2003 SERVICE © NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, 2002. This work is copyright however, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from NPWS. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 95856444 www.npws.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding this recovery program are best directed to the Recovery Team via: The Nowra Heath Myrtle Recovery Team coordinator Threatened Species Unit, NPWS Southern Directorate PO Box 2115 Queanbeyan NSW 2620 Ph: (02) 6298 9700 email <[email protected]> Or The Director, Regional Wildlife Programs, Wildlife Australia Branch, Environment Australia, PO Box 636, Canberra ACT 2601 Ph: (02) 6274 1111 Cover illustration: Flowering branchlet of the Nowra Heath Myrtle Triplarina nowraensis. This plan should be cited as: NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2000) Draft NSW and National Recovery Plan for the Nowra Heath-myrtle (Triplarina nowraensis) NSW National Park and Wildlife Service, Hurstville NSW. ISBN: 0 7313 6192 X Draft Recovery Plan Nowra Heath-myrtle Recovery Plan for the Nowra Heath-myrtle (Triplarina nowraensis) Executive Summary This document constitutes the formal draft Commonwealth and New South Wales State Recovery Plan for the Nowra Heath-myrtle Triplarina nowraensis.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Origin of the Orchidaceae from a Fossil Orchid with Its Pollinator
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6111228 Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Article in Nature · September 2007 DOI: 10.1038/nature06039 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 211 770 5 authors, including: Santiago R Ramírez Barbara Gravendeel University of California, Davis Leiden University, Naturalis Biodiversity Center & University of Applied Sciences L… 50 PUBLICATIONS 999 CITATIONS 208 PUBLICATIONS 2,081 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Rodrigo B. Singer Naomi E Pierce Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Harvard University 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,381 CITATIONS 555 PUBLICATIONS 6,496 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Insect endosymbiont diversity View project Support threatened research Institutions from Southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Barbara Gravendeel on 31 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Vol 448 | 30 August 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature06039 LETTERS Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Santiago R. Ramı´rez1, Barbara Gravendeel2, Rodrigo B. Singer3, Charles R. Marshall1,4 & Naomi E. Pierce1 Since the time of Darwin1, evolutionary biologists have been fas- subfamily showed that the size, shape and ornamentation of the cinated by the spectacular adaptations to insect pollination exhib- fossil closely resemble those of modern members of the subtribe ited by orchids. However, despite being the most diverse plant Goodyerinae, particularly the genera Kreodanthus and Microchilus family on Earth2, the Orchidaceae lack a definitive fossil record (Supplementary Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Plinia Trunciflora
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 40, 4, 871-876 (2017) Copyright © 2017, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. Printed in Brazil DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0096 Genome Insight Complete sequence and comparative analysis of the chloroplast genome of Plinia trunciflora Maria Eguiluz1, Priscila Mary Yuyama2, Frank Guzman2, Nureyev Ferreira Rodrigues1 and Rogerio Margis1,2 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2Departamento de Biofísica, Centro de Biotecnologia, Laboratório de Genomas e Populações de Plantas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Abstract Plinia trunciflora is a Brazilian native fruit tree from the Myrtaceae family, also known as jaboticaba. This species has great potential by its fruit production. Due to the high content of essential oils in their leaves and of anthocyanins in the fruits, there is also an increasing interest by the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, there are few studies fo- cusing on its molecular biology and genetic characterization. We herein report the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of P. trunciflora using high-throughput sequencing and compare it to other previously sequenced Myrtaceae genomes. The cp genome of P. trunciflora is 159,512 bp in size, comprising inverted repeats of 26,414 bp and sin- gle-copy regions of 88,097 bp (LSC) and 18,587 bp (SSC). The genome contains 111 single-copy genes (77 pro- tein-coding, 30 tRNA and four rRNA genes). Phylogenetic analysis using 57 cp protein-coding genes demonstrated that P. trunciflora, Eugenia uniflora and Acca sellowiana form a cluster with closer relationship to Syzygium cumini than with Eucalyptus.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Koala Nursery
    Friends of the Koala Nursery Rifle Range Road, East Lismore NSW 2480 (PO BOX 5034, East Lismore NSW 2480) * OPEN BY APPOINTMENT * Contact: Mark Wilson, Nursery Manager 0413 339 554 Email: [email protected] PLANT LIST – JUNE 2021 1. EUCALYPTS: (a) Koala food - price $1.00 (Commercial price $2.00) E. microcorys TALLOWOOD E. grandis FLOODED GUM E. robusta SWAMP MAHOGANY E. tereticornis FOREST RED GUM E. resinifera RED MAHOGANY E. siderophloia GREY IRONBARK E. saligna SYDNEY BLUE GUM E. propinqua GREY GUM E. acmenoides WHITE MAHOGANY E. dunni DUNN’S WHITE GUM E. amplifolia CABBAGE GUM E. racemosa SCRIBBLY GUM E. pilularis BLACKBUTT (b) Non-Koala food - prices as marked 2.00 Corymbia citriodora LEMON-SCENTED GUM 30m, lemon-scented foliage 2.00 Corymbia gummifera RED BLOODWOOD 30m large white flowers, good timber tree 1.50 Corymbia intermedia PINK BLOODWOOD 30m large white flowers, good timber tree 2.00 Corymbia maculata SPOTTED GUM 30m, good timber tree 2.00 Eucalyptus moluccana GREY BOX 25m mottled bark, good honey tree 2. SHRUBS: Order Price Variety Description 1.50 Acacia suaveolens SWEET-SCENTED WATTLE 1-2m, pale yellow sweetly scented flowers 3.00 Acmena ‘Allyn Magic’ DWARF LILLY-PILLY 50cm, burgundy new growth all year, 3.00 Acmena ‘Forest Flame’ 2-3m, lovely red new foliage, psyllid-free, great screen plant 3.00 Acmena smithii ‘Minipilly’ DWARF LILLY-PILLY 2m, red tips, great hedge or container plant 3.00 Astartea fascicularis ‘Pink’ 1m, pink flowers from Autumn to Summer 3.00 Austromyrtus ‘Copper Tops’ 1.2m, spreading shrub
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Leaf Traits, Insect Communities and Resource Availability
    Relationship between Leaf Traits, Insect Communities and Resource Availability Emma Laxton BSc (Hons), BA (Hons), MIntS Department of Biological Sciences Division of Environment and Life Sciences Macquarie University North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2005 The work described in this thesis is original and has not been submitted in any form for a higher degree at any other university or institution. All of the work presented in this thesis is my own and was undertaken during my PhD candidature: February 2002 to November 2005. November 2005 Emma Laxton 2 Abstract This project used the resource availability hypothesis (Coley et al., 1985) as a framework for investigating the relationship between resource availability (as defined by soil nutrients), leaf traits, insect herbivore damage and insect community structure. According to the hypothesis, plants from low resource environments should be better-defended, have longer leaf lifespans and slower growth rates than plants from higher resource environments. Higher resource plant species are expected to suffer higher levels of herbivory and recover faster from herbivory than low resource plant species (Coley et al. 1985). A corollary to this hypothesis is that plants from higher resource sites should support greater densities of insect herbivores than low resource species. The study was performed in Sydney, Australia, providing a temperate, southern hemisphere complement to most previous studies on herbivory conducted in the tropics and the northern hemisphere. The project had five components. Comparisons between high and low resource sites were made in terms of: (i) leaf traits of mature and immature leaves; (ii) phenology of leaf maturation; (iii) herbivore damage in the field and laboratory; (iv) diversity and abundance of herbivorous insect fauna; and (v) ability to recover from herbivory.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    10.1071/BT11174_AC Australian Journal of Botany 60(3), 165–199. CSIRO 2012 Supplementary Material Pollen morphology of the Myrtaceae. Part 1: tribes Eucalypteae, Lophostemoneae, Syncarpieae, Xanthostemoneae and subfamily Psiloxyloideae Andrew H. Thornhill, Geoff S. Hope, Lyn A. Craven and Michael D. Crisp Supplementary Table S1. List of taxa viewed with SEM ANBG - Australian Botanic Gardens, BRI - Queensland Herbarium, CANB, CBG - Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO, Canberra, DNA - Northern Territory Herbarium L - National Herbarium Nederland (Leiden), MI - University of Michigan Herbarium, NSW - National Herbarium of New South Wales, P - Herbier National de Paris. Taxon Voucher details Allosyncarpia ternata S.T.Blake C.R. Dunlop 4626, DNA Angophora costata Britten D. Nicolle 2103, CANB Angophora floribunda (Sm.) Sweet A. Gunnell 18 & W. Bishop, CANB Angophora hispida (Sm.) Blaxell Brooker 12948, CANB Angophora melanoxylon R.T.Baker leg. ign. 841, CANB Arillastrum gummiferum (Brongn. & Gris) Pancher ex Baill. G. McPherson 3580, CANB Corymbia maculata (Hook.) K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson C.R. Dunlop s.n., CANB Corymbia variegata (F. Muell.) K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson M.I.H. Brooker 3360, CANB (Accepted Corymbia citriodora (Hook.) K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson) Eucalyptopsis papuana C.T.White M. Jacobs 9032, CANB Eucalyptus barklyensis L.A.S.Johnson & K.D.Hill K. Hill 3560 & L. Stanberg, DNA Eucalyptus cosmophylla F. Muell. M. Banks 1099, CANB Eucalyptus curtisii Blakely & C.T.White L.H. Bird s.n., NSW Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus Labill. T.A. Halliday 609, CANB Eucalyptus gunnii Hook.f. A. Moscal 14907, CANB Eucalyptus haemastoma Sm. R. Coveny 11354 & M.
    [Show full text]
  • D.Nicolle, Classification of the Eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2
    Taxonomy Genus (common name, if any) Subgenus (common name, if any) Section (common name, if any) Series (common name, if any) Subseries (common name, if any) Species (common name, if any) Subspecies (common name, if any) ? = Dubious or poorly-understood taxon requiring further investigation [ ] = Hybrid or intergrade taxon (only recently-described and well-known hybrid names are listed) ms = Unpublished manuscript name Natural distribution (states listed in order from most to least common) WA Western Australia NT Northern Territory SA South Australia Qld Queensland NSW New South Wales Vic Victoria Tas Tasmania PNG Papua New Guinea (including New Britain) Indo Indonesia TL Timor-Leste Phil Philippines ? = Dubious or unverified records Research O Observed in the wild by D.Nicolle. C Herbarium specimens Collected in wild by D.Nicolle. G(#) Growing at Currency Creek Arboretum (number of different populations grown). G(#)m Reproductively mature at Currency Creek Arboretum. – (#) Has been grown at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. – (#)m At least one population has been grown to maturity at CCA, but the taxon is no longer alive. Synonyms (commonly-known and recently-named synonyms only) Taxon name ? = Indicates possible synonym/dubious taxon D.Nicolle, Classification of the eucalypts (Angophora, Corymbia and Eucalyptus) | 2 Angophora (apples) E. subg. Angophora ser. ‘Costatitae’ ms (smooth-barked apples) A. subser. Costatitae, E. ser. Costatitae Angophora costata subsp. euryphylla (Wollemi apple) NSW O C G(2)m A. euryphylla, E. euryphylla subsp. costata (smooth-barked apple, rusty gum) NSW,Qld O C G(2)m E. apocynifolia Angophora leiocarpa (smooth-barked apple) Qld,NSW O C G(1) A.
    [Show full text]