The Truth About Online Consumers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Truth About Online Consumers The truth about online consumers 2017 Global Online Consumer Report kpmg.com/onlineconsumers Foreword Enabled by technology, the continued year over year growth in online shopping has been fueled by a new generation of consumers who want greater convenience, In this report value and options. For consumer businesses, this trend poses both challenges and significant opportunities. How do companies target Competition is no longer limited to local shops during business hours. Consumers Millennials who no longer today are shopping all the time and everywhere; and in a truly global online trust traditional advertising? marketplace, products can easily be purchased from retailers and manufacturers How important are payment located anywhere in the world—or from those with no physical retail locations at all. options in India? Which Consumer demand for richer experiences and greater convenience means that countries are most likely to retailers need to rethink their strategy, both online and in stores. Having the right buy from foreign websites? product mix is no longer sufficient to attract the new wave of consumers including Where are consumers Millennials, who are entirely focused on one transaction—theirs. Creating an online willing to buy groceries shopping experience enhanced by technology such as augmented and virtual reality online? In this report we or 3D is becoming at least as important as providing convenient and personalized ordering, payment and delivery options. answer these and other questions that can help However, despite the rise of online shopping, ecommerce still makes up a relatively inform an online strategy small percentage of total retail spending. Retailers’ brick and mortar strategies also need to evolve to continue to draw customers into their stores, and to compete that is more targeted, with the online retailers opening their own physical outlets. Increasingly, we are effective and customer- seeing innovative marketing strategies, as well as new technologies such as smart centric. shelves, robots, self-checkout, and interactive and virtual reality, being deployed in stores as retailers strive to compete on all fronts. Finding the ‘right’ strategy starts with one question: Given your brand promise, where do you want to compete? Only once a company understands their goals, customers and those customers’ needs can an appropriate strategy be designed. And the key to a sustainable strategy is being able to understand and meet customer needs both today and tomorrow, across geographies, and across generations. In this report, we aim to raise and answer some questions about your company’s approach to ecommerce. Our global research on online consumer behaviors, preferences and attitudes can be leveraged by consumer companies seeking to improve their approach towards winning and retaining customers online. I hope you find this report interesting and insightful. I would like to thank the survey respondents, company executives, and KPMG professionals who invested their time and insights to make this study possible. To learn more about this research, please visit kpmg.com/onlineconsumers or contact a member of KPMG directly. Sincerely, Willy Kruh Global Chair, Consumer Markets KPMG International ©2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Contents What do consumers really want? ......................................................2 The dilemma .....................................................................................2 What 18,430 consumers told us .......................................................3 Online purchase behavior ...................................................................4 Online shopping as a rising trend ......................................................4 Product category trends....................................................................6 Rise of international trade and e-tailers.............................................8 Device preference trends ................................................................12 The path to purchase journey ...........................................................14 Stage 1 — Awareness: triggers and influencers .............................15 Stage 2 — Consideration: product and company research .............16 Stage 3 — Conversion: deciding where and when to buy ..............20 Stage 4 — Evaluation: experience and feedback ............................22 Cycle duration .................................................................................24 Understanding consumer attitudes and motivations ....................27 What’s driving the shift to online? ...................................................27 Overcoming the hurdles to selling online........................................28 Winning the online consumer .........................................................29 Payment options need to be regionally tailored ..............................30 Building consumer trust ..................................................................33 Are experience and trust enough to earn consumer loyalty? ..........34 How KPMG can help .........................................................................35 About KPMG ......................................................................................36 Contact us ......................................................................................Back 2017 Global Online Consumer Report 1 ©2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. What do consumers really want? Advances in technology, logistics, payments and trust — coupled with increasing internet and mobile access and consumer demand for convenience — have created a US$1.9 trillion global online shopping arena, where millions of consumers no longer ‘go’ shopping, but literally ‘are’ shopping — at every moment and everywhere. A recent report by KPMG International The dilemma titled ‘Seeking customer centricity The burning question is, how can 1 through omni business models’ , looked consumer and retail companies achieve at how consumer and retail businesses this nirvana of consumer mindreading? are transforming to adapt to the shift How can they identify and keep pace from traditional shop-centric business with the behaviors and preferences of models to a new world where the customers today and tomorrow? How customer is increasingly at the center can they ensure their online strategy of a perpetual shopping experience. In is acutely tailored to attract and win this ‘customer-centric’ reality, retailers the diverse and dynamic customer need to be exceptionally sensitive segments they serve? and responsive to when and where their potential customers are making purchase decisions (both consciously and subconsciously) throughout their ‘always on’ shopping journey. 1 https://www.kpmg.com/cmsurvey 2 2017 Global Online Consumer Report ©2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Baby Boomers Generation X Millennials Born 1946-1965 Born 1966-1981 Born 1982-2001 What 18,430 consumers told us The ultimate purpose of this research ways to filter and classify the data is During 2016, KPMG conducted an was to provide consumer goods and too copious to summarize in a single international study on consumer retail companies with the global and report, so in the following sections behaviors and preferences related to local insights into the specific behaviors we provide an overview of the global online shopping. The research was and preferences of the customers results, highlighting the most significant largely based on an online survey of they want to target. By understanding or interesting trends and comparisons 18,430 consumers living in more than the uniqueness of different customer among the major demographic groups 50 countries. The respondents were segments, companies can tailor their and product categories. online strategies for maximum success. between the ages of 15 and 70, each Executives interested in receiving more having purchased at least one consumer The depth of the data collected for this detailed insights are invited to contact product online in the past 12 months. study makes it possible for companies KPMG to have a member of our team In addition to scrutinizing their online to analyze and forecast the behaviors filter and analyze the full set of data shopping behaviors, preferences, and and preferences of their customers according to your specific requirements decision processes, the study also by geography, generation (Millennials, or target markets. explored consumers’ plans for future Generation X or Baby Boomers) and/ online purchases, factors affecting trust or product category. The number of and loyalty towards certain brands, and their sentiments and attitudes towards the companies that they do, or don’t, choose to buy from. 2017 Global Online Consumer Report 3 ©2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Online purchase behavior Survey respondents were The digital age and
Recommended publications
  • Price Comparison, Price Competition, and the Effects of Shopbots Kirsten A
    Journal of Business & Economics Research – September 2013 Volume 11, Number 9 Price Comparison, Price Competition, And The Effects Of ShopBots Kirsten A. Passyn, Salisbury University, USA Memo Diriker, Salisbury University, USA Robert B. Settle, Salisbury University, USA ABSTRACT Two ShopBots were used to determine high-to-low price dispersion for identical models of 25 consumer durables, in 2007 and again in 2011, revealing substantial but declining price dispersion ratios. A survey of 1,135 American online shoppers revealed their dependence on ShopBots and frequency of other online shopping actions. Typical respondent reported they "very often" used search sites to locate what they wanted. Nearly 30 percent used the most often named price comparison site, Yahoo! Shopping, in the past year, suggesting substantial potential for future price rationalization. Several customer relationship management tools online merchants might use to avoid the resulting direct price competition are discussed. Finally, the impact of m- commerce, tablets, and apps on online price comparison behavior is explored. Keywords: Consumer Behavior; Database Marketing; Direct Marketing; Electronic Commerce; Online Shopping; Price Dispersion INTRODUCTION s annual online shopping in North America reaches the $200 Billion mark (Lumry, 2011), the emergence of ShopBots such as Yahoo! Shopping and Google Product Search has facilitated consumers’ ability to gather price and product information, virtually mitigating search costs. It was Atherefore initially assumed that as ShopBots became increasingly prevalent on-line merchants would come under increased price competition, eventually leading to price convergence. With ShopBots now the third most popular online shopping option after eBay and Amazon, we reassess the impact of ShopBots on price as they reach their tipping point.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer
    McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer McKinsey Insights China McKinsey Consumer & Shopper Insights March 2012 Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer Yuval Atsmon Max Magni Lihua Li Wenkan Liao The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of their colleagues: Molly Liu, Cherie Zhang, Barry Liu, Rachel Zheng, Justin Peng, William Cheng, Glenn Leibowitz, Joanne Mason. 5 Contents Introduction 6 1. China at a turning point 8 2. Getting the basics right: changing demographics 12 Mainstream consumers driving income growth 13 Aging population 17 Postponed life stages 18 Increasingly independent women 18 3. Understanding the mainstream consumer: new spending patterns 20 Growing discretionary spending 21 Aspirations-driven trading up 22 Emerging senior market 23 Evolving geographic differences 24 4. Understanding the mainstream consumer: behavioral patterns 26 The still-pragmatic consumer 27 The individual consumer 27 The increasingly loyal consumer 28 The modern shopper 29 5. Preparing for the 2020 consumer: implications for companies 34 Strategic imperatives 35 Growth enablers 37 Conclusion 37 Introduction Meet the 2020 Chinese consumer 7 Most large, consumer-facing companies have long realized that they will need China’s growth to power their own in the next decade. But to keep pace, they will also need to understand the economic, societal, and demographic changes that are shaping consumers’ profiles and the way they spend. This is no easy task, not only because of the fast pace of growth and subsequent changes being wrought on the Chinese way of life, but also because there are vast economic and demographic differences across China. These are set to become more marked, with significant implications for companies that fail to grasp them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Convenience in Technology Acceptance
    TAM and Place: The Role of Convenience in Technology Acceptance J. Paul Leavell, [email protected] ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between perceived convenience and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Data were collected from a financial institution in the western United States. The context of the study was the intention of this institution’s customers to use an interactive teller machine (ITM). ITMs are automated machines that are replacing tellers in some bank branches allowing customers to engage in transactions such as loan payments, cash deposits and withdrawals, cashing checks, and funds transfers. ITMs differ from automatic teller machines (ATM) in that they allow for assisted interactions by branch and/or remote staff. ATMs are generally not deployed with the expectation of assisted self-service transactions. Conceptual Framework The technology acceptance model (TAM) has been used to study how individuals come to accept and use technology. The model was an extension of Fishbein’s and Ajzen’s (1975) theory of reasoned action (TRA) which posited that intention for a given behavior was a consequence of an individual’s attitude and subjective norms. Davis (1989) decomposed the attitude construct into perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Since Davis, the model has been used in a myriad of contexts: for example, online shopping (Ashraf, Thongpapanl, & Auh, 2014; Panchamia & Doctor, 2015; Lu & Rastrick, 2014), self-service banking (Kansal, 2016), adoption of app-based cab services (Roy, 2016), online education (Landry, griffeth, & Hartman, 2006; Cheng , 2011), medical technology (Seeman & Gibson, 2009), and customer management (Šebjan, Bobek, & Tominc, 2017). Various models have been proposed to extend the TAM with additional variables: for example, self-efficacy (Joo, Park, & Lim, 2018), motivational variables (Siegel, Acharya, & Sivo, 2017), variables from the diffusion of innovation theory (Lee, Hsieh, & Hsu, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded At
    THE BROWN MOMENT IN TAIWAN: MAKING SENSE OF THE LAW AND POLITICS OF THE TAIWANESE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE IN A COMPARATIVE LIGHT Ming-Sung Kuo & Hui-Wen Chen+ The Taiwan Constitutional Court (TCC) recently issued a landmark decision in Interpretation No. 748 (the Same-Sex Marriage Case), declaring the definition of marriage as a gender-differentiated union of a man and a woman under the Civil Code unconstitutional and setting the stage for Taiwan to become the first in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage. This decision has been compared to Obergefell v. Hodges. However, reading Obergefell in the broad context of the gay rights movement and the role of judicial review in Taiwanese constitutional politics, we challenge this analogy. Due to the discrepancy between the social movement and the law in the fight for constitutional rights for gays and lesbians in Taiwan, the Same-Sex Marriage Case is Taiwan’s Brown v. Board of Education moment in her constitutional law and politics. To make sense of the law and politics of the Same Sex Marriage Case, we evaluate its political context and the text and style in its reasoning. We observe a discrepancy between law and politics in the pursuit of the constitutional rights of gays and lesbians in Taiwan. The rise of same-sex marriage to the top of the antidiscrimination agenda resulted from the continuous effort of gay rights activists, while the TCC watched this movement from the sidelines until the Same-Sex Marriage Case. This case thus mirrors Brown in two respects. First, the role of the TCC has been publicly questioned after its Brown-like contentious decision on the issue of same-sex marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Commerce in the Gaming Industry. Legal Chal- Lenges And
    Pécs Journal of International and European Law - 2019/I-II. Electronic Commerce in the Gaming Industry. Legal Chal- lenges and European Perspective on Contracts through Elec- tronic Means in Video Games and Decentralized Applications Olena Demchenko PhD student, University of Pécs, Faculty of Law The present paper explains the need in the application of electronic commerce regulations to the so-called in-game purchasing activity in video games, particularly, purchase of intangible items, where such game is commoditized, focusing on the legislation of the European Union. It examines in detail the various applications of European regulations to the issues connected to the gaming industry in the European Union - gambling regulations, geo-blocking, data protection, smart con- tracts validity and enforcement, virtual currencies regulation in the scope of contractual law, and shows a possible way to adapt the national legislation of the Member States and European legis- lation in order to secure electronic commerce in the gaming industry. The present paper analyses gaps in existing legal procedures, stresses the necessity of new legal models in order to regulate the purchase of intangible items in video games and decentralized applications and underlines the importance of amendments to current European legislation with particular focus on new devel- opments of Create, Retrieve, Append, Burn technology and commoditized video games in order to protect consumer rights and the free movement of digital goods and to accomplish the Digital Single Market Strategy of the European Union. Keywords: video games, Blockchain, smart contract, electronic commerce, decentralized applica- tions 1. Introduction Since 1961, when MIT student Steven Russel created the first-ever video game “Spacewar”, which inspired the creation of such popular video games as “Asteroids” and “Pong”,1 technology went much further.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacrificing Privacy for Convenience: the Need for Stricter FTC Regulations in an Age of Smartphone Surveillance
    Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 34 Issue 2 Article 6 12-15-2014 Sacrificing Privacy for Convenience: The Need for Stricter FTC Regulations in an Age of Smartphone Surveillance Ashton McKinnon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Ashton McKinnon, Sacrificing Privacy for Convenience: The Need for Stricter FTC Regulations in an Age of Smartphone Surveillance, 34 J. Nat’l Ass’n Admin. L. Judiciary 484 (2014) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol34/iss2/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Sacrificing Privacy for Convenience: The Need for Stricter FTC Regulations in an Age of Smartphone Surveillance By Ashton McKinnon* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 486 II. THE SMARTPHONE .................................................................... 488 III. APPS ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FAST TRACK CONVENIENCE STORES REDEFINE CONVENIENCE Zebra RFID Printer Pays for Itself in Six Months
    FAST TRACK CONVENIENCE STORES REDEFINE CONVENIENCE Zebra RFID Printer Pays for Itself in Six Months About Fast Track Convenience For more than two decades, Sterling Services has offered fresh cuisine selections for vending, dining room management and executive catering to customers in the Detroit Metro area. Sterling Services has broken new ground with Fast Track Convenience powered by Freedom Shopping, self- checkout convenience stores that use RFID technology. Challenge Zebra® RZ400™ Printer In a society where people are constantly on the go—to work, school or to work out—convenient food options are not just a nicety; they’re a necessity. Customer Fast Track Convenience (Sterling Services) Offices, schools, fitness clubs, hospitals and other facilities have tried to Industry meet those needs with self-service vending machines or manned cafes. Retail Vending limits options to a few dozen items while staffed cafes are costly and only open certain hours. In fact, a business can spend $50,000 to Challenge To offer customers fresh cuisine selections $150,000 per year operating an on-site cafeteria. without the hassle of limited vending machines or costly manned cafes. After more than 20 years of offering vending and catering services, Sterling Services recently took its business to the next level. A light bulb Zebra Solutions Zebra RZ400 printer went off when the company discovered radio frequency (RFID) self- checkout technology at a trade show. Results • Fast Track stores sell more than double Pioneered by Freedom Shopping, a North Carolina-based technology what vending machines yielded at the same locations—and offer larger, more company, the solution provides RFID kiosks for retail locations, allowing varied items.
    [Show full text]
  • Off the Beaten Track
    Off the Beaten Track To have your recording considered for review in Sing Out!, please submit two copies (one for one of our reviewers and one for in- house editorial work, song selection for the magazine and eventual inclusion in the Sing Out! Resource Center). All recordings received are included in “Publication Noted” (which follows “Off the Beaten Track”). Send two copies of your recording, and the appropriate background material, to Sing Out!, P.O. Box 5460 (for shipping: 512 E. Fourth St.), Bethlehem, PA 18015, Attention “Off The Beaten Track.” Sincere thanks to this issue’s panel of musical experts: Richard Dorsett, Tom Druckenmiller, Mark Greenberg, Victor K. Heyman, Stephanie P. Ledgin, John Lupton, Angela Page, Mike Regenstreif, Seth Rogovoy, Ken Roseman, Peter Spencer, Michael Tearson, Theodoros Toskos, Rich Warren, Matt Watroba, Rob Weir and Sule Greg Wilson. that led to a career traveling across coun- the two keyboard instruments. How I try as “The Singing Troubadour.” He per- would have loved to hear some of the more formed in a variety of settings with a rep- unusual groupings of instruments as pic- ertoire that ranged from opera to traditional tured in the notes. The sound of saxo- songs. He also began an investigation of phones, trumpets, violins and cellos must the music of various utopian societies in have been glorious! The singing is strong America. and sincere with nary a hint of sophistica- With his investigation of the music of tion, as of course it should be, as the Shak- VARIOUS the Shakers he found a sect which both ers were hardly ostentatious.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL C01 09/26/2014 19:24:59 Page 2 C01 09/26/2014 19:24:59 Page 3
    c01 09/26/2014 19:24:59 Page 1 What You Have Always Done Isn’t Working I Anymore COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL c01 09/26/2014 19:24:59 Page 2 c01 09/26/2014 19:24:59 Page 3 Don’t Get Netflixed: Your Current Business 1 Model Isn’t Going to Last Much Longer he nuclear industry measures how long a radioactive material T will retain its potency by its half-life, which is the time it takes for the material to lose half of its radioactivity. For instance, the half- life of Uranium-235 is 700 million years. No wonder nuclear prolifer- ation is so feared! During the industrial era the half-life of a business model has been measured in generations. Business models have al- ways lasted a long time. Business models rarely changed and were handed down from generation to generation. Most business leaders have never had to change their business model. Most CEOs have led a single business model throughout their entire career. They never learned how to change a business model in business school or from their peers, who also have never had to change their business models. During the industrial era once the basic rules for how a company creates, delivers, and captures value were established they became etched in stone, fortified by functional silos, and sustained by reinforcing company cultures. All of a company’s DNA, energy, and resources were focused on scaling the business model and beating back competition attempting to do a better job executing the same business model. Companies with nearly identical business models slugged it out for market share within well-defined industry sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Shopping Customer Experience Study Commissioned by UPS May 2012
    Online Shopping Customer Experience Study Commissioned by UPS May 2012 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Susan Kleinman comScore, Inc. 212-497-1783 [email protected] © 2012 comScore, Inc. Contents Introducing the Online Shopping Customer Experience Study..................................................................... 3 Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Online Shopping Industry Snapshot ............................................................................................................. 4 Online Shopping Experience and Satisfaction .............................................................................................. 5 Discounts and Specials ............................................................................................................................. 7 Comparison Shopping ............................................................................................................................... 8 Retailer Recommendation ......................................................................................................................... 9 Check-Out Process ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Delivery Timing ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Shipping and Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • MARKETING PLAN OUTLINE (Recommended Length: 3-5 Pages)
    MARKETING PLAN OUTLINE (Recommended Length: 3-5 pages) 1. Company Name 2. Marketing or Promotional Statement 5-7 words briefly describing your business and its product or service 3. Product or Service Description Nature and detailed description of your product or service What do you sell? What are the benefits your products/services? What is special, unique, or different about your product or service? Describe your Unique Selling Proposition (USP). 4. Market Analysis Service/Industry Background and Description Market Segments Current Market Situation Analysis Competitive Analysis - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Marketing Research Who are your competitors? What do your competitors do better than you? What do you do better than your competitors? What is your competitive position? How large is your overall market? What is your market share? Is your market share increasing, shrinking, or stable? How do your prices compare to your competitors' prices? How do you establish prices? What are your business strengths? What are your business weaknesses? What might keep you from achieving your goals? Is your market changing in any ways? What facts or new information do you need to figure out? 5. Target Market Target Market Definition Demographic and Psychographic Profile for Primary and Secondary Customers What are your target markets? Who are your current customers? What are their buying habits? Why do your customers actually buy your goods/services? Who are your best customers and prospects? Marketing Plan Outline (Continued) 6. Marketing Objectives Revenues (Year one, Year two, Year three) Profits (Year one, Year two, Year three) Market Share – Optional What are your overall goals? 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel
    Compromise vs. Compromises: Preferences for Bipartisanship in the American Electorate Laurel Harbridge* Assistant Professor, Northwestern University Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 (847) 467-1147 Neil Malhotra Associate Professor, Stanford Graduate School of Business [email protected] 655 Knight Way Stanford, CA 94035 (408) 772-7969 Brian F. Harrison PhD Candidate, Northwestern University [email protected] Scott Hall 601 University Place Evanston, IL 60208 * Corresponding author. We thank Time-Sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences (TESS) for providing the majority of the financial support of this project. TESS is funded by the National Science Foundation (SES- 0818839). A previous version of this paper was scheduled for presentation at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Abstract Public opinion surveys regularly assert that Americans want political leaders to work together and to engage in bipartisan compromise. If so, why has Congress become increasingly acrimonious even though the American public wants it to be “bipartisan”? Many scholars claim that this is simply a breakdown of representation. We offer another explanation: although people profess support for “bipartisanship” in an abstract sense, what they desire procedurally out of their party representatives in Congress is to not compromise with the other side. To test this argument, we conduct two experiments in which we alter aspects of the political context to see how people respond to parties (not) coming together to achieve broadly popular public policy goals. We find that citizens’ proclaimed desire for bipartisanship in actuality reflects self-serving partisan desires.
    [Show full text]