1 Selling Death: a Comparative Analysis of the Tobacco And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Description of the Tobacco Market, Manufacturing of Cigarettes and the Market of Related Non-Tobacco Products
COUNCIL OF Brussels, 21 December 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 18068/12 Interinstitutional File: ADD 3 2012/0366 (COD) SAN 337 MI 850 FISC 206 CODEC 3117 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 20 December 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentat ion and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3). ________________________ Encl.: SWD(2012) 452 final (Part 3) 18068/12 ADD 3 JS/ic 1 DG B 4B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.12.2012 SWD(2012) 452 final Part 3 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (Text with EEA relevance) {COM(2012) 788 final} {SWD(2012) 453 final} EN EN A.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TOBACCO MARKET, MANUFACTURING OF CIGARETTES AND THE MARKET OF RELATED NON-TOBACCO PRODUCTS A.2.1. The tobacco market .................................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.1. Tobacco products .............................................................................................. 1 A.2.1.2. -
Monograph 21. the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control
Monograph 21: The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control Section 6 Economic and Other Implications of Tobacco Control Chapter 15 Employment Impact of Tobacco Control 543 Chapter 15 Employment Impact of Tobacco Control Adoption and implementation of effective tobacco control policy interventions are often influenced by concerns over the potential employment impact of such policies. This chapter examines employment issues and discusses the following: . An overview of current tobacco-related employment, including employment in tobacco growing, manufacturing, wholesale and retail sales, and tobacco- expenditure-induced employment . Trends in tobacco-related employment including the shift toward low- and middle- income countries . Impact of globalization, increased workforce productivity, and new technologies on tobacco-related employment . Impact of tobacco control policies on overall employment and how this impact varies based on the type of tobacco economy in specific countries. Econometric studies show that in most countries tobacco control policies would have an overall neutral or positive effect on overall employment. In the few countries that depend heavily on tobacco exporting, global implementation of effective tobacco control policies would produce a gradual decline in employment. Around the world, employment in tobacco manufacturing has decreased primarily because of improvements in manufacturing technology, allowing more tobacco products to be manufactured by fewer workers, and by the shift from state-owned to private ownership, -
Assessing Oregon's Retail Environment
ASSESSING OREGON’S RETAIL ENVIRONMENT SHINING LIGHT ON TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS If we thought the tobacco industry didn’t advertise anymore, it’s time to think again. This assessment shines light on how the industry spends over $100 million to promote its products in Oregon stores and to hook the next generation. DID YOU KNOW THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY SPENDS OVER $100 MILLION EACH YEAR *1 IN OREGON? Tobacco products are front and center, where people — including kids — will see them every day. To gauge what tobacco retail marketing looks like across the state, local health department staf and volunteers visited nearly 2,000 Oregon tobacco retailers in 2018. Data provide striking information about how the tobacco industry pushes its deadly products across Oregon. The fndings are clear: The tobacco industry is aggressively marketing to people in Oregon, and especially targets youth, communities of color and people living with lower incomes. This report outlines fndings from the retail assessment and explores ways Oregon communities can reduce tobacco marketing, help people who smoke quit, and keep youth from starting — and ultimately save thousands of Oregon lives each year. * This amount does not include spending on advertising and marketing of e-cigarettes, for which statewide data is not yet available. When added in, this number climbs even higher. THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY SPENDS BILLIONS TO RECRUIT NEW CUSTOMERS. Every year, the tobacco industry spends E-cigarette companies rapidly increased their more than $8.6 billion nationally on tobacco retail advertising from $6.4 million to $115 advertising.2 When TV and billboard advertising million nationally between 2011 and 2014 for tobacco was restricted (in 1971 and 1998, alone.4 Advertising restrictions do not apply to respectively),3 the tobacco industry shifted its e-cigarettes. -
Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment
September 2019 COMMERCIAL TOBACCO, HEALTH, & THE ENVIRONMENT The Problems September 2019 This synopsis is provided for educational purposes only and is not to be construed as a legal opinion or as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Laws cited are current as of September 2019. The Public Health Law Center provides legal information and education about tobacco and health, but does not provide legal representation. Readers with questions about the application of the law to specific facts are encouraged to consult legal counsel familiar with the laws of their jurisdictions. Suggested citation: Thomas Hexum and Hudson Kingston, Public Health Law Center, Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment: The Problems (2019). This publication was made possible by the financial support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Cover photo by Karen Mason. Copyright © 2019 Public Health Law Center @PHealthLawCtr publichealthlawcenter youtube.com/PublicHealthLawCenterSaintPaul www.publichealthlawcenter.org Commercial Tobacco, Health, & the Environment September 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 TOBACCO GROWING AND CURING 5 Deforestation 5 Food and Water Security 7 Pesticide Usage 7 Farm Worker Conditions 8 TOBACCO MANUFACTURING 9 Resource Usage 10 Industrial Waste and Emissions 11 TRANSPORTATION OF TOBACCO 11 TOBACCO CONSUMPTION 12 Secondhand Smoke 12 Thirdhand Smoke 13 Cigarette Lighting 15 TOBACCO PRODUCT WASTE 15 Cigarette Waste Toxicity 15 Litter Prevalence 17 Electronic Cigarettes and Heated Products 18 CONCLUSION 19 ENDNOTES -
Food Beverages and Tobacco.Vp
Sectors Rural Policy Briefs International Labour Office o n a t i l o p a Food, drink and N o i l u i G / tobacco industry O A F driving rural © employment and development The Food and Drink sector provides safe, high quality, healthy and affordable food to millions of people worldwide. Together with the tobacco industry, the sector is a large source of manufacturing output and employment. However, it faces a confluence of challenges such as climate change, changes in food supply and demand, imbalances in the governance of food production systems, food price volatility and food security. Addressing decent work deficits contributes to tackling these issues and to broader development goals. Facts and figures Food and Drink < The food and drink (FD) industry accounted for 4 per < The FD industry purchases up to 80 percent of cent of world GDP in 2005.1 agricultural products, contributing to rural livelihoods. < While the FD industry is declining in developed < Developing and emerging economies are the main countries, it is significantly increasing in emerging and source of growth in world food demand and in the trade developing economies. Between 2000 and 2008, it of food products. grew in Brazil and China by 68 and 178 percent < Food consumption is increasingly diverse and moving respectively.2 away from staple foods, especially in emerging < Despite rapid expansion of the FD industry in economies. At the same time, nearly one billion people developing and emerging economies, global remain food insecure. employment grew at a slower pace than in past Tobacco decades, from an estimated 20 million in 2002 to 22 < 3 Nearly 1.2 million workers operate in the tobacco million workers in 2007. -
News Releases Kellogg Company
NEWS RELEASES KELLOGG COMPANY VOLUNTARILY RECALLS SELECT PACKAGES OF KELLOGG'S® CORN POPS®, KELLOGG'S® HONEY SMACKS®, KELLOGG'S® FROOT LOOPS® AND KELLOGG'S® APPLE JACKS® BATTLE CREEK, Mich., June 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Working in consultation with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Kellogg Company (NYSE: K) is implementing a voluntary recall of certain breakfast cereals due to an uncharacteristic off-flavor and smell coming from the liner in the package. Only products with the letters "KN" following the Better If Used Before Date are included in the recall. Products with a "KM" designation are NOT included in the recall. In addition, no products in Canada are affected. Kellogg's® Apple Jacks® UPC 3800039136 1: 17 ounce package with Better if Used Before Dates between APR 10 2011 and JUN 22 2011 UPC 3800039132 3: 8.7 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between JUN 03 2011 and JUN 22 2011 Kellogg's® Corn Pops® UPC 3800039109 5: 12.5 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 UPC 3800039111 8: 17.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 UPC 3800039116 3: 9.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between APR 05 2011 and JUN 22 2011 Kellogg's® Froot Loops® UPC 3800039118 7: 12.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 UPC 3800039120 0: 17 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 UPC 3800039125 5: 8.7 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 Kellogg's® Honey Smacks® UPC 3800039103 3: 15.3 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011 While the potential for serious health problems is low, some consumers are sensitive to the uncharacteristic off-flavor and smell and should not eat the recalled products because of possible temporary symptoms, including nausea and diarrhea. -
TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS Public Health Policy Change Webinar Series
Public Health Policy Change Series KNOWING THE ENEMY: TOBACCO INDUSTRY TACTICS Public Health Policy Change Webinar Series • Providing substantive public health policy knowledge, competencies & research in an interactive format • Covering public health policy topics surrounding Tobacco, Obesity, School and Worksite Wellness, and more • Monthly from 12:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Central Time • Visit http://publichealthlawcenter.org/ for more information The legal information and assistance provided in this webinar does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. Upcoming Webinars in the Series Paid Sick Leave Laws Thursday, February 21, 12: p.m. – 1:30 p.m. CST Visit www.publichealthlawcenter.org for more information. How to Use Webex If you can hear us through your computer, you do not need to dial into the call. Just adjust your computer speakers as needed. If you need technical assistance, call Webex Technical Support at 1-866-863-3904. All participants are muted. Type a question into the Q & A panel for our panelists to answer. Send your questions in at any time. This webinar is being recorded. If you arrive late, miss details or would like to share it, we will send you a link to this recording after the session has ended. Today’s Agenda • Introduction (Desmond Jenson) • Tobacco Industry Interference: Then and Now (Bronson Frick) • Tobacco Industry Tactics: Building Credibility and Undermining Tobacco Control (Patricia McDaniel, PhD) • Q&A/Feedback from you (moderated by Desmond Jenson) The legal information and assistance provided in this webinar does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. U.S. v. Philip Morris “Defendants attempted to and, at times, did prevent/stop ongoing research, hide existing research, and destroy sensitive documents in order to protect their public positions on smoking and health, avoid or limit liability for smoking and health related claims in litigation, and prevent regulatory limitations on the cigarette industry” U.S. -
Tobacco and the Economy: Farms, Jobs, and Communities, by H
Tobacco and the Economy: Farms, Jobs, and Communities, By H. Frederick Gale, Jr., Linda Foreman, and Thomas Capehart, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 789. Abstract Public health policies intended to reduce the incidence of smoking-related disease adversely affect thousands of tobacco farmers, manufacturers, and other businesses that produce, distribute, and sell tobacco products. This report assesses the likely impacts of declining tobacco demand, and identifies the types of workers, farms, businesses, and communities that are most vulnerable to loss of tobacco income and jobs. The dollar impact on the farm sector of a reduction in cigarette demand will be smaller than that experienced by manufacturing, wholesale, retail, and transportation businesses, but tobacco farms and their communities may have the most difficulty adjusting. Many tobacco farmers lack good alternatives to tobacco, and they have tobacco-specific equipment, buildings, and experience. Most com- munities will make the transition to a smaller tobacco industry with little difficulty, because tobacco accounts for a small share of the local economy. However, a num- ber of counties depend on tobacco for a significant share of local income. Acknowledgments The authors received helpful comments on the manuscript from Will Snell and Ron Hustedde of the University of Kentucky, Wayne Purcell of Virginia Tech, Blake Brown of North Carolina State University, and Jim Johnson of the Economic Research Service. Valuable insight and information were also obtained from William Mezger of the Virginia Employment Commission, John Knapp of the University of Virginia, Chris Beacham of the North Carolina Rural Development Center, and Gerry Cohn of the Rural Advancement Foundation International. -
Teaching Case ______Journal of Applied Case Research Sponsored by the Southwest Case Research Association
Teaching Case ______________________________ Journal of Applied Case Research Sponsored by the Southwest Case Research Association Kellogg’s Healthier Cereals: An Ethical Dilemma? Thomas D. Tolleson Texas Wesleyan University The genesis of this case was the result of a class project. The author would like to thank Marco Guzman, Matty Horton, Shayla Impson, Chris Taylor and Courtney Williams for their contributions to this case. © Journal of Applied Case Research Accepted: December 2007 INTRODUCTION Vicki thought of herself as a good mother. She planned her grocery purchases and attempted to provide nutritional food for her husband and son. Her three-year-old son, Chaden, was a “picky” eater, so finding healthy foods that he would eat was a challenge, especially at breakfast. About the only food that Chaden would eat for breakfast was cereal. He was particularly fond of Kellogg’s Frosty Flakes and thought “Tony the Tiger” was super. She had even made Chaden a “Tony the Tiger” costume for Halloween. Vicki could usually get Chaden to eat breakfast when she said that “Tony the Tiger” was proud of him for eating a bowl of Frosty Flakes and milk. Vicki was concerned, however, with the sugar content of Frosty Flakes. She had recently returned to school to pursue a degree in early childhood education and had researched the impact of sugar on children’s health, especially childhood obesity. She was relieved when Kellogg’s introduced a low-sugar version of its Frosty Flakes. Vicki was pleased that Chaden’s favorite cereal was now a healthy choice. Or was it? KELLOGG’S The Beginning During the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, two brothers, Dr. -
BID SOLICITATION Printed: 5/1/2006 STATE of RHODE ISLAND and PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS CAPITOL HILL PROVIDENCE RI 02908
Page 1 of 6 BID SOLICITATION Printed: 5/1/2006 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS CAPITOL HILL PROVIDENCE RI 02908 BID NUMBER: B06305 TITLE: CEREALS, RTE BUYER: ALMA MILLER BID OPENING DATE AND TIME: PHONE #: (401) 222 - 2142 ext. 124 BLANKET PERIOD: 7/1/2006 - 12/31/2006 05/22/2006 11:30 AM S B CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS I DOC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER H DOC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER L 144 POWER ROAD I 144 POWER ROAD L CRANSTON RI 02920 P CRANSTON RI 02920 T T O O Requisition Number(s): R77C070348 Item Class-Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Total BLANKET REQUIREMENTS: 7/1/06 - 12/31/06 CEREAL, READY TO EAT ALL CASES MUST BE BAR CODED. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL ORDERS WILL BE PLACED FOR ACTUAL QUANTITIES REQUIRED. THE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTION CENTER WILL PROVIDE ORDERING AND INVOICING INSTRUCTIONS. It is the Vendor's responsibility to check and download any and all addenda from the RIVIP. This offer may not be considered unless a signed RIVIP generated Bidder Certification Cover Form is attached and the Unit Price column is completed. The signed Certification Cover Form must be attached to the front of the offer. When delivering offers in person to One Capitol Hill, vendors are advised to allow at least one hour additional time for clearance through security checkpoints. DELIVERY: RIVIP VENDOR ID#: DO NOT SIGN BID ON THIS PAGE! TERMS OF PAYMENT: USE CERTIFICATION COVER FORM. Page 2 of 6 BID SOLICITATION Printed: 5/1/2006 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS CAPITOL HILL PROVIDENCE RI 02908 BID NUMBER: B06305 TITLE: CEREALS, RTE BUYER: ALMA MILLER BID OPENING DATE AND TIME: PHONE #: (401) 222 - 2142 ext. -
STUDENT COMMERCIAL TOBACCO USE in SCHOOLS Alternative Measures
MINNESOTA October 2019 STUDENT COMMERCIAL TOBACCO USE IN SCHOOLS Alternative Measures School policies regulating the use and possession of commercial tobacco products,1 including electronic delivery devices (e.g., e-cigarettes, vaping devices, JUUL, Suorin), often contain punitive measures for student violations. This publication provides sample language and ideas for evidence-based solutions and information as to why these alternative measures may be more effective than suspension and expulsion at addressing student tobacco use and nicotine addiction as part of a school’s Commercial Tobacco-Free Policy. I. The tobacco industry has historically and continues to target youth to maintain profits, especially in and around schools.2 Schools should consider these predatory tactics when creating or modifying a policy to address youth possession and use of commercial tobacco in schools. When considering how to effectively address youth use and possession of commercial tobacco products in schools, it is important to understand how pervasive the industry’s targeting of youth and young adults with these highly addictive products has been for several decades. Overwhelming evidence, including the www.publichealthlawcenter.org October 2019 tobacco industry’s own documents, shows that from the 1950s to the present the tobacco industry intentionally and strategically studied and marketed commercial tobacco products to youth in order to recruit “replacement smokers” to stay in business.3 In 1981, a Philip Morris representative said, “[t]oday’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential regular customer.”4 The tobacco industry knows that “the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens.”5 Well-documented examples of the tobacco industry’s unethical efforts to capture the youth market are school “education programs,” which were promoted and distributed to schools in the 1980s and 1990s. -
Kellogg's Annual Report 2008
KELLOGG COMPANY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT ANNUAL REPORT WHAT MAKES ® ™ At Kellogg Company, we have: • For more than a century, Kellogg Company has been dedicated to producing great-tasting, high-quality, nutritious foods that consumers around the world know and love. With 2008 sales of nearly $13 billion, Kellogg Company is the world’s leading producer of cereal, as well as a leading producer of convenience foods, including cookies, crackers, toaster pastries, cereal bars, frozen waffles and vegetarian foods. We market more than 1,500 products in over 180 countries, and our brands include such trusted names as Kellogg’s, Keebler, Pop-Tarts, Eggo, Cheez-It, Nutri-Grain, Rice Krispies, Morningstar Farms, Famous Amos, Special K, All-Bran, Frosted Mini-Wheats, Club, Kashi, Bear Naked, Just Right, Vector, Guardian, Optivita, Choco Trésor, Frosties, Sucrilhos, Vive, Muslix and Zucaritas. Kellogg products are manufactured in 19 countries around the world. We enter 2009 with a rich heritage of success and a steadfast commit- ment to continuing to deliver sustainable and dependable growth in the future. TWO 2008 ANNUAL REPORT A commitment ™ to sustainable and dependable GROWTH ™ 2008 FINANciaL HigHLigHTS / DELIVERING STRONG RESULTS (dollars in millions, except per share data) 2008 Change 2007 Change 2006 Change Net sales $ 12,822 9% $ 11,776 8% $ 10,907 7% Gross profit as a % of net sales 41.9 % (2.1 pts) 44.0 % (0.2 pts) 44.2 % (0.7 pts) Operating profit 1,953 5% 1,868 6% 1,766 1% Net earnings 1,148 4% 1,103 10% 1,004 2% Net earnings per share Basic 3.01 8% 2.79 10% 2.53 6% Diluted 2.99 8% 2.76 10% 2.51 6%(b) Cash flow (net cash provided by operating activities, reduced by capital expenditure)(a) 806 (22%) 1,031 8% 957 24% Dividends per share $ 1.30 8% $ 1.20 5% $ 1.14 8% (a) Cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, reduced by capital expenditures.