CHAPTER 7 – RANDOM NUMBERS and OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING Announcements Read Chapter 7 in the Conery Textbook (Explorations in Computing)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Math/CS 467 (Lesieutre) Homework 2 September 9, 2020 Submission
Math/CS 467 (Lesieutre) Homework 2 September 9, 2020 Submission instructions: Upload your solutions, minus the code, to Gradescope, like you did last week. Email your code to me as an attachment at [email protected], including the string HW2 in the subject line so I can filter them. Problem 1. Both prime numbers and perfect squares get more and more uncommon among larger and larger numbers. But just how uncommon are they? a) Roughly how many perfect squares are there less than or equal to N? p 2 For a positivep integer k, notice that k is less than N if and only if k ≤ N. So there are about N possibilities for k. b) Are there likely to be more prime numbers or perfect squares less than 10100? Give an estimate of the number of each. p There are about 1010 = 1050 perfect squares. According to the prime number theorem, there are about 10100 10100 π(10100) ≈ = = 1098 · log 10 = 2:3 · 1098: log(10100) 100 log 10 That’s a lot more primes than squares. (Note that the “log” in the prime number theorem is the natural log. If you use log10, you won’t get the right answer.) Problem 2. Compute g = gcd(1661; 231). Find integers a and b so that 1661a + 231b = g. (You can do this by hand or on the computer; either submit the code or show your work.) We do this using the Euclidean algorithm. At each step, we keep track of how to write ri as a combination of a and b. -
Transmit Processing in MIMO Wireless Systems
IEEE 6th CAS Symp. on Emerging Technologies: Mobile and Wireless Comm Shanghai, China, May 31-June 2,2004 Transmit Processing in MIMO Wireless Systems Josef A. Nossek, Michael Joham, and Wolfgang Utschick Institute for Circuit Theory and Signal Processing, Munich University of Technology, 80333 Munich, Germany Phone: +49 (89) 289-28501, Email: [email protected] Abstract-By restricting the receive filter to he scalar, we weighted by a scalar in Section IV. In Section V, we compare derive the optimizations for linear transmit processing from the linear transmit and receive processing. respective joint optimizations of transmit and receive filters. We A popular nonlinear transmit processing scheme is Tom- can identify three filter types similar to receive processing: the nmamit matched filter (TxMF), the transmit zero-forcing filter linson Harashima precoding (THP) originally proposed for (TxZE), and the transmil Menerfilter (TxWF). The TxW has dispersive single inpur single output (SISO) systems in [IO], similar convergence properties as the receive Wiener filter, i.e. [Ill, but can also be applied to MlMO systems [12], [13]. it converges to the matched filter and the zero-forcing Pter for THP is similar to decision feedback equalization (DFE), hut low and high signal to noise ratio, respectively. Additionally, the contrary to DFE, THP feeds back the already transmitted mean square error (MSE) of the TxWF is a lower hound for the MSEs of the TxMF and the TxZF. symbols to reduce the interference caused by these symbols The optimizations for the linear transmit filters are extended at the receivers. Although THP is based on the application of to obtain the respective Tomlinson-Harashimp precoding (THP) nonlinear modulo operators at the receivers and the transmitter, solutions. -
6Th Online Learning #2 MATH Subject: Mathematics State: Ohio
6th Online Learning #2 MATH Subject: Mathematics State: Ohio Student Name: Teacher Name: School Name: 1 Yari was doing the long division problem shown below. When she finishes, her teacher tells her she made a mistake. Find Yari's mistake. Explain it to her using at least 2 complete sentences. Then, re-do the long division problem correctly. 2 Use the computation shown below to find the products. Explain how you found your answers. (a) 189 × 16 (b) 80 × 16 (c) 9 × 16 3 Solve. 34,992 ÷ 81 = ? 4 The total amount of money collected by a store for sweatshirt sales was $10,000. Each sweatshirt sold for $40. What was the total number of sweatshirts sold by the store? (A) 100 (B) 220 (C) 250 (D) 400 5 Justin divided 403 by a number and got a quotient of 26 with a remainder of 13. What was the number Justin divided by? (A) 13 (B) 14 (C) 15 (D) 16 6 What is the quotient of 13,632 ÷ 48? (A) 262 R36 (B) 272 (C) 284 (D) 325 R32 7 What is the result when 75,069 is divided by 45? 8 What is the value of 63,106 ÷ 72? Write your answer below. 9 Divide. 21,900 ÷ 25 Write the exact quotient below. 10 The manager of a bookstore ordered 480 copies of a book. The manager paid a total of $7,440 for the books. The books arrived at the store in 5 cartons. Each carton contained the same number of books. A worker unpacked books at a rate of 48 books every 2 minutes. -
Download the Basketballplayer.Ngql Fle Here
Nebula Graph Database Manual v1.2.1 Min Wu, Amber Zhang, XiaoDan Huang 2021 Vesoft Inc. Table of contents Table of contents 1. Overview 4 1.1 About This Manual 4 1.2 Welcome to Nebula Graph 1.2.1 Documentation 5 1.3 Concepts 10 1.4 Quick Start 18 1.5 Design and Architecture 32 2. Query Language 43 2.1 Reader 43 2.2 Data Types 44 2.3 Functions and Operators 47 2.4 Language Structure 62 2.5 Statement Syntax 76 3. Build Develop and Administration 128 3.1 Build 128 3.2 Installation 134 3.3 Configuration 141 3.4 Account Management Statement 161 3.5 Batch Data Management 173 3.6 Monitoring and Statistics 192 3.7 Development and API 199 4. Data Migration 200 4.1 Nebula Exchange 200 5. Nebula Graph Studio 224 5.1 Change Log 224 5.2 About Nebula Graph Studio 228 5.3 Deploy and connect 232 5.4 Quick start 237 5.5 Operation guide 248 6. Contributions 272 6.1 Contribute to Documentation 272 6.2 Cpp Coding Style 273 6.3 How to Contribute 274 6.4 Pull Request and Commit Message Guidelines 277 7. Appendix 278 7.1 Comparison Between Cypher and nGQL 278 - 2/304 - 2021 Vesoft Inc. Table of contents 7.2 Comparison Between Gremlin and nGQL 283 7.3 Comparison Between SQL and nGQL 298 7.4 Vertex Identifier and Partition 303 - 3/304 - 2021 Vesoft Inc. 1. Overview 1. Overview 1.1 About This Manual This is the Nebula Graph User Manual. -
Three Methods of Finding Remainder on the Operation of Modular
Zin Mar Win, Khin Mar Cho; International Journal of Advance Research and Development (Volume 5, Issue 5) Available online at: www.ijarnd.com Three methods of finding remainder on the operation of modular exponentiation by using calculator 1Zin Mar Win, 2Khin Mar Cho 1University of Computer Studies, Myitkyina, Myanmar 2University of Computer Studies, Pyay, Myanmar ABSTRACT The primary purpose of this paper is that the contents of the paper were to become a learning aid for the learners. Learning aids enhance one's learning abilities and help to increase one's learning potential. They may include books, diagram, computer, recordings, notes, strategies, or any other appropriate items. In this paper we would review the types of modulo operations and represent the knowledge which we have been known with the easiest ways. The modulo operation is finding of the remainder when dividing. The modulus operator abbreviated “mod” or “%” in many programming languages is useful in a variety of circumstances. It is commonly used to take a randomly generated number and reduce that number to a random number on a smaller range, and it can also quickly tell us if one number is a factor of another. If we wanted to know if a number was odd or even, we could use modulus to quickly tell us by asking for the remainder of the number when divided by 2. Modular exponentiation is a type of exponentiation performed over a modulus. The operation of modular exponentiation calculates the remainder c when an integer b rose to the eth power, bᵉ, is divided by a positive integer m such as c = be mod m [1]. -
13A. Lists of Numbers
13A. Lists of Numbers Topics: Lists of numbers List Methods: Void vs Fruitful Methods Setting up Lists A Function that returns a list We Have Seen Lists Before Recall that the rgb encoding of a color involves a triplet of numbers: MyColor = [.3,.4,.5] DrawDisk(0,0,1,FillColor = MyColor) MyColor is a list. A list of numbers is a way of assembling a sequence of numbers. Terminology x = [3.0, 5.0, -1.0, 0.0, 3.14] How we talk about what is in a list: 5.0 is an item in the list x. 5.0 is an entry in the list x. 5.0 is an element in the list x. 5.0 is a value in the list x. Get used to the synonyms. A List Has a Length The following would assign the value of 5 to the variable n: x = [3.0, 5.0, -1.0, 0.0, 3.14] n = len(x) The Entries in a List are Accessed Using Subscripts The following would assign the value of -1.0 to the variable a: x = [3.0, 5.0, -1.0, 0.0, 3.14] a = x[2] A List Can Be Sliced This: x = [10,40,50,30,20] y = x[1:3] z = x[:3] w = x[3:] Is same as: x = [10,40,50,30,20] y = [40,50] z = [10,40,50] w = [30,20] Lists are Similar to Strings s: ‘x’ ‘L’ ‘1’ ‘?’ ‘a’ ‘C’ x: 3 5 2 7 0 4 A string is a sequence of characters. -
The Best of Both Worlds?
The Best of Both Worlds? Reimplementing an Object-Oriented System with Functional Programming on the .NET Platform and Comparing the Two Paradigms Erik Bugge Thesis submitted for the degree of Master in Informatics: Programming and Networks 60 credits Department of Informatics Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Autumn 2019 The Best of Both Worlds? Reimplementing an Object-Oriented System with Functional Programming on the .NET Platform and Comparing the Two Paradigms Erik Bugge © 2019 Erik Bugge The Best of Both Worlds? http://www.duo.uio.no/ Printed: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo Abstract Programming paradigms are categories that classify languages based on their features. Each paradigm category contains rules about how the program is built. Comparing programming paradigms and languages is important, because it lets developers make more informed decisions when it comes to choosing the right technology for a system. Making meaningful comparisons between paradigms and languages is challenging, because the subjects of comparison are often so dissimilar that the process is not always straightforward, or does not always yield particularly valuable results. Therefore, multiple avenues of comparison must be explored in order to get meaningful information about the pros and cons of these technologies. This thesis looks at the difference between the object-oriented and functional programming paradigms on a higher level, before delving in detail into a development process that consisted of reimplementing parts of an object- oriented system into functional code. Using results from major comparative studies, exploring high-level differences between the two paradigms’ tools for modular programming and general program decompositions, and looking at the development process described in detail in this thesis in light of the aforementioned findings, a comparison on multiple levels was done. -
Ground and Explanation in Mathematics
volume 19, no. 33 ncreased attention has recently been paid to the fact that in math- august 2019 ematical practice, certain mathematical proofs but not others are I recognized as explaining why the theorems they prove obtain (Mancosu 2008; Lange 2010, 2015a, 2016; Pincock 2015). Such “math- ematical explanation” is presumably not a variety of causal explana- tion. In addition, the role of metaphysical grounding as underwriting a variety of explanations has also recently received increased attention Ground and Explanation (Correia and Schnieder 2012; Fine 2001, 2012; Rosen 2010; Schaffer 2016). Accordingly, it is natural to wonder whether mathematical ex- planation is a variety of grounding explanation. This paper will offer several arguments that it is not. in Mathematics One obstacle facing these arguments is that there is currently no widely accepted account of either mathematical explanation or grounding. In the case of mathematical explanation, I will try to avoid this obstacle by appealing to examples of proofs that mathematicians themselves have characterized as explanatory (or as non-explanatory). I will offer many examples to avoid making my argument too dependent on any single one of them. I will also try to motivate these characterizations of various proofs as (non-) explanatory by proposing an account of what makes a proof explanatory. In the case of grounding, I will try to stick with features of grounding that are relatively uncontroversial among grounding theorists. But I will also Marc Lange look briefly at how some of my arguments would fare under alternative views of grounding. I hope at least to reveal something about what University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill grounding would have to look like in order for a theorem’s grounds to mathematically explain why that theorem obtains. -
Whole Numbers
03_WNCP_Gr4_U02.qxd.qxd 3/19/07 12:04 PM Page 32 U N I T Whole Numbers Learning Goals • recognize and read numbers from 1 to 10 000 • read and write numbers in standard form, expanded form, and written form • compare and order numbers • use diagrams to show relationships • estimate sums and differences • add and subtract 3-digit and 4-digit numbers mentally • use personal strategies to add and subtract • pose and solve problems 32 03_WNCP_Gr4_U02.qxd.qxd 3/19/07 12:04 PM Page 33 Key Words expanded form The elephant is the world’s largest animal. There are two kinds of elephants. standard form The African elephant can be found in most parts of Africa. Venn diagram The Asian elephant can be found in Southeast Asia. Carroll diagram African elephants are larger and heavier than their Asian cousins. The mass of a typical adult African female elephant is about 3600 kg. The mass of a typical male is about 5500 kg. The mass of a typical adult Asian female elephant is about 2720 kg. The mass of a typical male is about 4990 kg. •How could you find how much greater the mass of the African female elephant is than the Asian female elephant? •Kandula,a male Asian elephant,had a mass of about 145 kg at birth. Estimate how much mass he will gain from birth to adulthood. •The largest elephant on record was an African male with an estimated mass of about 10 000 kg. About how much greater was the mass of this elephant than the typical African male elephant? 33 03_WNCP_Gr4_U02.qxd.qxd 3/19/07 12:04 PM Page 34 LESSON Whole Numbers to 10 000 The largest marching band ever assembled had 4526 members. -
Functional C
Functional C Pieter Hartel Henk Muller January 3, 1999 i Functional C Pieter Hartel Henk Muller University of Southampton University of Bristol Revision: 6.7 ii To Marijke Pieter To my family and other sources of inspiration Henk Revision: 6.7 c 1995,1996 Pieter Hartel & Henk Muller, all rights reserved. Preface The Computer Science Departments of many universities teach a functional lan- guage as the first programming language. Using a functional language with its high level of abstraction helps to emphasize the principles of programming. Func- tional programming is only one of the paradigms with which a student should be acquainted. Imperative, Concurrent, Object-Oriented, and Logic programming are also important. Depending on the problem to be solved, one of the paradigms will be chosen as the most natural paradigm for that problem. This book is the course material to teach a second paradigm: imperative pro- gramming, using C as the programming language. The book has been written so that it builds on the knowledge that the students have acquired during their first course on functional programming, using SML. The prerequisite of this book is that the principles of programming are already understood; this book does not specifically aim to teach `problem solving' or `programming'. This book aims to: ¡ Familiarise the reader with imperative programming as another way of imple- menting programs. The aim is to preserve the programming style, that is, the programmer thinks functionally while implementing an imperative pro- gram. ¡ Provide understanding of the differences between functional and imperative pro- gramming. Functional programming is a high level activity. -
Fast Integer Division – a Differentiated Offering from C2000 Product Family
Application Report SPRACN6–July 2019 Fast Integer Division – A Differentiated Offering From C2000™ Product Family Prasanth Viswanathan Pillai, Himanshu Chaudhary, Aravindhan Karuppiah, Alex Tessarolo ABSTRACT This application report provides an overview of the different division and modulo (remainder) functions and its associated properties. Later, the document describes how the different division functions can be implemented using the C28x ISA and intrinsics supported by the compiler. Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 2 Different Division Functions ................................................................................................ 2 3 Intrinsic Support Through TI C2000 Compiler ........................................................................... 4 4 Cycle Count................................................................................................................... 6 5 Summary...................................................................................................................... 6 6 References ................................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures 1 Truncated Division Function................................................................................................ 2 2 Floored Division Function................................................................................................... 3 3 Euclidean -
Strength Reduction of Integer Division and Modulo Operations
Strength Reduction of Integer Division and Modulo Operations Saman Amarasinghe, Walter Lee, Ben Greenwald M.I.T. Laboratory for Computer Science Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. g fsaman,walt,beng @lcs.mit.edu http://www.cag.lcs.mit.edu/raw Abstract Integer division, modulo, and remainder operations are expressive and useful operations. They are logical candidates to express complex data accesses such as the wrap-around behavior in queues using ring buffers, array address calculations in data distribution, and cache locality compiler-optimizations. Experienced application programmers, however, avoid them because they are slow. Furthermore, while advances in both hardware and software have improved the performance of many parts of a program, few are applicable to division and modulo operations. This trend makes these operations increasingly detrimental to program performance. This paper describes a suite of optimizations for eliminating division, modulo, and remainder operations from programs. These techniques are analogous to strength reduction techniques used for multiplications. In addition to some algebraic simplifications, we present a set of optimization techniques which eliminates division and modulo operations that are functions of loop induction variables and loop constants. The optimizations rely on number theory, integer programming and loop transformations. 1 Introduction This paper describes a suite of optimizations for eliminating division, modulo, and remainder operations from pro- grams. In addition to some algebraic simplifications, we present a set of optimization techniques which eliminates division and modulo operations that are functions of loop induction variables and loop constants. These techniques are analogous to strength reduction techniques used for multiplications. Integer division, modulo, and remainder are expressive and useful operations.