Sir Joshua Reynolds's Mrs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sir Joshua Reynolds's Mrs SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS’S MRS. NESBITT AS CIRCE (1781): FASHIONING REPUTATIONS By Hannah Southern Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Art History Chair: __________________________________________ ______________ Julietett BBellow,elllolow PPh.D.h D _____________________________________________________________ AndreaAndrea PearsonPearson, PhPh.D.D ___________________________________ Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences ___________________________________April 29, 2020 Date 2020 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 © COPYRIGHT by Hannah Southern 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS’S MRS. NESBITT AS CIRCE (1781): FASHIONING REPUTATIONS BY Hannah Southern ABSTRACT In the spring of 1781, society hostess and former courtesan Mary Nesbitt commissioned Sir Joshua Reynolds to paint her portrait, a work now called Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe (1781). As its current title suggests, the portrait depicts Nesbitt in the guise of Circe, a sorceress and seXual temptress in ancient Greek mythology. However, the painting freely interprets Circe’s story. Nesbitt is surrounded by three animals in the portrait—a domestic cat, a black monkey, and a leopard—none of which feature in the Homeric text or other versions of Circe’s tale. Building on recent scholarship that considers how Georgian portraiture could function as a form of self- fashioning for both the artist and sitter, this thesis examines the unusual iconography of Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe. I offer a series of hypotheses that illuminate this enigmatic image in its context, analyzing its complex relationship to concepts of gendered and national identity in late eighteenth-century Britain. Nesbitt’s choice to depict herself as this sexually alluring mythological character is a clear reference to her own history as a courtesan, a daring move for both her and Reynolds, risking public approbation for celebrating her lack of propriety. Yet the provocative nature of this allusion to Circe is tempered by the menagerie of non-European animals around the sitter. I argue this iconography links Nesbitt to Britain’s imperial and racial exploits of the period, which included colonial expansion in Africa, the rise of the East India Company, and increasing trade throughout the Middle East. Through this oblique reference to ii Britain’s power overseas, Reynolds secured Nesbitt’s white privilege, visually identifying her with the nation’s colonial military and economic power. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support of the American University Art History Department, my family, and friends. I thank my advisor, Dr. Juliet Bellow, for her guidance throughout this process and for her encouragement in finding my scholarly voice. Thank you to Dr. Andrea Pearson and Dr. Joanne Allen for their vital insights and suggestions. I thank Sam Sadow for the wonderful time I spent working in the Visual Resource Center, allowing me to pursue my interests in digital archives. Elizabeth B. gave me wonderful feedback and editing support throughout the writing process, and I wish her academic success as she pursues her MA. I also could not have reached the finish line without the open ears of my friends and cohort. I especially thank Nicole Martin for her friendship these past two years. I thank my father, Michael Southern, for all of his love, support, and inspiration over the years. Prudence, my constant companion, thank you for the late night company when all seemed lost. To Gabe Wisner-Carlson, thank you for your unwavering patience, kindness, and support throughout this journey—you have been my rock even when the world has, almost literally, come to a stop. Finally, I thank my mother, Kathleen Pepi Southern, for her love, curiosity, and discerning eye— this project, quite literally, could not have been possible without you. Thank you for always believing in me. Thank you! iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………….…………………………... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………... iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS………………………………………………….……………….... iv INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….……………….. 1 CHAPTER 1 A COLLABORATIVE ENTERPRISE…………………….…………….. 11 CHAPTER 2 TRANSFORMATIVE CIRCE……………………..……….……………. 22 CHAPTER 3 SELF-FASHIONING AS IMPERIAL……………………….……..……. 31 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………...……….. 47 ILLUSTRATIONS………...………………………………………………………….…….…... 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………………..... 51 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe, 1781. Oil on canvas…………...………….49 Figure 2: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Mrs. Nesbitt with a Dove, 1781. Oil on canvas…...……………...49 Figure 3: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Mrs. Hale as ‘Euphrosyne’, 1762-64. Oil on canvas. …….……...49 Figure 4: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Kitty Fisher as Cleopatra Dissolving the Pearl, 1759. Oil on canvas.……………………………………………………………………...……………..……...49 Figure 5: Sir Joshua Reynolds, The Death of Dido, 1779-81. Oil on canvas….……………...…...49 Figure 6: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Nelly O’Brien, 1763-67. Oil on canvas…………………...……...49 Figure 7: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Sarah Siddons as the Tragic Muse, 1784. Oil on canvas………...49 Figure 8: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Augustus Hervey, 3rd Earl of Bristol, 1762. Oil on canvas.………49 Figure 9: Robert Bowyer Parks, after Sir Joshua Reynolds, Elizabeth Catherine ('Kitty') Clarke (née Hunter), 1763. Mezzotint on paper…………………………………………………..……...49 Figure 10: George Romney, Emma Hart, Lady Hamilton, as Circe, 1782. Oil on canvas…….......49 Figure 11: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Kitty Fisher, 1759. Oil on canvas………………………….........49 Figure 12: Thomas Gainsborough, Ann Ford, 1760. Oil on canvas……………………...…..…...49 Figure 13: John Wallis, The Devonshire Amusement, 1784. Etching on paper…………..…….....49 Figure 14: Sir Joshua Reynolds, George VI as Prince of Wales, 1783. Oil on canvas…..…….......49 Figure 15: George Stubbs, Leopards at Play, 1780. Etching and engraving on paper…...………..49 Figure 16: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Mrs. Baldwin, 1782. Oil on canvas…………………….…..…...49 Figure 17: William Hogarth, A Harlot’s Progress, 1732. Etching and engraving on paper.….......49 Figure 18: Antoine Watteau, The Monkey Sculptor, 1710. Oil on canvas…………….....………..49 Figure 19: Charles Grignion after William Hogarth, Tailpiece to the Catalogue of Pictures Exhibited in Spring Garden, 1761. Etching and engraving on paper……………….…...………..49 Figure 20: Sir Joshua Reynolds, John Manners, Marquess of Granby, 1763-65. Oil on canvas....49 Figure 21: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Lady Elizabeth Keppel, 1761. Oil on canvas…….…...………..49 vi Figure 22: Francois Boucher, La Surprise, 1730. Oil on canvas………………………...………..50 Figure 23: T. Bowen, Out of Fashion. In Fashion, 1772. Etching on paper………...…...………..50 Figure 24: Sir Joshua Reynolds, Portrait of John Campbell, 1st Barron Cawdor, 1778. Oil on canvas…………………………………………………………………………………...………..50 Figure 25: Anonymous, Caricature Showing Marie Antoinette as a Leopard, eighteenth century. Etching.…………………………………….…………………………………………...………..50 Figure 26: George Romney, Lady Hamilton as Circe, 1782. Oil on canvas…..………...………..50 Figure 27: Angelica Kauffmann, Odysseus and Circe (Circe enticing Ulysses), 1786. Oil on canvas. .…………………………………….…………………………………………...………..50 vii INTRODUCTION In the spring of 1781, society hostess and former courtesan Mary Nesbitt (1742/3–1825) commissioned Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792), then President of the Royal Academy, to paint her likeness. Reynolds ultimately produced two portraits: Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe (1781; fig. 1) and Mrs. Nesbitt with a Dove (1781; fig. 2).1 The larger of the two paintings and the subject of this study, Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe, hung in a prominent space in Nesbitt’s home where she held political salons visited by high-ranking members of the British government.2 As its current title suggests, the portrait depicts Nesbitt in the guise of Circe, a sorceress and sexual temptress in ancient Greek mythology, chiefly Homer’s The Odyssey. The iconography of Reynolds’s portrait evokes the character Nesbitt plays: a magical golden cup used to drug Circe’s victims sits next to Nesbitt’s limp left hand, and the white, toga-like drapery of her gown places her in a vaguely 1 David Mannings and Martin Postle, Sir Joshua Reynolds: A Complete Catalogue of His Paintings, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000), 351. The 1781 date attributed to Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe is subject to some debate. Reynolds painted two portraits of Mrs. Nesbitt; some scholars contend that the 1781 sitting only produced the second portrait Mrs. Nesbitt with a Dove 1781. I have concluded through my research that Mrs. Nesbitt as Circe was produced in May 1781, agreeing with the leading Reynolds scholars Martin Postle and David Mannings. The 1884, Catalogue of the Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds, P.R.A., Exhibited at the Grosvenor Gallery and the provenance of the portrait’s current owner, Smith College Museum of Art also concur with this conclusion. The earlier 1764 date is first suggested in the Life and Works of Ozias Humphry, R.A (1918). A letter of the artist relates seeing a Circe painting under production in Reynold’s studio but does not name the model posing as Circe. Thus, raising substantial doubt that Reynolds was painting the then notorious courtesan Mary Davis (later Nesbitt). Nor does Reynolds reference a 1764 Circe in his business letters of that timeframe. Reynolds’s appointment book does include a sitting with a Mrs. Nesbit [sic] in 1769,
Recommended publications
  • The Paintings and Sculpture Given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr
    e. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THE COLLECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART \YASHINGTON The National Gallery will open to the public on March 18, 1941. For the first time, the Mellon Collection, deeded to the Nation in 1937, and the Kress Collection, given in 1939, will be shown. Both collections are devoted exclusively to painting and sculpture. The Mellon Collection covers the principal European schools from about the year 1200 to the early XIX Century, and includes also a number of early American portraits. The Kress Collection exhibits only Italian painting and sculpture and illustrates the complete development of the Italian schools from the early XIII Century in Florence, Siena, and Rome to the last creative moment in Venice at the end of the XVIII Century. V.'hile these two great collections will occupy a large number of galleries, ample space has been left for future development. Mr. Joseph E. Videner has recently announced that the Videner Collection is destined for the National Gallery and it is expected that other gifts will soon be added to the National Collection. Even at the present time, the collections in scope and quality will make the National Gallery one of the richest treasure houses of art in the wor 1 d. The paintings and sculpture given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr. Mellon have been acquired from some of -2- the most famous private collections abroad; the Dreyfus Collection in Paris, the Barberini Collection in Rome, the Benson Collection in London, the Giovanelli Collection in Venice, to mention only a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770S Matthew C
    This article was downloaded by: [McGill University Library] On: 06 May 2015, At: 11:53 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Art Bulletin Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcab20 Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770s Matthew C. Hunter Published online: 03 Mar 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Matthew C. Hunter (2015) Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770s, The Art Bulletin, 97:1, 58-76, DOI: 10.1080/00043079.2014.943125 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2014.943125 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Artists` Picture Rooms in Eighteenth-Century Bath
    ARTISTS' PICTURE ROOMS IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BATH Susan Legouix Sloman In May 1775 David Garrick described to Hannah More the sense of well­ being he experienced in Bath: 'I do this, & do that, & do Nothing, & I go here and go there and go nowhere-Such is ye life of Bath & such the Effects of this place upon me-I forget my Cares, & my large family in London, & Every thing ... '. 1 The visitor to Bath in the second half of the eighteenth century had very few decisions to make once he was safely installed in his lodgings. A well-established pattern of bathing, drinking spa water, worship, concert and theatre-going and balls meant that in the early and later parts of each day he was likely to be fully occupied. However he was free to decide how to spend the daylight hours between around lOam when the company generally left the Pump Room and 3pm when most people retired to their lodgings to dine. Contemporary diaries and journals suggest that favourite daytime pursuits included walking on the parades, carriage excursions, visiting libraries (which were usually also bookshops), milliners, toy shops, jewellers and artists' showrooms and of course, sitting for a portrait. At least 160 artists spent some time working in Bath in the eighteenth century,2 a statistic which indicates that sitting for a portrait was indeed one of the most popular activities. Although he did not specifically have Bath in mind, Thomas Bardwell noted in 1756, 'It is well known, that no Nation in the World delights so much in Face-painting, or gives so generous Encouragement to it as our own'.3 In 1760 the Bath writer Daniel Webb noted 'the extraordinary passion which the English have for portraits'.4 Andre Rouquet in his survey of The Present State of the Arts in England of 1755 described how 'Every portrait painter in England has a room to shew his pictures, separate from that in which he works.
    [Show full text]
  • Lot and His Daughters Pen and Brown Ink and Brown Wash, with Traces of Framing Lines in Brown Ink
    Giovanni Francesco Barbieri GUERCINO (Cento 1591 - Bologna 1666) Lot and his Daughters Pen and brown ink and brown wash, with traces of framing lines in brown ink. Laid down on an 18th century English mount, inscribed Guercino at the bottom. Numbered 544. at the upper right of the mount. 180 x 235 mm. (7 1/8 x 8 7/8 in.) This drawing is a preparatory compositional study for one of the most significant works of Guercino’s early career; the large canvas of Lot and His Daughters painted in 1617 for Cardinal Alessandro Ludovisi, the archbishop of Bologna and later Pope Gregory XV, and today in the monastery of San Lorenzo at El Escorial, near Madrid. This was one of three paintings commissioned from Guercino by Cardinal Ludovisi executed in 1617, the others being a Return of the Prodigal Son and a Susanna and the Elders. The Lot and His Daughters is recorded in inventories of the Villa Ludovisi in Rome in 1623 and 1633, but in 1664 both it and the Susanna and the Elders were presented by Prince Niccolò Ludovisi, nephew of Gregory XV, to King Phillip IV of Spain. The two paintings were placed in the Escorial, where the Lot and His Daughters remains today, while the Susanna and the Elders was transferred in 1814 to the Palacio Real in Madrid and is now in the Prado. Painted when the artist was in his late twenties, the Lot and his Daughters is thought to have been the first of the four Ludovisi pictures to be painted by Guercino.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Rubens and His Legacy' Exhibition in Focus Guide
    Exhibition in Focus This guide is given out free to teachers and full-time students with an exhibition ticket and ID at the Learning Desk and is available to other visitors from the RA Shop at a cost of £5.50 (while stocks last). ‘Rubens I mention in this place, as I think him a remarkable instance of the same An Introduction to the Exhibition mind being seen in all the various parts of the art. […] [T]he facility with which he invented, the richness of his composition, the luxuriant harmony and brilliancy for Teachers and Students of his colouring, so dazzle the eye, that whilst his works continue before us we cannot help thinking that all his deficiencies are fully supplied.’ Sir Joshua Reynolds, Discourse V, 10 December 1772 Introduction Written by Francesca Herrick During his lifetime, the Flemish master Sir Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640) For the Learning Department was the most celebrated artist in Europe and could count the English, French © Royal Academy of Arts and Spanish monarchies among his prestigious patrons. Hailed as ‘the prince of painters and painter of princes’, he was also a skilled diplomat, a highly knowledgeable art collector and a canny businessman. Few artists have managed to make such a powerful impact on both their contemporaries and on successive generations, and this exhibition seeks to demonstrate that his Rubens and His Legacy: Van Dyck to Cézanne continued influence has had much to do with the richness of his repertoire. Its Main Galleries themes of poetry, elegance, power, compassion, violence and lust highlight the 24 January – 10 April 2015 diversity of Rubens’s remarkable range and also reflect the main topics that have fired the imagination of his successors over the past four centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connoisseur (Sir Gerald Ryan
    1 TheConnoisseur An Illustrated Magazine For Collectors Edited by C. Reginald Grundy Vol. LIX. (JANUARY—APRIL. 1921) LONDON Published by the Proprietor, W. CLAUDE JOHNSON, at tiii., Editorial and Advertisement Okkices of The Connoisskuu, AT I, Duke Street, St. James's, S.W. i 192 1 MROSE AND SONS 1 DERIIY AND I.ONDO 8(i 1)656 NDEX ARTICLES AND NOTES A Beautiful Jacobean Hanging (Note) .Authors and Contributors—coiilinucd. "A Citv Banquet," by Fred Roc, K.I., R.B.C. Richardson, Mrs. Herbert. The Fashion Plates '(Note) of Horace Vernet (Art.) ... ... ... yy Adam and other Furniture (Note) ... Roberts, C. Clifton. Salopian China (Art.) ... 2.( Aitken, John E., Drawings by (Note) Roe. F. Gordon. The Life and Work of F. W. An Outpost of London, by Criticus (Note) Hayes, A.R.C.A., F.R.G.S. (Art.) 103 Angelica Kautfmann and Her .Art. by Lady Victoria Rusconi, Art. Jahn. The Tapestries of Mantua Manners (.\rt.) by Raphael (Art.) 77 Another New Gallery (Note) Williamson, Dr. G. C. Some Notes on the Portraits of Sir Pliilip Sidney (Art) ... Antique Business Extension (Note) 217 Antiques at Waring's (Note) Books Reviewed. Aquatints. Old (Note) A Bookseller's igo Authors and Contributor.s. Catalogue " A Catalogue of Etchings by Augustus John, Andrews, Cyril Bruyn. The Valencia Altar-piece 1901-1914." by Campbell Dodgson ... 5S (Art.) " A Dweller in Mcsnpntamia," by Donald Maxwell 1S7 Brochner, Georg. Old Danish Furniture (.Art.)... " A Hamll.".i. ..I Imlini Art," by E. B. Havell ... 188 Brockwell. Maurice W. Frans Hals Pictures at " Haarlem (Note) A Histiii\ <\ I \ri\,l,iy Things in England," by M.
    [Show full text]
  • John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery and the Promotion of a National Aesthetic
    JOHN BOYDELL'S SHAKESPEARE GALLERY AND THE PROMOTION OF A NATIONAL AESTHETIC ROSEMARIE DIAS TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PHD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Volume I Abstract 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 11 I Creating a Space for English Art 30 II Reynolds, Boydell and Northcote: Negotiating the Ideology 85 of the English Aesthetic. III "The Shakespeare of the Canvas": Fuseli and the 154 Construction of English Artistic Genius IV "Another Hogarth is Known": Robert Smirke's Seven Ages 203 of Man and the Construction of the English School V Pall Mall and Beyond: The Reception and Consumption of 244 Boydell's Shakespeare after 1793 290 Conclusion Bibliography 293 Volume II Illustrations 3 ABSTRACT This thesis offers a new analysis of John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery, an exhibition venture operating in London between 1789 and 1805. It explores a number of trajectories embarked upon by Boydell and his artists in their collective attempt to promote an English aesthetic. It broadly argues that the Shakespeare Gallery offered an antidote to a variety of perceived problems which had emerged at the Royal Academy over the previous twenty years, defining itself against Academic theory and practice. Identifying and examining the cluster of spatial, ideological and aesthetic concerns which characterised the Shakespeare Gallery, my research suggests that the Gallery promoted a vision for a national art form which corresponded to contemporary senses of English cultural and political identity, and takes issue with current art-historical perceptions about the 'failure' of Boydell's scheme. The introduction maps out some of the existing scholarship in this area and exposes the gaps which art historians have previously left in our understanding of the Shakespeare Gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17
    The Michael Marks Charitable Trust Supplement Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17 THE COLLECTION OF the National Portrait Gallery, London, holdings. Most notably, this year, we fulfilled an ambition provides a fascinating insight into and commentary on Brit- held for more than 150 years, to acquire a portrait of the ish art, history and culture. Under the Museums and Galler- Duke of Wellington that does justice to such a national ies Act 1992, the Gallery maintains a collection of portraits hero. Painted for the Duke’s friend and admirer Lady Jersey, of the most significant people in British history, from the Thomas Lawrence’s last portrait of Wellington is a powerful, early Tudor period to the present – from Katharine Parr to yet strikingly intimate, portrait of one of the most iconic and Martin Parr. In practice, this means that works are acquired influential men in British history. according to the identity of the sitter and on the basis that We have benefited from the work of the Arts Council, the person represented should have made – or be making most recently in the allocation of the Lucian Freud archive – a substantial contribution to British history and culture. under the Acceptance in Lieu scheme. The allocation in- Within these essential criteria, the Gallery places great im- cludes an unfinished self-portrait (c.1985) and forty-seven portance on ensuring that its portraits reflect social and cul- sketchbooks, plus other drawings, watercolours and letters; tural diversity and represent a broad range of activities and the last-mentioned are currently the subject of a cataloguing achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Early 19Th Century Landscape
    • Good morning/afternoon/evening, this talk is from 10:00 to 13:00 with a 20 minute break in the middle. I have allowed 5-10 minutes for questions at the end and I will stay behind afterwards in case anyone wants to discuss any of the issues raised. • In the early nineteenth century, painting the British countryside was a new form of art that required artists to discover new symbols and create new conventions. This resulted in a plethora of types of landscape painting including topographic, pastoral, Romantic, picturesque and sublime. This artistic invention of the countryside took place when the land was being re-engineered and new farming practices introduced. These new practices resulted in rural poverty and, in due course, riots. This talk is about how artists, who were looking for ways to represent the land, dealt with or ignored what was going on down on the farm. • Let me begin by taking you back to April 1809… Notes Background • The industrial revolution meant that there was a mass movement from the farm to the town. At the same time there was increasing pressure to grow more food and conditions for rural workers deteriorated. Also, from the turn of the nineteenth century there was a growing call for a radical reform of democracy and poverty. Reform took a long time coming and social pressures grew culminating in riots and the closest the country has come to political revolution. • This talk is about landscape painting during this turbulent period and how the issues crept into their work until representation of social problems became a category of painting in its own right.
    [Show full text]
  • Guy Peppiatt Fine Art British Portrait and Figure
    BRITISH PORTRAIT AND FIGURE DRAWINGS 2020 BRITISH PORTRAIT AND FIGURE DRAWINGS BRITISH PORTRAIT AND FIGURE DRAWINGS 2020 GUY PEPPIATT FINE ART FINE GUY PEPPIATT GUY PEPPIATT FINE ART LTD Riverwide House, 6 Mason’s Yard Duke Street, St James’s, London SW1Y 6BU GUY PEPPIATT FINE ART Guy Peppiatt started his working life at Dulwich Picture Gallery before joining Sotheby’s British Pictures Department in 1993. He soon specialised in early British drawings and watercolours and took over the running of Sotheby’s Topographical sales. Guy left Sotheby’s in 2004 to work as a dealer in early British watercolours and since 2006 he has shared a gallery on the ground floor of 6 Mason’s Yard off Duke St., St. James’s with the Old Master and European Drawings dealer Stephen Ongpin. He advises clients and museums on their collections, buys and sells on their behalf and can provide insurance valuations. He exhibits as part of Master Drawings New York every January as well as London Art Week in July and December. Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 7930 3839 or 07956 968 284 Sarah Hobrough has spent nearly 25 years in the field of British drawings and watercolours. She started her career at Spink and Son in 1995, where she began to develop a specialism in British watercolours of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. In 2002, she helped set up Lowell Libson Ltd, serving as co- director of the gallery. In 2007, Sarah decided to pursue her other passion, gardens and plants, and undertook a post graduate diploma in landscape design.
    [Show full text]
  • Angelica Kauffmann, R.A., Her Life and Her Works
    EX LlBRl THE GETTY PROVENANCE INDEX This edition is limited to lOOO copies for sale in Great Britain and the United States. I ANGELICA KAUFFMANN, R.A. HER LIFE AND HER WORKS BT DR. G. C. WILLIAMSON THE KEATS LETTERS, PAPERS AND OTHER RELICS Reproduced in facsimile from the late Sir Charles Dilke's Bequest to the Corporation of Hampstead. Foreword by Theodore Watts-Dunton and an Intro- duction by H. Buxton Forman. With 8 Portraits of Keats, and 57 Plates in collotype. Limited to 320 copies. Imperial 4to. OZIAS HUMPHRY: HIS LIFE AND WORKS With numerous Illustrations in colour, photogravure and black and white. Demy 410. MURRAY MARKS AND HIS FRIENDS With numerous Illustrations. Demy 8vo. DANIEL GARDNER Painter in Pastel and Gouache. A Brief Account of His Life and Works. With 9 Plates in colour, 6 photogravures, and very numerous reproductions in half-tone. Demy 4to. THE JOHN KEATS MEMORIAL VOLUME By various distinguished writers. Edited by Dr. G. C. Williamson. Illustrated. Crown 410. Dr. G. C. WILLUMSON and LADY VICTORIA MANNERS THE LIFE AND WORK of JOHN ZOFFANY, R.A. With numerous Illustrations in photogravure, colour and black and white. Limited to 500 copies. Demy 4to. THE BODLEY HEAD Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/angelicakauffmanOOmann SELF PORTRAIT OF ANGELICA. From the original painting in the possessio?! of the Duke of Rutland and hanging at Belvoir Castle. The Duke also owns the original sketchfor this portrait. ANGELICA KAUFFMANN, R.A. HER LIFE AND HER WORKS By LADY VICTORIA MANNERS AND Dr. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Stubbs' Ästhetik
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Rott, Herbert W. (Hrsg.): George Stubbs : 1724 - 1806 ; die Schönheit der Tiere ; von der Wissenschaft zur Kunst [Ausstellungskatalog], München 2012, S. 23-41 STUBBS’ÄSTHETIK Ästhetik? Kann es bei einem Künstler, der alsbloßer Pferdemaler lischer oder platonischer Lehre verfügen. Vereinfacht gesagt: Das gilt und die Dinge so genau wiedergibt, wie sie erscheinen, und sich eine Mal destilliert er aus dem breiten Wirklichkeitsangebot einen dabei auch wissenschaftlich absichert, überhaupt sinnvoll sein, von idealen Typus heraus, das andere Mal ist er göttlich inspiriert, schaut Ästhetik zu reden? Haben wir vor seinen Bildern nicht eher den im Geiste die reine Schönheit und bringt sie in seinem Werk zur An­ Eindruck, es handele sich um eine bloße Addition von genau Beob­ wendung. Die eine Schönheit entsteht a posteriori, als Resultat von achtetem, um ein bloßes Nebeneinanderstellen? Was soll da die Erfahrung und Studium, die andere stellt sich a priori beim begeis­ Frage nach der Ästhetik? Kann bloß Dokumentiertes überhaupt terten Künstler ein und entäußert sich im Schaffensrausch. eine Ästhetik haben? Der bloß nachahmende Künstler dagegen verfährt mecha­ Unser Begriff von Ästhetik ist immer noch, ob wir es wollen nisch, uninspiriert und unintellektuell, rein handwerklich. Djs, was oder nicht, klassisch-idealistischer Natur. Bilder sollen komposito­ er vor sich sieht, überträgt er möglichst eins zu eins, ohne Rest, je­ risch ausgewogen sein, aber nicht steif und unbeweglich. Möglichst denfalls nach dieser Vorstellung, ins Bild. Nun hat die klassische sollen sie etwas erzählen, sich entfalten, einen Anfang, einen Höhe­ Theorie nicht nur ein Schönheitsideal propagiert, sondern, vielleicht punkt und Abschluss haben. Bilder sollen ein Zentrum haben, auch noch wichtiger und eng mit dem Idealentwurf verflochten, eine Hie­ in gedanklicher Hinsicht.
    [Show full text]