DOCSLIB.ORG

Instream Flows April 1, 2016 Brackenridge Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instream Flows April 1, 2016 Brackenridge Park Instream Flows April 1, 2016 Brackenridge Park 2 Map 3 SAWS Reuse Water 4 Dos Rios Discharge at Brackenridge Park 10.00 Permit Limit = 10 mg/l 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.04 2.03 2.00 2.10 2.04 2.28 2.03 2.04 2.04 2.00 0.00 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Graph Courtesy of San Antonio Water Systems 5 Erosion Over Sidewalk 6 Bridge Stops Some of the Floating Debris 7 Floating Debris 8 Lower San Antonio River Instream Flows Project Senate Bill 2 .Goal – Conduct Scientific and Engineering Studies to Determine Flow Regimes (both Water Quality , Quantity and Timing) Necessary to Support a Sound Ecological Environment .Established the Instream Flows Program Multi-Agency Team Multi-Discipline Approach Hydrology and Physical Hydraulics Processes Water Biology Quality Connectivity Stakeholder Process .Stakeholders are a critical component of the Texas Instream Flows Program. .Stakeholder meetings held 2008 Integrated Approach Flow Recommendations Flow Recommendations .Subsistence flows .Base flows (dry, average and wet) .High pulse flows .Over bank flow .Seasonal component Lower San Antonio River and Cibolo Creek Instream Flow Study Upcoming Stakeholder Process .We have: • Data • Analysis • Modeling .We need: • You! Please Save the Date Thursday, October 27, 2016 or Friday, October 28, 2016 Location: TBD Time: TBD (one will be an evening and one will be daytime) 18 Environmental Flows .Amount of water that should remain in stream or river for benefit of environment, bay, & estuary while balancing human needs. .House Bill 3 and Senate Bill 3 – manage and preserve water resources of state and protect instream and freshwater inflows. .Developed Environmental Flows Advisory Group and Science Advisory Committee 19 Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, & Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, & San Antonio Bays Basin & Bay Expert Science Team (BBEST) Blanco River @ Wimberley, TX Guadalupe River @ Comfort, TX San Marcos River @ Luling, TX Guadalupe River near Spring Branch, TX Plum Creek near Luling, TX Guadalupe River @ Gonzales, TX Medina River @ Bandera, TX Sandies Creek near Westhoff, TX Medina River @ San Antonio, TX Guadalupe River @ Cuero, TX San Antonio River near Elmendorf, TX Guadalupe River @ Victoria, TX San Antonio River @ Goliad, TX San Antonio River near Falls City, TX Cibolo Creek near Falls City, TX Mission River @ Refugio, TX GSA BBASC Recommendations Qp: 36,700 cfs with Average Frequency 1 per 5 years Regressed Volume is 492,000 Duration Bound is 70 Qp: 24,400 cfs with Average Frequency 1 per 2 years Overbank Regressed Volume is 306,000 Flows Duration Bound is 57 Qp: 14,300 cfs with Average Frequency 1 per year Regressed Volume is 165,000 Duration Bound is 43 Qp: 4,140 cfs with Average Qp: 6,590 cfs with Average Qp: 1,760 cfs with Average Qp: 4,330 cfs with Average Frequency 1 per season Frequency 1 per season Frequency 1 per season Frequency 1 per season Regressed Volume is 48,300 Regressed Volume is 58,400 Regressed Volume is 14,800 Regressed Volume is 41,200 Duration Bound is 29 Duration Bound is 24 Duration Bound is 14 Duration Bound is 23 High Flow Pulses Qp: 1,150 cfs with Average Qp: 3,250 cfs with Average Qp: 950 cfs with Average Qp: 1,410 cfs with Average Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Regressed Volume is 9,640 Regressed Volume is 26,900 Regressed Volume is 7,060 Regressed Volume is 11,400 Duration Bound is 13 Duration Bound is 17 Duration Bound is 10 Duration Bound is 13 791 727 Base Flows 796 591 591 746 (cfs) 400 400 Subsistence 210 210 210 180 Flows (cfs) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 21 Oct Nov Dec Winter Spring Summer Fall TCEQ Environmental Flow Standards Qp: 1,150 cfs with Average Qp: 3,250 cfs with Average Qp: 1,760 cfs with Average Qp: 1,410 cfs with Average High Flow Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Frequency 2 per season Pulses Regressed Volume is 9,640 Regressed Volume is 26,900 Regressed Volume is 14,800 Regressed Volume is 11,400 Duration Bound is 13 Duration Bound is 17 Duration Bound is 14 Duration Bound is 13 Base Flows 796 791 727 746 (cfs) Subsistence 210 210 210 180 Flows (cfs) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Winter Spring Summer Fall 1)Hardy Base flow adjustment. 2)50% Rule between Base and Subsistence. 3)Pulse Exemption Rule. 22 TCEQ Environmental Flow Standards for SARB 23 Mid-Basin Surface Water Project 24 Lower Basin New Appropriation 25 Mid-Basin Project Firm Yield TCEQ Standards 26 Next Steps .TCEQ implementing Environmental Flow Standards on new/amended water rights. .SARA continues to fund and support scientific studies to refine numbers appropriate for instream and environmental flows. .Revisions to standards made in ten years from adoption. (2022) 27 Questions 28.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classified Stream Segments and Assessments Units Covered by Hb 4146
    CLASSIFIED STREAM SEGMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS UNITS COVERED BY HB 4146 SEG ID River Basin Description Met criteria 0216 Red Wichita River Below Lake Kemp Dam 96.43% 0222 Red Salt Fork Red River 95.24% 0224 Red North Fork Red River 90.91% 1250 Brazos South Fork San Gabriel River 93.75% 1251 Brazos North Fork San Gabriel River 93.55% 1257 Brazos Brazos River Below Lake Whitney 90.63% 1415 Colorado Llano River 94.39% 1424 Colorado Middle Concho/South Concho River 95.24% 1427 Colorado Onion Creek 93.43% 1430 Colorado Barton Creek 98.25% 1806 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake 96.37% 1809 Guadalupe Lower Blanco River 95.83% 1811 Guadalupe Comal River 98.90% 1812 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Below Canyon Dam 96.98% 1813 Guadalupe Upper Blanco River 95.45% 1815 Guadalupe Cypress Creek 99.19% 1816 Guadalupe Johnson Creek 97.30% AU ID River Basin Description Met criteria 1817 Guadalupe North Fork Guadalupe River 100.00% 1414_01 Colorado Pedernales River 93.10% 1818 Guadalupe South Fork Guadalupe River 97.30% 1414_03 Colorado Pedernales River 91.38% 1905 San Antonio Medina River Above Medina Lake 100.00% 1416_05 Colorado San Saba River 100.00% 2111 Nueces Upper Sabinal River 100.00% Colorado River Below Lady Bird Lake 2112 Nueces Upper Nueces River 95.96% 1428_03 Colorado (formally Town Lake) 91.67% 2113 Nueces Upper Frio River 100.00% Medina River Below Medina 1903_04 San Antonio Diversion Lake 90.00% 2114 Nueces Hondo Creek 93.48% Medina River Below Medina 2115 Nueces Seco Creek 95.65% 1903_05 San Antonio Diversion Lake 96.84% 2309 Rio Grande Devils River 96.67% 1908_02 San Antonio Upper Cibolo Creek 97.67% 2310 Rio Grande Lower Pecos River 93.88% 2304_10 Rio Grande Rio Grande Below Amistad Reservoir 95.95% 2313 Rio Grande San Felipe Creek 95.45% 2311_01 Rio Grande Upper Pecos River 92.86% A detailed map of covered segments and assessment units can be found on the TCEQ website https://www.tceq.texas.gov/gis/nonpoint-source-project-viewer .
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Las Moras Seco Creek K Er LAVACA MEDINA US HWY 77 Springs Uvalde LEGEND Medina River
    Cedar Creek Reservoir NAVARRO HENDERSON HILL BOSQUE BROWN ERATH 281 RUNNELS COLEMAN Y ANDERSON S HW COMANCHE U MIDLAND GLASSCOCK STERLING COKE Colorado River 3 7 7 HAMILTON LIMESTONE 2 Y 16 Y W FREESTONE US HW W THE HIDDEN HEART OF TEXAS H H S S U Y 87 U Waco Lake Waco McLENNAN San Angelo San Angelo Lake Concho River MILLS O.H. Ivie Reservoir UPTON Colorado River Horseshoe Park at San Felipe Springs. Popular swimming hole providing relief from hot Texas summers. REAGAN CONCHO U S HW Photo courtesy of Gregg Eckhardt. Y 183 Twin Buttes McCULLOCH CORYELL L IRION Reservoir 190 am US HWY LAMPASAS US HWY 87 pasas R FALLS US HWY 377 Belton U S HW TOM GREEN Lake B Y 67 Brady iver razos R iver LEON Temple ROBERTSON Lampasas Stillhouse BELL SAN SABA Hollow Lake Salado MILAM MADISON San Saba River Nava BURNET US HWY 183 US HWY 190 Salado sota River Lake TX HWY 71 TX HWY 29 MASON Buchanan N. San G Springs abriel Couple enjoying the historic mill at Barton Springs in 1902. R Mason Burnet iver Photo courtesy of Center for American History, University of Texas. SCHLEICHER MENARD Y 29 TX HW WILLIAMSON BRAZOS US HWY 83 377 Llano S. S an PECOS Gabriel R US HWY iver Georgetown US HWY 163 Llano River Longhorn Cavern Y 79 Sonora LLANO Inner Space Caverns US HW Eckert James River Bat Cave US HWY 95 Lake Lyndon Lake Caverns B. Johnson Junction Travis CROCKETT of Sonora BURLESON 281 GILLESPIE BLANCO Y KIMBLE W TRAVIS SUTTON H GRIMES TERRELL S U US HWY 290 US HWY 16 US HWY P Austin edernales R Fredericksburg Barton Springs 21 LEE Somerville Lake AUSTIN Pecos
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Warning Toolset for the Medina River in Bandera County, Texas
    Flood Warning Toolset for the Medina River in Bandera County, Texas Overview improve flood response and mitigation. This toolset consists of a continuous streamflow-gage monitoring network, a well- Floods are the most common natural disaster in the United calibrated hydraulic model of the Medina River, and a flood- States (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2019). The inundation mapper application for the study area. A library of Medina River in Bandera County, Texas, is in the Edwards flood-inundation maps tied to the National Weather Service Plateau (fig. 1) (Hill, 1901), where high-intensity rain rates (NWS) river stage forecast capability is included with the and steep terrain frequently contribute to severe flash flooding toolset (National Weather Service, 2019b). capable of causing loss of life and property. For example, the July 5, 2002, flood claimed a total of 12 lives in the central Texas Creation of Flood Warning Toolset area (National Weather Service, 2019a). The estimated peak discharge during this flood at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow-gaging station 08178880 Medina River at Bandera, Hydrologic Data Tex. (hereinafter “Bandera station”), was 159,000 cubic feet per In addition to the existing Bandera streamflow-gaging second (corresponding to a stage or gage height of 38.91 feet), station, two stage-only gaging stations equipped with the causing significant flooding in Bandera near Mud Creek (fig. 2) ability to collect rainfall measurements were installed upstream and farther downstream (fig. 3) (U.S. Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Along the Balcones Escarpment in Central Texas
    FLOODING ALONG THE BALCONES ESCARPMENT, CENTRAL TEXAS S. Christopher Caran Victor R. Baker Bureau of Economic Geology Department of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin University of Arizona Austin. TX 78713 Tucson. AZ 85721 A few days before the rains began to fall. a band of Tonkawa Indians that were camped in the river valley just below old Fort Griffin moved their camp to the top of one of the nearby hills. After the flood, on being asked why they moved to the top of the hill. the chief answered that when the snakes crawl towards the hills, the prairie do1s run towards the hills. and the grasshoppers hop towards the hills. it is time for the Indian to go to the hills. (Oral testimony attributed to an unnamed weather observer in Albany. Texas, following a memorable flood on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in the late 1870's: recounted by Vance. 1934. p. 7.) ABSTRACT subbasins in Central Texas. Intense rainstorms over small watersheds throughoot the region have produced numerous High-magnitude floods occur with greater frequency in examples of discharge in excess of 100.000 cfs. Flooding the Balcones Escarpment area than in any other region of of this magnitude exacts a heavy toll from area residents the United States. Rates of precipitation and discharge per who incur the high cost of flood-control structures on trunk unit drainage area approach world maxima. The intensity streams (fig. 1). but also sustain casualties and damages of rainstorms is compounded by rapid runoff and limited associated with floods on small.
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Texas Floods October 1998
    Austin/San Antonio Weather Forecast Office WEATHER EVENT SUMMARY October 1998 Floods – South Central Texas October 1998 Vehicle rescue from floodwater in San Antonio. Credit: San Antonio Express-News October 1998 Floods – South Central Texas 2 October 1998 Floods – South Central Texas 17-21 OCTOBER 1998 EVENT SUMMARY On the weekend of October 17 to 18, 1998, a pair of hurricanes over the Eastern Pacific and a near stationary cold front led to disastrous flash flooding along the Guadalupe River and over the San Antonio metro area. When heavy rains began on the morning of October 17, mid to high level moisture from the weakened remnants of Hurricane Madeline was crossing the Sierra Madre Occidental into central Texas. Meanwhile, low-level and mid-level moisture on the outer periphery of Hurricane Lester in South of Acapulco was moving across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and up the western coast of the Gulf of Mexico toward south Texas. A cold front was expected to provide the focusing mechanism for the heavy rains, but torrential rains began to develop along the Balcones Escarpment in the early morning hours on Saturday, October 17--well ahead of the cold front. Convection developed into a nearly stationary Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) which impacted communities along the Balcones Escarpment from San Antonio to Austin with almost continuous rainfall for up to 36 hours. By Saturday afternoon, homes along the Guadalupe River from Canyon Lake to Seguin were being washed off their foundations. Over 30 inches of rain was estimated over a small area south of San Marcos in 36- hours.
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5067, 15 P
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board Flood-Inundation Maps for a 23-Mile Reach of the Medina River at Bandera, Texas, 2018 Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5067 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover, West-oriented view of the Medina River looking upstream near State Route 16 in Bandera, Texas, December 2018 (photograph by Frank L. Engel, U.S. Geological Survey). Back cover, Southwest-oriented view of the Bandera water supply tower near the Bandera County Courthouse, Bandera, Texas, December 2018 (photograph by Frank L. Engel, U.S. Geological Survey). Flood-Inundation Maps for a 23-Mile Reach of the Medina River at Bandera, Texas, 2018 By Namjeong Choi and Frank L. Engel Prepared in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5067 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Counties and Major Rivers
    T e x a s C o u n t i e s a n d M a j o r R i v e r s Stratford ^_Perryton ^_ S h e rr m a n O c h ii ll tt rr e e Lipscomb D a ll ll a m Spearman ^_ ^_ L ii p s c o m b Dalhart H a n s ff o rr d ^_ Canadian Dumas H u tt c h ii n s o n ^_ ^_ H a rr tt ll e y ^_Stinnett R o b e rr tt s H e m p h ii ll ll Channing Miami ^_ M o o rr e ^_ Canadian River ^_Pampa Wheeler ^_ O l d h a m C a rr s o n O l d h a m P o tt tt e rr ^_ G rr a y W h e e ll e rr Vega Amarillo Panhandle ^_ ^_ ^_Claude Canyon C o ll ll ii n g s D e a ff S m ii tt h ^_ D o n l e y - w o r t h A rr m s tt rr o n g D ^_o n l e y - w o r t hWellington Hereford R a n d a ll ll Clarendon ^_ ^_ ^_ Memphis Dimmitt Tulia ^_ ^_ B r^_r ii s c o e H a ll ll C h ii ll d rr e s s Farwell P a rr m e rr C a s tt rr o S w ii s h e rr Silverton ^_ ^_ Childress H a rr d e m a n ^_ R ^_ Plainview ed R Quanah Vernon iver Muleshoe ^_ ^_ C o t t l e B a i l e y L a m b F ll o y d M o tt ll e y C o t t l e B a i l e y L a m b H a ll e ^_ ^_ Crowell W ii ll b a rr g e rr Littlefield ^_ ^_ Wichita Falls ^_ Floydada Matador Paducah W ii c h ii tt a^_ F o a rr d Henrietta ^_ ^_ C ll a y Crosbyton D i c k e n s Montague Sherman Paris ¥ H o c k ll e y L u b b o c k ^_ D i c k e n s K ii n g K n o x B a y ll o rr ^_ Gainesville ^_ Clarksville Red Morton Archer City ^_ ^_ T ^_ ^_ Riv ^_ ^_ Dickens Guthrie ^_ ^_ ^_ rMi o n tt a g u e F a n n ii n L a m a rr ^_ er nit C o o k e G rr a y s o n ^_ C o c h rr a n Lubbock C rr o s b y Benjamin Seymour A rr c h e rr y R Bonham R e d R i v e r Levelland iv R
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping-Texas-History-Colonization-To
    INTRODUCTION TO SECOND EDITION The Alamo's Texas Maps for Teachers recognizes that history and geography are inseparable. This project was conceived after listening to teachers voice their concerns that current maps detailing Texas early history were inadequate for their needs. These new maps have been designed by educators for educators. A textual description for each map was written by Dr. Richard B. Winders, Historian & Curator for the Alamo. Dr. Donald S. Frazier, Professor of History at McMurry University in Abilene, Texas, produced the maps. The two educators have worked together on other projects for publishers Houghton Mifflin and Macmillan Reference. Texas Maps for Teachers has several different uses: It is a supplemental reader for teachers unfamiliar with Texas History. The comprehensive overview of important events and themes should be useful to any teacher. Overhead transparencies of the maps it can be produced for use in the classroom by scanning them into a computer and printing them onto commercially available transparency film. Used in combination with the textual descriptions, Texas Maps for Teachers can be used as a mini-textbook for Texas history from 1700 through 1850. The Alamo would like to thank several individuals who contributed their time by reviewing and commenting on this project at various stages. Dr. Ron Tyler, Executive Director of the Texas State Historical Association, offered valuable suggestions that were incorporated into the text and maps. Two teacher in San Antonio's North East Independent School District provided input from their respective grade levels: Barbara Yost, Windcrest Elementary School and Michael Bailey, Omar N. Bradley Middle School.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Surveys
    1-> STREAM SURVEYS OF THE ?// Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers BY ROBERT A. KUEHNE Aquatic Biologist TEXAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION H. D. Dodgen, Executive Secretary Austin, 'Texas 659-1054-1500-L150 SECTION I of this report deals with the survey conducted of the Guadalupe River SECTION II of the report deals with the survey conducted of the San Antonio River Division of Inland Fisheries TEXAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Austin, Texas Marion Toole, Director IF Report Series—No. 1 January 1955 FOREWORD This is the first of a series of surveys on lakes and streams in Texas. These surveys are being conducted by the Division of Inland Fish- eries of the Texas Game and Fish Commission in order to determine the status of the state's fresh waters. The series of surveys was begun in July 1951. The two surveys in- cluded in this report were financed by state funds. More recent sur- veys are being conducted under the provisions of the Dingell-Johnson Federal Aid Program. Under the provisions of this program the Fed- eral Government contributes 75 percent of the overall cost of the project, and the State Game and Fish Commission contributes 25 percent of the total cost. MARION TOOLE Division of Intand Fisheries TEXAS GAME 8C FISH COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is gratefully extended to landowners, depart- mental personnel, and other persons who aided in the progress of the San Antonio and Guadalupe River surveys through their interest and cooperation. Special recognition is due Game Wardens Clarence Beezley, Charles Edmondson, and William Sumbling for their assist- ance, and to the late Henry Hahn, Game Biologist, for descriptive information and various courtesies.
    [Show full text]
  • Recharge to the Edwards Aquifer in the San Antonio Area, Texas, 2003
    Recharge to the Edwards Aquifer in the San Antonio Area, Texas, 2003 The Edwards aquifer is one of the most permeable and productive car- to the Edwards aquifer is part of a continuing program of the U.S. Geologi- bonate aquifers in the United States and is the major source of public water cal Survey in cooperation with the Edwards Aquifer Authority. supply for more than 1 million people in Bexar, Comal, Hays, Medina, and The estimated annual recharge for 2003 is 669,000 acre-feet (table 1). Uvalde Counties. The Edwards aquifer also supplies large quantities of The estimated annual recharge for 1934–2003 ranges from 43,700 acre-feet water to agriculture, business, and industry in the region; the major artesian in 1956 to 2,486,000 acre-feet in 1992. The average and median estimated springs of the Edwards aquifer provide water for recreational activities, annual recharge for 1934–2003 are 689,500 and 559,400 acre-feet, businesses, and downstream users and provide habitat for several threatened respectively. or endangered species. References The Edwards aquifer area includes the associated catchment area of the Puente, Celso, 1978, Method of estimating natural recharge to the Edwards Edwards aquifer and the Edwards aquifer recharge zone (fig. 1). The catch- aquifer in the San Antonio area, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Water- ment area lies in the southern part of the Edwards Plateau and includes the Resources Investigations Report 78–10, 34 p. watersheds of the major streams that recharge the Edwards aquifer. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 2001, Documentation The recharge zone is located on the southern and southeastern margins for the Edwards aquifer recharge zone geospatial data layer: accessed of the Edwards Plateau within the Balcones Escarpment and includes areas September 11, 2003, at URL of Edwards outcrop as well as areas adjacent to and that drain to the out- http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/gis/metadata/edwards_met.html/ crop.
    [Show full text]