FOOD MICROBIOLOGY Module – 35: Application of Hurdle Technology In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY Module – 35: Application of Hurdle Technology In Paper No.: 03 Paper Title: FOOD MICROBIOLOGY Module – 35: Application of hurdle technology in food industry (e-Text and Learn More) Component-I (A) - Personal Details: Role Name Affiliation National Coordinator Professor R.C. Kuhad University of Delhi South Campus New Delhi Subject Coordinator Professor Vijayakhader Former Dean, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad Paper Coordinator Professor A. K. Puniya National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal Content Writer/Author Dr. Pradip Behare Content Reviewer Language Editor (LE) Technical Conversion FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY Component-I (A) - Module Structure: Structure of Module/Syllabus of a module (Define Topic of module and its subtopic) Introduction, Principle of hurdle technology, Hurdle, Basic Aspects of Application of Hurdle Hurdle Technology, Homeostasis, Metabolic exhaustion, Stress Technology in Food Industry reactions, Multitarget preservation, Individual Hurdles, Microbiocidla Hurdles Reduces Microbial Load, Microbiostatic Hurdles (Chemical Hurdles), Microbiostatic Hurdles (physical Hurdles), Hrudles that prevent contamination, Application of hurdle technology in foods. Component-II - Description of Module Description of Module Subject Name Food Technology Paper Name Food Microbiology Module Name Application of Hurdle Technology in Food Industry Module Id FT/FM/35 Pre-requisites Hurdles, Concept, Hurlde technology in dairy and food products Objectives To study about types of hurdles and their application in food industry Keywords Hurdles, dairy foods, salt, sugar, high-pressure, hurdle concept FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table No. Description Table 2.1 Examples of hurdles used to preserve foods Table 3.1 Role of Microbiocidla Hurdles Table 3.2 Role of Microbiostatic hurdles Table 3.3 Role of Microbiostatic Hurdles Table 3.4 Role of Hurdels in Preventing Contamination Table 4.1 Application of Hurdle Technology in Dairy and Food Products FIGURES OF CONTENTS Table No. Description Figure 2.1 Basic concept of bacterial inhibition by hurdles Figure 4.1 Preservation of food by individual and combined hurdles FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY 1. Introduction 2. Principle of hurdle technology 2.1 Hurdle 2.2 Basic Aspects of Hurdle Technology 2.2.1. Homeostasis 2.2.2. Metabolic exhaustion 2.2.3 Stress reactions 2.3 Multitarget preservation 3. Individual Hurdles 3.1 Microbiocidla Hurdles Reduces Microbial Load 3.2. Microbiostatic Hurdles (Chemical Hurdles) 3.3. Microbiostatic Hurdles (physical Hurdles) 3.4. Hrudles that prevent contamination 4. Application of hurdle technology in foods 5. Summary FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY 1. INTRODUCTION The primary objective of traditional and newly developed food preservation processes is the inhibition or inactivation of microorganisms that ultimately helps to improve shelf stability of food. Every food has certain inherent preservation factors such as extent of heat treatment received (F), water activity (aw), low temperature storage (t), redox potential (Eh), pH, etc. which may be termed as hurdles, because microorganisms will have to 'jump' these hurdles in order to grow and spoil the product. The stability of the product depends upon the intensity of hurdles present in it. More the intensity or height of these hurdle, or more the number of these hurdles, more difficult it will be for microorganisms to overcome these hurdles. In conventional preservation method the intensity of one or two of these hurdle is exceptionally increased making it extremely difficult for microorganisms to overcome that hurdle. For example, in sterilization process F-value (i.e. the amount of heat treatment given) is increased to 3 to 15. Or in dehydration the water activity (aw) is decreased to a very low value i.e. 0.85. Such increase or decrease in the intensities of these parameters adversely affects the quality of certain products. Microbial stability and safety, as well as the sensory and nutritional quality of most preserved foods, are based on a combination of several empirically applied preservative factors (hurdles), and more recently on knowingly employed hurdle technology. Deliberate and intelligent application of hurdle technology allows a gentle, efficient preservation of foods, which is advancing worldwide. Many foods can not be preserved by a single hurdle alone without affecting their sensory and nutritional properties. Therefore, hurdle Technology is the combination of selected hurdles, which can keep microbiological hazards and other microorganisms under control, with or without combinations with microbial steps, so as to obtain and retain end product safety or suitability. 2. PRINCIPLE OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY The most important hurdles commonly used in food preservation are temperature (high or low), water activity (aw), acidity (pH), redox potential (Eh), preservatives (nitrite, sorbate, sulfite, etc.), and competitive micro-organisms (e.g., lactic acid bacteria). More than 60 potential hurdles for foods of animal or plant origin, which improve the microbial stability and/or the sensory quality of these products, have been already studied, and the list of possible hurdles for food preservation is by no means complete. At present, physical, non-thermal processes (high hydrostatic pressure, oscillating magnetic fields, pulsed electric fields, light pulses, etc.) receive considerable attention (Non-thermal Processing), since in combination with other conventional hurdles they are of potential use for the microbial stabilization of fresh-like food products, with little degeneration of nutritional and sensory properties. Another group of hurdles, of special interest in industrialized and developing countries at present, would be „natural preservatives‟ (spices and their extracts, lysozyme, chitosan, pectin hydrolysate, etc.). In most countries, these „green preservatives‟ are preferred because they are not synthetic chemicals, but in some developing countries, they are given preference, since FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY spices are readily available and cheaper than imported chemicals. The critical values of many preservative factors for the death, survival, or growth of micro-organisms in foods have been determined in recent decades and are now the basis of food preservation. However, the critical value of a particular parameter changes if additional preservative factors are present in the food. For instance, it is well known that the heat resistance of bacteria increases at low aw and decreases at low pH or in the presence of preservatives, whereas low Eh increases the inhibition of micro-organisms due to reduced aw. The simultaneous effect of different preservative factors (hurdles) could be additive or even synergistic. In food preservation, the combined effect of preservative factors must be taken into account, which is illustrated by the hurdle effect. 2.1 Hurdles Microbial growth is dependent upon many conditions in the organism‟s environment such as ingredients; nutrients, water activity, pH, presence of preservatives, competitive microorganisms, gas atmosphere, redox- potential, storage temperature and time (Table 2.1). Control of these conditions can therefore be used to limit, retard or prevent microbial growth. One major use of hurdles is to prevent or restrict the growth and/or to reduce the concentration of microorganisms, including target pathogens in milk, intermediate and final milk products. Most milk products need the use of hurdles to become safe and suitable and/or to retain such quality. Table 2.1. Examples of hurdles used to preserve foods Type of hurdle Examples Physical hurdles Aseptic packaging, electromagnetic energy (microwave, radio frequency, pulsed magnetic fields, high electric fields), high temperatures (blanching, pasteurization, sterilization, evaporation, extrusion, baking, frying), ionic radiation, low temperature (chilling freezing), modified atmospheres, packaging films (including active packaging, edible coatings), photodynamic inactivation, ultra-high pressures, ultrasonication, ultraviolet radiation Chemical hurdles Carbon dioxide, ethanol, lactic acid, lactoperoxidase, low pH, low redox potential, low water activity, Maillard reaction products, organic acids, oxygen, ozone, phenols, phosphates, salt, smoking, sodium nitrite/nitrate, sodium or potassium sulphite, spices and herbs, surface treatment agents Microbial derived Antibiotics, bacteriocins, competitive flora, protective cultures FOOD APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY IN FOOD INDUSTRY MICROBIOLOGY hurdles 2.2 Basic aspects of hurdle technology The strength or intensity of a hurdle will normally not be sufficient to render the food as safe, but in combination with other hurdles the desired effect can be achieved. Therefore, to ensure the safety and suitability and or to extend the shelf life of milk products, generally more than one hurdle is needed to control microbial content and or growth, to inhibit spoilage and to help prevent food borne diseases. Suitable combinations of hurdles can be devised so that the organisms of concern can be reduced in number and or no longer grow/survive in the product. Such suitable combinations are called “Hurdle Technology”. Many hurdles act by interfering with the homeostasis mechanisms that microorganisms have evolved in order to survive environmental stresses. Maintaining a
Recommended publications
  • Control of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-To-Eat Foods: Guidance for Industry Draft Guidance
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-To-Eat Foods: Guidance for Industry Draft Guidance This guidance is being distributed for comment purposes only. Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that FDA considers your comment on this draft guidance before we begin work on the final version of the guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance within 180 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number FDA–2007–D–0494 listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. For questions regarding this draft document contact the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) at 240-402-1700. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition January 2017 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Background A. Regulatory Framework B. Characteristics of L. monocytogenes C. L. monocytogenes in the Food Processing Environment III. How to Apply This Guidance to Your Operations Based on the Regulatory Framework That Applies to Your Food Establishment IV. Controls on Personnel A. Hands, Gloves and Footwear B. Foamers, Footbaths, and Dry Powdered Sanitizers C. Clothing D. Controls on Personnel Associated with Specific Areas in the Plant E.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Technology in the Tropics and Subtropics / J.C.T
    Dairytechnolog yi nth etropic s and subtropics J.C.T. van den Berg Pudoc Wageningen 1988 J.C.T.va n den Berg graduated as a dairy technologist from Wageningen Agricultural University in 1946,an d then worked for the Royal Netherlands Dairy Federation (FNZ). From 1954t o 1970 he was dairy advisor for milk and milk products at the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Thereafter, he worked for the International Agricultural Centre, Wageningen, on assignments concerning dairy development and dairy technology in many countries inAfrica , Asia and Latin America; heha s lived and worked inCost a Rica, Pakistan and Turkey. From 1982unti l his retire­ ment, he was a guest worker at Wageningen Agricultural University, where he lectured on production, marketing and processing of milk in tropical and subtropical countries. CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Berg, J.C.T. van den Dairy technology in the tropics and subtropics / J.C.T. van den Berg. - Wageningen : PUDOC. - 111. With index, ref. ISBN 90-220-0927-0 bound SISO 633.9 UDC 637.1(213) NUGI 835 Subject headings: dairy technology ; tropics / dairy technology ; subtropics. ISBN 90 220 0927 0 NUGI 835 © Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (Pudoc), Wageningen, the Nether­ lands, 1988. No part of this publication, apart from bibliographic data and brief quotations embodied in critical reviews,ma y bereproduced , re-recorded or published inan y form including print, photo­ copy, microfilm, electronic or electromagnetic record without written permission from the pub­ lisher Pudoc, P.O. Box 4, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands. Printed in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • HURDLE TECHNOLOGIES: MICROBIAL INACTIVATION by PULSED ELECTRIC FIELDS DURING MILK PROCESSING a Thesis Presented to the Faculty O
    HURDLE TECHNOLOGIES: MICROBIAL INACTIVATION BY PULSED ELECTRIC FIELDS DURING MILK PROCESSING A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by OSCAR RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December, 2010 ©Oscar Rodriguez Gonzalez, 2010 ABSTRACT HURDLE TECHNOLOGIES: MICROBIAL INACTIVATION BY PULSED ELECTRIC FIELDS DURING MILK PROCESSING Oscar Rodriguez Gonzalez Advisor: University of Guelph, 2010 Dr. Mansel W. Griffiths The application of non-thermal processes pulsed electric fields (PEF) and cross-flow micro-filtration (CFMF) continuous to be studied with the purpose of controlling microorganisms in milk. Trends suggesting increased adoption include the study of Food Safety Objectives as a safety criterion, the promotion of sustainable processing, and the implementation of hurdle strategies. While the advance of gentle processing is counteracted by the risk of enhanced resistance due to microbial stress response, several techniques can be applied to quantitatively assess its impact. The objective of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of microbial inactivation by PEF and CFMF at various steps of milk processing including shelf-life, its comparison with high temperature short time (HTST) pasteurization, and the quantitative assessment of the cross protection resistance to PEF of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Some differences in mesophilics inactivation were observed in milks (fat contents between 1.1% and 3.1%). Increasing the PEF inlet temperature decreased the treatment time by three or two-fold. The combination of CFMF/PEF yielded similar microbial reductions as CFMF/HTST. Higher inactivation of the coliforms was achieved in homogenized cream (12% fat) compared to non-homogenized.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Hurdle Technology for Food Safety of Food Products of Animal Origin
    ACTA SCIENTIFIC MICROBIOLOGY (ISSN: 2581-3226) Volume 3 Issue 11 November 2020 Review Article Concept of Hurdle Technology for Food Safety of Food Products of Animal Origin Anita Chappalwar1, Vikas Pathak2, Meena Goswami3*, Raghvendra Received: July 10, 2020 Mishra1 and Prashant Singh1 Published: October 30, 2020 1PhD Scholar Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary © All rights are reserved by Meena Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India Goswami., et al. 2Professor and Head, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India 3Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India *Corresponding Author: Meena Goswami, Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India. Abstract Foods obtained by animals like milk and meat products are highly perishable and very prone to different physic-chemical and microbial spoilage. These are nutritionally dense food with higher amount of moisture and other nutrients, hence provide conducive environment for growth of microorganisms. Hurdle technology deliberately combines existing and new preservation techniques to establish a series of preservative factors that can achieve multi-target, mild but reliable preservation effects against microbial spoilage of food.
    [Show full text]
  • High Oxygen As an Additional Factor in Food Preservation Promotor: Prof
    High Oxygen as an additional factor in Food Preservation Promotor: Prof. Dr. ir. F.M. Rombouts Hoogleraar in de Levensmiddelenhygiëne en microbiologie, Wageningen Universiteit Copromotors: Dr. L.G.M. Gorris SEAC, Unilever, Colworth House, Verenigd Koninkrijk Dr. E.J. Smid Groupleader Natural Ingredients, NIZO Food Research, Ede Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Prof. Dr. ir. J. Debevere (Universiteit Gent, België) Prof. Dr. G.J.E. Nychas (Agricultural University of Athens, Griekenland) Prof. Dr. J.T.M. Wouters (Wageningen Universiteit) Dr. J. Hugenholtz (NIZO Food Research, Ede) Athina Amanatidou High Oxygen as an additional factor in Food Preservation Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus, van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 23 oktober des namiddags te half twee in de Aula Amanatidou A.-High Oxygen as an additional factor in Food Preservation-2001 Thesis Wageningen University-With summary in Dutch- pp. 114 ISBN: 90-5808-474-4 To my parents, my brother and to Erik Abstract In this thesis, the efficacy of high oxygen as an additional hurdle for food preservation is studied. At high oxygen conditions and at low temperature, significant impairment of growth and viability of bacterial cells is found to occur as the result of free radical attack. The imposed oxidative stress leads - to an increase of intracellularly generated reactive oxygen species (mainly O2 , H2O2 and HO·), which disturbs the cellular homeostasis due to catabolic imbalance and results in growth inhibition. The so- called “free radical burst” probably is responsible for the induction of a host defence mechanism against the destructive impact of high oxygen.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Food and Food Processing
    2010 INTRODUCTION TO ANDFOOD FOOD PROCESSING – I TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS Vol THE TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS WHO ARE INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT 2006 ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOODS SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE) FDA BHAVAN, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 002 Website: www.fssai.gov.in INDEX TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY OFFICERS Sr Subject Topics Page No No 1 INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO FOOD FOOD – ITS Carbohydrates, Protein, fat, Fibre, Vitamins, Minerals, ME etc. NUTRITIONAL, Effect of food processing on food nutrition. Basics of Food safety TECHNOLOGICAL Food Contaminants (Microbial, Chemical, Physical) AND SAFETY ASPECTS Food Adulteration (Common adulterants, simple tests for detection of adulteration) Food Additives (Classification, functional role, safety issues) Food Packaging & labelling (Packaging types, understanding labelling rules & 2 to 100 Regulations, Nutritional labelling, labelling requirements for pre-packaged food as per CODEX) INTRODUCTION OF FOOD PROCESSING AND TECHNOLOGY F&VP, Milk, Meat, Oil, grain milling, tea-Coffee, Spices & condiments processing. Food processing techniques (Minimal processing Technologies, Photochemical processes, Pulsed electric field, Hurdle Technology) Food Preservation Techniques (Pickling, drying, smoking, curing, caning, bottling, Jellying, modified atmosphere, pasteurization etc.) 2 FOOD SAFETY – A Codex Alimentarius Commission (CODEX) GLOBAL Introduction Standards, codes
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Commercial Protective Cultures for the Control of Listeria
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 7-29-2019 Evaluation of Commercial Protective Cultures for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Raw Milk Cheese Catherine Gensler University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Recommended Citation Gensler, Catherine, "Evaluation of Commercial Protective Cultures for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli in Raw Milk Cheese" (2019). Master's Theses. 1412. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/1412 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluation of Commercial Protective Cultures for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Raw Milk Cheese Catherine Anne Gensler B.S. University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 2016 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science At the University of Connecticut 2019 Copyright by Catherine Anne Gensler 2019 ii APPROVAL PAGE Masters of Science Thesis Evaluation of Commercial Protective Cultures for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Raw Milk Cheese Presented by Catherine Anne Gensler, B.S. Major Advisor __________________________________________________________________ Dr. Dennis D’Amico Associate Advisor _______________________________________________________________ Dr. Mary Anne Amalaradjou Associate Advisor _______________________________________________________________ Dr. Kumar Venkitanarayanan University of Connecticut 2019 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the tireless support of my research advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Hurdle Technology in Food Preservation
    Volume-4, Issue-5, October-2014, ISSN No.: 2250-0758 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Available at: www.ijemr.net Page Number: 204-212 Use of Hurdle Technology in Food Preservation Neeha V. S1 and Subhash B. Kakade2 1,2M.Tech Scholars, Department of Food Engineering and Technology, (SLIET), Longowal, INDIA ABSTRACT vegetables. Discovering a method to save food was vital to In industrialized countries there is a rapidly the expansion and development of mankind as it is today increasing demand from the consumer for fresh-like, [1]. minimally processed food products and in developing Origin of hurdle technology countries, food storable without refrigeration are of special For centuries, combined methods were applied interest, because refrigeration is costly and not continuously empirically in food preservation. For example, available. Hurdle technology is an intelligent mix of hurdles which works synergistically and provides safe, healthy combination treatment includes heat, reduced moisture products of high quality. The present review focuses on content and antimicrobial chemicals deposited from the hurdle technology: different types of hurdles used, how these smoke onto the surface of the food. Some smoked foods hurdles work together (mechanism), its effect on the may also be dipped or soaked in brine or rubbed with salt microorganism and ultimately it explains how it gives a before smoking, to infuse the flesh with salt and thus add a quality food product. A literature search was carried out and further preservative mechanism. In jam and other fruit a total of 11 food products and their effect after the preserves, the combined factors are heat, high solids application of hurdle technology were studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasteurization - Wikipedia Page 1 of 10
    Pasteurization - Wikipedia Page 1 of 10 Pasteurization From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Pasteurization or pasteurisation[1] is a process that kills microbes (mainly bacteria) in food and drink, such as milk, juice, canned food, and others. It was invented by French scientist Louis Pasteur during the nineteenth century. In 1864 Pasteur discovered that heating beer and wine was enough to kill most of the bacteria that caused spoilage, preventing these beverages from turning sour. The process achieves this by eliminating pathogenic microbes and lowering microbial numbers to prolong the quality of the beverage. Today, pasteurisation is used widely Cream pasteurizing and cooling coils at in the dairy industry and other food processing industries to Murgon Butter Factory, 1939 achieve food preservation and food safety.[2] Unlike sterilization, pasteurization is not intended to kill all microorganisms in the food. Instead, it aims to reduce the number of viable pathogens so they are unlikely to cause disease (assuming the pasteurized product is stored as indicated and is consumed before its expiration date). Commercial-scale sterilization of food is not common because it adversely affects the taste and quality of the product. Certain foods, such as dairy products, may be superheated to ensure pathogenic microbes are destroyed.[3] Contents ◾ 1 Pasteurization conditions ◾ 2 Alcoholic beverages ◾ 3Milk ◾ 3.1 History ◾ 3.2 Process ◾ 3.3 Microwave volumetric heating ◾ 3.4 Efficiency ◾ 3.5 Verification ◾ 3.6 Unpasteurized milk ◾ 4 Consumer acceptance
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Non Thermal Processing on the Bioactive Content in Agricultural
    G.J.B.A.H.S.,Vol.3(1):153-167 (January – March,2014) ISSN: 2319 – 5584 IMPACT OF NON-THERMAL PROCESSING ON THE MICROBIAL AND BIOACTIVE CONTENT OF FOODS Hussain SOROUR1; Fumihiko TANAKA2; & Toshitake UCHINO3 1 Chair of Dates Industry & Technology; King Saud University; P. O. Box 2460; Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia. 2 Laboratory of Postharvest Scince, Department of Bioproduction Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-shi, 812-8581, Japan 3 Laboratory of Postharvest Scince, Department of Bioproduction Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-shi, 812-8581, Japan Abstract Over the past few decades, consumers have been increasingly demanding high-quality, minimally processed food. These requests, coupled with the inadequacy of traditional food processing technologies, have been the driving forces behind improvements in existing technologies and for the development of new food preservation technologies, such as high-intensity pulsed electric field, pulsed white light, UV-C light, ozone and ultraviolet irradiation. The majorities of these technologies are locally clean processes and therefore appear to be more environmentally friendly and have less environmental impact than the traditional ones. Non-thermal treatments have the potential to be an alternative to conventional techniques for food production. Several researchers have investigated how intense processing impacts the safety and shelf life of food. In addition, novel applications are under development, such as the improvement of mass transfer processes or the generation of bioactive compounds by using moderate field strengths. However, the impacts of non-thermal processes on the minor constituents of foods, such as bioactive compounds, have not been emphasized.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurdle Technology: an Overview of the Potential Food Applications for Creating Shelf Stable Food Products
    © 2018 JETIR November 2018, Volume 5, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Hurdle technology: An overview of the potential food applications for creating shelf stable food products Priyanka Suthar1, Rajni Saini1 and Satish Kumar1 1Food Technology and Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab- 144411, India. *Corresponding author Satish Kumar Assistant Professor, Food Technology and Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144411, India Abstract In the present context there are so many innovations and developments are going on in the field of food processing and preservation, to reduce the load of chemical preservative in the processed food items and Hurdle technology is one of them. It is developed few years back with a novel concept for the development or production of stable, nutritious, tasty, safe as well as economical foods. This leads to much impressive applicability in the field of food. The hurdle technology has the usability in both developing and industrialized country for produce effective preserved food. As stated, hurdle technology is the combination of more than one technique at the same time with motive to enhance the shelf life of food product. In earlier times, hurdles were used without background knowledge for their operational principles. From past twenty years, the smart application hurdles come in to the picture prevalent because the principle behind preservation like pH, competitive flora, temperature, Eh, aw, etc and their relations were better understood. Recently, behavior of microbes like metabolic exhaustion, homeostasis and stress reactions along with their physiology were taken into consideration as a factor which influences method of preservation techniques with multi-target concept as emerging preservation techniques in food.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Guide for Cheesemakers Published February 15, 2017
    The American Cheese Society’s Best Practices Guide for Cheesemakers Published February 15, 2017 Copyright © 2016, 2017 American Cheese Society First Edition, 2016 Reprinted with revisions, 2017 All figures in this Guide and documents in the Appendix have been reprinted with permission from the copyright holders. Best Practices Guide for Cheesemakers Introduction In 2016, the American Cheese Society (ACS) released its Best Practices Guide for Cheesemakers (Guide). Its completion was a key strategic goal of the Board of Directors, and the central task with which the Regulatory & Academic Committee had been charged. ACS members requested such a resource, and by way of response, this Guide was created to encompass currently accepted best practices for cheesemaking. This second edition of the Guide includes updates based on changing regulations, incorporates direct feedback and clarification from reviewers at the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, and provides more current resources and templates where available. This Guide provides an easy reference for busy cheesemakers—especially small- to mid-size producers—one which can be readily accessed. Regulatory agencies and academics provide information in great detail, but it is often buried within volumes of text. This Guide gleans the key requirements, suggestions, and practices from that vast sea of information, and attempts to condense them into a more easily digestible format written in more accessible language. I hope you will find that the information provided in this Guide is useful and answers some of your key questions. Please keep in mind that this is not a static document. The Guide will continually grow and change based on feedback from members, academics, regulators, and others.
    [Show full text]