DOCSLIB.ORG

This Table Was Generated on 8/25/20. ID # Committee Name Total

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This table was generated on 8/25/20. PAC Table 3a* Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees (Super PACs) January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 Closing ID # Committee Name Total Receipts Total Disbursements Total IEs Made Debts Owed Cash on Hand C00484642 SMP $148,420,899 $62,028,628 $19,728,979 $0 $86,795,442 C00701888 UNITE THE COUNTRY $29,822,749 $20,839,365 $17,519,179 $25,000 $8,983,384 C00637512 AMERICA FIRST ACTION, INC. $46,553,473 $25,793,795 $15,778,871 $215,217 $23,322,526 C00492140 AB PAC $43,560,575 $33,670,922 $15,690,505 $227,574 $10,036,547 C00739110 PERSIST PAC $15,225,465 $15,017,729 $14,784,334 $0 $207,736 C00487470 CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION $32,112,218 $15,476,235 $12,672,910 $0 $17,134,761 C00486845 LCV VICTORY FUND $33,830,436 $15,109,676 $7,045,639 $14,605 $18,911,600 C00646877 PACRONYM $11,500,207 $8,752,182 $6,943,422 $857,349 $2,864,648 C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! $11,127,840 $8,722,462 $5,437,456 $0 $2,627,618 C00725820 THE LINCOLN PROJECT $19,408,755 $8,563,045 $4,765,304 $263,521 $10,845,711 C00504530 CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND $62,304,696 $12,051,948 $4,520,445 $0 $50,843,579 C00737890 CAROLINA BLUE $4,900,273 $4,530,074 $4,518,798 $0 $370,199 C00657866 PROTECT FREEDOM POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,775,319 $5,172,573 $3,755,187 $0 $693,158 C00559906 AMERICAS PAC $5,032,616 $4,310,524 $3,683,951 $0 $847,868 C00564013 ALLIANCE FOR A BETTER MINNESOTA FEDERAL PAC $3,644,907 $3,612,807 $3,545,794 $0 $39,034 C00662221 HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION $6,194,118 $4,169,442 $3,219,559 $0 $2,327,521 C00736751 FAITH AND POWER PAC $2,951,643 $2,935,963 $2,928,290 $0 $15,680 C00738831 KITCHEN TABLE CONVERSATIONS PAC $2,968,505 $2,933,874 $2,710,263 $0 $34,632 C00698126 1820 PAC $4,937,500 $3,333,605 $2,705,689 $0 $1,603,895 C00687103 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP AC $29,643,690 $6,473,570 $2,567,400 $1,754,167 $25,705,484 C00571588 RESTORATION PAC $9,544,000 $3,565,539 $1,816,459 $0 $6,863,715 C00697300 ACT NOW ON CLIMATE $2,150,948 $2,150,948 $1,780,488 $0 $0 C00571703 SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND $102,150,623 $11,018,211 $1,688,461 $0 $97,300,689 C00725317 BETTER FUTURE MI FUND $2,169,401 $1,630,744 $1,535,089 $0 $538,657 C00547349 NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE $30,427,292 $29,106,747 $1,502,179 $0 $2,722,788 C00748756 LET'S TURN COLORADO BLUE $1,515,386 $1,499,382 $1,489,247 $0 $16,004 C00659011 WITH HONOR FUND, INC. $4,469,930 $4,252,032 $1,442,021 $0 $4,776,992 C00733766 FORWARD CALIFORNIA $1,500,000 $1,481,626 $1,379,509 $190 $18,374 C00731794 TEXAS FORWARD $1,261,101 $1,261,101 $1,251,995 $0 $0 C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS $2,386,266 $3,334,122 $1,119,717 $0 $753,628 C00707844 EDF ACTION VOTES $4,570,882 $3,504,776 $956,088 $0 $1,066,107 This table was generated on 8/25/20. Closing ID # Committee Name Total Receipts Total Disbursements Total IEs Made Debts Owed Cash on Hand C00726208 UNITED WE WIN SUPER PAC $1,175,000 $1,114,102 $936,744 $0 $60,898 C00740662 ILLINOIS CONSERVATIVES PAC $911,000 $911,000 $910,100 $0 $0 C00573733 SECURITY IS STRENGTH PAC $1,631,197 $847,043 $798,990 $500 $1,135,466 C00735670 FIX CONGRESS NOW! $923,348 $917,828 $784,768 $0 $5,520 C00731372 VOTE NURSES VALUES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITT $3,550,000 $3,509,512 $759,512 $17,494 $40,488 C00708842 FIGHTING FOR ALABAMA FUND, INC $812,500 $812,500 $680,300 $0 $0 C00540203 DEFENDING MAIN STREET SUPERPAC INC. $2,240,596 $735,588 $539,850 $0 $2,227,613 C00740225 NRDC ACTION VOTES $1,079,081 $569,386 $510,314 $34,700 $509,695 C00722413 FIRED UP PAC $530,800 $529,010 $488,074 $0 $1,791 C00719708 MATH PAC $622,221 $621,366 $476,006 $0 $856 C00469890 PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC $535,900 $610,288 $453,487 $0 $37,022 C00608943 CLEARPATH ACTION FUND, INC. $563,741 $527,995 $440,000 $0 $44,765 C00736637 COMMITTEE TO PROTECT MEDICARE PAC $670,082 $593,130 $420,246 $0 $76,953 C00744813 DEMOCRATIC PROGRESS $492,500 $438,046 $418,838 $0 $54,454 C00530766 WOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC $4,741,903 $920,664 $418,701 $154,493 $3,878,822 C00692129 TEA PARTY PAC $1,634,440 $1,613,714 $416,000 $0 $21,424 C00747725 MILES OF GREATNESS FUND, INC. $547,500 $437,806 $414,117 $200,000 $109,694 C00483693 SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION $1,282,213 $781,824 $406,539 $0 $632,747 C00712539 NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & UNITE HERE $410,000 $402,021 $400,000 $0 $7,979 C00732172 SAVE AMERICA FUND $1,724,519 $1,007,644 $392,342 $0 $716,875 C00668905 AMERICAN PATRIOTS PAC $681,350 $441,674 $391,749 $0 $250,345 C00489856 ESAFUND $375,000 $419,142 $381,285 $0 $11,710 C00681023 U.S. FUTURE FUND $665,000 $541,873 $373,313 $0 $123,127 C00489799 PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES $12,296,385 $8,775,974 $371,899 $46,675 $7,155,095 C00626861 WFP IE COMMITTEE $3,074,044 $1,727,945 $371,604 $34,115 $2,084,072 C00737361 REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FOR OREGON $422,157 $422,157 $342,729 $0 $0 C00568170 PRIORITIES FOR IOWA POLITICAL FUND $350,002 $371,259 $339,410 $0 $34,401 C00736041 PEOPLE FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE O $19,545 $719,931 $333,236 $0 $77,448 C00733352 AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC $356,030 $354,543 $328,041 $0 $1,487 C00724203 SOMOS PAC $1,036,745 $517,697 $326,944 $22,550 $519,048 C00742783 AG TOGETHER PAC $411,000 $336,403 $323,619 $0 $74,597 C00523589 AMERICAN UNITY PAC INC $1,278,477 $1,204,992 $289,248 $47,632 $380,232 C00734624 CITIZENS FOR A UNITED NEW MEXICO $340,050 $336,763 $268,000 $0 $3,287 C00592808 THE COLLECTIVE SUPER PAC $624,310 $293,190 $265,366 $0 $338,325 C00735829 LONE STAR FORWARD $275,510 $275,252 $255,200 $0 $258 This table was generated on 8/25/20. Closing ID # Committee Name Total Receipts Total Disbursements Total IEs Made Debts Owed Cash on Hand C00514125 THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONS COMMITTEE $349,505 $346,262 $254,000 $0 $5,000 C00738674 NARAL FREEDOM FUND $1,100,552 $251,222 $250,000 $0 $849,330 C00656314 AMERICANS FOR POLICE AND TROOPER SAFETY $4,830,827 $4,692,313 $248,000 $0 $315,019 C00722371 ENERGY SECURITY PAC $287,775 $266,515 $233,105 $0 $21,260 C00488494 NEW PROSPERITY FOUNDATION; THE $282,503 $290,961 $227,900 $400 $564 C00488486 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA WORKIN $2,614,384 $2,589,446 $222,448 $130 $144,409 C00693531 FUTURE LEADERS FUND $462,775 $461,320 $220,607 $0 $1,455 C00739565 JERSEY REAL $260,000 $244,370 $212,400 $0 $15,630 C00712497 HUMANITY FORWARD FUND $951,549 $951,549 $211,201 $0 $0 C00522458 TOGETHER WE THRIVE $208,876 $208,926 $208,926 $0 $0 C00524181 SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION $759,445 $706,737 $205,543 $0 $329,331 C00737171 MADE IN AMERICA PAC, INC. $250,000 $247,780 $201,372 $0 $2,220 C00623371 AMERICAN VALUES PAC INC. $254,820 $292,124 $199,672 $15,578 $28,390 C00550566 CIVIC INNOVATION USA INC $350,001 $268,900 $199,607 $0 $148,545 C00592303 OREGON RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY PAC $254,682 $288,098 $189,853 $0 $37,348 C00747071 DESERT LEADERSHIP FUND $200,065 $191,162 $188,642 $0 $8,903 C00681825 LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A SAFER AMERICA PAC $9,653,999 $9,537,499 $173,500 $0 $175,415 C00747931 BLUE TIDE NY-1 LLC $172,250 $168,920 $168,920 $0 $3,330 C00687830 POR NUESTRAS FAMILIAS $25,000 $193,003 $163,276 $0 $7,818 C00746297 FIGHT FOR THE AMERICAN DREAM PAC $196,725 $164,534 $161,674 $0 $32,191 C00492116 COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS INDEPEN $942,257 $740,356 $155,735 $0 $202,368 C00733097 ONETOUGHSHERIFF $160,060 $156,054 $154,443 $0 $4,006 C00701805 AWAKE CAROLINA $170,000 $159,654 $153,718 $0 $10,346 C00488338 AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION INDEPENDENT EX $155,000 $153,529 $153,393 $0 $8,513 C00680983 NO LABELS ACTION, INC. $2,918,532 $2,858,788 $149,546 $0 $169,641 C00499020 FREEDOMWORKS FOR AMERICA $1,227,500 $800,339 $148,537 $0 $572,229 C00531814 ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND $1,849,281 $557,483 $146,945 $0 $4,132,163 C00510701 JOBS OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM POLITICAL ACT $236,697 $241,101 $144,948 $0 $13,695 C00717421 GRIT PAC $282,116 $253,177 $144,277 $0 $28,939 C00748913 STAND WITH US COMMITTEE $143,000 $141,775 $141,775 $0 $1,225 C00688655 EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVE$24,649,054 $5,447,049 $141,700 $0 $19,202,418 C00735571 TEXANS COMING TOGETHER $160,000 $158,667 $138,495 $0 $1,333 C00691949 FIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT ASSOCIATION PAC $2,756,722 $2,706,982 $138,350 $0 $49,740 C00609388 BLACK PAC $3,845,072 $1,685,248 $135,276 $53,654 $2,506,935 C00681015 CIVIC $210,000 $160,843 $132,500 $0 $49,993 This table was generated on 8/25/20.
Recommended publications
  • May 27, 2015 Sent Via Email and U.S. Mail the Honorable Carlos H

    May 27, 2015 Sent Via Email and U.S. Mail the Honorable Carlos H

    May 27, 2015 PARTNERS C. Andrew Waters (CA, DC, NC, OR, TX) Peter A. Kraus (CA, MO, TX, VA) Charles S. Siegel (PA, TX) Sent via email and U.S. mail Troyce G. Wolf (NY, PA, TX) Michael L. Armitage (CA, LA) The Honorable Carlos H. Cascos B. Scott Kruka (PA, TX) Secretary of State Leslie C. MacLean (PA, TX) Paul C. Cook (CA) Executive Division, Office of the Secretary of State Gary M. Paul (CA) P.O. Box 12697 Kyla Gail Cole (PA, TX) Austin, Texas 78711 John S. Janofsky (CA, DC) Michael B. Gurien (CA) Scott L. Frost (CA, GA, IN, KY, TX) [email protected] Loren Jacobson (NY, TX) Jonathan A. George (CA, PA, TX, VA) Kevin M. Loew (CA) Re: Failure to Comply with Voter Registration Obligations at Texas Gibbs C. Henderson (TX) Department of Public Safety Demetrios T. Zacharopoulos (MD) Dimitri N. Nichols (CA) Wm. Paul Lawrence, II (LA, TX, VA, WA) Dear Secretary Cascos, David Bricker (CA, IL) ASSOCIATES We write on behalf of several eligible voters in the State of Texas — Mark Berry, Joy Sparling (IL) Susannah B. Chester-Schindler (LA, TX) De’Andre Carter, Donovan Cooper, Wendy Faems, Richard Gates, Cynthia Hawkins, Andrew Seitz (CA) Benjamin Hernandez, Deidre Miller, Marni Phon, Pedro Rodriguez, and Totysa Louisa O. Kirakosian (CA) Caitlyn Silhan (TX) Watkins — and others similarly situated, to notify you that, based on our investigation, Erin M. Wood (TX) the Texas Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) is not meeting its voter registration Shawna Forbes-King (CA) R. Walker Humphrey, II (CA, SC) obligations under Section 5 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (the Anne N.
  • Groups to Watch

    Groups to Watch

    Groups to watch There is no question that conservative foundations and think tanks will put an increased emphasis on attacking public sector unions and public schools after the Supreme Court makes its decision in the Janus v. AFSCME case. They are already spending hundreds of millions of dollars across the nation to elect anti-labor and anti-public education candidates and to produce so-called "research," television ads and mailings to bash unions. The Koch network alone plans to spend $400 million this year.1 Virtually all of these organizations aren't required to report their donors. These groups try to bill themselves as pro-worker – they are not. They want to privatize our public schools, lower taxes for corporations and the wealthy, block access to health care, cut pensions, suppress voters, gerrymander and weaken the political power of unions. The tentacles of all of these group are already reaching into Minnesota, advocating for vouchers, more charter schools, defined-contribution pensions and the destruction of public employee unions. State Policy N etwork The State Policy Network (SPN) is a web of so-called “think tanks” that push a right-wing agenda in every state across the country, all while reporting little or no lobbying activities. The $80 million empire2 works to rig the system against working families by pushing for privatizing public schools, blocking expanded access to health care, lowering taxes for corporations and the very wealthy and undermining workers’ rights and unions. SPN and many of its affiliates are members of the controversial American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), where corporate lobbyists and special interest group representatives vote as equals with state lawmakers behind closed doors on “model” legislation that in many cases ends up benefiting the corporations’ bottom line.
  • Billionaires Tea Party

    Billionaires Tea Party

    1 THE BILLIONAIRES’ TEA PARTY How Corporate America is Faking a Grassroots Revolution [transcript] Barack Obama: This is our moment. This is our time. To reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth that where we are many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope; and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and those who tell us we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes we can. Man on Stage: They’re listening to us. They are taking us seriously, and the message is: It’s our county, and they can have it when they pry it from our cold dead fingers. They work for me! NARRATOR: Where did it all go wrong for Barack Obama and the democrats? After sweeping to power with a promise of hope and change, a citizens uprising called the tea party movement emerged. Their message was “no” to big government spending, “no” to healthcare and climate change legislation, and “no” to Obama himself. Woman: Obama is a communist. He says that he doesn't believe in the constitution. NARRATOR: Then, two years into Obama’s presidency, tea party endorsed candidates emerged to sweep the republicans to victory in the House of Representatives. Male News Reader: 32% of the candidates that were elected last night across this country are affiliated with the Tea Party movement. Rand Paul: There's a Tea Party tidal wave, and we're sending a message to 'em. Female Reporter: And they see it as a repudiation of the President and his policies.
  • Cady and Americans for Prosperity Amici Brief in SC99185

    Cady and Americans for Prosperity Amici Brief in SC99185

    Electronically Filed - SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI July 08, 2021 03:22 PM SC99185 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI STEPHANIE DOYLE, ET AL., Appellants v. JENNIFER TIDBALL, ET AL., Respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri Honorable Jon E. Beetem _______________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE JEREMY CADY AND AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS This brief is being filed with the consent of all parties. _______________________________________________________________________ MARC H. ELLINGER, #40828 ELLINGER AND ASSOCIATES, LLC 308 East High Street, Suite 300 Jefferson City, MO 65101 Telephone: (573) 750-4100 [email protected] Attorney for Amici Curiae Jeremy Cady and Americans for Prosperity Electronically Filed - SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI July 08, 2021 03:22 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................. 2 Table of Authorities ............................................................................................. 4 Jurisdictional Statement ..................................................................................... 6 Summary of the Argument .................................................................................. 7 Interest of Amici Curiae .................................................................................... 10 Statement of Facts ............................................................................................
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5030

    Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5030

    EESTIMATINGstimating theTHE IMPACTImpact OFof THEthe PRESIDENTIALPresidential CAMPAIGNCampaign ofOF DDONALDonald J. TRUMPTrump ONon HISPANICHispanic REGISTRATIONRegistration and AND VVOTINGoting inIN HHARRISarris COUNTYCounty RICHARDRichard MMURRAY*urray* ANDand JERONIMOJeronimo CCORTINA**ortina** I. INTRODUCTION 4545 n.II. REVIEWINGReviewing HHISPANICispanic PPOPULATIONopulation GGROWTHrowth andAND LAGGINGLagging POLITICALPolitical PPARTICIPATIONarticipation in IN HHARRISarris CCOUNTYounty.............................. 5050 III. PATTERNSPatterns ofOF HISPANICHispanic VOTERVoter REGISTRATIONRegistration AACROSScross HARRISHarris COUNTYCounty INin RECENTRecent YEARSYears .................................................. 5353 IV. NON-PARTISANNon-Partisan EEFFORTSfforts inIN 20162016 TO to INCREASE Increase HISPANICHispanic REGISTRATIONRegistration and ANI) VVOTINGoting inIN HHARRISarris COUNTYCounty......................... 5555 V. CONCLUSION:Conclusion: WILLWill THEthe TRUMPTrump CANDIDACYCandidacy MATTERMatter INin HARRISHarris COUNTY?County? ......................................................................................... 5858 I. INTRODUCTIONIntroduction In June 2014, I1 (Richard(Richard Murray) wrote a report forfor thethe officeoffice of HarrisHarris County Attorney Vince RyanRyan entitledentitled "Increasing“Increasing Hispanic Voter Registra-Registra­ tion andand ParticipationParticipation inin Harris County,County, Texas:Texas: ChangingChanging DemographicsDemographics Suggest anan AlternativeAlternative Approach."Approach.”
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network

    The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network

    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
  • September 2, 2021

    September 2, 2021

    September 2, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy, As our jurisdictions’ Attorneys General, we are responsible for protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our residents. Although our jurisdictions vary in size, geography, and political composition, we are united in our commitment to an effective criminal justice system that safeguards the communities of our states. To that end, a bipartisan coalition of Attorneys General supported the passage of the First Step Act of 2018—landmark legislation that brought common sense improvements to myriad aspects of the criminal justice system. Central to these reforms was retroactive relief for individuals sentenced under the discredited 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio that Congress abolished in 2010. Following the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Terry v. United States, however, the lowest level crack cocaine offenders remain categorically ineligible for resentencing. We write today to urge Congress to amend the First Step Act, and to clarify that its retroactive relief applies to all individuals sentenced under the prior regime. Congress enacted the historic First Step Act of 2018 to modernize the criminal justice system, implementing comprehensive reform in areas such as corrections, criminal charging, community re-entry, and beyond.
  • Threat from the Right Intensifies

    Threat from the Right Intensifies

    THREAT FROM THE RIGHT INTENSIFIES May 2018 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Meeting the Privatization Players ..............................................................................3 Education Privatization Players .....................................................................................................7 Massachusetts Parents United ...................................................................................................11 Creeping Privatization through Takeover Zone Models .............................................................14 Funding the Privatization Movement ..........................................................................................17 Charter Backers Broaden Support to Embrace Personalized Learning ....................................21 National Donors as Longtime Players in Massachusetts ...........................................................25 The Pioneer Institute ....................................................................................................................29 Profits or Professionals? Tech Products Threaten the Future of Teaching ....... 35 Personalized Profits: The Market Potential of Educational Technology Tools ..........................39 State-Funded Personalized Push in Massachusetts: MAPLE and LearnLaunch ....................40 Who’s Behind the MAPLE/LearnLaunch Collaboration? ...........................................................42 Gates
  • VOTING at HOME How Democracy Survives a Pandemic

    VOTING at HOME How Democracy Survives a Pandemic

    VOTING AT HOME How Democracy Survives a Pandemic Unite America Institute March 2020 Introduction Coronavirus hit the United States quickly and harshly. The impact on our economy, institutions, and way of life has been significant and will likely reverberate for years. The virus also presents a real and present danger to our democracy. Voter participation is a bedrock of a representative government, but voters should not be forced to assume a health risk to cast their ballots. As the virus spread in March, voter turnout plummeted as much as 20%.1 Officials in at least seven states delayed primary elections. But delaying the November 2020 general election is not an option. Fortunately, policymakers and election administrators have the time and tools necessary to respond — if they act decisively and expeditiously. The primary solution is the expansion of a tested, non-partisan reform already in place in many states: access to vote at home. Through this system, voters receive a ballot by mail, fill it out, and either mail it back or bring it to a secure drop-off location. Vote at home systems vary by state — including whether voters can request a mail ballot (often called an “absentee ballot”), can permanently opt-in to receiving one, or are automatically sent one. Vote at home systems maintain in-person polling locations for voters who need a replacement ballot, need support, or want to cast a ballot in a traditional booth. Besides providing a low-risk way for voters, especially the elderly and immunocompromised, to participate this November, there are many other benefits to voting by mail.
  • © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang

    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang

    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: W. Lance Bennett, Chair Matthew J. Powers Kirsten A. Foot Adrienne Russell Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication University of Washington Abstract The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: W. Lance Bennett Department of Communication Democracy in America is threatened by an increased level of false information circulating through online media networks. Previous research has found that radical right media such as Fox News and Breitbart are the principal incubators and distributors of online disinformation. In this dissertation, I draw attention to their political mobilizing logic and propose a new theoretical framework to analyze major radical right media in the U.S. Contrasted with the old partisan media literature that regarded radical right media as partisan news organizations, I argue that media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart are better understood as hybrid network organizations. This means that many radical right media can function as partisan journalism producers, disinformation distributors, and in many cases political organizations at the same time. They not only provide partisan news reporting but also engage in a variety of political activities such as spreading disinformation, conducting opposition research, contacting voters, and campaigning and fundraising for politicians. In addition, many radical right media are also capable of forming emerging political organization networks that can mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and pursue tangible political goals at strategic moments in response to the changing political environment.
  • How Labor Unions Finance Their Political Agenda: 2014 Employeerightsact.Com

    How Labor Unions Finance Their Political Agenda: 2014 Employeerightsact.Com

    How Labor Unions Finance Their Political Agenda: 2014 employeerightsact.com Hundreds of special interests, candidates and pro-labor organizations that are aligned with the Democratic Party and support America’s Largest big labor’s agenda received nearly $140 million in funding principally from union member dues. Labor Unions $140,000,000 + $4,529,795 $1,830,986 MAJOR LABOR UNIONS to Left-Wing Special Interests CIVIL RIGHTS DEMOCRATIC PARTY & ALIGNED GROUPS (continued) LEFT-WING MEDIA AFL-CIO 21 Progress The Illinois Coalition for New Americans Central Committee Progressive Democrats of Wisconsin WOMEN VOTE! American Prospect Center for Media and The Nation Institute Auto Workers (UAW) A. Philip Randolph Immigrant and Refugee National Urban League Kitsap Committee for America Workers’ Defense Action Netroots Nation Democracy The Progressive, Inc Five Major Recipients Institute Rights New York Immigration Democracy Progressive Majority Fund Center for American Ed Schultz Broadcasting Uptake Institute Carpenters (CJA) Advancement Project Jewish Labor Committee Coalition Leadership For Jobs and Progressive States Working Families Party of Progress Action Fund Progress Illinois Cloud Tiger Media of Big Labor Money Alliance for Citizenship Labor Coalition for Ohioans for a Voters Bill Leading For Change Network New York Communications Workers American Immigration Community Action of Rights League of Young Voters Project New America Working Families for a Council Latino Policy Forum People First Voting Project Local Experience We Robert F. Kennedy
  • VERTICAL TARGET May 29 2014.Qxp

    VERTICAL TARGET May 29 2014.Qxp

    VOLUME 17, NO. 11 THE TIPRO TAARGETRGET May 29, 2014 Texas Independent 2014 TEXAS PRIMARY RUNOFF RECAP Producers and Following an unusually heated primary election season, voters in Texas have selected final party Royalty Owners nominations for a number of highly contested statewide races. Association After the May 27 runoff election, Ryan Sitton won the Republican party nomination in the race for railroad commissioner, gaining a 15-point lead over rival candidate former state Representative Wayne Christian. A native Texan, Sitton graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in mechanical engineering. During his career, he has led or provided technical expertise on projects at dozens of refineries and chemical plants in such areas as mechanical integrity programs, Risk Based Inspection (RBI), fixed equipment reliability, and inspection/equipment optimization. In 2006, he founded the oil and gas engineering firm Pinnacle AIS, and currently serves as president and chief executive office of the company. Altogether, Sitton holds more than 15 years of experience in the oil, gas and petrochemical industry. “I think the voters really loved the idea of someone who has real expertise serving in office. Being an engineer, being in the industry for 15 years was a real differentiator. I think voters really liked that,” said Sitton in an interview with the Texas Energy Report. “I spent a lot of time doing town halls, going out and meeting voters directly and talking about the technical aspects of what the energy industry does,” he added. “I had a lot of Tea Party support, Tea Party leaders and Tea Party organizations.