DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Collaborative Opportunities on the Willamette National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Collaborative Opportunities on the Willamette National Forest Ecosystem Workforce Program WORKING PAPER NUMBER 37 SPRING 2012 Assessing collaborative opportunities on the Willamette National Forest EMILY JANE DAVIS AND CASSANDRA MOSELEY INSTITUTE FOR A SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT About the authors Emily Jane Davis is a faculty research associate in the Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon. Cassandra Moseley is the director of the Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon. Acknowledgements This study was made possible by funding from the Willamette National Forest (agreement FS #11-CR-11061800-008). We thank Forest Supervisor Meg Mitchell and the Willamette Forest Leadership Team for initiating and helping shape this assessment. We greatly appreciate the time that the national forest staff and community stakeholders took to share their perspectives. Errors remain the authors. Photos by Emily Jane Davis—Ecosystem Workforce Program Map by Brandon Rishel—Ecosystem Workforce Program, adapted from Willamette National Forest Contact information Ecosystem Workforce Program Institute for a Sustainable Environment 5247 University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403-5247 541-346-4545 [email protected] ewp.uoregon.edu An equal-opportunity, affirmative-action institution committed to cultural diversity and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. This publication will be made available in accessible formats upon request. ©2012 University of Oregon DES0612-044bb Executive summary Leaders on the Willamette National Forest (WNF) in • What is the range of internal agency capacity for western Oregon and adjacent communities are in- collaboration? terested in using collaborative approaches to stew- • What opportunities exist to develop collabora- ard public lands and create community benefits. tive capacity? WNF leadership asked the Ecosystem Workforce Program and the University of Oregon to conduct We found that the WNF currently practices some an assessment of collaborative capacity and oppor- collaboration at the project and other smaller scales tunities. This assessment is based on information within specific program areas. It has numerous bi- gathered between May 2011 and February 2012. As lateral relationships with a diverse array of stake- such, it is a “snapshot” of collaborative activity and holders. However, there has been no larger-scale, capacity at that time, and may not fully capture the integrated collaboration, particularly to bridge the dynamic, evolving nature of what is happening on diverse rural and urban stakeholder needs on the the WNF. We focused on the following questions: WNF. Given the diversity and size of the WNF, “landscape-scale restoration” across large geo - • Who are the key stakeholder and community graphic areas as practiced on some drier east-side leaders in the communities surrounding the For- national forests may not necessarily be appropriate est? What are their main interests and expecta- at this time. tions? 2 Assessing collaborative opportunities on the Willamette National Forest Key stakeholder communities, interests, and Internal agency capacity for collaboration expectations Internal capacity and comfort with collaboration There are many diverse stakeholders across the varies across the WNF. Although some line offi- spectrum of rural and urban communities on the cers and staff are enthusiastic about collabora - WNF. Members of these communities often have tion, others are uncertain about its implications divergent or opposing desires for public forest man- for their work. Some have expressed concern over agement and are disconnected from each other. the startup time and energy commitment to initiate However, there may be common ground around collaboration. Other challenges include a lack of issues such as dispersed recreation, water quality, familiarity with “organizing” steps such as iden- and public access. Tribes have an established con- tifying interested leaders or following up and sus- sultative government-to-government relationship taining engagement after meetings. Some staff may with the WNF, but they desire more consistent com- have a hard time knowing when the Forest is not munication and opportunities to work together. allowed to lead and stakeholders have to initiate and drive collaboration. Staff may also be uncom- In rural communities in particular, the WNF has fortable sharing decision space with external enti- had difficulty finding and consistently engaging ties or fear that collaboration requires abdicating middle ground leaders. Stakeholders from envi- decision-making authority. ronmental groups and the timber industry often receive the majority of attention from the Forest, Opportunities to increase collaborative capacity while local leaders only participate if they per - The WNF and its partners may consider increasing ceive a problem. There is internal agency interest their collaborative capacity by: in building stronger relationships with community and civic leaders, e.g. from educational institutions, • Deliberately building a culture of collaboration local governments, and economic development or- and new capacities in both the staff and stake- ganizations. holders of the WNF • Trying Forest-wide collaborative approaches to In addition, leaders from rural communities see cross-cutting issues the WNF as increasingly disconnected from their • Starting small with locally-appropriate collab- needs. Fewer line officers and staff now live in orative approaches to specific “ripe” projects on these communities, and rapid turnover within the each ranger district, given local contexts (see Ap- agency has created inconsistency in past efforts pendix 1, pages 12–19) to build new relationships. Rural leaders are in- • Maintaining robust communication and adaptive terested in seeing the WNF become more directly learning about collaboration across the Forest engaged in their communities beyond their schools, and in the potential for the Forest to contribute to their local economies beyond recreation. Assessing collaborative opportunities on the Willamette National Forest 3 he Willamette National Forest (WNF) in est? What are their main interests and expecta- western Oregon (Figure 1) currently practic- tions? Tes project-scale collaboration and has robust • What is the range of internal agency capacity for partnerships. However, it has yet to expand collab- collaboration? orative efforts to cover greater ground or multiple • What opportunities exist to develop collaborative interrelated relationships, particularly across its capacity? diverse urban-rural communities. At times, stake- holders feel that the Willamette has not has sought FIGURE 1 sufficient public participation and community in- put on its projects. Willamette National Forest SALEM WNF leaders see collaboration as timely and neces- sary to manage the Forest for integrated, beneficial DETROIT OREGON ecological and socioeconomic outcomes. Collabora- ALBANY DETROIT tive approaches elsewhere in Oregon have helped stakeholders build agreement around forest manage- SWEET HOME ment issues, advanced restoration on public lands, and created opportunities for local contractors and McKENZIE BRIDGE CLOSED IN WINTER forest products businesses. To better understand BLUE RIVER SPRINGFIELD McKENZIE the current context and potential for increasing RIVER EUGENE collaborative capacity, WNF leadership asked the 0 20 LOWELL Ecosystem Workforce Program to conduct a “pre- MIDDLE FORK National forest boundary collaboration assessment.” The objective of this as- OAKRIDGE Ranger district boundary sessment was to address the following questions: Ranger station Interstate highway • Who are the key stakeholder and community Federal highway leaders in the communities surrounding the For- State highway 4 Assessing collaborative opportunities on the Willamette National Forest Approach portunities. There are many organized institutions We conducted twenty-nine interviews with seven- located in urban areas that interface with the For- ty-four community stakeholders and Forest Service est, such as conservation groups. However, many staff from May–August 2011 (see Appendix 2, page of the major forest products companies and forest 20). Given the size and diversity of WNF personnel, contracting businesses are also located in or near it was important to include internal agency per - urban areas, so there is a subset of the urban popu- spectives. We also participated in four field tours lation that is concerned about timber supply and on various forest management issues. After summa- forest-based employment. Rural stakeholders on the rizing our findings, we presented them to the For- Forest live in a range of places from larger incor- est Leadership Team (FLT) in September 2011 and porated to more isolated communities. Some rural received feedback. The FLT used these findings to community members are interested in redevelop- help design a collaborative training for line officers, ing local forestry and forest products infrastruc- staff, and key community leaders in February 2012. ture, while others have moved to the area seeking natural amenities and may not necessarily sup - We then identified ripe opportunities for collabo- port active timber management in their backyards. ration on each ranger district. Rangers and other What matters to both urban and rural stakeholders WNF leaders helped ground-truth and refine these includes water quality and the potential effects of suggestions. In addition, we helped convene small
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study
    US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study DRAFT Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment November 2017 Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study Executive Summary The Willamette River basin is located entirely within the state of Oregon, beginning south of Cottage Grove, and extending approximately 187 miles to the north where the Willamette River flows into the Columbia River. The basin is more than 11,200 square miles, averages 75 miles in width, and encompasses approximately 12 percent of the total area of the state (Figure ES-1). Within the watershed are most of the state’s population (nearly 70 percent), larger cities, and major industries. The basin also contains some of Oregon’s most productive agricultural lands and supports nationally and regionally important fish and wildlife species. Thirteen of Oregon’s thirty-six counties intersect or lie within the boundary of the Willamette River basin. Through a series of Flood Control Acts the U.S. Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to construct, operate, and maintain thirteen major dams1 in the Willamette River basin. Collectively, these dams, reservoirs and associated infrastructure are known as the Willamette Valley Project (WVP). With a combined conservation storage capacity of approximately 1,590,000 acre-feet, the WVP is capable of providing important benefits for flood damage reduction, navigation, hydropower, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, flow augmentation for pollution abatement and improved conditions for fish and wildlife, and recreation. Feasibility Study History The Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study began in 1996 to investigate future Willamette River basin water demand.
    [Show full text]
  • WIN Quarterly: Summer 2020
    WIN Quarterly: Summer 2020 Greetings, friends and colleagues, I hope you all had a relaxing weekend. It sure felt a little different, this year! The relative calm of the holiday gave me a chance to think about what Independence Day means to me, how that may differ from others and a chance to finish working through my thoughts about Juneteenth. We just declared Juneteenth a holiday at CPRCD and, considering current events, it felt weird to take a day off for the holiday. Ultimately, I did what many privileged white folk do and I donated some money to a charity and went about my day (HBCU Foundation). I instantly felt guilty and knew I needed to do better, so I'm working on that. When congress passed the Lee Resolution on July 2nd, 1776 I would bet that few foresaw another seven years of war with the British. Similarly, I can only imagine that people of color in the United States did not anticipate their fight to continue for another 155 years after Major General Gordon Granger read General Order No. 3 in Galveston on June 19th, 1865. For my whole life, I've celebrated an independence from a "tyranny" I never experienced. What I've really celebrated was my privilege. In fact, I would've been on the other side as my great grandfathers and great uncles were generals for the British Army; one of the former leading numerous decimations of the Americans during the Revolutionary War until being crushed at Yorktown; one of the latter leading the British to victory at the Battle of Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011
    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Submitted by The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Title: Monitoring Wolverine in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Authors: Audrey J. Magoun, Patrick Valkenburg, Clinton D. Long, and Judy K. Long Funding and Logistical Support: Dale Pedersen James Short Marsha O’Dell National Park Service Norcross Wildlife Foundation Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Seattle Foundation The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. U.S. Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Special thanks to all those individuals who provided observations of wolverines in the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We also thank Tim Hiller, Mark Penninger, and Glenn McDonald for their assistance in the field work. This document should be cited as: Magoun, A. J., P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2011. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon – 2011. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho, USA. 2 INTRODUCTION The Oregon Conservation Strategy lists “species data gaps” and “research and monitoring needs” for some species where basic information on occurrence and habitat associations are not known (ODFW 2006; pages 367-368). For the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and West Cascades Ecoregions of Oregon, the Strategy lists wolverine as a species for which status is unknown but habitat may be suitable to support wolverines. ODFW lists the wolverine as Threatened in Oregon and the USFWS has recently placed the species on the candidate list under the federal Endangered Species Act. Wolverine range in the contiguous United States had contracted substantially by the mid-1900s, probably because of high levels of human-caused mortality and very low immigration rates (Aubry et al.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of FREMONT - WINEMA Agriculture NATIONAL FORESTS Forest Service Fremont-Winema National Forests Monitoring and August 2010 Evaluation Report
    United States Department of FREMONT - WINEMA Agriculture NATIONAL FORESTS Forest Service Fremont-Winema National Forests Monitoring and August 2010 Evaluation Report Fiscal Year 2008 KEY FINDINGS Ecological Restoration: In 2008, the Fremont-Winema National Forests embarked on a 10-year stewardship contract with the Collins Companies’ Fremont Sawmill. This project is aimed at improving environmental conditions in the Lakeview Federal Stewardship Unit, while also supplying material to the sawmill. Under the 10-year stewardship contract, task orders are offered each year to provide forest products in conjunction with restoration service work to reduce fuels and improve watershed conditions. Over the 10 year stewardship contract’s life, at least 3,000 acres per year are projected to be thinned to improve forest health and reduce fuels. The contract is projected to offer at least 10 million board feet of forest products to Fremont Sawmill annually, as well as material for biomass energy. Also on the Forest, two Community Fuels Reduction Projects were completed. The Chiloquin Community Fuels Reduction Project was a 7-year project that reduced hazardous fuels on 1,400 acres within the wild land- urban interface (WUI) around the town of Chiloquin and was the first National Fire Plan project implemented on the Forest. This project was a cooperative effort with the Chiloquin-Agency Lake Rural Fire Protection District, the Klamath Tribes, and community residents. The second project was the Rocky Point Fuels Reduction Project. The Klamath Ranger District, with the assistance of local small business contractors and additional participation by the Bureau of Land Management and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Clatsop by Unknown This Photo Shows a Replica of Fort Clatsop, the Modest Structure in Which the Corps of Discovery Spent the Winter of 1805-1806
    Fort Clatsop By Unknown This photo shows a replica of Fort Clatsop, the modest structure in which the Corps of Discovery spent the winter of 1805-1806. Probably built of fir and spruce logs, the fort measured only fifty feet by fifty feet, not a lot of space for more than thirty people. Nevertheless, it served its purpose well, offering Expedition members shelter from the incessant rains of the coast and giving them security against the Native peoples in the area. Although the Corps named the fort after the local Indians, they did not fully trust either the Clatsop or the related Chinook people, and kept both at arms length throughout their stay on the coast. The time at Fort Clatsop was well spent by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark. The captains caught up on their journal entries and worked on maps of the territory they had traversed since leaving St. Louis in May 1804. Many of the captains’ most important observations about the natural history and Native cultures of the Columbia River region date from this period. Other Expedition members hunted the abundant elk in the area, stood guard over the fort, prepared animal hides, or boiled seawater to make salt, but mostly they bided their time, eagerly anticipating returning east at the first sign of spring. The Corps set off in late March 1806, leaving the fort to Coboway, headman of the Clatsop. In a 1901 letter to writer Eva Emery Dye, a pioneer by the name of Joe Dobbins noted that the remains of Fort Clatsop were still evident in the 1850s, but “not a vestige of the fort was to be seen” when he visited Clatsop Plains in the summer of 1886.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTREACH ANNOUNCEMENT USDA Forest Service Wallowa-Whitman National Forest
    OUTREACH ANNOUNCEMENT USDA Forest Service Wallowa-Whitman National Forest The Wallowa-Whitman National Forest will soon be filling one permanent fulltime GS-0462-8/9 Lead Forestry Technicians with a duty station in Joseph, Oregon. The vacancy announcement for this position is posted on the U.S. Government’s official website for employment opportunities at www.usajobs.gov. This is a single vacancy announcement. Those that wish to be considered for this position must apply to the vacancy announcement by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on April 5, 2021. This position is being advertised DEMO and anyone can apply. Announcement # (21-R6-11071498-DP-LM) https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/596379100 Position: Lead Forestry Technician (Timber Sale Prep) GS-0462-8/9 Location: Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Joseph, Oregon This notification is being circulated to inform prospective and interested applicants of the following potential opportunities: • Permanent, Competitive Assignment • Permanent, Lateral Reassignment (for current GS-9 employees) Questions about this position should be directed to Noah Wachacha (828-736-2876) or ([email protected]). About the Position The position is established on a Forest Service unit where the incumbent serves as a team leader that performs timber sale preparation duties including timber sale unit layout, timber cruising, timber marking, cruise design as well as preparing contracts and appraisals. The incumbent will be responsible for supervising 1 Permanent PSE Forestry Technician and a 1-2 person (1039) marking crew and will ensure completion of all work required prior to offering timber sales for bid. The Forest encompasses 3 Ranger Districts, the Whitman, La Grande and the Wallowa Mountains Office (WMO) and one National Recreation Area all of which have significant workloads.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal
    Vol . 37, No.2 Februory 1975 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES The Ore Bin Published Monthly By STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOlOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Head Office: 1069 Stote Office Bldg., Portland, Oregon - 97201 Telephone, [503) - 229-5580 FIELD OFFICES 2033 First Street 521 N. E. "E" Street Baker 97814 Grants Pass 97526 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscription Rate 1 year - $2.00; 3 years - $5.00 Available back issues - $.25 eoch Second closs postage paid at Portland, Oregon GOVERNI NG BOARD R. W . deWeese, Portland, Chairman Willian E. Miller, Bend H. lyle Van Gordon, Grants Pass STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran GEOlOGISTS IN CHARGE OF FIELD OFFICES Howard C. Brooks, Baker len Ramp, Gronfl Pass Permiuion il gronted to reprint information contained h..... in. Credit given the State of Oregon D~hMnt of Geology and Min.ollndustries for compiling this information will be appreciated. Sio l e of Oregon The ORE BIN DeporlmentofGeology and Minerollndultries Volume 37, No.2 1069 Siole Office Bldg. February 1975 P«tlond Oregon 97201 GEOLOGY OF HUG POINT STATE PARK NORTHERN OREGON COAST Alan R. Niem Deparhnent of Geology, Oregon State University Hug Point State Park is a strikingly scenic beach and recreational area be­ tween Cannon Beach and Arch Cape on the northern coast of Oregon (Fig­ ure 1) . The park is situated just off U.S . Highway 101, 4 miles south of Cannon Beach (Figure 2). It can be reached from Portland via the Sunset Highway (U.S. 26) west toward Seaside, then south. 00 U.S . 101 at Cannon Beach Junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Quicksilver Deposits of Steens Mountain and Pueblo Mountains Southeast Oregon
    Quicksilver Deposits of Steens Mountain and Pueblo Mountains Southeast Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 995-B A CONTRIBUTION TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY QUICKSILVER DEPOSITS OF STEENS MOUNTAIN AND PUEBLO MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEAST OREGON By HOWEL WILLIAMS and ROBERT R. The object of this survey was to examine the quicksilver deposits with the hope of locating large tonnages of low-grade ore. The deposits occur in the south-central part of Harney County and are more than 100 miles from either Burns, Oreg., or Winuemucca, Nev., the nearest towns. The region is sparsely settled by stockmen; Fields, Denio, and Andrews are the only settlements. The range consisting of Steens Mountain and Pueblo Mountains is a dissected fault block, 90 miles long in a north-south direction and as much as 25 miles wide, tilted gently to the west. Pre-Tertiary rnetarnorphic and plutonic rocks occur at the southern end, but most of the block consists of Pliocene volcanic rocks. The major boundary faults on the east side of the range are concealed by alluvium. Minor northwestward-trending faults branch from them, their throws diminish­ ing toward the crest of the range; other minor fractures occur near, and parallel to, the mountain front. The quicksilver lodes were formed in and along these subsidiary fractures. The lodes occur in a more or less continuous belt just west of the eastern front of the range. They are steeply dipping and arranged in subparallel clusters, commonly standing out as resistant siliceous ribs against the softer kaolinized rocks that flank them. The lodes were formed in two hydrothermal stages, the first producing the reeflike masses of chalcedony and quartz with their halos of limonitic and calcitic clays and the second introducing silica and barite along with sulfides of iron, copper, and mercury.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study
    US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study DRAFT Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment November 2017 Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study Executive Summary The Willamette River basin is located entirely within the state of Oregon, beginning south of Cottage Grove, and extending approximately 187 miles to the north where the Willamette River flows into the Columbia River. The basin is more than 11,200 square miles, averages 75 miles in width, and encompasses approximately 12 percent of the total area of the state (Figure ES-1). Within the watershed are most of the state’s population (nearly 70 percent), larger cities, and major industries. The basin also contains some of Oregon’s most productive agricultural lands and supports nationally and regionally important fish and wildlife species. Thirteen of Oregon’s thirty-six counties intersect or lie within the boundary of the Willamette River basin. Through a series of Flood Control Acts the U.S. Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to construct, operate, and maintain thirteen major dams1 in the Willamette River basin. Collectively, these dams, reservoirs and associated infrastructure are known as the Willamette Valley Project (WVP). With a combined conservation storage capacity of approximately 1,590,000 acre-feet, the WVP is capable of providing important benefits for flood damage reduction, navigation, hydropower, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, flow augmentation for pollution abatement and improved conditions for fish and wildlife, and recreation. Feasibility Study History The Willamette Basin Review Feasibility Study began in 1996 to investigate future Willamette River basin water demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Wise 2009
    November LAKE WISE 2009 Editor: Roger Edwards A Voice for Quiet Waters The Oregon Lakes Association Newsletter Some Highlights from the Lincoln City Conference Rotating the site of OLA’s annual conference to different regions of Oregon each year provides attendees the chance to move beyond areas of their normal travels. Wherever the destination happens to be, the meeting produces serious discussions of lake topics, and the opportunity to greet old friends and meet new ones in a low key setting. This expectation was achieved again at Lincoln City last September. We were made to feel very welcome in Lincoln City, on the very first time OLA has met there. The resources we needed were conveniently near-by and handily served our purpose. Holding a lake meeting just steps away from a lake was a real bonus. Some of the vendors were demonstrating their instruments outside of the exhibit hall, where views of Devils Lake diverted attention from the sound of pounding surf from across Hwy 101. Inside, the full agenda of posters and presentations was divided between lake researchers, regulators, and enthusiasts, more-or-less paralleling the makeup of those in attendance. Everyone likely had a different impression of the day’s events, but the Board was universally pleased with this year’s Conference. It attracted well over a dozen new members, who will take our viewpoints to new locations, and who may seek a future position on the OLA Board. Some of these new members have affiliations with Oregon State University and extending our membership network there is a welcome development.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Acres Deeded on Steens
    64347 HARNEY AVE CRANE, OR 97732 160 ACRES ON STEENS MT. NO IMPROVEMENTS TWO CREEKS ON 160 ACRES DEEDED ON PROPERTY STEENS MT. QUAKING ASPENS, MAHOGANY, AND JUNIPERS TREES ACCESS OFF OF NORTH STEENS LOOP ROAD RARE OPPORTUNITY! $480,000.00 SOME TERMS ALL INFORMATION IS FROM SOURCES DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED BY THIS BROKER OR HIS AGENTS. PROSPECTIVE BUYERS SHOULD CHECK ALL INFORMATION TO THEIR OWN SATISFACTION. PROPERTY POSSIBLE IS SUBJECT TO PRIOR SALE, PRICE CHANGE, CORRECTION, OR WITHDRAWAL. LOCATION: This property is located on the unique and beautiful Steens Mountain in the high desert country of eastern Oregon. It is in T33S, R32.75 EWM, all in section 2: SE 1/4 NE 1/4; NE 1/4 SE 1/4; S 1/2 SE 1/4. There is a re-plat adjustment being done, and this property will be in one tax lot. The access is on North Steens Loop Rd, about 15 miles east of Frenchglen, OR. From the North Steens Loop Road, turn south on a short stretch of BLM road for about 200 yards and then a deeded easement through a neighboring property. Frenchglen is about 60 miles south of Burns, OR. There is a paved highway to Frenchglen, and the last 15 miles to the turnoff to the property is a gravel road. PROPERTY: 160 acres of prime Steens Mountain property located just about 1 1/2 miles west of Fish Lake. This land includes ridges and two drainages. One is Lake Creek, which runs out of Fish Lake, and the other is Fish Creek.
    [Show full text]