Incomplete First Prebasic Molt in the Wrentit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Incomplete First Prebasic Molt in the Wrentit NOTES INCOMPIE FIRST P!C MOLT IN THE WRENTff MAUREEN E. FLANNERY and THOMAS GARDALI, Point ReyesBird Observatory, 4990 ShorelineHighway, Stinson Beach, California 94970 Flight-feathermolt in most passerinesbegins with the innermostprimary and proceedsdistally, while the replacementof secondariesbegins at the outermost featherand proceeds proximally (Ginn and Melville 1983, Pyle1997a, 1998). During their first year, most passerinesdo not replaceany flight feathers(i.e., the molt is partial),while a few replacesome (i.e., the molt is incomplete)or all remiges(i.e., the molt is complete)(Jenni and Winkler 1994, Pyle 1997a). In a few species,incomplete first-year molts follow different patterns, which involve a sequenceof replacementsimilar to that foundduring complete molts but beginat differentpoints along the wing (Jenniand Winkler 1994). Such incompleteremex molt, termed "eccentric,"has been documentedfor some North Americanpasse- rines,including the LoggerheadShrike (Lanius ludovicianu$),Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria viren$),and certain tyrant flycatchers (Miller 1928, Phillips1974, Thompson and Leu 1994, Pyle 1998). BetweenNovember 1999 and March 2000 PointReyes Bird Observatory(PRBO) biologistsdocumented several examples of incompletemolt of flightfeathers on first- yearWrentits (Chamaea fa$ciata) captured at three mist-nettingsites operated as part of PRBO'slandbird-monitoring program. The studysites were locatedapproximately 28 km northwestof SanFrancisco, within and just outside of the PointReyes National Seashore,Marin County, California.These are the first recordedobservations of incompletefirst prebasic molt in the Wrentit,which was previously considered to have a completefirst prebasic molt (Pyle1997a, b). We examined101 studyskins of Wrentitsat the CaliforniaAcademy of Sciences (CAS) to determinewhether or not the mist-nettedbirds were anomalous.To ensure that molt had been completedand feather wear was minimal, we examinedonly specimenscollected between September and February.We examinedboth wings and notedthe locationof retainedfeathers. The age of the bird, if known,was recorded fromthe tag data.Because of the difficultyof viewingthe closedwings of studyskins, both of us examinedthe sameskins independently to ensureaccurate recording of presenceor absenceof retainedfeathers. On the 23 mist-nettedWrentits, we examinedthe primariesand secondariesof eachwing carefully and noted the locationand symmetry of retainedfeathers between wings. We determinedthe age of each live bird either by the degree of skull pneumatization(Pyle 1997a) or, if the individualhad been bandedpreviously, we referencedPRBO capturedata. The differencein flight-featherage was obviouson livebirds in the hand,retained feathers being noticeably worn andlight brown, newly replacedfeathers fresh and dark brown. Of the 16 first-year(hatched in 1999) Wrentitsexamined, nine (56 %) had retainedsome juvenal flight featherswhile the other 44% had undergonea completefirst prebasicmolt. All of the older birds (hatchedprior to 1999) had undergonea completemolt as expected,with all flight feathershaving been replaced (n: 7). Of the 101 museumspecimens examined, 11 showedincomplete wing molt. The collectorsidentified only three of the 101 studyspecimens to ageand none of the 11 with incompletemolt was aged. The locationsof specimenswith incompletemolt includedMarin, San Mateo, Alameda,Placer, and LosAngeles counties. On both live birdsand studyskins the patternsof replacementvaried. The most commonpattern (10 of 20 birds)was the bird'sreplacing all primariesand retaining onlya few secondaries,usually secondaries 1-3. Anotherpattern seen in threeof 20 Western Birds 31:249-251, 2000 249 NOTES birdsincluded retention of primaries1-2 and secondaries1-4. We observeda few examplesof asymmetricalreplacement, with somefeathers retained on onewing and replacedon the other.This wasnot unexpected,as eccentric sequences of molt were asymmetricalin 60% of casesreported by Jenni and Winkler (1994). In the life historyof a bird,molt is a fundamentalhigh-energy expenditure not fully understoodby biologists.There are numeroustheories that may explain eccentric molt observedin somebirds. One possibleexplanation may be poor environmental conditions.If weatherwere bad and/or foodscarce, an incompletemolt would enable the bird to conserveenergy by replacingonly the most criticalfeathers. In species whosefirst prebasicmolt includessome to all flight feathers,hatching date and its effect on the timing of molt may influencethe extent of feathersrenewed. Birds hatchedlate in the seasonexperience more of a time constrainton molt andthus may molt morequickly after fiedging, finish molting in a shortertime period,and replace fewer feathersthan those hatchedearlier in the season(Jenni and Winkler 1994). Also,in the Wrentit,which spends its entire life in densescrub or chaparral,enduring extensivefeather wear throughcontact with harshvegetation, incomplete molt may be a strategyto molt the minimalnumber of feathersnecessary to protect and preservethe retainedfeathers. Incomplete remex molt is alsoknown in suchdiverse North Americanspecies as the Verdin(Auripart•s fiaviceps), White-eyed Vireo (Vireo griseus),Yellow-breasted Chat, FieldSparrow ($pizella pusilia), and severalspecies of wrens,thrashers, sparrows, and orioles (George 1973, Willoughby1991, Thomp- son and Leu 1994, Pyle 1997b, 1998). Retainedfeathers are a helpfulcriterion used to age passefines in the hand. Most adult North Americanpasserines have a completeprebasic molt (Pyle 1997a), so incompletemolt indicatesa firstwearbird, at leastuntil the first prealternatemolt or secondprebasic molt (Mulvihill1993, Jenni and Winkler 1994, Pyle 1997b). The occurrenceof incompletemolt in the Wrentitmakes it possibleto agesome first-year birds after skull pneumatizationis complete. We caution that over time retained juvenalfeathers may be moredifficult to discernas renewed feathers age and become more worn and faded.We promotefurther study of incompletemolt and encourage museumcurators to considerspread-wing specimens to facilitatefuture studies. We thankDouglas J. Longand the CaliforniaAcademy of Sciencesfor permission to examinestudy specimens. We are gratefulto RyanDiGaudio, Steve N. G. Howell, Diana Humple, and Peter Pylefor commentson the manuscript.We are indebtedto GeoffreyR. Geupelfor his continuedcommitment to the mist-netprogram at the Palomafin FieldStation. We offer additionalgratitude to the manyfield biologists at PRBO for their careful examination of Wrentits. This is contribution 950 of the Point ReyesBird Observatory. LITERATURE CITED George,W. G. 1973. Molt of juvenileWhite-eyed Vireos. Wilson Bull. 85:327-300. Ginn, H. B., and Melville,D. S. 1983. Moult in Birds.Guide 19. Br. TrustOrnithol., Tring, England. Jenni, L., and Winkler, R. 1994. Moult and Ageing of European Passerines. AcademicPress, London. Miller,A. H. 1928. The moltsof the LoggerheadShrike Lanit•s It•doviciant•s.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 30:393-417. Mulvihill,R. S. 1993. Usingwing molt to agepasserines. N. Am. BirdBander I8:1-10. Phillips,A. R. 1974. The firstprebasic molt of the Yellow-breastedChat. WilsonBull. 86:12-15. 25O NOTES Pyle,P. 1997a. IdentificationGuide to NorthAmerican Passerines. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA. Pyle, P. 1997b. Molt limits in North American passerines.N. Am. Bird Bander 22:49-90. Pyle, P. 1998. Eccentricfirst-year molt patternsin certaintyrannid flycatchers. W. Birds 29:29-35. Thompson,C. W., andLeu, M. 1994. Determininghomology of moltsand plumages to addressevolutionary questions: A rejoinderregarding emberizid finches. Condor 96: 769-782. Willoughby,E. J. 1991. Molt of the genus$pizella (Passeriformes,Emberizidae) in relationto ecologicalfactors affecting plumage wear. Proc. W. Found.Vert. Zool. 4:247-286. Accepted 24 November 2000 251 .
Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF # Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis
    NINOGGSXCNNZ \\ Doc > Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma, Sylvia, Parrotbill, Old World warbler, Jerdon's Babbler,... Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma, Sylvia, Parrotbill, Old World warbler, Jerdon's Babbler, Wrentit, Blackcap Filesize: 6.59 MB Reviews Very beneficial to all type of folks. I could comprehended every thing using this created e pdf. I found out this book from my i and dad suggested this book to find out. (Ms. Madaline Nienow) DISCLAIMER | DMCA GPPUH64MHWS0 < eBook \\ Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma, Sylvia, Parrotbill, Old World warbler, Jerdon's Babbler,... SYLVIIDAE: CHRYSOMMA, FULVETTA, PARADOXORNIS, PARISOMA, SYLVIA, PARROTBILL, OLD WORLD WARBLER, JERDON'S BABBLER, WRENTIT, BLACKCAP To download Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma, Sylvia, Parrotbill, Old World warbler, Jerdon's Babbler, Wrentit, Blackcap PDF, please access the hyperlink listed below and save the document or have access to additional information that are have conjunction with SYLVIIDAE: CHRYSOMMA, FULVETTA, PARADOXORNIS, PARISOMA, SYLVIA, PARROTBILL, OLD WORLD WARBLER, JERDON'S BABBLER, WRENTIT, BLACKCAP ebook. Books LLC, Wiki Series, 2016. Paperback. Book Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Publication Year 2016; Not Signed; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book. Read Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma, Sylvia, Parrotbill, Old World warbler, Jerdon's Babbler, Wrentit, Blackcap Online Download PDF Sylviidae: Chrysomma, Fulvetta, Paradoxornis, Parisoma,
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Level Management Indicator Assemblage Report
    Forest Level Management Indicator Assemblage Report Shasta-Trinity National Forest Prepared By: Talitha Derksen Wildlife Biologist 2-22-11 Date Page 1 of 51 Shasta-Trinity NF Forest Level Management Indicator Report – February 22, 2011 1. Introduction This report provides decision makers on the Shasta-Trinity National Forest (the Forest) with a report of management indicator assemblage habitat status and trends at the National Forest scale. This report fulfills the Shasta-Trinity Land and Resource Management Plan monitoring requirements for management indicator assemblages (Forest Plan, USDA 1995), and contributes to fulfilling the National Forest Management Act requirement to provide for a diversity of plant and animal communities on National Forest land (National Forest Management Act of 1976, 16 U.S.C. 1600). This report will be updated every 3 to 5 years. Management indicator assemblages are groups of wildlife associated with vegetative communities or key habitat components, as identified in the Forest Plan (page 3-24). The Forest Plan permits the use of habitat components to represent the assemblages (Forest Plan, page 5- 16), and guidance regarding management indicator assemblages directs Forest Service resource managers to monitor assemblage habitat trends at the National Forest scale (Forest level). The Forest also produces project level reports to analyze the effects of individual projects on habitat of each potentially affected management indicator assemblage, and describes how these effects to habitat may influence Forest level trends. Direction for and Implementation of Forest Scale Monitoring for Management Indicator Assemblages Forest level monitoring direction for the Shasta-Trinity National Forest management indicator assemblages is identified in the Monitoring Action Plan of the Forest Plan (USDA 1995, Chapter 5, Page 5-16).
    [Show full text]
  • Songbird Remix Africa
    Avian Models for 3D Applications Characters and Procedural Maps by Ken Gilliland 1 Songbird ReMix Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds 3 Contents Manual Introduction and Overview 3 Model and Add-on Crest Quick Reference 4 Using Songbird ReMix and Creating a Songbird ReMix Bird 5 Field Guide List of Species 9 Parrots and their Allies Hyacinth Macaw 10 Pigeons and Doves Luzon Bleeding-heart 12 Pink-necked Green Pigeon 14 Vireos Red-eyed Vireo 16 Crows, Jays and Magpies Green Jay 18 Inca or South American Green Jay 20 Formosan Blue Magpie 22 Chickadees, Nuthatches and their Allies American Bushtit 24 Old world Warblers, Thrushes and their Allies Wrentit 26 Waxwings Bohemian Waxwing 28 Larks Horned or Shore Lark 30 Crests Taiwan Firecrest 32 Fairywrens and their Allies Purple-crowned Fairywren 34 Wood Warblers American Redstart 37 Sparrows Song Sparrow 39 Twinspots Pink-throated Twinspot 42 Credits 44 2 Opinions expressed on this booklet are solely that of the author, Ken Gilliland, and may or may not reflect the opinions of the publisher, DAZ 3D. Songbird ReMix Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds 3 Manual & Field Guide Copyrighted 2012 by Ken Gilliland - www.songbirdremix.com Introduction The “Cool ‘n’ Unusual Birds” series features two different selections of birds. There are the “unusual” or “wow” birds such as Luzon Bleeding Heart, the sleek Bohemian Waxwing or the patterned Pink-throated Twinspot. All of these birds were selected for their spectacular appearance. The “Cool” birds refer to birds that have been requested by Songbird ReMix users (such as the Hyacinth Macaw, American Redstart and Red-eyed Vireo) or that are personal favorites of the author (American Bushtit, Wrentit and Song Sparrow).
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction and Colonization of Birds on Habitat Islands
    Extinction and Colonization of Birds on Habitat Islands KEVIN R. CROOKS,*†† ANDREW V. SUAREZ,† DOUGLAS T. BOLGER,‡ AND MICHAEL E. SOULɧ *Department of Biology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A. †Department of Biology, 0116, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A. ‡Environmental Studies Program, HB6182, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A. §The Wildlands Project, P.O. Box 2010, Hotchkiss, CO 81419, U.S.A. Abstract: We used point-count and transect surveys to estimate the distribution and abundance of eight scrub-breeding bird species in 34 habitat fragments and the urban matrix in southern California. We then calculated local extinction and colonization rates by comparing our data with surveys conducted in 1987. We classified factors that influence extinction and colonization rates into two types: (1) extrinsic factors, which are characteristics of the habitat fragments such as area, age, and isolation and (2) intrinsic factors, which are characteristics of the species that inhabit fragments, such as body size and population density. Over the past decade, at least one species went locally extinct in over 50% of the fragments, and local extinc- tions were almost twice as common as colonizations. Fragment size and, to a lesser extent, fragment age were the most important extrinsic factors determining extinction and colonization. Density indices of scrub birds were the most important intrinsic factors determining extinction rates, predicting the number of sites occupied, the probability of local extinction, relative area requirements, and time to local extinction. Extinciones y Colonizaciones de Aves en Hábitats Insulares Resumen: Utilizamos conteos puntuales e inspecciones en transectos para estimar la distribución y abun- dancia de ocho especies de aves con reproducción en maleza, en 34 fragmentos de hábitat y en la matriz ur- bana del sur de California.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species I Have Seen World List
    bird species I have seen U.K tally: 279 US tally: 393 Total world: 1,496 world list 1. Abyssinian ground hornbill 2. Abyssinian longclaw 3. Abyssinian white-eye 4. Acorn woodpecker 5. African black-headed oriole 6. African drongo 7. African fish-eagle 8. African harrier-hawk 9. African hawk-eagle 10. African mourning dove 11. African palm swift 12. African paradise flycatcher 13. African paradise monarch 14. African pied wagtail 15. African rook 16. African white-backed vulture 17. Agami heron 18. Alexandrine parakeet 19. Amazon kingfisher 20. American avocet 21. American bittern 22. American black duck 23. American cliff swallow 24. American coot 25. American crow 26. American dipper 27. American flamingo 28. American golden plover 29. American goldfinch 30. American kestrel 31. American mag 32. American oystercatcher 33. American pipit 34. American pygmy kingfisher 35. American redstart 36. American robin 37. American swallow-tailed kite 38. American tree sparrow 39. American white pelican 40. American wigeon 41. Ancient murrelet 42. Andean avocet 43. Andean condor 44. Andean flamingo 45. Andean gull 46. Andean negrito 47. Andean swift 48. Anhinga 49. Antillean crested hummingbird 50. Antillean euphonia 51. Antillean mango 52. Antillean nighthawk 53. Antillean palm-swift 54. Aplomado falcon 55. Arabian bustard 56. Arcadian flycatcher 57. Arctic redpoll 58. Arctic skua 59. Arctic tern 60. Armenian gull 61. Arrow-headed warbler 62. Ash-throated flycatcher 63. Ashy-headed goose 64. Ashy-headed laughing thrush (endemic) 65. Asian black bulbul 66. Asian openbill 67. Asian palm-swift 68. Asian paradise flycatcher 69. Asian woolly-necked stork 70.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Those Ar- Dana L Moseley Ticles Using Packages Tm and Topicmodels in R to Ex- Graham E Derryberry Tract Common Words and Trends
    ABSTRACT BOOK Listed alphabetically by last name of presenting author Oral Presentations . 2 Lightning Talks . 161 Posters . 166 AOS 2018 Meeting 9-14 April 2018 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Combining citizen science with targeted monitoring we argue how the framework allows for effective large- for Gulf of Mexico tidal marsh birds scale inference and integration of multiple monitoring efforts. Scientists and decision-makers are interested Evan M Adams in a range of outcomes at the regional scale, includ- Mark S Woodrey ing estimates of population size and population trend Scott A Rush to answering questions about how management actions Robert J Cooper or ecological questions influence bird populations. The SDM framework supports these inferences in several In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill affected many ways by: (1) monitoring projects with synergistic ac- marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico; yet, a lack of prior tivities ranging from using approved standardized pro- monitoring data made assessing impacts to these the tocols, flexible data sharing policies, and leveraging population impacts difficult. As a result, the Gulf of multiple project partners; (2) rigorous data collection Mexico Avian Monitoring Network (GoMAMN) was that make it possible to integrate multiple monitoring established, with one of its objectives being to max- projects; and (3) monitoring efforts that cover multiple imize the value of avian monitoring projects across priorities such that projects designed for status assess- the region. However, large scale assessments of these ment can also be useful for learning or describing re- species are often limited, tidal marsh habitat in this re- sponses to management activities.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bird Families World Bird Families Listed by Continental Region and Country
    World Bird Families World Bird Families Listed by Continental Region and Country Family lists for each country are not always comprehensive Reed-Warblers & Allies (8); Cisticolas & Allies (10); Yuhinas, and sometimes omit marginal families that are more easily White-eyes, and Allies (12); Ground Babblers & Allies (5); found elsewhere. Laughingthrushes & Allies (5); Old World Flycatchers (10); • * - can only be seen in one country with our strategy and are Thrushes & Allies (14); Starlings (13); Oxpeckers (3); Sun- therefore a non-negotiable target. birds & Spiderhunters (10); Wagtails & Pipits (13); Buntings • Italicized families most easily found in a particular area. & New World Sparrows (10); Siskins, Crossbills, & Allies (13); • Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of nations in Old World Sparrows (15); Weavers & Allies (6); and Waxbills our suggested itinerary where this family is available. We & Allies (12). only represent this the first time the family is mentioned to avoid redundancy. Uganda is the only country offering Shoebill* and Dapple- • Families are in bold when they are continental endemics. throat & Allies (IOC only)*. It is also one of the best places to see Secretary-bird (2); Cranes AFRICA (5); Hamerkop; Ground-Hornbills; Honeyguides; Hyliotas; Yel- ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– low Flycatchers (IOC only); and Indigobirds. Ghana is the only country offering both Egyptian Plover* and Rockfowl*. Other families available, including continental endemics and other major target families in bold:
    [Show full text]
  • Cactus Wren Survey Report 2015
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2015 Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) Survey Report Cactus Wren carrying food to nestlings. 26 May 2016 Revised 13 November 2017 2015 Cactus Wren Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................... 1 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 2 SURVEY DESIGN ........................................................................................................................... 3 FIELD METHODS ........................................................................................................................... 3 DATA ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 4 CACTUS WREN DETECTIONS ........................................................................................................ 4 DETECTION PROBABILITY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 5 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South San Diego County Coastal Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus Brunneicapillus) Habitat Conservation and Management Plan
    South San Diego County Coastal Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments Robert A. Hamilton Prepared by: The Nature Conservancy In collaboration with San Diego Management and Monitoring Program June 18, 2015 South San Diego County Coastal Cactus Wren Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Table of Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Approach and Planning Area ............................................................................................ 4 1.3 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 4 2 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Cactus Wren Survey Results and Analysis ........................................................................ 7 2.2 Otay River Valley Cactus Wren Population Status.. ..…………………..………………11 2.3 Factors Associated with Coastal Cactus Wren Decline………………………………...11 2.4 Cactus Wren Habitat Condition Summary and Analysis ................................................. 13 2.5 Habitat Connectivity Assessment ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Passerines and Near Passerines (Excluding Hummingbirds and Owls)
    THE NORTH AMERICAN BANDERS' MANUAL FOR BANDING PASSERINES AND NEAR PASSERINES (EXCLUDING HUMMINGBIRDS AND OWLS) A product of the NORTH AMERICAN BANDING COUNCIL PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE APRIL 2001 THE NORTH AMERICAN BANDERS' MANUAL FOR BANDING PASSERINES AND NEAR PASSERINES (EXCLUDING HUMMINGBIRDS AND OWLS) Copyright© 2001 by The North American Banding Council P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, California 94956-1346 U.S.A. http://nabanding.net/nabanding/ All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational purposes permitted. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..........................................1 4.1.1. Skulling ................................7 Acknowledgments .................................1 4.1.2. Molt ..................................10 4.1.3. Feather characteristics: shape and wear ......10 1. Introduction ....................................1 4.1.4. Plumage color ..........................11 2. The Bander's Code of Ethics .......................1 4.1.5. Cloacal protuberances and brood patches .....12 3. Trapping Techniques .............................2 4.1.6. Features of juveniles .....................13 3.1. Ground Traps ...............................3 4.2. Useful Measurements ("Biometrics") ...........14 3.2. Potter Traps ................................3 3.3. House Traps ................................4 Literature Cited ..................................14 3.4. Bal-chatri Traps .............................4 3.5. Helgoland Traps .............................5 Appendix A. The North American Banding Council .....15 3.5.1. Injuries
    [Show full text]