DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish Off Northwest Africa. Nouadhibou, Mauritania from 10 to 15 June 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish Off Northwest Africa. Nouadhibou, Mauritania from 10 to 15 June 2013 FIRF/ R1115 (Bi) FAO Fisheries and Aquac ulture Re port Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture ISSN 2 0 7 0 -6987 Report of the FAO WORKING GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL PELAGIC FISH OFF NORTHWEST AFRICA Nouadhibou, Mauritania, 10 ---15 June 2013 Rapport du GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA FAO SUR L’ÉVALUATION DES PETITS PÉLAGIQUES AU LARGE DE L’AFRIQUE NORD-OCCIDENTALE Nouadhibou, Mauritanie, 10 -1 5 juin 2013 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1115 FAO Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture n o 1115 FIRF/R1115 (Bi) Report of the FAO WORKING GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL PELAGIC FISH OFF NORTHWEST AFRICA Nouadhibou, Mauritania, 10 ---15 June 2013 Ra pport du GROUPE DE TRAVAIL DE LA FAO SUR L’ÉVALUATION DES PETITS PÉLAGIQUES AU LARGE DE L’AFRIQUE NORD-OCCIDENTALE Nouadhibou, Mauritanie, 10 -15 ju in 2013 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ALIMENTATION ET L’AGRICULTURE Rom e, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. Les appellations employées dans ce produit d’information et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture (FAO) aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique ou au stade de développement des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. La mention de sociétés déterminées ou de produits de fabricants, qu’ils soient ou non brevetés, n’entraîne, de la part de la FAO, aucune approbation ou recommandation desdits produits de préférence à d’autres de nature analogue qui ne sont pas cités. Les opinions exprimées dans ce produit d’information sont celles du/des auteur(s) et ne reflètent pas nécessairement les vues ou les politiques de la FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-008972-0 © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. La FAO encourage l’utilisation, la reproduction et la diffusion des informations figurant dans ce produit d’information. Sauf indication contraire, le contenu peut être copié, téléchargé et imprimé aux fins d’étude privée, de recherches ou d’enseignement, ainsi que pour utilisation dans des produits ou services non commerciaux, sous réserve que la FAO soit correctement mentionnée comme source et comme titulaire du droit d’auteur et à condition qu’il ne soit sous-entendu en aucune manière que la FAO approuverait les opinions, produits ou services des utilisateurs. Toute demande relative aux droits de traduction ou d’adaptation, à la revente ou à d’autres droits d’utilisation commerciale doit être présentée au moyen du formulaire en ligne disponible à www.fao.org/contact-us/ licence-request ou adressée par courriel à [email protected]. Les produits d’information de la FAO sont disponibles sur le site web de la FAO (www.fao.org/publications) et peuvent être achetés par courriel adressé à [email protected] iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT A permanent FAO Working Group composed of scientists from the coastal States, and from countries or organizations that play an active role in Northwest African pelagic fisheries, was established in March 2001. The overall objective of the Working Group is to assess the state of the small pelagic resources in Northwest Africa and make recommendations on fisheries management and exploitation options aimed at ensuring optimal and sustainable use of small pelagic fish resources for the benefit of coastal countries. The thirteenth meeting of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off northwest Africa was held in Nouadhibou, Mauritania from 10 to 15 June 2013. Meeting was funded by the countries of the region, and the meeting was organized by FAO and “Institute National des Recherches et de la Pêche” (IMROP), Nouadhibou, Mauritania. Participants were funded through their respective organizations and IMROP supported local meeting costs. Altogether 18 scientists from six countries and FAO participated. The chairman of the Group was Birane Sambe from the Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem Project (CCLME). A first editing of the report was made by the participants of the Working Group. Final technical editing was done by Ana Maria Caramelo and Merete Tandstad. We are grateful to Valérie Schneider and Danielle Rizcallah for their assistance in the final editing of this document. PRÉPARATION DE CE DOCUMENT Un Groupe de travail permanent de la FAO, composé de scientifiques des États côtiers et des pays ou organisations qui jouent un rôle actif dans les pêcheries pélagiques de l'Afrique nord-occidentale, a été créé en mars 2001. L’objectif général du Groupe de travail est d’évaluer les ressources en petits pélagiques de l’Afrique nord-occidentale et de recommander des options de gestion et d’exploitation des pêches visant à assurer une utilisation optimale durable de ces ressources pour le bénéfice des pays côtiers. La treizième réunion du Groupe de travail de la FAO sur l’évaluation des petits pélagiques au large de l’Afrique nord-occidentale s’est tenue à Nouadhibou, Mauritanie du 10 au 15 juin 2013. La réunion a été financée par les pays de la région et elle a été organisée par la FAO en collaboration avec IMROP, Nouadhibou, Mauritanie. Dix-huit chercheurs de six pays et de la FAO y ont participé. Le président était Birane Sambe du Projet du Grand écosystème marin du courant des Canaries (CCLME). Une première édition du rapport a été faite par les participants au Groupe de travail. L'édition technique finale a été faite par Ana Maria Caramelo et Merete Tandstad. Nous remercions Valérie Schneider et Danielle Rizcallah pour l'assistance apportée à l'édition finale de ce document. v FAO. 2015. Report of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off Northwest Africa. Nouadhibou, Mauritania from 10 to 15 June 2013. Rapport du Groupe de travail de la FAO sur l’évaluation des petits pélagiques au large de l’Afrique nord-occidentale. Nouadhibou, Mauritania du 10 à 15 juin 2013. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report/FAO Rapport sur les pêches et l’aquaculture. No. 1115. Rome, Italy/Italie. ABSTRACT The thirteenth meeting of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off northwest Africa was held in Nouadhibou, Mauritania from 10 to 15 June 2013. The Group assessed the status of the small pelagic resources in Northwest Africa and made projections on the development of the status of the stocks and on future effort and catch levels. The advices for the stocks are given in relation to the agreed reference points F0.1, FMSY, B0.1 and BMSY and on the basis of the projections for the next five years. The structure of the report is the same as that of the previous Working Group reports (FAO, 2002– 2012). A separate section is devoted to each of the main groups of species (sardine, sardinella, horse mackerel, chub mackerel, bonga and anchovy). For each of these, standardized information is given on stock identity, fisheries, abundance indices, sampling intensity, biological data, assessment, projections, management recommendations and future research. In the absence of reliable age compositions, the Working Group used dynamic production models for almost all stocks. Most stocks in the area are influenced by abnormal hydrographical conditions in certain years. An index of environmental quality has therefore been introduced in the production models since 2005. The Norwegian research vessel DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN surveyed the subregion from 1995 to 2006, carrying out acoustic surveys during the months of October–December each year. From 2004 to 2006 intercalibrations and parallel surveys were carried out between R/V DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN and the national research vessels AL-AMIR, AL-AWAM and ITAF DEME and in 2007 and 2008 these national research vessels carried out a coordinated regional survey during the months of October–December. It should be noted that during the 2008 survey, The Gambia was not covered. In 2009 to 2012, the coordinated regional survey was conducted without the participation of the Senegalese R/V ITAF DEME. The Senegalese research vessel had no surveys in the region in 2012. Sardine in Zones A+B, for which a reduction of CPUE has been observed since 2009 as well as a reduction in biomass compared to the overall series, is still considered overexploited.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download E-Book
    嘀漀氀⸀ ㈀ ㄀㘀⼀㈀⸀ Table of Contents Editorial 5 CHERRY JAMES – Brexit: What now for Study Mobility between 7 the UK and the EU? JUDIT TÓTH – RENÁTA BOZSÓ – TATIANA KALKANOVA – 21 MAJA LADIĆ – ANITA MANDARIĆ VUKUŠIĆ – NORBERT MERKOVITY – TAMÁS PONGÓ – TÜNDE SZÉKELY – Could Adult Education Become a Means of Active Participatory Citizenship for Young People in the EU? BARRETT JIZENG FAN – Convergence, Compatibility or Decoration: 38 The Luxembourg Court’s References to Strasbourg Case Law in its Final Judgments TAMÁS LATTMANN – Situations Referred to the International Criminal Court by 68 the United Nations Security Council – “ad hoc Tribunalisation” of the Court and its Dangers BIANKA MAKSÓ – Exporting the Policy - International Data Transfer 79 and the Role of Binding Corporate Rules for Ensuring Adequate Safeguards Review BENCE KIS KELEMEN – Avery Plaw – Matthew S. Fricker – 87 Carlos R. Colon: The Drone Debate – A primer on the U. S. use of unmanned aircraft outside conventional battlefields. Pécs Journal of International and European Law - 2016/II Editorial The editors are pleased to present to the reader issue 2016/II of the Pécs Journal of International and European Law, published by the Centre for European Research and Education of the Faculty of Law of the University of Pécs. In the current issue, Cherry James looks at the consequences of Brexit on study mobility to and from the UK. Judit Tóth and her co-authors analyse the potential of adult education in the context of active citizenship. Barrett Jizeng Fan provides a detailed investigation of references made by the Court of Justice of the European Union to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Begins Here
    SECRETARIAT - 150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland - TEL: +41 22 791 6033 - FAX: +41 22 791 6506 www.actalliance.org Appeal Mauritania Support to People Affected by Drought in Mauritania and Senegal and to the Malian Refugees in southern Mauritania-MRT121 Appeal Target: US$ 3,039,387 Balance Requested: US$ 2,711,036 Geneva, 6 March 2012 Dear Colleagues, Mauritania and the neighbouring countries (mainly Mali and Senegal) have been affected by the ongoing Sahel food crisis characterised by food insecurity and malnutrition due to drought and other underlying factors in the region. It has been projected that 800,000 people in Mauritania, will need humanitarian assistance in 2012. In addition to the drought situation, the ongoing armed conflict in Northern Mali has forced thousands of Malians to cross the border to Mauritania. The drought and conflict have negatively impacted the entire Sahel Region resulting to hunger, malnutrition, displacement of people, destruction of local economies/livelihoods, pressure on limited existing food and water resources, increase of insecurity and violence. ACT member, LWF/DWS will respond to the drought situation in Mauritania, Fatick region of Senegal and provide assistance to the Malian refugees in Mauritania by working through local partners. The local partners include: ARDM, AU SECOURS and BSF in Mauritania, and Lutheran Church in Senegal (ELS) in Senegal’s Fatick region. This appeal will supplement the Mauritania government’s emergency response plan called ‘’EMEL’’ (hope). The project target is 8,653 households including: 4,206 drought affected households from Mauritania, 1,447 drought affected Households in Senegal and 3,000 Malian Refugees’ Households.
    [Show full text]
  • Pécs Journal of International and European Law 2. Sz. (2016.)
    嘀漀氀⸀ ㈀ ㄀㘀⼀㈀⸀ Table of Contents Editorial 5 CHERRY JAMES – Brexit: What now for Study Mobility between 7 the UK and the EU? JUDIT TÓTH – RENÁTA BOZSÓ – TATIANA KALKANOVA – 21 MAJA LADIĆ – ANITA MANDARIĆ VUKUŠIĆ – NORBERT MERKOVITY – TAMÁS PONGÓ – TÜNDE SZÉKELY – Could Adult Education Become a Means of Active Participatory Citizenship for Young People in the EU? BARRETT JIZENG FAN – Convergence, Compatibility or Decoration: 38 The Luxembourg Court’s References to Strasbourg Case Law in its Final Judgments TAMÁS LATTMANN – Situations Referred to the International Criminal Court by 68 the United Nations Security Council – “ad hoc Tribunalisation” of the Court and its Dangers BIANKA MAKSÓ – Exporting the Policy - International Data Transfer 79 and the Role of Binding Corporate Rules for Ensuring Adequate Safeguards Review BENCE KIS KELEMEN – Avery Plaw – Matthew S. Fricker – 87 Carlos R. Colon: The Drone Debate – A primer on the U. S. use of unmanned aircraft outside conventional battlefields. Pécs Journal of International and European Law - 2016/II Editorial The editors are pleased to present to the reader issue 2016/II of the Pécs Journal of International and European Law, published by the Centre for European Research and Education of the Faculty of Law of the University of Pécs. In the current issue, Cherry James looks at the consequences of Brexit on study mobility to and from the UK. Judit Tóth and her co-authors analyse the potential of adult education in the context of active citizenship. Barrett Jizeng Fan provides a detailed investigation of references made by the Court of Justice of the European Union to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification to the Parties No. 2012/036
    CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA NOTIFICATION TO THE PARTIES No. 2012/036 Geneva, 18 April 2012 CONCERNING: National laws for implementation of the Convention 1. Article VIII, paragraph 1, of the Convention requires each Party to take appropriate measures to enforce the provisions of the Convention and to prohibit trade in violation thereof. 2. Resolution Conf. 8.4 (Rev. CoP15) on National laws for implementation of the Convention was initially adopted in 1992. It establishes the basis for a CITES National Legislation Project aimed at providing legislative assistance to Parties and preparing analyses of their legislation in relation to four requirements (see document CoP12 Doc. 28 at http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/12/doc/E12-28.pdf for a detailed explanation of the requirements). Legislative analyses conducted under the National Legislation Project determine which of the following categories the legislation of each Party and dependent territory should be placed in: – Category 1: legislation that is believed generally to meet the requirements for implementation of CITES; – Category 2: legislation that is believed generally not to meet all of the requirements for the implementation of CITES; or – Category 3: legislation that is believed generally not to meet the requirements for the implementation of CITES. 3. In Resolution Conf. 8.4 (Rev. CoP15), the Conference of the Parties instructs the Standing Committee: to determine which Parties have not adopted appropriate measures for effective implementation of the Convention and to consider appropriate compliance measures, which may include recommendations to suspend trade, in accordance with Resolution Conf.
    [Show full text]
  • Situations Referred to the International Criminal Court by the United
    Pécs Journal of International and European Law - 2016/II Situations Referred to the International Criminal Court by the United Nations Security Council – “ad hoc Tribunalisation” of the Court and its Dangers Tamás Lattmann Senior researcher at the Institute of International Relations (Prague); associate professor at the National University of Public Service (Budapest) The study examines the possibility created by the Rome Statute, the founding and governing document of the International Criminal Court, according to which the United Nations Security Council has the option to refer situations to the court by a legally binding resolution acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. This is possible, regardless of the fact that the state concerned is a party to the Statue or not. According to the author’s conclusion – although only limited number of such situations could yet be examined – this legal possibility is currently far from being a success story. It is still important to emphasize that while it can be a really useful tool from the perspective of international politics, it may poses a serious threat to the future of the court. Keywords: International Criminal Court, ICC, United Nations, Security Council, referral, complementarity, ad hoc tribunal, Chapter VII, Sudan, Darfur, Bashir, Libya, Gaddafi, immunity. Different types of international criminal judicial fora have appeared and become active during the last 25 years. The examination of those and their relationship to states – the classic subjects of international law
    [Show full text]
  • 0125 1 MINUTES of the Meeting of 25 January 2012, from 15.00 to 16.00 Brussels the Meeting Opened at 15.15 on Wedne
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union DMAG_PV(2012)0125_1 MINUTES of the meeting of 25 January 2012, from 15.00 to 16.00 Brussels The meeting opened at 15.15 on Wednesday, 25 January 2012, with Pier Antonio Panzeri (Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda (PE 471.548) The agenda was adopted. 2. Approval of draft minutes of meeting of 20 December 2011 (PE 476.397) The minutes were approved. 3. Chair’s announcements The Chair announced that the next EP-Mauritania Interparliamentary meeting would be held on 20-24 February 2012 in Mauritania. This meeting will be a preparatory meeting for the mission. 4. Exchange of views on the existing political situation and reform process in Mauritania As Mr Sean Doyle was not available Mr Vincent Ringenberg, Desk Officer for Mauritania, the European External Action Service (EEAS), gave information about the current political and security situation in Mauritania and EU cooperation with Mauritania. He mentioned that after many years of instability and repeated coup d'états the political situation in Mauritania seems to be gradually settling down. However, the situation still continues to be fragile due to unsettled issues, particularly regarding the National Inclusive Dialogue indicated in the 2009 Dakar Agreement. 28 months after the Agreement, the dialogue finally took place in September and October 2011. While the major opposition parties boycotted the Dialogue, only two opposition parties joined the dialogue discussions. PV\886477EN.doc PE471.549v01-00 EN United in diversity EN One of the important positive points coming out of the Dialogue, is to set up a standing national independent election committee (CENI), which will be made up of 7 people on whom both the majority and the opposition would agree.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Full Potential of Social Safety Nets in Africa
    Realizing the Full Potential of Social Safety Nets in Africa Realizing the Full Potential of Social Safety Nets in Africa Kathleen Beegle, Aline Coudouel, and Emma Monsalve, Editors A copublication of the Agence Française de Développement and the World Bank © 2018 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / Th e World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 21 20 19 18 Th is work is a product of the staff of Th e World Bank with external contributions. Th e fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily refl ect the views of Th e World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent, or the Agence Française de Développement. Th e World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Th e boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of Th e World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of Th e World Bank, all of which are specifi cally reserved. Rights and Permissions Th is work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO), http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Beegle, Kathleen, Aline Coudouel, and Emma Monsalve.
    [Show full text]
  • ICC: Opening Pandora’S Box in Congo
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Cross-examining the past Transitional justice, mass atrocity trials and history in Africa Bouwknegt, T.B. Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bouwknegt, T. B. (2017). Cross-examining the past: Transitional justice, mass atrocity trials and history in Africa. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 6. Cross-examining the past. ICC: Opening Pandora’s box in Congo Ituri has been described as one of the bloodiest corners of the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is an area known for its abundant gold, diamonds and oil; a place where its people should have been living their lives with their families and benefiting from the riches of their homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Ecosystem-Based Adaptation in Coastal Environments a Guide for Environmental Managers and Planners
    I Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), February 2016 Copyright © UNEP 2016 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Citation: This document may be cited as: UNEP (2016). Options for Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EBA) in Coastal Environments: A Guide for environmental managers and planners. UNEP, Nairobi Lead Authors: Rebecca Mant, Will Simonson, Matea Osti, Xavier de Lamo & Nanna Vansteelant. Contributing Authors Stuart Crane, Nancy Soi, Ole Vestergaard, Ruth Fletcher, Steve Fletcher, Miriam Guth, Charlotte Hicks, Val Kapos, Robert Munroe, Lauren Weatherdon, Sylvia Wicander and Stephen Woroniecki. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the following for their feedback on the draft report: Ashton Berry (University of the Seychelles), Valeria Bers (Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, GIZ), Richard Munang (UNEP), Hannah Reid (International Institute for Environment and Development, IIED), Dixon G. Waruinge (UNEP) and Carina Wyborn (Luc Hoffmann Institute, WWF International). Cover Images: UNEP/ Kadir van Lohuizen | NOOR Design and Layout: Phillip Amunga Disclaimer: Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by UNEP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2012
    United Nations A/67/308 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 August 2012 Original: English Sixty-seventh session Item 75 of the provisional agenda* Report of the International Criminal Court Report of the International Criminal Court Note by the Secretary-General The report of the International Criminal Court on its activities for 2011/12 is submitted herewith to the General Assembly in accordance with article 6 of the Relationship Agreement between the United Nations and the International Criminal Court and paragraph 19 of General Assembly resolution 66/262. * A/67/150. 12-46357 (E) 140912 *1246357* A/67/308 Report of the International Criminal Court to the United Nations for 2011/12 Summary The present report, covering the period from 1 August 2011 to 31 July 2012, is the eighth annual report of the International Criminal Court submitted to the United Nations. The Court made significant progress during the reporting period, including: the issuance of its first judgement and sentence; one new case at the confirmation of charges phase; two new cases in the trial phase; and four new arrest warrants. The number of States parties to the Court’s founding treaty, the Rome Statute, increased from 115 to 121. The Court celebrated its tenth anniversary on 1 July 2012, which marked 10 years since the entry into force of its Statute. The Court issued its first judgement, in the case of The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, on 14 March 2012. Mr. Lubanga was sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment on 10 July 2012. The judgement and the sentence are subject to appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Yusuf Ibrahim Gamawa Yildirim B
    “THE TUAREGS AND REBELLION IN MALI: THE 2012 REBELLION AND FRENCH MILITARY INTERVENTION” YUSUF IBRAHIM GAMAWA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY MAY 2015 THE TUAREGS AND REBELLION IN MALI: THE 2012 REBELLION AND FRENCH MILITARY INTERVENTION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY BY YUSUF IBRAHIM GAMAWA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Approval of the Institute of Social Sciences ………………........................ Prof. Dr. Zeki Salih ZENGİN Head of Institute I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. .............................................. Prof. Dr. Birol AKGÜN Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ............................................. Asst. Prof. Dr Bayram SİNKAYA Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Birol AKGÜN (YBU, International Relations) ............................. Asst . Prof. Dr. Bayram SİNKAYA (YBU, International Relations) .............................. Prof. Dr. Selcuk ÇOLAKOĞLU (YBU, International Relations) ............................... Prof. Dr. Angelo SANTA GOSTINO (YBU,.Economics) ............................... Assist. Prof. Dr. Mehmet ÖZKAN (Polis Academy) ................................ PLAGIARISM PAGE I hereby declare that all information in this thesis has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work; otherwise I accept all legal responsibility. Yusuf Ibrahim Gamawa ..................................... i ABSTRACT “The Tuaregs and Rebellion in Mali: The 2012 Rebellion and French Military Intervention”.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Document &
    Registration document & fi nancial annual report 2012 This document is a non-certifi ed translation of the original French text for information purposes only. The declaration by the person responsible for the document is not applicable to this translation and is therefore not included herein. The original document was fi led with the Autorité des marchés fi nanciers (AMF), the French market regulator, on 17 April 2013 under No. D.13-0371 in accordance with article 212-13-II of the AMF’s General Regulations. Contents PAGE PAGE 1 Person responsible for 7 Organization chart 55 the Registration Document 3 7.1. Simplifi ed legal organization chart 1.1. Person responsible for the information for the Group as at December 31, 2012 55 contained in the Registration Document7.2. Information 3 on subsidiaries 1.2. Attestation by the person responsible and shareholdings 57 for the Registration Document 3 8 Real estate, factories and equipment 61 2 Statutory auditors 4 8.1. Real estate and equipment 61 2.1. Alternate auditors 48.2. Environmental policy 63 2.2. Deputy statutory auditors 5 2.3. Information on statutory auditors having 9 Examination of the fi nancial position resigned, having been dismissed or not and results 64 having been 9.1. renewedIntroduction 5 64 9.2. Comparison of the earnings for 3 Selected nancial informationfi 6 2012 and 2011 69 3.1. Overview of the Group 9.3. 6 Comparison of the earnings for 3.2. Selected fi nancial information 8 2011 and 2010 77 4 Risk factors 12 10 Cash ow andfl equity 88 4.1.
    [Show full text]