How Is Performance in the Heat Affected by Clothing?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Performance Textiles and Fabrics: Assessing and Verifying Product Performance Claims Executive Summary
PERFORMANCE TEXTILES AND FABRICS: ASSESSING AND VERIFYING PRODUCT PERFORMANCE CLAIMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Performance textiles and fabrics are rapidly bringing apparel and footwear products into the 21st century. Manufacturers today are innovating at breakneck speed and bringing to the market synthetic textiles and fabrics with enhanced performance characteristics, or that feature embedded fibers or topical applications. This has led to the widespread introduction of advanced performance apparel and footwear that offer consumers new levels of comfort and safety. At the same time, sorting through claims regarding the performance characteristics of these advanced textiles and fabrics can present real challenges for manufacturers, retailers and consumers. At a minimum, the myriad of vague, conflicting or unsubstantiated marketing claims and characterizations used to promote these materials often result in frustration and disappointment. And fraudulent representations can unnecessarily expose apparel manufacturers and retail buyers to potentially hazardous chemicals and other risks. This UL white paper identifies some of the key performance considerations for advanced textiles and fabrics, and reviews the challenges of vague or unsubstantiated marketing claims used to promote these products. The white paper also discusses the importance of verifying performance claims, and offers an overview of UL’s marketing claim verification services for performance textiles and fabrics. page 2 BACKGROUND Performance textiles and fabrics are generally defined as materials that have been expressly designed and produced to include or to enhance specific performance characteristics, such as increased warmth, durability or moisture resistance. These new or enhanced performance characteristics are typically achieved through the selection of specialized fibers, or the inclusion of such fibers along with natural or synthetic materials during the spinning, weaving or knitting process, or by the addition of coatings or other finishes to the finished fabric. -
Personal Protective Equipment Program Purpose & Scope
Revised: 8/1/20 Personal Protective Equipment Program Purpose & Scope The purpose of this program is to establish guidelines for Fayetteville State University employees who may encounter workplace hazards that require personal protective equipment (PPE) as prescribed in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) PPE Standard – 29 CFR 1910.132. This program applies to all employees that must wear PPE. Program Statement It is the responsibility of Fayetteville State University to protect students, faculty, and staff from anticipated hazards. This program establishes a minimum standard for the use of personal protective equipment within Fayetteville State University to ensure compliance with OSHA standards. Definitions Eye & Face Protection – Equipment designed to provide protection to the face and eyes during exposure to such hazards as flying particles, molten metal or sparks, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, or potentially injurious light radiation (i.e. lasers, welding, etc.) Foot Protection – Equipment designed to provide protection to the feet and toes during exposure to such hazards as falling or rolling objects, chemical or liquid exposures, piercing objects through the sole or uppers, and/or where the employee’s feet are exposed to electrical hazards. Hand Protection – Equipment designed to provide protection to the hands during exposures to potential hazards such as sharp objects, abrasive surfaces, temperature extremes, and chemical contact. Hazard Assessment – The process used to identify hazards in the workplace and to select the appropriate personal protective equipment to guard against potential hazards (see Hazard Assessment Guidelines at the end of this program). Head Protection – Equipment designed to provide protection to the head during exposure to potential hazards such as falling objects, striking against low hanging objects, or electrical hazards. -
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010 3 © American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc
© American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE’s prior written permission. 2.2 It is intended that all of the criteria in this standard be average person seated at rest. The surface area of an average applied together since comfort in the indoor environment is person is 1.8 m2 (19 ft2). complex and responds to the interaction of all of the factors that are addressed. metabolic rate (M): the rate of transformation of chemical energy into heat and mechanical work by metabolic activities 2.3 This standard specifies thermal environmental condi- within an organism, usually expressed in terms of unit area of tions acceptable for healthy adults at atmospheric pressure the total body surface. In this standard, metabolic rate is equivalent to altitudes up to 3000 m (10,000 ft) in indoor expressed in met units. spaces designed for human occupancy for periods not less than 15 minutes. naturally conditioned spaces, occupant controlled: those spaces where the thermal conditions of the space are regulated 2.4 This standard does not address such nonthermal envi- primarily by the opening and closing of windows by the occu- ronmental factors as air quality, acoustics, and illumination or pants. other physical, chemical, or biological space contaminants that may affect comfort or health. neutrality, thermal: the indoor thermal index value corre- sponding with a mean vote of neutral on the thermal sensation 3. DEFINITIONS scale. adaptive model: a model that relates indoor design tempera- percent dissatisfied (PD): percentage of people predicted to tures or acceptable temperature ranges to outdoor meteorolog- be dissatisfied due to local discomfort. -
Thermal Comfort Metabolic Rate and Clothing Inference
Thermal Comfort Metabolic Rate and Clothing Inference Christos Timplalexis1, Asimina Dimara1, Stelios Krinidis1, and Dimitrios Tzovaras1 Centre for Research and Technology Hellas/ Information Technologies Institute 6th Km Charilaou-Thermis 57001, Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece fctimplalexis, adimara, krinidis, [email protected] Abstract. This paper examines the implementation of an algorithm for the prediction of metabolic rate (M) and clothing insulation (Icl) values in indoor spaces. Thermal comfort is calculated according to Fanger's steady state model. In Fanger's approach, M and Icl are two parameters that have a strong impact on the calculation of thermal comfort. The es- timation of those parameters is usually done, utilizing tables that match certain activities with metabolic rate values and garments with insula- tion values that aggregate to a person's total clothing. In this work, M and Icl are predicted utilizing indoor temperature (T ), indoor humidity (H) and thermal comfort feedback provided by the building occupants. The training of the predictive model, required generating a set of train- ing data using values in pre-defined boundaries for each variable. The accuracy of the algorithm is showcased by experimental results. The promising capabilities that derive from the successful implementation of the proposed method are discussed in the conclusions. Keywords: thermal comfort · metabolic rate · clothing insulation. 1 Introduction In modern societies people spend almost 90% of their time indoors [6]. Stud- ies have shown that indoor thermal conditions may impact on the occupants' attendance and cognitive performance [10]. Consequently, indoor thermal con- ditions should be regulated so that they do not have any negative effect to the occupants' feeling or execution of activities. -
Objective Measurement of Heat Transport Through Clothing
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 2, Issue 12 (August 2012), PP. 43-47 Objective Measurement of Heat Transport through Clothing Devanand Uttam Department of Textile Engineering, Punjab Technical University, Giani Zail Singh Campus, Bathinda-151001(Punjab) India Abstract––Heat transport analysis of any solid or porous material is an important issue for textile, mechanical, chemical, production, aeronautical and metallurgical engineers. The maintenance of thermal balance is probably the most important physical comfort attribute of clothing and has occupied the attention of many textile research workers. Transmission of heat through a fabric occurs both by conduction through the fibre and the entrapped air and by radiation. Practical methods of test for thermal conductivity measure the total heat transmitted by both mechanism. An objective measure is one carried out with the aid of instruments that do not depend on the opinion of a human being. In this paper, the various instruments which are utilized for objective measurement of the heat transport properties of clothing; are discussed. Keywords–– Alambeta, Guarded hot plate, Heat transmission, Togmeter I. INTRODUCTION The heat transmission behavior of a fabric critically important for human survival and plays a very important role in maintaining thermo-physiological comfort [1]. Clothing is an important issue for general consumer, active athletes and for those who practice jogging, skiing, golf or other sports just for fitness in their time [2]. Many researches and industries are engaged to develop the functional active fabrics that are most suitable for the comfort point of view. -
Osta Van 0771671
Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Thermal comfort in hospital wards a comparison between two indoor conditioning systems van Osta, M.P.A. Award date: 2017 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain __________________________________________________ Thermal comfort in hospital wards A comparison between two indoor conditioning systems __________________________________________________ Mike van Osta student nr. 0771671 Building Physics and Services Eindhoven University of Technology Supervisors: prof. dr. H.S.M. (Helianthe) Kort dr. ir. M.G.L.C. (Marcel) Loomans dr. A.K. (Asit) Mishra ir. W. (Wim) Maassen PdEng Date: 26-01-2018 Master Thesis: 7SS37 II Summary Summary Health care facilities need to become more energy efficient in order to reach upcoming nearly zero energy requirements (nZEB). -
2013 Cotton Performance Tests
The Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock/Halfway/Pecos - 2014 COTTON PERFORMANCE TESTS in the Texas High Plains and Trans Pecos Areas of Texas 2013 Technical Report TEXAS A&M AgriLife RESEARCH / CRAIG NESSLER, DIRECTOR THE TEXAS A&M SYSTEM / COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Cotton Performance Tests in the Texas High Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas 20131/ J.K. Dever, V. Morgan, M.S. Kelley, T.A. Wheeler, H. Flippin, V. Mendoza, and A. Cranmer2/ Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center Lubbock-Halfway-Pecos 1/ Tests were conducted by Texas A&M AgriLife Research in cooperation with Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. 2/ Associate Professor, Research Associate, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock; Extension Specialist, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Lubbock; Professor, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock; Research Technician, Research Assistant, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock; Farm Research Manager, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Halfway. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 5 Glossary of Table Headings ......................................................................................................................... 6 UNIFORM COTTON VARIETY TESTS - IRRIGATED Table Lubbock 1 Production Information ......................................................................................... -
2016 Top Markets Report Technical Textiles
2016 Top Markets Report Technical Textiles A Market Assessment Tool for U.S. Exporters May 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce | International Trade Administration | Industry & Analysis (I&A) Industry & Analysis’ (I&A) staff of industry, trade and economic analysts devise and implement international trade, investment, and export promotion strategies that strengthen the global competitiveness of U.S. industries. These initiatives unlock export, and investment opportunities for U.S. businesses by combining in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis with ITA’s industry relationships. For more information, visit www.trade.gov/industry I&A is part of the International Trade Administration, whose mission is to create prosperity by strengthening the competitiveness of U.S. industry, promoting trade and investment, and ensuring fair trade and compliance with trade laws and agreements. Robert Carrigg and Rachel Alarid served as lead authors on this report. A special thanks goes to the many commercial specialists that reviewed early drafts and provided thoughtful insights and support. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 2 Overview and Key Findings ................................................................................................................ 5 Country Case Studies Brazil ........................................................................................................................................................... -
Determination of Open-Circuit, Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus
Procedure No. RCT-CBRN-STP-0002 Page 1 of 31 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory Respirator Branch 626 Cochrans Mill Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania15236 Date: December 14, 2001. NOTE: The Respirator Branch maintains an updated index of current procedures. DETERMINATION OF OPEN CIRCUIT, SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS (SCBA) PERFORMANCE DURING DYNAMIC TESTING AGAINST CHEMICAL AGENTS OF SARIN (GB) VAPOR AND DISTILLED SULFUR MUSTARD (HD) VAPOR AND LIQUID STANDARD TESTING PROCEDURE (STP) 1. PURPOSE 1.1 This test establishes the procedures for ensuring the level of respiratory protection provided under special Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) requirements for Open-circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) with Full Facepiece submitted for Approval, Extension of Approval, or examined during Certification Product Audits, meet the minimum certification standards set forth in Title 42 CFR, Part 84, Subpart G, Section 84.63(c). 1.2 This procedure is used to test SCBA systems against Sarin GB vapor or Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) vapor and/or liquid, while the mask is operated in dynamic mode by means of a breather pump connected to the mouth area of the manikin. The mask is installed on a head/upper torso form known as a Simulant Agent Resistant Test Manikin (SMARTMAN). The SMARTMAN is enclosed in an air-tight exposure chamber. Instrumentation is integrated under one static chamber platform capable of generating and controlling challenge concentrations and detecting precise agent permeation of a tested respirator. Sampling ports, associated detection systems and exhalation engineering controls in the SMARTMAN are used to detect the presence of agent at known sampling areas of the eye and oral/nasal regions. -
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 (Supersedes ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2013) Includes ANSI/ASHRAE addenda listed in Appendix N Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy See Appendix N for approval dates. This Standard is under continuous maintenance by a Standing Standard Project Committee (SSPC) for which the Standards Committee has established a documented program for regular publication of addenda or revisions, including procedures for timely, documented, consensus action on requests for change to any part of the Standard. The change submittal form, instructions, and deadlines may be obtained in electronic form from the ASHRAE website (www.ashrae.org) or in paper form from the Senior Manager of Standards. The latest edition of an ASHRAE Standard may be purchased from the ASHRAE website (www.ashrae.org) or from ASHRAE Customer Service, 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305. E-mail: [email protected]. Fax: 678-539-2129. Telephone: 404-636-8400 (worldwide), or toll free 1-800-527-4723 (for orders in US and Canada). For reprint permission, go to www.ashrae.org/permissions. © 2017 ASHRAE ISSN 1041-2336 ASHRAE Standing Standard Project Committee 55 Cognizant TC: 2.1, Physiology and Human Environment SPLS Liaison: John F. Dunlap Abhijeet Pande*, Chair Thomas B. Hartman* Michael P. O’Rourke Josh Eddy*, Secretary David Heinzerling* Gwelen Paliaga Sahar Abbaszadeh Michael A. Humphreys Zaccary A. Poots* Peter F. Alspach* Daniel Int-Hout, III Julian Rimmer* Edward A. Arens* Kristof Irwin Stefano Schiavon Richard M. Aynsley Essam E. Khalil* Lawrence J. Schoen* Robert Bean* Thomas Lesser* Peter Simmonds Atze Boerstra Baizhan Li Aaron R. -
Human Comfort and Health Requirements
13357_Bradshaw_3p_c01.f.qxd 3/15/06 10:19 AM Page 3 Chapter 1 Human Comfort and Health Requirements COMFORT CONDITIONS THERMAL COMFORT STANDARDS HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY THERMAL INDICES HEAT VS. TEMPERATURE THE COMFORT CHART BODY TEMPERATURE CONTROL ASHRAE’S THERMAL COMFORT STANDARD DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS HEAT BALANCE INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY EVAPORATION RADIATION TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY EXTREMES CONVECTION-CONDUCTION HEAT STRESS COMBINED EFFECTS RESPONSE TO EXTREME COLD METABOLISM AIR QUALITY AND QUANTITY CLOTHING AIR CONTAMINANTS ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ODORS DRY-BULB TEMPERATURE VENTILATION HUMIDITY MEAN RADIANT TEMPERATURECOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL AIR MOVEMENT 3 13357_Bradshaw_3p_c01.f.qxd 3/15/06 10:19 AM Page 4 4 THERMAL CONTROL CONCEPTS Thermal and atmospheric conditions in an enclosed space need for large windows, which provided light and ventilation are usually controlled in order to ensure (1) the health and in older commercial and institutional buildings. Although comfort of the occupants or (2) the proper functioning of windows are still important for aesthetics, daylighting, and sensitive electronic equipment, such as computers, or certain natural ventilation, windowless interior spaces may now be manufacturing processes that have a limited range of tem- used to a much greater extent. Air conditioning allows for perature and humidity tolerance. The former is referred to as more compact designs with lower ceilings, fewer windows, comfort conditioning, and the latter is called process air less exterior wall areas, and less land space for a given en- conditioning. The conditions required for optimum opera- closed area. Conditioned air, which is cleaner and humidity- tion of machinery may or may not coincide with those con- controlled, contributes to reduced maintenance of the space. -
Performance Upholstery Summary
PERFORMANCE UPHOLSTERY KnollTextiles offers a variety of upholstery fabrics suitable for demanding environments. These fabrics have specific properties or characteristics qualifying them for performance use. Performance attributes may be inherent to the fiber or added to the fabric with a variety of finishing technologies applied during or after the production process. This document defines performance criteria for upholstery fabrics and offers a comparison of fibers and stocked finishes. Please see the Performance Finishes document for information on KnollTextiles’ aftermarket finishing options. When considering performance products always qualify the end use and the expectations of the environment. For example, is bleach cleaning necessary? Will the upholstery be exposed to direct sunlight? Is it vulnerable to liquids and spills? To assist in choosing the most appropriate upholsteries, KnollTextiles offers an online advanced search function that filters search results by specific performance criteria. Items marked in this document with a magnifying glass are advanced search filters found on knolltextiles.com DEFINITIONS The Association of Contract Textiles (ACT) defines performance by the following characteristics: Flammability Measurement of a fabric’s performance when exposed to specific sources of ignition. Colorfastness A material’s degree of resistance to the fading effect of light. Wet and dry crocking The transfer of dye from the surface of a dyed or printed fabric onto another surface by rubbing. Physical Properties Key factors in assessing overall durability of fabric vary depending on the fabric construction. Abrasion The surface wear of a fabric caused by rubbing and contact with another fabric. At KnollTextiles, we also consider: Bleach Cleanability Fabric that does not weaken or fade when exposed to bleach.